South African Journal of Botany 88 (2013) 317–325 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect South African Journal of Botany journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb Warneckea parvifolia (Melastomataceae–Olisbeoideae), a new “sand-forest” endemic from northeastern KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa) and southernmost Mozambique, and a phylogenetic analysis of eastern and southern African representatives of W. section Warneckea R.D. Stone ⁎, N.A. Ntetha School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 1 July 2013 Received in revised form 3 August 2013 Accepted 12 August 2013 Available online 24 September 2013 Edited by JC Manning Keywords: Maputaland Melastomataceae Molecular phylogenetics Mozambique New species Sand forest South Africa Taxonomy Warneckea a b s t r a c t Warneckea populations from “sand-forest” or “sand-thicket” habitats in Tembe Elephant Park, South Africa, and Licuati Forest Reserve in adjacent southern Mozambique were previously thought to be a small-leaved form of W. sousae, which typically includes larger-leaved plants ranging from central Mozambique northward to Tanzania. We examine this hypothesis using molecular and morphological evidence. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis of combined nrDNA ETS and ITS sequence data failed to resolve W. sousae and the Maputaland populations as an exclusively monophyletic group. Instead, the Kenyan endemic W. mouririifolia was strongly supported as the sister species of W. sousae, and the Maputaland plants were resolved in a separate, strongly supported clade together with populations of an as-yet undetermined Warneckea species from northern Mozambique. A hypothesis of exclusive monophyly for the plants from Tembe and Licuati had moderate support in separate ETS and ITS1 analyses (bootstrap proportions of 88% and 81%, respectively). Statistically significant differences in leaf dimensions and internode length were found between the Maputaland plants and typical W. sousae. We conclude that the populations from Tembe and Licuati represent a distinct species, which we describe as W. parvifolia. The species differs from W. sousae in having shorter internodes (mostly 5–25 mm not 10–60 mm long), smaller leaves (mostly 14–32 × 8–19 mm not 40–76 × 22–52 mm), shorter petioles (mostly 1–1.5 mm not 1.5–6 mm long), smaller flowers (hypanthium 1 × 1.5–1.75 mm not 1.5–2 × 2 mm; calyx lobes 0.5 mm not 0.75 mm long; staminal filaments 3–4 mm not 5 mm long; style 4–5 mm not 9 mm long), and globose fruit (not obovoid). An IUCN conservation status of Endangered (EN) B1a, b(ii, iii) is indicated for W. parvifolia, due to its limited distribution and projected declines in its habitat quality and area of occupancy. © 2013 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Molecular phylogenetics holds much promise as a method for discovering previously undetected biodiversity at and near the species level (Baldwin, 2000). This is especially true when the phylogenetic approach is augmented with evidence from morphology and ecogeography. Lineages identified by molecular means are not necessarily morphologically cryptic: in some cases they may represent morphologically distinctive taxa that have been previously treated within more broadly circumscribed species. Integrated approaches to discovering fine-scale biodiversity should lead to a refined system of classification, and also to better-informed biodiversity assessments and strategies aimed at conservation of rare species. Here we consider the circumscription of the taxon originally described as Memecylon sousae A. Fern. & R. Fern. and recently transferred to the ⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: +27 332606085; fax: +27 332605105. E-mail addresses: StoneRD@ukzn.ac.za, usambara2002@yahoo.com (R.D. Stone). 0254-6299/$ – see front matter © 2013 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2013.08.005 genus Warneckea as W. sousae (A. Fern. & R. Fern.) A.E. van Wyk (Coates Palgrave, 2002). When first described, W. sousae was known from just four collections in Mozambique (Fernandes and Fernandes, 1972). The first report of this species from South Africa is that of Ross (1976), based on collections by Prof. Eugene Moll in “sand forest” 6–7 km west of Muzi in what is now the Tembe Elephant Park. The leaves of the collection Moll & Nel 5592 (K, MO, PRE) were described as up to 35 × 17 mm and “significantly smaller” than those of W. sousae, which had been described as having leaves 30–90 × 15–65 mm. Ross (1976) considered that the Tembe plants might represent an undescribed species if it could be shown that their leaves were consistently smaller than those of typical W. sousae, but the leaves in Moll & Müller 5690 (K, NH, NU) were more variable in size, ranging up to 56 × 38 mm, thus matching those of typical W. sousae. On the basis of these observations, Ross (1976) concluded that the Tembe plants fall within the range of variation of W. sousae. Stone and Andreasen (2010) published a molecular phylogeny of the Afro-Madagascan genus Warneckea. Among the DNA sequences included in that study were those obtained from a collection of typical 318 R.D. Stone, N.A. Ntetha / South African Journal of Botany 88 (2013) 317–325 W. sousae from northern Mozambique (Luke 10168, CAS, EA, K). These results showed that W. sousae belongs in W. section Warneckea (a group that includes other Warneckea species from East Africa, Madagascar, and Mauritius), but no populations from South Africa or extreme southern Mozambique were included in the study. We analyse new molecular and morphological evidence to assess whether the small-leaved populations from South Africa and extreme southern Mozambique are appropriately treated as conspecific with Warneckea sousae. The molecular data comprise sequences from the rDNA ETS and ITS regions, which have proven to be informative about species-level relationships in other angiosperm groups (Baldwin et al., 1995; Baldwin and Markos, 1998). At the morphological level, we have made comparative measurements of leaf dimensions, internode length, and floral and fruit dimensions based on herbarium material. We conclude that the Warneckea plants from “sand-forest” and “sandthicket” in South Africa and extreme southern Mozambique are a distinct species, which we describe here as W. parvifolia. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Plant material and taxonomic sampling Four Warneckea samples were collected in Tembe Elephant Park, South Africa and one sample from Licuati Forest Reserve in southern Mozambique (Table 1). Leaf samples for DNA analysis were initially dried in silica-gel (Chase and Hills, 1991), and the corresponding Table 1 Voucher details, collecting localities and Genbank accession numbers for DNA sequences analysed in the present study. GenBank accession nos. Taxon Voucher specimen details ETS ITS Warneckea amaniensis Gilg Kenya, Coast Province: Shimba Hills National Reserve, Longomwagandi forest, Stone et al. 2415 (CAS) Tanzania, Tanga Region: E Usambara Mountains, Mlinga peak, Stone et al. 2435 (CAS) Guinea-Conakry, Nzérékoré Region: Beyla Prefecture, footpath from village Sondou to pass S of Mont Tibe, Van der Burgt 1120 (K) Kenya, Coast Province: Shimba Hills National Reserve, Longomwagandi forest, Stone et al. 2416 (CAS) Tanzania, Tanga Region: E Usambara Mountains, Amani Nature Reserve, Kwamkoro forest, Stone et al. 2431 (CAS) Tanzania, Tanga Region: E Usambara Mountains, Amani Nature Reserve, Sangarawe forest, Stone et al. 2436 (CAS) Madagascar, Fianarantsoa Province: Manombo Special Reserve, Parcel no. 1, Stone et al. 2395 (CAS) Cameroon, South Province: 5 km N of Kribi, Stone & Ghogue 2539 (CAS) Madagascar, Antsiranana Province: Masoala National Park, upper basin of the Ampanavoana river, Stone et al. 2407 (CAS) Kenya, Coast Province: Arabuko-Sokoke forest, Stone & Gitau 2427 (CAS) Cameroon, South West Province: Bakossi Mountains, 2.5 km E of Nyandong, Stone & Ghogue 2448 (CAS) Kenya, Coast Province: Kwale District, Buda (Mafisini) forest, Stone & Gitau 2424 (CAS) Kenya, Coast Province: Arabuko-Sokoke forest, Stone & Gitau 2428 (CAS) Mozambique, Maputo Province: Boane District, Licuati Forest Reserve, Burrows et al. 11517 (BNRH) South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal Province: Umkhanyakude District, Tembe Elephant Park, Ntetha et al. 1 (NU) South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal Province: Umkhanyakude District, Tembe Elephant Park, Ntetha et al. 2 (NU) South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal Province: Umkhanyakude District, Tembe Elephant Park, Ntetha et al. 3 (NU) South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal Province: Umkhanyakude District, Tembe Elephant Park, Ntetha et al. 4 (NU) Cameroon, South Province: colline de Mill, 5 km NE of Lolodorf, Stone et al. 2525 (CAS) Kenya, Coast Province: Kwale District, Gongoni forest, Stone et al. 2423 (CAS) Tanzania, Morogoro Region: Udzungwa Mountains National Park, Luke et al. 8741 (CAS) Tanzania, Morogoro Region: Udzungwa Mountains National Park, Luke et al. 8759 (CAS) Mozambique, Cabo Delgado Province: Nangade to Palma, Luke et al. 10168 (CAS) Mozambique, Cabo Delgado Province: Quionga to Nachindundo, Luke 13796 (EA) Tanzania, Morogoro Region: Udzungwa Mountains National Park, Luke et al. 8777 (CAS) Mozambique, Cabo Delgado Province: Nangade to Palma, Luke et al. 10155 (CAS) Mozambique, Cabo Delgado Province: Nangade to Pundanhar, Luke 13735 (EA) FJ792854 FJ792927 FJ792864 FJ792931 KC897074 KC897082 FJ792866 FJ792933 FJ792867 FJ792934 FJ792868 FJ792935 FJ792870 AY903373 FJ792871 AY903372 FJ792872 FJ792937 FJ792874 FJ792938 FJ792876 FJ792939 FJ792878 FJ792941 FJ792879 FJ792942 KC897075 KC897083 KC897076 KC897084 KC897077 KC897085 KC897078 KC897086 KC897079 Missing data FJ792881 FJ792944 FJ792882 FJ792945 FJ792888 FJ792949 FJ792889 FJ792950 FJ792890 FJ792951 KC897081 KC897087 FJ792903 FJ792956 FJ792904 FJ792957 KC897080 Missing data Warneckea ?erubescens (Gilg) Jacq.-Fél. Warneckea fascicularis (Planch. ex Benth.) Jacq.-Fél. Warneckea hedbergiorum Borhidi Warneckea hedbergiorum Borhidi Warneckea hedbergiorum Borhidi Warneckea madagascariensis Jacq.-Fél. Warneckea mangrovensis (Jacq.-Fél.) R.D. Stone Warneckea masoalae R.D. Stone Warneckea melindensis (A. Fern. & R. Fern.) R.D. Stone & Q. Luke Warneckea membranifolia (Hook. f.) Jacq.-Fél. Warneckea mouririifolia (Brenan) Borhidi Warneckea mouririifolia (Brenan) Borhidi Warneckea parvifolia R.D. Stone & Ntetha Warneckea parvifolia R.D. Stone & Ntetha Warneckea parvifolia R.D. Stone & Ntetha Warneckea parvifolia R.D. Stone & Ntetha Warneckea parvifolia R.D. Stone & Ntetha Warneckea pulcherrima (Gilg) Jacq.-Fél. Warneckea sansibarica (Taub.) Jacq.-Fél. Warneckea ?schliebenii (Markgr.) Jacq.-Fél. Warneckea ?schliebenii (Markgr.) Jacq.-Fél. Warneckea sousae (A. Fern. & R. Fern.) A.E. van Wyk Warneckea sousae (A. Fern. & R. Fern.) A.E. van Wyk Warneckea sp. Warneckea sp. Warneckea sp. R.D. Stone, N.A. Ntetha / South African Journal of Botany 88 (2013) 317–325 herbarium voucher was deposited in the Bews Herbarium (NU). New rDNA sequences were also obtained from samples of W. fascicularis (Van der Burgt 1120, K), typical W. sousae (Luke 13796, EA), and an undetermined Warneckea species from Cabo Delgado Province in northern Mozambique (Luke 13735, EA). GenBank accession numbers for newly reported sequences are in the range of KC897074 to KC897087. In addition to the ETS and ITS sequences newly obtained for the current study, the phylogenetic analysis included previously published sequences (Stone and Andreasen, 2010) from Warneckea subgenus Carnosae (2 samples), W. section Strychnoides (2 samples), W. section Guineenses (1 sample), and W. section Warneckea (14 samples). The sequences from W. subgenus Carnosae were selected as the outgroup, since this subgenus is the hypothesised sister-group of W. subgenus Warneckea (Stone, 2006; Stone and Andreasen, 2010). 2.2. DNA isolation, amplification, and sequencing Total genomic DNAs were isolated and the rDNA ETS and ITS regions were amplified and sequenced as previously described by Stone and Andreasen (2010). Genomic DNAs were generally diluted at 1:10 or 1:50 in ultrapure water for use in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) experiments. The pool of amplicons from the initial PCR was directly sequenced with good results. 2.3. DNA sequence alignment Forward and reverse sequences were assembled into contigs using the computer program ChromasPro, version 1.5 (Technelysium Pty. Ltd., Australia). In some cases the direct sequences exhibited site-specific polymorphisms. These were not common and were simply coded as polymorphic during contig assembly. Sequence alignment was generally unambiguous and was completed manually under a general criterion of maximising similarity (Simmons, 2004) while further aiming to treat indels as unique events (Morrison, 2006). ETS sequences were verified by a 40-nucleotide motif at the 3′ end, corresponding to the highly conserved 5′ end of the 18S rRNA gene (cf. Baldwin and Markos, 1998). After alignment of the ITS region, the middle part (i.e., the highly conserved 5.8S rRNA gene) was excised, leaving separate ITS1 and ITS2 data sets for further analysis. Previous authors have noted the presence of potentially informative length mutations (indels) in rDNA transcribed spacer sequences (e.g., Baldwin et al., 1995; Baldwin and Markos, 1998; Hershkovitz et al., 1999). In this study, gaps were treated as missing data and each unique indel was recoded as a binary character using the “simple indel coding method” of Simmons and Ochoterena (2000). 2.4. Phylogenetic analyses Maximum-likelihood (ML) tree searches were implemented in the Windows version of the program GARLI 2.0 (Zwickl, 2006), with 100 rounds of topology, branch-length, and model-parameter optimisation from a random starting tree. The ETS, ITS1 and ITS2 input files each consisted of two partitions, the first partition containing the sequence alignment and the second the corresponding recoded indels to which a simple binary (restriction-site) model was applied. Selection of DNA substitution models was guided by non-nested comparisons using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC), both methods implemented in the program jModeltest 0.1.1 (Posada, 2008). Based on these results, an HKY+G substitution model was selected for the ETS and ITS1 regions (accounting for unequal base frequencies and bias in substitution rates favouring transitions over transversions, as well as among-site rate inconstancy following a gamma distribution with 4 discrete rate categories). For the ITS2 region, a GTR+G substitution model was selected (assuming different probabilities of change for each of six substitution types and gammadistributed rate variation among sites). Internal clade support was assessed by non-parametric bootstrapping (Felsenstein, 1985), with 319 ML analysis of 100 pseudoreplicates and 10 rounds of optimisation from a random starting-tree per pseudoreplicate. Arguments for and against combining data have been well reviewed (de Queiroz et al., 1995). According to the philosophy of “conditional combination,” data from different partitions must first survive a test of heterogeneity (Bull et al., 1993; Huelsenbeck et al., 1996). One such test is to examine whether high bootstrap support for conflicting clades in phylogenetic trees is inferred by the separate data sets (de Queiroz, 1993). In the current study, separate ML analyses of ETS, ITS1, and ITS2 yielded tree topologies that are not significantly incongruent (results not shown). The separate data sets were thus combined in a single ETS + ITS1 + ITS2 analysis. For two samples (Luke 13735 and Ntetha 4) the ITS1 and ITS2 sequences and gap characters were coded as missing data in the combined analysis (because no ITS sequences were obtained). 2.5. Morphological analyses Morphological data were gathered from herbarium material kept at NU or obtained on loan from other institutions (see Acknowledgements). The morphological study was limited to comparisons between Warneckea collections from South Africa and southernmost Mozambique on the one hand (see Sections 5.1 and 5.6 for a list of specimens examined), and those of W. sousae from central to northern Mozambique on the other. The following specimens of W. sousae were examined for the morphological study: Mozambique. CABO DELGADO: Quiterajo, SE edge of Guibourtia (Banana) forest, 24 Nov 2008, J.E. Burrows & S.M. Burrows 10703 (BNRH); Namacubi (Banana) Forest, west of Quiterajo, 25 Nov 2008, J.E. Burrows & S.M. Burrows 10771 & 10772 (BNRH); 10 km NW of Palma, Miculumo area, 8 Dec 2008, Timberlake et al. 5632 (BNRH). NAMPULA: Reserva da Crusse, between Matibane and Nacala, 19 Mar 2009, J.E. Burrows & S.M. Burrows 11240 (BNRH). SOFALA: Beira region, Chinizina, at side the way to the river Macalaua, 5 May 1957, Gomes e Sousa 4380 (isotypes K, PRE); Beira district, Cheringoma section, riverine forest, 15 July 1972, C.J. Ward 7970 (NU, UDW); ca. 25 km from Chinizina River crossing eastwards towards the sea, 8 Oct 2007, J.E. Burrows & S.M. Burrows 10162 (BNRH). For each specimen, leaf length and width were measured for all leaves except those that were very young (hence not fully developed) or obviously deformed. Also measured was the length of all internodes except those of the current year's growth. For each parameter the mean value was calculated for each specimen in order to avoid pseudoreplication. An independent-samples t-test was implemented using the computer program SPSS version 15 to test for significant differences in mean leaf dimensions and internode length between typical specimens of W. sousae and those collections from South Africa and southernmost Mozambique [W. parvifolia]. Prior to this test, the assumption of normality was also tested for each group using the one-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, and the assumption of equality of variances was tested using Levene's test. Results suggested that the values of all three parameters were normally distributed. Equality of variances was met for leaf width but not for leaf length or internode length, so the values of these two parameters were log transformed. After log transformation the assumption of equality of variances was met. 3. Results 3.1. DNA sequence alignment The ETS alignment had more than twice the number of parsimonyinformative nucleotide sites as the ITS1 or ITS2 alignments (Table 2). This is understandable because the part of the ETS that was sequenced is more than twice as long as the other two spacer regions. The proportion of parsimony-informative nucleotide sites was approximately equal for ETS and ITS1, with a lower proportion seen in ITS2. The ETS 320 R.D. Stone, N.A. Ntetha / South African Journal of Botany 88 (2013) 317–325 Table 2 Summary of nrDNA ETS, ITS1 and ITS2 sequence variation among the samples of Warneckea included in this study. Number of sequences Raw sequence length (nt) Aligned sequence length (nt) G–C content Pairwise sequence divergence (corrected) Sect. Warneckea All sequences Variable sites Sect. Warneckea All sequences Informative sites Sect. Warneckea All sequences Invariant sites Sect. Warneckea All sequences Recoded gap characters Informative gap characters ETS ITS1 ITS2 27 602–617 635 43–46% 25 257–266 274 46–49% 25 243–255 263 52–60% 0–0.07 0–0.22 0–0.09 0–0.28 0–0.09 0–0.18 92 (14%) 174 (27%) 35 (13%) 63 (23%) 35 (13%) 70 (27%) 60 (9.4%) 132 (21%) 28 (10%) 54 (20%) 16 (6.1%) 43 (16%) 543 (86%) 461 (73%) 27 13 239 (87%) 211 (77%) 12 6 228 (87%) 193 (73%) 15 6 region also had the highest number of recoded gap characters and parsimony-informative gap characters. 3.2. Phylogenetic analyses Outgroup-rooted ML analysis of the combined sequence data plus binary-recoded gaps produced a single tree (Fig. 1) which is similar to the separate ETS, ITS1, and ITS2 trees (not shown) but is generally better resolved with increased internal support. Monophyly of Warneckea section Warneckea is strongly supported (bootstrap proportion of 100%), as is a subclade comprising the eastern and southern African species of section Warneckea, including W. sousae and the populations from South Africa and extreme southern Mozambique (bootstrap 97%). The analysis strongly suggests (bootstrap 99%) that W. mouririifolia (a Kenyan endemic) is the sister species of W. sousae (northern Mozambique). These two taxa are in turn sister (bootstrap 87%) to a strongly supported clade (bootstrap 100%) comprising the populations from Tembe Elephant Park (South Africa) and Licuati Forest Reserve (Mozambique), hereafter referred to W. parvifolia sp. nov., plus two populations of an undetermined Warneckea species from northern Mozambique (represented by Luke 10155, CAS, EA and Luke 134735, EA). Although support for the monophyly of W. parvifolia is relatively weak (bootstrap 65%) in the combined analysis (Fig. 1), stronger support for this hypothesis is provided in the separate ETS and ITS1 analyses (bootstrap 88% and 81%, respectively; results not shown). Only in the separate ITS2 analysis was W. parvifolia not exclusively monophyletic, but this was weakly supported (53% bootstrap for a grouping of Ntetha 3 from Tembe and Luke 10155 from northern Mozambique; results not shown). Licuati population, while at Tembe there was more leaf-size variation observed on individual plants. Relatively large leaves 26−53 mm long × 14−36 mm wide were found in three samples from Tembe (Ntetha et al. 3 & 4, NU; Moll & Müller 5690, NH [2nd sheet only; the 1st & 3rd sheets of this collection have smaller leaves]). Ntetha et al. 2 (NU) is noteworthy for having small leaves and somewhat larger leaves on different branchlets of the same specimen. Of 160 internodes measured in W. sousae, 94% had lengths in the range of 10−60 mm. In W. parvifolia there were 547 internodes measured, with 69% ranging in length from 5−15 mm and 94% ranging from 5−25 mm. Further differences in floral and fruit dimensions between W. sousae and W. parvifolia are discussed below (Section 5.3). 4. Discussion Our null hypothesis was that the Warneckea populations in Tembe Elephant Park and Licuati Forest Reserve represent a small-leaved form of W. sousae, as treated by previous authors (Ross, 1976; A.E. van Wyk in Coates Palgrave, 2002). If this were true, then the smallerleaved plants should share a recent common ancestor with W. sousae, to the exclusion of other species. Our phylogenetic analysis of combined ETS, ITS1 and ITS2 sequence data (Fig. 1) is not consistent with this scenario: although both groups of populations are placed within the same clade, W. sousae is well supported as sister to W. mouririifolia, with these two taxa in turn sister to a well-supported clade comprising the Tembe and Licuati plants plus two as-yet undetermined populations from northern Mozambique. At the morphological level, we have found statistically significant differences in leaf dimensions and internode length between typical W. sousae and the plants from Tembe and Licuati (Table 3), although substantial overlap is seen in the ranges of these characteristics. From the molecular and morphological evidence presented thus far, one possible taxonomic conclusion is that W. sousae has been incorrectly treated as distinct from W. mouririifolia, and that all of the populations previously referred to W. sousae (including the plants from Tembe and Licuati) should be included within an expanded circumscription of W. mouririifolia. However, W. mouririifolia clearly differs from W. sousae in having leaf apices gradually and obtusely subacuminate or angustate (not rounded or shortly acuminate, the acumen broad and obtuse), inflorescences axillary and 3−5-flowered (vs flowers in dense glomerules at the defoliated nodes of the older branchlets), peduncles 1−6 mm long (vs inflorescences sessile), and flowers sessile (vs flowers on pedicels 1−4 mm long). Furthermore, our molecular analysis (Fig. 1) strongly suggests that W. mouririifolia, W. sousae, and the populations from Tembe and Licuati represent distinct evolutionary lineages and should not be construed as interpopulational variation within a single species. We thus conclude that the Warneckea populations from Tembe and Licuati are a distinct species which needs to be formally described and named. This new taxon is morphologically similar to W. sousae but is diagnosably different (see Section 5.3). 5. Species description 3.3. Morphological analyses 5.1. Warneckea parvifolia R.D. Stone & Ntetha, sp. nov. Between W. sousae and W. parvifolia the mean leaf width and logtransformed leaf length and internode length were significantly different (Table 3). However, considerable overlap in leaf dimensions and internode length was also observed (Figs. 2 and 3). Of 82 leaves measured in W. sousae, 71% had dimensions in the range of 40−76 mm long × 22−61 mm wide, while in W. parvifolia there were 281 leaves measured with 81% ranging from 14−32 mm long × 5−22 mm wide. In two samples of W. sousae (Ward 7970, NU; Timberlake et al. 5632, BNRH), a few smaller leaves 21−30 mm long × 16−18 mm wide were found. In W. parvifolia, only plants with small leaves 10−26 mm long × 5−17 mm wide were seen in the Type: South Africa. KwaZulu-Natal, 2732 (Ubombo): Tembe Elephant Park (–AB), 3 Sep 1987, M.C. Ward 2091 (PRU, holo.; NH, iso.). Evergreen shrub or small tree, 2.5–6 m tall; bark of trunk and older branches greyish white, finely longitudinally fissured; young branchlets quadrangular to narrowly quadrangular-alate or bisulcate in section, pale reddish brown, with age becoming greyish white and terete; internodes mostly 5–25 mm long. Leaves (sub)coriaceous; petioles (0.5–) 1–1.5 (–2) mm long; blades elliptic to ovate, (10–)14–32(–53) × (5–)8–19(–36) mm, base cuneate to rounded or narrowly subcordate, apex rounded to shortly and obtusely 321 R.D. Stone, N.A. Ntetha / South African Journal of Botany 88 (2013) 317–325 Fig. 1. Outgroup-rooted maximum-likelihood tree from combined, mixed-model analysis of ETS, ITS1, and ITS2 sequences plus binary-recoded gaps. Numbers above branches indicate maximum-likelihood bootstrap proportions (values b 50% not shown). The scale bar represents the average number of nucleotide substitutions per site. acuminate, dark green above, paler beneath, longitudinally 3-nerved from base (or the larger leaves with an additional pair of weak, submarginal nerves), with 6−13 pairs of transverse veins, midnerve and lateral nerves impressed on upper surface, prominent on lower surface. Flowers in dense glomerules at defoliated nodes of older branchlets (rarely in leaf-axils), white, subsessile; pedicels concealed by bracts in bud, 0.5–1 mm long at anthesis and 1–2.2 (−3) mm long after anthesis; bracts imbricate-decussate, depressed-ovate to rhombiform, scarious, 0.5–0.75 mm long, narrowed at base, keeled on abaxial surface and cucullate-apiculate. Hypanthium campanulate to cupulopatellate, ±1 mm long and 1.5–1.75 mm diam., calyx lobes broadly ovate to transversally elliptic or rhombic, 0.5 × 1 mm, cucullateapiculate and abaxially keeled, concealing corolla in bud. Petals spatulate-obovate, 2 × 1–1.3 mm, narrowly cuneate at base. Stamen filaments 3–4 mm long; anthers ±0.8 mm long, thecae frontally positioned, lacking dorsal connective-gland. Style filiform, 4–5 mm long. Flowering time September to October. Fruits globose, ± 8 mm diam., turning whitish but finally dark purple or almost black at maturity, crowned by persistent calyx lobes. Fruiting time November to December. Fig. 4. Table 3 Morphological attributes of Warneckea sousae and W. parvifolia (mean ± standard deviation) with associated results of an independent-samples t-test (d.f. = 27). (Prior to this test, the values for leaf length and internode length were logtransformed to meet the assumption of equality of variances.) Leaf length (cm) Leaf with (cm) Internode length (cm) W. sousae (n = 10) W. parvifolia (n = 19) Value of test statistic (t) p-value (2-tailed) 5.5 ± 1.5 3.5 ± 0.9 2.3 ± 0.8 2.4 ± 0.8 1.4 ± 0.6 1.4 ± 0.4 6.9 6.8 4.3 p b 0.001 p b 0.001 p b 0.001 322 R.D. Stone, N.A. Ntetha / South African Journal of Botany 88 (2013) 317–325 Fig. 2. Scatterplot of leaf dimensions in Warneckea sousae (⋄) and W. parvifolia (●). 5.2. Distribution and habitat Warneckea parvifolia is currently known from two populations, one in the 300-km2 Tembe Elephant Park in extreme northeastern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, and the second in the 33-km2 Licuati Forest Reserve in southernmost Mozambique (Fig. 5). At Tembe, it occupies the understorey of what has been called “short Sand Forest” (Matthews et al., 2001) but is conspicuously absent from areas of “tall Sand Forest.” It is locally common in the southwestern part of the park near Sihangwane, but elsewhere its occurrence is sporadic, with some sites of seemingly suitable habitat remaining unoccupied. The species was evidently not sampled in the phytosociological study of Gaugris (2008), which used small plots making it possible to overlook rare species. At Licuati, the species is frequently encountered within an extensive area of “sand-thicket” vegetation which rarely exceeds 5 m in height (Izidine et al., 2003). Satellite imagery of the coastal plain south of Delagoa Bay suggests there are additional, as-yet unsurveyed areas of sand-forest habitat existing outside of these formally protected areas (Google Earth, 2013). As a result, the overall extent and abundance of W. parvifolia remains unknown, although its status as a regionally endemic species is not in question. Within the Maputaland centre of floristic endemism (Van Wyk, 1996; Matthews et al., 2001; Van Wyk and Smith, 2001), sandforest has been characterised as a unique vegetation type occurring on ancient north–south trending sand dunes occupying the interior of the Mozambican coastal plain south of Delagoa Bay, at altitudes ranging from 50 to 120 m above sea level. At least 230 species and infraspecific taxa of plants have been documented as being endemic or near endemic to the Maputaland centre (Van Wyk, 1996). Of these Maputaland endemics, at least 27 taxa are restricted to sandforest, including W. parvifolia (Matthews et al., 2001, as Memecylon sousae). 5.3. Similar species and diagnostic characters Warneckea parvifolia is placed in W. section Warneckea (sensu Stone and Andreasen, 2010) by its combination of bark finely longitudinally fissured, inflorescences with persistent, imbricate-decussate bracts, flowers with well-developed calyx lobes concealing the corolla in bud, anther connective-gland absent, and embryo with just one fleshy cotyledon, the second obsolete. Warneckea parvifolia was previously included in W. sousae but is distinguished by its relatively short internodes mostly 5–25 mm long, smaller leaves mostly 14–32 × 8–19 mm on short petioles mostly 1–1.5 mm Fig. 3. Frequency distribution of internode lengths in Warneckea sousae ( ) and W. parvifolia (■). long, smaller flowers (hypanthium 1 mm long × 1.5–1.75 mm diam., calyx lobes 0.5 mm long, staminal filaments 3–4 mm long, style 4– 5 mm long), and globose fruit. In contrast, W. sousae has internodes mostly 10–45(–60) mm long, leaf-blades mostly 40–76 × 22–52 mm, larger flowers (hypanthium 1.5–2 mm long × 2 mm diam., calyx lobes ±0.75 mm long, staminal filaments 5 mm long, style 9 mm long), and mature fruit obovoid 9 × 7 mm. Petioles 2−6 mm long are seen in several collections of W. sousae, including the type, but in other material (Burrows 10772 & 11240, BNRH; Ward 7970, NU, UDW) the petioles are consistently shorter, 1.5−2.5 mm, thus approaching those of W. parvifolia. Warneckea parvifolia occurs well south of W. sousae sensu stricto, which ranges from Sofala Province in central Mozambique northward to the Pwani Region and Mafia Island in Tanzania (Fig. 5). The known populations of these species are separated from each other by a distance of at least 750 km. Warneckea sousae has been reported to occur on Inhaca Island near Maputo in southern Mozambique (Fernandes and Fernandes, 1972), based on Davidson 156 (SRGH), but we consider this report to be tentative since we have not seen the specimen. Among other members of W. section Warneckea, W. parvifolia is most similar to W. sessilicarpa (A. Fern. & R. Fern.) Jacq.-Fél., known from two coastal sites in northern Mozambique (Fig. 5). Both species have relatively short internodes and small, short-petioled leaves, and dense, few- to many-flowered fascicles at the thickened nodes of the upper branchlets. Warneckea sessilicarpa differs in having flowers and fruits sessile (vs. pedicels 1−3 mm long in W. parvifolia). Warneckea sessilicarpa has also been reported from Madagascar (Jacques-Félix, 1985a,b), but further analysis has shown that the resemblance of these populations to the Mozambican species is only superficial, and the Madagascan plants will be described as a distinct species (R.D. Stone, unpublished results). Our molecular phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1) allies W. parvifolia with two populations of an as-yet undetermined Warneckea species from Cabo Delgado Province in northern Mozambique (represented by Luke 10155, CAS, EA; Luke 134735, EA). These populations have larger leaves resembling those of W. sousae and appear to represent a new species, but additional collections of fertile material are needed before it can be fully described. 5.4. Etymology The species name parvifolia means “with small leaves.” In the revised edition of Trees of Southern Africa, the vernacular name is given as “Tonga false rose-apple” (Van Wyk in Coates Palgrave, 2002), in reference to the R.D. Stone, N.A. Ntetha / South African Journal of Botany 88 (2013) 317–325 Thonga people who historically inhabited the coastal plain south of Delagoa Bay. However, this name is no longer favoured by the local inhabitants, and has been abandoned in favour of Maputaland (Van Wyk, 1996; Van Wyk and Smith, 2001; Gaugris, 2008). We suggest the alternative vernacular name “Maputaland false rose-apple.” 5.5. Conservation status During our field work at Tembe in June 2012, every Warneckea plant we observed showed signs of resprouting or coppicing after being utilised by elephants. The park boundaries have been fenced since 1989, limiting the movement of elephants and increasing their utilisation of sand-forest habitats with which they previously had no close association (Matthews et al., 2001; Gaugris, 2008). The utilisation of seedlings and saplings by smaller browsing animals might also limit future recruitment of woody plants at Tembe (Gaugris, 2008). However, without longterm monitoring there is really no evidence that elephants or other herbivores are responsible for the currently rather spotty distribution of W. parvifolia at Tembe. 323 Warneckea parvifolia is more abundant at Licuati where no elephant utilisation was observed, but this forest reserve is not very well protected against anthropogenic threats (Izidine et al., 2003). Warneckea parvifolia is known to exist at fewer than five locations with an extent of occurrence estimated to be greater than 100 km2 but much less than 5000 km2. In addition, future declines in its area of occupancy and degradation of its sand-forest habitat are projected in Tembe Elephant Park as a result of utilisation by elephants. A conservation status of Endangered (EN) B1a, b(ii, iii) is therefore recommended for W. parvifolia according to IUCN (2001) criteria. 5.6. Additional specimens examined South Africa. KWAZULU-NATAL: 2632 (Bela Vista): 7 km west of Muzi (–DC), 24 Oct 1971, Moll & Nel 5592 (K, MO, PRE); 6 km W of Muzi (–CD), 7 Jun 1972, Moll & Müller 5690 (K, NH [3 sheets], NU, herb. Umtamvuna); Tembe Elephant Park (–CD), 25 Oct 1988, M.C. Ward 2406 (NH); Tembe Elephant Park (–DC), 7 Jun 1995, P. van Wyk BSA_2986 (PRU); Tembe Elephant Park, north-east quadrant Fig. 4. Warneckea parvifolia. (A) Flowering branch; (B–C) leaves; (D) detail of lower leaf surface; (E) flower; (F) fruiting branch; (G) fruit, longitudinal section; (H) seed. Voucher specimens: (A–B, D–E) M.C. Ward 2091, NH; (C) Moll & Nel 5592, K; (F–H) Burrows et al. 11517, BNRH. Scale: (A–C, F) 10 mm; (D, G–H) 4 mm; (E) 1 mm. 324 R.D. Stone, N.A. Ntetha / South African Journal of Botany 88 (2013) 317–325 Fig. 5. Distribution of selected Warneckea species in southern Africa, based on herbarium records from BNRH, CAS, EA, K, LISC, LMA, LMU, MO, NH, NU, PRE, PRU, and UDW. ▲ — W. sousae; ★ — W. sessilicarpa; ● — W. parvifolia. (–DC), 13 June 2012, Ntetha et al. 2 & 3 (NU); Tembe Elephant Park, north-west quadrant (–CD), 13 June 2012, Ntetha et al. 4 (NU). 2732 (Ubombo): Ingwavuma district, Manungwane forest, NE of Sihangwane store (–AA), 6 Feb 1964, Tinley 920 (NH); Tembe Elephant Reserve, Sihangwane (–AB), 21 Jun 1984, Lawson 660 (NH); Tembe Elephant Park (–AB), 11 Nov 1987, M.C. Ward 2236 (PRU); Tembe Elephant Park, south-west quadrant near water tower (–AB), 13 June 2012, Ntetha et al. 1 (NU). Mozambique. MAPUTO: 2632 (Bela Vista): ‘Bela Vista para Porto Henrique, lado esquerdo da estrada, andados 4 km’ [4 km from Bela Vista, left side of the road to Porto Henrique] (–CB), 30 Oct 1980, De Koning & Nuvunga 8537 (K, LMU [n.v.]); Licuati Forest Reserve, Licuati thicket (–AD), 2003, Izidine 144 (PRU); Licuati Forest Reserve, Licuati thicket campsite (–AD), 27 Aug 2006, J.E. Burrows & S.M. Burrows 9486 (BNRH); Licuati Forest Reserve, Licuati thicket (–AD), 11 Dec 2009, J.E. Burrows et al. 11517 (BNRH, NU); Licuati Forest Reserve, Licuati thicket (–AD), 21 Nov 2010, J.E. Burrows & S.M. Burrows 12050 (BNRH). Acknowledgements We thank Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife for a collecting permit and for providing accommodation and logistical support during the fieldwork in Tembe Elephant Park. Additional leaf material for DNA analysis was kindly contributed by Quentin Luke and John Burrows. Curators of the following herbaria provided access to or loans of specimens: BNRH, K, LMA, LMU, MO, NH, NU, PRE, PRU, UDW, Umtamvuna. Richard Boon supplied information on the distribution and abundance of Warneckea at Tembe, and Sandie Burrows rendered the line drawing. Funding for this study was provided by a UKZN Competitive Research Grant (to R.D.S.). References Baldwin, B.G., 2000. Roles for modern plant systematics in discovery and conservation of fine-scale biodiversity. Madrono 47, 219–229. Baldwin, B.G., Markos, S., 1998. Phylogenetic utility of the external transcribed spacer (ETS) of 18S–26S rDNA: congruence of ETS and ITS trees of Calycadenia (Compositae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10, 449–463. Baldwin, B.G., Sanderson, M.J., Porter, J.M., Wojciechowski, M.F., Campbell, C.S., Donoghue, M.J., 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 82, 247–277. Bull, J.J., Huelsenbeck, J.P., Cunningham, C.W., Swofford, D.L., Waddell, P.J., 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42, 384–397. Chase, M.W., Hills, H.H., 1991. Silica gel: an ideal material for field preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies. Taxon 40, 215–220. Coates Palgrave, M. (Ed.), 2002. Trees of Southern Africa, third ed. Struik, Cape Town. de Queiroz, A., 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Syst. Biol. 42, 368–372. de Queiroz, A., Donoghue, M.J., Kim, J., 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26, 657–681. Felsenstein, J., 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791. Fernandes, A., Fernandes, R., 1972. Melastomataceae africanae novae vel minus cognitae–VI. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana, sér. 2, 46, pp. 63–71 (+ 6 plates). Gaugris, J.Y., 2008. The impacts of herbivores and humans on the utilisation of woody resources in conserved versus non-conserved land in Maputaland, northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. (Ph.D. dissertation) University of Pretoria. Google Earth (version 7.0.3.8542), 2013. Image details: coastal plain of Indian Ocean south of Maputo, Mozambique; eye altitude 163.87 km; co-ordinates 25°54′–27°21′S, 31°45′–33°00′E. Data set: U.S. Dept. of State Geographer Image Landsat, AfriGIS (Pty) Ltd., SIO, NOAA, U.S. Navy, NGA, GEBCO. [online] Available through: http:// www.google.com/earth/index.html [Accessed 27 June 2013]. Hershkovitz, M.A., Zimmer, E.A., Hahn, W.J., 1999. Ribosomal DNA sequences and angiosperm systematics. In: Hollingsworth, P.M., Bateman, R.M., Gornall, R.J. (Eds.), Molecular Systematics and Plant Evolution. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 268–326. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Bull, J.J., Cunningham, C.W., 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 152–158. IUCN, 2001. The IUCN red list categories and criteria: version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission.IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K. Izidine, S., Siebert, S., Van Wyk, A.E., 2003. Maputaland's Licuati forest and thicket: botanical exploration of the coastal plain south of Maputo Bay, with an emphasis on the Licuati Forest Reserve. Veld Flora 89, 56–61. R.D. Stone, N.A. Ntetha / South African Journal of Botany 88 (2013) 317–325 Jacques-Félix, H., 1985a. Les Memecyleae (Melastomataceae) de Madagascar (2e partie). Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. B, Adansonia 7, 3–58. Jacques-Félix, H., 1985b. Les Memecyleae (Melastomataceae) de Madagascar (1re partie). Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. B, Adansonia 6, 383–451 (dated 1984, published 1985). Matthews, W.S., Van Wyk, A.E., van Rooyen, N., Botha, G.A., 2001. Vegetation of the Tembe Elephant Park, Maputaland, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 67, 573–594. Morrison, D.A., 2006. Multiple sequence alignment for phylogenetic purposes. Aust. Syst. Bot. 19, 479–539. Posada, D., 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1253–1256. Ross, J.H., 1976. Notes on African plants (Melastomataceae): a new Memecylon record from Tongaland. Bothalia 12, 64. Simmons, M.P., 2004. Independence of alignment and tree search. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31, 874–879. 325 Simmons, M.P., Ochoterena, H., 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49, 369–381. Stone, R.D., 2006. Phylogeny of major lineages in Melastomataceae, subfamily Olisbeoideae: utility of nuclear glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GapC) gene sequences. Syst. Bot. 31, 107–121. Stone, R.D., Andreasen, K., 2010. The Afro-Madagascan genus Warneckea (Melastomataceae): molecular systematics and revised infrageneric classification. Taxon 59, 83–92. Van Wyk, A.E., 1996. Biodiversity of the Maputaland Centre. In: Van der Maesen, L.J.G., Van der Burgt, X.M., Van Medebach de Rooy, J.M. (Eds.), The Biodiversity of African Plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 198–207. Van Wyk, A.E., Smith, G., 2001. Regions of Floristic Endemism in Southern Africa. Umdaus Press, Hatfield. Zwickl, D.J., 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. (Ph.D. dissertation) University of Texas, Austin.