18.08.2013 Views

Micropropagation and medicinal properties of Barleria greenii

Micropropagation and medicinal properties of Barleria greenii

Micropropagation and medicinal properties of Barleria greenii

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MICROPROPAGATION AND MEDICINAL PROPERTIES OF<br />

BARLERIA GREENII AND HUERNIA HYSTRIX<br />

BY<br />

STEPHEN OLUWASEUN AMOO<br />

(M.Sc. OBAFEMI AWOLOWO UNIVERSITY, NIGERIA)<br />

Submitted in fulfilment <strong>of</strong> the requirements for the degree <strong>of</strong><br />

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY<br />

Research Centre for Plant Growth <strong>and</strong> Development<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Biological <strong>and</strong> Conservation Sciences<br />

University <strong>of</strong> KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg<br />

November 2009


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

STUDENT DECLARATION ................................................................................... vii<br />

DECLARATION BY SUPERVISORS ................................................................... viii<br />

FACULTY OF SCIENCE & AGRICULTURE DECLARATION 1 - PLAGIARISM.... ix<br />

FACULTY OF SCIENCE & AGRICULTURE DECLARATION 2 - PUBLICATIONS x<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................... xii<br />

LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................... xiii<br />

LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................xvii<br />

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................. xix<br />

ABSTRACT….. ....................................................................................................xxii<br />

Chapter 1 General introduction ........................................................................ 1<br />

1.1 Use <strong>of</strong> plants in horticulture <strong>and</strong> traditional medicine .......................... 1<br />

1.2 The need for conservation <strong>of</strong> plant species ........................................... 1<br />

1.3 Distribution, morphology, uses <strong>and</strong> conservation status <strong>of</strong> the<br />

studied plant species ............................................................................... 3<br />

1.3.1 <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong> .................................................................................... 3<br />

1.3.2. Huernia hystrix..................................................................................... 5<br />

1.4 Value <strong>of</strong> tissue culture ............................................................................. 7<br />

1.5 Aims <strong>and</strong> objectives ................................................................................. 8<br />

1.6 General overview <strong>of</strong> the thesis ................................................................ 8<br />

Chapter 2 Literature review ............................................................................ 10<br />

2.1 <strong>Micropropagation</strong> ................................................................................... 10<br />

2.1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 10<br />

2.1.2 Stage 0: Selection <strong>and</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> mother plants ......................... 10<br />

2.1.3 Stage I: Initiation <strong>and</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> aseptic culture ...................... 11<br />

ii


2.1.4 Stage II: Proliferation or multiplication <strong>of</strong> propagules ......................... 15<br />

2.1.5 Stage III: Preparation <strong>of</strong> propagules for transfer to soil ..................... 17<br />

2.1.6 Stage IV: In vivo rooting <strong>and</strong> acclimatization for soil establishment... 19<br />

2.1.7 Effects <strong>of</strong> auxins <strong>and</strong> cytokinins on plant regeneration in<br />

micropropagation ............................................................................. 22<br />

2.1.8 Environmental factors affecting micropropagation ............................. 29<br />

2.1.8.1 Light ............................................................................................... 29<br />

2.1.8.2 Temperature ................................................................................... 31<br />

2.1.9 Tissue culture <strong>of</strong> the families: Acanthaceae <strong>and</strong> Asclepiadaceae ..... 32<br />

2.2 Pharmacological <strong>and</strong> phytochemical investigation <strong>of</strong> plant extracts 36<br />

2.2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 36<br />

2.2.2 Antimicrobial activity .......................................................................... 37<br />

2.2.3 Anti-inflammatory activity ................................................................... 39<br />

2.2.4 Acetylcholinesterase inhibition .......................................................... 42<br />

2.2.5 Antioxidant activity ............................................................................. 43<br />

2.2.6 Phytochemical property ..................................................................... 45<br />

Chapter 3 In vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong> ........................................ 48<br />

3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 48<br />

3.2 Materials <strong>and</strong> methods ........................................................................... 49<br />

3.2.1 Explant decontamination, selection <strong>and</strong> bulking ................................ 49<br />

3.2.2 Effects <strong>of</strong> BA <strong>and</strong> NAA on shoot multiplication .................................. 50<br />

3.2.3 Effects <strong>of</strong> types <strong>and</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> cytokinins on shoot<br />

multiplication .................................................................................... 50<br />

3.2.4 Effects <strong>of</strong> photoperiod on shoot multiplication ................................... 51<br />

3.2.5 In vitro rooting <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots ................................................ 51<br />

3.2.6 Ex vitro rooting <strong>and</strong> acclimatization ................................................... 52<br />

3.2.7 Data analyses .................................................................................... 52<br />

iii


3.3 Results <strong>and</strong> discussion ......................................................................... 53<br />

3.3.1 Explant decontamination ................................................................... 54<br />

3.3.2 Effects <strong>of</strong> BA <strong>and</strong> NAA on shoot multiplication .................................. 55<br />

3.3.3 Effects <strong>of</strong> types <strong>and</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> cytokinins on shoot<br />

multiplication .................................................................................... 58<br />

3.3.4 Effects <strong>of</strong> photoperiod on shoot multiplication ................................... 62<br />

3.3.5 In vitro rooting <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots ................................................ 63<br />

3.3.6 Ex vitro rooting <strong>and</strong> acclimatization ................................................... 65<br />

Chapter 4 In vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix ........................................ 67<br />

4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 67<br />

4.2 Materials <strong>and</strong> methods ........................................................................... 69<br />

4.2.1 Source material, decontamination <strong>and</strong> bulking <strong>of</strong> explants ................ 69<br />

4.2.2 Effects <strong>of</strong> BA <strong>and</strong> NAA on shoot multiplication .................................. 69<br />

4.2.3 Effects <strong>of</strong> temperature <strong>and</strong> photoperiod on shoot multiplication ........ 70<br />

4.2.4 Determination <strong>of</strong> titratable acidity ...................................................... 70<br />

4.2.5 Effects <strong>of</strong> culture vessel size on shoot multiplication ......................... 71<br />

4.2.6 Indirect organogenesis ...................................................................... 71<br />

4.2.7 Rooting <strong>and</strong> acclimatization ............................................................... 71<br />

4.2.8 Data analyses .................................................................................... 72<br />

4.3 Results <strong>and</strong> discussion ......................................................................... 72<br />

4.3.1 Explant decontamination ................................................................... 72<br />

4.3.2 Shoot <strong>and</strong> root organogenesis .......................................................... 74<br />

4.3.3 Effects <strong>of</strong> temperature <strong>and</strong> photoperiod on shoot multiplication ........ 77<br />

4.3.4 Titratable acidity ................................................................................ 82<br />

4.3.5 Effects <strong>of</strong> culture vessel size on shoot multiplication ......................... 84<br />

4.3.6 Indirect organogenesis ...................................................................... 86<br />

4.3.7 Rooting <strong>and</strong> acclimatization ............................................................... 87<br />

iv


Chapter 5 Pharmacological <strong>and</strong> phytochemical evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

species <strong>and</strong> Huernia hystrix ......................................................... 90<br />

5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 90<br />

5.2 Materials <strong>and</strong> methods ........................................................................... 91<br />

5.2.1 Collection <strong>of</strong> plant materials .............................................................. 91<br />

5.2.2 Pharmacological evaluation ............................................................... 92<br />

5.2.2.1 Preparation <strong>of</strong> extracts ................................................................... 92<br />

5.2.2.2 Antibacterial activity ....................................................................... 92<br />

5.2.2.3 Antifungal activity ........................................................................... 93<br />

5.2.2.4 Anti-inflammatory activity ............................................................... 94<br />

5.2.2.5 Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition........................................... 95<br />

5.2.2.6 Antioxidant activity ......................................................................... 96<br />

5.2.2.6.1 DPPH radical-scavenging activity ............................................. 96<br />

5.2.2.6.2 Ferric reducing power activity .................................................... 97<br />

5.2.2.6.3 β-Carotene linoleic acid assay .................................................. 97<br />

5.2.3 Phytochemical evaluation .................................................................. 98<br />

5.2.3.1 Preparation <strong>of</strong> extracts ................................................................... 98<br />

5.2.3.2 Total phenolic content .................................................................... 98<br />

5.2.3.3 Total iridoid content ........................................................................ 99<br />

5.2.3.4 Flavonoid content ........................................................................... 99<br />

5.2.3.5 Gallotannin content ...................................................................... 100<br />

5.2.3.6 Condensed tannin (proanthocyanidin) content ............................. 100<br />

5.2.4 Data analyses .................................................................................. 101<br />

5.3 Results <strong>and</strong> discussion ....................................................................... 101<br />

5.3.1 Yield <strong>of</strong> plant extracts ...................................................................... 101<br />

5.3.2 Pharmacological evaluation ............................................................. 101<br />

5.3.2.1 Antibacterial activity ..................................................................... 101<br />

v


5.3.2.2 Antifungal activity ......................................................................... 107<br />

5.3.2.3 Anti-inflammatory activity ............................................................. 110<br />

5.3.2.4 Acetylcholinesterase inhibition ..................................................... 112<br />

5.3.2.5 Antioxidant activity ....................................................................... 115<br />

5.3.2.5.1 DPPH radical scavenging activity ............................................ 115<br />

5.3.2.5.2 Ferric ion reducing power activity ............................................ 118<br />

5.3.2.5.3 β-Carotene linoleic acid assay ................................................ 120<br />

5.3.3.1 Total phenolic content .................................................................. 124<br />

5.3.3.2 Total iridoid content ...................................................................... 126<br />

5.3.3.3 Flavonoid content ......................................................................... 128<br />

5.3.3.4 Gallotannin content ...................................................................... 130<br />

5.3.3.5 Condensed tannin (proanthocyanidin) content ............................. 132<br />

Chapter 6 General conclusions .................................................................... 134<br />

References ....................................................................................................... 137<br />

vi


STUDENT DECLARATION<br />

<strong>Micropropagation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>medicinal</strong> <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Huernia hystrix<br />

I, Stephen Oluwaseun Amoo, Student Number 205527320<br />

declare that:<br />

(i) The research reported in this dissertation, except where otherwise<br />

indicated, is the result <strong>of</strong> my own endeavours in the Research Centre for<br />

Plant Growth <strong>and</strong> Development, School <strong>of</strong> Biological <strong>and</strong> Conservation<br />

Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg;<br />

(ii) This dissertation has not been submitted for any degrees or examination<br />

at any other University;<br />

(iii) This thesis does not contain data, figures or writing, unless specifically<br />

acknowledged, copied from other researchers; <strong>and</strong><br />

(iv) Where I have reproduced a publication <strong>of</strong> which I am an author or co-<br />

author, I have indicated which part <strong>of</strong> the publication was contributed by<br />

me.<br />

Signed at Pietermaritzburg on the...…. day <strong>of</strong> March, 2010.<br />

__________________________<br />

SIGNATURE<br />

vii


DECLARATION BY SUPERVISORS<br />

We hereby declare that we acted as Supervisors for this PhD student:<br />

Student’s Full Name: Stephen Oluwaseun Amoo<br />

Student Number: 205527320<br />

Thesis Title: <strong>Micropropagation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>medicinal</strong> <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Huernia hystrix<br />

Regular consultation took place between the student <strong>and</strong> ourselves throughout the<br />

investigation. We advised the student to the best <strong>of</strong> our ability <strong>and</strong> approved the<br />

final document for submission to the Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science <strong>and</strong> Agriculture Higher<br />

Degrees Office for examination by the University appointed Examiners.<br />

__________________________<br />

SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR J VAN STADEN<br />

________________________<br />

CO-SUPERVISOR: DR JF FINNIE<br />

viii


FACULTY OF SCIENCE & AGRICULTURE DECLARATION 1 -<br />

I, Stephen Oluwaseun Amoo, declare that<br />

PLAGIARISM<br />

1. The research reported in this thesis, except where otherwise indicated,<br />

is my original research.<br />

2. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any<br />

other university.<br />

3. This thesis does not contain other persons‟ data, pictures, graphs or<br />

other information, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced<br />

from other persons.<br />

4. This thesis does not contain other persons' writing, unless specifically<br />

acknowledged as being sourced from other researchers. Where other<br />

written sources have been quoted, then:<br />

a. Their words have been re-written but the general information<br />

attributed to them has been referenced<br />

b. Where their exact words have been used, then their writing has been<br />

placed in italics <strong>and</strong> inside quotation marks, <strong>and</strong> referenced.<br />

5. This thesis does not contain text, graphics or tables copied <strong>and</strong> pasted<br />

Signed<br />

from the Internet, unless specifically acknowledged, <strong>and</strong> the source<br />

being detailed in the thesis <strong>and</strong> in the References sections.<br />

………………………………………………………………………………<br />

Declaration Plagiarism 22/05/08 FHDR Approved<br />

ix


FACULTY OF SCIENCE & AGRICULTURE DECLARATION 2 -<br />

PUBLICATIONS<br />

PUBLISHED ARTICLES FROM THIS THESIS<br />

AMOO, S.O., FINNIE, J.F. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J. 2009. Effects <strong>of</strong><br />

temperature, photoperiod <strong>and</strong> culture vessel size on adventitious shoot<br />

production <strong>of</strong> in vitro propagated Huernia hystrix. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong><br />

Organ Culture 99: 233-238<br />

Contribution: Experimental work <strong>and</strong> writing <strong>of</strong> publication done by the first<br />

author under the supervision <strong>of</strong> the last two authors.<br />

AMOO, S.O., FINNIE, J.F. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J. 2009. In vitro<br />

pharmacological evaluation <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Ethnopharmacology 121: 274-277<br />

Contribution: Experimental work <strong>and</strong> writing <strong>of</strong> publication done by the first<br />

author under the supervision <strong>of</strong> the last two authors.<br />

AMOO, S.O., FINNIE, J.F. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J. 2009. In vitro<br />

propagation <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix: an endangered <strong>medicinal</strong> <strong>and</strong> ornamental<br />

succulent. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ Culture 96: 273-278<br />

Contribution: Experimental work <strong>and</strong> writing <strong>of</strong> publication done by the first<br />

author under the supervision <strong>of</strong> the last two authors.<br />

CONFERENCE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THIS THESIS<br />

AMOO, S.O., FINNIE, J.F. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J. 2008. In vitro<br />

pharmacological evaluation <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species. Joint Conference <strong>of</strong><br />

the 34 th South African Association <strong>of</strong> Botanists (SAAB) <strong>and</strong> 7 th Southern<br />

African Society <strong>of</strong> Systematic Biology (SASSB). Drakensville Mountain<br />

Resort, South Africa. (Oral presentation by the first author)<br />

x


AMOO, S.O., FINNIE, J.F. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J. 2009. <strong>Micropropagation</strong><br />

Signed<br />

<strong>of</strong> an endangered valuable succulent: Huernia hystrix. 35 th Annual<br />

Conference <strong>of</strong> the South African Association <strong>of</strong> Botanists (SAAB) <strong>and</strong><br />

International workshop on “Phosphate as a limiting resource”. Stellenbosch<br />

University, South Africa. (Oral presentation by the first author)<br />

………………………………………………………………………………<br />

Declaration Publications FHDR 22/05/08 Approved<br />

xi


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

I would like to express a special appreciation to my supervisor, Pr<strong>of</strong> J. van Staden<br />

for his invaluable support, guidance <strong>and</strong> encouragement throughout the duration<br />

<strong>of</strong> this study. I am very grateful for the financial support he provided in the form <strong>of</strong><br />

a postgraduate bursary.<br />

Many thanks to my co-supervisor, Dr J.F. Finnie, for his constructive advice, as<br />

well as constant support <strong>and</strong> encouragement.<br />

My sincere thanks to all members <strong>of</strong> the Research Centre for Plant Growth <strong>and</strong><br />

Development, for their extensive support. The administrative staff (Mrs Magnussen<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mrs Warren) <strong>and</strong> my Research Committee members (Dr Bairu <strong>and</strong> Dr<br />

Elgorashi) are especially thanked for their support <strong>and</strong> inputs. My sincere<br />

appreciation to Dr Gary Stafford <strong>and</strong> Mrs Alison Young for their help in the<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> plants used in this study. Dr Gary Stafford also kindly supplied the<br />

Huernia hystrix flower used on the cover page. Thanks to my colleagues in the lab,<br />

especially Ashwell Ndhlala <strong>and</strong> Mack Moyo, with whom I shared many<br />

brainstorming sessions related to some aspects <strong>of</strong> this research. The technical<br />

assistance provided by Mr Hampton <strong>and</strong> his team in the use <strong>of</strong> some equipment<br />

are much appreciated.<br />

My special thanks to my parents <strong>and</strong> brother as well as Grace, Afolad, Folake <strong>and</strong><br />

Bunmi for their underst<strong>and</strong>ing, love, support <strong>and</strong> encouragement. I miss you all.<br />

Above all, glory, praise <strong>and</strong> honour to Jehovah God, the omnipotent <strong>and</strong><br />

omniscient one, for his indescribable free gift.<br />

xii


LIST OF FIGURES<br />

Chapter 1<br />

Figure 1.1: <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong>. (A) The plant during flowering (B) Calyx bearing the<br />

unopened, mature fruits (capsules). ................................................... 4<br />

Figure 1.2: Flowering Huernia hystrix potted in a small container. Bar = 10 mm. 6<br />

Chapter 2<br />

Figure 2.1: Molecular structures <strong>of</strong> some auxins commonly used in plant tissue<br />

culture. ............................................................................................. 23<br />

Figure 2.2: Molecular structures <strong>of</strong> some cytokinins commonly used in plant<br />

tissue culture. ................................................................................... 27<br />

Figure 2.3: The physiological <strong>and</strong> pathophysiological functions <strong>of</strong> COX-2 enzyme<br />

(STEINMEYER, 2000). .................................................................... 41<br />

Chapter 3<br />

Figure 3.1: In vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong>. (A) Stock plant. (B) Control<br />

(MS medium without PGR). (C) Shoot multiplication on MS medium<br />

supplemented with 3 µM BA. (D) Shoot multiplication on MS medium<br />

supplemented with 7 µM MemTR. (E) In vitro rooted regenerated<br />

shoot ready for acclimatization. (F) Three-month-old fully<br />

acclimatized plant. Bars = 10 mm. ................................................... 53<br />

Figure 3.2: Effects <strong>of</strong> sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution treatments on<br />

explants decontamination. ............................................................... 54<br />

Figure 3.3: Effects <strong>of</strong> BA <strong>and</strong> NAA on adventitious shoot production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

<strong>greenii</strong> after four weeks <strong>of</strong> culture. Bars with different letters are<br />

significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT. ....................... 56<br />

Figure 3.4: Effects <strong>of</strong> BA <strong>and</strong> NAA on adventitious shoot production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

<strong>greenii</strong> after six weeks <strong>of</strong> culture. Bars with different letters are<br />

significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT. ....................... 57<br />

Figure 3.5: Effects <strong>of</strong> half strength MS medium with or without IBA treatment on<br />

in vitro rooting <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots. Bars with different letters are<br />

significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT. ....................... 64<br />

xiii


Figure 3.6: Effects <strong>of</strong> pulsing with different IBA concentrations on ex vitro<br />

acclimatization <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots .............................................. 66<br />

Chapter 4<br />

Figure 4.1: In vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix. (A) Stock plant. (B) Control<br />

with root production (MS medium without plant growth regulators).<br />

(C) Multiple shoot production accompanied with root formation on MS<br />

medium supplemented with 5.37 µM NAA <strong>and</strong> 22.19 µM BA. (D)<br />

Two-month-old fully acclimatized plants (E) Green callus growth with<br />

root hairs on MS medium supplemented with 5.37 µM NAA. (F) Root<br />

regeneration from callus on MS medium supplemented with 2.69 µM<br />

NAA <strong>and</strong> 2.22 µM BA. Scale bar = 10 mm. ...................................... 73<br />

Figure 4.2: Frequencies <strong>of</strong> explants decontamination in different mercuric<br />

chloride solution treatments. ............................................................ 74<br />

Figure 4.3: Nocturnal titratable acidity in Huernia hystrix shoots cultured at<br />

different temperatures. 22:00, 02:00 <strong>and</strong> 06:00 h are the beginning,<br />

middle <strong>and</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 8 h dark period respectively. Bars with different<br />

letters are significantly different (Ρ = 0.05) according to DMRT. ...... 84<br />

Figure 4.4: Huernia hystrix adventitious shoot production from explants cultured<br />

in different culture vessels. (A) Screw cap jar [300 ml]. (B) Culture<br />

tube [40 ml]. Scale bar = 10 mm. ..................................................... 86<br />

Figure 4.5: Effects <strong>of</strong> combinations <strong>of</strong> NAA <strong>and</strong> BA concentrations on callus<br />

growth. Bars with different letters are significantly different (Ρ = 0.05)<br />

according to DMRT. ........................................................................... 87<br />

Chapter 5<br />

Figure 5.1: Anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> extracts from different parts <strong>of</strong> three<br />

<strong>Barleria</strong> species in COX-1 (on the left side) <strong>and</strong> COX-2 (on the right<br />

side) assays. B.p, B.a, <strong>and</strong> B.g are <strong>Barleria</strong> prionitis, B. albostellata<br />

<strong>and</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong>, respectively. (A) <strong>and</strong> (B) are PE extracts. (C) <strong>and</strong> (D)<br />

are DCM extracts. (E) <strong>and</strong> (F) are EtOH extracts. Bars in the same<br />

graph bearing different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05)<br />

according to DMRT. Percentage inhibition by indomethacin in COX-1<br />

was 63.4 ± 1.98 <strong>and</strong> COX-2 was 73.6 ± 1.47. ................................ 111<br />

xiv


Figure 5.2: Anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> different extracts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix. (A)<br />

COX-1 assay. (B) COX-2 assay. Bars with different letters in each<br />

graph are significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT.<br />

Percentage inhibition by indomethacin in COX-1 was 54.73 ± 2.00<br />

<strong>and</strong> COX-2 was 63.44 ± 2.52. ........................................................ 112<br />

Figure 5.3: Dose-dependent acetylcholinesterase inhibition by different parts <strong>of</strong><br />

three <strong>Barleria</strong> species. B.p = <strong>Barleria</strong> prionitis, B.g = <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong>,<br />

B.a = <strong>Barleria</strong> albostellata. Bars bearing different letters are<br />

significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT. The AChE<br />

inhibition activities by galanthamine at 0.5, 1.0 <strong>and</strong> 2 µM were 49.24,<br />

59.81 <strong>and</strong> 77.03%, respectively. .................................................... 113<br />

Figure 5.4: Dose-dependent acetylcholinesterase inhibition by different parts <strong>of</strong><br />

Huernia hystrix. Bars bearing different letters are significantly<br />

different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT. The AChE inhibition<br />

activities by galanthamine at 0.5, 1.0 <strong>and</strong> 2 µM were 49.24, 59.81<br />

<strong>and</strong> 77.03%, respectively. .............................................................. 114<br />

Figure 5.5: Dose-dependent curve <strong>of</strong> DPPH radical scavenging activity <strong>of</strong><br />

different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species. (A) Leaves (B) Stems (C)<br />

Roots. ............................................................................................. 116<br />

Figure 5.6: Dose-dependent curve <strong>of</strong> DPPH radical scavenging activity <strong>of</strong><br />

different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix. ................................................... 117<br />

Figure 5.7: Ferric ion reducing power activity <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

species. (A) Leaves (B) Stems (C) Roots. ..................................... 119<br />

Figure 5.8: Ferric ion reducing power activity <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix.<br />

....................................................................................................... 120<br />

Figure 5.9: Antioxidant activities <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species in β-<br />

carotene-linoleic acid model system. Bars bearing different letters in<br />

each graph are significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT.<br />

(A) Antioxidant activity (ANT) based on the average β-carotene<br />

bleaching rate. (B) Oxidation rate ratio (ORR). (C) Antioxidant activity<br />

(AA) at t = 60 min. (D) Antioxidant activity (AA) at t = 120 min. ...... 122<br />

Figure 5.10: Antioxidant activities <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix in β-<br />

carotene-linoleic acid model system. Bars bearing different letters in<br />

each graph are significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT.<br />

xv


(A) Antioxidant activity (ANT) based on the average β-carotene<br />

bleaching rate. (B) Oxidation rate ratio. (C) Antioxidant activity at 60<br />

min. (D) Antioxidant activity at 120 min. ......................................... 123<br />

Figure 5.11: Total phenolic content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species.<br />

Bars bearing different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05)<br />

according to DMRT. ....................................................................... 125<br />

Figure 5.12: Total phenolic content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix. Bars<br />

bearing different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05) according<br />

to DMRT. ........................................................................................ 125<br />

Figure 5.13: Total iridoid content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species. Bars<br />

bearing different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05) according<br />

to DMRT. ........................................................................................ 127<br />

Figure 5.14: Total iridoid content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix. Bars bearing<br />

different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05) according to<br />

DMRT. ............................................................................................ 127<br />

Figure 5.15: Flavonoid content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species. Bars<br />

bearing different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05) according<br />

to DMRT. ........................................................................................ 129<br />

Figure 5.16: Flavonoid content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix. Bars bearing<br />

different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05) according to<br />

DMRT. ............................................................................................ 129<br />

Figure 5.17: Gallotannin content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species. Bars<br />

bearing different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05) according<br />

to DMRT. ........................................................................................ 131<br />

Figure 5.18: Gallotannin content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix. Bars bearing<br />

different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05) according to<br />

DMRT. ............................................................................................ 131<br />

Figure 5.19: Condensed tannin content (as leucocyanidin equivalents) <strong>of</strong> different<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species. Bars bearing different letters are<br />

significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT. ..................... 132<br />

xvi


LIST OF TABLES<br />

Chapter 2<br />

Table 2.1: List <strong>of</strong> some tissue cultured plant species in the Acanthaceae <strong>and</strong><br />

Asclepiadaceae families ..................................................................... 33<br />

Chapter 3<br />

Table 3.1: Effects <strong>of</strong> types <strong>and</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> cytokinins on adventitious shoot<br />

production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong> ............................................................. 60<br />

Table 3.2: Effects <strong>of</strong> photoperiod on adventitious shoot production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

<strong>greenii</strong> after six weeks <strong>of</strong> culture ........................................................ 63<br />

Chapter 4<br />

Table 4.1: Effects <strong>of</strong> different combinations <strong>of</strong> NAA <strong>and</strong> BA on shoot <strong>and</strong> root<br />

regeneration <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix after nine weeks <strong>of</strong> culture ............... 75<br />

Table 4.2: Frequencies <strong>of</strong> shoot, root <strong>and</strong> basal callus production from treatments<br />

with different concentration combinations <strong>of</strong> NAA <strong>and</strong> BA ................. 76<br />

Table 4.3: Effects <strong>of</strong> different concentration combinations <strong>of</strong> NAA <strong>and</strong> BA on<br />

fresh weights <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots <strong>and</strong> roots produced per explant 78<br />

Table 4.4: Effects <strong>of</strong> temperature <strong>and</strong> photoperiod on adventitious shoot<br />

production <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix after eight weeks <strong>of</strong> culture .................. 79<br />

Table 4.5: Effects <strong>of</strong> temperature <strong>and</strong> photoperiod on frequency <strong>and</strong> fresh weight<br />

<strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots per explant <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix after eight weeks<br />

<strong>of</strong> culture ............................................................................................ 80<br />

Table 4.6: Effects <strong>of</strong> culture vessel size on adventitious shoot production <strong>of</strong><br />

Huernia hystrix after eight weeks <strong>of</strong> culture........................................ 85<br />

Table 4.7: Effects <strong>of</strong> half-strength MS medium with or without IBA<br />

supplementation on rooting <strong>and</strong> acclimatization <strong>of</strong> regenerated plants<br />

........................................................................................................... 88<br />

Chapter 5<br />

Table 5.1: Yield (% w/w) <strong>of</strong> extracts prepared from different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

species in terms <strong>of</strong> starting crude material ....................................... 103<br />

xvii


Table 5.2: Yield (% w/w) <strong>of</strong> extracts prepared from different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia<br />

hystrix in terms <strong>of</strong> starting crude material ......................................... 104<br />

Table 5.3: Antibacterial activity (MIC <strong>and</strong> MID) <strong>of</strong> crude extracts from different<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species .......................................................... 105<br />

Table 5.4: Antibacterial activity (MIC <strong>and</strong> MBC) <strong>of</strong> crude extracts from different<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix .................................................................... 106<br />

Table 5.5: Antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> crude extracts from different parts <strong>of</strong> three<br />

<strong>Barleria</strong> species against C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans ....................................... 108<br />

Table 5.6: Antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix against C<strong>and</strong>ida<br />

albicans ............................................................................................ 109<br />

Table 5.7: DPPH radical scavenging activity <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

species ............................................................................................. 117<br />

Table 5.8: DPPH radical scavenging activity <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix<br />

......................................................................................................... 118<br />

xviii


LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS<br />

[3G]BA 6-Benzylamino-3-β-D-glucopyranosylpurine<br />

[7G]BA 6-Benzylamino-7-β-D-glucopyranosylpurine<br />

[9G]BA 6-Benzylamino-9-β-D-glucopyranosylpurine<br />

[9R]BA 6-Benzylamino-9-β-D-rib<strong>of</strong>uranosylpurine<br />

2,4-D 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid<br />

AChE Acetylcholinesterase<br />

AD Alzheimer‟s disease<br />

AIDS Acquired immune deficiency syndrome<br />

ANOVA Analysis <strong>of</strong> variance<br />

ATCC American type culture collection<br />

ATCI Acetylthiocholine iodide<br />

ATP Adenosine triphosphate<br />

B5 B5 medium (GAMBORG et al., 1968)<br />

BA 6-Benzyladenine<br />

BHT Butylated hydroxytoluene (2,6-Di-tert.-butyl-p-cresol)<br />

CAM Crassulacean acid metabolism<br />

CNS Central nervous system<br />

COX Cyclooxygenase<br />

DCM Dichloromethane<br />

DHZ Dihydrozeatin<br />

DIF Difference in photoperiod <strong>and</strong> dark period temperatures<br />

DMRT Duncan‟s Multiple Range Test<br />

DPM Disintegrations per minute<br />

DPPH 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl<br />

DTNB 5,5-Dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid<br />

DW Dry weight<br />

ET Electron transfer<br />

EtOH Ethanol<br />

Folin C Folin-Ciocalteu<br />

FRAP Ferric ion reducing power assay<br />

FSA Flora <strong>of</strong> southern Africa<br />

xix


GAE Gallic acid equivalents<br />

GST Glutathione S-transferase<br />

HAT Hydrogen atom transfer<br />

HE Harpagoside equivalents<br />

HPLC High-performance liquid chromatography<br />

IAA Indole-3-acetic acid<br />

IBA Indole-3-butyric acid<br />

iNOS Inducible nitric oxide synthase<br />

INT p-Iodonitrotetrazolium chloride<br />

iP N 6 -Isopentenyladenine<br />

IUCN International Union for the Conservation <strong>of</strong> Nature <strong>and</strong><br />

Natural Resources<br />

LOX 5-Lipoxygenase<br />

LTs Leukotrienes<br />

MBC Minimum bactericidal concentration<br />

MemTR meta-Methoxytopolin riboside<br />

MeOH Methanol<br />

MFC Minimum fungicidal concentration<br />

MFD Minimum fungicidal dilution<br />

MH Mueller-Hinton<br />

MIC Minimum inhibitory concentration<br />

MID Minimum inhibitory dilution<br />

MS MURASHIGE <strong>and</strong> SKOOG (1962)<br />

mT meta-Topolin<br />

mTR meta-Topolin riboside<br />

NAA α-Naphtalene acetic acid<br />

NADPH Reduced adenine dinucleotide phosphate<br />

ND Not determined<br />

NF-кB Nuclear factor-кB<br />

NSAIDs Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs<br />

OG O-glucosides<br />

OH Hydroxyl<br />

ORAC Oxygen radical absorbance capacity<br />

xx


PE Petroleum ether<br />

PEPC Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase<br />

PGR Plant growth regulators<br />

PPF Photosynthetic photon flux<br />

RNA Ribonucleic acid<br />

ROS Reactive oxygen species<br />

RSA Radical scavenging activity<br />

SH Schenk <strong>and</strong> Hilderbr<strong>and</strong>t (1972)<br />

TEAC Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity<br />

TLC Thin-layer-chromatographic<br />

US United States<br />

WWF World Wildlife Fund<br />

YM Yeast Malt<br />

Z trans-Zeatin<br />

xxi


ABSTRACT<br />

The crisis <strong>of</strong> newly emerging diseases <strong>and</strong> the resistance <strong>of</strong> many pathogens to<br />

currently used drugs, coupled with the adverse side-effects <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> these drugs<br />

have necessitated the continuous search for new drugs that are potent <strong>and</strong><br />

efficacious with minimal or no adverse side-effects. The plant kingdom is known to<br />

contain many novel biologically active compounds, many <strong>of</strong> which could potentially<br />

have a higher <strong>medicinal</strong> value when compared to some <strong>of</strong> the current medications.<br />

Indeed, the use <strong>of</strong> plants in traditional medicine, especially in African communities,<br />

is gaining more importance due to their affordability <strong>and</strong> accessibility as well as<br />

their effectiveness. Exponential population growth rates in many developing<br />

countries has resulted in heavy exploitation <strong>of</strong> our plant resources for their<br />

<strong>medicinal</strong> values. In addition, plant habitat destruction arising from human<br />

developmental activities has contributed to the fragmentation or loss <strong>of</strong> many plant<br />

populations. Owing to these factors, many plant species with horticultural <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

<strong>medicinal</strong> potential have become either extinct or are threatened with extinction.<br />

These threatened species cut across different taxonomic categories including<br />

shrubs, trees <strong>and</strong> succulents. Without the application <strong>of</strong> effective conservation<br />

strategies, the <strong>medicinal</strong> <strong>and</strong>/or horticultural potential <strong>of</strong> such threatened species<br />

may be totally lost with time. The extinction <strong>of</strong> such species could lead to the loss<br />

<strong>of</strong> potential therapeutic compounds <strong>and</strong>/or genes capable <strong>of</strong> being exploited in the<br />

biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> new potent pharmaceutical compounds.<br />

The overall aims <strong>of</strong> this study were to establish efficient regeneration protocols<br />

<strong>and</strong> explore the <strong>medicinal</strong> <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> two threatened South African species<br />

belonging to different taxonomic categories: <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong> (a shrub) <strong>and</strong> Huernia<br />

hystrix (a succulent). <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong> is a perennial ornamental <strong>and</strong> a critically<br />

endangered shrub, endemic to a small area in KwaZulu-Natal province <strong>of</strong> South<br />

Africa. Its conventional propagation is hampered by high seed parasitism <strong>and</strong><br />

difficulty in rooting. Huernia hystrix is a dwarf perennial stem succulent heavily<br />

exploited for traditional medicine among the Zulu people in South Africa. It is<br />

considered vulnerable in KwaZulu-Natal province, an endangered endemic to the<br />

flora <strong>of</strong> the southern Africa region <strong>and</strong> is vulnerable in its global conservation<br />

xxii


status. Being a dwarf species, very limited cuttings can be taken from the mother<br />

plant for conventional propagation.<br />

In developing a micropropagation protocol for B. <strong>greenii</strong> using shoot-tip explants (5<br />

mm length), the effects <strong>of</strong> BA with or without NAA combinations, in MS medium<br />

were evaluated. Concentrations <strong>of</strong> 0.0, 0.5, <strong>and</strong> 1.0 µM <strong>of</strong> NAA were combined<br />

with 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 <strong>and</strong> 5.0 µM BA in a 3 × 5 completely r<strong>and</strong>omised factorial<br />

design. The treatments with BA alone gave higher adventitious shoot production<br />

both after four <strong>and</strong> six weeks <strong>of</strong> culture when compared to the BA treatments<br />

supplemented with NAA concentrations. These results imply that the exogenous<br />

application <strong>of</strong> NAA is neither required nor beneficial for adventitious shoot<br />

induction or proliferation from the shoot-tip explants <strong>of</strong> this species. In evaluating<br />

the effects <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>and</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> cytokinins on shoot production,<br />

the treatments with kinetin generally gave a low shoot production whereas BA<br />

treatments gave increased adventitious shoot production with the optimum at a<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> 3 µM. High abnormality indices were however, observed in all the<br />

treatments with BA. At higher concentrations (5 <strong>and</strong> 7 µM), the treatments with<br />

mTR <strong>and</strong> MemTR gave increased adventitious shoot production with abnormality<br />

indices less than that <strong>of</strong> the control. These results indicated that the topolins (mTR<br />

<strong>and</strong> MemTR) are less toxic <strong>and</strong> more effective in the micropropagation <strong>of</strong> this plant<br />

species. The abnormality indices recorded in the topolin treatments could possibly<br />

be carry-over effects <strong>of</strong> BA since the explants used were obtained from BA-treated<br />

cultures. Furthermore, cultures maintained under a 16 h photoperiod gave a<br />

significantly higher production <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots with lengths greater than 10<br />

mm than those placed under continuous light. Regenerated shoots were ex vitro<br />

rooted after an IBA pulse-treatment for five hours <strong>and</strong> acclimatized successfully<br />

with 65% survival. This developed protocol could potentially produce over 60,000<br />

transplantable shoots per year from a single shoot-tip explant.<br />

An efficient <strong>and</strong> rapid micropropagation protocol was successfully developed for H.<br />

hystrix. Adventitious shoots were regenerated from stem explants (10 mm length)<br />

cultured on MS medium supplemented with a range <strong>of</strong> NAA (0.00, 2.69, 5.37 <strong>and</strong><br />

8.06 µM) <strong>and</strong> BA (4.44, 13.32 <strong>and</strong> 22.19 µM BA) concentrations. The treatments<br />

with a combination <strong>of</strong> BA <strong>and</strong> NAA demonstrated a synergistic effect on<br />

xxiii


adventitious shoot production. A 100% shoot regeneration frequency with a<br />

production <strong>of</strong> four adventitious shoots per explant was obtained on MS medium<br />

containing 5.37 µM NAA <strong>and</strong> 22.19 µM BA. Callus produced at the base <strong>of</strong> the<br />

explant on the same medium showed root organogenic potential. The effects <strong>of</strong><br />

photoperiod <strong>and</strong> temperature were further evaluated in optimizing this<br />

micropropagation protocol. Significant increases in shoot proliferation were<br />

observed with increased temperature in cultures maintained under a 16 h<br />

photoperiod. Slow growth observed at low temperatures (15 <strong>and</strong> 20°C) <strong>of</strong>fers a<br />

potential strategy for cost-effective in vitro storage <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix germplasm. The<br />

maximum number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots produced per explant <strong>and</strong> shoot<br />

regeneration frequency were observed in cultures maintained at 35ºC, the<br />

optimum temperature for photosynthesis in plants possessing CAM. The nocturnal<br />

accumulation <strong>of</strong> organic acids in cultures incubated under a 16 h photoperiod<br />

further suggest the presence <strong>of</strong> CAM in this species. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, cultures<br />

kept under continuous light appear to shift to a C-3 photosynthetic pathway. With<br />

an increase in temperature under continuous light, there was a significant<br />

decrease in the fresh weight <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots regenerated per explant. The<br />

use <strong>of</strong> larger culture vessels further increased the shoot proliferation to 5.6 shoots<br />

per explant with a potential production <strong>of</strong> 3429 shoots per m 2 in the growth room<br />

compared to 2750 shoots per m 2 using culture tubes. Regenerated shoots<br />

produced roots when transferred to half strength MS medium with or without auxin.<br />

The micropropagated plants were easily acclimatized within two months under<br />

greenhouse conditions when potted in a soil <strong>and</strong> s<strong>and</strong> mixture (1:1; v/v) treated<br />

with a fungicide (Benlate, 0.01%). More than 95% survival with no observable<br />

morphological variations was obtained. The developed protocol provides a simple,<br />

cost-effective means for the conservation <strong>of</strong> endangered H. hystrix by clonal<br />

propagation within a short time.<br />

The dual biological <strong>and</strong> chemical screening approach was used to evaluate the<br />

<strong>medicinal</strong> <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species (including B. <strong>greenii</strong>) <strong>and</strong> H. hystrix.<br />

Different extracts <strong>of</strong> these species demonstrated antibacterial, antifungal, anti-<br />

inflammatory, antioxidant <strong>and</strong> AChE inhibition activities. The observed<br />

pharmacological activities might be largely due to their relatively high flavonoid<br />

content, with a contributing effect from their iridoid <strong>and</strong> tannin compounds. The<br />

xxiv


activities shown by H. hystrix extracts might possibly explain its heavy exploitation<br />

in traditional medicine. Extracts from <strong>Barleria</strong> species generally had comparatively<br />

higher pharmacological activities <strong>and</strong> phytochemical content. The concept <strong>of</strong><br />

substituting plant parts (such as leaves <strong>and</strong> stems for roots) for sustainable<br />

exploitation was found to be dependent on the species <strong>and</strong>/or biological activity<br />

evaluated. The substantial high activities observed with some B. <strong>greenii</strong> extracts in<br />

the pharmacological assays used further highlight the need to conserve our plant<br />

resources before they become extinct, since some <strong>of</strong> them could be<br />

pharmacologically active <strong>and</strong> perhaps contain novel compounds that are<br />

biologically active against some treatment-resistant infections.<br />

xxv


Chapter 1 General introduction<br />

1.1 Use <strong>of</strong> plants in horticulture <strong>and</strong> traditional medicine<br />

Worldwide, there is an ever-growing dem<strong>and</strong> for valuable plants many <strong>of</strong> which<br />

are used for horticultural <strong>and</strong> <strong>medicinal</strong> purposes. Flowering plant species that can<br />

be easily potted, are frost-hardy, cold or drought tolerant <strong>and</strong> requiring little<br />

maintenance are sought after by collectors due to their high ornamental value.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> these ornamental species are also known to be <strong>medicinal</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>medicinal</strong><br />

plants are important in meeting the human need for good healthcare. A report by<br />

the World Health Organization, for example, shows that about 80% <strong>of</strong> the world‟s<br />

population depends on traditional medicines to meet at least some <strong>of</strong> their primary<br />

healthcare needs (WHO, 2004). The use <strong>of</strong> plants in indigenous or traditional<br />

medicine is more affordable <strong>and</strong> accessible to most <strong>of</strong> the population especially in<br />

African communities, <strong>and</strong> it is generally believed to be effective. FENNELL (2002)<br />

observed that about two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the South African population still use plants for<br />

traditional medicines. The majority <strong>of</strong> plants traditionally used for <strong>medicinal</strong><br />

purposes in South Africa are harvested from the wild <strong>and</strong> are yet to be fully<br />

analyzed for their bioactive compounds (TAYLOR <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, 2001). In<br />

addition, the exponential population growth rates in developing countries since the<br />

latter half <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century has resulted in increased dem<strong>and</strong> for plant<br />

resources (JÄGER <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, 2000). This increasing growth rate has<br />

also resulted in plant habitat destruction to allow for agricultural <strong>and</strong> settlement<br />

l<strong>and</strong> among other developmental activities (JÄGER <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, 2000).<br />

Owing to their over-exploitation, coupled with destructive harvesting methods,<br />

habitat loss, habitat change <strong>and</strong> other human activities, many plant species with<br />

horticultural <strong>and</strong>/or <strong>medicinal</strong> potentials have become either extinct or are<br />

threatened with extinction.<br />

1.2 The need for conservation <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

According to SARASAN et al. (2006), more than eight thous<strong>and</strong> plant species<br />

were added to the International Union for the Conservation <strong>of</strong> Nature <strong>and</strong> Natural<br />

Resources (IUCN) Red List <strong>of</strong> Threatened Species during the period 1996 -2004.<br />

1


During this same period, these authors noted that the number <strong>of</strong> plants recorded<br />

as „critically endangered‟ increased by over 60%. The International Union for<br />

Conservation <strong>of</strong> Nature (IUCN) <strong>and</strong> the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) estimated that<br />

up to 60,000 higher plant species could become extinct or nearly extinct by the<br />

year 2050 if the current trends <strong>of</strong> utilization continue (ETKIN, 1998). Despite<br />

increased governmental regulation, destructive <strong>and</strong> indiscriminate harvesting <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>medicinal</strong> plants continues unabated especially in Africa, where the collection <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>medicinal</strong> plants mainly from the wild has become a form <strong>of</strong> rural self-employment<br />

(AFOLAYAN <strong>and</strong> ADEBOLA, 2004). The rising rate <strong>of</strong> unemployment coupled<br />

with the recent global economic recession might even worsen the current situation.<br />

Although South Africa is very rich in floral biodiversity, many <strong>of</strong> the species are<br />

highly endemic, heavily exploited <strong>and</strong> are thus facing the risk <strong>of</strong> becoming extinct.<br />

Added to this problem is the fact that some <strong>of</strong> the species involved are slow-<br />

growing, not readily cultivated <strong>and</strong> with a high habitat specificity. These threatened<br />

species cut across different taxonomic categories including shrubs, trees <strong>and</strong><br />

succulents.<br />

In the light <strong>of</strong> the current increasing dem<strong>and</strong>s (which far exceeds supply), the<br />

<strong>medicinal</strong> <strong>and</strong>/or horticultural potentials <strong>of</strong> such species may be totally lost if<br />

efforts are not geared towards their conservation. Their extinction would mean,<br />

amongst other things, the loss <strong>of</strong> genes which could be used for plant<br />

improvement or in the biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> new compounds (RATES, 2001). It would<br />

also mean the loss <strong>of</strong> interesting chemical compounds (RATES, 2001) with<br />

pharmaceutical or nutraceutical potential. CUNNINGHAM (1993) observed that<br />

the majority <strong>of</strong> plants used in traditional medicines have not been adequately<br />

screened for active ingredients. He therefore suggested that conservation efforts<br />

be directed at all species vulnerable to being over-exploited. Moreover, the<br />

conservation <strong>of</strong> plant species is crucial to the survival <strong>of</strong> other life-forms since<br />

plants contribute to the integrity <strong>of</strong> our environment (ABOEL-NIL, 1997). For<br />

instance, it has been estimated that a disappearing plant (due to extinction) can<br />

take with it ten to thirty other species such as insects, higher animals, <strong>and</strong> even<br />

plants that depend directly or indirectly on it (WOCHOK, 1981).<br />

2


1.3 Distribution, morphology, uses <strong>and</strong> conservation status <strong>of</strong> the studied<br />

plant species<br />

1.3.1 <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong><br />

The genus <strong>Barleria</strong>, belonging to the Acanthaceae family, is a large genus <strong>of</strong><br />

herbs <strong>and</strong> shrubs comprising about 300 species worldwide (MAKHOLELA et al.,<br />

2003). The richest representation is in Africa where there are two centers <strong>of</strong><br />

diversity, one in tropical east Africa (about 80 species) <strong>and</strong> the other in southern<br />

Africa (about 70 species) (BALKWILL <strong>and</strong> BALKWILL, 1998). Most species in<br />

this genus show a high degree <strong>of</strong> regional endemism. For example, the Indian<br />

subcontinent, West Africa, southern Africa <strong>and</strong> East Africa are reported to have<br />

75, 72, 65 <strong>and</strong> 56% endemism, respectively (BALKWILL <strong>and</strong> BALKWILL, 1998).<br />

<strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong> M.-J. Balkwill & K. Balkwill is one such species endemic to South<br />

Africa. The first population <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> was discovered in 1984 by Dave Green, a<br />

farmer <strong>and</strong> amateur botanist from the Estcourt district <strong>of</strong> Natal (BALKWILL et al.,<br />

1990). It is extremely localized <strong>and</strong> extremely restricted in distribution, occurring in<br />

eight localities on three farms near Estcourt, South Africa (MAKHOLELA et al.,<br />

2003). Plants belonging to this species are found in open, rocky areas on<br />

moderately sloping north-facing aspects, mostly between the 1200 m <strong>and</strong> 1260 m<br />

contours (BALKWILL et al., 1990). The ballistic seed dispersal occurring over<br />

short distances further affects its distribution such that long-range dispersal to new<br />

suitable habitats occurs rather rarely (BALKWILL et al., 1990).<br />

<strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong> is a perennial, pr<strong>of</strong>usely branched woody shrub (Figure 1.1) up to<br />

1.8 m high (BALKWILL et al., 1990). Its growth form is affected by light intensity<br />

<strong>and</strong> the frequency with which its habitat area is burnt (BALKWILL et al., 1990).<br />

BALKWILL et al. (1990), for example, observed that plants growing in the shade<br />

are much less robust <strong>and</strong> have broader leaves than those growing in full sun. They<br />

noted that plants burnt less <strong>of</strong>ten are extremely robust, woody, attaining heights <strong>of</strong><br />

almost 2 m, whereas those burnt <strong>of</strong>ten are less robust, attaining a greater<br />

diameter with more vigorous branching but a height <strong>of</strong> only 0.8 m. <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong><br />

flowers from mid-to late summer, usually over a period <strong>of</strong> a few weeks<br />

(MAKHOLELA et al., 2003). The attractive flowers, ranging from pure white to<br />

3


dark pink with magenta streaks on the corolla lobes, emit a strong, sweet<br />

fragrance at night <strong>and</strong> produce large quantities <strong>of</strong> nectar (MAKHOLELA et al.,<br />

2003). The fruits, which are produced from early to late autumn, are a 4-seeded<br />

capsule, green when young, black when mature (Figure 1.1) <strong>and</strong> dehiscing<br />

explosively (BALKWILL et al., 1990). The seeds are discoid, greyish-black, <strong>and</strong><br />

covered in hygroscopic hairs (BALKWILL et al., 1990).<br />

<strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong> is a beautiful garden plant, flowering prolifically. It grows under a<br />

wide range <strong>of</strong> conditions <strong>and</strong> is frost hardy (TURNER, 2001). SCOTT-SHAW<br />

(1999) described it as a successful <strong>and</strong> popular garden plant with attractive<br />

flowers. Other <strong>Barleria</strong> species grown as ornamentals include B. cristata, B.<br />

repens <strong>and</strong> B. prionitis. Although B. <strong>greenii</strong> has no recorded usage in traditional<br />

medicine, many <strong>Barleria</strong> species have been reportedly used in folk medicine <strong>and</strong><br />

validated to contain compounds possessing biological effects such as anti-<br />

inflammatory, analgesic, antileukemic, antitumor, antihyperglycemic, anti-amoebic,<br />

virucidal <strong>and</strong> antibiotic activities.<br />

Figure 1.1: <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong>. (A) The plant during flowering (B) Calyx bearing<br />

the unopened, mature fruits (capsules).<br />

4


Out <strong>of</strong> eighteen <strong>Barleria</strong> species listed by HILTON-TAYLOR (1996) in the Red<br />

Data List <strong>of</strong> Southern Africa plants, thirteen are endemic to the flora <strong>of</strong> southern<br />

Africa (FSA) region. These include <strong>Barleria</strong> natalensis (extinct in its global<br />

conservation status), B. argillicola <strong>and</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> (global conservation status:<br />

vulnerable), as well as B. dolomiticola <strong>and</strong> B. solitaria (global conservation status:<br />

rare). SCOTT-SHAW (1999) described B. <strong>greenii</strong> as a very rare species with<br />

narrow distribution, low abundance <strong>and</strong> high habitat specificity, <strong>and</strong> endangered in<br />

its conservation status. Currently, B. <strong>greenii</strong> is listed as „critically endangered‟ in<br />

the National Red List <strong>of</strong> South African plants (SANBI, 2009).<br />

1.3.2. Huernia hystrix<br />

Huernia (Family: Asclepiadaceae) is a genus <strong>of</strong> about sixty-four species found in<br />

eastern <strong>and</strong> southern Africa, Ethiopia <strong>and</strong> Arabia (HODGKISS, 2004). HILTON-<br />

TAYLOR (1996) listed sixteen Huernia species including H. hystrix as endemic to<br />

the FSA region. Huernia hystrix has three varieties, which are hystrix, nova, <strong>and</strong><br />

parvula. This succulent species is reported to be very rare, <strong>of</strong> narrow distribution<br />

<strong>and</strong> low abundance, especially the parvula variety (SCOTT-SHAW, 1999).<br />

The plants are dwarf, perennial stem succulents which are normally mat forming or<br />

creeping, rarely pendulous (LIEDE-SCHUMANN <strong>and</strong> MEVE, 2006). The grey-<br />

green, five-ridged, prickled stems <strong>of</strong>ten branch from the base (Figure 1.2) forming<br />

large clusters. Their attractive flowers with short stalks have a five-angled margin<br />

or are five-lobed with a characteristic small lobe in the angle between the main<br />

lobes (HODGKISS, 2004). The plants are free-flowering in late summer; the<br />

flowers being quite frilly <strong>and</strong> particularly attractive (HODGKISS, 2004).<br />

Huernia hystrix is in the category <strong>of</strong> Cactus <strong>and</strong> succulent plants. Being drought-<br />

tolerant, it is suitable for xeriscaping <strong>and</strong> can easily be grown in small containers.<br />

AL-TURKI (2002) described it as an excellent ornamental for rock gardens.<br />

Huernia species (likely H. hystrix) are reportedly consumed as typical famine-food<br />

plants in southern Ethiopia (GUINAND <strong>and</strong> LEMESSA, 2000). According to<br />

SCOTT-SHAW (1999), the whole plant <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix is heavily exploited for<br />

5


traditional medicine (muthi) among the Zulu people in South Africa, though an<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> its <strong>medicinal</strong> usage has to be done. It is traded in traditional<br />

medicine system <strong>and</strong> commonly known as toad plant or ililo elinsundu (Zulu). The<br />

infusions <strong>of</strong> the plant are reportedly used as protective charms (HUTCHINGS et<br />

al., 1996). In Swazil<strong>and</strong>, the stem <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix is said to be used for sexual<br />

stimulation (LONG, 2005). Other Huernia species reported to be <strong>medicinal</strong> include<br />

H. stapelioides <strong>and</strong> H. zebrina, though their <strong>medicinal</strong> usages were not specified<br />

(LONG, 2005).<br />

Of the sixteen endemic Huernia species in the Red Data List <strong>of</strong> southern African<br />

plants, two are extinct, one endangered, two vulnerable, <strong>and</strong> five rare (HILTON-<br />

TAYLOR, 1996). Huernia hystrix is considered vulnerable in KwaZulu-Natal,<br />

endangered endemic to FSA region <strong>and</strong> vulnerable in its global conservation<br />

status (HILTON-TAYLOR, 1996; SCOTT-SHAW, 1999). It is threatened by its<br />

heavy exploitation for traditional medicine. Its collection or harvesting is destructive<br />

since the whole plant is <strong>of</strong>ten used. Furthermore, the plants are susceptible to<br />

stem <strong>and</strong> root mealy bugs, <strong>and</strong> damage from these may well facilitate fungal<br />

attack (HODGKISS, 2004).<br />

Figure 1.2: Flowering Huernia hystrix potted in a small container. Bar = 10 mm<br />

6


1.4 Value <strong>of</strong> tissue culture<br />

The application <strong>of</strong> tissue culture as a biotechnological tool in the conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

threatened economic plants has gained tremendous impetus in the last two<br />

decades. The tissue culture technique is a powerful tool for plant germplasm<br />

conservation <strong>and</strong> can be a viable alternative to conventional propagation <strong>of</strong> slow<br />

growing species or species that produce recalcitrant or few viable seeds (ABOEL-<br />

NIL, 1997). Rapid <strong>and</strong> mass propagation <strong>of</strong> plant species <strong>and</strong> their long-term<br />

germplasm storage are achievable in a small space <strong>and</strong> short time, with no<br />

damage to the existing population. Plant material can be produced throughout the<br />

year without any seasonal limitation. Due to the aseptic nature <strong>of</strong> tissue culture<br />

technique, large numbers <strong>of</strong> uniform <strong>and</strong> disease-free plants can be produced<br />

from very small portions <strong>of</strong> the mother plant. The sterile nature <strong>of</strong> in vitro cultures<br />

facilitates the exchange <strong>of</strong> germplasm or plant materials even at international level<br />

(SALIH et al., 2001).<br />

Furthermore, plant tissue culture systems <strong>of</strong>ten serve as model systems in the<br />

study <strong>of</strong> physiological, biochemical, genetic <strong>and</strong> structural problems related to<br />

plants (TORRES, 1989). The use <strong>of</strong> in vitro culture technique has found<br />

applications in genetic breeding <strong>and</strong> improvement, production <strong>of</strong> new hybrids <strong>and</strong><br />

overcoming incompatibility during crosses. Somaclonal variation, <strong>of</strong>ten referred to<br />

as „<strong>of</strong>f-types‟ is sometimes considered to be an unwanted side-effect <strong>of</strong> in vitro<br />

culture technique. However, depending on the research objective, this could be<br />

advantageous in increasing the pool <strong>of</strong> variability. The variability can result in<br />

superior plants or plants with adaptive advantage that can be selected <strong>and</strong> further<br />

exploited in genetic improvement programs. Moreover, the control <strong>of</strong> chemical <strong>and</strong><br />

physical conditions <strong>of</strong> in vitro cultures makes it possible to optimize conditions<br />

needed for enhanced production <strong>of</strong> secondary metabolites in target cells or tissues<br />

(ABOEL-NIL, 1997). In vitro production <strong>of</strong> secondary metabolites, in turn, <strong>of</strong>fers a<br />

steady <strong>and</strong> reliable source <strong>of</strong> supply for pharmaceutical or nutraceutical industries<br />

(GIULIETTI <strong>and</strong> ERTOLA, 1999).<br />

7


1.5 Aims <strong>and</strong> objectives<br />

Endemic <strong>and</strong> threatened South African species fall in different taxonomic<br />

categories including succulents, shrubs <strong>and</strong> trees. The overall aims <strong>of</strong> this study<br />

were to establish efficient regeneration protocols <strong>and</strong> explore the <strong>medicinal</strong><br />

<strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> two threatened South African species belonging to different<br />

taxonomic categories: <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong> (a shrub) <strong>and</strong> Huernia hystrix (a succulent).<br />

The specific objectives were to:<br />

Determine the appropriate chemical (nutritional) <strong>and</strong> environmental<br />

conditions for in vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the two species;<br />

Investigate the acetylcholinesterase inhibition, antimicrobial, anti-<br />

inflammatory <strong>and</strong> anti-oxidant activities <strong>of</strong> different extracts <strong>of</strong> these<br />

species;<br />

Investigate the possibility <strong>of</strong> plant-part substitution as a conservation<br />

strategy against destructive harvesting <strong>of</strong> these species for <strong>medicinal</strong><br />

purpose;<br />

Explore the phytochemical <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> these species.<br />

1.6 General overview <strong>of</strong> the thesis<br />

Chapter 2 provides background information from literature, relating to<br />

micropropagation techniques <strong>and</strong> major factors affecting the success <strong>of</strong> the<br />

technique. It also provides an insight into the fundamental principles underlying the<br />

pharmacological activities evaluated in this study.<br />

Chapter 3 gives an insight into the development <strong>of</strong> the micropropagation protocol<br />

established for B. <strong>greenii</strong>. The results suggest that exogenous application <strong>of</strong> NAA<br />

is neither required nor beneficial for in vitro shoot induction or multiplication from<br />

shoot-tip explants <strong>of</strong> this species. The effects <strong>of</strong> types <strong>and</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />

aromatic cytokinins as well as the effects <strong>of</strong> different light periods were<br />

investigated <strong>and</strong> will be discussed.<br />

8


Chapter 4 describes the simple, rapid <strong>and</strong> cost-effective clonal propagation<br />

protocol developed for H. hystrix. The findings indicate that both BA (cytokinin)<br />

<strong>and</strong> NAA (auxin) have a synergistic effect on shoot multiplication from stem<br />

explants <strong>of</strong> this species. The chapter further highlights the need to investigate the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> environmental conditions when developing efficient micropropagation<br />

protocols, especially for commercial purposes. Optimizing environmental<br />

conditions could increase growth rate, reduce labour costs <strong>and</strong> thus subsequent<br />

production costs.<br />

Chapter 5 presents the pharmacological <strong>and</strong> phytochemical <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> extracts<br />

from different parts <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> <strong>and</strong> H. hystrix. For comparison purpose, extracts<br />

from two other <strong>Barleria</strong> species (B. albostellata <strong>and</strong> B. prionitis) were included.<br />

The results indicate the <strong>medicinal</strong> potential <strong>of</strong> the studied plants. Different extracts<br />

<strong>of</strong> different plant parts show different potencies in the activities evaluated. The<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> plant part substitution as a conservation measure is discussed.<br />

Chapter 6 summarizes the major conclusions drawn from this study.<br />

The section „References‟ provides an alphabetical list <strong>of</strong> publications or materials<br />

cited in this thesis.<br />

9


2.1 <strong>Micropropagation</strong><br />

2.1.1 Introduction<br />

Chapter 2 Literature review<br />

The term „micropropagation‟ also known as „in vitro propagation‟ generally involves<br />

aseptic culturing <strong>of</strong> excised small plant parts (explants) in an artificial medium<br />

under appropriate physical conditions for the purpose <strong>of</strong> producing clonal plants<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> surviving in a natural environment. Although it is not different in<br />

principle from the conventional propagation <strong>of</strong> some species by cuttings, the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> smaller propagules, provision <strong>of</strong> aseptic <strong>and</strong> controlled environmental<br />

conditions, heterotrophic development, <strong>and</strong> faster plant multiplication makes the<br />

micropropagation technique more effective (MURASHIGE, 1978). The process <strong>of</strong><br />

micropropagation is <strong>of</strong>ten accomplished in different but sequential stages.<br />

MURASHIGE (1978) proposed four widely accepted stages (I – IV) while<br />

DEBERGH <strong>and</strong> MAENE (1981) suggested an additional stage 0. These stages<br />

are <strong>of</strong>ten used worldwide in research <strong>and</strong> commercial laboratories for plant<br />

propagation through tissue culture. The objectives <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the stages <strong>and</strong> what<br />

they involve are discussed in the following sections.<br />

2.1.2 Stage 0: Selection <strong>and</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> mother plants<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this first stage in micropropagation is to select mother (stock)<br />

plants that could provide healthy explants capable <strong>of</strong> being uniformly initiated into<br />

culture (DEBERGH <strong>and</strong> MAENE, 1981). Plants that are healthy, apparently free<br />

from any disease symptom <strong>and</strong> vigorously growing are <strong>of</strong>ten selected as stock<br />

plants (CONSTABEL <strong>and</strong> SHYLUK, 1994). In some cases, however, selected<br />

stock plants are preconditioned by growing them in the greenhouse at a relatively<br />

low humidity <strong>and</strong> avoiding overhead watering (DEBERGH <strong>and</strong> MAENE, 1981). In<br />

addition, subjecting the stock plants sometimes to antibiotic, fungicidal <strong>and</strong><br />

antiviral treatments could help reduce the contamination level <strong>of</strong> explants taken<br />

subsequently from them (MURASHIGE, 1978). In any case, the careful selection<br />

10


<strong>and</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> stock plants would not only allow for the availability <strong>of</strong><br />

st<strong>and</strong>ardized <strong>and</strong> healthy explants, but also increase the rate <strong>of</strong> explant survival<br />

during culture initiation (DEBERGH <strong>and</strong> MAENE, 1981).<br />

2.1.3 Stage I: Initiation <strong>and</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> aseptic culture<br />

Owing to the inherent totipotentiality <strong>of</strong> plant cells (MURASHIGE, 1978), explants<br />

obtained from different plant tissues have a potential to regenerate plantlets when<br />

given appropriate environmental <strong>and</strong> nutrient conditions. It is important that the<br />

explants be able to grow well in an aseptic in vitro environment free from any<br />

obvious infection (MURASHIGE, 1974). In order to achieve this objective, the<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> explants <strong>and</strong> their decontamination are given serious attention during<br />

this stage.<br />

MURASHIGE (1974) listed five important factors to be considered when choosing<br />

suitable explants. These include (i) the organ serving as explant source; (ii) the<br />

physiological or ontogenic age <strong>of</strong> the organ; (iii) the season in which the explant is<br />

obtained; (iv) the size <strong>of</strong> the explant; <strong>and</strong> (v) the overall quality <strong>of</strong> the stock plant.<br />

Nearly all plant organs or tissues can serve as a source <strong>of</strong> explants in<br />

micropropagation. However, explants taken from different plant parts <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

manifest different regeneration <strong>and</strong> morphogenic responses. KOMALAVALLI <strong>and</strong><br />

RAO (2000), for example, reported different propagation rates <strong>and</strong> morphogenic<br />

responses in axillary node, shoot-tip, cotyledonary node, leaf, petiole, root <strong>and</strong><br />

internode explants <strong>of</strong> Gymnema sylvestre. They observed that only axillary node,<br />

cotyledonary node <strong>and</strong> shoot-tip explants readily regenerated multiple shoots<br />

while other explants produced only callus. These observations were attributed to<br />

the variation in endogenous levels <strong>of</strong> plant growth regulators in the explants at the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> excision. Similar results have been reported by other researchers in<br />

different plant species (NHUT et al., 2004; ISLAM et al., 2005; CONDE et al.,<br />

2008).<br />

The regenerative <strong>and</strong> morphogenic capacities <strong>of</strong> explants are sometimes affected<br />

by the physiological age <strong>of</strong> the explant <strong>and</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> differentiation among<br />

11


their constituent cells (MURASHIGE, 1974). SUDHA et al. (1998), while<br />

investigating the regeneration potential <strong>of</strong> shoot-tip, terminal <strong>and</strong> basal node<br />

explants in Holostemma annulare, observed more rapid multiple shoot formation<br />

from basal node explants. They concluded that this variation in regenerative<br />

response might be due to the differences in endogenous growth regulator level,<br />

nutrient availability <strong>and</strong> physiological status <strong>of</strong> the explants. In general, explants<br />

obtained from juvenile plants <strong>of</strong>ten have a better regenerative capacity compared<br />

to those from older plants, especially in trees <strong>and</strong> shrubs (NHUT et al., 2007),<br />

perhaps due to their meristematic cell types <strong>and</strong> other endogenous factors<br />

(FENNELL, 2002). BECERRA et al. (2004) reported an inverse linear<br />

regeneration capacity in relation to the age <strong>of</strong> donor plants in Passiflora edulis.<br />

They noted that leaf explants taken from juvenile plants (1- to 6-month-old)<br />

showed a statistically significant higher shoot regeneration compared to explants<br />

taken from reinvigorated adult plants (shoots emerging next to the base after<br />

severe pruning <strong>of</strong> 1-year-old adult plants). Even among the juvenile explant<br />

sources, the same inverse linear regeneration capacity with age was observed. In<br />

Gerbera jamesonii, flower bud age was reported to significantly affect the survival<br />

rate <strong>and</strong> shoot regeneration capacity <strong>of</strong> the receptacle transverse thin cell layers,<br />

with the optimum observed in 10-day-old flower buds (NHUT et al., 2007). The<br />

authors further observed that the position <strong>of</strong> receptacle transverse thin cell layers<br />

significantly affected the receptacle morphogenic ability. They noted that shoot<br />

production <strong>and</strong> regeneration frequency decreased from the middle to exterior<br />

receptacle layers, possibly due to more nutrient reserves in the middle layers.<br />

The regenerative capacity <strong>of</strong> explants in tissue culture could also be affected by<br />

the season in which the explant is obtained due to seasonal influences on the<br />

plant developmental stages. PRAKASH <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN (2008) observed that<br />

<strong>of</strong>fshoots <strong>of</strong> Searsia dentata collected during the vegetative stage (April - May)<br />

exhibited a better morphogenic response compared to those collected during the<br />

flowering stage (October – November). Similarly, young <strong>of</strong>fshoots <strong>of</strong> Hoslundia<br />

opposita collected during the months <strong>of</strong> March <strong>and</strong> April were reported to elicit a<br />

better morphogenic response compared to those collected during other months <strong>of</strong><br />

the year (PRAKASH <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, 2007). Other researchers have reported<br />

12


similar differential seasonal responses in explants <strong>of</strong> different plant species (LITZ<br />

<strong>and</strong> CANOVER, 1981; RAZDAN, 2003).<br />

The size <strong>of</strong> explants has been reported to influence their survival <strong>and</strong> growth rates<br />

in vitro. Very small shoot-tip explants such as meristem tips are said to have a low<br />

survival <strong>and</strong> initial growth rates (RAZDAN, 2003) <strong>and</strong> are therefore not practical<br />

for achieving rapid clonal multiplication (MURASHIGE, 1974). Nevertheless, these<br />

authors noted that very small explants (such as submillimetre shoot-tips) are very<br />

useful in obtaining virus-free plants from an infected individual. STROSSE et al.<br />

(2008) observed that 5 mm sized explants <strong>of</strong> banana produced two to three times<br />

more shoots in 3-month-old cultures than 1 mm sized shoot-tips. On the other<br />

h<strong>and</strong>, OTHMANI et al. (2009) reported a decrease in embryogenic callus<br />

frequency in date palm with an increase in explant size. They observed that leaf<br />

explants (5 – 10 mm) had the highest embryogenic callus frequency while in larger<br />

explants (15 – 20 mm), the peripheral parts either turned brown or produced<br />

hyperhydric non-embryogenic callus. A similar observation was reported in<br />

Triticum turgidum with small explants showing a higher morphogenic capacity<br />

(BENKIRANE et al., 2000). According to the authors, larger explants have more<br />

normal tissue interactions than the smaller ones <strong>and</strong> such interactions have a<br />

tendency to inhibit cell division.<br />

As regards the overall quality <strong>of</strong> the donor plants, explants obtained from healthy<br />

plants are generally known to respond better than those from diseased plants<br />

(MURASHIGE, 1974). LIU <strong>and</strong> PIJUT (2008) observed that only selected leaf<br />

explants from Prunus serotina shoots in an active state <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>and</strong> with no sign<br />

<strong>of</strong> chlorosis regenerated adventitious shoots with a high frequency. MURASHIGE<br />

(1974) noted that an explant taken soon after heavy fertilization <strong>of</strong> its source plant<br />

may produce a different response in the same culture medium compared with<br />

explants taken later from the same plant or from an unfertilized plant. Such<br />

differential responses could be largely due to the differences in the physiological<br />

status <strong>of</strong> the parent plants.<br />

In addition to making a good choice <strong>of</strong> explants, the decontamination treatments<br />

given to the explants are crucial for their successful initiation into culture. Since the<br />

13


media are sterile, the explants mainly need to be free <strong>of</strong> contaminants in order to<br />

establish an aseptic culture. Culture contamination <strong>of</strong>ten results in explant death<br />

as contaminants rapidly outgrow the cultured explants, exploit the nutrient-rich<br />

medium, starve the explants, or even produce phytotoxic substances. Surface-<br />

decontamination <strong>of</strong> explants is <strong>of</strong>ten done by soaking the explants in „sterilants‟<br />

such as sodium hypochlorite, calcium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, silver<br />

nitrate <strong>and</strong> mercuric chloride solutions for some seconds or minutes, followed by<br />

thorough rinsing with sterile distilled water under aseptic conditions (TORRES,<br />

1989). MURASHIGE (1978) highlighted other measures that could enhance the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the disinfectant. These include the addition <strong>of</strong> small quantities <strong>of</strong><br />

detergent (such as Tween 20 which acts as a surfactant), performing the<br />

disinfestations under gentle vacuum or with constant <strong>and</strong> relatively vigorous<br />

agitation <strong>and</strong> prewashing the plant material with alcohol or detergent. In a situation<br />

where the explant is internally infested by bacteria, fungi or viruses, the inclusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> antibiotics, fungicides or anti-viral agents respectively in the preliminary culture<br />

media has been suggested (MURASHIGE, 1978; PEIXOTO et al., 2006).<br />

Another problem usually experienced during culture initiation <strong>of</strong> some explants is<br />

explant browning, which <strong>of</strong>ten results in necrosis or tissue death. Browning <strong>of</strong><br />

explants is most severe in high-tannin or other hydroxyphenol containing species<br />

(TORRES, 1989). The browning is attributed to the action <strong>of</strong> copper-containing<br />

oxidase enzymes (such as polyphenol oxidase <strong>and</strong> tyrosinase), which are<br />

produced <strong>and</strong>/or released due to wounding during the excision <strong>of</strong> the tissue<br />

(TORRES, 1989). The incorporation <strong>of</strong> antioxidants (such as ascorbic or citric<br />

acid), <strong>and</strong>/or absorbents (such as activated charcoal or polyvinylpyrrolidone) into<br />

the culture medium as well as regular subculturing to a fresh medium, culturing in<br />

the dark, or excising the explant tissues under sterile distilled water are various<br />

suggested measures to minimize or prevent this problem (RAZDAN, 2003).<br />

Although the use <strong>of</strong> activated charcoal is said to be inhibitory in some cultures due<br />

to its absorption <strong>of</strong> plant growth regulators, its stimulatory effect has nevertheless<br />

been reported in some other cultures (TORRES, 1989; RAZDAN, 2003).<br />

14


2.1.4 Stage II: Proliferation or multiplication <strong>of</strong> propagules<br />

This stage aims at optimizing the production <strong>of</strong> propagules which can potentially<br />

give rise to whole plants. Multiplication can be brought about by axillary shoot<br />

production, adventitious shoot proliferation as well as asexual or somatic<br />

embryogenesis. The latter two regeneration methods can occur either directly from<br />

the cultured explants or indirectly via callus production. Although a particular<br />

predetermined regeneration pathway may be inherent within a specific tissue, the<br />

type <strong>and</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong> exogenous plant growth regulators as well as the culture<br />

environmental conditions <strong>of</strong>ten affect <strong>and</strong> can modify the expression <strong>of</strong> a<br />

regeneration method. In deciding the most appropriate multiplication method,<br />

however, factors such as the rate <strong>and</strong> frequency <strong>of</strong> multiplication as well as the<br />

probability <strong>of</strong> producing aberrant plants should be seriously considered<br />

(MURASHIGE, 1978).<br />

During axillary shoot proliferation, axillary <strong>and</strong> terminal buds (quiescent or active)<br />

from the nodal or shoot-tip segments cultured on appropriate media grow into<br />

axillary shoots. The newly produced shoots with buds along their axis can, in turn<br />

be used to regenerate more shoots until a satisfactory number is achieved.<br />

Although the axillary shoot proliferation method is considerably slower than other<br />

multiplication methods, it allows a yearly multiplication rate that is much faster than<br />

conventional propagation by cuttings (MURASHIGE, 1978). In addition, it has<br />

great potential for shoot multiplication in woody plant species that could not be<br />

successfully regenerated through adventitious shoot proliferation <strong>and</strong> somatic<br />

embryogenesis (TORRES, 1989). Regeneration through axillary shoot production<br />

has been reported in many plant species such as Opuntia spp. (GARCÍA-<br />

SAUCEDO et al., 2005), Cedrela fissilis (NUNES et al., 2002) <strong>and</strong> Chimonanthus<br />

praecox (KOZOMARA et al., 2008), which are succulents, a tree <strong>and</strong> a shrub,<br />

respectively.<br />

Adventitious shoots can be regenerated from nearly all plant tissues or organs<br />

either directly or indirectly (via callus production). They <strong>of</strong>ten develop from sites<br />

where meristems do not exist (RAZDAN, 2003). Whereas this regeneration<br />

method is more rapid, the rate <strong>of</strong> producing genetically or epigenetically altered<br />

15


plants is higher (MURASHIGE, 1978) especially when the regeneration is indirect<br />

through callus production. Minimizing the number <strong>of</strong> subcultures, especially on<br />

media containing plant growth regulators, is therefore encouraged since both the<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> morphogenic capacity <strong>and</strong> abnormality or variation frequency increase<br />

progressively with each subculture (MURASHIGE, 1978; TORRES, 1989; BAIRU<br />

et al., 2008). Nevertheless, the maintenance <strong>of</strong> regenerative ability, for example,<br />

<strong>of</strong> a 5-year-old callus subcultured at 6-weekly intervals has been reported (SATO<br />

et al., 1995). Some researchers have recorded simultaneous shoot multiplication<br />

through axillary <strong>and</strong> adventitious pathways in some cultures (PIERIK, 1987; DE<br />

FÁTIMA et al., 1996; NUNES et al., 2002; DÁVILA-FIGUEROA et al., 2005;<br />

PRAKASH <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, 2008).<br />

Somatic embryogenesis involves the production <strong>of</strong> embryos from vegetative or<br />

somatic cells. These embryos could, in turn develop into whole plants. Direct<br />

somatic embryogenesis occurs when an embryo develops directly from a cell or<br />

tissue without the callus phase. The cells giving rise to the embryos, in this case,<br />

are said to be pre-embryonic determined (PIERIK, 1987). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, an<br />

unorganized mass <strong>of</strong> relatively undifferentiated cells (callus) with proembryogenic<br />

masses may be formed from an explant (SRIVASTAVA, 2002). When subcultured<br />

on media without auxin, these proembryogenic masses could develop through<br />

different embryo stages into whole plants. Somatic embryogenesis is said to have<br />

the greatest potential for achieving rapid clonal micropropagation (TORRES,<br />

1989). It has major application in genetic transformation <strong>and</strong> biolistic gene transfer<br />

(OTHMANI, et al., 2009). In addition, the formation <strong>of</strong> synthetic seeds through<br />

somatic embryogenesis could facilitate the development <strong>of</strong> compact storage,<br />

packaging <strong>and</strong> distribution methods for superior varieties (PAREEK <strong>and</strong><br />

KOTHARI, 2003). However, somatic embryogenesis is not <strong>of</strong>ten used in practice<br />

as a means <strong>of</strong> propagation due to some problems as listed by PIERIK (1987) <strong>and</strong><br />

OTHMANI et al. (2009). These problems include the recalcitrance <strong>of</strong> some<br />

species to this method, the high probability <strong>of</strong> developing mutations, abnormal<br />

development, low maturation <strong>and</strong> germination frequencies <strong>of</strong> somatic embryos,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the increasing probability <strong>of</strong> losing regenerative capacity with repeated<br />

subculture. Nevertheless, many researchers have reported successful<br />

regeneration through direct or indirect somatic embryogenesis from explants <strong>of</strong><br />

16


different plant species (GILL et al., 1995; GOGATE <strong>and</strong> NADGAUDA, 2003;<br />

PAREEK <strong>and</strong> KOTHARI, 2003; GOMES et al., 2006; RAI et al., 2007; AZAD et<br />

al., 2009; OTHMANI et al., 2009).<br />

2.1.5 Stage III: Preparation <strong>of</strong> propagules for transfer to soil<br />

Regenerated shoots or plantlets produced during the immediate previous stage<br />

(stage II) are <strong>of</strong>ten too small or <strong>of</strong> low vigour to be able to survive in soil. The<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> this third micropropagation stage is therefore to prepare regenerated<br />

shoots or plantlets for successful transfer to soil (MURASHIGE, 1978). This stage<br />

involves the in vitro rooting <strong>of</strong> individual regenerated shoots, hardening <strong>of</strong> plants to<br />

impart some disease resistance <strong>and</strong> tolerance to moisture stress, as well as<br />

rendering the plants capable <strong>of</strong> autotrophic development (MURASHIGE, 1978).<br />

Although in vitro rooting is generally an expensive, labour-consuming process,<br />

especially from a commercial perspective, it may be the only practical method <strong>of</strong><br />

rooting plantlets in some species (TORRES, 1989). DE KLERK (2002) reported<br />

that in vitro rooting <strong>of</strong> apple microcuttings strongly increased plantlet size during<br />

the rooting treatment, enhanced acclimatization by improved water uptake during<br />

early acclimatization <strong>and</strong> facilitated the addition <strong>of</strong> extra nutrients <strong>and</strong> protective<br />

compounds that may strongly improve performance. In vitro rooting is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

achieved by culturing shoot cuttings on medium with half-strength concentrations<br />

<strong>of</strong> macro- <strong>and</strong> micronutrients, with or without auxins (TORRES, 1989;<br />

MONCOUSIN, 1991). This however, is <strong>of</strong>ten dependent on the plant species. SUN<br />

et al., (2008), for example, observed a significantly higher rooting frequency in<br />

Zygophyllum xanthoxylon shoots cultured on full-strength MS medium compared<br />

to those cultured on half-strength medium. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, PATIL (1998)<br />

reported an inverse relationship between media strength <strong>and</strong> rooting frequency in<br />

three different species <strong>of</strong> Ceropegia. Indeed, many other researchers have<br />

reported better in vitro rooting on low-strength media compared to full-strength<br />

(SAXENA <strong>and</strong> BHOJWANI, 1993; PUROHIT et al., 1994; ANDRADE et al.,<br />

1999; BEENA et al., 2003). The beneficial effect <strong>of</strong> low medium strength on<br />

rooting has been reported to be possibly due to a reduced requirement <strong>of</strong> nitrogen<br />

by the plantlets for root formation (HYNDMAN et al., 1982). In some plant species,<br />

17


adventitious roots are produced without the application <strong>of</strong> exogenous auxin. This<br />

response is reportedly triggered by the endogenous auxin produced in the shoot<br />

apex <strong>and</strong> transported basipetally to the cut surface (DE KLERK et al., 1999).<br />

NORDSTRÖM <strong>and</strong> ELIASSON (1991) observed that the removal <strong>of</strong> the apex in<br />

pea cuttings resulted in a reduction <strong>of</strong> both the endogenous auxin level in the<br />

basal part <strong>of</strong> the cutting as well as the number <strong>of</strong> roots produced.<br />

In situations where auxins are exogenously applied for rooting purposes, the<br />

auxins frequently added to the media include IAA (0.1 – 10.0 mg l -1 ), IBA (0.5 – 3.0<br />

mg l -1 ) <strong>and</strong> NAA (0.05 – 1.0 mg l -1 ) (TORRES, 1989). BEENA et al. (2003)<br />

observed that IBA was the best for inducing roots in Ceropegia c<strong>and</strong>elabrum,<br />

followed by IAA whereas treatments with NAA showed callus formation <strong>and</strong> poor<br />

root induction. Similarly, CHOFFE et al. (2000) reported that IAA was less<br />

effective than IBA for induction <strong>of</strong> root organogenesis from Echinacea purpurea<br />

hypocotyl explants, while treatments with NAA were ineffective. The superiority <strong>of</strong><br />

IAA <strong>and</strong> IBA over NAA was also reported in Metrosideros excelsa (IAPICHINO<br />

<strong>and</strong> AIRÒ, 2008). According to FOGAÇA <strong>and</strong> FETT-NETO (2005), the efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />

IBA in inducing adventitious rooting in Eucalyptus globulus <strong>and</strong> E. saligna might be<br />

due to its capacity to be converted to IAA (EPSTEIN <strong>and</strong> LAVEE, 1984), thus<br />

serving as a slow release reservoir <strong>of</strong> a more easily metabolized auxin.<br />

Conversely, these authors attributed the negative response <strong>of</strong> NAA to its longer<br />

persistence or stability in plant tissues, resulting in inhibition <strong>of</strong> root growth. DE<br />

KLERK et al. (1997) suggested that NAA might be the preferable auxin<br />

(particularly when applied as a short term initial treatment) for rooting plants with a<br />

high activity <strong>of</strong> auxin-oxidase, due to the non-destruction <strong>of</strong> NAA by auxin-oxidase.<br />

High auxin concentrations are generally known to stimulate root induction but<br />

inhibit root initiation or emergence (DE KLERK et al., 1997, 1999). Ultimately, the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> auxins in rooting processes depends on the affinity <strong>of</strong> the auxin<br />

receptor involved in rooting <strong>and</strong> the concentration <strong>of</strong> free auxin that is reached in<br />

the target cells (DE KLERK et al., 1999). The authors stated further that the<br />

concentration reached in the target cells depends on the amount <strong>of</strong> endogenous<br />

auxin as well as the uptake, transport <strong>and</strong> metabolism <strong>of</strong> the exogenously applied<br />

auxin.<br />

18


Other medium additives such as phloroglucinol <strong>and</strong> activated charcoal could be<br />

beneficial in the rooting <strong>of</strong> some species. BOPANA <strong>and</strong> SAXENA (2008), for<br />

instance, observed that the inclusion <strong>of</strong> phloroglucinol was critical in the rooting <strong>of</strong><br />

Asparagus racemosus, as it enhanced the rooting frequency considerably.<br />

According to these authors, phloroglucinol acts as an auxin synergist during the<br />

auxin sensitive phase <strong>of</strong> root induction. The root-promoting effects <strong>of</strong> activated<br />

charcoal have been extensively reviewed by PAN <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN (1998).<br />

In addition to reducing nutrient level, hardening <strong>and</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> plants for<br />

autotrophic development can be accomplished by the use <strong>of</strong> growth retardants, by<br />

reducing relative humidity as well as increasing the photosynthetic photon flux <strong>and</strong><br />

the carbon dioxide concentration in cultures (MURASHIGE 1978; DEBERGH,<br />

1991; HAZARIKA, 2003). Measures for reducing relative humidity as listed by<br />

HAZARIKA (2003) in his review include the use <strong>of</strong> desiccants, opening the<br />

culture containers, adjusting culture closures or using special closures that<br />

facilitate water loss.<br />

2.1.6 Stage IV: In vivo rooting <strong>and</strong> acclimatization for soil establishment<br />

DEBERGH <strong>and</strong> MAENE (1981) listed four problems associated with in vitro<br />

rooting <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots:<br />

(i) The process <strong>of</strong> rooting regenerated shoots in vitro is the most labour-<br />

intensive stage in micropropagation, <strong>and</strong> has been estimated to be<br />

responsible for approximately 35 to 75% <strong>of</strong> the total cost <strong>of</strong><br />

micropropagation in different species;<br />

(ii) The root system produced in vitro is usually non-functional in a normal<br />

substrate <strong>and</strong> thus require formation <strong>of</strong> new roots after in vivo planting. The<br />

production <strong>of</strong> such new roots is accompanied by a cessation <strong>of</strong> growth;<br />

(iii) Optimal root formation requires an auxin concentration for the induction<br />

phase. This auxin concentration could, when present beyond the induction<br />

phase, inhibit subsequent root elongation; <strong>and</strong><br />

(iv) Damage to the root system during the transplanting process to the soil<br />

creates openings for the entrance <strong>of</strong> micro-organisms, resulting in root<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or stem diseases.<br />

19


DEBERGH <strong>and</strong> MAENE (1981) therefore proposed in vivo rooting <strong>of</strong> tissue<br />

cultured shoots as a viable alternative. In vivo rooting is <strong>of</strong>ten accomplished either<br />

by pulse-treating the shoots for some hours, days or weeks with an auxin<br />

concentration followed by direct planting on normal substrate, dipping the shoots<br />

in an auxin powder or planting the shoots directly in a rooting mixture previously<br />

saturated with an auxin solution (DEBERGH <strong>and</strong> MAENE, 1981; DEBERGH,<br />

1991). Rooting mixtures include such materials as peat, vermiculite, perlite, bark,<br />

pumice, rockwool, s<strong>and</strong>, soil, or their mixtures, with or without supplementation<br />

with small amount <strong>of</strong> lime or fertilizer (DEBERGH <strong>and</strong> MAENE, 1981; TORRES,<br />

1989). MAENE <strong>and</strong> DEBERGH (1983) observed that the choice <strong>of</strong> a substrate,<br />

the concentration <strong>and</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> IBA treatment, <strong>and</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the shoots could<br />

affect in vivo rooting <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots as demonstrated in Cordyline<br />

terminalis <strong>and</strong> Ficus benjamina. SHARMA et al. (1999) reported that the<br />

optimization <strong>of</strong> harvesting time <strong>of</strong> microshoots, shoot size, soil pH, plant growth<br />

regulator treatment, CO2 enrichment <strong>and</strong> light conditions in specially designed<br />

hardening chambers significantly affected the success rate <strong>of</strong> hardening Camellia<br />

sinensis microshoots.<br />

The success <strong>of</strong> micropropagation ultimately lies not only in the production <strong>of</strong> large<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> plantlets but also on their survival rate in field conditions. As stated by<br />

RAZDAN (2003), tissue cultured plants generally manifest some structural <strong>and</strong><br />

physiological abnormalities which make them vulnerable to transplantation shocks.<br />

The author listed such abnormalities to include noticeable decrease in epicuticular<br />

wax, abnormal leaf morphology <strong>and</strong> anatomy, poor photosynthetic efficiency,<br />

malfunctioning <strong>of</strong> stomata, <strong>and</strong> hypolignified stems. These abnormalities <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

lead to high water loss, high susceptibility to leaf scorch by sun <strong>and</strong> poor survival<br />

<strong>of</strong> micropropagated plants. SANTAMARIA et al. (1993) however, reported that<br />

high rates <strong>of</strong> water loss from micropropagated Delphinium leaves were not due to<br />

high rates <strong>of</strong> cuticular transpiration but linked to a lack <strong>of</strong> stomatal control. In a<br />

similar vein, SANTAMARIA <strong>and</strong> KERSTIENS (1994) strongly argued <strong>and</strong><br />

concluded that the lack <strong>of</strong> control <strong>of</strong> water loss shown by various micropropagated<br />

plants is not associated with poor cuticular development, but rather related to the<br />

failure <strong>of</strong> stomata to close in response to leaf dehydration. Nevertheless,<br />

micropropagated plants are <strong>of</strong>ten placed in conditions <strong>of</strong> high relative humidity,<br />

20


partial shade <strong>and</strong> good even temperatures for acclimatization before their transfer<br />

to field conditions (TORRES, 1989). A condition <strong>of</strong> high relative humidity could be<br />

created by placing the plants under a transparent plastic tunnel or an intermittent<br />

mist system (DEBERGH <strong>and</strong> MAENE, 1981). The relative humidity could then be<br />

reduced gradually by gradually slitting the plastic bag or reducing the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

mist received by the plants (TORRES, 1989). MURASHIGE (1978) suggested the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> foliar feeding until an effective rooting system is developed. According to<br />

RAZDAN (2003), partial defoliation <strong>and</strong> the application <strong>of</strong> transpirants (1%<br />

Acropol, v/v) in the initial stages <strong>of</strong> transpiration have been reported to improve the<br />

survival frequency by reducing water loss. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the use <strong>of</strong><br />

antitranspirants to reduce water loss during acclimatization, though suggested as<br />

a positive measure by some researchers, is said to have mixed results (see the<br />

review by HAZARIKA, 2003).<br />

From the above review <strong>of</strong> the stages in micropropagation, it is clear that success<br />

in micropropagation depends on a host <strong>of</strong> factors. The factors could possibly be<br />

classified into three aspects, which are: (i) the chemical composition <strong>and</strong> physical<br />

qualities <strong>of</strong> the medium (MURASHIGE, 1974), (ii) the culture environment qualities<br />

(MURASHIGE, 1974), <strong>and</strong> (iii) the physiology <strong>of</strong> the plant species. A suitable in<br />

vitro medium contains all essential nutrients (macro <strong>and</strong> micro) in appropriate<br />

proportions, a carbohydrate source (such as sucrose <strong>and</strong> glucose), vitamins (like<br />

nicotinic acid <strong>and</strong> pyridoxine) <strong>and</strong> plant growth regulators (mainly auxins <strong>and</strong><br />

cytokinins). Some st<strong>and</strong>ard basal media formulated <strong>and</strong> commonly used include<br />

MS medium (MURASHIGE <strong>and</strong> SKOOG, 1962), B5 medium (GAMBORG et al.,<br />

1968), White‟s medium (WHITE, 1963), as well as SH medium (SCHENK <strong>and</strong><br />

HILDERBRANDT, 1972). Of these, MS medium remains the most widely used.<br />

MURASHIGE (1974) observed that the types <strong>and</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> auxin <strong>and</strong><br />

cytokinin are the most critical organic components <strong>of</strong> plant propagation media. The<br />

active but hidden role <strong>of</strong> tissue endogenous growth regulators in plant growth <strong>and</strong><br />

development must however, not be ignored since the exogenously applied growth<br />

regulators <strong>of</strong>ten interact with the endogenous ones, which may even be <strong>of</strong> a<br />

different group (such as abscisic acid, ethylene <strong>and</strong> gibberellins) (GASPAR et al.,<br />

1996). MURASHIGE (1974) further observed that light <strong>and</strong> temperature are the<br />

major environmental factors affecting tissue culture. The effects <strong>of</strong> auxins <strong>and</strong><br />

21


cytokinins as well as these major environmental factors (light <strong>and</strong> temperature) on<br />

in vitro plant regeneration are reviewed in the next two sections <strong>of</strong> this Chapter.<br />

2.1.7 Effects <strong>of</strong> auxins <strong>and</strong> cytokinins on plant regeneration in micropropagation<br />

Auxins <strong>and</strong> cytokinins are usually required for growth <strong>and</strong> morphogenesis <strong>and</strong> are<br />

therefore frequently added to the culture media. According to DAVIES (2004), the<br />

regulatory role <strong>of</strong> plant growth regulators in growth <strong>and</strong> development depends on<br />

three main factors. These are: (i) the amount present – a factor that is regulated by<br />

biosynthesis, degradation <strong>and</strong> conjugation (ii) the location <strong>of</strong> the growth regulator –<br />

a factor affected by movement or transport (iii) the sensitivity (or responsiveness)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the tissue – a factor which involves the presence <strong>of</strong> receptors <strong>and</strong> signal-<br />

transduction chain components. The exogenous application <strong>of</strong> many growth<br />

regulators may however modify the synthesis, degradation, activation,<br />

sequestration or translocation <strong>of</strong>, as well as sensitivity to endogenous growth<br />

regulators <strong>of</strong> the same or different type (GASPAR et al., 1996; KAMĺNEK et al.,<br />

1997).<br />

Figure 2.1 presents the structure <strong>of</strong> some frequently used auxins in plant tissue<br />

culture. IAA is regarded as the most common naturally occurring auxin in plants<br />

(MUDAY <strong>and</strong> DELONG, 2001). In general, auxins exist in plant cells either as free<br />

acids or in conjugated forms. They can be conjugated to sugars (such as<br />

monosaccharides <strong>and</strong> high molecular weight polysaccharides) <strong>and</strong> sugar alcohols<br />

(such as myo-inositol) through ester linkages or to single amino acids, peptides<br />

<strong>and</strong> proteins through amide linkages (NORMANLY et al., 2004; BAJGUZ <strong>and</strong><br />

PIOTROWSKA, 2009). The formation <strong>of</strong> auxin conjugates is a mechanism<br />

involved in the homeostatic control <strong>of</strong> auxin levels in plant cells (BAJGUZ <strong>and</strong><br />

PIOTROWSKA, 2009). Free auxins, when in excess, can be stored <strong>and</strong><br />

transported in conjugate forms. Such conjugated molecules are protected from<br />

oxidative breakdown <strong>and</strong> may be later hydrolysed enzymatically to release free<br />

auxin when required (GASPAR et al., 1996). The formation <strong>and</strong> hydrolysis <strong>of</strong><br />

auxin conjugates as well as the conjugate pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> endogenous auxin differ<br />

among plant tissues <strong>and</strong> are controlled by the developmental stage <strong>of</strong> the plant<br />

(RAMPEY et al., 2004; BAJGUZ <strong>and</strong> PIOTROWSKA, 2009). The exogenous<br />

22


application <strong>of</strong> different auxins may lead to a distinct physiological <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

morphogenic response in different explants due to variation in their endogenous<br />

growth regulator pr<strong>of</strong>ile at the time <strong>of</strong> excision, determined by their growth <strong>and</strong><br />

developmental stage.<br />

Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)<br />

Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA)<br />

α-Naphtalene acetic acid (NAA)<br />

2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)<br />

Figure 2.1: Molecular structures <strong>of</strong> some auxins commonly used in plant tissue<br />

culture.<br />

23


Auxins are known to play a crucial role in regulating or influencing growth <strong>and</strong><br />

developmental processes such as cell expansion, cell wall acidification, initiation <strong>of</strong><br />

cell division, differentiation <strong>of</strong> vascular tissue <strong>and</strong> organization <strong>of</strong> meristems giving<br />

rise to either unorganized tissue (callus) or defined organs (GASPAR et al., 1996;<br />

MUDAY <strong>and</strong> DELONG, 2001). Responses such as callus production, induction <strong>of</strong><br />

somatic embryogenesis, shoot production, rooting <strong>and</strong> secondary metabolite<br />

production in growth media supplemented with different auxin concentrations have<br />

been reported by many researchers (NIGRA et al., 1987; DE KLERK et al., 1997;<br />

SUN et al., 2008; AZAD et al., 2009; BASKARAN et al., 2009). Depending on<br />

the objective, PIERIK (1987) encouraged limiting the use <strong>of</strong> 2,4–D due to its ability<br />

to induce mutations <strong>and</strong>/or inhibit photosynthesis. GASPAR et al. (1996) noted<br />

that, in addition to the modifying effect <strong>of</strong> other growth regulators (ALONI, 1995;<br />

LIU <strong>and</strong> REID, 1992), the activity <strong>of</strong> auxins can be affected by the free availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> boron. They noted that both the translocation <strong>of</strong> IAA <strong>and</strong> nuclear RNA synthesis<br />

in response to auxin treatment can be inhibited in boron-deficient plants.<br />

Furthermore, the endogenous level <strong>of</strong> IAA can be regulated by its photo-oxidation<br />

(RAY, 1958) when cultures are over-exposed to light. The rapid metabolism <strong>of</strong><br />

auxins such as IAA <strong>and</strong> IBA within plant tissues may be useful in automatically<br />

changing the auxin:cytokinin ratio in culture (for example, during callus production<br />

followed by organogenesis) or when less auxin is required for a subsequent<br />

developmental phase in the same culture (for example, during root elongation<br />

following root induction) (GASPAR et al., 1996).<br />

The structures <strong>of</strong> some commonly used cytokinins in tissue culture are shown in<br />

Figure 2.2. Cytokinins such as zeatin <strong>and</strong> isopentenyladenine with isoprenoid<br />

derived chains attached at their N 6 terminal are <strong>of</strong>ten described as isoprenoid<br />

cytokinins. The aromatic cytokinins (such as benzyladenine <strong>and</strong> topolins) have an<br />

aromatic derivative side chain at their N 6 terminal. Cytokinins can be found in<br />

different forms such as free bases, ribosides, nucleotides, N-glucosides <strong>and</strong> O-<br />

glucosides (OG) in plant cells (LETHAM <strong>and</strong> PALNI, 1983) <strong>and</strong> their endogenous<br />

levels <strong>of</strong>ten regulate their physiological activities (KAMĺNEK et al., 1997). The<br />

exogenous application <strong>of</strong> cytokinins, their uptake <strong>and</strong> metabolism in turn influence<br />

the endogenous cytokinin levels in plant cells (KAMĺNEK et al., 1997). STRNAD<br />

(1997) classified the metabolism <strong>of</strong> cytokinins from a physiological perspective into<br />

24


four main categories. These include: (i) their interconversion, (ii) hydroxylation, (iii)<br />

conjugation, <strong>and</strong> (iv) degradation.<br />

According to LETHAM <strong>and</strong> PALNI (1983), exogenous cytokinin bases are<br />

converted by plant tissues into various types <strong>of</strong> metabolites. Such metabolites<br />

include products <strong>of</strong> ring substitution (ribosides, nucleotides, N-glucosides), <strong>and</strong><br />

products <strong>of</strong> isoprenoid side chain cleavage (adenine, adenosine, adenosine-5'-<br />

monophosphate) <strong>and</strong> substitution (O-glucosides) (LETHAM <strong>and</strong> PALNI, 1983).<br />

The authors suggested that these metabolites could be active forms <strong>of</strong> cytokinin,<br />

translocation forms, storage forms (releasing free cytokinin when needed), or<br />

detoxification products (formed when exogenous levels become too high <strong>and</strong><br />

toxic), amongst others. According to STRNAD (1997), there is indirect evidence<br />

suggesting that the free cytokinin bases are most likely the biologically active<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> cytokinins. That being the case, the interconversion <strong>of</strong> cytokinin bases,<br />

nucleosides <strong>and</strong> nucleotides is an important process in the regulation <strong>of</strong> cytokinin<br />

activity (CHEN, 1997; BAJGUZ <strong>and</strong> PIOTROWSKA, 2009). The stereo- <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

regiospecific hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> isoprenoid <strong>and</strong> aromatic cytokinins, respectively, is<br />

another factor that could regulate cytokinin activity (KAMĺNEK et al., 1979;<br />

KAMĺNEK et al., 1987a; STRNAD, 1997). KAMĺNEK et al. (1987a) observed that<br />

the hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> the phenyl ring <strong>of</strong> N 6 -benzyladenosine in meta-position<br />

increased cytokinin activity in tobacco callus <strong>and</strong> wheat leaf chlorophyll retention<br />

bioassays. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, they noted that the hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> the phenyl ring<br />

in ortho- <strong>and</strong> para-positions significantly decreased cytokinin activity, suggesting a<br />

possible regulation <strong>of</strong> cytokinin biological activity by a position specific<br />

hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> the side chain.<br />

25


6-Benzyladenine (BA)<br />

6-Furfurylaminopurine (Kinetin)<br />

trans-Zeatin (Z)<br />

N 6 -Isopentenyladenine (iP)<br />

Dihydrozeatin (DHZ)<br />

meta-Topolin (mT)<br />

meta-Topolin riboside (mTR)<br />

26


meta-Methoxytopolin riboside (MemTR)<br />

Figure 2.2: Molecular structures <strong>of</strong> some cytokinins commonly used in plant<br />

tissue culture.<br />

STRNAD (1997) noted that the glucosides, unlike the ribosyl <strong>and</strong> alanyl<br />

conjugates, are not limited to the N 9 position <strong>of</strong> the purine ring, hence they appear<br />

to be the most prominent among the cytokinin conjugates. Owing to this, according<br />

to the author, cytokinin glycosides are widespread in the plant kingdom <strong>and</strong> exist<br />

in different metabolic forms. They play indispensable roles in plant growth <strong>and</strong><br />

developmental processes. In many experiments involving the exogenous<br />

application <strong>of</strong> BA, for example, N-glucoside metabolites such as [3G]BA, [7G]BA<br />

<strong>and</strong> [9G]BA have been identified in plant cells <strong>and</strong> tissues, the latter two usually<br />

being the major ones (LETHAM <strong>and</strong> PALNI, 1983; WERBROUCK et al., 1995;<br />

VAN STADEN <strong>and</strong> CROUCH, 1996). BA is an aromatic cytokinin most widely<br />

used in the micropropagation industry due to its effectiveness <strong>and</strong><br />

inexpensiveness (BAIRU et al., 2007). The [3G]BA metabolite reportedly exhibited<br />

a markedly greater cytokinin-like activity in different bioassays compared to<br />

[7G]BA <strong>and</strong> [9G]BA, but a weak activity when compared to its corresponding base<br />

(see the review by VAN STADEN <strong>and</strong> CROUCH, 1996). As demonstrated in<br />

radish cotyledons (LETHAM <strong>and</strong> GOLLNOW, 1985) <strong>and</strong> soybean callus (VAN<br />

27


STADEN <strong>and</strong> DREWES, 1992), the relatively high activity <strong>of</strong> [3G]BA is likely due<br />

to cleavage <strong>of</strong> the 3-glucoside moiety to release free BA (VAN STADEN <strong>and</strong><br />

CROUCH, 1996). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the metabolites [7G]BA <strong>and</strong> [9G]BA are said<br />

to be products <strong>of</strong> irreversible inactivation <strong>of</strong> cytokinins which regulate levels <strong>of</strong> the<br />

active free bases (STRNAD, 1997). They are extremely stable in plant tissues <strong>and</strong><br />

biologically relatively inactive, especially [9G]BA (LALOUE, 1977; AUER et al.,<br />

1992). Indeed, the accumulation <strong>of</strong> [9G]BA in the basal part <strong>of</strong> Spathiphyllum<br />

floribundum was reported to be responsible for heterogeneity in growth <strong>and</strong><br />

inhibition <strong>of</strong> rooting during the acclimatization <strong>of</strong> this species (WERBROUCK et<br />

al., 1995). BAIRU et al (2007) were <strong>of</strong> a similar opinion that the negative effect <strong>of</strong><br />

BA on ex vitro growth <strong>of</strong> Aloe polyphylla could be due to the accumulation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stable derivative, [9G]BA.<br />

WERBROUCK et al. (1996) suggested two alternatives to the use <strong>of</strong> BA in<br />

micropropagation systems due to the problems associated with its exogenous<br />

application. One is the use <strong>of</strong> BA derivatives which are already conjugated at the<br />

N 9 position (such as [9R]BA) as they are better protected against N 9 -glucosylation.<br />

The second alternative is the use <strong>of</strong> hydroxylated BA analogues, mainly the<br />

topolins. Many researchers have indeed demonstrated the superiority <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

topolins over some commonly used cytokinins in micropropagation <strong>of</strong> different<br />

species. KUBALÁKOVÁ <strong>and</strong> STRNAD (1992), for example, observed a high<br />

shoot formation frequency in sugar beet on medium containing meta-topolin (mT)<br />

compared to BA <strong>and</strong> zeatin. WERBROUCK et al. (1996) reported improved<br />

rooting in Spathiphyllum floribundum with the use <strong>of</strong> mT compared to BA. The use<br />

<strong>of</strong> mT improved shoot multiplication <strong>of</strong> Curcuma longa compared to BA, kinetin<br />

<strong>and</strong> zeatin (SALVI et al., 2002). Other reported effects <strong>of</strong> topolins include<br />

improved survival rate <strong>of</strong> in vitro grown potato (BAROJA-FERNÁNDEZ et al.,<br />

2002), higher multiplication rates <strong>of</strong> plantain by mT (ESCALONA et al., 2003),<br />

histogenic stability <strong>of</strong> Petunia meristem <strong>and</strong> anti-senescing activity <strong>of</strong> rose cultures<br />

by MemTR (BOGAERT et al., 2006), improved multiplication <strong>and</strong> control <strong>of</strong><br />

hyperhydricity in Aloe polyphylla by mT (BAIRU et al., 2007), superior<br />

multiplication rates by mT <strong>and</strong> mTR in two banana cultivars (BAIRU et al., 2008)<br />

<strong>and</strong> lower percentages <strong>of</strong> necrotic shoot-tips in Harpagophytum procumbens in<br />

treatments containing mTR (BAIRU et al., 2009).<br />

28


In general, the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> topolins has been attributed to its distinct<br />

metabolism from that <strong>of</strong> BA (STRNAD, 1997). Their metabolites in plant tissues<br />

are mainly the O-glucosides, a glucosylation made possible by the hydroxy group<br />

on the benzyl ring (WERBROUCK et al., 1996; MALÁ et al., 2009). STRNAD<br />

(1997) stated that these metabolites appear to be biologically active intrinsically or<br />

as products <strong>of</strong> β-glucosidase activity (LETHAM <strong>and</strong> PALNI, 1983) <strong>and</strong> are not<br />

clear substrates for cytokinin oxidase. Furthermore, studies have revealed that the<br />

O-glucosides may be storage forms <strong>of</strong> cytokinin, stable under certain conditions<br />

<strong>and</strong> rapidly converted to biologically active forms when required (PARKER et al.,<br />

1978; WERBROUCK et al., 1996; STRNAD, 1997). STRNAD (1997) therefore<br />

concluded that the reversible sequestration <strong>of</strong> aromatic cytokinin O-glucosides<br />

may confer stability <strong>and</strong> continuous availability over an extended period <strong>of</strong> time at<br />

a physiologically active level, resulting in improved shoot multiplication in plants<br />

cultured in vitro.<br />

Many developmental processes in plants such as cell growth, cell division <strong>and</strong><br />

differentiation as well as organogenesis in tissue <strong>and</strong> organ cultures are controlled<br />

by an interaction between cytokinins <strong>and</strong> auxins (GASPAR et al., 1996). For<br />

instance, it is well known that a high cytokinin to auxin ratio generally favours<br />

shoot production whereas a high auxin to cytokinin ratio favours root formation. It<br />

should be noted however, that the cytokinin levels could be regulated by auxin<br />

levels (KAMĺNEK et al., 1997). These authors noted that auxin may down regulate<br />

cytokinin levels on one h<strong>and</strong>, by inhibiting cytokinin biosynthesis. On the other<br />

h<strong>and</strong>, auxin may promote cytokinin metabolic inactivation by N-glucosylation or<br />

degradation by cytokinin oxidase. Either way, auxin can strikingly decrease<br />

cytokinin to auxin ratio <strong>and</strong> induce certain physiological events (KAMĺNEK et al.,<br />

1997).<br />

2.1.8 Environmental factors affecting micropropagation<br />

2.1.8.1 Light<br />

Light duration (photoperiod), intensity (photosynthetic photon flux, PPF) <strong>and</strong><br />

spectral quality are among the important environmental factors affecting plant<br />

29


growth <strong>and</strong> development throughout the culture period (MURASHIGE, 1974).<br />

They regulate photomorphogenetic processes in tissue cultures <strong>and</strong> can lead to<br />

improved plant quality <strong>and</strong> growth rate (ECONOMOU <strong>and</strong> READ, 1987). Their<br />

influence on the levels <strong>of</strong> endogenous plant growth regulators may elicit different<br />

morphological responses in different plant species (MACHÁČKOVA et al., 1992;<br />

TAPINGKAE <strong>and</strong> TAJI, 2000). KAMADA et al. (1995) reported adventitious bud<br />

formation in root explants <strong>of</strong> horseradish treated with auxin alone <strong>and</strong> cultured<br />

under a 16 h photoperiod. No adventitious buds were produced when the cultures<br />

were incubated under continuous darkness. They further observed that treatment<br />

with cytokinin alone induced bud formation under both continuous dark <strong>and</strong> 16 h<br />

light conditions. They attributed their results to light inducing either the activation <strong>of</strong><br />

cytokinin biosynthesis or reduction <strong>of</strong> cytokinin degradation, resulting in an<br />

increased endogenous cytokinin level relative to that <strong>of</strong> auxin.<br />

Shoot multiplication reportedly improved in shoot-tip cultures <strong>of</strong> Pelargonium<br />

species (DEBERGH <strong>and</strong> MAENE, 1977) <strong>and</strong> leaf explants <strong>of</strong> Peperomia<br />

sc<strong>and</strong>ens (KUKLCZANKA et al., 1977) maintained under continuous light. On the<br />

other h<strong>and</strong>, ECONOMOU <strong>and</strong> READ (1986) observed a decrease in the shoot<br />

length <strong>and</strong> quality during the first reculture (transfer without subdivision), <strong>and</strong> in<br />

number <strong>of</strong> shoots during the second reculture <strong>of</strong> azalea (Rhododendron species)<br />

placed under continuous light. JO et al. (2008) noted that the shoot length, root<br />

length, number <strong>of</strong> roots, leaf area, plant fresh weight, dry weight, chlorophyll <strong>and</strong><br />

carotenoid content in Alocasia amazonica increased under shorter day (8/16 h)<br />

<strong>and</strong> equinoctial (12/12 h) (light/dark cycle) photoperiods. MORINI et al. (1991)<br />

however, observed that although shoot production in plum (Prunus cerasifera) was<br />

not statistically different between 12 <strong>and</strong> 16 h photoperiods, the 8 h photoperiod<br />

gave a much lower shoot production rate. In addition, PATERSON <strong>and</strong> ROSE<br />

(1979) reported better shoot production in leaf explants <strong>of</strong> Crassula argenta<br />

cultured under constant darkness. It is therefore evident that different photoperiods<br />

may elicit different morphogenic response in different species or explants.<br />

ECONOMOU <strong>and</strong> READ (1987), in their review, showed that root formation may<br />

be inhibited by light duration in some species. They listed some factors likely to be<br />

responsible for such responses which include insufficient IAA synthesis or IAA<br />

30


eakdown, photo-inactivation <strong>of</strong> factors promoting root formation, inhibition <strong>of</strong><br />

rooting c<strong>of</strong>actor synthesis (phenolic compounds) or stimulation <strong>of</strong> c<strong>of</strong>actor<br />

breakdown as well as production <strong>of</strong> anatomical or histological barriers.<br />

JO et al. (2008) observed that the shoot length, bulb size, leaf area, as well as<br />

fresh <strong>and</strong> dry matter yields in plants regenerated from Alocasia amazonica leaf<br />

explants, cultured under very low PPF (15 <strong>and</strong> 30 µmol m -2 s -1 ) were more or less<br />

the same. These values however decreased in plants cultured at higher PPF (60<br />

<strong>and</strong> 90 µmol m -2 s -1 ). Conversely, ECONOMOU <strong>and</strong> READ (1986) reported<br />

increased number, length <strong>and</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> shoots obtained from in vitro-derived<br />

shoot explants <strong>of</strong> Rhododendron species cultured under PPF <strong>of</strong> 30 <strong>and</strong> 75 µmol<br />

m -2 s -1 compared to those cultured under a 10 µmol m -2 s -1 PPF. In a similar vein,<br />

TAPINGKAE <strong>and</strong> TAJI (2000) recorded a significant increase in the dry weight <strong>of</strong><br />

Anigozanthos bicolor roots with an increase in PPF (up to 200 µmol m -2 s -1 ). They<br />

further observed the highest number <strong>of</strong> roots under a white light while yellow <strong>and</strong><br />

red lights significantly increased root length, suggesting the participation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

phytochrome system in the rhizogenesis <strong>of</strong> this species. The authors were <strong>of</strong> the<br />

opinion that the rate <strong>of</strong> auxin breakdown in the media over time may be faster<br />

under red <strong>and</strong> yellow light conditions, resulting in increased root elongation.<br />

2.1.8.2 Temperature<br />

In order to derive the most benefits from the tissue culture propagation <strong>of</strong> a<br />

particular plant species, its precise temperature needs must be met<br />

(MURASHIGE, 1974). This is particularly important as the activities <strong>of</strong> the<br />

enzymes involved in many biochemical reactions increase at optimum<br />

temperatures. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, low temperature could modify the levels <strong>of</strong> plant<br />

growth regulators by stimulating the activity <strong>of</strong> cytokinin oxidase (VESELOVA et<br />

al., 2005), prolong cell cycle process <strong>and</strong> activate cold acclimation signalling<br />

pathways (XIA et al., 2009). In general, in vitro cultures are <strong>of</strong>ten maintained at a<br />

constant temperature <strong>of</strong> approximately 25°C in many micropropagation protocols.<br />

In an experiment carried out on four accessions <strong>of</strong> mint plants (Mentha spp.),<br />

ISLAM et al. (2005) observed that both the apical <strong>and</strong> nodal explants cultured at<br />

25°C exhibited better in vitro growth compared to those cultured at 20°C.<br />

31


HASEGAWA et al (1973) reported a constant temperature <strong>of</strong> 27°C as the<br />

optimum temperature for in vitro plant formation <strong>of</strong> Asparagus <strong>of</strong>ficinalis through<br />

shoot apex culture. Although many annual <strong>and</strong> tropical species whose life cycles<br />

are completed during a period <strong>of</strong> relatively uniform temperature conditions may<br />

respond well under constant temperatures, some other species such as those<br />

adapted to temperate <strong>and</strong> desert climates may respond better under periodically<br />

varied temperature conditions (MURASHIGE, 1974). KOZAI et al (1995) reported<br />

increases in stem length <strong>and</strong> internode length <strong>of</strong> Solanum tuberosum cultures as<br />

the difference in photoperiod <strong>and</strong> dark period temperatures (DIF) increased. An<br />

increase in plantlet growth with increased DIF was similarly reported in Rehmannia<br />

glutinosa (CUI et al., 2001).<br />

2.1.9 Tissue culture <strong>of</strong> the families: Acanthaceae <strong>and</strong> Asclepiadaceae<br />

With the exception <strong>of</strong> published articles from this research, the available literature<br />

reveals no published reports on the in vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> species <strong>and</strong><br />

Huernia species. However, successful micropropagation has been reported in the<br />

families Acanthaceae <strong>and</strong> Asclepiadaceae (Table 2.1), to which the genera<br />

<strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>and</strong> Huernia belong. As Table 2.1 shows, different parts <strong>of</strong> a plant can<br />

serve as explant sources <strong>and</strong> regeneration can be accomplished through axillary<br />

shoot proliferation, adventitious shoot production <strong>and</strong>/or somatic embryogenesis.<br />

In addition, the production <strong>of</strong> valuable secondary metabolites was reported in<br />

induced callus in some cases.<br />

32


Table 2.1: List <strong>of</strong> some tissue cultured plant species in the Acanthaceae <strong>and</strong> Asclepiadaceae families<br />

Plant species Explant Response Reference<br />

Acanthaceae<br />

Adhatoda beddomei Node Axillary shoots, callus SUDHA <strong>and</strong> SEENI (1994)<br />

Adhatoda vasica Shoot-tip Axillary shoots ANAND <strong>and</strong> BANSAL (1998)<br />

Adhatoda zeylanica Leaf, petiole Callus, somatic embryos, roots JAYAPAUL et al. (2005)<br />

Andrographis paniculata Leaf, internode Callus, somatic embryos MARTIN (2004a)<br />

Aphel<strong>and</strong>ra sinclairiana Anther, root, leaf Callus NEZBEDOVÁ et al. (1999)<br />

Aphel<strong>and</strong>ra tetragona Petiole, leaf Callus NEZBEDOVÁ et al. (1999)<br />

Cross<strong>and</strong>ra infundibuliformis Bud Axillary shoots GIRIJA et al. (1999)<br />

Justicia gendarussa Leaf, node Callus, adventitious shoots RAGHUVANSHI et al. (1994), AGASTIAN et<br />

Nilgirianthus ciliatus Leaf, node,<br />

Asclepiadaceae<br />

internode<br />

al. (2006)<br />

Callus, adventitious shoots DEVI <strong>and</strong> KAMALAM (2007)<br />

Asclepias curassavica Node Shoots, roots, callus PRAMANIK <strong>and</strong> DATTA (1986)<br />

Calotropis gigantean Hypocotyl,<br />

immature embryo,<br />

stem, leaf<br />

Callus, adventitious shoots ROY et al. (2000), ROY <strong>and</strong> DE (1990)<br />

Calotropis procera Cotyledon Callus, laticifer differentiation SURI <strong>and</strong> RAMAWAT (1996)<br />

33


Table 2.1 continued<br />

Plant species Explant Response Reference<br />

Ceropegia bulbosa<br />

var. bulbosa<br />

Ceropegia bulbosa<br />

var. lushii<br />

Node, stem, leaf,<br />

bud<br />

Ceropegia c<strong>and</strong>elabrum Node, leaf,<br />

Axillary shoots, adventitious shoots,<br />

callus, flowering, microtubers,<br />

somatic embryos<br />

Node, stem, leaf Axillary shoots, callus, microtubers,<br />

internode<br />

somatic embryos<br />

Axillary shoots, callus, somatic<br />

embryos<br />

Ceropegia hirsuta Bud Axillary shoots, adventitious shoots,<br />

flowering<br />

Ceropegia jainii Node, stem, leaf Axillary shoots, callus, microtubers,<br />

somatic embryos, flowering<br />

Ceropegia juncea Node, internode Axillary shoots, callus, adventitious<br />

shots, roots<br />

Ceropegia lawii Bud Axillary shoots, adventitious shoots,<br />

flowering<br />

Ceropegia maccannii Bud Axillary shoots, adventitious shoots,<br />

flowering<br />

Ceropegia oculata Bud Axillary shoots, adventitious shoots,<br />

flowering<br />

Ceropegia sahyadrica Bud Axillary shoots, adventitious shoots,<br />

flowering<br />

PATIL (1998), NAIR et al. (2007), BRITTO et<br />

al. (2003)<br />

PATIL (1998)<br />

BEENA et al. (2003), BEENA <strong>and</strong> MARTIN<br />

(2003)<br />

NAIR et al. (2007)<br />

PATIL (1998)<br />

NIKAM <strong>and</strong> SAVANT (2009)<br />

NAIR et al. (2007)<br />

NAIR et al. (2007)<br />

NAIR et al. (2007)<br />

NAIR et al. (2007)<br />

34


Table 2.1 continued<br />

Plant species Explant Response Reference<br />

Cryptolepis buchanani Leaf, internode Callus VENKATESWARA et al. (1987)<br />

Decalepis hamiltonii Leaf, shoot-tip Callus, somatic embryos,<br />

Gymnema sylvestre Node, hypocotyl,<br />

cotyledon, leaf<br />

Hemidesmus indicus Leaf, root, node,<br />

shoot-tip, root<br />

Holostemma ada-kodien Node, internode,<br />

leaf<br />

adventitious shoots<br />

Axillary shoots, callus,somatic<br />

embryos<br />

Axillary shoots, callus, somatic<br />

embryogenesis, adventitious shoots<br />

Axillary shoots, callus, adventitious<br />

shoots, somatic embryos<br />

GIRIDHAR et al. (2004, 2005)<br />

KOMALAVALLI <strong>and</strong> RAO (2000), ASHOK<br />

KUMAR et al. (2002)<br />

PATNAIK <strong>and</strong> DEBATA (1996), SARASAN<br />

et al. (1994), MISRA et al. (2005), RAMULU<br />

et al. (2003)<br />

MARTIN (2002), MARTIN (2003)<br />

Holostemma annulare Shoot-tip, node Axillary shoots, callus SUDHA et al. (1998)<br />

Leptadenia reticulata Node, leaf,<br />

internode, shoot tip<br />

Axillary shoots, callus, somatic<br />

embryos<br />

ARYA et al. (2003), MARTIN (2004b)<br />

Pergularia daemia Shoot-tip, node Shoots KIRANMAI et al. (2007)<br />

Sarcostemma brevistigma Node Axillary shoots, callus, adventitious<br />

Tylophora indica Stem, leaf, node,<br />

petiole<br />

shoots<br />

Callus, somatic embryos, axillary<br />

shoots, adventitious shoots<br />

THOMAS <strong>and</strong> SHANKAR (2009)<br />

RAO <strong>and</strong> NARAYANASWAMI (1972),<br />

MANJULA et al. (2000), SHARMA <strong>and</strong><br />

CHANDEL (1992), THOMAS <strong>and</strong> PHILIP<br />

(2005), FAISAL et al. (2005)<br />

35


2.2 Pharmacological <strong>and</strong> phytochemical investigation <strong>of</strong> plant extracts<br />

2.2.1 Introduction<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> natural products in disease prevention <strong>and</strong> control as well as in drug<br />

development has received increased attention in recent times. According to<br />

RATES (2001), about 25% <strong>of</strong> the globally prescribed drugs are obtained from<br />

plants. The author observed that 11% <strong>of</strong> the 252 drugs considered as basic <strong>and</strong><br />

essential by the World Health Organisation are solely <strong>of</strong> plant origin. This growing<br />

interest in the therapeutic use <strong>of</strong> drugs <strong>of</strong> plant origin has been attributed to some<br />

factors such as (i) the side effects <strong>and</strong> ineffective therapy <strong>of</strong> conventional<br />

medicine, (ii) the incorrect <strong>and</strong>/or abusive use <strong>of</strong> synthetic drugs resulting in<br />

undesired side effects <strong>and</strong> other problems, (iii) the inaccessibility <strong>of</strong> a large part <strong>of</strong><br />

the world‟s population to conventional pharmacological treatment, <strong>and</strong> (iv) the<br />

suggestion created by folk medicine <strong>and</strong> ecological awareness that natural<br />

products are <strong>of</strong>ten harmless (RATES, 2001). In many parts <strong>of</strong> the world, especially<br />

in Africa, the increasing use <strong>of</strong> plants in traditional medicines by a growing<br />

population, among other reasons, has resulted in the over-exploitation <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong><br />

our plant resources.<br />

Plants, in addition to their therapeutic use in herbal preparations, can serve as<br />

important sources <strong>of</strong> new drugs, new drug leads <strong>and</strong> new chemical entities<br />

(BALUNAS <strong>and</strong> KINGHORN, 2005). However, a large percentage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

estimated 350, 000 plant species on earth is yet to be investigated for their<br />

pharmacological <strong>and</strong> phytochemical potential (HOSTETTMAN <strong>and</strong> MARSTON,<br />

2002). SHAI et al. (2008) for example, noted that some South African indigenous<br />

plant species are at risk <strong>of</strong> becoming extinct before the investigation <strong>and</strong><br />

application <strong>of</strong> their potential as sources <strong>of</strong> therapeutic drugs can be carried out.<br />

HOSTETTMANN <strong>and</strong> MARSTON (2002) recommended that urgent attention be<br />

given to the exploration <strong>of</strong> this „green inheritance‟ for their pharmacological <strong>and</strong><br />

phytochemical potential, especially due to the rapid disappearance <strong>of</strong> our tropical<br />

forests <strong>and</strong> other important vegetation areas. Some <strong>of</strong> these plant resources<br />

(including those rapidly disappearing) could contain novel, active chemotypes that<br />

can serve as leads for effective drug development (CRAGG et al., 1997).<br />

36


The dual chemical-biological screening approach has been recommended as the<br />

fastest method <strong>of</strong> discovering important plant-derived bioactive compounds<br />

(HOSTETTMAN <strong>and</strong> MARSTON, 2002). The localisation <strong>of</strong> such active<br />

compounds however, requires the use <strong>of</strong> simple but sensitive target-specific<br />

bioassays, since plant extract <strong>of</strong>ten contains low concentrations <strong>of</strong> active<br />

compounds (RATES, 2001; HOSTETTMAN <strong>and</strong> MARSTON, 2002). The main<br />

targets for biological tests can be lower organisms (bacteria, fungi <strong>and</strong> viruses),<br />

invertebrates (insects, crustaceans <strong>and</strong> molluscs), isolated subcellular systems<br />

(enzymes <strong>and</strong> receptors), animal or human cell cultures, isolated organs <strong>of</strong><br />

vertebrates, or whole animals (HOSTETTMAN <strong>and</strong> MARSTON, 2002).<br />

Furthermore, since plants <strong>of</strong>ten contain a large number <strong>of</strong> promising compounds,<br />

there is a need to use a variety <strong>of</strong> test systems in order to detect other potential<br />

bioactivities (RATES, 2001; HOUGHTON et al., 2007). The use <strong>of</strong> solvents <strong>of</strong><br />

increasing polarity during extraction processes has also been recommended,<br />

especially when the chemical composition is unknown (WILLIAMSON et al., 1996;<br />

cited by RATES, 2001).<br />

2.2.2 Antimicrobial activity<br />

Some bacteria <strong>and</strong> fungi have been implicated in the pathology <strong>of</strong> many diseases.<br />

For example, the fungus C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans is known to be a pathogenic organism<br />

causing c<strong>and</strong>idosis (SHAI et al., 2008), while bacteria such as Eschericha coli,<br />

Staphylococcus aureus <strong>and</strong> Klebsiella pneumoniae are known to be involved in<br />

gastroenteritis or respiratory infections (MOISE <strong>and</strong> SCHENTAG, 2000; SUN et<br />

al., 2006). The occurrence <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> re-emerging infectious diseases with no<br />

effective therapies as well as the development <strong>of</strong> resistant pathogen strains to<br />

some currently used drugs necessitate the urgent <strong>and</strong> continuous search for<br />

potent <strong>and</strong> efficacious antimicrobial compounds (CRAGG et al., 1997).<br />

In the biological screening <strong>of</strong> plants for antibacterial activity, COS et al. (2006)<br />

recommended the use <strong>of</strong> a panel <strong>of</strong> test organisms consisting <strong>of</strong>, at least, a Gram-<br />

positive (such as S. aureus <strong>and</strong> Bacillus subtilis) <strong>and</strong> a Gram-negative (such as E.<br />

coli <strong>and</strong> K. pneumonia) bacterium. The use <strong>of</strong> yeasts (such as C. albicans),<br />

dermatophytes (such as Trichophyton mentagrophytes) <strong>and</strong> opportunistic<br />

37


filamentous fungi (such as Fusarium solani), are among the recommended fungi in<br />

the screening for antifungal activity (COS et al., 2006). These authors further<br />

suggested the use <strong>of</strong> American type culture collection (ATCC) strains as they are<br />

well-characterized.<br />

Besides the choice <strong>of</strong> test organisms, <strong>of</strong> vital importance is the choice <strong>of</strong> an<br />

appropriate screening method. The three commonly used antimicrobial screening<br />

methods are (i) agar-diffusion, (ii) bio-autographic, <strong>and</strong> (iii) dilution assays (COS et<br />

al., 2006; VAN VUUREN, 2008). The agar-diffusion method is said to be simple<br />

<strong>and</strong> can be used to screen a large number <strong>of</strong> test samples against one micro-<br />

organism (RĺOS <strong>and</strong> RECIO, 2005; VAN VUUREN, 2008). However, the<br />

differences in physical <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> test samples, such as the solubility, volatility<br />

<strong>and</strong> diffusion characteristics in agar, make it difficult to effectively compare the<br />

antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> different samples using the agar-diffusion method (COS et<br />

al., 2006). The bio-autographic assay, although highly sensitive, requires the<br />

complete removal <strong>of</strong> residual low volatile solvents <strong>and</strong> is applicable mainly to<br />

micro-organisms that easily grow on thin-layer-chromatographic (TLC) plates<br />

(COS et al., 2006). It is therefore mainly used in the isolation <strong>of</strong> bioactive<br />

antimicrobial compounds (VAN VUUREN, 2008). The dilution assay allows for the<br />

quantitative determination <strong>of</strong> the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for<br />

comparing the antimicrobial potency <strong>of</strong> test samples (VAN VUUREN, 2008). In<br />

addition to its usefulness in assaying polar <strong>and</strong> non-polar extracts as well as<br />

isolated compounds, the dilution assay method can be used to determine whether<br />

an extract or a compound has a lethal (-cidal) or static action at a particular<br />

concentration (COS et al., 2006). In general, as benchmarks for determining the<br />

potency <strong>of</strong> extracts, extracts with MIC values below 8 g/ml are considered as<br />

having some antimicrobial activity (FABRY et al., 1998) while those with MIC<br />

values less than 1 mg/ml are regarded as exhibiting interesting activity (RĺOS <strong>and</strong><br />

RECIO, 2005).<br />

Antimicrobial activity has been reported in some <strong>Barleria</strong> species. For example,<br />

MAREGESI et al. (2008) reported a MIC value <strong>of</strong> 1 mg/ml in B. eranthemoides<br />

root methanolic extract tested against Bacillus cereus. CHOMNAWANG et al.<br />

(2009) reported MIC values <strong>of</strong> 5.0, 2.5 <strong>and</strong> 5 mg/ml in B. lupulina ethanolic extract<br />

38


tested against S. aureus, S. epidermidis <strong>and</strong> methicillin-resistant S. aureus,<br />

respectively. Unspecified extracts <strong>of</strong> B. lupulina were reported to have minimum<br />

bactericidal concentration (MBC) values <strong>of</strong> 1.25 <strong>and</strong> 5.0 mg/ml against<br />

Propionibacterium acnes <strong>and</strong> S. epidermidis, respectively (CHOMNAWANG et al.,<br />

2005). KOSMULALAGE et al. (2007) reported antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> crude<br />

ethanolic extract <strong>of</strong> the aerial part <strong>of</strong> B. prionitis against S. aureus <strong>and</strong><br />

Pseudomonas aeruginosa using the paper disk diffusion method. The authors<br />

further reported the antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> three compounds isolated from this<br />

ethanolic extract against Bacillus cereus <strong>and</strong> P. aeruginosa (25 μg/disk) using the<br />

same method. As far as can be ascertained from the available literature however,<br />

no report has been made (with the exception <strong>of</strong> published materials from this<br />

thesis) on the antibacterial <strong>and</strong> antifungal activities <strong>of</strong> the different parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

three <strong>Barleria</strong> species in the present study as well as <strong>of</strong> any Huernia species.<br />

2.2.3 Anti-inflammatory activity<br />

Inflammation is a process implicated in the pathogenesis <strong>of</strong> many diseases like<br />

Alzheimer‟s disease, asthma <strong>and</strong> auto-immune diseases such as rheumatoid<br />

arthritis, multiple sclerosis <strong>and</strong> ulcerative colitis (HOWES <strong>and</strong> HOUGHTON, 2003;<br />

POLYA, 2003). It is an immunological response <strong>of</strong>ten elicited by tissue injury from<br />

bacterial <strong>and</strong> viral infection, wounding <strong>and</strong> other sources <strong>of</strong> damage (POLYA,<br />

2003; BYEON et al., 2008). Currently, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs<br />

(NSAIDs) are commonly used in the symptomatic treatment <strong>of</strong> inflammation (VIJI<br />

<strong>and</strong> HELEN, 2008). In fact, NSAIDs are reported to be among the most widely<br />

used drugs worldwide (FIORUCCI et al., 2001; STEINMEYER <strong>and</strong> KONTTINEN,<br />

2006). Nevertheless, the unwanted side effects such as gastric intolerance, water<br />

<strong>and</strong> electrolyte retention, bone marrow depression <strong>and</strong> cardiovascular risks<br />

associated with the use <strong>of</strong> these drugs (XIAO et al., 2005; STEINMEYER <strong>and</strong><br />

KONTTINEN, 2006) have necessitated further search for „classical‟ anti-<br />

inflammatory drugs with reduced or no side effects.<br />

Inflammation is a complex process involving the release <strong>of</strong> highly active pro-<br />

inflammatory mediators such as prostagl<strong>and</strong>ins, leukotrienes, histamine, cytokines<br />

<strong>and</strong> free radicals (ZSCHOCKE et al., 2000a). Prostagl<strong>and</strong>ins, such as PGE2,<br />

39


PGI2, PGF2α, are known to sensitize primary afferent nociceptive nerve fibers,<br />

which contributes to inflammatory pain (KONTTINEN et al., 1994). The release <strong>of</strong><br />

prostagl<strong>and</strong>ins from arachidonic acid is catalysed by the action <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme (also known as prostagl<strong>and</strong>in-H2-synthase, PGH2<br />

synthase) (STEINMEYER, 2000). The bi-functional COX enzyme catalyses the<br />

oxygenation <strong>of</strong> arachidonic acid (hydrolytically released from membrane<br />

phospholipids) to form the cyclic prostagl<strong>and</strong>in endoperoxide PGG2, followed by a<br />

peroxidase reaction which results in the formation <strong>of</strong> PGH2 (FRÖLICH, 1997;<br />

STEINMEYER, 2000). PGH2 is the precursor <strong>of</strong> other bioactive prostagl<strong>and</strong>ins <strong>and</strong><br />

thromboxanes (STEINMEYER, 2000). NSAIDs are known to inhibit the production<br />

<strong>of</strong> prostagl<strong>and</strong>ins mainly by inhibiting COX activity (VANE, 1994).<br />

The COX enzyme is known to exist mainly in two is<strong>of</strong>orms (COX-1 <strong>and</strong> COX-2),<br />

although the possible existence <strong>of</strong> a third is<strong>of</strong>orm (COX-3) has been hypothesized<br />

(BERENBAUM, 2004). The COX-1 <strong>and</strong> COX-2 isoenzymes are said to have<br />

approximately 60% homology in their nucleic acid <strong>and</strong> amino acid structures<br />

(VANE, 1994). COX-1 is identified to be constitutively expressed in most tissues<br />

with prostagl<strong>and</strong>in synthesis for maintaining some physiological functions such as<br />

gastric mucosa protection <strong>and</strong> renal perfusion maintenance (LI et al., 2006). On<br />

the other h<strong>and</strong>, COX-2 was thought to be induced only under pathological<br />

conditions <strong>and</strong> thus is solely responsible for the production <strong>of</strong> inflammatory<br />

prostanoid mediators (STEINMEYER <strong>and</strong> KONTTINEN, 2006). This concept led<br />

many researchers to start focussing on selective COX-2 inhibitors. However,<br />

recent published studies have shown that COX-2 is also constitutively expressed<br />

in some body parts such as the brain, spinal cord, kidney <strong>and</strong> uterus<br />

(STEINMEYER <strong>and</strong> KONTTINEN, 2006). As illustrated in Figure 2.3, COX-2<br />

is<strong>of</strong>orm has both physiological <strong>and</strong> pathophysiological roles. Furthermore, the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> some selective COX-2 inhibitors have been reported to carry a risk <strong>of</strong> gastro-<br />

intestinal toxicity in some patients (MACAULAY <strong>and</strong> BLACKBURN, 2002;<br />

BERTIN, 2004; WARNER <strong>and</strong> MITCHELL, 2008). STEINMEYER <strong>and</strong><br />

KONTTINEN (2006) further stated some undesirable side effects such as water<br />

<strong>and</strong> electrolyte retention, delayed wound healing (in animal experiments) <strong>and</strong><br />

cardiovascular risks reported with the use <strong>of</strong> selective COX-2 inhibitors. According<br />

to these authors, several selective COX-2 inhibitors have already been withdrawn<br />

40


from the market due to their cardiovascular risk <strong>and</strong> at present, all COX-2 selective<br />

NSAIDs are surmised to be likely causing heart attacks, strokes <strong>and</strong> thromboses.<br />

They therefore recommended the classical combination <strong>of</strong> a non-selective NSAID<br />

with a proton pump inhibitor (such as omeprazol) or misoprostol as a viable, low-<br />

cost alternative to COX-2 selective NSAIDs in the prophylaxis <strong>of</strong> the NSAID-<br />

gastropathy.<br />

On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the inhibition <strong>of</strong> COX enzyme is known to up-regulate the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> leukotrienes (LTs) from arachidonic acid through the 5-lipoxygenase<br />

(LOX) enzyme pathway (FIORUCCI et al., 2001). Leukotrienes are involved in the<br />

pathophysiology <strong>of</strong> chronic inflammation <strong>and</strong> allergic diseases such as rheumatoid<br />

arthritis, asthma as well as skin diseases like psoriasis (ZSCHOCKE et al.,<br />

2000a). The leukotriene LTB4, in particular, has been reported to have a<br />

pathophysiological function in the development <strong>of</strong> gastrointestinal ulcers (ASAKO<br />

et al., 1992; cited by FIORUCCI et al., 2001). Many authors have therefore<br />

suggested that the use <strong>of</strong> compounds that are dual inhibitors <strong>of</strong> COX <strong>and</strong> LOX<br />

enzymes could enhance anti-inflammatory effects with reduced undesirable side<br />

effects (ZSCHOCKE et al., 2000a; FIORUCCI et al., 2001; LI et al., 2006; VIJI<br />

<strong>and</strong> HELEN, 2008). These authors were <strong>of</strong> the opinion that dual inhibitors <strong>of</strong> COX<br />

<strong>and</strong> LOX enzymes could be a potential viable alternative to st<strong>and</strong>ard NSAIDs <strong>and</strong><br />

selective COX-2 inhibitors.<br />

Figure 2.3: The physiological <strong>and</strong> pathophysiological functions <strong>of</strong> COX-2<br />

enzyme (STEINMEYER, 2000).<br />

41


Many researchers have reported anti-inflammatory activity in plant extracts using<br />

different in vivo animal models in their evaluation. SINGH et al. (2003)<br />

demonstrated the anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> the n-butanol <strong>and</strong> aqueous fractions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the whole B. prionitis plant against carrageenan-induced oedema in rats.<br />

WANIKIAT et al. (2008) reported the anti-inflammatory effect <strong>of</strong> B. lupulina<br />

methanolic extract in carrageenan-induced paw oedema <strong>and</strong> ethyl<br />

phenylpropiolate-induced ear oedema in rats. However, according to TALHOUK<br />

et al. (2007), studies reporting anti-inflammatory activities <strong>of</strong> crude plant extracts<br />

in whole animal models demonstrate gross anti-inflammatory activities but typically<br />

fall short <strong>of</strong> identifying possible intracellular targets. Some <strong>of</strong> the common key<br />

molecules at the cellular level in the inflammatory cascade that are targeted by<br />

plant extracts include nuclear factor-κB, cytokines <strong>and</strong> COX (TALHOUK et al.,<br />

2007). Assays involving enzymes are generally known to be highly specific, very<br />

sensitive <strong>and</strong> mechanism-based, <strong>and</strong> they are valuable in screening large<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> samples as they are relatively easy <strong>and</strong> small amounts <strong>of</strong> material are<br />

required (HOSTETTMANN <strong>and</strong> MARSTON, 2002).<br />

2.2.4 Acetylcholinesterase inhibition<br />

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is an enzyme involved in the hydrolysis <strong>of</strong><br />

acetylcholine into a choline <strong>and</strong> acetyl group (DOHI et al., 2009). Acetylcholine is<br />

a neurotransmitter at all preganglionic autonomic, parasympathetic <strong>and</strong> some<br />

sympathetic postganglionic nerve endings, neuromuscular junctions <strong>and</strong> at some<br />

central nervous system (CNS) synapses (KOSMULALAGE et al., 2007).<br />

Neurotransmitter disturbances <strong>and</strong> low cholinergic function are among the<br />

pathological features involved in CNS disorders (HOWES <strong>and</strong> HOUGHTON,<br />

2003). The inhibition <strong>of</strong> the AChE enzyme, leading to the maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />

acetylcholine level <strong>and</strong> enhanced cholinergic function has become the st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

approach in the symptomatic treatment <strong>of</strong> Alzheimer‟s disease (AD) (HOWES <strong>and</strong><br />

HOUGHTON, 2003; VINUTHA et al., 2007). AD is the most common type <strong>of</strong><br />

neurodegenerative disease, characterized primarily by impaired memory <strong>and</strong><br />

cognitive dysfunction, <strong>and</strong> at advanced stages, language deficit, depression,<br />

agitation, mood disturbances <strong>and</strong> psychosis (HOUGHTON et al., 2007). The<br />

undesirable side effects such as hepatotoxicity in the therapeutic use <strong>of</strong> some<br />

42


AChE inhibitors (like tacrine) coupled with their limitation to symptom alleviation<br />

has necessitated further search for more potent drugs (LÓPEZ et al., 2002;<br />

HOWES <strong>and</strong> HOUGHTON, 2003; FERREIRA et al., 2006).<br />

KOSMULALAGE et al. (2007) recently reported moderate AChE inhibitory<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> four compounds isolated from ethanolic extract <strong>of</strong> B. prionitis. These<br />

compounds were identified to be balarenone, pipataline, lupeol <strong>and</strong> 13,14-seco-<br />

stigmasta-5,14-diene-3-α-ol. They also reported a significant AChE inhibitory<br />

activity with an IC50 value <strong>of</strong> 36.8 µM in the compound 8-amino-7-<br />

hydroxypipataline, a synthetic derivative <strong>of</strong> pipataline. ATA et al. (2009) reported<br />

the isolation <strong>of</strong> a new phenylethanoid glycoside (barlerinoside) along with six<br />

known iridoid glycosides (shanzhiside methyl ester, 6-O-trans-p-coumaroyl-8-O-<br />

acetylshanzhiside methyl ester, barlerin, acetylbarlerin, 7-methoxydiderroside <strong>and</strong><br />

lupulinoside) from the ethanolic extract <strong>of</strong> B. prionitis aerial parts. These<br />

compounds were reported to exhibit weak AChE inhibitory activities with IC50<br />

values <strong>of</strong> 175.9, 133.5, 150.0, 100.0, 145.8, 190.0 <strong>and</strong> 178.9 µM, respectively. The<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> a synergistic AChE inhibition <strong>of</strong> two or more <strong>of</strong> these compounds<br />

cannot be completely ruled out. Synergistic interaction was reported to be<br />

responsible for stronger AChE inhibition in Salvia lav<strong>and</strong>ulaefolia essential oil<br />

compared with that <strong>of</strong> its constituent terpenes (SAVELEV et al., 2003). The<br />

authors also reported both synergistic <strong>and</strong> antagonistic responses in some<br />

combinations <strong>of</strong> this plant terpene constituent. Taken together however, the<br />

reported results on B. prionitis perhaps suggest the possibility <strong>of</strong> discovering<br />

potential effective AChE inhibitors or leads from <strong>Barleria</strong> species. At present, there<br />

is no report available on the AChE inhibitory activities <strong>of</strong> the individual plant parts<br />

<strong>of</strong> B. prionitis <strong>and</strong> other <strong>Barleria</strong> species.<br />

2.2.5 Antioxidant activity<br />

Free radical reactions have been implicated in the pathology <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong><br />

disease states such as cancer, AD, diabetes, inflammation <strong>and</strong> several<br />

cardiovascular diseases (HOUGHTON et al., 2007). According to HOUGHTON<br />

<strong>and</strong> HOWES (2003), the use <strong>of</strong> antioxidants has been shown to slow AD<br />

progression <strong>and</strong> neuronal degeneration. HOUGHTON et al. (2007) suggested the<br />

43


inclusion <strong>of</strong> antioxidant <strong>and</strong> free radical scavenging tests, among others, in the<br />

biological screening <strong>of</strong> plants used for wound healing. This is due to the fact that<br />

the wound healing process is impaired by microbial infection <strong>and</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong><br />

cells <strong>and</strong> tissues by reactive oxygen species (ROS) (HOUGHTON et al., 2007;<br />

PATTANAYAK <strong>and</strong> SUNITA, 2008). ROS can damage cellular components <strong>and</strong><br />

act as secondary messengers in the inflammation process (FERREIRA et al.,<br />

2006). Antioxidants however, have the ability to scavenge ROS, attenuate<br />

inflammation pathways, reduce cancer, heart disease <strong>and</strong> other degenerative<br />

problems associated with aging (HENRY et al., 2002; FERREIRA et al., 2006).<br />

The realization <strong>of</strong> antioxidant roles in the management <strong>of</strong> some disease states has<br />

led to the inclusion <strong>of</strong> antioxidant tests in many pharmacological screenings <strong>of</strong><br />

plant extracts <strong>and</strong> isolated compounds. According to HUANG et al. (2005), the<br />

major antioxidant assays can be divided into two categories, based on the<br />

chemical reactions involved. These two categories are (i) hydrogen atom transfer<br />

(HAT) reaction based assays <strong>and</strong> (ii) single electron transfer (ET) reaction based<br />

assays. In the HAT based assays, a synthetic free radical generator, an oxidizable<br />

molecular probe <strong>and</strong> an antioxidant are generally involved, <strong>and</strong> the assays<br />

measure the competitive kinetics <strong>of</strong> the reaction (HUANG et al., 2005). The ET<br />

based assays measure the antioxidant capacity <strong>of</strong> an extract or a compound in the<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> an oxidant, a probe indicating the reaction endpoint (HUANG et al.,<br />

2005). Some examples <strong>of</strong> HAT based assays include inhibition <strong>of</strong> linoleic acid<br />

oxidation, ORAC (oxygen radical absorbance capacity) <strong>and</strong> Crocin bleaching<br />

assays while the ET based assays include FRAP (ferric ion reducing power<br />

assay), DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) <strong>and</strong> TEAC (Trolox equivalent<br />

antioxidant capacity) assays (HUANG et al., 2005). The use <strong>of</strong> the DPPH assay in<br />

antioxidant screening is very common due to its simplicity <strong>and</strong> reproducibility<br />

(KATSUBE et al., 2004). Nevertheless, due to the fact that antioxidant processes<br />

are complex, the use <strong>of</strong> at least two different types <strong>of</strong> assays in antioxidant activity<br />

study has been recommended (MOON <strong>and</strong> SHIBAMOTO, 2009). These authors<br />

recommended the combination <strong>of</strong> assays for scavenging electrons or radicals with<br />

assays associated with lipid peroxidations.<br />

44


2.2.6 Phytochemical property<br />

Plants <strong>of</strong>ten contain secondary metabolites, many <strong>of</strong> which are known to<br />

demonstrate good biological activity in pharmacological screening. The common<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> secondary metabolites in plants include the phenolics, terpenes <strong>and</strong><br />

alkaloids. Phenolic compounds are a class <strong>of</strong> secondary metabolites generally<br />

having an aromatic ring with one or more hydroxyl substituents (ROBARDS et al.,<br />

1999). ROBARDS et al. (1999) defined phenolics based on their metabolic origin<br />

as substances derived from the shikimate pathway <strong>and</strong> phenylpropanoid<br />

metabolism. They are extremely diverse both in their structures <strong>and</strong> functions<br />

(POLYA et al., 2003). The presence <strong>of</strong> -OH groups in the phenolic ring system<br />

allows for the polarity <strong>and</strong> water-solubility <strong>of</strong> phenolic compounds as well as their<br />

capacity for hydrogen bonding (POLYA, 2003). The capacity <strong>of</strong> the phenolic group<br />

to be deprotonated <strong>and</strong> oxidised explains their biologically important antioxidant<br />

<strong>properties</strong> (POLYA, 2003). Through covalent reaction with free radicals, especially<br />

the ROS, many phenolics can serve as good anti-inflammatory <strong>and</strong> antioxidant<br />

agents (POLYA, 2003). Some common phenolics in plants include tannins<br />

(hydrolysable tannins <strong>and</strong> condensed tannins) <strong>and</strong> flavonoids (the most<br />

widespread <strong>and</strong> diverse <strong>of</strong> the phenolics) (ROBARDS et al., 1999; POLYA,<br />

2003).<br />

Tannins are widely distributed defensive compounds in plants (POLYA, 2003).<br />

According to NIEMETZ <strong>and</strong> GROSS (2005), they are commonly classified into two<br />

categories: (i) condensed tannins (also known as proanthocyanidins), <strong>and</strong> (ii)<br />

hydrolysable tannins. Condensed tannins are essentially <strong>of</strong> flavonoid origin while<br />

hydrolysable tannins are further divided into two subclasses: (i) gallotannins, which<br />

involve a glucose esterified to gallic acid, <strong>and</strong> (ii) ellagitannins, which are ellagic<br />

acid-derived hexahydroxydiphenic acid (POLYA, 2003). The distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

gallotannins is rather limited in nature while ellagitannins are commonly found in<br />

many plant families (NIEMETZ <strong>and</strong> GROSS, 2005). OKUDA (2005) stated that<br />

the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> hydrolysable tannin in a plant species is generally stable throughout<br />

the year. AKIYAMA et al. (2001) reported the antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> several<br />

tannins against 18 strains <strong>of</strong> S. aureus, including 11 strains that are methicillin-<br />

resistant. ENGELS et al. (2009) <strong>and</strong> TIAN et al. (2009a, b) observed antimicrobial<br />

45


activity <strong>of</strong> gallotannins from Mangifera indica <strong>and</strong> Galla chinensis, respectively.<br />

The antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> hydrolysable tannins have been linked to (i) their<br />

ability to interact with proteins <strong>and</strong> inhibit enzyme activities, (ii) the damage <strong>of</strong> lipid<br />

bilayer membranes as demonstrated in Helicobacter pylori, <strong>and</strong> (iii) their ability to<br />

complex metal ions (such as iron) (ENGELS et al., 2009). Furthermore, OKUDA<br />

(2005) stated that tannins are generally not mutagenic (based on Ames‟ test), but<br />

instead, they showed antimutagenic activity against certain mutagens. Their<br />

radical scavenging ability as well as the inhibition <strong>of</strong> lipid peroxidation <strong>and</strong> enzyme<br />

activities (such as LOX) are said to be the activities underlying the antioxidant <strong>and</strong><br />

anti-inflammatory effects <strong>of</strong> tannins (OKUDA, 2005).<br />

Flavonoids are well characterized in plant extracts as the main compounds<br />

possessing anti-inflammatory activity (TALHOUK et al., 2007). They inhibit a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> molecules such as nuclear factor-кB (NF-кB), inducible nitric oxide<br />

synthase (iNOS), cytokines, COX, LOX <strong>and</strong> matrix metalloproteinases (TALHOUK<br />

et al., 2007). CHI et al. (2001) reported various degrees <strong>of</strong> inhibition <strong>of</strong> COX-1,<br />

COX-2, 5-LOX <strong>and</strong>/or 12-LOX by 19 naturally occurring flavonoids isolated from<br />

<strong>medicinal</strong> plants. TUNALIER et al. (2007) reported both antioxidant <strong>and</strong> anti-<br />

inflammatory activities in flavonoid rich polar extracts <strong>of</strong> Lythrum salicaria.<br />

PATTANAYAK <strong>and</strong> SUNITA (2008) observed antibacterial <strong>and</strong> antifungal<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> Dendrophthoe falcata flavonoid-containing extracts, using 12 <strong>and</strong> 5<br />

different bacterial <strong>and</strong> fungal strains, respectively. They concluded that the marked<br />

activity recorded was due to the presence <strong>of</strong> flavonoids <strong>and</strong> terpenes in the<br />

extracts.<br />

Many authors have reported the isolation <strong>of</strong> iridoids in some <strong>Barleria</strong> species. ATA<br />

et al. (2009) reported the isolation <strong>of</strong> seven iridoids from the aerial parts <strong>of</strong> B.<br />

prionitis, with different levels <strong>of</strong> biological activity in glutathione S-transferase<br />

(GST) inhibition, AChE inhibition <strong>and</strong> free radical scavenging assays. CHEN et al.<br />

(1998) reported the isolation <strong>of</strong> some iridoids from B. prionitis with antiviral potency<br />

against the respiratory syncytial virus. SINGH et al. (2004) observed a significant<br />

<strong>and</strong> concentration-dependent hepatoprotective potential <strong>of</strong> the iridoid enriched<br />

fraction from B. prionitis extract. The isolation <strong>and</strong> characterization <strong>of</strong> iridoids have<br />

also been reported in other <strong>Barleria</strong> species such as B. strigosa<br />

46


(KANCHANAPOOM et al., 2004) <strong>and</strong> B. lupulina (KANCHANAPOOM et al.,<br />

2001). The anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> some plant extracts has been attributed to<br />

the presence <strong>of</strong> iridoids (LEVIEILLE <strong>and</strong> WILSON, 2002). BOLZANI et al. (1997)<br />

have reported the antifungal property <strong>of</strong> certain iridoids such as gardiols. Iridoids<br />

generally are monoterpenes deriving biosynthetically from geranylpyrophosphate<br />

<strong>and</strong> can be found in free or glycoside form in plant extracts (POLYA, 2003).<br />

47


3.1 Introduction<br />

Chapter 3 In vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong><br />

The application <strong>of</strong> tissue culture techniques in the propagation <strong>of</strong> ornamental<br />

plants has recorded a big stride in recent years <strong>and</strong> has become widely accepted<br />

as a st<strong>and</strong>ard practice in the horticultural industry (READ <strong>and</strong> PREECE, 2009). At<br />

present, more than one billion traded ornamental plants are reportedly produced<br />

through tissue culture (PRAKASH, 2009). A large percentage <strong>of</strong> this figure<br />

focuses on cut flowers <strong>and</strong> pot plants whereas ornamental perennials <strong>and</strong> garden<br />

plants account for only 2% <strong>of</strong> the total ornamental plants produced through tissue<br />

culture (PRAKASH, 2009). It has been estimated that the global trade <strong>of</strong><br />

ornamental perennials alone is about 8 billion US dollars per year compared to 90<br />

<strong>and</strong> 60 billion US dollars for cut flower <strong>and</strong> pot plants, respectively (PRAKASH,<br />

2009). There is indeed a great need as well as a great potential for the application<br />

<strong>of</strong> tissue culture techniques in propagating ornamental perennials <strong>and</strong> garden<br />

plants.<br />

The major challenges or setback in the application <strong>of</strong> tissue culture techniques to<br />

ornamental perennials <strong>and</strong> garden plants include the recalcitrant nature <strong>of</strong> plant<br />

tissues, <strong>of</strong>ten related to seasonal dormancy, establishment <strong>of</strong> clean explants, slow<br />

multiplication rate, poor rooting frequency, morphological aberrations <strong>and</strong> high<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> production (PRAKASH, 2009). The choice <strong>of</strong> plant growth regulators has<br />

however been reported to play a crucial role in solving or alleviating most <strong>of</strong> these<br />

problems (WERBROUCK et al., 1995, 1996; BAIRU et al., 2007, 2008, 2009).<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> topolins, for example, has been reported to increase shoot<br />

multiplication, maintain histogenic stability, improve rooting efficiency <strong>and</strong><br />

subsequently reduce the production cost (KUBALÁKOVÁ <strong>and</strong> STRNAD, 1992;<br />

WERBROUCK et al., 1996; BOGAERT et al., 2006). It is therefore important that<br />

the choice <strong>of</strong> appropriate plant growth regulators, amongst others, be given close<br />

attention when developing micropropagation protocols especially suitable for<br />

commercial application.<br />

48


<strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong> (Family: Acanthaceae) is a perennial ornamental shrub, endemic<br />

to a specific area in the KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa. SCOTT-SHAW<br />

(1999) described it as a successful garden plant with horticultural potential. This<br />

plant species was discovered in 1984 (BALKWILL et al., 1990) <strong>and</strong> is known to<br />

be found only in eight localities on three farms near Estcourt, South Africa<br />

(MAKHOLELA et al., 2003). It is currently listed in the National Red List <strong>of</strong> South<br />

African plants as critically endangered (SANBI, 2009). <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong> can be<br />

grown from seed as well as from cuttings. The propagation from seed is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

affected by low seed viability as a result <strong>of</strong> high seed parasitism. MAKHOLELA et<br />

al. (2003) observed that in instances where there might have been successful<br />

pollination <strong>and</strong> seed production, survival <strong>of</strong> the seed into the next generation is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten prohibited by seed parasites, resulting in a highly reduced number <strong>of</strong> viable<br />

seeds. SCOTT-SHAW (1999) therefore suggested that where viable seeds are not<br />

available, propagation by cuttings, although difficult, is the best option.<br />

This study was aimed at developing an effective micropropagation protocol, which<br />

can potentially provide a conservation measure for this endangered plant species.<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> different cytokinins <strong>and</strong> photoperiods were also investigated in this<br />

study. As far as can be ascertained from the available literatures, there is no report<br />

to date on micropropagation <strong>of</strong> any <strong>Barleria</strong> species.<br />

3.2 Materials <strong>and</strong> methods<br />

3.2.1 Explant decontamination, selection <strong>and</strong> bulking<br />

Shoot-tip <strong>and</strong> nodal explants were excised from stock plants (Figure 3.1A)<br />

maintained in the shade house in the University <strong>of</strong> KwaZulu-Natal Botanical<br />

Garden. The explants were thoroughly rinsed under running tap water before they<br />

were subjected to surface decontamination treatments. The treatments involved<br />

soaking the plant materials in 70% ethanol for 60 sec followed by 3.0% sodium<br />

hypochlorite solution for 20 or 30 min, or 3.5% for 20 min. In each solution, a few<br />

drops <strong>of</strong> Tween 20 were added as a surfactant. The surface decontaminated<br />

explants were cut into 10 mm lengths <strong>and</strong> cultured individually on 10 ml (in culture<br />

tubes, 100 mm × 25 mm, 40 ml volume) <strong>of</strong> full strength MS medium supplemented<br />

49


with 30 g l -1 sucrose, 0.1 g l -1 myo-inositol, 3.0 µM BA <strong>and</strong> solidified with 8 g l -1<br />

agar (Bacteriological agar–Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, Engl<strong>and</strong>). The pH<br />

<strong>of</strong> the medium was adjusted to 5.7 with KOH or HCl before autoclaving at 121 o C<br />

<strong>and</strong> 103 kPa for 20 min. Cultures were incubated in a growth room with 16 h<br />

photoperiod <strong>and</strong> PPF <strong>of</strong> 60 µmol m -2 s -1 at 25 ± 2 o C. The frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

decontaminated surviving explants, expressed in percentage, in each<br />

decontamination treatment was recorded. Shoot-tip explants exhibited a high<br />

decontamination frequency <strong>and</strong> were therefore selected for all the subsequent<br />

experiments. Due to the low availability <strong>of</strong> explants as a result <strong>of</strong> dormancy<br />

imposed during the winter season, plant materials were bulked up by subculturing<br />

on the same medium using screw cap jars (110 mm × 60 mm, approximately 300<br />

ml volume). Shoot-tip explants obtained from these cultures were used in the next<br />

two experiments (sections 3.2.2 <strong>and</strong> 3.2.3)<br />

3.2.2 Effects <strong>of</strong> BA <strong>and</strong> NAA on shoot multiplication<br />

After bulking up sufficient plant material, an experiment investigating the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

BA with or without NAA supplementation on shoot multiplication was conducted<br />

using shoot-tip explants (5 mm length). Concentrations <strong>of</strong> 0.0, 0.5, <strong>and</strong> 1.0 µM <strong>of</strong><br />

NAA were combined with 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 <strong>and</strong> 5.0 µM BA in a 3 × 5 completely<br />

r<strong>and</strong>omised factorial design. MS medium without any plant growth regulator was<br />

included as a control. Three explants were cultured on 30 ml <strong>of</strong> medium contained<br />

in each screw cap jar, with a total replicate (observation unit) <strong>of</strong> twenty-seven<br />

explants per treatment. Cultures were incubated in a growth room with 16 h light/8<br />

h dark conditions <strong>and</strong> 60 µmol m -2 s -1 PPF at 25 ± 2 o C. The total number <strong>of</strong><br />

adventitious shoots produced per cultured explant, number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots<br />

greater than 10 mm in length, number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots 5 – 10 mm long, <strong>and</strong><br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> cultured explants producing shoots were recorded after four <strong>and</strong> six<br />

weeks <strong>of</strong> culture.<br />

3.2.3 Effects <strong>of</strong> types <strong>and</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> cytokinins on shoot multiplication<br />

Concentrations <strong>of</strong> 1.0, 3.0, 5.0 <strong>and</strong> 7.0 µM <strong>of</strong> different aromatic cytokinins (BA,<br />

Kinetin, mT, mTR, <strong>and</strong> MemTR) were used in a completely r<strong>and</strong>omised design.<br />

50


BA <strong>and</strong> Kinetin were purchased from SIGMA (USA) while mT, mTR, <strong>and</strong> MemTR<br />

were obtained from the Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Growth Regulators, Palacky University <strong>and</strong><br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Experimental Botany AS CR, Czech Republic. Three explants were<br />

cultured on 30 ml medium contained in each screw cap jar, with a total replicate<br />

(observation unit) <strong>of</strong> twenty-four explants per treatment. Cultures were incubated<br />

in a growth room with 16 h photoperiod <strong>and</strong> 60 µmol m -2 s -1 PPF at 25 ± 2 o C. The<br />

total number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots produced per cultured explant, number <strong>of</strong><br />

adventitious shoots greater than 10 mm in length, number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots 5<br />

– 10 mm long, <strong>and</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> cultured explants producing shoots were<br />

recorded after four <strong>and</strong> six weeks <strong>of</strong> culture. In addition, abnormality index,<br />

calculated as the ratio <strong>of</strong> abnormal (hyperhydric shoots <strong>and</strong> shoots with shoot-tip<br />

necrosis) to normal shoots (BAIRU et al., 2008), was recorded after six weeks <strong>of</strong><br />

culture.<br />

3.2.4 Effects <strong>of</strong> photoperiod on shoot multiplication<br />

Shoot-tip explants used for this experiment were excised from regenerated shoots<br />

in cultures containing MS medium supplemented with 7 µM MemTR. Based on the<br />

results obtained from the preceding experiment (section 3.2.3), three shoot-tip<br />

explants were cultured on 30 ml <strong>of</strong> MS medium supplemented with 7 µM MemTR<br />

in screw cap jar. The cultures were placed at 25°C under two different<br />

photoperiods: continuous light <strong>and</strong> 16 h light (60 µmol m -2 s -1 PPF in each case).<br />

Each treatment had a total <strong>of</strong> twenty-four replicates. The total number <strong>of</strong><br />

adventitious shoots produced per cultured explant, number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots<br />

greater than 10 mm in length, number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots 5 – 10 mm long, <strong>and</strong><br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> cultured explants producing shoots were recorded after six weeks <strong>of</strong><br />

culture.<br />

3.2.5 In vitro rooting <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots<br />

For in vitro rooting <strong>of</strong> individual regenerated shoots, shoot clusters produced in the<br />

shoot multiplication stage from each optimal cytokinin concentration were carefully<br />

separated <strong>and</strong> cultured on half-strength MS medium with or without 2.5 µM IBA<br />

supplementation, contained in screw cap jars. The cultures were completely<br />

51


<strong>and</strong>omised <strong>and</strong> maintained in a growth room at 25°C under a 16 h photoperiod<br />

(60 µmol m -2 s -1 PPF). After four weeks <strong>of</strong> culture, the number <strong>of</strong> roots produced<br />

per shoot, root length <strong>and</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> cultured shoots producing roots were<br />

recorded.<br />

3.2.6 Ex vitro rooting <strong>and</strong> acclimatization<br />

Regenerated shoots obtained from MS medium supplemented with 7 µM MemTR<br />

were used in this experiment. Ex vitro rooting <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots was<br />

investigated by pulsing regenerated shoots in different IBA concentrations for five<br />

hours in the light at 25°C. The IBA concentrations used were 10 -3 , 10 -4 , 10 -5 <strong>and</strong><br />

10 -6 M while distilled water served as the control. After pulsing, the shoots were<br />

potted in vermiculite <strong>and</strong> placed in a mist house with about 90% relative humidity<br />

for three weeks. The acclimatized plants were subsequently transferred to a<br />

greenhouse <strong>and</strong> the percentage <strong>of</strong> surviving plants was recorded in each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

treatments after another two weeks.<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> acclimatization, agar was carefully washed <strong>of</strong>f the in vitro<br />

rooted shoots (regenerated on medium with 7 µM MemTR) <strong>and</strong> the plants then<br />

potted in a mixture <strong>of</strong> s<strong>and</strong>:soil:vermiculite (1:1:1, v/v). The potted plants were<br />

maintained in the mist house for two weeks before being transferred to a<br />

greenhouse. The percentage <strong>of</strong> surviving plants was recorded after an additional<br />

two weeks.<br />

3.2.7 Data analyses<br />

Mean values <strong>of</strong> the various treatments were subjected, as appropriate, to either<br />

one way analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) or student‟s t-test using SPSS version 15.0<br />

or SigmaPlot 8.0, respectively. The significance level was determined at P = 0.05.<br />

Where there were significant differences, the means were separated using<br />

Duncan‟s Multiple Range Test (DMRT).<br />

52


3.3 Results <strong>and</strong> discussion<br />

Figure 3.1 shows the different stages involved in the successful micropropagation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong>. These include explant selection from the stock plant, culture<br />

initiation, adventitious shoot regeneration, rooting <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots <strong>and</strong> their<br />

acclimatization.<br />

Figure 3.1: In vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong>. (A) Stock plant. (B) Control<br />

(MS medium without PGR). (C) Shoot multiplication on MS medium<br />

supplemented with 3 µM BA. (D) Shoot multiplication on MS<br />

medium supplemented with 7 µM MemTR. (E) In vitro rooted<br />

regenerated shoot ready for acclimatization. (F) Three-month-old<br />

fully acclimatized plant. Bars = 10 mm.<br />

53


3.3.1 Explant decontamination<br />

Figure 3.2 shows the effects <strong>of</strong> different sodium hypochlorite solution treatments<br />

on decontamination <strong>of</strong> nodal <strong>and</strong> shoot-tip explants. The decontamination<br />

frequency recorded in the nodal explants was generally low, the highest being<br />

47% decontamination. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, shoot-tip explants treated with 3.0%<br />

NaOCl for 30 min <strong>and</strong> those treated with 3.5% NaOCl for 20 min showed high<br />

decontamination frequencies <strong>of</strong> 72 <strong>and</strong> 74%, respectively. The soaking <strong>of</strong> the<br />

shoot-tips in 70% ethanol for 60 sec followed by 3.5% for 20 min proved to be the<br />

best surface decontamination treatment.<br />

Frequency <strong>of</strong> decontamination (%)<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

3% NaOCl for 20 min<br />

3% NaOCl for 30 min<br />

3.5% NaOCl for 20 min<br />

Figure 3.2: Effects <strong>of</strong> sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution treatments on<br />

explants decontamination.<br />

Nodal Shoot-tip<br />

Explant type<br />

54


3.3.2 Effects <strong>of</strong> BA <strong>and</strong> NAA on shoot multiplication<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> different combinations <strong>of</strong> BA <strong>and</strong> NAA concentrations on<br />

adventitious shoot production after four <strong>and</strong> six weeks <strong>of</strong> culture are presented in<br />

Figures 3.3 <strong>and</strong> 3.4, respectively. The number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots produced per<br />

cultured explant, adventitious shoots with a length greater than 10 mm <strong>and</strong><br />

adventitious shoots 5 – 10 mm in length were higher in all the treatments,<br />

compared to the control. The treatments with BA alone showed higher adventitious<br />

shoot production when compared to the BA treatments supplemented with NAA<br />

concentrations. This trend was observed both after four <strong>and</strong> six weeks <strong>of</strong> culture.<br />

In cultures with BA alone, there was an increase in shoot production with<br />

increased BA concentration, reaching the optimum at 3 µM BA. At supra-optimal<br />

concentrations, there was a decrease in shoot production. At equimolar supra-<br />

optimal BA concentrations, an increase in NAA concentration generally gave a<br />

reduced shoot production. In a similar vein, the frequency <strong>of</strong> explants producing<br />

shoots was generally lower in cultures supplemented with NAA compared to<br />

cultures with BA alone. These results imply that the exogenous application <strong>of</strong> NAA<br />

is neither a requirement for adventitious shoot induction nor shoot proliferation<br />

from shoot-tip explant <strong>of</strong> this species. In fact, the addition <strong>of</strong> NAA tends to show an<br />

antagonistic effect on adventitious shoot production. Auxins are generally known<br />

to be produced in shoot-tips <strong>of</strong> plants, from where they are mainly transported<br />

basipetally. Hence, in this study, the endogenous auxin content in the excised<br />

shoot-tip explant appears sufficient for shoot induction <strong>and</strong> growth. A similar<br />

significant inhibition <strong>of</strong> NAA on shoot proliferation <strong>and</strong> growth was reported by<br />

NUNES et al. (2002) in Cedrela fissilis cultures. According to these authors, the<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> NAA to medium containing BA strengthened apical dominance at the<br />

expense <strong>of</strong> shoot proliferation. Furthermore, it is possible that the exogenous<br />

application <strong>of</strong> NAA in the current study down-regulated cytokinin levels by<br />

promoting BA metabolic inactivation through N-glucosylation (KAMĺNEK et al.,<br />

1997). The lowering effect <strong>of</strong> exogenous auxin application on active cytokinin<br />

levels has also been reported by other researchers (HANSEN et al., 1987;<br />

BEINSBERGER et al., 1991; ZAŽĺMALOVÁ et al., 1996).<br />

55


Adventitious shoots per explant<br />

(n)<br />

Adventitious shoots > 10 mm length<br />

(n)<br />

Adventitious shoots 5 - 10 mm length<br />

(n)<br />

Explants producing shoots<br />

(%)<br />

5.0<br />

4.0<br />

3.0<br />

2.0<br />

1.0<br />

0.0<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

g<br />

e<br />

d<br />

ab<br />

ab<br />

a<br />

a<br />

a<br />

a<br />

abc<br />

ab<br />

a<br />

abc<br />

ab<br />

abcd<br />

cdef<br />

bcd<br />

bcd<br />

defg<br />

def<br />

bcd<br />

cde<br />

efg<br />

cde<br />

cd<br />

bcd<br />

cd<br />

0.0 0.5 1.0<br />

NAA concentration (µM)<br />

Figure 3.3: Effects <strong>of</strong> BA <strong>and</strong> NAA on adventitious shoot production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

<strong>greenii</strong> after four weeks <strong>of</strong> culture. Bars with different letters are<br />

significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT.<br />

bcde<br />

bc<br />

cdef<br />

cde<br />

abcd<br />

abcd<br />

cdef<br />

cde<br />

abcd<br />

bcd<br />

bcd<br />

abc<br />

defg<br />

defg<br />

cde<br />

cde<br />

fg<br />

de<br />

bcd<br />

cd<br />

cd<br />

Control<br />

1.0 µM BA<br />

2.0 µM BA<br />

3.0 µM BA<br />

4.0 µM BA<br />

5.0 µM BA<br />

56


Adventitious shoots per explant<br />

(n)<br />

Adventitious shoots > 10 mm length<br />

(n)<br />

Adventitious shoots 5 - 10 mm length<br />

(n)<br />

Explants producing shoots<br />

(%)<br />

5.0<br />

4.0<br />

3.0<br />

2.0<br />

1.0<br />

0.0<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

e<br />

c<br />

d<br />

ab<br />

a<br />

abc<br />

a<br />

a<br />

a<br />

a<br />

ab<br />

a<br />

abc<br />

a<br />

abc<br />

cd<br />

b<br />

bcd<br />

de d<br />

b<br />

b<br />

0.0 0.5 1.0<br />

NAA concentration (µM)<br />

Figure 3.4: Effects <strong>of</strong> BA <strong>and</strong> NAA on adventitious shoot production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

<strong>greenii</strong> after six weeks <strong>of</strong> culture. Bars with different letters are<br />

significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT.<br />

de<br />

bc<br />

cd<br />

cd<br />

cd<br />

d<br />

d<br />

bc b<br />

bcd<br />

bcd<br />

cd<br />

b<br />

bcd<br />

bcd<br />

b<br />

abcd<br />

de<br />

de<br />

bc<br />

bc<br />

de<br />

bc<br />

bcd<br />

bcd<br />

bcd<br />

Control<br />

1.0 µM BA<br />

2.0 µM BA<br />

3.0 µM BA<br />

4.0 µM BA<br />

5.0 µM BA<br />

57


3.3.3 Effects <strong>of</strong> types <strong>and</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> cytokinins on shoot multiplication<br />

Table 3.1 shows the effects <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>and</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> aromatic<br />

cytokinins on adventitious shoot production. The lowest <strong>and</strong> highest adventitious<br />

shoot production were observed in the control (Figure 3.1B) <strong>and</strong> the treatment with<br />

7 µM MemTR (Figure 3.1D) respectively, both after four <strong>and</strong> six weeks <strong>of</strong> culture.<br />

With the exception <strong>of</strong> BA treatments, an increase in concentration generally<br />

resulted in an increase in adventitious shoots produced per cultured explant as<br />

well as in adventitious shoots with a length greater than 10 mm. All the kinetin<br />

concentrations (including the highest concentration tested) gave a comparatively<br />

low adventitious shoot production, which was not significantly different from the<br />

control. This indicates that kinetin is a relatively weak cytokinin (especially when<br />

compared with BA), perhaps requiring a much higher concentration to achieve a<br />

significant shoot production in this species. The low effectiveness <strong>of</strong> kinetin in<br />

producing a high shoot proliferation compared to BA has also been reported in<br />

Cross<strong>and</strong>ra infundibuliformis (another Acanthaceae species) <strong>and</strong> Citrullus lanatus<br />

by GIRIJA et al. (1999) <strong>and</strong> COMPTON et al. (1993), respectively. Nevertheless,<br />

BOGAERT et al. (2006) observed that kinetin (a weak cytokinin) is useful in slowly<br />

<strong>and</strong> safely micropropagating some valuable ornamentals such as chimeras,<br />

without compromising their histogenic stability.<br />

The plant growth regulator, BA is reported to be among the most effective <strong>and</strong><br />

affordable cytokinins widely used in micropropagation techniques (BAIRU et al.,<br />

2007). The optimum BA concentration for adventitious shoot production was<br />

reached in the current study at 3 µM (Figure 3.1C; Table 3.1). The abnormality<br />

index recorded at this concentration was higher than the abnormality index<br />

recorded in all concentrations <strong>of</strong> cytokinins (except 5 µM Kinetin, 1 µM BA <strong>and</strong><br />

supra-optimal BA concentrations) used in this study. At supra-optimal BA<br />

concentrations, adventitious shoot production decreased while the abnormality<br />

index increased considerably. This response possibly reflects the toxic nature <strong>of</strong><br />

BA in this species. Similar observations with respect to BA toxicity have been<br />

reported by many researchers for different plant species (KUBALÁKOVÁ <strong>and</strong><br />

STRNAD, 1992; BOGAERT et al., 2006; BAIRU et al., 2007, 2008, 2009). This<br />

toxicity is <strong>of</strong>ten attributed to the more stable nature <strong>of</strong> BA <strong>and</strong> its metabolites such<br />

58


as [9G]BA compared to other cytokinins. DOLEŽAL et al. (2006) however,<br />

reported that growth inhibition by excessive cytokinin concentrations in tobacco<br />

callus is at least partly due to the cytokinin inhibition <strong>of</strong> cyclin-dependent kinase<br />

activity. Nevertheless, some recent investigations have focussed on evaluating<br />

other cytokinins (mainly the aromatic ones) with a view to finding a replacement for<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> BA in the micropropagation industry. Such replacement would be<br />

expected, among other things, to essentially improve multiplication frequency<br />

while maintaining genetic stability <strong>of</strong> regenerated plants.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> mT <strong>and</strong> its derivatives has been advocated by some researchers<br />

(WERBROUCK et al., 1996; BOGAERT et al., 2006; BAIRU et al., 2007) as a<br />

potential replacement for BA in the micropropagation industry. Some <strong>of</strong> these<br />

topolins were evaluated in this study. Unlike in BA treatments, an increase in<br />

adventitious shoot production per cultured explant <strong>and</strong> adventitious shoots with<br />

length greater than 10 mm was generally observed with an increase in the<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> the topolins evaluated (Table 3.1). It is particularly noteworthy that<br />

the abnormality index recorded in all the topolin treatments (including the higher<br />

concentrations evaluated) was much lower than the abnormality index recorded at<br />

the lowest BA concentration. These findings indicate the effectiveness <strong>and</strong> less<br />

toxic nature <strong>of</strong> these topolins at higher equimolar concentrations compared to BA.<br />

Some factors responsible for the superiority <strong>of</strong> meta-topolins over BA have been<br />

discussed by some researchers. As stated by KAMĺNEK et al. (1987b), the<br />

localised accumulation <strong>of</strong> mT is prevented by its faster translocation in plant<br />

tissues. The metabolites <strong>of</strong> mT <strong>and</strong> mTR are said to be easily degradable (BAIRU<br />

et al., 2009). The hydroxyl group in the side chain <strong>of</strong> meta-topolins makes possible<br />

the formation <strong>of</strong> O-glucoside metabolites (WERBROUCK et al., 1996). The O-<br />

glucosides are considered to be cytokinin storage forms, stable under certain<br />

conditions but rapidly converted to active cytokinin bases when required<br />

(PARKER et al., 1978; WERBROUCK et al., 1996). The reversible sequestration<br />

<strong>of</strong> the O-glucosides in turn, allows for the continuous availability <strong>of</strong> cytokinins at a<br />

physiologically active level over a prolonged period <strong>of</strong> time, resulting in high shoot<br />

formation in in vitro cultures (STRNAD, 1997).<br />

59


Table 3.1: Effects <strong>of</strong> types <strong>and</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> cytokinins on adventitious shoot production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong><br />

Cytokinin<br />

(µM)<br />

4 th Week <strong>of</strong> culture 6 th Week <strong>of</strong> culture<br />

Adventitious Adventitious shoots (n) Explants<br />

shoots/explant<br />

(n)<br />

5 – 10 mm<br />

length > 10 mm length<br />

Control 0.92 ± 0.06 h 0.42 ± 0.10 cd 0.50 ± 0.10 h 92<br />

1 BA 2.46 ± 0.24 cdef 0.79 ± 0.17 bcd 1.67 ± 0.27 cdefg 100<br />

3 BA 3.04 ± 0.50 bc 1.21 ± 0.27 b 1.83 ± 0.38 bcde 96<br />

5 BA 2.83 ± 0.27 bcd 1.04 ± 0.19 bc 1.79 ± 0.26 bcdef 100<br />

7 BA 2.13 ± 0.24 cdefg 0.71 ± 0.20 bcd 1.42 ± 0.18 defg 100<br />

1 Kin 1.00 ± 0.06 h 0.46 ± 0.10 cd 0.54 ± 0.10 h 96<br />

3 Kin 1.17 ± 0.13 gh 0.58 ± 0.17 bcd 0.58 ± 0.10 h 92<br />

5 Kin 1.25 ± 0.12 gh 0.38 ± 0.12 d 0.88 ± 0.14 gh 96<br />

7 Kin 1.58 ± 0.20 fgh 0.63 ± 0.18 bcd 0.96 ± 0.17 fgh 96<br />

1 mT 1.67 ± 0.21 efgh 0.21 ± 0.10 d 1.46 ± 0.19 defg 100<br />

3 mT 2.67 ± 0.34 bcde 0.46 ± 0.18 cd 2.21 ± 0.23 bcd 100<br />

5 mT 2.71 ± 0.30 bcde 0.46 ± 0.19 cd 2.25 ± 0.26 bcd 100<br />

7 mT 2.83 ± 0.45 bcd 0.75 ± 0.24 bcd 2.08 ± 0.31 bcde 96<br />

1 mTR 1.21 ± 0.15 gh 0.25 ± 0.09 d 0.96 ± 0.14 fgh 88<br />

3 mTR 1.90 ± 0.23 defgh 0.29 ± 0.12 d 1.62 ± 0.22 cdefg 100<br />

5 mTR 3.17 ± 0.45 bc 0.71 ± 0.19 bcd 2.46 ± 0.35 bc 100<br />

7 mTR 2.46 ± 0.26 cdef 0.46 ± 0.15 cd 2.00 ± 0.26 bcde 100<br />

1 MemTR 1.42 ± 0.22 fgh 0.17 ± 0.08 d 1.25 ± 0.24 efgh 100<br />

3 MemTR 3.08 ± 0.61 bc 1.04 ± 0.36 bc 2.08 ± 0.39 bcde 100<br />

5 MemTR 3.63 ± 0.43 b 1.04 ± 0.20 bc 2.58 ± 0.38 ab 100<br />

producing<br />

shoots (%)<br />

Adventitious Adventitious shoots (n) Explants Abnormality<br />

shoots/explant (n)<br />

5 – 10 mm<br />

length > 10 mm length<br />

producing<br />

shoots (%) index (x 10 -1 )<br />

0.96 ± 0.07 g 0.33 ± 0.12 de 0.63 ± 0.10 h 92 0.45<br />

2.79 ± 0.30 bcde 0.92 ± 0.16 bcd 1.88 ± 0.29 cdef 100 1.55<br />

3.79 ± 0.62 b 1.38 ± 0.25 ab 2.42 ± 0.48 bcd 96 1.52<br />

3.13 ± 0.28 bc 1.17 ± 0.21 bc 1.96 ± 0.27 cdef 100 4.42<br />

2.33 ± 0.29 cdef 0.79 ± 0.20 bcde 1.54 ± 0.26 defgh 100 4.36<br />

1.04 ± 0.07 g 0.33 ± 0.10 de 0.71 ± 0.09 h 96 0.87<br />

1.17 ± 0.10 fg 0.54 ± 0.13 cde 0.63 ± 0.10h 96 0.38<br />

1.25 ± 0.09 fg 0.38 ± 0.10 de 0.88 ± 0.13 gh 100 1.54<br />

1.63 ± 0.18 efg 0.58 ± 0.15 cde 1.04 ± 0.11 fgh 100 0.26<br />

1.67 ± 0.21 efg 0.21 ± 0.10 e 1.46 ± 0.19 efgh 100 0.86<br />

2.96 ± 0.44 bcd 0.58 ± 0.21 cde 2.38 ± 0.31 bcd 100 0.29<br />

3.08 ± 0.36 bcd 0.58 ± 0.20 cde 2.50 ± 0.28 bc 100 0.72<br />

3.08 ± 0.48 bcd 0.67 ± 0.23 cde 2.42 ± 0.36 bcd 96 0.72<br />

1.42 ± 0.16 fg 0.33 ± 0.12 de 1.08 ± 0.16 fgh 92 0<br />

1.90 ± 0.21 defg 0.19 ± 0.09 e 1.71 ± 0.22 defg 100 0.53<br />

3.71 ± 0.56 b 0.75 ± 0.22 cde 2.96 ± 0.42 b 100 0.23<br />

2.92 ± 0.30 bcd 0.63 ± 0.13 cde 2.29 ± 0.27 bcd 100 0.29<br />

1.46 ± 0.26 fg 0.21 ± 0.08 e 1.25 ± 0.28 fgh 100 0.29<br />

3.38 ± 0.67 bc 1.13 ± 0.31 bc 2.25 ± 0.41 bcd 100 0<br />

3.88 ± 0.50 b 1.13 ± 0.28 bc 2.75 ± 0.42 bc 100 0.33<br />

7 MemTR 5.04 ± 0.62 a 1.75 ± 0.32 a 3.29 ± 0.43 a 100 5.88 ± 0.73 a 1.88 ± 0.31 a 4.00 ± 0.53 a 100 0.37<br />

Means within the same column followed by different letter(s) are significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT.<br />

60


Furthermore, BOGAERT et al. (2006) reported the histogenic stability <strong>and</strong> anti-<br />

senescing activity <strong>of</strong> MemTR in Petunia hybrida <strong>and</strong> Rosa hybrida cultures<br />

respectively. BAIRU (2008) reported increased callus yield with MemTR > mTR ><br />

mT in the soybean callus bioassay. In the current study, cultures containing 7 µM<br />

MemTR (Figure 3.1D) gave both the highest adventitious shoot production per<br />

cultured explant <strong>and</strong> adventitious shoots with length greater than 10 mm (5.88 ±<br />

0.73 <strong>and</strong> 4.00 ± 0.53 shoots per cultured explant, respectively) after six weeks <strong>of</strong><br />

culture. These values were significantly different from every other treatment <strong>and</strong><br />

the control. In addition, the treatment with 7 µM MemTR gave an abnormality<br />

index <strong>of</strong> 0.37, a value lower than that observed in the control. In fact, almost all the<br />

abnormality indices recorded with mTR <strong>and</strong> MemTR concentrations were lower<br />

than that <strong>of</strong> the control, thus suggesting that the observed abnormalities in mTR<br />

<strong>and</strong> MemTR treatments could be carry-over effects <strong>of</strong> BA since the explants were<br />

originally taken from cultures containing BA. On one h<strong>and</strong>, the superiority <strong>of</strong> mTR<br />

<strong>and</strong> MemTR might be due to the presence <strong>of</strong> a ribose at their N 9 position, which<br />

better protects them against N 9 -glucosylation (WERBROUCK et al., 1996). On the<br />

other h<strong>and</strong>, the overall superiority <strong>of</strong> MemTR might be partly due to the presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the methyl group in its molecular structure. As shown by SCHIMTZ et al.<br />

(1972), the presence <strong>and</strong> position <strong>of</strong> the methyl group could greatly influence the<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> a cytokinin. They observed that a shift <strong>of</strong> the methyl group from the 3- to<br />

the 2-position in going from dihydrozeatin to dihydroisozeatin resulted in a 70-fold<br />

decrease in activity, whereas the complete removal <strong>of</strong> the methyl group as in the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> cis-norzeatin resulted in a significant loss <strong>of</strong> activity (less than a fifth as<br />

active as cis-zeatin). BAIRU (2008) reported that the addition <strong>of</strong> a methoxy group<br />

to ortho-topolin prevents the formation <strong>of</strong> a hydrogen bond between the OH group<br />

on the benzyl ring <strong>and</strong> the nitrogen at the N 1 position, a bond responsible for the<br />

intermolecular inhibition <strong>of</strong> cytokinin activity. The author further mentioned that the<br />

prevention <strong>of</strong> hydrogen bonding between the N 1 <strong>and</strong> H 16 atoms by the methyl<br />

group serves to increase cytokinin activity by maintaining the dihedral angle<br />

between least-square planes fitted through the purine <strong>and</strong> phenyl ring.<br />

61


3.3.4 Effects <strong>of</strong> photoperiod on shoot multiplication<br />

Cultures maintained under a 16 h photoperiod gave a higher (though not<br />

statistically significant) adventitious shoot production than those under continuous<br />

light (Table 3.2). The production <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots with length greater than 10<br />

mm was significantly (P = 0.01) higher in cultures maintained under a 16 h<br />

photoperiod than those under continuous light. This implies an improved growth<br />

rate in cultures placed under a 16 h photoperiod. ECONOMOU <strong>and</strong> READ (1986)<br />

similarly observed increased shoot length <strong>and</strong> quality in azalea (Rhododendron<br />

sp.) shoot-tip cultures grown under a 16 h photoperiod compared to continuous<br />

illumination, which inhibited shoot elongation. While the number <strong>of</strong> shoots<br />

produced during the first subculture was the same for both 16 <strong>and</strong> 24 h<br />

photoperiods, they further observed that continuous light significantly suppressed<br />

shoot proliferation during the second subculture. The authors gave two likely<br />

reasons for their observed response. Firstly, the dark periods (following the 16 h<br />

photoperiod) might promote the synthesis or accumulation <strong>of</strong> substance(s) which<br />

stimulate growth during the ensuing 16 h light periods. Secondly, the reduced<br />

growth in cultures under continuous light could be due to photo-oxidation <strong>of</strong><br />

endogenous IAA resulting from over-exposure to light, which might affect the<br />

endogenous balance <strong>of</strong> the growth regulators. It is very likely that the response<br />

observed in the current study may be due to change in endogenous balance <strong>of</strong><br />

growth regulators as a result <strong>of</strong> IAA photo-oxidation or synthesis <strong>of</strong> growth<br />

promoting substance(s).<br />

Furthermore, a high accumulation <strong>of</strong> CO2 in culture vessels/tubes has been<br />

reported during the dark period <strong>of</strong> a light: dark cycle (FUJIWARA et al., 1987;<br />

cited by SERRET et al. 1997). Such a high availability <strong>of</strong> CO2 could result in an<br />

increased rate <strong>of</strong> photosynthesis <strong>and</strong> reduced photorespiration, at least during the<br />

early phase <strong>of</strong> the subsequent light period in cultures maintained under a 16 h<br />

photoperiod. Photorespiration, a light dependent process, is known to reduce net<br />

CO2 fixation <strong>and</strong> subsequent growth rates in C-3 plants (SALISBURY <strong>and</strong> ROSS,<br />

1992). The increased CO2 concentration could result in decreased<br />

photorespiration by increasing the ratio <strong>of</strong> CO2 to O2 available in a reaction<br />

involving the enzyme ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (rubisco), leading to a<br />

62


faster or an improved net photosynthesis (SALISBURY <strong>and</strong> ROSS, 1992). In<br />

addition to the improved growth rate observed in cultures maintained under a 16 h<br />

photoperiod, the reduced energy consumption can greatly cut down the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

propagating this species in vitro.<br />

Table 3.2: Effects <strong>of</strong> photoperiod on adventitious shoot production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

Parameter measured<br />

<strong>greenii</strong> after six weeks <strong>of</strong> culture<br />

Photoperiod<br />

24 h light 16 h light<br />

Adventitious shoots per explant (n) 3.71 ± 0.52 5.38 ± 0.81 #<br />

Adventitious shoots with length > 10 mm (n) 1.81 ± 0.26 3.52 ± 0.53**<br />

Adventitious shoots 5 – 10 mm in length (n) 1.90 ± 0.32 1.86 ± 0.33 #<br />

Explants producing shoots (%) 100 100<br />

Mean values followed by the asterisk ( ** ) indicate a significant difference at P =<br />

0.01 while # indicates a non-significant difference at P = 0.05 according to t-test.<br />

3.3.5 In vitro rooting <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots<br />

Figure 3.5 shows the effects <strong>of</strong> half strength MS medium with or without IBA<br />

supplementation on the in vitro rooting <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots. Generally, the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> roots produced per shoot significantly increased with IBA<br />

supplementation, although there was no significant difference in the root length.<br />

Similarly, the frequency <strong>of</strong> shoots producing roots increased in cultures<br />

supplemented with IBA. There was however, no significant difference both in root<br />

length <strong>and</strong> number <strong>of</strong> roots produced by shoots from different cytokinin treatments.<br />

The low production <strong>of</strong> roots in the medium without auxin supplementation might<br />

possibly be attributed to the low endogenous auxin concentration produced in the<br />

shoot apex <strong>and</strong> transported in a basipetal manner to the basal cut surface (DE<br />

KLERK et al., 1999). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> exogenous<br />

application <strong>of</strong> IBA in root induction <strong>and</strong> elongation <strong>of</strong> many plant species has been<br />

reported (CHOFFE et al., 2000; FOGAÇA <strong>and</strong> FETT-NETO, 2005; IAPICHINO<br />

<strong>and</strong> AIRÒ, 2008). The auxin IBA can be converted to IAA <strong>and</strong> is therefore known<br />

63


to be a slow release reservoir <strong>of</strong> a more easily metabolized auxin (EPSTEIN <strong>and</strong><br />

LAVEE, 1984).<br />

Mean no. <strong>of</strong> roots per shoot<br />

Mean root length (cm)<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> shoots producing roots (%)<br />

6.0<br />

5.0<br />

4.0<br />

3.0<br />

2.0<br />

1.0<br />

0.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

bcd<br />

a<br />

a<br />

a<br />

d<br />

a<br />

abc<br />

a<br />

BA mT mTR MemTR<br />

Source <strong>of</strong> rooted shoot<br />

cd<br />

a<br />

ab<br />

a<br />

Figure 3.5: Effects <strong>of</strong> half strength MS medium with or without IBA treatment on<br />

in vitro rooting <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots. Bars with different letters are<br />

significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT.<br />

d<br />

a<br />

a<br />

a<br />

½ MS<br />

½ MS + 2.5 µM IBA<br />

64


3.3.6 Ex vitro rooting <strong>and</strong> acclimatization<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> pulsing regenerated shoots in different IBA concentrations on ex<br />

vitro percentage survival is presented in Figure 3.6. It appears that the percentage<br />

survival increased with increased IBA concentration. The best percentage survival<br />

(65%) was achieved in the treatment with 10 -3 M IBA. An increase in the pulsing<br />

period or IBA concentration might likely improve the survival rate recorded in this<br />

study. Nevertheless, the survival rate recorded in the treatment with 10 -3 M IBA<br />

was higher than that recorded in the case <strong>of</strong> acclimatized in vitro rooted shoots<br />

with 52% survival. In addition, the direct acclimatization <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots<br />

following the pulse treatment with IBA concentration is time-saving <strong>and</strong> less<br />

labour-intensive when compared to in vitro rooting followed by acclimatization. It is<br />

possible that some <strong>of</strong> the roots produced in vitro are not functional in the normal<br />

substrate to which they were transplanted, resulting in a cessation <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>and</strong><br />

subsequent death <strong>of</strong> some potted plants (DEBERGH <strong>and</strong> MAENE, 1981). The low<br />

survival rate recorded during the acclimatization <strong>of</strong> in vitro rooted shoots might<br />

also be due to the fragile nature <strong>of</strong> the roots produced, which are susceptible to<br />

damage during transplanting <strong>and</strong> can lead to plant death (DEBERGH <strong>and</strong><br />

MAENE, 1981). In general, however, there was no morphological variation<br />

observed in any <strong>of</strong> the acclimatized plants even after 3 months under greenhouse<br />

conditions (Figure 3.1F). This developed protocol has a potential <strong>of</strong> producing<br />

more than 60,000 transplantable shoots per year from a single shoot-tip explant.<br />

65


Percentage survival<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 10 -6<br />

10 -5<br />

IBA concentration (M)<br />

Figure 3.6: Effects <strong>of</strong> pulsing with different IBA concentrations on ex vitro<br />

acclimatization <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots.<br />

10 -4<br />

10 -3<br />

66


4.1 Introduction<br />

Chapter 4 In vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix<br />

Huernia hystrix (Hook.f.) N.E.Br. (Family: Asclepiadaceae) is a succulent used as<br />

a <strong>medicinal</strong> plant, destructively harvested as a whole plant <strong>and</strong> extensively sold<br />

<strong>and</strong> marketed in South Africa. In the recent survey <strong>of</strong> plants sold by traders at<br />

Zulul<strong>and</strong> muthi markets, NDAWONDE et al. (2007) listed H. hystrix as one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

threatened plant species that are more scarce (below 20%) than others. They<br />

noted that traders reported a high market dem<strong>and</strong> for this species. OLIVER (1998)<br />

described Huernia species (including H. hystrix) as interesting container plants for<br />

ornamental purposes.<br />

In some cases when the flowers are sterile, this plant does not set seed<br />

(ANONYMOUS, 2007). In other situations when the flowers are not sterile <strong>and</strong><br />

seeds are eventually produced, the plant does not <strong>of</strong>ten come true from seed<br />

(ANONYMOUS, 2007). The conventional propagation method is therefore by<br />

cuttings. Since H. hystrix is a dwarf species, very limited cuttings can be taken<br />

from the mother plant. Vertical planting <strong>of</strong> the stem cutting disposes the part in the<br />

rooting substrate to rot rather than to root (HODGKISS, 2004). OLIVER (1998)<br />

noted that asclepiad species are prone to numerous diseases <strong>and</strong> are perhaps<br />

among the most difficult <strong>of</strong> the succulent group to grow. Owing to these inherent<br />

propagation problems, HODGKISS (2004) was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that regular<br />

propagation with a few cuttings seems to be the best insurance against the loss <strong>of</strong><br />

such asclepiad species. Its conventional propagation cannot meet the increasing<br />

dem<strong>and</strong>, which will ultimately lead to extinction if no attention is given to its<br />

conservation <strong>and</strong> propagation. The need for an effective propagation method that<br />

can possibly be used as a conservation measure for this species is further<br />

heightened by it being red-listed <strong>and</strong> ranked as vulnerable in its global<br />

conservation status (HILTON-TAYLOR, 1996; SCOTT-SHAW, 1999).<br />

According to MALDA et al. (1999), nearly all succulent plant species are affected<br />

by habitat destruction <strong>and</strong> the collection <strong>of</strong> wild plants for illicit trade. The<br />

67


exponential population growth rates in developing countries since the latter half <strong>of</strong><br />

the twentieth century, leading to an increased dem<strong>and</strong> for <strong>medicinal</strong> plants, has<br />

further exacerbated this problem (JÄGER <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, 2000). The<br />

application <strong>of</strong> micropropagation techniques in the conservation <strong>and</strong> rapid mass<br />

propagation <strong>of</strong> threatened species is well known <strong>and</strong> has gained tremendous<br />

impetus in the last two decades. According to SARASAN et al. (2006), many plant<br />

species belonging to different major taxonomic categories are being tissue<br />

cultured for propagation <strong>and</strong> conservation purposes. Nevertheless, the commercial<br />

application <strong>of</strong> micropropagation techniques is generally still hampered by high<br />

production costs. These costs are attributed to high labour costs, low growth rates<br />

in vitro <strong>and</strong> poor survival <strong>of</strong> the plantlets during acclimatization (KOZAI et al.,<br />

1997). Plant growth <strong>and</strong> development in vitro are affected by a host <strong>of</strong> factors<br />

including the environmental <strong>and</strong> chemical conditions during the culture period.<br />

Environmental factors such as temperature, photoperiod, light intensity, humidity,<br />

<strong>and</strong> gaseous environment affect physiological processes in plants <strong>and</strong> are<br />

therefore critical to micropropagation success.<br />

It is well known that the optimal environmental <strong>and</strong> chemical conditions for plant<br />

growth <strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong>ten vary between species <strong>and</strong> sometimes genotypes.<br />

This therefore necessitates investigating the effects <strong>of</strong> these factors on in vitro<br />

growth <strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong> individual species while developing a<br />

micropropagation protocol especially amenable to commercial application. Up to<br />

the point <strong>of</strong> publishing the results <strong>of</strong> this study, there is no detailed report, to our<br />

knowledge, on the micropropagation <strong>of</strong> any Huernia species. In order to meet the<br />

increasing dem<strong>and</strong> for H. hystrix while conserving those in the wild, this study was<br />

aimed at developing a simple, rapid <strong>and</strong> cost-effective protocol for its clonal<br />

propagation. The effects <strong>of</strong> temperature, photoperiod <strong>and</strong> culture vessel size on<br />

adventitious shoot production were also investigated in the establishment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

protocol.<br />

68


4.2 Materials <strong>and</strong> methods<br />

4.2.1 Source material, decontamination <strong>and</strong> bulking <strong>of</strong> explants<br />

Stock plants planted in pots (Figure 4.1A) were maintained in the shade house in<br />

the University <strong>of</strong> KwaZulu-Natal Botanical Garden. Stem explants taken from the<br />

stock plants were thoroughly washed under running tap water <strong>and</strong> dipped in 80%<br />

ethanol for 60 sec prior to additional decontamination treatments. The additional<br />

decontamination treatments included the use <strong>of</strong> either 3.5% sodium hypochlorite<br />

solution, 0.1 or 0.3% (w/v) mercuric chloride solution for 10, 20 or 30 min. A few<br />

drops <strong>of</strong> Tween 20 were added to the solution as a surfactant in each case. The<br />

surface decontaminated stem explants were cut into 10 mm lengths <strong>and</strong> then<br />

inoculated on 10 ml (in culture tubes, 100 mm × 25 mm, 40 ml volume) <strong>of</strong> full<br />

strength MS medium supplemented with 30 g l -1 sucrose, 0.1 g l -1 myo-inositol,<br />

2.69 µM NAA, 22.19 µM BA <strong>and</strong> solidified with 8 g l -1 agar (Bacteriological agar–<br />

Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, Engl<strong>and</strong>). The pH <strong>of</strong> the medium was<br />

adjusted to 5.7 with KOH or HCl before autoclaving at 121°C <strong>and</strong> 103 kPa for 20<br />

min. Cultures were incubated in a growth room under continuous light provided by<br />

cool white fluorescent tubes (Osram ® L 58 W/640, 30 µmol m -2 s -1 PPF) at 25 ±<br />

1°C. The frequency <strong>of</strong> surviving decontaminated explants was recorded in<br />

percentage for each <strong>of</strong> the decontamination treatments. Based on the results<br />

obtained from this experiment, stem explants that were surface decontaminated<br />

using 80% ethanol followed by 0.3% mercuric chloride solution with a few drops <strong>of</strong><br />

Tween 20 for 20 min were cultured on the medium described above for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> bulking up more explants.<br />

4.2.2 Effects <strong>of</strong> BA <strong>and</strong> NAA on shoot multiplication<br />

Following bulking <strong>of</strong> sufficient plant material, shoot multiplication experiments were<br />

designed using stem explants, excluding terminal portions, <strong>and</strong> cut into 10 mm<br />

lengths. Concentrations <strong>of</strong> 0.00, 2.69, 5.37 <strong>and</strong> 8.06 µM <strong>of</strong> NAA were combined<br />

with 4.44, 13.32 <strong>and</strong> 22.19 µM BA in a 4 × 3 completely r<strong>and</strong>omised factorial<br />

design. A control without any plant growth regulator was included. Each treatment,<br />

including the control had 20 replicates <strong>and</strong> the experiment was repeated twice.<br />

69


Cultures were incubated under the same growth conditions stated above. After<br />

nine weeks, the following growth parameters were recorded: the total number <strong>of</strong><br />

adventitious shoots produced per cultured explant (shoot multiplication rate),<br />

number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots 5 – 10 mm long, number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots<br />

greater than 10 mm in length, number <strong>of</strong> adventitious roots per cultured explant,<br />

fresh weight <strong>of</strong> the adventitious shoots regenerated from each explant, fresh<br />

weight <strong>of</strong> the adventitious roots regenerated from each explant, percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

cultured explants producing shoots <strong>and</strong> the presence or absence <strong>of</strong> basal callus.<br />

4.2.3 Effects <strong>of</strong> temperature <strong>and</strong> photoperiod on shoot multiplication<br />

Stem explants (10 mm) were cultured individually on 10 ml <strong>of</strong> medium (full<br />

strength MS medium supplemented with 5.37 µM NAA <strong>and</strong> 22.19 µM BA)<br />

contained in culture tubes. The NAA <strong>and</strong> BA concentrations used were selected<br />

because they gave the best shoot proliferation in the experiment described in<br />

section 4.2.2. The cultures were maintained in different growth cabinets under two<br />

sets <strong>of</strong> light conditions, defined as follows: (a) 15, 20, 25, 30, <strong>and</strong> 35°C at 16 h<br />

photoperiod; (b) 25, 30, <strong>and</strong> 35°C at 24 h photoperiod. A PPF <strong>of</strong> 30 µmol m -2 s -1<br />

provided by cool, white fluorescent tubes (Osram ® L 58 W/640) was used in all the<br />

experiments. Each treatment had at least 18 replicates. After eight weeks <strong>of</strong><br />

culture, the following growth parameters were recorded: the number <strong>of</strong><br />

adventitious shoots produced per cultured explant, number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots<br />

5 – 10 mm long, number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots greater than 10 mm in length,<br />

fresh weight <strong>of</strong> the adventitious shoots regenerated from each explant <strong>and</strong> the<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> cultured explants producing shoots.<br />

4.2.4 Determination <strong>of</strong> titratable acidity<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> the results obtained from experiments on effects <strong>of</strong> temperature<br />

<strong>and</strong> photoperiod, nocturnal changes in titratable acidity was determined after eight<br />

weeks in shoots regenerated from explants cultured under a 16 h photoperiod at<br />

either 25 or 35 °C. The method described by MARTIN et al. (1990) was followed.<br />

The objective was to determine the presence <strong>of</strong> crassulacean acid metabolism<br />

(CAM) in these cultures. Shoot tissues were collected at the beginning (22:00 h),<br />

70


middle (02:00 h) <strong>and</strong> end (06:00 h) <strong>of</strong> an 8 h dark period, weighed <strong>and</strong> ground in<br />

distilled water. The ground tissues were then filtered under vacuum <strong>and</strong> the filtrate<br />

was titrated against 0.01 N NaOH to a pH 7.0. Titratable acidity was expressed in<br />

µM H + g -1 fresh weight. Each determination had four replicates.<br />

4.2.5 Effects <strong>of</strong> culture vessel size on shoot multiplication<br />

Explants were cultured in two culture vessels <strong>of</strong> different size. Individual stem<br />

explants were cultured on 10 ml <strong>of</strong> medium contained in culture tubes (100 mm ×<br />

25 mm, 40 ml volume) while three stem explants were cultured on 30 ml <strong>of</strong><br />

medium contained in tightly-closed screw cap jars (110 mm × 60 mm,<br />

approximately 300 ml volume). Each culture tube had a headspace volume <strong>of</strong> 30<br />

ml per explant while the screw cap jar had a headspace volume <strong>of</strong> 90 ml per<br />

explant. The cultures were kept in a growth room maintained at 25°C <strong>and</strong><br />

continuous photoperiod (30 µmol m -2 s -1 PPF). A total <strong>of</strong> 18 replicates (observation<br />

unit) per treatment were used. The experiment lasted for eight weeks whereafter<br />

the same growth parameters described above (section 4.2.3) were recorded.<br />

4.2.6 Indirect organogenesis<br />

The callus produced at the base <strong>of</strong> the stem explant during the bulking process<br />

was subcultured on the same medium to produce more calli. A completely<br />

r<strong>and</strong>omised experiment was designed to determine the organogenic potential <strong>of</strong><br />

these calli. Concentrations <strong>of</strong> 0.00, 0.27, 2.69, <strong>and</strong> 5.37 µM NAA were combined<br />

in a factorial manner with 0.00, 2.22, 5.55, <strong>and</strong> 11.10 µM BA. Cultures were<br />

incubated in a growth room under continuous light (30 µmol m -2 s -1 PPF) at 25°C.<br />

Each treatment had 15 replicates. After nine weeks, presence or absence <strong>of</strong><br />

organogenesis was examined <strong>and</strong> callus fresh weight recorded.<br />

4.2.7 Rooting <strong>and</strong> acclimatization<br />

For rooting <strong>of</strong> individual shoots, shoot clusters produced in the shoot multiplication<br />

stage were carefully separated <strong>and</strong> cultured in PGR free half-strength MS medium<br />

as well as half-strength MS medium supplemented with 1 µM IBA contained in<br />

71


loosely closed screw cap jars (300 ml). After four weeks <strong>of</strong> culture under<br />

continuous light (30 µmol m -2 s -1 PPF) at 25°C, the rooted shoots were planted in a<br />

potting mixture <strong>of</strong> 1:1 (v/v) ratio <strong>of</strong> soil:s<strong>and</strong>, treated with fungicide (Benlate,<br />

0.01%) <strong>and</strong> transferred to the greenhouse. The greenhouse thermostat was set to<br />

regulate the temperature at 15°C minimum <strong>and</strong> 25°C maximum. After two months<br />

<strong>of</strong> growth in the greenhouse, fresh <strong>and</strong> dry weights <strong>of</strong> shoots <strong>and</strong> roots, number <strong>of</strong><br />

roots <strong>and</strong> percentage survival were recorded.<br />

4.2.8 Data analyses<br />

The data collected were subjected to student‟s t-test or one-way ANOVA where<br />

appropriate. Where there was a significant difference (P ≤ 0.05), the means were<br />

further separated using Duncan‟s Multiple Range Test (DMRT). The analysis was<br />

done using SigmaPlot version 8.0 (t-test) <strong>and</strong> SPSS s<strong>of</strong>tware version 15.0<br />

(ANOVA).<br />

4.3 Results <strong>and</strong> discussion<br />

4.3.1 Explant decontamination<br />

All the treatments with 3.5% sodium hypochlorite solution were contaminated. The<br />

frequencies <strong>of</strong> surviving clean explants obtained in different treatments with<br />

mercuric chloride solution are presented in Figure 4.2. The treatment with 0.3%<br />

(w/v) mercuric chloride for 20 min gave the highest frequency <strong>of</strong> 55% clean<br />

explants. All the remaining treatments gave a frequency ranging from 0 to 35%<br />

decontamination. In general, the low frequency observed was due to a high<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> internal contamination <strong>of</strong> the explants.<br />

72


Figure 4.1: In vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix. (A) Stock plant. (B) Control<br />

with root production (MS medium without plant growth regulators).<br />

(C) Multiple shoot production accompanied with root formation on<br />

MS medium supplemented with 5.37 µM NAA <strong>and</strong> 22.19 µM BA.<br />

(D) Two-month-old fully acclimatized plants (E) Green callus growth<br />

with root hairs on MS medium supplemented with 5.37 µM NAA. (F)<br />

Root regeneration from callus on MS medium supplemented with<br />

2.69 µM NAA <strong>and</strong> 2.22 µM BA. Scale bar = 10 mm.<br />

73


Frequency <strong>of</strong> decontamination (%)<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

10 min<br />

20 min<br />

30 min<br />

0.1 0.3<br />

Mercuric chloride solution (w/v)<br />

Figure 4.2: Frequencies <strong>of</strong> explants decontamination in different mercuric<br />

chloride solution treatments.<br />

4.3.2 Shoot <strong>and</strong> root organogenesis<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> different combinations <strong>of</strong> NAA <strong>and</strong> BA concentrations on root <strong>and</strong><br />

shoot organogenesis are presented in Table 4.1. All the treatments showed a<br />

significantly higher adventitious shoot production compared to the control with an<br />

average <strong>of</strong> 0.71 ± 0.097 shoots per explant (Figure 4.1B). A maximum <strong>of</strong> 4.11 ±<br />

0.428 adventitious shoots per explant with 100% frequency developed on media<br />

supplemented with 5.37 µM NAA <strong>and</strong> 22.19 µM BA (Tables 4.1<strong>and</strong> 4.2, Figure<br />

4.1C). The same media also produced the highest number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots<br />

with a length greater than 10 mm. At the same concentration <strong>of</strong> NAA, adventitious<br />

shoot production generally increased with increased BA concentrations. Similarly,<br />

at the same level <strong>of</strong> BA concentration, adventitious shoot production generally<br />

increased with increased NAA concentration. It therefore appeared that BA <strong>and</strong><br />

NAA have synergistic effects on shoot multiplication. SUDHA et al. (1998)<br />

observed that supplementation with NAA in addition to BA was necessary for<br />

shoot elongation <strong>and</strong> multiple shoot production from nodal explants <strong>of</strong><br />

Holostemma annulare (an Asclepiadaceae species).<br />

74


Table 4.1: Effects <strong>of</strong> different combinations <strong>of</strong> NAA <strong>and</strong> BA on shoot <strong>and</strong> root regeneration <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix after nine weeks <strong>of</strong><br />

culture<br />

PGR combination<br />

NAA:BA (µM)<br />

Adventitious shoots Adventitious roots Adventitious shoots (n)<br />

per explant (n) per explant (n) 5 - 10 mm length > 10 mm length<br />

Control 0.71 ± 0.097 f 3.77 ± 0.527 def 0.40 ± 0.093 c 0.31 ± 0.080 f<br />

0.00:4.44 2.11 ± 0.292 e 1.57 ± 0.313 f 1.17 ± 0.203 ab 0.94 ± 0.192 ef<br />

0.00:13.32 2.91 ± 0.475 abcde 1.31 ± 0.325 f 1.26 ± 0.270 ab 1.66 ± 0.307 cde<br />

0.00:22.19 3.46 ± 0.358 abcd 1.17 ± 0.433 f 1.80 ± 0.252 a 1.66 ± 0.333 cde<br />

2.69:4.44 2.40 ± 0.296 de 8.51 ± 1.319 ab 1.00 ± 0.169 bc 1.40 ± 0.253 de<br />

2.69:13.32 2.94 ± 0.272 abcde 2.69 ± 0.590 ef 0.89 ± 0.196 bc 2.06 ± 0.275 abcd<br />

2.69:22.19 3.77 ± 0.480 abc 2.94 ± 1.332 ef 1.89 ± 0.317 a 1.89 ± 0.350 bcd<br />

5.37:4.44 2.83 ± 0.334 bcde 7.71 ± 1.338 abc 1.34 ± 0.201 ab 1.49 ± 0.230 cde<br />

5.37:13.32 3.74 ± 0.508 abc 5.89 ± 1.234 bcde 1.46 ± 0.237 ab 2.29 ± 0.375 abcd<br />

5.37:22.19 4.11 ± 0.428 a 3.91 ± 1.177 def 1.29 ± 0.203 ab 2.83 ± 0.321 a<br />

8.06:4.44 2.60 ± 0.290 cde 9.89 ± 1.364 a 0.74 ± 0.180 bc 1.86 ± 0.210 bcde<br />

8.06:13.32 4.06 ± 0.533 ab 6.23 ± 1.184 bcd 1.37 ± 0.266 ab 2.69 ± 0.366 ab<br />

8.06:22.19 3.57 ± 0.432 abcd 5.03 ± 0.964 cde 1.20 ± 0.187 ab 2.37 ± 0.343 abc<br />

Mean values followed by different letters in a column are significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT.<br />

75


Table 4.2: Frequencies <strong>of</strong> shoot, root <strong>and</strong> basal callus production from<br />

treatments with different concentration combinations <strong>of</strong> NAA <strong>and</strong> BA<br />

PGR combination Explants producing Explants producing Frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

NAA:BA (µM) shoots (%) roots (%) basal callus (%)<br />

Control 80 100 0<br />

0.00:4.44 95 75 5<br />

0.00:13.32 100 65 10<br />

0.00:22.19 100 35 10<br />

2.69:4.44 100 90 35<br />

2.69:13.32 100 85 20<br />

2.69:22.19 100 30 15<br />

5.37:4.44 95 90 25<br />

5.37:13.32 100 90 40<br />

5.37:22.19 100 70 5<br />

8.06:4.44 100 100 10<br />

8.06:13.32 100 90 25<br />

8.06:22.19 100 90 15<br />

The synergistic effect <strong>of</strong> BA in combination with an auxin on shoot multiplication<br />

has been reported for many Asclepiadaceae <strong>medicinal</strong> plants such as<br />

Hemidesmus indicus (SREEKUMAR et al., 2000), Holostemma ada-kodien<br />

(MARTIN, 2002), <strong>and</strong> Ceropegia c<strong>and</strong>elabrum (BEENA et al., 2003). Increased<br />

NAA concentration resulted in an increase in the number <strong>of</strong> adventitious roots<br />

produced per explant (Table 4.1). However, at the same NAA concentration, an<br />

increase in BA concentration caused a reduction in both frequency <strong>and</strong> the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> adventitious roots produced per explant (Table 4.2). This could be due<br />

to a reduction in the NAA:BA ratio since a high auxin:cytokinin ratio is known to<br />

promote root production. PATNAIK <strong>and</strong> DEBATA (1996) observed a similar<br />

response in Hemidesmus indicus when various concentrations <strong>of</strong> IBA were<br />

combined with a fixed concentration <strong>of</strong> kinetin.<br />

Regenerated shoots remained viable for more than six months when left in the<br />

original medium without any subculture. This has potential as a cost-effective<br />

76


short-term in vitro storage <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix germplasm. Shoot regeneration in all<br />

treatments with PGR was accompanied by callus formation at the basal cut end <strong>of</strong><br />

the explant (Table 4.2). Various workers have reported similar observations for<br />

other Asclepiadaceae species (SUDHA et al., 1998; MARTIN, 2002). The prolific<br />

adventitious shoot production coupled with callus formation at the base <strong>of</strong> the<br />

explant may be due to auxin accumulation at the basal cut ends by downward<br />

movement, which stimulates cell proliferation especially in the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

cytokinins (MARKS <strong>and</strong> SIMPSON, 1994).<br />

Table 4.3 shows the effects <strong>of</strong> different combinations <strong>of</strong> NAA <strong>and</strong> BA<br />

concentrations on fresh weights <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots <strong>and</strong> roots per cultured<br />

explant. At all NAA concentrations, supplementation with 13.32 µM BA gave the<br />

highest fresh weight <strong>of</strong> the shoots regenerated per explant, which was significantly<br />

different in most cases compared to the control. This was however not significantly<br />

different from supplementation with 22.19 µM BA. At the same BA concentration,<br />

fresh weight <strong>of</strong> the shoots regenerated per explant generally increased with<br />

increased NAA concentrations. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the fresh weight <strong>of</strong> adventitious<br />

roots produced per cultured explant was consistently lower with increased<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> BA at the same level <strong>of</strong> NAA but increased with increased NAA<br />

concentrations at the same level <strong>of</strong> BA. This could be due to the fact that BA acts<br />

specifically on shoot multiplication while NAA acts directly on cell elongation<br />

(GABA, 2005).<br />

4.3.3 Effects <strong>of</strong> temperature <strong>and</strong> photoperiod on shoot multiplication<br />

Tables 4.4 <strong>and</strong> 4.5 show the effects <strong>of</strong> temperature <strong>and</strong> photoperiod on<br />

adventitious shoot production as well as on shoot fresh weight <strong>and</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

explants producing shoots, respectively. Although there was no significant<br />

difference in the mean number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots produced per explant<br />

between the different temperature treatments under constant light, the number <strong>of</strong><br />

adventitious shoots 5 – 10 mm long significantly increased with increased<br />

temperature. Conversely, the number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots greater than 10 mm in<br />

length as well as the fresh weight <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots regenerated per explant<br />

decreased significantly with increased temperature in constant light. According to<br />

77


SALISBURY <strong>and</strong> ROSS (1992), a temperature rise increases the ratio <strong>of</strong><br />

dissolved chloroplastic O2 to CO2 in C-3 species, such that oxygen fixation by<br />

rubisco (ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase) occurs faster <strong>and</strong> photorespiration<br />

indirectly slows growth. The authors further added that at high temperatures, ATP<br />

<strong>and</strong> NADPH are not produced fast enough in C-3 plants to allow increases in CO2<br />

fixation. This might explain the results observed in the cultures incubated under<br />

constant light. Furthermore, 38% <strong>of</strong> the regenerated shoots in cultures under<br />

constant light at 35°C appear bleached. This might be due to solarization, a<br />

phenomenon described by SALISBURY <strong>and</strong> ROSS (1992) as a light-dependent<br />

inhibition <strong>of</strong> photosynthesis followed by oxygen-dependent bleaching <strong>of</strong><br />

chloroplast pigments.<br />

Table 4.3: Effects <strong>of</strong> different concentration combinations <strong>of</strong> NAA <strong>and</strong> BA on<br />

fresh weights <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots <strong>and</strong> roots produced per explant<br />

PGR combination Fresh weight per explant (mg)<br />

NAA:BA (µM) Shoot Root<br />

Control 100 ± 15 d 40 ± 4 ef<br />

0.00:4.44 130 ± 22 d 40 ± 13 ef<br />

0.00:13.32 230 ± 84 d 30 ± 23 ef<br />

0.00:22.19 100 ± 20 d 3 ± 2 f<br />

2.69:4.44 380 ± 82 bcd 330 ± 53 b<br />

2.69:13.32 680 ± 148 ab 170 ± 37 cde<br />

2.69:22.19 410 ± 69 bcd 130 ± 47 def<br />

5.37:4.44 340 ± 35 cd 360 ± 58 b<br />

5.37:13.32 680 ± 170 ab 290 ± 60 bc<br />

5.37:22.19 600 ± 98 abc 200 ± 31 bcd<br />

8.06:4.44 550 ± 114 abc 640 ± 102 a<br />

8.06:13.32 820 ± 136 a 350 ± 68 b<br />

8.06:22.19 550 ± 105 abc 330 ± 59 b<br />

Mean values followed by different letters in a column are significantly different (P =<br />

0.05) according to DMRT.<br />

78


Table 4.4: Effects <strong>of</strong> temperature <strong>and</strong> photoperiod on adventitious shoot production <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix after eight weeks <strong>of</strong> culture<br />

Temperature<br />

(°C)<br />

Adventitious shoots per explant (n)<br />

Adventitious shoots (n)<br />

5 - 10 mm length<br />

> 10 mm length<br />

16 h light 24 h light 16 h light 24 h light 16 h light 24 h light<br />

15 0.4 ± 0.20 c ND<br />

20 1.8 ± 0.31 b ND<br />

25 2.3 ± 0.40 b 4.2 ± 0.47 a**<br />

30 2.7 ± 0.48 b 4.1 ± 0.53 a#<br />

0.2 ± 0.10 c ND<br />

1.0 ± 0.26 bc ND<br />

1.5 ± 0.26 b# 1.3 ± 0.25 b<br />

1.2 ± 0.42 b 1.8 ± 0.24 b#<br />

0.2 ± 0.13 b ND<br />

0.8 ± 0.22 ab ND<br />

0.8 ± 0.25 ab 2.9 ± 0.37 a***<br />

1.5 ± 0.49 a 2.3 ± 0.42 a#<br />

35 4.2 ± 0.74 a 4.2 ± 0.47 a# 2.4 ± 0.41 a 3.4 ± 0.50 a# 1.8 ± 0.58 a# 0.8 ± 0.22 b<br />

ND = Not determined. Mean values followed by different letters in a column are significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT.<br />

Mean values in the same row per growth parameter followed by asterisks indicate significance at P = 0.001 (***) or P = 0.01 (**)<br />

while # = non significant effect according to t-test.<br />

79


Table 4.5: Effects <strong>of</strong> temperature <strong>and</strong> photoperiod on frequency <strong>and</strong> fresh weight <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots per explant <strong>of</strong> Huernia<br />

Temperature (°C)<br />

hystrix after eight weeks <strong>of</strong> culture<br />

Shoot fresh weight per explant (mg) Explants producing shoots (%)<br />

16 h light 24 h light 16 h light 24 h light<br />

15 ND ND<br />

20 114 ± 33.6 a ND<br />

25 192 ± 67.0 a 690 ± 95.6 a***<br />

30 249 ± 79.3 a 569 ± 71.6 a**<br />

28 ND<br />

83 ND<br />

89 100<br />

94 96<br />

35 192 ± 44.0 a 251 ± 34.0 b# 94 100<br />

ND = Not determined. Mean values followed by different letters in a column are significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT.<br />

Mean values in the same row per growth parameter followed by asterisks indicate significance at P = 0.001 (***) or P = 0.01 (**)<br />

while # = non significant effect according to t-test.<br />

80


On the other h<strong>and</strong>, a significant increase in adventitious shoot production with an<br />

increase in temperature was observed in cultures placed under a 16 h photoperiod<br />

(Table 4.4). At lower temperatures (15 <strong>and</strong> 20°C), the shoot proliferation rates<br />

were low due to slow growth <strong>and</strong> less differentiation <strong>of</strong> shoot meristems. Such low<br />

shoot proliferation at lower temperatures <strong>of</strong>fers an approach for in vitro storage <strong>of</strong><br />

Huernia hystrix germplasm. ISLAM et al. (2005) similarly reported a significant<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> temperature on in vitro growth <strong>of</strong> mint plants (Mentha spp.) with slow<br />

growth at lower temperature (20°C). Slow growth at lower temperatures is<br />

economically viable especially at times when labour for transplanting or<br />

subculturing <strong>and</strong> greenhouse space are not available (KOZAI et al., 1997).<br />

However, according to these authors, in vitro storage <strong>of</strong> plantlets at low<br />

temperatures for production management should maintain the photosynthetic <strong>and</strong><br />

regrowth abilities <strong>of</strong> the plantlets while suppressing growth. We observed in this<br />

study that the proliferation rate <strong>and</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> explants producing shoots<br />

generally improved when the cultures at low temperature were later incubated at<br />

25°C under constant light. Furthermore, slow growth at low temperature might<br />

have a beneficial effect on the genetic stability <strong>of</strong> the cultures (BARNEJEE <strong>and</strong><br />

DE LANGHE, 1985) since much repeated subculturing on medium containing<br />

plant growth regulators could give rise to undesirable somaclonal variation.<br />

In cultures placed under a 16 h photoperiod, the maximum number <strong>of</strong> adventitious<br />

shoots produced per explant <strong>and</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> explants producing shoots (4.2 ±<br />

0.74 <strong>and</strong> 94% respectively) were observed at 35°C. Percentage <strong>of</strong> explants<br />

producing shoots increased with increased temperature. There was no significant<br />

difference in the fresh weight <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots regenerated from each<br />

explant with increased temperature. Temperature is known to affect<br />

photosynthesis with varying optimum levels depending on the species type <strong>and</strong><br />

the environmental conditions under which the plant is grown. Often plant cultures<br />

are maintained in vitro at 25°C which is the optimum temperature for<br />

photosynthesis in many C-3 plants (SALISBURY <strong>and</strong> ROSS, 1992). However,<br />

plants exhibiting CAM are reported to have a higher optimum temperature <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately 35°C (SALISBURY <strong>and</strong> ROSS, 1992). The increased adventitious<br />

shoot production at higher temperature (35°C) observed in cultures under a 16 h<br />

81


photoperiod could therefore be due to the presence <strong>of</strong> CAM which has been<br />

reported for Huernia species (WATSON <strong>and</strong> DALLWITZ, 1992).<br />

Furthermore, a comparison <strong>of</strong> cultures grown at 25°C under constant light to those<br />

under a 16 h photoperiod gives more insight into the physiology <strong>of</strong> this plant<br />

species. A significantly higher adventitious shoot production as well as fresh<br />

weight <strong>of</strong> the shoots regenerated per explant were observed in cultures placed<br />

under continuous light compared to 16 h light (Tables 4.4 <strong>and</strong> 4.5). The<br />

frequencies <strong>of</strong> explants producing shoots in cultures placed under 24 <strong>and</strong> 16 h<br />

light were 100% <strong>and</strong> 89% respectively. The increases observed in cultures under<br />

constant light suggest that Huernia hystrix possesses a facultative C-3<br />

photosynthetic pathway requiring a longer photoperiod for best vegetative growth.<br />

On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the reduction in fresh weight <strong>of</strong> shoots regenerated per explant<br />

<strong>and</strong> shoot production observed in cultures kept under 16 h light might be due to<br />

the formation <strong>of</strong> malic acid at night or in the dark. Accumulation <strong>of</strong> malic acid in the<br />

dark is characteristic <strong>of</strong> CAM plants, <strong>and</strong> is <strong>of</strong>ten accompanied by a net loss <strong>of</strong><br />

sugars <strong>and</strong> starch (SALISBURY <strong>and</strong> ROSS, 1992). The fact that some succulents<br />

have the ability to shift between the C-3 <strong>and</strong> CAM photosynthetic pathways based<br />

on photoperiod has been reported by some authors (QUIEROZ, 1974; CHENG<br />

<strong>and</strong> EDWARDS, 1991). The similar adventitious shoot production observed in<br />

cultures at 24 h light (25°C) compared to those kept at 35°C (16 h light, Table 4.4)<br />

suggests that an increased photoperiod could in part compensate for sub-optimal<br />

temperature. Even then, the higher number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots longer than 10<br />

mm <strong>and</strong> higher fresh weight <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots regenerated per explant in<br />

cultures at 24 h light (25°C) compared to any <strong>of</strong> the cultures at 16 h light make 24<br />

h photoperiod <strong>and</strong> 25°C temperature the best environmental conditions for the in<br />

vitro adventitious shoot production <strong>of</strong> this species.<br />

4.3.4 Titratable acidity<br />

Figure 4.3 presents the titratable acidity at the beginning, middle <strong>and</strong> end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

dark periods in cultures incubated at 25 <strong>and</strong> 35°C. Generally, the levels <strong>of</strong><br />

titratable acidity at the end <strong>of</strong> the dark period were significantly higher than at the<br />

82


eginning. In the case <strong>of</strong> cultures incubated at 25°C, 35% <strong>of</strong> the increased<br />

titratable acidity was recorded by the middle <strong>of</strong> the 8 h dark period. In contrast,<br />

cultures incubated at 35°C had 92% <strong>of</strong> the increased titratable acidity by the<br />

middle <strong>of</strong> the dark period. This implies a faster increase in titratable acidity with an<br />

increase in temperature. Temperature is said to affect CAM performance in many<br />

ways (LÜTTGE, 2004). For instance, as stated by LIN et al. (2006), the catalytic<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) (an enzyme involved in dark<br />

fixation <strong>of</strong> CO2) increases with increasing temperature. BRANDON (1967)<br />

reported optimum activity <strong>of</strong> acid-producing enzymes in CAM at 35°C. However,<br />

FRIEMERT et al. (1988) explained that an increase in temperature increases the<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> malic acid efflux from the vacuole, which could lead to the exposure <strong>of</strong><br />

PEPC in the cytosol to increasing malic acid concentrations <strong>and</strong> its subsequent<br />

allosteric inhibition. The lack <strong>of</strong> significant difference <strong>of</strong> the titratable acidity<br />

between 25°C <strong>and</strong> 35°C at the different times <strong>of</strong> measurement (Figure 4.3) might<br />

be due to increased sensitivity <strong>of</strong> PEPC to malate at high night temperature<br />

(CARTER et al., 1995; LIN et al., 2006). In any case, the nocturnal synthesis <strong>and</strong><br />

accumulation <strong>of</strong> organic acid which is an essential component <strong>of</strong> CAM (LÜTTGE,<br />

2004) further indicates the presence <strong>of</strong> CAM in cultures kept under a 16 h<br />

photoperiod. Although a low night temperature <strong>and</strong> high day temperature is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

indicated as more favourable to CAM, the expression <strong>of</strong> CAM under constant<br />

temperature has been reported (CHENG <strong>and</strong> EDWARDS, 1991; LÜTTGE <strong>and</strong><br />

BECK, 1992). A combination <strong>of</strong> a hot day with lower night temperature (not tested<br />

in this study) might likely enhance the expression <strong>of</strong> CAM in this species.<br />

83


Titratable acidity (µM H + g -1 FW)<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

22:00 h<br />

02:00 h<br />

06:00 h<br />

b<br />

ab<br />

a<br />

Figure 4.3: Nocturnal titratable acidity in Huernia hystrix shoots cultured at<br />

different temperatures. 22:00, 02:00 <strong>and</strong> 06:00 h are the beginning,<br />

middle <strong>and</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 8 h dark period respectively. Bars with different<br />

letters are significantly different (Ρ = 0.05) according to DMRT.<br />

4.3.5 Effects <strong>of</strong> culture vessel size on shoot multiplication<br />

b<br />

25 35<br />

Temperature (°C)<br />

a<br />

A higher adventitious shoot production (though not statistically significant) <strong>of</strong> 5.6 ±<br />

0.94 shoots per explant was obtained with cultures in screw cap jars (Table 4.6,<br />

Figure 4.4). In the same vein, the number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots longer than 10<br />

mm as well as fresh weight <strong>of</strong> shoots regenerated per explant were higher (not<br />

significantly) in cultures contained in screw cap jars. ISLAM et al. (2005) were <strong>of</strong><br />

the opinion that larger vessels with larger air volumes create a better gaseous<br />

composition in the headspace by retarding accumulation <strong>of</strong> unfavourable gases<br />

which affect growth <strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong> plants in cultures. In the current study, the<br />

headspace volume <strong>of</strong> 90 ml per explant in the screw cap jars compared to 30 ml<br />

headspace volume per explant in the culture tubes could have created a more<br />

favourable gaseous composition in the headspace. However, KOZAI et al. (1997)<br />

stated that the type <strong>of</strong> vessel closure could also affect the gaseous composition as<br />

well as light environment <strong>of</strong> cultures. Besides the improved adventitious shoot<br />

production <strong>and</strong> fresh weight <strong>of</strong> shoots regenerated per explant, the use <strong>of</strong> larger<br />

a<br />

84


culture vessels in this study is more economical as it conserves space in the<br />

growth room (Table 4.6). Based on the number <strong>of</strong> adventitious shoots produced<br />

per explant in each <strong>of</strong> the two different vessels (Table 4.6), an additional 679<br />

shoots per square meter could potentially be produced in the growth room with the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> the screw cap jars compared to culture tubes.<br />

Table 4.6: Effects <strong>of</strong> culture vessel size on adventitious shoot production <strong>of</strong><br />

Parameters measured<br />

Huernia hystrix after eight weeks <strong>of</strong> culture<br />

Culture vessel<br />

Culture tube<br />

(40 ml)<br />

Screw cap jar<br />

(300 ml)<br />

Adventitious shoots per explant (n) 4.4 ± 0.53 5.6 ± 0.94 ns<br />

Explants producing shoots (%) 100 100<br />

Adventitious shoots > 10 mm in length (n) 2.8 ± 0.48 3.1 ± 0.63 ns<br />

Adventitious shoots 5 - 10 mm in length (n) 1.6 ± 0.25 2.5 ± 0.48 ns<br />

Shoot fresh weight per explant (mg) 560 ± 154 630 ± 168 ns<br />

Shoots (n) per m 2 space 2750 3429<br />

ns = Non-significant effect (P = 0.05) according to t-test.<br />

85


Figure 4.4: Huernia hystrix adventitious shoot production from explants<br />

4.3.6 Indirect organogenesis<br />

cultured in different culture vessels. (A) Screw cap jar [300 ml]. (B)<br />

Culture tube [40 ml]. Scale bar = 10 mm.<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> different combinations <strong>of</strong> BA <strong>and</strong> NAA on callus growth are<br />

presented in Figure 4.5. Generally, callus fresh weight increased (significantly in<br />

many cases) with increased BA concentration at the same NAA concentration.<br />

Similarly, there was a significant increase in most cases with increased NAA<br />

concentration at the same level <strong>of</strong> BA concentration. This suggests that both NAA<br />

<strong>and</strong> BA have synergistic effects on callus growth in H. hystrix. MARTIN (2002)<br />

reported shoot organogenesis from callus developed at the basal cut ends <strong>of</strong> the<br />

node <strong>and</strong> internode explants <strong>of</strong> Holostemma ada-kodien on MS medium fortified<br />

with 1.0 - 2.5 mg l -1 BA. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, PATNAIK <strong>and</strong> DEBATA (1996)<br />

reported no shoot formation from Hemidesmus indicus callus. In this study, there<br />

was no evidence <strong>of</strong> shoot induction in all the combinations evaluated. However,<br />

86


the root induction observed in some cases (Figures 4.1E <strong>and</strong> F) demonstrates the<br />

organogenic capacity <strong>of</strong> the induced callus. There may be a need to test other<br />

growth regulators for shoot induction from the derived callus <strong>and</strong> evaluate the<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> inducing somatic embryos. Meanwhile the established callus cultures<br />

could be a potential alternative source <strong>of</strong> bioactive secondary metabolite<br />

production (GIULIETTI <strong>and</strong> ERTOLA, 1999).<br />

Mean callus fresh weight (g)<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

0.00 µM BA<br />

2.22 µM BA<br />

5.55 µM BA<br />

11.10 µM BA<br />

f f<br />

0.00 0.27 2.69 5.37<br />

NAA concentration (µM)<br />

Figure 4.5: Effects <strong>of</strong> combinations <strong>of</strong> NAA <strong>and</strong> BA concentrations on callus<br />

growth. Bars with different letters are significantly different (Ρ =<br />

0.05) according to DMRT.<br />

4.3.7 Rooting <strong>and</strong> acclimatization<br />

f<br />

f<br />

f<br />

e<br />

d<br />

de<br />

d<br />

c<br />

b<br />

b<br />

The efficiency <strong>of</strong> half strength MS medium with or without IBA supplementation in<br />

rooting has been reported for many Asclepiadaceae plants (KOMALAVALLI <strong>and</strong><br />

RAO, 2000; SREEKUMAR et al., 2000; MARTIN, 2002; BEENA et al., 2003).<br />

PATNAIK <strong>and</strong> DEBATA (1996) observed that IBA was more effective than IAA for<br />

the induction <strong>of</strong> rooting in Hemidesmus indicus. Based on the results from the<br />

multiplication experiments, regenerated shoots were rooted individually on half<br />

strength MS medium with or without IBA. Table 4.7 shows the effects <strong>of</strong> half<br />

de<br />

c<br />

b<br />

a<br />

87


strength MS medium with or without supplementation with IBA concentration on<br />

rooting <strong>and</strong> acclimatization <strong>of</strong> regenerated shoots. The PGR-free medium<br />

produced an average <strong>of</strong> 7.5 roots per shoot, higher than the IBA treatment,<br />

although with no significant difference. Similarly, the treatment with IBA did not<br />

produce a significant difference in both the fresh <strong>and</strong> dry weights <strong>of</strong> the roots <strong>and</strong><br />

shoots. Rooted plantlets acclimatized successfully in greenhouse conditions with<br />

more than 95% survival <strong>and</strong> no observable morphological abnormalities (Figure<br />

4.1D). Best root induction <strong>and</strong> survival <strong>of</strong> Holostemma annulare (another<br />

Asclepiadaceae species) on half strength MS medium supplemented with 1.48 µM<br />

IBA has been reported (SUDHA et al., 1998). KOZAI et al. (1997) stated that the<br />

relatively high production costs <strong>of</strong> micropropagation, resulting mainly from high<br />

labour costs, low growth rate in vitro <strong>and</strong> poor survival rates <strong>of</strong> the plantlets during<br />

acclimatization limits its commercial application. The high number <strong>of</strong> roots per<br />

shoot produced on half strength PGR-free medium in H. hystrix with subsequent<br />

high survival rate (after direct transfer to a greenhouse environment) makes this<br />

regeneration protocol particularly attractive from an economic point <strong>of</strong> view as it<br />

reduces labour <strong>and</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> production.<br />

Table 4.7: Effects <strong>of</strong> half-strength MS medium with or without IBA<br />

supplementation on rooting <strong>and</strong> acclimatization <strong>of</strong> regenerated plants<br />

Parameter Medium<br />

½ MS ½ MS + 1 µM IBA<br />

Total plantlets potted (n) 60 60<br />

Survival frequency (%) 96.7 100<br />

Roots produced per shoot (n) # 7.50 ± 0.764 ns 6.75 ± 0.827<br />

Root fresh weight per plant (g) # 0.10 ± 0.011 ns 0.10 ± 0.018<br />

Shoot fresh weight per plant (g) # 2.47 ± 0.270 ns 2.52 ± 0.333<br />

Root dry weight per plant (mg) # 20 ± 1 ns 20 ± 2<br />

Shoot dry weight per plant (mg) # 100 ± 10 ns 90 ± 12<br />

ns = Non-significant effect (P = 0.05)<br />

# Twelve fully acclimatized 2-month-old plants were used for this analysis.<br />

88


The successful micropropagation system described here provides an effective<br />

means for the conservation <strong>and</strong> rapid clonal propagation, within a short time, <strong>of</strong><br />

endangered H. hystrix. The observations from this study provide insight into the<br />

physiology <strong>of</strong> this species when cultured at different temperatures <strong>and</strong><br />

photoperiods. This study highlights the need to investigate the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental conditions when developing efficient micropropagation protocols,<br />

especially for commercial purposes. Optimizing environmental conditions could<br />

increase growth rate, reduce labour costs <strong>and</strong> thus subsequent production costs.<br />

The increased multiplication rate <strong>and</strong> cost-effective, easy acclimatization process<br />

makes this protocol highly advantageous.<br />

89


Chapter 5 Pharmacological <strong>and</strong> phytochemical evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

5.1 Introduction<br />

<strong>Barleria</strong> species <strong>and</strong> Huernia hystrix<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> new diseases <strong>and</strong> resistance <strong>of</strong> many pathogens to currently<br />

used drugs coupled with the negative side-effects <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> these drugs have<br />

necessitated the continuous search for potent <strong>and</strong> efficacious new drugs or drug<br />

leads with minimal or no side-effects (CRAGG et al., 1997). The plant kingdom<br />

has been appropriately described as a reservoir <strong>of</strong> many novel biologically active<br />

molecules <strong>of</strong> <strong>medicinal</strong> value (TALHOUK et al., 2007). The exploration <strong>of</strong> plant<br />

resources for their phytochemical <strong>and</strong> pharmacological potential could lead to<br />

identifying such novel biologically active compounds. According to CRAGG et al.<br />

(1997), the continuing threat to biodiversity <strong>and</strong> the proven record <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

products in drug discovery, among others, give compelling reasons for exp<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

the exploration <strong>of</strong> nature to identify novel active agents as leads for effective drug<br />

development.<br />

Southern Africa is known to have a highly diverse <strong>and</strong> bioresource-rich flora<br />

estimated to be approximately one-tenth <strong>of</strong> global plant diversity (ELOFF, 1998a).<br />

This region is also known to have a high level <strong>of</strong> endemic plant species (VAN<br />

STADEN, 2008). The rich floral diversity provides a great bioprospecting<br />

opportunity for the discovery <strong>of</strong> potentially new pharmacologically active<br />

compounds. ELOFF (1998a) reported however, that only a relatively small number<br />

<strong>of</strong> plants in this flora have been evaluated for their pharmacological <strong>and</strong><br />

phytochemical potential. Yet, many plants in this region are facing the risk <strong>of</strong><br />

extinction even before they are evaluated for their <strong>medicinal</strong> <strong>properties</strong> (SHAI et<br />

al., 2008). The extinction <strong>of</strong> such species could lead to the loss <strong>of</strong> potential<br />

therapeutic compounds <strong>and</strong>/or genes capable <strong>of</strong> being exploited in the<br />

biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> new potent pharmaceutical compounds or drugs (RATES, 2001).<br />

HOSTETTMANN <strong>and</strong> MARSTON (2002) recommended dual biological <strong>and</strong><br />

chemical screening as the fastest approach in the exploration for new lead<br />

compounds from plant species. They suggested the use <strong>of</strong> simple, sensitive <strong>and</strong><br />

90


target-specific pharmacological assays with the capacity to quickly localise the<br />

chosen activity in plant extracts. Plant extracts <strong>of</strong>ten contain different chemicals<br />

with different pharmacological activities (HOUGHTON et al., 2007). Thus, the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> pharmacological tests has been recommended in order to get a<br />

complete bioactivity spectrum <strong>of</strong> a plant extract (HOUGHTON et al., 2007).<br />

Furthermore, since the aetiology <strong>of</strong> many disease states is <strong>of</strong>ten due to more than<br />

one factor, the use <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> pharmacological tests might be helpful in<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing the mechanism <strong>of</strong> action involved in the therapeutic effect <strong>of</strong> a<br />

particular plant extract (HOUGHTON et al., 2007).<br />

This study was aimed at exploring the <strong>medicinal</strong> value <strong>of</strong> two endangered <strong>and</strong><br />

endemic southern Africa species belonging to different taxonomic categories, B.<br />

<strong>greenii</strong> (a shrub) <strong>and</strong> H. hystrix (a succulent). For comparison purposes, extracts<br />

from two other <strong>Barleria</strong> species (B. prionitis <strong>and</strong> B. albostellata) were included. B.<br />

albostellata is mainly a horticultural species while B. prionitis is widely used in folk<br />

medicine to treat infection-related ailments (KOSMULALAGE et al., 2007). The<br />

leaves <strong>of</strong> B. prionitis are reportedly used in the treatment <strong>of</strong> fever, toothache, liver<br />

ailments, against ulcers <strong>and</strong> piles as well as in irritation control. The aerial parts<br />

are used in inflammation treatments <strong>and</strong> the roots to disperse boils <strong>and</strong> gl<strong>and</strong>ular<br />

swellings (SINGH et al., 2003; VERMA et al., 2005). Different extracts from<br />

different parts <strong>of</strong> these plant species were evaluated in a number <strong>of</strong><br />

pharmacological assays with a view to investigating the possibility <strong>of</strong> plant-part<br />

substitution as a conservation strategy against destructive harvesting <strong>of</strong> these<br />

species for <strong>medicinal</strong> purpose. The phytochemical <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong><br />

these species were also evaluated.<br />

5.2 Materials <strong>and</strong> methods<br />

5.2.1 Collection <strong>of</strong> plant materials<br />

Plant materials were collected during the summer in 2007. <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong> was<br />

bought from the Indigenous Nursery at Natal Botanical Gardens, Pietermaritzburg,<br />

B. prionitis from Val Lea Vista Nursery, Pietermaritzburg while B. albostellata <strong>and</strong><br />

Huernia hystrix were collected from the University <strong>of</strong> KwaZulu-Natal Botanical<br />

91


Garden, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. Voucher specimens (S. Amoo 02 NU, S.<br />

Amoo 04 NU, S. Amoo 03 NU, <strong>and</strong> S. Amoo 05 NU, respectively) were deposited<br />

in the University <strong>of</strong> KwaZulu-Natal Herbarium, Pietermaritzburg. Plant parts were<br />

dried at 50°C, ground <strong>and</strong> stored in airtight containers at room temperature in the<br />

dark.<br />

5.2.2 Pharmacological evaluation<br />

5.2.2.1 Preparation <strong>of</strong> extracts<br />

Dried, ground plant materials were extracted sequentially with petroleum ether<br />

(PE), dichloromethane (DCM) <strong>and</strong> 80% ethanol (EtOH) (20 ml/g) using a<br />

sonication bath containing ice water for 1 h each. Methanolic (MeOH) extracts<br />

(used in antioxidant <strong>and</strong> acetylcholinesterase assays) were obtained by extracting<br />

plant materials with 50% methanol (20 ml/g) using a sonication bath containing ice<br />

water for 20 min. In each case, the crude extracts were filtered through Whatman<br />

No. 1 filter paper <strong>and</strong> concentrated in vacuo at 40°C using a rotary evaporator.<br />

The concentrated extracts were air-dried at room temperature.<br />

5.2.2.2 Antibacterial activity<br />

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) <strong>of</strong> extracts for antibacterial activity was<br />

determined using the micro-dilution bioassay in 96-well microtitre plates as<br />

described by ELOFF (1998b). Overnight cultures (incubated at 37°C in a water<br />

bath with orbital shaking) <strong>of</strong> four bacterial strains: two Gram-positive (Bacillus<br />

subtilis ATCC 6051 <strong>and</strong> Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 12600) <strong>and</strong> two Gram-<br />

negative (Escherichia coli ATCC 11775 <strong>and</strong> Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883)<br />

bacteria were diluted with sterile Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth (1 ml bacteria/50 ml<br />

MH). Each crude plant extract was re-dissolved in ethanol to make a concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> 50 mg/ml. One hundred microlitres <strong>of</strong> each extract were two-fold serially diluted<br />

with 100 µl sterile distilled water in a 96-well microtitre plate for each <strong>of</strong> the four<br />

bacteria. A similar two-fold serial dilution <strong>of</strong> neomycin (0.1 mg/ml) was used as a<br />

positive control against each bacterium. One hundred microlitres <strong>of</strong> each bacterial<br />

culture were added to each well. The ethanol solvent, distilled water <strong>and</strong> MH broth<br />

92


were included as negative controls. The plates were covered with parafilm <strong>and</strong><br />

incubated overnight at 37°C. To indicate bacterial growth, 50 µl <strong>of</strong> 0.2 mg/ml p-<br />

iodonitrotetrazolium chloride (INT) were added to each well <strong>and</strong> the plates were<br />

further incubated at 37°C for at least 30 min. Bacterial growth in the wells was<br />

indicated by a change in colour, whereas clear wells indicated inhibition by the<br />

tested extracts. MIC values were recorded as the lowest concentrations <strong>of</strong> extracts<br />

showing clear wells. The minimum inhibitory dilution (MID) (ml/g) indicating the<br />

volume to which the extract derived from 1 g can be diluted <strong>and</strong> then still inhibit<br />

bacterial growth (ELOFF, 2004) was also determined for each extract. The assay<br />

was repeated twice with two replicates each.<br />

5.2.2.3 Antifungal activity<br />

Antifungal activity against C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans (ATCC 10231) was performed using<br />

the micro-dilution assay (ELOFF, 1998b) modified for fungi (MASOKO et al.,<br />

2007). Four milliliters <strong>of</strong> sterile saline were added to 400 µl <strong>of</strong> a 24-h-old C<strong>and</strong>ida<br />

culture prepared in Yeast Malt (YM) broth. The absorbance was read at 530 nm<br />

<strong>and</strong> adjusted with sterile saline to match that <strong>of</strong> a 0.5 M McFarl<strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

solution. From this stock, a 1:1000 dilution with sterile YM broth was prepared.<br />

One hundred microlitres <strong>of</strong> each extract dissolved in 80% ethanol at 50 mg/ml<br />

were two-fold serially diluted with sterile distilled water in a 96-well microtitre plate.<br />

One hundred microlitres <strong>of</strong> the dilute fungal culture were added to each well.<br />

Amphotericin B was used as a positive control while the 80% ethanol solvent,<br />

distilled water <strong>and</strong> YM broth were included as negative controls. The plates were<br />

covered with parafilm <strong>and</strong> incubated at 37°C overnight after which 50 µl <strong>of</strong> INT (0.2<br />

mg/ml) were added to each well as a growth indicator. The wells remained clear<br />

where there was inhibition. MIC values were recorded as the lowest<br />

concentrations that inhibited fungal growth after 48 h. To determine whether the<br />

activity is fungistatic or fungicidal, 50 µl <strong>of</strong> YM broth were added to the clear wells<br />

<strong>and</strong> further incubated for 24 h after which the minimum fungicidal concentration<br />

(MFC) was recorded as the last clear well. The MID (ml/g) as well as minimum<br />

fungicidal dilution (MFD) (ml/g), indicating the volume to which the extract derived<br />

from 1 g can be diluted <strong>and</strong> still inhibit the growth <strong>of</strong> or kill the fungal cells (ELOFF,<br />

93


2004) respectively, were also determined. The assay was repeated twice with at<br />

least two replicates each.<br />

5.2.2.4 Anti-inflammatory activity<br />

Anti-inflammatory activity was evaluated using the enzyme-based cyclooxygenase<br />

assays (COX-1 <strong>and</strong> COX-2) as described by JÄGER et al. (1996) as well as<br />

ZSCHOCKE <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN (2000). Plant extracts were re-dissolved in<br />

ethanol at a concentration <strong>of</strong> 10 mg/ml to give a concentration <strong>of</strong> 0.25 µg/µl in the<br />

final assay. The c<strong>of</strong>actor solution was prepared by the addition <strong>of</strong> 10 ml <strong>of</strong> 0.1 M<br />

Tris buffer (pH 8.0) <strong>and</strong> 100 µl <strong>of</strong> hematin solution to 3 mg <strong>of</strong> L-epinephrine (6 mg<br />

for COX-2) <strong>and</strong> 3 mg <strong>of</strong> reduced glutathione. The COX-1 (from ram seminal<br />

vesicles) or COX-2 (human recombinant) enzyme (Sigma-Aldrich) was, in each<br />

assay, activated with the co-factor solution <strong>and</strong> pre-incubated on ice for 5 min.<br />

Enzyme/co-factor solution (60 µl) was added to 20 µl <strong>of</strong> plant extract solution (2.5<br />

µl <strong>of</strong> plant extract + 17.5 µl distilled water) <strong>and</strong> pre-incubated for 5 min at room<br />

temperature. Twenty microlitres <strong>of</strong> [ 14 C] arachidonic acid (16 Ci/mol, 3 mM) were<br />

added to this enzyme-extract mixture <strong>and</strong> incubated at 37°C in a water bath for 10<br />

min. After incubation, the reaction was terminated by adding 10 µl <strong>of</strong> 2 N HCl.<br />

Unlabelled prostagl<strong>and</strong>ins (PGE2:PGF2, 1:1 v/v) (4 µl, 0.2 mg/ml) were then added<br />

to each sample as a carrier solution.<br />

The labelled prostagl<strong>and</strong>ins synthesized in the assay were separated from the<br />

unmetabolized arachidonic acid by column chromatography using silica columns.<br />

Silica gel (0.063-0.200 mm particle size, Merck) in eluent 1 (hexane:1,4-<br />

dioxan:acetic acid, 350:150:1 v/v/v) was packed to a height <strong>of</strong> 3 cm in Pasteur<br />

pipettes stoppered with glass wool. One millilitre <strong>of</strong> eluent 1 was added to each <strong>of</strong><br />

the assay mixtures <strong>and</strong> the mixtures were then applied to the columns. The<br />

unmetabolized arachidonic acid was eluted with 4 ml <strong>of</strong> eluent 1 (1 ml at a time)<br />

<strong>and</strong> discarded. The labelled prostagl<strong>and</strong>ins were then eluted into scintillation vials<br />

with 3 ml (1 ml at a time) <strong>of</strong> eluent 2 (ethyl acetate:methanol, 85:15 v/v). Four<br />

millilitres <strong>of</strong> scintillation fluid were added to each vial <strong>and</strong> the radioactivity was<br />

counted after 30 min in the dark using a Beckman LS6000LL scintillation counter.<br />

In each assay, four controls were run. Two were backgrounds in which the<br />

94


enzyme was inactivated with HCl before adding [ 14 C] arachidonic acid <strong>and</strong> which<br />

were kept on ice, <strong>and</strong> two were solvent blanks. Indomethacin was used as a<br />

positive control at a concentration <strong>of</strong> 5 µM for COX-1 <strong>and</strong> 200 µM for COX-2. The<br />

percentage inhibition by the extracts was calculated by comparing the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

radioactivity present in the sample to that in the solvent blank, using the following<br />

equation:<br />

Inhibition % = 1 −<br />

DPMsample − DPMbackground<br />

DPMblank − DPMbackground<br />

× 100<br />

where DPM is the disintegrations per minute. Results presented are the mean<br />

values <strong>of</strong> two experiments (each experiment in duplicate).<br />

5.2.2.5 Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition<br />

A microtitre plate assay based on the colorimetric method described by ELLMAN<br />

et al. (1961) <strong>and</strong> outlined by ELDEEN et al. (2005) was used to determine the<br />

AChE inhibition activity by the plant extracts. The following buffers were prepared:<br />

Buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8), Buffer B (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, containing 0.1%<br />

bovine serum albumin) <strong>and</strong> Buffer C (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, containing 0.1 M<br />

NaCl <strong>and</strong> 0.02 M MgCl2.6H2O). Twenty-five microlitres <strong>of</strong> each plant methanolic<br />

extract at a known concentration were two-fold serially diluted with millipore<br />

distilled water in a 96-well microtitre plate. Twenty-five microlitres <strong>of</strong><br />

acetylthiocholine iodide (ATCI) (15 mM in millipore distilled water), followed by 125<br />

µl <strong>of</strong> 3 mM 5,5-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) (dissolved in Buffer C) <strong>and</strong> 50<br />

µl <strong>of</strong> Buffer B were then added to each microtitre plate well. A similar procedure<br />

was followed with galanthamine (20 µM) used as a positive control in place <strong>of</strong><br />

plant extract. The absorbance was read every 45 s (three times) at 405 nm using a<br />

microtitre plate reader (Opsys MR TM , Dynex Technologies). After the readings, 25<br />

µl <strong>of</strong> 0.2 U ml -1 AChE enzyme (from electric eels) was added to each well <strong>and</strong> the<br />

absorbance was read again every 45 s (five times). The absorbance readings<br />

before the addition <strong>of</strong> enzyme were subtracted from the absorbance readings<br />

taken after the addition <strong>of</strong> enzyme, to correct any increase in absorbance due to<br />

spontaneous hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> the substrate. The rate <strong>of</strong> reaction was calculated for<br />

95


each <strong>of</strong> the plant extracts, the blank <strong>and</strong> positive control. The percentage inhibition<br />

by the plant extracts was calculated using the formula:<br />

Inhibition % = 1 –<br />

5.2.2.6 Antioxidant activity<br />

Sample reaction rate<br />

Blank reaction rate<br />

5.2.2.6.1 DPPH radical-scavenging activity<br />

× 100<br />

Fifteen microlitres <strong>of</strong> methanolic extracts at different concentrations were diluted<br />

with methanol to a final volume <strong>of</strong> 750 µl. The diluted extracts were then added to<br />

an equal volume <strong>of</strong> DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) (100 µM in methanol)<br />

(SHARMA <strong>and</strong> BHAT, 2009) <strong>and</strong> the mixtures incubated in the dark at room<br />

temperature for 30 min. The negative control had methanol in place <strong>of</strong> the extract<br />

while ascorbic acid <strong>and</strong> butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) were used as positive<br />

controls. The absorbance was read at 517 nm using a UV–visible<br />

spectrophotometer (Varian Cary 50, Australia). Blank solutions with methanol in<br />

place <strong>of</strong> DPPH were included for each extract, in order to correct any absorbance<br />

due to extract colour. The spectrophotometer was zeroed with methanol <strong>and</strong> tests<br />

were carried out in triplicate. The radical scavenging activity (RSA) was calculated<br />

using the equation:<br />

RSA % = 1 −<br />

extract − blank<br />

control<br />

× 100<br />

where Аextract, Ablank <strong>and</strong> Acontrol are the absorbances <strong>of</strong> the extract, blank solution<br />

<strong>and</strong> negative control, respectively. The EC50, which is the concentration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

extract required to scavenge 50% <strong>of</strong> DPPH radical, was determined for each<br />

extract using GraphPad Prism s<strong>of</strong>tware (version 4.03). The data were log-<br />

transformed, normalized <strong>and</strong> fitted into a nonlinear regression for EC50<br />

determination.<br />

96


5.2.2.6.2 Ferric reducing power activity<br />

The reducing power <strong>of</strong> the extracts was determined according to the method<br />

described by KUDA et al. (2005) with slight modification. Thirty microliters <strong>of</strong> each<br />

extract were two-fold serially diluted with methanol in a 96-well microtitre plate,<br />

followed by the addition <strong>of</strong> 40 µl each <strong>of</strong> 0.2 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH<br />

7.2) <strong>and</strong> 1% (w/v) potassium ferricyanide. The mixture was incubated in the dark<br />

at 50°C for 20 min after which trichloroacetic acid (40 µl, 10% w/v), distilled water<br />

(150 µl) <strong>and</strong> FeCl3 (30 µl, 0.1% w/v) were added. The positive controls were<br />

similarly prepared using ascorbic acid <strong>and</strong> BHT, while methanol was used in place<br />

<strong>of</strong> extract as the negative control. After incubating at room temperature for 30 min,<br />

the absorbance was read at 630 nm (JONFIA-ESSIEN et al., 2008) using a<br />

microtitre plate reader.<br />

5.2.2.6.3 β-Carotene linoleic acid assay<br />

The method described by AMAROWICZ et al. (2004) was followed with slight<br />

modification. β-Carotene (10 mg) was initially dissolved in chlor<strong>of</strong>orm (10 ml) <strong>and</strong><br />

the chlor<strong>of</strong>orm was removed by evaporation under vacuum, followed by the<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> linoleic acid (200 µl) <strong>and</strong> Tween 20 (2 ml). The mixture was then made<br />

up to 500 ml (with aerated distilled water) with vigorous shaking to form an<br />

emulsion. An aliquot (4.8 ml) <strong>of</strong> the emulsion was added to 200 µl <strong>of</strong> plant extract<br />

(6.25 mg/ml) or BHT (6.25 mg/ml), used as a positive control. Each sample was<br />

prepared in triplicate <strong>and</strong> the test systems were incubated in a water bath at 50°C<br />

for 120 min. Initial absorbance (before incubation) <strong>and</strong> absorbance at every 30 min<br />

(during incubation) were read using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Varian Cary<br />

50, Australia) set at 470 nm. A Tween 20 solution was used to blank the<br />

spectrophotometer (PAREJO et al., 2002). Antioxidant activities were expressed<br />

as ANT (%), ORR <strong>and</strong> AA (%) at t = 60 or 120 min (AMAROWICZ et al., 2004;<br />

PAREJO et al., 2002) using the following equations:<br />

ANT % =


ORR =


sample was tested in three replicates <strong>and</strong> the results were expressed in mg or µg<br />

gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per gram dry weight (DW).<br />

5.2.3.3 Total iridoid content<br />

The total iridoid content was determined following the method described by<br />

LEVIEILLE <strong>and</strong> WILSON (2002), which was adapted from HAAG-BERRURIER et<br />

al. (1978). The method was based on the characteristics <strong>of</strong> glucoiridoids to form a<br />

fulvoiridoid complex when reacted with aldehydes (such as vanillin) in an acidic<br />

medium (LEVIEILLE <strong>and</strong> WILSON, 2002). A vanillin-sulphuric acid reagent was<br />

prepared by the addition <strong>of</strong> methanol (82 ml), vanillin (100 mg) <strong>and</strong> concentrated<br />

sulphuric acid (8 ml). A blank reagent containing methanol (82ml) <strong>and</strong><br />

concentrated sulphuric acid (8 ml) was also prepared. In triplicate, the vanillin-<br />

sulphuric acid reagent (1.35 ml) was added to 150 µl <strong>of</strong> each extract. A blank was<br />

prepared for each extract by adding 1.35 ml <strong>of</strong> the blank reagent to 150 µl <strong>of</strong><br />

extract. The reaction occurred immediately at room temperature <strong>and</strong> the<br />

absorbance was read at 538 nm using a UV–visible spectrophotometer (Varian<br />

Cary 50, Australia). HPLC-grade harpagoside (Extrasynthèse, France) was used<br />

as a st<strong>and</strong>ard for the calibration curve. The total iridoid content, expressed in µg<br />

harpagoside equivalents (HE) per gram DW was determined for each extract using<br />

their differential absorbance values correlated with the calibration curve.<br />

5.2.3.4 Flavonoid content<br />

The vanillin assay as described by NDHLALA et al. (2007) was used to determine<br />

the flavonoid content <strong>of</strong> the samples. Fifty microlitres <strong>of</strong> each extract were diluted<br />

with distilled water to 1 ml before the addition <strong>of</strong> 2.5 ml <strong>of</strong> methanol-HCl (95:5 v/v)<br />

<strong>and</strong> finally 2.5 ml <strong>of</strong> vanillin reagent (1% w/v). The mixtures were incubated for 20<br />

min at room temperature after which the absorbance was read at 500 nm using a<br />

UV–visible spectrophotometer (Varian Cary 50, Australia) against a blank<br />

containing methanol instead <strong>of</strong> plant extracts. Each extract had three replicates.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ards for the calibration curve were prepared using catechin <strong>and</strong> the flavonoid<br />

content was expressed in mg catechin equivalents per gram DW.<br />

99


5.2.3.5 Gallotannin content<br />

The rhodanine assay method as described by MAKKAR (2000) was used to<br />

determine the gallotannin content. Fifty microlitres <strong>of</strong> each plant sample were<br />

diluted with distilled water to 1 ml. One hundred microlitres <strong>of</strong> 0.4 N sulphuric acid<br />

<strong>and</strong> 600 µl <strong>of</strong> rhodanine solution (0.667% w/v in methanol) were added to the<br />

diluted extract. Two hundred microlitres <strong>of</strong> 0.5 N KOH were then added after 5 min<br />

<strong>of</strong> incubation at room temperature, <strong>and</strong> 4 ml distilled water was added after a<br />

further 2.5 min. The mixtures were further incubated at room temperature for<br />

another 15 min after which the absorbance was read at 520 nm using a UV–visible<br />

spectrophotometer (Varian Cary 50, Australia) against a blank prepared similarly<br />

but containing methanol instead <strong>of</strong> plant extracts. Each extract had three<br />

replicates. Gallic acid was used to prepare the st<strong>and</strong>ards for the calibration curve<br />

<strong>and</strong> gallotannin content was expressed in µg gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per<br />

gram DW.<br />

5.2.3.6 Condensed tannin (proanthocyanidin) content<br />

This was determined using the butanol-HCl method as described by MAKKAR<br />

(2000). Three millilitres <strong>of</strong> butanol-HCl (95:5 v/v) were added to 500 µl <strong>of</strong> each<br />

sample, followed by 100 µl <strong>of</strong> ferric reagent (2% w/v ferric ammonium sulphate in 2<br />

N HCl). The mixtures were placed in a boiling water bath for 60 min. The<br />

absorbance was then read at 550 nm using a UV–visible spectrophotometer<br />

(Varian Cary 50, Australia) against a blank prepared in a similar way but without<br />

heating. Each sample had three replicates. Condensed tannins (% per dry matter)<br />

as leucocyanidin equivalents were calculated using the formula described by<br />

PORTER et al. (1986):<br />

Condensed tannins % per dry matter =<br />

where A550nm is the absorbance value at 550 nm.<br />

A550nm × 78.26 × Dilution factor<br />

% dry matter<br />

100


5.2.4 Data analyses<br />

The percentage inhibitions were log-transformed before they were subjected to<br />

statistical analysis. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA. Where there were<br />

significant differences (P = 0.05), the mean values were further separated using<br />

DMRT. The analysis was done using SPSS s<strong>of</strong>tware (version 15.0).<br />

5.3 Results <strong>and</strong> discussion<br />

5.3.1 Yield <strong>of</strong> plant extracts<br />

Tables 5.1 <strong>and</strong> 5.2 show the percentage yield obtained from different extracts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Barleria</strong> species <strong>and</strong> Huernia hystrix, respectively. Both the EtOH <strong>and</strong> MeOH plant<br />

extracts (polar extracts) have higher yields compared to the PE <strong>and</strong> DCM extracts<br />

(non-polar extracts). The yields obtained from the EtOH <strong>and</strong> MeOH extracts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Barleria</strong> species leaves were higher compared to other parts <strong>of</strong> the same plant. In<br />

H. hystrix, the yield from MeOH extracts were greater than that obtained with<br />

EtOH extract.<br />

5.3.2 Pharmacological evaluation<br />

5.3.2.1 Antibacterial activity<br />

The MIC <strong>and</strong> MID <strong>of</strong> extracts from different parts <strong>of</strong> the studied <strong>Barleria</strong> species<br />

are presented in Table 5.3. All the extracts showed a broad-spectrum antibacterial<br />

activity. The DCM extract <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> roots gave the best antibacterial activity<br />

against B. subtilis <strong>and</strong> S. aureus with MIC values <strong>of</strong> 59 µg/ml <strong>and</strong> 234 µg/ml<br />

respectively. The PE, DCM <strong>and</strong> EtOH root extracts <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> had lower MIC<br />

values (in most cases) against all the bacterial strains compared to its stem<br />

extracts. However, the harvesting <strong>of</strong> the roots <strong>of</strong> this endangered plant is<br />

destructive <strong>and</strong> could spell more problems for the survival <strong>of</strong> this species if no<br />

effective propagation measure is put in place. The observed antibacterial activity<br />

(especially in the roots) highlights the need for the propagation <strong>of</strong> this species in<br />

order to fully explore its potential therapeutic antibacterial agents. In all the<br />

101


<strong>Barleria</strong> species, the EtOH extracts had the highest MID values. The DCM <strong>and</strong><br />

EtOH extracts <strong>of</strong> B. prionitis leaves had lower MIC values against all the bacterial<br />

strains compared to similar extracts from its stems. This observation suggests the<br />

potential <strong>of</strong> substituting the leaves <strong>of</strong> this plant for its stems. The observed activity<br />

in B. prionitis is in agreement with the findings <strong>of</strong> KOSMULALAGE et al. (2007)<br />

who reported antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> ethanolic extracts <strong>of</strong> aerial parts <strong>of</strong> B. prionitis<br />

against S. aureus <strong>and</strong> Pseudomonas aeruginosa. They reported the isolation <strong>of</strong> a<br />

new compound, balarenone along with other known natural products, pipataline<br />

<strong>and</strong> 13,14-seco-stigmasta-5,14-diene-3-β-ol from the ethanolic extract, all <strong>of</strong> which<br />

showed antibacterial activity against Bacillus cereus <strong>and</strong> P. aeruginosa. The<br />

observed antibacterial activity in B. <strong>greenii</strong> <strong>and</strong> B. albostellata could be due to the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> these or other compounds. According to JÄGER et al. (1996), when<br />

active compounds are found in one species, it is likely that more species <strong>of</strong> the<br />

same genus contain active compounds <strong>of</strong> a similar nature.<br />

Table 5.4 presents the MIC <strong>and</strong> MID recorded in different extracts <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix.<br />

Although a broad spectrum activity with MIC values ranging from 0.39 to 6.25<br />

mg/ml was observed in all the extracts, only the root extracts showed good activity<br />

(< 1 mg/ml) against the two Gram-positive bacteria used. The PE extract <strong>of</strong> the<br />

roots had lower MIC values against the two Gram-positive bacteria compared to<br />

the stem <strong>and</strong> whole plant extracts, indicating its better antibacterial activity. The<br />

root PE extract also had high MID values against the two Gram-positive bacteria.<br />

In general, with some exception in root extracts, the MID recorded in ethanol<br />

extracts was generally higher than all the other extracts.<br />

102


Table 5.1: Yield (% w/w) <strong>of</strong> extracts prepared from different parts <strong>of</strong> three<br />

<strong>Barleria</strong> species in terms <strong>of</strong> starting crude material<br />

Plant species Plant part Extract Yield (% w/w)<br />

B. prionitis Leaves PE 0.706<br />

DCM 0.312<br />

EtOH 9.404<br />

MeOH 31.82<br />

Stems PE 0.362<br />

DCM 1.578<br />

EtOH 5.592<br />

MeOH 9.84<br />

Roots PE 0.224<br />

DCM 0.332<br />

EtOH 4.28<br />

MeOH 12.05<br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong> Leaves PE 2.163<br />

DCM 0.773<br />

EtOH 20.565<br />

MeOH 29.07<br />

Stems PE 1.756<br />

DCM 0.758<br />

EtOH 8.504<br />

MeOH 4.53<br />

Roots PE 0.312<br />

DCM 0.492<br />

EtOH 13.293<br />

MeOH 12.35<br />

B. albostellata Leaves PE 5.54<br />

DCM 1.866<br />

EtOH 23.306<br />

MeOH 24.38<br />

Stems PE 0.398<br />

DCM 0.35<br />

EtOH 5.306<br />

MeOH 4.56<br />

103


Table 5.2: Yield (% w/w) <strong>of</strong> extracts prepared from different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia<br />

hystrix in terms <strong>of</strong> starting crude material<br />

Plant part Extract Yield (% w/w)<br />

Stems PE 1.288<br />

DCM 1.896<br />

EtOH 18.655<br />

MeOH 34.49<br />

Roots PE 2.728<br />

DCM 1.298<br />

EtOH 5.428<br />

MeOH 15.83<br />

Whole plants PE 1.66<br />

DCM 1.895<br />

EtOH 19.577<br />

MeOH 33.72<br />

The comparatively lower activity against Gram-negative bacteria by some extracts<br />

might be as a result <strong>of</strong> the thick murein layer in these bacteria structures<br />

preventing the entry <strong>of</strong> inhibitors (MATU <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, 2003). The low<br />

potency values generally observed in some <strong>of</strong> the extracts could be due to the fact<br />

that the extracts are still in an impure form <strong>and</strong> thus there could be some<br />

compounds having an antagonistic effect on the active principle(s). In addition, it<br />

could be as a result <strong>of</strong> low concentrations <strong>of</strong> active compounds present in the<br />

extracts (RABE <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, 1997). The weak activities observed in vitro<br />

with some extracts however does not necessarily translate to a similar low activity<br />

in vivo. Some <strong>of</strong> these plant extracts, as with some drugs, may be more potent in<br />

vivo due to metabolic transformation <strong>of</strong> their components into highly active<br />

intermediates or their interaction with the immune system (GARCIA et al., 2003;<br />

NGEMENYA et al., 2006).<br />

104


Table 5.3: Antibacterial activity (MIC <strong>and</strong> MID) <strong>of</strong> crude extracts from different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species<br />

Plant species Plant<br />

part<br />

Extract Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)<br />

(mg/ml)<br />

B. s # S. a E. c K. p<br />

B. prionitis Leaves PE 3.125 3.125 3.125 3.125<br />

DCM 0.781* 1.563 1.563 1.563<br />

EtOH 3.125 3.125 3.125 3.125<br />

Stems PE 1.563 3.125 1.563 3.125<br />

DCM 3.125 6.250 3.125 3.125<br />

EtOH 6.250 6.250 6.250 6.250<br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong> Stems PE 3.125 6.250 3.125 3.125<br />

DCM 1.563 1.563 3.125 3.125<br />

EtOH 6.250 6.250 6.250 3.125<br />

Roots PE 0.780 3.125 3.125 1.563<br />

DCM 0.059 0.234 1.875 3.750<br />

EtOH 0.390 0.781 6.250 3.125<br />

B. albostellata Leaves PE 0.781 3.125 3.125 1.563<br />

DCM 0.195 1.563 3.125 0.781<br />

EtOH 1.563 1.563 3.125 3.125<br />

Stems EtOH 1.563 3.125 3.125 3.125<br />

Neomycin (µg/ml) 0.098 1.563 3.125 1.563<br />

Minimum inhibitory dilution (MID) (ml/g)<br />

# B. s = Bacillus subtilis, S. a = Staphylococcus aureus, E. c = Escherichia coli, K. p = Klebsiella pneumonia.<br />

*Values boldly-written are considered very active (< 1 mg/ml).<br />

B. s S. a E. c K. p<br />

2.259 2.259 2.259 2.259<br />

3.995 1.996 1.996 1.996<br />

30.093 30.093 30.093 30.093<br />

2.316 1.158 2.316 1.158<br />

5.050 2.525 5.050 5.050<br />

8.947 8.947 8.947 8.947<br />

5.619 2.810 5.619 5.619<br />

4.850 4.850 2.426 2.426<br />

13.606 13.606 13.606 27.213<br />

4.000 0.998 0.998 1.996<br />

83.390 21.026 2.624 1.312<br />

340.846 170.205 21.269 42.538<br />

70.935 17.728 17.728 35.445<br />

95.692 11.939 5.971 23.892<br />

149.111 149.111 74.579 74.579<br />

33.948 16.979 16.979 16.979<br />

105


Table 5.4: Antibacterial activity (MIC <strong>and</strong> MBC) <strong>of</strong> crude extracts from different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix<br />

Plant part Extract<br />

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)<br />

(mg/ml)<br />

Minimum inhibitory dilution (MID) (ml/g)<br />

B. s # S. a E. c K. p B. s S. a E. c K. p<br />

Stems PE 1.56 3.13 3.13 3.13<br />

DCM 3.13 1.56 3.13 3.13<br />

EtOH 6.25 6.25 3.13 3.13<br />

Roots PE 0.78* 0.39 6.25 3.13<br />

DCM 0.78 1.56 6.25 6.25<br />

EtOH 6.25 6.25 6.25 3.13<br />

Whole plants PE 3.13 3.13 6.25 6.25<br />

DCM 3.13 1.56 3.13 3.13<br />

EtOH 6.25 6.25 3.13 3.13<br />

Neomycin (µg/ml) 0.195 0.78 3.13 1.56<br />

8.256 4.115 4.115 4.115<br />

6.058 12.154 6.058 6.058<br />

29.848 29.848 59.601 59.601<br />

34.974 69.949 4.365 8.716<br />

16.641 8.321 2.077 2.077<br />

8.685 8.685 8.685 17.342<br />

5.304 5.304 2.656 2.656<br />

6.054 12.147 6.054 6.054<br />

31.323 31.323 62.546 62.546<br />

# B. s = Bacillus subtilis, S. a = Staphylococcus aureus, E. c = Escherichia coli, K. p = Klebsiella pneumonia.<br />

*Values boldly-written are considered very active (< 1 mg/ml).<br />

106


5.3.2.2 Antifungal activity<br />

Opportunistic fungal infections such as c<strong>and</strong>idiasis caused by C. albicans, have<br />

been reported to be common especially among immunocompromised persons with<br />

AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome) all over the world (MOTSEI et al.,<br />

2003; SHAI et al., 2008). Table 5.5 shows the antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> extracts from<br />

different parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> species against C. albicans. In general, all the extracts<br />

demonstrated fungistatic activity against C. albicans. The MIC <strong>of</strong> the extracts<br />

ranged from 0.78 to 9.375 mg/ml while the MFC ranged from 1.17 to 12.5 mg/ml.<br />

The EtOH extracts had the highest MID <strong>and</strong> MFD in all cases. The PE, DCM <strong>and</strong><br />

EtOH extracts <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> leaves had higher inhibitory activity compared to<br />

similar extracts <strong>of</strong> the stems. In the same vein, the leaf EtOH extract <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong><br />

had the highest MID compared to all other extracts <strong>and</strong> demonstrated a fungicidal<br />

activity similar to the EtOH extracts <strong>of</strong> its roots <strong>and</strong> stems. The fungistatic activity<br />

<strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> leaf EtOH extract was also higher than the EtOH extract <strong>of</strong> its stems<br />

or roots. These results suggest the potential <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> leaves in plant part<br />

substitution. The leaves can be sustainably harvested for <strong>medicinal</strong> purposes<br />

without the destructive harvesting <strong>of</strong> the roots which could threaten the survival <strong>of</strong><br />

this already rare plant species (ZSCHOCKE et al., 2000b; MATU <strong>and</strong> VAN<br />

STADEN, 2003).<br />

The antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix extracts against C. albicans is presented in<br />

Table 5.6. All the extracts showed inhibitory activity with MIC ranging from 0.78 to<br />

6.25 mg/ml. With the exception <strong>of</strong> stem EtOH extract (the MFC <strong>of</strong> which was not<br />

observed within the concentration range tested), all the extracts evaluated<br />

generally demonstrated a moderate fungicidal activity against C. albicans. The<br />

EtOH extracts had the highest MID compared to PE <strong>and</strong> DCM extracts. The EtOH<br />

extracts similarly had the highest MFD (except stem EtOH extract) compared to<br />

PE <strong>and</strong> DCM extracts. Although the PE <strong>and</strong> DCM extracts <strong>of</strong> the whole plant had<br />

the same MFC as the stem extracts, the inhibitory activities <strong>of</strong> the whole plant PE<br />

<strong>and</strong> DCM extracts were higher than that <strong>of</strong> the stem or the root. This observation<br />

possibly suggests the presence <strong>of</strong> fungistatic agents, likely acting in an additive<br />

manner in the whole plant extract compared to their individual inhibitory action in<br />

the stem or root extract.<br />

107


Table 5.5: Antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> crude extracts from different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species against C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans<br />

Plant species<br />

Plant<br />

part Extract<br />

Minimum inhibitory Minimum fungicidal Minimum inhibitory Minimum fungicidal<br />

concentration (MIC) (mg/ml) concentration (MFC) (mg/ml) dilution (MID) (ml/g) dilution (MFD) (ml/g)<br />

B. prionitis Stems PE 3.125 4.688 1.158 0.772<br />

DCM 3.125 4.688 5.050 3.366<br />

EtOH 6.250 6.250 8.947 8.947<br />

Roots PE 4.688 4.688 0.478 0.478<br />

DCM 2.343 4.688 1.417 0.708<br />

EtOH 6.250 6.250 6.848 6.848<br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong> Leaves PE 7.813 12.500 2.768 1.730<br />

DCM 0.975* 9.375 7.928 0.825<br />

EtOH 3.515 9.375 58.506 21.936<br />

Stems PE 9.375 12.500 1.873 1.405<br />

DCM 6.250 12.500 1.213 0.606<br />

EtOH 6.250 9.375 13.606 9.071<br />

Roots PE 3.125 4.688 0.998 0.666<br />

DCM 3.125 3.125 1.574 1.574<br />

EtOH 6.250 9.375 21.269 14.179<br />

B. albostellata Leaves PE 4.688 6.250 11.817 8.864<br />

DCM 1.170 4.688 15.949 3.980<br />

EtOH 4.688 6.250 49.714 37.29<br />

Stems PE 0.780 1.560 5.103 2.551<br />

DCM 0.780 1.170 4.487 2.991<br />

EtOH 3.125 3.125 16.979 16.979<br />

Amphotericin B (µg/ml) 0.048 0.193<br />

*Values boldly-written are considered very active (< 1 mg/ml).<br />

108


Table 5.6: Antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix against C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans<br />

Plant part Extract<br />

Minimum inhibitory<br />

concentration (MIC)<br />

(mg/ml)<br />

Minimum fungicidal<br />

concentration (MFC)<br />

(mg/ml)<br />

Minimum inhibitory<br />

dilution (MID) (ml/g)<br />

Stems PE 1.56 3.125 8.256 4.122<br />

DCM 1.56 6.25 12.154 3.034<br />

EtOH 6.25 > 12.5 29.848 ND<br />

Roots PE 6.25 9.375 4.365 2.91<br />

DCM 6.25 9.375 2.077 1.385<br />

EtOH 4.688 4.688 11.578 11.578<br />

Whole plants PE 0.585 3.125 28.376 5.312<br />

DCM 0.78* 6.25 24.295 3.032<br />

EtOH 6.25 6.25 31.323 31.323<br />

Amphotericin B (µg/ml) 0.048 0.193<br />

ND = Not determined<br />

*Value boldly-written is considered very active (< 1 mg/ml).<br />

Minimum fungicidal<br />

dilution (MFD) (ml/g)<br />

109


5.3.2.3 Anti-inflammatory activity<br />

Figure 5.1 presents the anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> different extracts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

species as measured by their ability to inhibit COX enzymes. Twelve out <strong>of</strong> twenty-<br />

one crude extracts evaluated showed good activity (> 70%) in the COX-1 assay<br />

while ten extracts showed good activity in the COX-2 assay. All the PE extracts<br />

(except B. prionitis stem) showed good activity in the COX-1 assay. It is<br />

noteworthy that all B. <strong>greenii</strong> extracts showed a consistently higher anti-<br />

inflammatory activity, significant (P = 0.05) in some cases, compared to B. prionitis<br />

which is reportedly used in traditional medicine. Both B. <strong>greenii</strong> <strong>and</strong> B. albostellata<br />

have no recorded usage in traditional medicine. In addition, only root EtOH<br />

extracts <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> out <strong>of</strong> all the EtOH extracts gave a very good (> 80%) anti-<br />

inflammatory activity in both COX-1 <strong>and</strong> COX-2 assays. In general, however, the<br />

non-polar extracts (PE <strong>and</strong> DCM) showed better activity compared to the EtOH<br />

extracts.<br />

Figure 5.2 shows the anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> extracts from different parts <strong>of</strong> H.<br />

hystrix. All the PE (except root PE) <strong>and</strong> DCM extracts consistently showed a high<br />

activity (> 70%) against both COX-1 <strong>and</strong> COX-2 enzymes. The EtOH extracts<br />

generally showed a moderate (40-69%) to poor activity (< 40%) against both<br />

enzymes.<br />

COS et al. (2006) observed that compounds that are potent inhibitors <strong>of</strong> enzymes<br />

in vitro frequently fail to demonstrate similar activity in vivo because, among other<br />

things, they do not pass through the cell membrane. The activity shown by the<br />

non-polar extracts in the current study is therefore <strong>of</strong> interest since lipophilic<br />

compounds extractable by non-polar solvents have better resorption through the<br />

cell membrane (ZSCHOCKE <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, 2000). The inhibition <strong>of</strong> COX<br />

enzyme is known to up-regulate the LOX pathway, resulting in the production <strong>of</strong><br />

leukotrienes, which are suggested to be responsible for many <strong>of</strong> the undesirable<br />

adverse effects associated with the use <strong>of</strong> NSAIDs (FIORUCCI et al., 2001; LI et<br />

al., 2006). Dual inhibitors <strong>of</strong> COX <strong>and</strong> LOX enzymes have been suggested to be<br />

potential classical anti-inflammatory agents with reduced adverse effects<br />

(ZSCHOCKE et al., 2000a; VIJI <strong>and</strong> HELEN, 2008). Further evaluation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

110


inhibitory activity <strong>of</strong> the extracts tested in this study against LOX enzyme may<br />

therefore be needed.<br />

Percentage prostagl<strong>and</strong>in synthesis inhibition (COX-1)<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

A Leaves Stems Roots<br />

a a a<br />

a<br />

C<br />

E<br />

bc<br />

cd<br />

bc<br />

cd<br />

f<br />

a<br />

b<br />

c<br />

cd<br />

cd<br />

d d<br />

B.p B.a B.p B.g B.a B.p B.g<br />

c<br />

Plant species<br />

b<br />

de<br />

ab<br />

a<br />

Percentage prostagl<strong>and</strong>in synthesis inhibition (COX-2)<br />

120 B Leaves Stems Roots<br />

Figure 5.1: Anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> extracts from different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

100<br />

100<br />

species in COX-1 (on the left side) <strong>and</strong> COX-2 (on the right side) assays. B.p,<br />

B.a, <strong>and</strong> B.g are <strong>Barleria</strong> prionitis, B. albostellata <strong>and</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong>, respectively.<br />

(A) <strong>and</strong> (B) are PE extracts. (C) <strong>and</strong> (D) are DCM extracts. (E) <strong>and</strong> (F) are<br />

EtOH extracts. Bars in the same graph bearing different letters are<br />

significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT. Percentage inhibition by<br />

indomethacin in COX-1 was 63.4 ± 1.98 <strong>and</strong> COX-2 was 73.6 ± 1.47.<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

D<br />

F<br />

e<br />

c<br />

bc<br />

c<br />

d<br />

e<br />

a<br />

b<br />

b<br />

a<br />

d<br />

Plant species<br />

c<br />

c<br />

ab<br />

c<br />

d d<br />

cd cd<br />

B.p B.a B.p B.g B.a B.p B.g<br />

a<br />

a<br />

111


Prostagl<strong>and</strong>in synthesis inhibition (%)<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

A<br />

B<br />

a<br />

a<br />

Plant extract<br />

Figure 5.2: Anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> different extracts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix. (A)<br />

COX-1 assay. (B) COX-2 assay. Bars with different letters in each<br />

graph are significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT.<br />

Percentage inhibition by indomethacin in COX-1 was 54.73 ± 2.00<br />

<strong>and</strong> COX-2 was 63.44 ± 2.52.<br />

5.3.2.4 Acetylcholinesterase inhibition<br />

b<br />

a<br />

a<br />

a<br />

ab<br />

a<br />

b<br />

PE DCM EtOH<br />

a<br />

ab<br />

c c<br />

Stems<br />

Roots<br />

Whole plants<br />

Figure 5.3 shows the AChE inhibition activity observed in the MeOH extracts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Barleria</strong> species. All the extracts evaluated showed a dose-dependent inhibition. In<br />

general, at the highest extract concentration (0.625 mg/ml), the leaf <strong>and</strong> stem<br />

extracts <strong>of</strong> both B. <strong>greenii</strong> <strong>and</strong> B. prionitis exhibited higher inhibitory activities than<br />

c<br />

cd<br />

b<br />

c<br />

d<br />

112


their root extracts. The leaf extracts <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> <strong>and</strong> B. albostellata showed the<br />

highest (68%) <strong>and</strong> lowest (22%) AChE inhibition respectively, at the highest<br />

extract concentration evaluated. In the same vein, at the lowest extract<br />

concentration (0.156 mg/ml), the leaf extracts <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> <strong>and</strong> B. albostellata<br />

showed the highest (38%) <strong>and</strong> lowest inhibition (3%) respectively, compared to<br />

other extracts. The inhibitory activity shown by the leaf extract <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> at the<br />

lowest extract concentration was in fact significantly higher (P = 0.05) than the<br />

activities recorded in the stem <strong>and</strong> root extracts <strong>of</strong> the same species at the lowest<br />

concentration. The findings indicate that B. <strong>greenii</strong> leaves can potentially be<br />

substituted for its stems or roots in the inhibition <strong>of</strong> the AChE enzyme. In B.<br />

albostellata, the inhibitory activity demonstrated by the stem at the lowest extract<br />

concentration was significantly greater than the activity recorded in its leaf extract.<br />

This observation suggests that the idea <strong>of</strong> plant part substitution may be species<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or biological activity dependent.<br />

Acetylcholinesterase inhibition (%)<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

efghi<br />

cdef<br />

Leaves Stems Roots<br />

cd<br />

cdefg<br />

cde<br />

a<br />

j<br />

hi<br />

fghi<br />

B. p B. g B. a B. p B. g B. a B. p B. g<br />

Plant species<br />

Figure 5.3: Dose-dependent acetylcholinesterase inhibition by different parts <strong>of</strong> three<br />

<strong>Barleria</strong> species. B.p = <strong>Barleria</strong> prionitis, B.g = <strong>Barleria</strong> <strong>greenii</strong>, B.a =<br />

<strong>Barleria</strong> albostellata. Bars bearing different letters are significantly<br />

different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT. The AChE inhibition activities by<br />

galanthamine at 0.5, 1.0 <strong>and</strong> 2 µM were 49.24, 59.81 <strong>and</strong> 77.03%,<br />

respectively.<br />

cde<br />

hij<br />

bc<br />

cdefg<br />

ij<br />

ab<br />

ghi<br />

cdefg<br />

a<br />

efghi<br />

defgh<br />

cde<br />

j<br />

fghi<br />

cde<br />

0.15625 mg/ml<br />

0.3125 mg/ml<br />

0.625 mg/ml<br />

113


The AChE inhibitory activity <strong>of</strong> extracts from different parts <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix is<br />

presented in Figure 5.4. At all the extract concentrations evaluated, the whole<br />

plant extract showed a higher inhibitory activity, statistically significant in some<br />

cases, compared to the extracts from the stems or roots. It is likely that the whole<br />

plant extract contains some compounds that act synergistically or additively to<br />

produce a higher inhibitory activity compared to their acting individually in the stem<br />

or root extracts.<br />

Acetylcholinesterase inhibition (%)<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0.15625 mg/ml<br />

0.3125 mg/ml<br />

0.625 mg/ml<br />

cde<br />

bc<br />

de e<br />

Figure 5.4: Dose-dependent acetylcholinesterase inhibition by different parts <strong>of</strong><br />

Huernia hystrix. Bars bearing different letters are significantly<br />

different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT. The AChE inhibition<br />

activities by galanthamine at 0.5, 1.0 <strong>and</strong> 2 µM were 49.24, 59.81<br />

<strong>and</strong> 77.03%, respectively.<br />

de<br />

bcd<br />

Plant part<br />

bcde<br />

Stems Roots Whole plants<br />

b<br />

a<br />

114


5.3.2.5 Antioxidant activity<br />

5.3.2.5.1 DPPH radical scavenging activity<br />

Figures 5.5 <strong>and</strong> 5.6 show the dose-response radical scavenging activities<br />

observed in the MeOH extracts <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> species <strong>and</strong> Huernia<br />

hystrix, respectively. In all the extracts, there was an increase in the DPPH radical<br />

scavenging activity with increasing extract concentration. The dose-dependent<br />

curve <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix whole plant extract was however less steep when compared to<br />

its root or stem dose-dependent curves (Figure 5.6). From their dose-response<br />

activities, their EC50 values were obtained <strong>and</strong> presented in Tables 5.7 <strong>and</strong> 5.8.<br />

The EC50 values for the different extracts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> speces ranged from 6.65 to<br />

12.56 µg/ml (Table 5.7). The EC50 values <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> leaf <strong>and</strong> all B. prionitis<br />

extracts were in fact not significantly different from the EC50 <strong>of</strong> ascorbic acid, a<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard antioxidant agent used as a positive control. In the case <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong>, the<br />

leaf extract showed a lower EC50 value compared to the stem <strong>and</strong> significantly, the<br />

root. This observation correlates well with AChE inhibitory activities observed in<br />

the leaves, stems <strong>and</strong> roots <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> (Figure 5.3). According to HOUGHTON<br />

et al. (2007), free radical reactions are involved in the pathology <strong>of</strong> many diseases<br />

like Alzheimer‟s disease, cancer <strong>and</strong> inflammation.<br />

The stem <strong>and</strong> the root extracts <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix showed a good radical scavenging<br />

activity as indicated by their EC50 values, which were not significantly different<br />

from that <strong>of</strong> the ascorbic acid st<strong>and</strong>ard (Table 5.8). In the whole plant however, the<br />

radical scavenging activity was significantly lower than any <strong>of</strong> the individual plant<br />

parts. The results suggest the likely presence <strong>of</strong> certain compounds that are<br />

perhaps antagonistic in their radical scavenging activities.<br />

115


(A)<br />

DPPH Scavenging activity (%)<br />

(B)<br />

DPPH Scavenging activity (%)<br />

(C)<br />

DPPH Scavenging activity (%)<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong><br />

B. prionitis<br />

B. albostellata<br />

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0<br />

0<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Log [Concentration (g/ml)]<br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong><br />

B. prionitis<br />

B. albostellata<br />

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0<br />

0<br />

Log [Concentration (g/ml)]<br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong><br />

B. prionitis<br />

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0<br />

Log [Concentration (g/ml)]<br />

Figure 5.5: Dose-dependent curve <strong>of</strong> DPPH radical scavenging activity <strong>of</strong><br />

different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species. (A) Leaves (B) Stems (C)<br />

Roots.<br />

116


DPPH Scavenging activity (%)<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0<br />

Log [Concentration (g/ml)]<br />

H. hystrix roots<br />

H.hystrix stems<br />

H. hystrix whole plants<br />

Figure 5.6: Dose-dependent curve <strong>of</strong> DPPH radical scavenging activity <strong>of</strong><br />

different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix.<br />

Table 5.7: DPPH radical scavenging activity <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

species<br />

Plant species Plant part<br />

DPPH radical scavenging<br />

EC50 (µg/ml) R²<br />

B. prionitis Leaves 7.14 ± 0.056 bcd 0.9949<br />

Stems 6.65 ± 0.037 bc 0.9965<br />

Roots 6.94 ± 0.033 bc 0.9984<br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong> Leaves 7.24 ± 0.326 bcd 0.9881<br />

Stems 8.09 ± 0.266 d 0.9954<br />

Roots 12.56 ± 0.401 e 0.9307<br />

B. albostellata Leaves 7.52 ± 0.169 cd 0.9952<br />

Ascorbic acid<br />

Stems 7.31 ± 0.175 cd 0.9973<br />

6.17 ± 0.434 b 0.9550<br />

Butylated hydroxytoluene 3.75 ± 0.764 a 0.9027<br />

Mean values followed by different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05)<br />

according to DMRT.<br />

117


Table 5.8: DPPH radical scavenging activity <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix<br />

Plant part<br />

DPPH radical scavenging<br />

EC50 (µg/ml) R²<br />

Stems 7.01 ± 0.183 a 0.9805<br />

Roots 7.63 ± 0.154 a 0.9724<br />

Whole plants 393.83 ± 7.364 b 0.9542<br />

Ascorbic acid 6.17 ± 0.434 a 0.9550<br />

Butylated hydroxytoluene 3.75 ± 0.764 a 0.9027<br />

Mean values followed by different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05)<br />

according to DMRT.<br />

5.3.2.5.2 Ferric ion reducing power activity<br />

The ferric ion reducing power assay (FRAP) is an assay based on an electron<br />

transfer reaction (HUANG et al., 2005). In the assay, the presence <strong>of</strong> reductants<br />

(antioxidants) in the tested extracts results in the reduction <strong>of</strong> the ferric<br />

ion/ferricyanide complex to the ferrous form, with a characteristic formation <strong>of</strong><br />

Perl‟s Prussian blue, which is measured spectrophotometrically (CHUNG et al.,<br />

2002). The degree <strong>of</strong> colour change is directly proportional to the antioxidant<br />

concentrations in the extracts (HUANG et al., 2005).<br />

Figures 5.7 <strong>and</strong> 5.8 show the reducing power <strong>of</strong> different extracts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

species <strong>and</strong> H. hystrix, respectively. All the extracts evaluated showed an increase<br />

in reducing power activity with an increase in extract concentration. However, the<br />

reducing activities <strong>of</strong> the extracts were significantly lower than the ascorbic acid<br />

<strong>and</strong> BHT st<strong>and</strong>ard controls. The ferric reducing power activity <strong>of</strong> the leaf <strong>and</strong> stem<br />

extracts <strong>of</strong> both B. prionitis <strong>and</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> were significantly higher than that <strong>of</strong><br />

their root extracts (Figure 5.7), indicating a potential plant part substitution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

leaves or stems for the roots.<br />

118


(A)<br />

Absorbance 630nm<br />

(B)<br />

Absorbance 630nm<br />

(C)<br />

Absorbance 630nm<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />

Concentration (g/ml)<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />

Concentration (g/ml)<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />

Concentration (g/ml)<br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong><br />

B. prionitis<br />

B. albostellata<br />

BHT<br />

Ascorbic acid<br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong><br />

B. prionitis<br />

B. albostellata<br />

BHT<br />

Ascorbic acid<br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong><br />

B. prionitis<br />

BHT<br />

Ascorbic acid<br />

Figure 5.7: Ferric ion reducing power activity <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

species. (A) Leaves (B) Stems (C) Roots.<br />

119


Absorbance 630 nm<br />

2.2<br />

2.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />

Concentration (g/ml)<br />

H. hystrix roots<br />

H. hystrix stems<br />

H. hystrix whole plants<br />

BHT<br />

Ascorbic acid<br />

Figure 5.8: Ferric ion reducing power activity <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia<br />

hystrix.<br />

As shown in Figure 5.8, all the extracts <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix demonstrated a poor ferric<br />

reducing power activity compared to either <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard controls (ascorbic acid<br />

<strong>and</strong> BHT) or even the <strong>Barleria</strong> species. There was no significant difference in the<br />

ferric reducing power activity demonstrated by the different parts evaluated. Taken<br />

together however, the results suggest the presence <strong>of</strong> antioxidant compounds with<br />

electron-donating ability in the different plant parts evaluated, which the assay is<br />

known to measure semi-quantitatively (AMAROWICZ et al., 2004; RUMBAOA et<br />

al., 2009). The presence <strong>of</strong> these compounds perhaps in an impure form or in<br />

small amounts in the extracts may be responsible for the generally low activity<br />

demonstrated by the extracts.<br />

5.3.2.5.3 β-Carotene linoleic acid assay<br />

This assay involves the heat-induced bleaching <strong>of</strong> carotenoids <strong>and</strong> is based on<br />

hydrogen atom transfer reactions (HUANG et al., 2005). According to<br />

AMAROWICZ et al. (2004), the abstraction <strong>of</strong> a hydrogen atom from linoleic acid<br />

120


during oxidation results in the formation <strong>of</strong> a pentadienyl free radical. This free<br />

radical subsequently attacks the highly unsaturated β-carotene molecules, leading<br />

to the loss <strong>of</strong> conjugation <strong>of</strong> the β-carotene molecules <strong>and</strong> the characteristic<br />

orange colour <strong>of</strong> the carotenoids (AMAROWICZ et al., 2004). The presence <strong>of</strong><br />

antioxidants, capable <strong>of</strong> donating hydrogen atoms can however prevent or reduce<br />

carotenoid bleaching by quenching free radicals formed within the system<br />

(BURDA <strong>and</strong> OLESZEK, 2001; AMAROWICZ et al., 2004).<br />

The antioxidant activities <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species <strong>and</strong> H. hystrix<br />

in the β-carotene-linoleic acid model system are shown in Figures 5.9 <strong>and</strong> 5.10,<br />

respectively. In <strong>Barleria</strong> species, the antioxidant activity based on the average β-<br />

carotene bleaching rate ranged from 52 to 77%. The antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> B.<br />

prionitis roots was significantly higher than that <strong>of</strong> its leaves <strong>and</strong> stems (Figure<br />

5.9A). There was no significant difference observed in the antioxidant activity<br />

(based on average β-carotene bleaching rate) <strong>of</strong> the different parts <strong>of</strong> either B.<br />

<strong>greenii</strong> or B. albostellata evaluated. This finding again suggests the potential to<br />

substitute the leaves <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> for its stems or roots.<br />

The same trend recorded in the antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> the extracts (based on the<br />

average β-carotene bleaching rate) was also observed with their oxidation rate<br />

ratio (Figure 5.9B). In this case, the lower the oxidation rate ratio, the higher the<br />

antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> the different plant parts. According to AMAROWICZ et al.<br />

(2004), the antioxidant activity at 60 or 120 min possibly demonstrates the<br />

antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> an extract more accurately than the oxidation rate ratio or<br />

antioxidant activity based on the average β-carotene bleaching rate. With the<br />

exception <strong>of</strong> B. prionitis stem, B. <strong>greenii</strong> stem <strong>and</strong> B. albostellata leaf extracts, the<br />

same trend observed for antioxidant activity at 60 min (Figure 5.9C) was also<br />

recorded at 120 min for all the extracts (Figure 5.9D). There was no significant<br />

difference between the antioxidant activities <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> leaves <strong>and</strong> roots as well<br />

as the BHT st<strong>and</strong>ard control at either t = 60 or 120 min. BHT is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

synthetic antioxidants mostly used as a food preservative (HASSAS-ROUDSARI<br />

et al., 2009). The toxicity <strong>of</strong> these synthetic antioxidants has however raised<br />

concern about their health safety, resulting in the increased search for naturally<br />

occurring antioxidants useful in food <strong>and</strong> cosmetic industries <strong>and</strong> as nutraceuticals<br />

121


(ORHAN et al., 2009; ABDEL-HAMEED, 2009). The findings from this current<br />

study suggest that the leaves <strong>and</strong> roots <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> possibly contain antioxidant<br />

agents with activity equivalent to that <strong>of</strong> BHT, which can potentially be exploited as<br />

alternatives in the food <strong>and</strong> cosmetic industries. The purification <strong>of</strong> the antioxidant<br />

agents present in these plant materials could perhaps improve their antioxidant<br />

capacity. The use <strong>of</strong> the leaves <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> is more sustainable <strong>and</strong> can<br />

potentially substitute for the roots, owing to their equivalent antioxidant activity in<br />

this assay.<br />

ANT (%)<br />

Antioxidant activity (%) at 60 min<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

A<br />

C<br />

e<br />

b<br />

bcd<br />

ab<br />

cde<br />

ab<br />

B. prionitis<br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong><br />

B. albostellata<br />

BHT<br />

bc<br />

cde<br />

de<br />

ab ab<br />

ab<br />

ab<br />

a<br />

bc<br />

ab<br />

a<br />

a<br />

0<br />

Leaves Stems Roots Control Leaves Stems Roots Control<br />

Plant part<br />

Plant part<br />

Figure 5.9: Antioxidant activities <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species in β-<br />

carotene-linoleic acid model system. Bars bearing different letters in each<br />

graph are significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT. (A)<br />

Antioxidant activity (ANT) based on the average β-carotene bleaching<br />

rate. (B) Oxidation rate ratio (ORR). (C) Antioxidant activity (AA) at t = 60<br />

min. (D) Antioxidant activity (AA) at t = 120 min.<br />

Oxidation rate ratio<br />

Antioxidant activity (%) at 120 min<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

B<br />

D<br />

d<br />

bc<br />

bc<br />

cd<br />

abc ab<br />

d<br />

abc<br />

bcd<br />

c<br />

bc<br />

a<br />

ab<br />

a<br />

bc<br />

abc<br />

a<br />

a<br />

122


In H. hystrix, the roots consistently showed a significantly higher antioxidant<br />

activity (based on average β-carotene bleaching rate), oxidation rate ratio as well<br />

as antioxidant activity at either 60 or 120 min, compared to the stems or whole<br />

plant (Figure 5.10A-D). Although there was no significant difference between the<br />

antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> the roots <strong>and</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard synthetic antioxidant (BHT) at 60<br />

or 120 min, the use <strong>of</strong> the roots <strong>of</strong> this plant may not be sustainable from a<br />

conservation point <strong>of</strong> view. In general however, the activities recorded in the<br />

different parts <strong>of</strong> all the species evaluated in this study indicate the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

antioxidant compounds with the ability to donate hydrogen atoms.<br />

ANT (%)<br />

Antioxidant activity (%) at 60 min<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

A<br />

Stems<br />

Roots<br />

Whole plants<br />

a<br />

0.8<br />

B<br />

BHT<br />

b<br />

0.6<br />

c<br />

c<br />

Figure 5.10: Antioxidant activities <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix in β-carotene-linoleic<br />

Oxidation rate ratio<br />

0.0<br />

C D<br />

a<br />

a<br />

b<br />

b<br />

Plant part<br />

Antioxidant activity (%) at 120 min<br />

acid model system. Bars bearing different letters in each graph are<br />

significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT. (A) Antioxidant activity<br />

(ANT) based on the average β-carotene bleaching rate. (B) Oxidation rate<br />

ratio. (C) Antioxidant activity at 60 min. (D) Antioxidant activity at 120 min.<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

c<br />

b<br />

b<br />

a<br />

c<br />

b<br />

Plant part<br />

a<br />

a<br />

123


5.3.3 Phytochemical evaluation<br />

5.3.3.1 Total phenolic content<br />

Figure 5.11 presents the total phenolic content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

species. In all three species, the highest total phenolic content was observed in<br />

the leaves, compared to other plant parts. In B. prionitis <strong>and</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong>, the stem<br />

phenolic contents were significantly higher than that <strong>of</strong> the root. The highest (12.79<br />

mg GAE/g DW) <strong>and</strong> lowest (1.95 mg GAE/g DW) total phenolic content were<br />

recorded in B. prionitis leaves <strong>and</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> roots, respectively.<br />

Figure 5.12 shows the total phenolic content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix. The<br />

roots had the highest total phenolic content (181.22 µg GAE/g), although not<br />

significantly different from that <strong>of</strong> the stems. The total phenolic content <strong>of</strong> the<br />

whole plant was the lowest with 128.73 µg GAE/g DW.<br />

Phenolic compounds include flavonoids, condensed tannins <strong>and</strong> hydrolysable<br />

tannins, many <strong>of</strong> which are reported to have antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory <strong>and</strong><br />

antioxidant activities (MARCUCCI et al., 2001; POLYA, 2003). According to<br />

SAMAK et al. (2009), the redox property <strong>of</strong> phenolic compounds is an important<br />

underlying factor for their antioxidant activity, giving them the ability to act as<br />

hydrogen donors, reducing agents <strong>and</strong> singlet oxygen quenchers. In the light <strong>of</strong><br />

the total phenolic content recorded in the different parts <strong>of</strong> the plant species in the<br />

current study, the amounts <strong>of</strong> some particular groups <strong>of</strong> phenolic compounds were<br />

further evaluated in the different parts <strong>of</strong> the studied species. This could possibly<br />

help in underpinning the specific phenolic groups likely to be responsible for the<br />

observed pharmacological activities.<br />

124


Total phenolic content<br />

(mg GAE/g DW)<br />

Figure 5.11: Total phenolic content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species.<br />

Total phenolic content<br />

(µg GAE/g DW)<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

a<br />

b<br />

e<br />

Leaves Stems Roots<br />

Plant part<br />

Bars bearing different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05)<br />

according to DMRT.<br />

ab<br />

Figure 5.12: Total phenolic content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix. Bars<br />

bearing different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05)<br />

according to DMRT.<br />

c<br />

f<br />

a<br />

f<br />

Plant part<br />

b<br />

d<br />

B. prionitis<br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong><br />

B. albostellata<br />

g<br />

Stems<br />

Roots<br />

Whole plants<br />

125


5.3.3.2 Total iridoid content<br />

Figure 5.13 shows the total iridoid content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> the three <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

species. The highest total iridoid content was recorded in B. albostellata leaves<br />

with 801.4 µg HE/g DW while the lowest was found in B. prionitis roots with 30 µg<br />

HE/g DW. In each <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Barleria</strong> species, the total iridoid content <strong>of</strong> the leaves<br />

was significantly higher than that <strong>of</strong> the other parts. There was no significant<br />

difference between the iridoid contents <strong>of</strong> the stems <strong>of</strong> the three species. The total<br />

iridoid content <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> roots was significantly higher than that <strong>of</strong> B. prionitis<br />

roots. The isolation <strong>of</strong> six known iridoids (shanzhiside methyl ester, 6-O-trans-p-<br />

coumaroyl-8-O-acetylshanzhiside methyl ester, barlerin, acetylbarlerin, 7-<br />

methoxydiderroside <strong>and</strong> lupulinoside) with different levels <strong>of</strong> AChE inhibitory <strong>and</strong><br />

free radical scavenging activities from aerial parts <strong>of</strong> B. prionitis has been reported<br />

(ATA et al., 2009). The AChE inhibitory <strong>and</strong> radical scavenging activities recorded<br />

in the <strong>Barleria</strong> species evaluated in this study could be due to the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

these or other iridoid compounds. The presence <strong>of</strong> iridoid compounds even at a<br />

low concentration in all parts <strong>of</strong> the three <strong>Barleria</strong> species could perhaps play a<br />

role in the pharmacological activities observed in all the extracts evaluated. Since<br />

the leaves <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these <strong>Barleria</strong> species contained more iridoid compounds,<br />

two- to twelve-fold higher than their stems or roots, they may possibly be a<br />

potential sustainable source for iridoid compounds.<br />

In H. hystrix, the roots had the highest total iridoid content <strong>of</strong> 92.6 µg HE/g DW<br />

(Figure 5.14). This value was however, not significantly different from the total<br />

iridoid content <strong>of</strong> the stems or whole plant. Some iridoids or iridoid-rich plant<br />

extracts have been reported to demonstrate antimicrobial <strong>and</strong> anti-inflammatory<br />

activities (BOLZANI et al., 1997; WANIKIAT et al., 2008). The pharmacological<br />

activities observed in the studied species could perhaps be attributed in part, to<br />

the iridoids present in the different parts <strong>of</strong> this species.<br />

126


Total iridoid content<br />

(µg HE/g DW)<br />

Figure 5.13: Total iridoid content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species. Bars<br />

Total iridoid content<br />

(µg HE/g DW)<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0<br />

d<br />

b<br />

a<br />

Leaves Stems Roots<br />

Plant part<br />

bearing different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05)<br />

according to DMRT.<br />

Figure 5.14: Total iridoid content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix. Bars<br />

bearing different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05)<br />

according to DMRT.<br />

a<br />

e e e<br />

a<br />

Plant part<br />

a<br />

f<br />

c<br />

B. prionitis<br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong><br />

B. albostellata<br />

Stems<br />

Roots<br />

Whole plants<br />

127


5.3.3.3 Flavonoid content<br />

The flavonoid content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> the three <strong>Barleria</strong> species is presented in<br />

Figure 5.15. The highest (3.92 mg Catechin/g DW) <strong>and</strong> lowest (0.35 mg<br />

Catechin/g DW) flavonoid contents were recorded in B. <strong>greenii</strong> leaves <strong>and</strong> B.<br />

albostellata stems, respectively. In general, higher flavonoid content was observed<br />

in the leaves compared to the other plant parts in each <strong>of</strong> the species.<br />

Figure 5.16 shows the flavonoid content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix. Although<br />

there was no significant difference between the values, the flavonoid content <strong>of</strong> the<br />

roots was higher than that <strong>of</strong> the whole plant or stems.<br />

In an extensive review on the effects <strong>of</strong> naturally occurring flavonoids on<br />

mammalian cells, MIDDLETON et al. (2000) observed that flavonoids<br />

demonstrate a noteworthy array <strong>of</strong> biochemical <strong>and</strong> pharmacological actions, most<br />

notable being their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory <strong>and</strong> antiproliferative effects.<br />

Many other researchers have reported the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory <strong>and</strong><br />

antimicrobial activities <strong>of</strong> flavonoids or flavonoid-rich extracts (BURDA <strong>and</strong><br />

OLESZEK, 2001; HAVSTEEN, 2002; TUNALIER et al., 2007; PATTANAYAK<br />

<strong>and</strong> SUNITA, 2008). In the present study, the flavonoid content in all the different<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> the studied species appeared to be substantially higher compared to other<br />

phenolic groups evaluated in this study. It is therefore likely that the observed<br />

pharmacological activities in the different plant parts are largely due to their<br />

flavonoid content. In addition to their quantity however, the quality or nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

flavonoid present in the different plant parts could make a difference in their<br />

therapeutic potential.<br />

128


Flavonoid content<br />

(mg Catechin/g DW)<br />

Figure 5.15: Flavonoid content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species. Bars<br />

Flavonoid content<br />

(mg Catechin/g DW)<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

2.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

b<br />

a<br />

Leaves Stems Roots<br />

bearing different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05)<br />

according to DMRT.<br />

Figure 5.16: Flavonoid content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix. Bars bearing<br />

different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05) according to<br />

DMRT.<br />

c<br />

a<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

Plant part<br />

a<br />

Plant part<br />

a<br />

bc<br />

B. prionitis<br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong><br />

B. albostellata<br />

b<br />

Stems<br />

Roots<br />

Whole plants<br />

129


5.3.3.4 Gallotannin content<br />

The roots <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> showed the highest gallotannin content with 145.33 µg<br />

GAE/g DW compared to all other <strong>Barleria</strong> species parts (Figure 5.17). In all three<br />

species, the gallotannin content <strong>of</strong> the leaves was significantly higher than that <strong>of</strong><br />

the stems. The gallotannin contents <strong>of</strong> the leaves <strong>and</strong> stems <strong>of</strong> B. albostellata<br />

were significantly higher than that <strong>of</strong> the leaves <strong>and</strong> stems, respectively <strong>of</strong> other<br />

<strong>Barleria</strong> species.<br />

Figure 5.18 shows the gallotannin content <strong>of</strong> the different parts <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix. The<br />

stems had a higher gallotannin content (49.05 µg GAE/g DW) compared to the<br />

roots <strong>and</strong> the whole plant. There was however, no significant difference between<br />

the values obtained.<br />

TIAN et al. (2009a) reported antioxidant <strong>and</strong> antibacterial activities <strong>of</strong> gallotannin-<br />

rich extracts from Galla chinensis. ENGELS et al. (2009) also reported<br />

antimicrobial activities <strong>of</strong> gallotannin-rich extracts <strong>and</strong> gallotannins isolated from<br />

Mangifera indica kernels. The antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> hydrolysable tannins (the<br />

group to which gallotannins belong) isolated from <strong>medicinal</strong> plants used in treating<br />

gastric disorders against Helicobacter pylori has been demonstrated<br />

(FUNATOGAWA et al., 2004). Some gallotannins have also been reported to act<br />

as inhibitors <strong>of</strong> particular enzymes such as the COX enzymes involved in the<br />

inflammatory pathway (POLYA, 2003). The presence <strong>of</strong> gallotannins in different<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> the species evaluated in this study could, at least, partly contribute to their<br />

antioxidant, anti-inflammatory <strong>and</strong> antibacterial activities.<br />

130


Gallotannin content<br />

(µg GAE/g DW)<br />

Figure 5.17: Gallotannin content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species. Bars<br />

Gallotannin content<br />

(µg GAE/g DW)<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0<br />

a<br />

b<br />

b b<br />

Plant part<br />

bearing different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05)<br />

according to DMRT.<br />

Figure 5.18: Gallotannin content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> Huernia hystrix. Bars<br />

bearing different letters are significantly different (P = 0.05)<br />

according to DMRT.<br />

d<br />

B. prionitis<br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong><br />

B. albostellata<br />

d<br />

Leaves Stems Roots<br />

a<br />

a<br />

Plant part<br />

a<br />

c<br />

a<br />

Stems<br />

Roots<br />

Whole plants<br />

131


5.3.3.5 Condensed tannin (proanthocyanidin) content<br />

Proanthocyanidins are made up <strong>of</strong> oligomeric <strong>and</strong> polymeric flavan-3-ols, <strong>and</strong> they<br />

have been reported to demonstrate strong antioxidant capacity (SHYU et al.,<br />

2009). SHAN et al. (2007) reported the significant contribution <strong>of</strong> proanthocyanidin<br />

to the antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> Cinnamomum burmannii. The condensed tannin<br />

content <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> the three <strong>Barleria</strong> species evaluated in this study is<br />

presented in Figure 5.19. No condensed tannin was detected in B. prionitis leaves<br />

<strong>and</strong> B. albostellata stems. Where condensed tannin was recorded, the content<br />

was generally low (ranging from 0.007 to 1.2% per g DW) in all parts <strong>of</strong> the three<br />

<strong>Barleria</strong> species evaluated. All the different parts <strong>of</strong> B. <strong>greenii</strong> had a significantly<br />

higher proanthocyanidin content compared to any part <strong>of</strong> B. prionitis <strong>and</strong> B.<br />

albostellata. There was no condensed tannin detected in H. hystrix. These findings<br />

indicate that the pharmacological activities recorded in different parts <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix<br />

as well as B. prionitis leaves <strong>and</strong> B. albostellata stems could not be due to<br />

proanthocyanidins. In other parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> species however, their<br />

proanthocyanidin content could possibly contribute, at least to a small extent, to<br />

their antioxidant <strong>and</strong> antibacterial activities.<br />

Condensed tannin<br />

(% per g DW)<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

a<br />

e<br />

e e e<br />

Leaves Stems Roots<br />

c<br />

Plant part<br />

B. prionitis<br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong><br />

B. albostellata<br />

Figure 5.19: Condensed tannin content (as leucocyanidin equivalents) <strong>of</strong><br />

d<br />

b<br />

different parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species. Bars bearing different<br />

letters are significantly different (P = 0.05) according to DMRT.<br />

132


Overall, the results from this study demonstrate the therapeutic potential <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Barleria</strong> species evaluated as well as that <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix. As far as can be<br />

ascertained <strong>and</strong> besides the published article from this study, this is the first report<br />

on the antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, AChE inhibition <strong>and</strong> antioxidant activities <strong>of</strong><br />

B. <strong>greenii</strong>, B. albostellata <strong>and</strong> H. hystrix. The observed activities might largely be<br />

due to their flavonoid content, with a contributing effect from their iridoid <strong>and</strong> tannin<br />

compounds. The concept <strong>of</strong> substituting plant parts for sustainable exploitation<br />

appeared to be dependent on the species <strong>and</strong>/or biological activity evaluated. The<br />

substantial better activities observed with B. <strong>greenii</strong> in some cases highlight the<br />

need to conserve our plant resources before they become extinct, since some <strong>of</strong><br />

them could be pharmacologically active <strong>and</strong> perhaps contain novel compounds<br />

that are biologically active against some treatment-resistant infections.<br />

133


Chapter 6 General conclusions<br />

An effective micropropagation protocol was developed for B. <strong>greenii</strong>, an<br />

endangered <strong>and</strong> endemic South Africa horticultural shrub. Based on the highest<br />

regeneration rate obtained, more than 60,000 transplantable shoots per year can<br />

potentially be produced from a single shoot-tip explant using this protocol.<br />

Culturing under a 16 h photoperiod was more favourable for adventitious shoot<br />

production than culturing under continuous light. Higher adventitious shoot<br />

production was obtained in the treatments with BA alone when compared to the<br />

BA treatments supplemented with NAA concentrations. These results indicate that<br />

the exogenous application <strong>of</strong> NAA is not a requirement for adventitious shoot<br />

production <strong>of</strong> this plant species. The treatments with BA, commonly used in<br />

micropropagation industry, resulted in a comparatively high abnormality index in<br />

regenerated adventitious shoots from shoot-tip explants. Increased adventitious<br />

shoots <strong>and</strong> reduced abnormality indices were observed in the treatments with<br />

mTR <strong>and</strong> MemTR even at higher concentrations (5 <strong>and</strong> 7 µM). The topolins (mTR<br />

<strong>and</strong> MemTR) are less toxic <strong>and</strong> more effective than BA in the micropropagation <strong>of</strong><br />

this plant species. The abnormality indices recorded in treatments with some<br />

topolin concentrations were in fact lower than what was observed in the control. It<br />

is possible that the observed abnormalities in the treatments with topolins are<br />

carry-over effects <strong>of</strong> BA since the explants used were taken from BA-treated<br />

cultures. The use <strong>of</strong> explants that have not been exposed to BA treatments may<br />

be necessary to confirm the effect <strong>of</strong> the topolin treatments on the induction <strong>of</strong><br />

abnormalities in this plant species.<br />

Unlike in B. <strong>greenii</strong>, the treatments with a combination <strong>of</strong> BA <strong>and</strong> NAA showed a<br />

synergistic effect on adventitious shoot regeneration <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix, an endangered<br />

ornamental succulent. Regenerated adventitious shoots were successfully<br />

acclimatized with a high survival rate. Environmental factors such as temperature<br />

<strong>and</strong> photoperiod significantly affected adventitious shoot production. This study<br />

highlights the need to investigate the effects <strong>of</strong> environmental conditions when<br />

developing efficient micropropagation protocols, especially for commercial<br />

purposes. Optimizing environmental conditions could increase shoot production,<br />

134


educe labour costs <strong>and</strong> thus subsequent production costs. The observations from<br />

this study also provide an insight into the physiology <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix when cultured at<br />

different temperatures <strong>and</strong> photoperiods. The results suggest that this ornamental<br />

succulent possibly has the ability to shift between the C-3 <strong>and</strong> CAM photosynthetic<br />

pathways depending on the photoperiod conditions under which the plants are<br />

cultured. In cultures maintained at lower temperatures (15 <strong>and</strong> 20°C) under a 16 h<br />

photoperiod, low shoot proliferation rates were observed due to slow growth <strong>and</strong><br />

less differentiation <strong>of</strong> shoot meristems. In addition to <strong>of</strong>fering an approach for<br />

short-term in vitro storage <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix germplasm, such slow growth at low<br />

temperatures is economically beneficial when manpower requirement for<br />

subculturing is not available.<br />

The pharmacological activities <strong>and</strong> phytochemical <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> the species<br />

studied in this research highlight their therapeutic potential. Extracts from different<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> three <strong>Barleria</strong> species <strong>and</strong> H. hystrix demonstrated different levels <strong>of</strong><br />

antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory <strong>and</strong> AChE inhibition<br />

activities. The pharmacological activities observed in some extracts <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix<br />

might possibly explain its heavy exploitation in traditional medicine. In general,<br />

however, the <strong>Barleria</strong> species evaluated showed better pharmacological activities<br />

compared to H. hystrix. Although B. <strong>greenii</strong> has no recorded usage in traditional<br />

medicine, some <strong>of</strong> its extracts particularly demonstrated higher pharmacological<br />

activities in some cases than other <strong>Barleria</strong> species evaluated. In some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pharmacological assays, the leaves <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> species <strong>and</strong> stems <strong>of</strong> H. hystrix<br />

demonstrated higher activities than the other plant parts, suggesting their potential<br />

in plant part substitution. The harvesting <strong>of</strong> leaves or stems as a conservation<br />

strategy is certainly more sustainable than the destructive use <strong>of</strong> the roots <strong>of</strong> these<br />

threatened plant species. The results obtained from this study also suggest that<br />

the concept <strong>of</strong> plant part substitution is dependent on the plant species <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

pharmacological activity <strong>of</strong> interest. The phytochemical evaluation <strong>of</strong> the studied<br />

species indicated that the various activities shown by the extracts could possibly<br />

be due to their phenolic (including flavonoids, proanthocyanidins <strong>and</strong> gallotannin)<br />

<strong>and</strong> iridoid content. The isolation <strong>of</strong> specific bioactive compounds through<br />

bioassay-guided fractionation <strong>and</strong> their characterization as well as studies<br />

135


evaluating their safety may be necessary in the exploration <strong>of</strong> these species for<br />

potential new therapeutic drugs or drug leads.<br />

Taken together, the present study highlights the need for the conservation <strong>of</strong> our<br />

indigenous plant resources. In vitro propagation methods <strong>of</strong>fer powerful<br />

techniques for rapid propagation <strong>and</strong> germplasm storage <strong>of</strong> our endemic <strong>and</strong><br />

threatened plant species.<br />

136


References<br />

ABDEL-HAMEED, E.S. 2009. Total phenolic contents <strong>and</strong> free radical scavenging<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> certain Egyptian Ficus species leaf samples. Food Chemistry 114:<br />

1271-1277<br />

ABOEL-NIL, M.M. 1997. Tissue culture <strong>of</strong> native plants in the developing<br />

countries. Acta Horticulturae 447: 507-512<br />

AFOLAYAN, A. <strong>and</strong> ADEBOLA, P.O. 2004. In vitro propagation: a<br />

biotechnological tool capable <strong>of</strong> solving the problem <strong>of</strong> <strong>medicinal</strong> plants<br />

decimation in South Africa. African Journal <strong>of</strong> Biotechnology 3: 683-687<br />

AGASTIAN, P., WILLIAMS, L. <strong>and</strong> IGNACIMUTHU, S. 2006. In vitro propagation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Justicia gendarussa Burm. f. – A <strong>medicinal</strong> plant. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Biotechnology 5: 246-248<br />

AKIYAMA, H., FUJII, K., YAMASAKI, O., OONO, T. <strong>and</strong> IWATSUKI, K. 2001.<br />

Antibacterial action <strong>of</strong> several tannins against Staphylococcus aureus.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 48: 487-491<br />

ALONI, R. 1995. The induction <strong>of</strong> vascular tissues by auxin <strong>and</strong> cytokinin. In: Plant<br />

Hormones: Physiology, Biochemistry <strong>and</strong> Molecular Biology. Davies, P.J.<br />

(ed.) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, pp. 531-546<br />

AL-TURKI, T.A. 2002. An initiative in exploration <strong>and</strong> management <strong>of</strong> plant<br />

genetic diversity in Saudi Arabia. In: Managing Plant Genetic Diversity.<br />

Engels, J.M.M., Ramanatha Rao V., Brown, A.H.D. <strong>and</strong> Jackson, M.T. (eds.)<br />

IPGRI, pp 339-349<br />

AMAROWICZ, R., PEGG, R.B., RAHIMI-MOGHADDAM, P., BARL, B. <strong>and</strong><br />

WEIL, J.A. 2004. Free-radical scavenging capacity <strong>and</strong> antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong><br />

selected plant species from the Canadian prairies. Food Chemistry 84: 551-<br />

562<br />

137


ANAND, Y. <strong>and</strong> BANSAL, Y.K. 1998. Plantlet formation through shoot tip culture<br />

in Vasaka (Adhatoda vasica. Nees.). Journal <strong>of</strong> Indian Botanical Society 77:<br />

163-165<br />

ANDRADE, L.B., ECHEVERRIGARAY, S., FRACARO, F., PAULETTI, G.F. <strong>and</strong><br />

ROTA, L. 1999. The effect <strong>of</strong> growth regulators on shoot propagation <strong>and</strong><br />

rooting <strong>of</strong> common lavender (Lav<strong>and</strong>ula vera DC). Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong><br />

Organ Culture 56: 79-83<br />

ANONYMOUS. 2007. Accessed at http://davesgarden.com/guides/pf/go/61219/.<br />

Accessed on 4 March 2007<br />

ARYA, V., SHEKHAWAT, N.S. <strong>and</strong> SINGH, R.P. 2003. <strong>Micropropagation</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Leptadenia reticulata – a <strong>medicinal</strong> plant. In Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental<br />

Biology – Plant 39: 180–185<br />

ASAKO, H., KUBES, P., WALLACE, J., GAGINELLA, T., WOLF, R.E. <strong>and</strong><br />

GRANGER, D.N. 1992. Indomethacin-induced leukocyte adhesion in<br />

mesenteric venules: Role <strong>of</strong> lipoxygenase products. American Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Physiology 262: G903-G908<br />

ASHOK KUMAR, H.G., MURTHY, H.N. <strong>and</strong> PAEK, K.Y. 2002. Somatic<br />

embryogenesis <strong>and</strong> plant regeneration in Gymnema sylvestre. Plant Cell,<br />

Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ Culture 71: 85–88<br />

ATA, A., KALHARI, K.S. <strong>and</strong> SAMARASEKERA, R. 2009. Chemical constituents<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> prionitis <strong>and</strong> their enzyme inhibitory <strong>and</strong> free radical scavenging<br />

activities. Phytochemistry Letters 2: 37–40<br />

AUER, C.A., LALOUE, M., COHEN, J.D. <strong>and</strong> COOKE, T.J. 1992. Uptake <strong>and</strong><br />

metabolism <strong>of</strong> benzyladenine during shoot organogenesis in Petunia leaf<br />

explants. Plant Growth Regulation 11: 105-114<br />

AZAD, M.A.K., YOKOTA, S., BEGUM, F. <strong>and</strong> YOSHIZAWA, N. 2009. Plant<br />

regeneration through somatic embryogenesis <strong>of</strong> a <strong>medicinal</strong> plant,<br />

Phellodendron amurense Rupr. In Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology<br />

– Plant 45: 441-449<br />

138


BAIRU, M.W., JAIN, N., STIRK, W.A., DOLEŽAL, K. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J.<br />

2009. Solving the problem <strong>of</strong> shoot-tip necrosis in Harpagophytum<br />

procumbens by changing the cytokinin types, calcium <strong>and</strong> boron<br />

concentrations in the medium. South African Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany 75: 122-127<br />

BAIRU, M.W., STIRK, W.A., DOLEŽAL, K. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J. 2007.<br />

Optimizing the micropropagation protocol for the endangered Aloe polyphylla:<br />

can meta-topolin <strong>and</strong> its derivatives serve as replacement for benzyladenine<br />

<strong>and</strong> zeatin? Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ Culture 90: 15-23<br />

BAIRU, M.W., STIRK, W.A., DOLEŽAL, K. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J. 2008. The role<br />

<strong>of</strong> topolins in micropropagation <strong>and</strong> somaclonal variation <strong>of</strong> banana cultivars<br />

„Williams‟ <strong>and</strong> „Gr<strong>and</strong> Naine‟ (Musa spp. AAA). Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ<br />

Culture 95: 373-379<br />

BAJGUZ, A. <strong>and</strong> PIOTROWSKA, A. 2009. Conjugates <strong>of</strong> auxin <strong>and</strong> cytokinin.<br />

Phytochemistry 70: 957-969<br />

BALKWILL, M.J. <strong>and</strong> BALKWILL, K. 1998. A preliminary analysis <strong>of</strong> distribution<br />

patterns in a large, pantropical genus, <strong>Barleria</strong> L. (Acanthaceae). Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Biogeography 25: 95-110<br />

BALKWILL, M.J., BALKWILL, K. <strong>and</strong> VINCENT, P.L.D. 1990. Systematic studies<br />

in the Acanthaceae: A new species <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> from Natal. South African<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany 56: 571-576<br />

BALUNAS, M.J. <strong>and</strong> KINGHORN, A.D. 2005. Drug discovery from <strong>medicinal</strong><br />

plants. Life Sciences 78: 431-441<br />

BARNEJEE, N. <strong>and</strong> DE LANGHE, E. 1985. A tissue culture technique for rapid<br />

clonal propagation <strong>and</strong> storage under minimal growth conditions <strong>of</strong> Musa<br />

(Banana <strong>and</strong> plantain). Plant Cell Reports 4: 351-354<br />

BAROJA-FERNÁNDEZ, E., AGUIRREOLEA, J., MARTÍNKOVÁ, H., HANUŠ, J.<br />

<strong>and</strong> STRNAD, M. 2002. Aromatic cytokinins in micropropagated potato<br />

plants. Plant Physiology <strong>and</strong> Biochemistry 40: 217–224<br />

139


BASKARAN, P., VELAYUTHAM, P. <strong>and</strong> JAYABALAN, N. 2009. In vitro<br />

regeneration <strong>of</strong> Melothria maderaspatana via indirect organogenesis. In Vitro<br />

Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology – Plant 45: 407–413<br />

BECERRA, D.C., FORERO, A.P. <strong>and</strong> GÓNGORA, G.A. 2004. Age <strong>and</strong><br />

physiological condition <strong>of</strong> donor plants affect in vitro morphogenesis in leaf<br />

explants <strong>of</strong> Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ<br />

Culture 79: 87-90<br />

BEENA, M.R. <strong>and</strong> MARTIN, K.P. 2003. In vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> the rare <strong>medicinal</strong><br />

plant Ceropegia c<strong>and</strong>elabrum L. through somatic embryogenesis. In Vitro<br />

Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology – Plant 39: 510-513<br />

BEENA, M.R., MARTIN, K.P., KIRTI, P.B. <strong>and</strong> HARIHARAN, M. 2003. Rapid in<br />

vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> <strong>medicinal</strong>ly important Ceropegia c<strong>and</strong>elabrum L. Plant<br />

Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ Culture 72: 285-289<br />

BEINSBERGER, S.E.I., VALCKE, R.L.M., DEBLAERE, R.Y., CLIJSTERS,<br />

H.M.M., DE GREEF, J.A. <strong>and</strong> VAN ONCKELEN, H.A. 1991. Effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-DNA ipt gene in Nicotiana<br />

tabacum L. cv. Petit Havana SRI plant cells. Plant <strong>and</strong> Cell Physiology 32:<br />

489-496<br />

BENKIRANE, H., SABOUNJI, K., CHLYAH, A. <strong>and</strong> CHLYAH, H. 2000. Somatic<br />

embryogenesis <strong>and</strong> plant regeneration from fragments <strong>of</strong> immature<br />

inflorescences <strong>and</strong> coleoptiles <strong>of</strong> durum wheat. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ<br />

Culture 61: 107-113<br />

BERENBAUM, F. 2004. COX-3: Fact or fancy? Joint Bone Spine 71: 451-453<br />

BERTIN, P. 2004. Should gastroprotective agents be given with COX-2 inhibitors?<br />

A question worthy <strong>of</strong> scrutiny. Joint Bone Spine 71: 454-456<br />

BOGAERT, I., VAN CAUTER, S., WERBROUCK, S.P.O., <strong>and</strong> DOLEŽAL, K.<br />

2006. New aromatic cytokinins can make the difference. Acta Horticulturae<br />

725: 265-270<br />

140


BOLZANI, V.D.S., IZUMISAWA, C.M., YOUNG, M.C.M., TREVISAN, L.M.V.,<br />

KINGSTON, D.G.I. <strong>and</strong> GUNATILAKA, A.L. 1997. Iridoids fromTocoyena<br />

formosa. Phytochemistry 46: 305–308<br />

BOPANA, N. <strong>and</strong> SAXENA, S. 2008. In vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> a high value<br />

<strong>medicinal</strong> plant: Asparagus racemosus Willd. In Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong><br />

Developmental Biology – Plant 44: 525-532<br />

BRANDON, P.C. 1967. Temperature features <strong>of</strong> enzymes affecting crassulacean<br />

acid metabolism. Plant Physiology 42: 977-984<br />

BRITTO, S.J., NATARAJAN, E. <strong>and</strong> AROCKIASAMY, D.I. 2003. In vitro<br />

flowering <strong>and</strong> shoot multiplication from nodal explants <strong>of</strong> Ceropegia bulbosa<br />

Roxb. var. bulbosa. Taiwania 48: 106-111<br />

BURDA, S. <strong>and</strong> OLESZEK, W. 2001. Antioxidant <strong>and</strong> antiradical activities <strong>of</strong><br />

flavonoids. Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Food Chemistry 49: 2774-2779<br />

BYEON, S.E., CHUNG, J.Y., LEE, Y.G., KIM, B.H., KIM, K.H. <strong>and</strong> CHO, J.Y.<br />

2008. In vitro <strong>and</strong> in vivo anti-inflammatory effects <strong>of</strong> taheebo, a water extract<br />

from the inner bark <strong>of</strong> Tabebuia avellanedae. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology<br />

119: 145-152<br />

CARTER, P.J., WILKINS, M.B., NIMMO, H.G. <strong>and</strong> FEWSON, C.A. 1995. Effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> temperature on the activity <strong>of</strong> phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase <strong>and</strong> on<br />

the control <strong>of</strong> CO2 fixation in Bryophyllum fedtschenkoi. Planta 196: 375-380<br />

CHEN, C. 1997. Cytokinin biosynthesis <strong>and</strong> interconversion. Physiologia<br />

Plantarum 101: 665-673<br />

CHEN, J.L., BLANC, P., STODDART, C.A., BOGAN, M., ROZHON, E.J.,<br />

PARKINSON, N., YE, Z., COOPER, R., BALICK, M., NANAKORN, W. <strong>and</strong><br />

KERNAN, M.R. 1998. New iridoids from the <strong>medicinal</strong> plant <strong>Barleria</strong> prionitis<br />

with potent activity against respiratory syncytial virus. Journal <strong>of</strong> Natural<br />

Products 61: 1295-1297<br />

141


CHENG, S.H. <strong>and</strong> EDWARDS, G.E. 1991. Influence <strong>of</strong> long photoperiods on plant<br />

development <strong>and</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> crassulacean acid metabolism in<br />

Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Plant Cell Environment 14: 271-278<br />

CHI, Y.S., JONG, H.G., SON, K.H., CHANG, H.W., KANG, S.S. <strong>and</strong> KIM, H.P.<br />

2001. Effects <strong>of</strong> naturally occurring prenylated flavonoids on enzymes<br />

metabolizing arachidonic acid: Cyclooxygenases <strong>and</strong> lipoxygenases.<br />

Biochemical Pharmacology 62: 1185-1191<br />

CHOFFE, K.L., MURCH, S.J. <strong>and</strong> SAXENA, P.K. 2000. Regeneration <strong>of</strong><br />

Echinacea purpurea: Induction <strong>of</strong> root organogenesis from hypocotyl <strong>and</strong><br />

cotyledon explants. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ Culture 62: 227-234<br />

CHOMNAWANG, M.T., SURRASMO, S., NUKOOLKARN, V.S. <strong>and</strong><br />

GRITSANAPAN, W. 2005. Antimicrobial effects <strong>of</strong> Thai <strong>medicinal</strong> plants<br />

against acne-inducing bacteria. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 101: 330-333<br />

CHOMNAWANG, M.T., SURASSMO, S., WONGSARIYA, K. <strong>and</strong><br />

BUNYAPRAPHATSARA, N. 2009. Antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> Thai <strong>medicinal</strong><br />

plants against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Fitoterapia 80:<br />

102–104<br />

CHUNG, Y-C., CHANG, C-T., CHAO, W-W., LIN, C-F. <strong>and</strong> CHOU, S-T. 2002.<br />

Antioxidative activity <strong>and</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> the 50% ethanolic extract from red bean<br />

fermented by Bacillus subtilis IMR-NK1. Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Food<br />

Chemistry 50: 2454-2458<br />

COMPTON, M.E., GRAY, D.J. <strong>and</strong> ELMSTROM, G.W. 1993. A simple protocol<br />

for micropropagating diploid <strong>and</strong> tetraploid watermelon using shoot-tip<br />

explants. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ Culture 33: 211-217<br />

CONDE, P., SOUSA, A., COSTA, A. <strong>and</strong> SANTOS, C. 2008. A protocol for Ulmus<br />

minor Mill. micropropagation <strong>and</strong> acclimatization. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong><br />

Organ Culture 92: 113-119<br />

142


CONSTABEL, F. <strong>and</strong> SHYLUK, J.P. 1994. Initiation, nutrition <strong>and</strong> maintenance<br />

for plant cell <strong>and</strong> tissue cultures. In: Vasil, I.K. <strong>and</strong> Thorpe, A. (eds.), Plant<br />

Cell <strong>and</strong> Tissue Culture, pp 3-15. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht<br />

COS, P., VLIETINCK, A.J., BERGHE, D.V. <strong>and</strong> MAES, L. 2006. Anti-infective<br />

potential <strong>of</strong> natural products: How to develop a stronger in vitro „pro<strong>of</strong>-<strong>of</strong>-<br />

concept‟. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 106: 290-302<br />

CRAGG, C.M., NEWMAN, D.J. <strong>and</strong> SNADER, M. 1997. Natural products in drug<br />

discovery <strong>and</strong> development. Journal <strong>of</strong> Natural Products 60: 52-60<br />

CUI, Y.Y., HAHN, E.J., KOZAI, T. <strong>and</strong> PAEK, K.Y. 2001. Number <strong>of</strong> air<br />

exchanges, sucrose concentration, photosynthetic photon flux, <strong>and</strong><br />

differences in photoperiod <strong>and</strong> dark period temperatures affect growth <strong>of</strong><br />

Rehmannia glutinosa plantlets in vitro. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ Culture<br />

62: 219-226<br />

CUNNINGHAM, A.B. 1993. African <strong>medicinal</strong> plants: setting priorities at the<br />

interface between conservation <strong>and</strong> primary health care. People <strong>and</strong> Plants<br />

Working Paper 1. Paris. UNESCO<br />

DAVIES, P.J. 2004. Regulatory factors in hormone action: Level, location <strong>and</strong><br />

signal transduction. In: Plant Hormones: Biosynthesis, Signal Transduction,<br />

Action! Davies, P.J. (ed.) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The<br />

Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, pp 16-35<br />

DÁVILA-FIGUEROA, C.A., ROSA-CARRILLO, M.D.L.D.L. <strong>and</strong> PÉREZ-<br />

MOLPHE-BALCH, E. 2005. In vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> eight species or<br />

subspecies <strong>of</strong> Turbinicarpus (Cactaceae). In Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong><br />

Developmental Biology – Plant 41: 540-545<br />

DE FÁTIMA, M., MACHADO, P.S. <strong>and</strong> PRIOLI, A.J. 1996. <strong>Micropropagation</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Cereus peruvianus Mill. (Cactaceae) by areole activation. In vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong><br />

Developmental Biology – Plant 32: 199-203<br />

DE KLERK, G.J. 2002. Rooting <strong>of</strong> microcuttings: Theory <strong>and</strong> practice. In Vitro<br />

Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology – Plant 38: 415-422<br />

143


DE KLERK, G.J., BRUGGE, J.T. <strong>and</strong> MARINOVA, S. 1997. Effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

indoleacetic acid, indolebutyric acid <strong>and</strong> naphthaleneacetic acid during<br />

adventitious root formation in vitro in Malus „Jork 9’. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong><br />

Organ Culture 49: 39-44<br />

DE KLERK, G.J., VAN DER KRIEKEN, W. <strong>and</strong> DE JONG, J.C. 1999. The<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> adventitious roots: New concepts, new possibilities. In Vitro<br />

Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology – Plant 35: 189-199<br />

DEBERGH, P. <strong>and</strong> MAENE, L. 1977. Rapid clonal propagation <strong>of</strong> pathogen-free<br />

pelargonium plants starting from shoot tips <strong>and</strong> apical meristem. Acta<br />

Horticulturae 78: 449-454<br />

DEBERGH, P.C. 1991. Acclimatization techniques <strong>of</strong> plants from in vitro. Acta<br />

Horticulturae 289: 291-300<br />

DEBERGH, P.C. <strong>and</strong> MAENE, L.J. 1981. A scheme for commercial propagation<br />

<strong>of</strong> ornamental plants by tissue culture. Scientia Horticulturae 14: 335-345<br />

DEVI, B.C. <strong>and</strong> KAMALAM, M. 2007. In vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> an endangered<br />

<strong>medicinal</strong> plant – Nilgirianthus ciliatus (Nees.) Bremek. Phytomorphology 57:<br />

123-128<br />

DOHI, S., TERASAKI, M. <strong>and</strong> MAKINO, M. 2009. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory<br />

activity <strong>and</strong> chemical composition <strong>of</strong> commercial essential oils. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Food Chemistry 57: 4313-4318<br />

DOLEŽAL, K., POPA, I., KRYŠTOF, V., SPĺCHAL, L., FOJTĺKOVÁ, M., HOLUB,<br />

J., LENOBEL, R., SCHMÜLLING, T. <strong>and</strong> STRNAD, M. 2006. Preparation<br />

<strong>and</strong> biological activity <strong>of</strong> 6-benzylaminopurine derivatives in plants <strong>and</strong><br />

human cancer cells. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 14: 875–884<br />

ECONOMOU, A.S. <strong>and</strong> READ, P.E. 1986. Influence <strong>of</strong> light duration <strong>and</strong><br />

irradiance on micropropagation <strong>of</strong> a hardy deciduous azalea. Journal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

American Society for Horticultural Science 111: 146-149<br />

144


ECONOMOU, A.S. <strong>and</strong> READ, P.E. 1987. Light treatments to improve efficiency<br />

<strong>of</strong> in vitro propagation systems. HortScience 22: 751-754<br />

ELDEEN, I.M.S., ELGORASHI, E.E. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J. 2005. Antibacterial,<br />

anti-inflammatory, anti-cholinesterase <strong>and</strong> mutagenic effects <strong>of</strong> extracts<br />

obtained from some trees used in South African traditional medicine. Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 102: 457-464<br />

ELLMAN, G.L., COURTNEY, K.D., ANDRES, V. <strong>and</strong> FEATHERSTONE, R.M.<br />

1961. A new <strong>and</strong> rapid colorimetric determination <strong>of</strong> acetylcholinesterase<br />

activity. Biochemical Pharmacology 7: 88-95<br />

ELOFF, J.N. 1998a. Which extractant should be used for the screening <strong>and</strong><br />

isolation <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial components from plants? Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Ethnopharmacology 60: 1-8<br />

ELOFF, J.N. 1998b. A sensitive <strong>and</strong> quick microplate method to determine the<br />

minimal inhibitory concentration <strong>of</strong> plant extracts for bacteria. Planta Medica<br />

64: 711-713<br />

ELOFF, J.N. 2004. Quantification the bioactivity <strong>of</strong> plant extracts during screening<br />

<strong>and</strong> bioassay guided fractionation. Phytomedicine 11: 370-371<br />

ENGELS, C., KNÖDLER, M., ZHAO, Y-Y., CARLE, R., GÄNZLE, M.G. <strong>and</strong><br />

SCHIEBER, A. 2009. Antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> gallotannins isolated from<br />

mango (Mangifera indica L.) Kernels. Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Food<br />

Chemistry 57: 7712-7718<br />

EPSTEIN, E. <strong>and</strong> LAVEE, S. 1984. Conversion <strong>of</strong> indole-3-butyric acid to indole-<br />

3-acetic acid by cuttings <strong>of</strong> grapevine (Vitis vinifera) <strong>and</strong> olive (Olea<br />

europea). Plant <strong>and</strong> Cell Physiology 25: 697-703<br />

ESCALONA, M., CEJAS, I., GONZÁLEZ-OLMEDO, J., CAPOTE, I., ROELS, S.,<br />

CAÑAL, M.J., RODRÍGUEZ, R., SANDOVAL, J. <strong>and</strong> DEBERGH, P. 2003.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> meta-topolin on plantain propagation using a temporary<br />

immersion bioreactor. InfoMusa 12: 28-30<br />

145


ETKIN, N.L. 1998. Indigenous patterns <strong>of</strong> conserving biodiversity: pharmacologic<br />

implications. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 63: 233-245<br />

FABRY, W., OKEMO, P.O. <strong>and</strong> ANSORG, R. 1998. Antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> East<br />

African <strong>medicinal</strong> plants. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 60: 79-84<br />

FAISAL, M., SINGH, S. <strong>and</strong> ANIS, M. 2005. In vitro regeneration <strong>and</strong> plant<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> Tylophora indica (Burm. F.) Merrill: petiole callus culture. In<br />

Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology – Plant 41: 511–515<br />

FENNELL, C.W. 2002. Crinum moorei Propagation <strong>and</strong> Secondary Metabolite<br />

Production in vitro. PhD Thesis. University <strong>of</strong> Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South<br />

Africa<br />

FERREIRA, A., PROENÇA, C., SERRALHEIRO, M.L.M. <strong>and</strong> ARAÚJO, M.E.M.<br />

2006. The in vitro screening for acetylcholinesterase inhibition <strong>and</strong><br />

antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>medicinal</strong> plants from Portugal. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Ethnopharmacology 108: 31-37<br />

FIORUCCI, S., MELI, R., BUCCI, M. <strong>and</strong> CIRINO, G. 2001. Dual inhibitors <strong>of</strong><br />

cyclooxygenase <strong>and</strong> 5-lipoxygenase. A new avenue in anti-inflammatory<br />

therapy? Biochemical Pharmacology 62: 1433-1438<br />

FOGAÇA, C.M. <strong>and</strong> FETT-NETO, A.G. 2005. Role <strong>of</strong> auxin <strong>and</strong> its modulators in<br />

the adventitious rooting <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus species differing in recalcitrance. Plant<br />

Growth Regulation 45: 1–10<br />

FRIEMERT, V., HEININGER, D., KLUGE, M. <strong>and</strong> ZIEGLER, H. 1988.<br />

Temperature effects on malic-acid efflux from the vacuoles <strong>and</strong> on the<br />

carboxylation pathways in crassulacean–acid–metabolism plants. Planta 174:<br />

453-461<br />

FRÖLICH, J.C. 1997. A classification <strong>of</strong> NSAIDs according to the relative inhibition<br />

<strong>of</strong> cyclooxygenase isoenzymes. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 18: 30-<br />

34<br />

146


FUJIWARA, K., KOZAI, T. <strong>and</strong> WATANABE, I. 1987. Fundamental studies on<br />

environments in plant tissue culture vessels. (3) Measurements <strong>of</strong> carbon<br />

dioxide gas concentration in closed vessels containing tissue cultured<br />

plantlets <strong>and</strong> estimates <strong>of</strong> net photosynthetic rates <strong>of</strong> the plantlets. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Agricultural Meteorology 43: 21-30<br />

FUNATOGAWA, K., HAYASHI, S., SHIMOMURA, H., YOSHIDA, T., HATANO,<br />

T., ITO, H. <strong>and</strong> HIRAI, Y. 2004. Antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> hydolyzable tannins<br />

derived from <strong>medicinal</strong> plants against Helicobacter pylori. Microbiology <strong>and</strong><br />

Immunology 48: 251-261<br />

GABA, V.P. 2005. Plant growth regulators in plant tissue culture <strong>and</strong><br />

development. In: Trigiano, R.N. <strong>and</strong> Gray, D.J. (eds) Plant Development <strong>and</strong><br />

Biotechnology. CRC Press, USA, pp 87-99<br />

GAMBORG, O.L., MILLER, R.A. <strong>and</strong> OJIMA, K. 1968. Nutrient requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

suspension cultures <strong>of</strong> soybean root cells. Experimental Cell Research 50:<br />

151-158<br />

GARCIA, D., LEIRO, J., DELGADO, R., SANMARTIN, M.L. <strong>and</strong> UBEIRA, F.M.,<br />

2003. Mangifera indica L. extract (Vimang) <strong>and</strong> mangiferin modulate mouse<br />

humoral immune responses. Phytotherapy Research 17: 1182-1187<br />

GARCÍA-SAUCEDO, P.A., VALDEZ-MORALES, M., VALVERDE, M.E., CRUZ-<br />

HERNÁNDEZ, A. <strong>and</strong> PARADES-LÓPEZ, O. 2005. Plant regeneration <strong>of</strong><br />

three Opuntia genotypes used as human food. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ<br />

Culture 80: 215-219<br />

GASPAR, T., KEVERS, C., PENEL, C., GREPPIN, H., REID, D.M. <strong>and</strong> THORPE,<br />

T.A. 1996. Plant hormones <strong>and</strong> plant growth regulators in plant tissue<br />

culture. In Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology – Plant 32: 272-289<br />

GILL, M.I.S., SINGH, Z., DHILLON, B.S. <strong>and</strong> GOSAL, S.S. 1995. Somatic<br />

embryogenesis <strong>and</strong> plantlet regeneration in m<strong>and</strong>arin (Citrus reticulata<br />

Blanco). Scientia Horticulturae 63: 167-174<br />

147


GIRIDHAR, P., GURURAJ, H.B. <strong>and</strong> RAVISHANKAR, G.A. 2005. In vitro shoot<br />

multiplication through shoot tip cultures <strong>of</strong> Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn.,<br />

a threatened plant endemic to southern India. In Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong><br />

Developmental Biology – Plant 41: 77–80<br />

GIRIDHAR, P., KUMAR, V. <strong>and</strong> RAVISHANKAR, G.A. 2004. Somatic<br />

embryogenesis, organogenesis, <strong>and</strong> regeneration from leaf callus culture <strong>of</strong><br />

Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn., an endangered shrub. In Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong><br />

Developmental Biology – Plant 40: 567–571<br />

GIRIJA, S., GANAPATHI, A. <strong>and</strong> VENGADESAN, G. 1999. <strong>Micropropagation</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Cross<strong>and</strong>ra infundibuliformis (L.) Nees. Scientia Horticulturae 82: 331-337<br />

GIULIETTI, A.M. <strong>and</strong> ERTOLA, R.J. 1999. Biotechnological strategies for<br />

production <strong>of</strong> plants <strong>and</strong> secondary metabolites <strong>of</strong> pharmaceutical interest.<br />

Acta Horticulturae 502: 269-280<br />

GOGATE, S.S. <strong>and</strong> NADGAUDA, R.S. 2003. Direct induction <strong>of</strong> somatic<br />

embryogenesis from immature zygotic embryo <strong>of</strong> cashewnut (Anacardium<br />

occidentale L.). Scientia Horticulturae 97: 75-82<br />

GOMES, F.L.A.F., HEREDIA, F.F., SILVA P.B., FACÓ, O. <strong>and</strong> CAMPOS, F.A.P.<br />

2006. Somatic embryogenesis <strong>and</strong> plant regeneration in Opuntia ficus-indica<br />

(L.) Mill. (Cactaceae). Scientia Horticulturae 108: 15–21<br />

GUINAND, Y. <strong>and</strong> LEMESSA, D. 2000. Wild-food plants in southern Ethiopia:<br />

Reflections on the role <strong>of</strong> „famine-foods‟ at a time <strong>of</strong> drought. Accessed at<br />

http://www.ocha-eth.org/Archive/DownloadableReports/famp0300.pdf.<br />

Accessed on 22 April 2009<br />

HAAG-BERRURIER, M., KUBALLA, B. <strong>and</strong> ANTON, R. 1978. Dosage des<br />

glucoiridoïdes totaux dans la racine d’Harpagophytum procumbens DC.<br />

Plantes Médicinales et Phytothérapie 12: 197-206<br />

HANSEN, C.E., MEINS F., JR. <strong>and</strong> AEBI, R. 1987. Hormonal regulation <strong>of</strong> zeatin-<br />

riboside accumulation by cultured tobacco cells. Planta 172: 520-525<br />

148


HASEGAWA, P.M., MURASHIGE, T. <strong>and</strong> TAKATORI, F.H. 1973. Propagation <strong>of</strong><br />

asparagus through shoot apex culture II. Light <strong>and</strong> temperature<br />

requirements, transplantability <strong>of</strong> plants, <strong>and</strong> cyto-histological characteristics.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> the American Society for Horticultural Science 98: 143-148<br />

HASSAS-ROUDSARI, M., CHANG, P.R., PEGG, R.B. <strong>and</strong> TYLER, R.T. 2009.<br />

Antioxidant capacity <strong>of</strong> bioactives extracted from canola meal by subcritical<br />

water, ethanolic <strong>and</strong> hot water extraction. Food Chemistry 114: 717-726<br />

HAVSTEEN, B.H. 2002. The biochemistry <strong>and</strong> medical significance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

flavonoids. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 96: 67-202<br />

HAZARIKA, B.N. 2003. Acclimatization <strong>of</strong> tissue-cultured plants. Current Science<br />

85: 1704-1712<br />

HENRY, G.E., MOMIN, R.A., NAIR, M.G. <strong>and</strong> DEWITT, D.L. 2002. Antioxidant<br />

<strong>and</strong> cyclooxygenase activities <strong>of</strong> fatty acids found in food. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Food Chemistry 50: 2231-2234<br />

HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1996. Red data list <strong>of</strong> southern African plants. Strelitzia 4.<br />

117pp<br />

HODGKISS, R.J. 2004. Accessed at http://www.succulent-plant.com/acult.html.<br />

Aceessed on 20 February 2007<br />

HOSTETTMAN, K. <strong>and</strong> MARSTON, A. 2002. Twenty years <strong>of</strong> research into<br />

<strong>medicinal</strong> plants: Results <strong>and</strong> perspectives. Phytochemistry Reviews 1: 275-<br />

285<br />

HOUGHTON, P.J., HOWES, M.-J. LEE, C.C. <strong>and</strong> STEVENTON, G. 2007. Uses<br />

<strong>and</strong> abuses <strong>of</strong> in vitro tests in ethnopharmacology: Visualizing an elephant.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 110: 391-400<br />

HOWES, M-J.R. <strong>and</strong> HOUGHTON, P.J. 2003. Plants used in Chinese <strong>and</strong> Indian<br />

traditional medicine for improvement <strong>of</strong> memory <strong>and</strong> cognitive function.<br />

Pharmacology, Biochemistry <strong>and</strong> Behavior 75: 513–527<br />

149


HUANG, D., OU, B. <strong>and</strong> PRIOR, R.L. 2005. The chemistry behind antioxidant<br />

capacity assays. Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Food Chemistry 53: 1841-1856<br />

HUTCHINGS, A., SCOTT, A.H., LEWIS G. <strong>and</strong> CUNNINGHAM, A.B. 1996. Zulu<br />

Medicinal Plants. An Inventory. University <strong>of</strong> Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg.<br />

South Africa<br />

HYNDMAN, S.E., HASEGAWA, P.M. <strong>and</strong> BRESSAN, R.A. 1982. Stimulation <strong>of</strong><br />

root initiation from cultured rose shoots through the use <strong>of</strong> reduced<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> mineral salts. HortScience 17: 82-83<br />

IAPICHINO, G. <strong>and</strong> AIRÒ, M. 2008. <strong>Micropropagation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Metrosideros excelsa. In<br />

Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology – Plant 44: 330-337<br />

ISLAM, M.T., DEMBELE, D.P. <strong>and</strong> KELLER, E.R.J. 2005. Influence <strong>of</strong> explant,<br />

temperature <strong>and</strong> different culture vessels on in vitro culture for germplasm<br />

maintenance <strong>of</strong> four mint accessions. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ Culture<br />

81: 123-130<br />

JÄGER, A.K. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J. 2000. The need for cultivation <strong>of</strong> <strong>medicinal</strong><br />

plants in southern Africa. Outlook on Agriculture 29: 283-284<br />

JÄGER, A.K., HUTCHINGS, A. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J. 1996. Screening <strong>of</strong> Zulu<br />

<strong>medicinal</strong> plants for prostagl<strong>and</strong>in-synthesis inhibitors. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Ethnopharmacology 52: 95-100<br />

JAYAPAUL, K., KAVI KISHOR, P.B. <strong>and</strong> JANARDHAN REDDY, K. 2005.<br />

Production <strong>of</strong> pyrroloquinazoline alkaloid from leaf <strong>and</strong> petiole-derived callus<br />

cultures <strong>of</strong> Adhatoda zeylanica. In Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology<br />

– Plant 41: 682–685<br />

JO, E.A., TEWARI, R.K., HAHN, E.J. <strong>and</strong> PAEK, K.Y. 2008. Effect <strong>of</strong> photoperiod<br />

<strong>and</strong> light intensity on in vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> Alocasia amazonica. Plant<br />

Biotechnology Reports 2: 207-212<br />

150


JONFIA-ESSIEN, W.A., WEST, G., ALDERSON, P.G. <strong>and</strong> TUCKER, G. 2008.<br />

Phenolic content <strong>and</strong> antioxidant capacity <strong>of</strong> hybrid variety cocoa beans.<br />

Food Chemistry 108: 1155–1159<br />

KAMADA, H., TACHIKAWA, Y., SAITOU, T. <strong>and</strong> HARADA, H. 1995. Effects <strong>of</strong><br />

light <strong>and</strong> growth regulators on adventitious bud in horseradish (Armoracia<br />

rusticana). Plant Cell Reports 14: 611-615<br />

KAMĺNEK, M. MOTYKA, V. <strong>and</strong> VAŇKOVÁ, R. 1997. Regulation <strong>of</strong> cytokinin<br />

content in plant cells. Physiologia Plantarum 101: 689-700<br />

KAMĺNEK, M., PAČES, V., CORSE, J. <strong>and</strong> CHALLICE, J.S. 1979. Effects <strong>of</strong><br />

stereospecific hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> N 6 -(Δ 2 -isopentenyl)adenosine on cytokinin<br />

activity. Planta 145 : 239-243<br />

KAMĺNEK, M., VANĚK, T. <strong>and</strong> MOTYKA, V. 1987a. Cytokinin activities <strong>of</strong> N 6 -<br />

benzyladenosine derivatives hydroxylated on the side-chain phenyl ring.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Growth Regulation 6: 113-120<br />

KAMĺNEK, M., VANÉK, T., KALENDOVÁ-KULASOVÁ, A. <strong>and</strong> PILAR, J. 1987b.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> two cytokinins on production <strong>of</strong> stem cuttings by stock plants <strong>of</strong><br />

Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd. <strong>and</strong> Gerbera jamesonii Hook. Scientia<br />

Horticulturae 33: 281-289<br />

KANCHANAPOOM, T., KASAI, R. <strong>and</strong> YAMASAKI, K. 2001. Iridoid glucosides<br />

from <strong>Barleria</strong> lupulina. Phytochemistry 58: 337-341<br />

KANCHANAPOOM, T., NOIARSA, P., RUCHIRAWAT, S., KASAI, R. <strong>and</strong><br />

OTSUKA, H. 2004. Phenylethanoid <strong>and</strong> iridoid glycosides from the Thai<br />

<strong>medicinal</strong> plant, <strong>Barleria</strong> strigosa. Chemical <strong>and</strong> Pharmaceutical Bulletin 52:<br />

612-614<br />

KATSUBE, T., TABATA, H., OHTA, Y., YAMASAKI, Y., ANUURAD, E.,<br />

SHIWAKU, K. <strong>and</strong> YAMANE, Y. 2004. Screening for antioxidant activity in<br />

edible plant products: Comparison <strong>of</strong> low-density lipoprotein oxidation assay,<br />

DPPH radical scavenging assay, <strong>and</strong> Folin-Ciocalteu assay. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Food Chemistry 52: 2391-2396<br />

151


KIRANMAI, C., ARUNA, V., KARUPPUSAMY, S. <strong>and</strong> PULLAIAH, T. 2007. In<br />

vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> Pergularia daemia (Forsk.) Chiov. Plant Cell<br />

Biotechnology <strong>and</strong> Molecular Biology 8: 67-72<br />

KOMALAVALLI, N. <strong>and</strong> RAO, M.V. 2000. In vitro micropropagation <strong>of</strong> Gymnema<br />

sylvestre – a multipurpose <strong>medicinal</strong> plant. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ<br />

Culture 61: 97-105<br />

KONTTINEN, Y.T., KEMPPINEN, P., SEGERBERG, M., HUKKANEN, M.,<br />

REES, R., SANTAVIRTA, S., SORSA, T., PERTOVAARA, A. <strong>and</strong> POLAK,<br />

J.M. 1994. Peripheral <strong>and</strong> spinal neural mechanisms in arthritis, with<br />

particular reference to treatment <strong>of</strong> inflammation <strong>and</strong> pain. Arthritis <strong>and</strong><br />

Rheumatism 37: 965-982<br />

KOSMULALAGE, K.S., ZAHID, S., UDENIGWE, C.C., AKHTAR, S., ATA, A.,<br />

<strong>and</strong> SAMARASEKERA, R. 2007. Glutathione S-transferase,<br />

acetylcholinesterase inhibitory <strong>and</strong> antibacterial activities <strong>of</strong> chemical<br />

constituents <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> prionitis. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 62b: 580-586<br />

KOZAI, T., KUBOTA, C. <strong>and</strong> JEONG, B.R. 1997. Environmental control for the<br />

large-scale production <strong>of</strong> plants through in vitro techniques. Plant Cell, Tissue<br />

<strong>and</strong> Organ Culture 51: 49-56<br />

KOZAI, T., WATANABE, K. <strong>and</strong> JEONG, B.R. 1995. Stem elongation <strong>and</strong> growth<br />

<strong>of</strong> Solanum tuberosum L. in vitro in response to photosynthetic photon flux,<br />

photoperiod <strong>and</strong> difference in photoperiod <strong>and</strong> dark period temperatures.<br />

Scientia Horticulturae 64: 1-9<br />

KOZOMARA, B., VINTERHALTER, B., RADOJEVIĆ, L.J. <strong>and</strong> VINTERHALTER,<br />

D. 2008. In vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> Chimonanthus praecox (L.), a winter<br />

flowering ornamental shrub. In Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology –<br />

Plant 44: 142-147<br />

KUBALÁKOVÁ, M., <strong>and</strong> STRNAD, M. 1992. The effects <strong>of</strong> aromatic cytokinins<br />

(populins) on micropropagation <strong>and</strong> regeneration <strong>of</strong> sugar beet in vitro.<br />

Biologia Plantarum 34: 578-579<br />

152


KUDA, T., TSUNECKAWA, M., GOTO, H. <strong>and</strong> ARAKI, Y. 2005. Antioxidant<br />

<strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> four edible algae harvested in the Noto Peninsula, Japan.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Food Composition <strong>and</strong> Analysis 18: 625–633<br />

KUKLCZANKA, K., KLIMASZEWSKA, K. <strong>and</strong> PLUTA, H. 1977. Regeneration <strong>of</strong><br />

entire plants <strong>of</strong> Peperomia sc<strong>and</strong>ens Ruiz. from different parts <strong>of</strong> leaves in<br />

vitro. Acta Horticulturae 78: 365-371<br />

LALOUE, M. 1977. Cytokinins: 7-glucosylation is not a prerequisite <strong>of</strong> the<br />

expression <strong>of</strong> their biological activity. Planta 134: 273-275<br />

LETHAM, D.S. <strong>and</strong> GOLLNOW, B.I. 1985. Regulators <strong>of</strong> cell division in plant<br />

tissues. XXX. Cytokinin metabolism in relation to radish cotyledon expansion<br />

<strong>and</strong> senescence. Plant Growth Regulation 14: 129- 145<br />

LETHAM, D.S. <strong>and</strong> PALNI, L.M.S. 1983. The biosynthesis <strong>and</strong> metabolism <strong>of</strong><br />

cytokinins. Annual Review <strong>of</strong> Plant Physiology 34: 163-197<br />

LEVIEILLE, G. <strong>and</strong> WILSON, G. 2002. In vitro propagation <strong>and</strong> iridoid analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>medicinal</strong> species Harpagophytum procumbens <strong>and</strong> H. zeyheri. Plant<br />

Cell Reports 21: 220-225<br />

LI, R.W., LIN, G.D., LEACH, D.N., WATERMAN, P.G. <strong>and</strong> MYERS, S.P. 2006.<br />

Inhibition <strong>of</strong> COXs <strong>and</strong> 5-LOX <strong>and</strong> activation <strong>of</strong> PPARs by Australian<br />

Clematis species (Rannunculaceae). Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 104:<br />

138-143<br />

LIEDE-SCHUMANN, S. <strong>and</strong> MEVE, U. 2006. The Genera <strong>of</strong> Asclepiadoideae,<br />

Secamonoideae <strong>and</strong> Periplocoideae (Apocynaceae) Descriptions,<br />

Illustrations, Identification <strong>and</strong> Information Retrieval: 21st September 2000.<br />

Accessed at http://www.unibayreuth.de/departments/planta2/research/<br />

databases/delta_aa/www/hernia.htm. Accessed on 20 February 2007<br />

LIN, Q., ABE, S., NOSE, A., SUNAMI, A. <strong>and</strong> KAWAMITSU, Y. 2006. Effects <strong>of</strong><br />

high night temperature on crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM)<br />

photosynthesis <strong>of</strong> Kalanchoë pinnata <strong>and</strong> Ananas comosus. Plant Production<br />

Science 9: 10-19<br />

153


LITZ, R.E. <strong>and</strong> CANOVER, R.A. 1981. Effect <strong>of</strong> sex type, season <strong>and</strong> other<br />

factors on in vitro establishment <strong>and</strong> culture <strong>of</strong> Carica papaya L. explants.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> the American Society for Horticultural Science 106: 792-794<br />

LIU, J.H. <strong>and</strong> REID, D.M. 1992. Auxin <strong>and</strong> ethylene-stimulated adventitious<br />

rooting in relation to tissue sensitivity to auxin <strong>and</strong> ethylene production in<br />

sunflower hypocotyls. Journal <strong>of</strong> Experimental Botany 43: 1191-1198<br />

LIU, X. <strong>and</strong> PIJUT, P.M. 2008. Plant regeneration from in vitro leaves <strong>of</strong> mature<br />

black cherry (Prunus serotina). Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ Culture 94: 113-<br />

123<br />

LONG, C. 2005. Swazil<strong>and</strong>‟s flora-siSwati names <strong>and</strong> uses. Accessed at<br />

http://www.sntc.org.sz/flora/clusagelist.asp?uid=2&pg=26. Accessed on 07<br />

March 2007<br />

LÓPEZ, S., BASTIDA, J., VILADOMAT, F. <strong>and</strong> CODINA, C. 2002.<br />

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity <strong>of</strong> some Amaryllidaceae alkaloids <strong>and</strong><br />

Narcissus extracts. Life Sciences 71: 2521–2529<br />

LÜTTGE, U. 2004. Ecophysiology <strong>of</strong> crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM).<br />

Annals <strong>of</strong> Botany 93: 629-652<br />

LÜTTGE, U. <strong>and</strong> BECK, F. 1992. Endogenous rhythms <strong>and</strong> chaos in<br />

crassulacean acid metabolism. Planta 188:28-38<br />

MACAULAY, S. <strong>and</strong> BLACKBURN, D. 2002. Selective COX-2 inhibitors for<br />

patients with arthritis: Are they safer than traditional nonsteroidal anti-<br />

inflammatory drugs? Canadian Pharmacists Journal 135: 30-34<br />

MACHÁČKOVA, I., KREKULE, J. <strong>and</strong> EDER, J. 1992. Changes in cytokinin level<br />

<strong>and</strong> distribution during photoperiodic flower induction in Chenopodium<br />

species. Biologia Plantarum 34: 580<br />

MAENE, L.M. <strong>and</strong> DEBERGH, P.C. 1983. Rooting <strong>of</strong> tissue cultured plants under<br />

in vivo conditions. Acta Horticulturae 131: 201-208<br />

154


MAKHOLELA, T., VAN DER BANK, H., <strong>and</strong> BALKWILL, K. 2003. A preliminary<br />

study <strong>of</strong> allozyme variation in three rare <strong>and</strong> restricted endemic <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

<strong>greenii</strong> (Acanthaceae) populations. Biochemical Systematics <strong>and</strong> Ecology 31:<br />

141-154<br />

MAKKAR, H.P.S. 2000. Quantification <strong>of</strong> tannins in tree foliage: A laboratory<br />

manual for the FAO/IAEA co-ordinated research project on „Use <strong>of</strong> Nuclear<br />

<strong>and</strong> Related Techniques to Develop Simple Tannin Assays for Predicting <strong>and</strong><br />

Improving the Safety <strong>and</strong> Efficiency <strong>of</strong> Feeding Ruminants on Tanniniferous<br />

Tree Foliage‟. Joint FAO/IAEA Division <strong>of</strong> Nuclear Techniques in Food <strong>and</strong><br />

Agriculture, Vienna, Austria<br />

MALÁ, J., MÁCHOVÁ, P., CVRČKOVÁ, H., KARADY, M., NOVÁK, O., MIKULĺK,<br />

J., HAUSEROVÁ, E., GREPLOVÁ, J., STRNAD, M. <strong>and</strong> DOLEŽAL, K.<br />

2009. <strong>Micropropagation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Wild Service Tree (Sorbus torminalis [L.] Crantz):<br />

The regulative role <strong>of</strong> different aromatic cytokinins during organogenesis.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Growth Regulation doi: 10.1007/s00344-009-9099-2<br />

MALDA, G., SUZÁN, H. <strong>and</strong> BACKHAUS, R. 1999. In vitro culture as a potential<br />

method for the conservation <strong>of</strong> endangered plants possessing crassulacean<br />

acid metabolism. Scientia Horticulturae 81: 71-87<br />

MANJULA, S., JOB, A. <strong>and</strong> NAIR, G.M. 2000. Somatic embryogenesis from leaf<br />

derived callus <strong>of</strong> Tylophora indica (Burm. F.) Merrill. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Experimental Biology 38: 1069-1072<br />

MARCUCCI, M.C., FERRERES, F., GARCĺA-VIGUERA, C., BANKOVA, V.S., DE<br />

CASTRO, S.L., DANTAS, A.P., VALENTE, P.H.M. <strong>and</strong> PAULINO, N. 2001.<br />

Phenolic compounds from Brazilian propolis with pharmacological activities.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 74: 105-112<br />

MAREGESI, S.M., PIETERS, L., NGASSAPA, O.D., APERS, S.,<br />

VINGERHOETS, R., COS, P., VANDEN BERGHE, D.A. <strong>and</strong> VLIETINCK,<br />

A.J. 2008. Screening <strong>of</strong> some Tanzanian <strong>medicinal</strong> plants from Bunda district<br />

for antibacterial, antifungal <strong>and</strong> antiviral activities. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Ethnopharmacology 119: 58-66<br />

155


MARKS, T.R. <strong>and</strong> SIMPSON, S.E. 1994. Factors affecting shoot development in<br />

apically dominant Acer cultivars in vitro. Journal <strong>of</strong> Horticultural Science 69:<br />

543-551<br />

MARTIN, K.P. 2002. Rapid propagation <strong>of</strong> Holostemma ada-kodien Schult., a rare<br />

<strong>medicinal</strong> plant, through axillary bud multiplication <strong>and</strong> indirect<br />

organogenesis. Plant Cell Reports 21: 112-117<br />

MARTIN, K.P. 2003. Plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis on<br />

Holostemma ada-kodien, a rare <strong>medicinal</strong> plant. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong><br />

Organ Culture 72: 79-82<br />

MARTIN, K.P. 2004a. Plant regeneration protocol <strong>of</strong> <strong>medicinal</strong>ly important<br />

Andrographis paniculata (Burm. F.) Wallich Ex Nees via somatic<br />

embyogenesis. In Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology – Plant 40: 204-<br />

209<br />

MARTIN, K.P. 2004b. Benzyladenine induced somatic embryogenesis <strong>and</strong> plant<br />

regeneration <strong>of</strong> Leptadenia reticulata. Biologia Plantarum 48: 285-288<br />

MARTIN, C.E., LOESCHEN, V.S. <strong>and</strong> COKE, L.B. 1990. Crassulacean acid<br />

metabolism in selected terrestrial succulents in southeastern Jamaica,<br />

including two species in the Commelinaceae. Oecologia 84: 99-102<br />

MASOKO, P., PICARD, J. <strong>and</strong> ELOFF, J.N. 2007. The antifungal activity <strong>of</strong><br />

twenty-four southern Africa Combretum species (Combretaceae). South<br />

African Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany 73: 173-183<br />

MATU, E.N. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J., 2003. Antibacterial <strong>and</strong> anti-inflammatory<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> some plants used for <strong>medicinal</strong> purposes in Kenya. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Ethnopharmacology 87: 35-41<br />

MIDDLETON, E. JR., KANDASWAMI. C. <strong>and</strong> THEOHARIDES, T.C. 2000. The<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> plant flavonoids on mammalian cells: Implications for inflammation,<br />

heart disease, <strong>and</strong> cancer. Pharmacological Reviews 52: 673–751<br />

156


MISRA, N., MISRA, P., DATTA, S.K. <strong>and</strong> MEHROTRA, S. 2005. In vitro<br />

biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> antioxidants from Hemidesmus indicus R. Br. cultures. In<br />

Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology – Plant 41: 285–290<br />

MOISE, P.A. <strong>and</strong> SCHENTAG, J.J. 2000. Vancomycin treatment failures in<br />

Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections. International<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Antimicrobial Agents 16: S31–S34<br />

MONCOUSIN, C. 1991. Rooting <strong>of</strong> microcuttings: general aspects. Acta<br />

Horticulturae 289: 301-310<br />

MOON, J-K. <strong>and</strong> SHIBAMOTO, T. 2009. Antioxidant assays for plant <strong>and</strong> food<br />

components. Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Food Chemistry 57: 1655-1666<br />

MORINI, S., TRINCI, M. <strong>and</strong> ZACCHINI, M. 1991. Effect <strong>of</strong> different photoperiods<br />

on in vitro growth <strong>of</strong> Mr.S.2/5 plum rootstock. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ<br />

Culture 25: 141-145<br />

MOTSEI, M.L., LINDSEY, K.L., VAN STADEN, J. <strong>and</strong> JÄGER, A.K. 2003.<br />

Screening <strong>of</strong> traditionally used South African plants for antifungal activity<br />

against C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 86: 235–241<br />

MUDAY, G.K. <strong>and</strong> DELONG, A. 2001. Polar auxin transport: controlling where<br />

<strong>and</strong> how much. Trends in Plant Science 6: 535-542<br />

MURASHIGE, T. 1974. Plant propagation through tissue cultures. Annual Review<br />

<strong>of</strong> Plant Physiology 25: 135-166<br />

MURASHIGE, T. 1978. Principles <strong>of</strong> rapid propagation. In : Propagation <strong>of</strong> Higher<br />

Plants through Tissue Culture. A Bridge between Research <strong>and</strong> Application.<br />

Hughes, K.W., Henke, R. <strong>and</strong> Constantin, M. (eds.) University <strong>of</strong> Tennessee<br />

Symposium Proceedings, pp 14-24<br />

MURASHIGE, T. <strong>and</strong> SKOOG, F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth <strong>and</strong><br />

bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473-497<br />

NAIR, A.K., DILIP, N.D. <strong>and</strong> SUBHASH, P.S. 2007. High-frequency in vitro<br />

flowering in six species <strong>of</strong> Ceropegia. Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Biology 50: 374-377<br />

157


NDAWONDE, B.G., ZOBOLO, A.M., DLAMINI, E.T. <strong>and</strong> SIEBERT, S.J. 2007. A<br />

survey <strong>of</strong> plants sold by traders at Zulul<strong>and</strong> muthi markets, with a view to<br />

selecting popular plant species for propagation in communal gardens. African<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Range & Forage Science 24: 103-107<br />

NDHLALA, A.R., KASIYAMHURU, A., MUPURE, C., CHITINDINGU, K.,<br />

BENHURA, M.A. <strong>and</strong> MUCHUWETI, M. 2007. Phenolic composition <strong>of</strong><br />

Flacourtia indica, Opuntia megacantha <strong>and</strong> Sclerocarya birrea. Food<br />

Chemistry 103: 82-87<br />

NEZBEDOVÁ, L., HESSE, M., DUŠEK, J. <strong>and</strong> WERNER, C. 1999. Chemical<br />

potential <strong>of</strong> Aphel<strong>and</strong>ra sp. cell cultures. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ<br />

Culture 58: 133–140<br />

NGEMENYA, M.N., MBAH, J.A., TANE, P. <strong>and</strong> TITANJI, V.P.K. 2006.<br />

Antibacterial effects <strong>of</strong> some Cameroonian <strong>medicinal</strong> plants against common<br />

pathogenic bacteria. African Journal <strong>of</strong> Traditional, Complementary <strong>and</strong><br />

Alternative Medicines 3: 84-93<br />

NHUT, D.T., AN, T.T.T., HUONG, N.T.D., DON, N.T., HAI, N.T., THIEN, N.Q. <strong>and</strong><br />

VU, N.H. 2007. Effect <strong>of</strong> genotype, explant size, position, <strong>and</strong> culture medium<br />

on shoot regeneration <strong>of</strong> Gerbera jamesonii by receptacle transverse thin cell<br />

layer culture. Scientia Horticulturae 111: 146-151<br />

NHUT, D.T., TEIXEIRA DA SILVA, J.A., HUYEN, P.X. <strong>and</strong> PAEK, K.Y. 2004.The<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> explant source on regeneration <strong>and</strong> micropropagation <strong>of</strong><br />

Gladiolus by liquid shake culture. Scientia Horticulturae 102: 407-414<br />

NIEMETZ, R. <strong>and</strong> GROSS, G.G. 2005. Enzymology <strong>of</strong> gallotannin <strong>and</strong> elagitannin<br />

biosynthesis. Phytochemistry 66: 2001-2011<br />

NIGRA, H.M., CASO, O.H. <strong>and</strong> GIULIETTI, A.M. 1987. Production <strong>of</strong> solasodine<br />

by calli from different parts <strong>of</strong> Solanum eleagnifolium Cav. plants. Plant Cell<br />

Reports 6: 135-137<br />

158


NIKAM, T.D. <strong>and</strong> SAVANT, R.S. 2009. Multiple shoot regeneration <strong>and</strong> alkaloid<br />

cerpegin accumulation in callus culture <strong>of</strong> Ceropegia juncea Roxb.<br />

Physiology <strong>and</strong> Molecular Biology <strong>of</strong> Plants 15: 71-77<br />

NORDSTRÖM, A-C. <strong>and</strong> ELIASSON, L. 1991. Levels <strong>of</strong> endogenous indole-3-<br />

acetic acid <strong>and</strong> indole-3-acetylaspartic acid during adventitious root formation<br />

in pea cuttings. Physiologia Plantarum 82: 599-605<br />

NORMANLY, J., SLOVIN, J.P. <strong>and</strong> COHEN, J.D. 2004. Hormone biosynthesis,<br />

metabolism <strong>and</strong> its regulation. In: Plant Hormones: Biosynthesis, Signal<br />

Transduction, Action! Davies, P.J. (ed.) Kluwer Academic Publishers,<br />

Dordrecht, The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, pp 36-62<br />

NUNES, E. C., DE CASTILHO, C. V., MORENO, F. N. <strong>and</strong> VIANA, A. M. 2002.<br />

In vitro culture <strong>of</strong> Cedrela fissilis Vellozo (Meliaceae). Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong><br />

Organ Culture 70: 259-268<br />

OKUDA, T. 2005. Systematics <strong>and</strong> health effects <strong>of</strong> chemically distinct tannins in<br />

<strong>medicinal</strong> plants. Phytochemistry 66: 2012-2031<br />

OLIVER, I.B. 1998. Grow Succulents. A Guide to the Species, Cultivation <strong>and</strong><br />

Propagation <strong>of</strong> South African Succulents. National Botanical Institute,<br />

Kristenbosch, South Africa<br />

ORHAN, I., KARTAL, M., ABU-ASAKER, M., ŞENOL, F.S., YILMAZ, G. <strong>and</strong><br />

ŞENER, B. 2009. Free radical scavenging <strong>properties</strong> <strong>and</strong> phenolic<br />

characterization <strong>of</strong> some edible plants. Food Chemistry 114: 276-281<br />

OTHMANI, A., BAYOUDH, C., DRIRA, N., MARRAKCHI, M. <strong>and</strong> TRIFI, M. 2009.<br />

Somatic embryogenesis <strong>and</strong> plant regeneration in date palm Phoenix<br />

dactylifera L., cv. Boufeggous is significantly improved by fine chopping <strong>and</strong><br />

partial dessication <strong>of</strong> embryogenic callus. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ<br />

Culture 97: 71-79<br />

PAN, M.J. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J. 1998. The use <strong>of</strong> charcoal in in vitro culture – A<br />

review. Plant Growth Regulation 26: 155-163<br />

159


PAREEK, A. <strong>and</strong> KOTHARI, S.L. 2003. Direct somatic embryogenesis <strong>and</strong> plant<br />

regeneration from leaf cultures <strong>of</strong> ornamental species <strong>of</strong> Dianthus. Scientia<br />

Horticulturae 98: 449–459<br />

PAREJO, I., VILADOMAT, F., BASTIDA, J., ROSAS-ROMERO, A., FLERLAGE,<br />

N., BURILLO, J. <strong>and</strong> CODINA, C. 2002. Comparison between the radical<br />

scavenging activity <strong>and</strong> antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> six distilled <strong>and</strong> nondistilled<br />

Mediterranean herbs <strong>and</strong> aromatic plants. Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Food<br />

Chemistry 50: 6882-6890<br />

PARKER, C.W., LETHAM, D.S., GOLLNOW, B.I., SUMMONS, R.E., DUKE, C.C.<br />

<strong>and</strong> MACLEOD, J.K. 1978. Regulators <strong>of</strong> cell division in plant tissues XXV.<br />

Metabolism <strong>of</strong> zeatin by lupin seedlings. Planta 142: 239-251<br />

PATERSON, K. <strong>and</strong> ROSE, T.L. 1979. Effects <strong>of</strong> light <strong>and</strong> hormones on<br />

regeneration <strong>of</strong> Crassula argentea from leaves. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany<br />

66: 463-470<br />

PATIL, V.M. 1998. <strong>Micropropagation</strong> studies in Ceropegia spp. In Vitro Cellular<br />

<strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology – Plant 34: 240-243<br />

PATNAIK, J. <strong>and</strong> DEBATA, B.K. 1996. <strong>Micropropagation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Hemidesmus indicus<br />

(L.) R. Br. through axillary bud culture. Plant Cell Reports 15:427-430<br />

PATTANAYAK, S.P. <strong>and</strong> SUNITA, P. 2008. Wound healing, anti-microbial <strong>and</strong><br />

antioxidant potential <strong>of</strong> Dendrophthoe falcata (L.f) Ettingsh. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Ethnopharmacology 120: 241–247<br />

PEIXOTO, P.H.P., SALIMENA, F.R.G., SANTOS, M.D.O., GARCIA, L.D.S.,<br />

PIERRE, P.M.D.O., VICCINI, L.F. <strong>and</strong> OTONI, W.C. 2006. In vitro<br />

propagation <strong>of</strong> endangered Lippia filifolia Mart. <strong>and</strong> Schauer ex Schauer. In<br />

Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology – Plant 42: 558-561<br />

PIERIK, R.L.M. 1987. In vitro Culture <strong>of</strong> Higher Plants. Martinus Nijh<strong>of</strong>f Publishers,<br />

Dordrecht, The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s. 344pp<br />

160


POLYA, G. 2003. Biochemical Targets <strong>of</strong> Plant Bioactive Compounds. A<br />

Pharmacological Reference Guide to Sites <strong>of</strong> Action <strong>and</strong> Biological Effects.<br />

CRC Press, Florida<br />

PORTER, L.J., HRSTICH, L.N. <strong>and</strong> CHAN, B.G. 1986. The conversion <strong>of</strong><br />

procyanidins <strong>and</strong> prodelphinidins to cyanidin <strong>and</strong> delphinidin. Phytochemistry<br />

25, 223–230<br />

PRAKASH, J. 2009. <strong>Micropropagation</strong> <strong>of</strong> ornamental perennials: Progress <strong>and</strong><br />

problems. Acta Horticulturae 812: 289-294<br />

PRAKASH, S. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J. 2007. <strong>Micropropagation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Hoslundia<br />

opposita Vahl – a valuable <strong>medicinal</strong> plant. South African Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany<br />

73: 60-63<br />

PRAKASH, S. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J. 2008. <strong>Micropropagation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Searsia dentata.<br />

In Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology – Plant 44: 338-341<br />

PRAMANIK, T.K. <strong>and</strong> DATTA, S.K. 1986. Plant regeneration <strong>and</strong> ploidy variation<br />

in culture derived plants <strong>of</strong> Asclepias curassavica L. Plant Cell Reports 3:<br />

219- 222<br />

PUROHIT, S.D., DAVE, A. <strong>and</strong> KUKDA, G. 1994. <strong>Micropropagation</strong> <strong>of</strong> safed<br />

musli (Chlorophytum borivilianum), a rare Indian <strong>medicinal</strong> herb. Plant Cell,<br />

Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ Culture 39: 93-96<br />

QUIEROZ, O. 1974. Circadian rhythms <strong>and</strong> metabolic patterns. Annual Review <strong>of</strong><br />

Plant Physiology 25: 115-134<br />

RABE, T. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J. 1997. Antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> South African<br />

plants used for <strong>medicinal</strong> purposes. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 56, 81-87<br />

RAGHUVANSHI, S.S., SRIVASTAVA, A. <strong>and</strong> KESARWANI, R. 1994. In vitro<br />

plant formation from callus cultures <strong>of</strong> Justicea gendarussa. Journal <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />

Botanical Society 73: 127-129<br />

161


RAI, M.K., AKHTAR, N. <strong>and</strong> JAISWAL, V.S. 2007. Somatic embryogenesis <strong>and</strong><br />

plant regeneration in Psidium guajava L. cv. Banarasi local. Scientia<br />

Horticulturae 113: 129-133<br />

RAMPEY, R.A., LECLERE S., KOWALCZYK, M., LJUNG, K., SANDBERG, G.<br />

<strong>and</strong> BARTEL, B. 2004. A family <strong>of</strong> auxin-conjugate hydrolases that<br />

contributes to free indole-3-acetic acid levels during Arabidopsis germination.<br />

Plant Physiology 135: 978-988<br />

RAMULU, D.R., SRI RAMA MURTHY, K. <strong>and</strong> PULLAIAH, T. 2003. Regeneration<br />

<strong>of</strong> plants from root segments derived from aseptic seedlings <strong>of</strong> Hemidesmus<br />

indicus R.Br. Phytomorphology 53: 293-298<br />

RAO, P.S. <strong>and</strong> NARAYANASWAMY, S. 1972. Morphogenetic investigations in<br />

callus cultures <strong>of</strong> Tylophora indica. Physiologia Plantarum 27: 271-276<br />

RATES, S.M.K. 2001. Plants as source <strong>of</strong> drugs. Toxicon 39: 603-613<br />

RAY, P.M. 1958. Destruction <strong>of</strong> auxin. Annual Review <strong>of</strong> Plant Physiology 9: 81-<br />

118<br />

RAZDAN, M.K. 2003. Introduction to Plant Tissue Culture. Science Publishers,<br />

USA. 375pp<br />

READ, P.E. <strong>and</strong> PREECE, J.E. 2009. <strong>Micropropagation</strong> <strong>of</strong> ornamentals: The<br />

wave <strong>of</strong> the future. Acta Horticulturae 812: 51-61<br />

RĺOS, J.L. <strong>and</strong> RECIO, M.C. 2005. Medicinal plants <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial activity.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 100: 80-84<br />

ROBARDS, K., PRENZLER, P.D., TUCKER, G., SWATSITANG, P. <strong>and</strong><br />

GLOVER, W. 1999. Phenolic compounds <strong>and</strong> their role in oxidative<br />

processes in fruits. Food Chemistry 66: 401-436<br />

ROY, A.T. <strong>and</strong> DE, D.N. 1990. Tissue culture <strong>and</strong> plant regeneration from<br />

immature embryo explants <strong>of</strong> Calotropis gigantea (Linn.) R. Br. Plant Cell,<br />

Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ Culture 20: 229–233<br />

162


ROY, A.T., KOUTOULIS, A. <strong>and</strong> DE, D.N. 2000. Cell suspension culture <strong>and</strong><br />

plant regeneration in the latex-producing plant, Calotropis gigantea (Linn.) R.<br />

Br. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ Culture 63: 15–22<br />

RUMBAOA, R.G.O., CORNAGO, D.F. <strong>and</strong> GERONIMO, I.M. 2009. Phenolic<br />

content <strong>and</strong> antioxidant capacity <strong>of</strong> Phillipine sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas)<br />

varieties. Food Chemistry 113: 1133-1138<br />

SALIH, S., WATERWORTH, H. <strong>and</strong> THOMPSON, D.A. 2001. Role <strong>of</strong> plant tissue<br />

cultures in international exchange <strong>and</strong> quarantine <strong>of</strong> germplasm in the United<br />

States <strong>and</strong> Canada. HortScience 36: 1015-1021<br />

SALISBURY F. B. <strong>and</strong> ROSS, C. W. 1992. Plant Physiology. 4th edition.<br />

Wadsworth, Belmont California<br />

SALVI, N.D., GEORGE, L. <strong>and</strong> EAPEN, S. 2002. <strong>Micropropagation</strong> <strong>and</strong> field<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> micropropagated plants <strong>of</strong> turmeric. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong><br />

Organ Culture 68: 143–151<br />

SAMAK, G., SHENOY, R.P., MANJUNATHA, S.M. <strong>and</strong> VINAYAK, K.S. 2009.<br />

Superoxide <strong>and</strong> hydroxyl radical scavenging actions <strong>of</strong> botanical extracts <strong>of</strong><br />

Wagetea spicata. Food Chemistry 115: 631-634<br />

SANBI. 2009. National Red List <strong>of</strong> South African Plants. Accessed at<br />

http://www.sanbi.org/frames/documentsfram.htm (February, 2009). Accessed<br />

on 05 August 2009<br />

SANTAMARIA, J.M. <strong>and</strong> KERSTIENS, G. 1994. The lack <strong>of</strong> control <strong>of</strong> water loss<br />

in micropropagated plants is not related to poor cuticle development.<br />

Physiologia Plantarum 91: 191-195<br />

SANTAMARIA, J.M., DAVIES, W.J. <strong>and</strong> ATKINSON, C.J. 1993. Stomata <strong>of</strong><br />

micropropagated Delphinium plants respond to ABA, CO2, light <strong>and</strong> water<br />

potential, but fail to close fully. Journal <strong>of</strong> Experimental Botany 44: 99-107<br />

SARASAN, V., CRIPPS, R., RAMSAY, M.M., ATHERTON, C., MCMICHEN, M.,<br />

PRENDERGAST, G. <strong>and</strong> ROWNTREE, J.K. 2006. Conservation in vitro <strong>of</strong><br />

163


threatened plants – progress in the past decade. In Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong><br />

Developmental Biology — Plant 42: 206–214<br />

SARASAN, V., SONIYA, E.V. <strong>and</strong> NAIR, G.M. 1994. Regeneration <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />

Sarsaparilla, Hemidesmus indicus R. Br. through organogenesis <strong>and</strong> somatic<br />

embryogenesis. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Experimental Biology 32: 284-287<br />

SATO, T., KWON, O.C., MIYAKE, H., TANIGUCHI, T. <strong>and</strong> MAEDA, E. 1995.<br />

Regeneration <strong>of</strong> plantlets from petiole callus <strong>of</strong> wild viola (Viola patrinii DC.).<br />

Plant Cell Reports 14: 768-772<br />

SAVELEV, S., OKELLO, E., PERRY, N.S.L., WILKINS, R.M. <strong>and</strong> PERRY, E.K.<br />

2003. Synergistic <strong>and</strong> antagonistic interactions <strong>of</strong> anticholinesterase<br />

terpenoids in Salvia lav<strong>and</strong>ulaefolia essential oil. Pharmacology,<br />

Biochemistry <strong>and</strong> Behavior 75: 661-668<br />

SAXENA, S. <strong>and</strong> BHOJWANI, S.S. 1993. In vitro clonal multiplication <strong>of</strong> 4-year-<br />

old plants <strong>of</strong> the bamboo, Dendrocalamus longispathus Kurz. In Vitro Cellular<br />

<strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology – Plant 29: 135-142<br />

SCHENK, R.U. <strong>and</strong> HILDEBRANDT, A.C. 1972. Medium <strong>and</strong> techniques for<br />

induction <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> monocotyledonous <strong>and</strong> dicotyledonous plant cell<br />

cultures. Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany 50: 199-204<br />

SCHIMTZ, R.Y., SKOOG, F., PLAYTIS, A.J. <strong>and</strong> LEONARD, N.J. 1972.<br />

Cytokinins: Synthesis <strong>and</strong> biological activity <strong>of</strong> geometric <strong>and</strong> position<br />

isomers <strong>of</strong> zeatin. Plant Physiology 50: 702-705<br />

SCOTT-SHAW, C.R. 1999. Rare <strong>and</strong> Threatened Plants <strong>of</strong> KwaZulu-Natal <strong>and</strong><br />

Neighboring Regions. KwaZulu-Natal Nature Conservation Science,<br />

Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. 200pp<br />

SERRET, M.D., TRILLAS, M.I., MATAS, J. <strong>and</strong> ARAUS, J.L. 1997. The effect <strong>of</strong><br />

different closure types, light, <strong>and</strong> sucrose concentrations on carbon isotope<br />

composition <strong>and</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> Gardenia jasminoides plantlets during<br />

micropropagation <strong>and</strong> subsequent acclimation ex vitro. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong><br />

Organ Culture 47: 217-230<br />

164


SHAI, L.J., MCGAW, L.J., MASOKO, P. <strong>and</strong> ELOFF, J.N. 2008. Antifungal <strong>and</strong><br />

antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> seven traditionally used South African plant species<br />

active against C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans. South African Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany 74: 677-<br />

684<br />

SHAN, B., CAI, Y-Z., BROOKS, J.D. <strong>and</strong> CORKE, H. 2007. Antibacterial<br />

<strong>properties</strong> <strong>and</strong> major bioactive components <strong>of</strong> cinnamon stick (Cinnamomum<br />

burmannii): Activity against foodborne pathogenic bacteria. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Food Chemistry 55: 5484-5490<br />

SHARMA, M., SOOD, A., NAGAR, P.K., PRAKASH, O. <strong>and</strong> AHUJA, P.S. 1999.<br />

Direct rooting <strong>and</strong> hardening <strong>of</strong> tea microshoots in the field. Plant Cell, Tissue<br />

<strong>and</strong> Organ Culture 58: 111-118<br />

SHARMA, N. <strong>and</strong> CHANDEL, K.P.S. 1992. Effect <strong>of</strong> ascorbic acid on axillary<br />

shoot induction in Tylophora indica (Burm. F.) Merril. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong><br />

Organ Culture 29: 109–113<br />

SHARMA, O.P. <strong>and</strong> BHAT, T.K. 2009. DPPH antioxidant assay revisited. Food<br />

Chemistry 113: 1202-1205<br />

SHYU, Y-S., LIN, J-T., CHANG, Y-T., CHIANG, C-J. <strong>and</strong> YANG, D-J. 2009.<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> antioxidant ability <strong>of</strong> ethanolic extract from dill (Anethum<br />

graveolens L.) flower. Food Chemistry 115: 515–521<br />

SINGH, B., BANI, S., GUPTA, D.K., CHANDAN, B.K., KAUL, A. 2003. Anti-<br />

inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> ‟TAF‟ an active fraction from the plant <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

prionitis Linn. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 85: 187-193<br />

SINGH, B., CHANDAN, B.K., SHARMA, N., SINGH, S., TANEJA, S.C. <strong>and</strong><br />

PRABHAKAR, A. 2004. A novel lead for hepatic disorders from <strong>Barleria</strong><br />

prionitis Linn. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pharmacology 36: 114-115.<br />

SREEKUMAR, S., SEENI, S. <strong>and</strong> PUSHPANGADAN, P. 2000. <strong>Micropropagation</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Hemidesmus indicus for cultivation <strong>and</strong> production <strong>of</strong> 2-hydroxy 4-methoxy<br />

benzaldehyde. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ Culture 62: 211-218<br />

165


SRIVASTAVA, L.M. 2002. Plant Growth <strong>and</strong> Development. Hormones <strong>and</strong><br />

Environment. Academic Press, USA. 772pp<br />

STEINMEYER, J. 2000. Pharmacological basis for the therapy <strong>of</strong> pain <strong>and</strong><br />

inflammation with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Arthritis Research 2:<br />

379-385<br />

STEINMEYER, J. <strong>and</strong> KONTTINEN, Y.T. 2006. Oral treatment options for<br />

degenerative joint disease – presence <strong>and</strong> future. Advanced Drug Delivery<br />

Reviews 58: 168-211<br />

STRNAD, M. 1997. The aromatic cytokinins. Physiologia Plantarum 101: 674-688<br />

STROSSE, H., ANDRE, E., SÁGI, L., SWENNEN, R. <strong>and</strong> PANIS, B. 2008.<br />

Adventitious shoot formation is not inherent to micropropagation <strong>of</strong> banana<br />

as it is in maize. Plant Cell, Tissue <strong>and</strong> Organ Culture 95: 321-332<br />

SUDHA, C.G., KRISHNAN, P.N. <strong>and</strong> PUSHPANGADAN, P. 1998. In vitro<br />

propagation <strong>of</strong> Holostemma annulare (Roxb.) K. Schum., a rare <strong>medicinal</strong><br />

plant. In Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology – Plant 33: 57-63<br />

SUDHA, C.G. <strong>and</strong> SEENI, S. 1994. In vitro multiplication <strong>and</strong> field establishment<br />

<strong>of</strong> Adhatoda beddomei C.B. Clarke, a rare <strong>medicinal</strong> plant. Plant Cell Reports<br />

13: 203-207<br />

SUN, H-Y., CHEN, S-Y., CHANG, S-C., PAN, S.C., SU, C.P. <strong>and</strong> CHEN, Y-C.<br />

2006. Community-onset Escherichia coli <strong>and</strong> Klebsiella pneumoniae<br />

bacteremia: influence <strong>of</strong> health care exposure on antimicrobial susceptibility.<br />

Diagnostic Microbiology <strong>and</strong> Infectious Disease 55: 135–141<br />

SUN, L., HOU, S., WU, D. <strong>and</strong> ZHANG, Y. 2008. Rapid clonal propagation <strong>of</strong><br />

Zygophyllum xanthoxylon (Bunge) Maxim., an endangered desert forage<br />

species. In Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology – Plant 44: 396-400<br />

SURI, S.S. <strong>and</strong> RAMAWAT, K.G. 1996. Effect <strong>of</strong> Calotropis latex on laticifers<br />

differentiation in callus cultures <strong>of</strong> Calotropis procera. Biologia Plantarum 38:<br />

185-190<br />

166


TALHOUK, R.S., KARAM, C., FOSTOK, S., EL-JOUNI, W., BARBOUR, E.K.,<br />

2007. Anti-inflammatory bioactivities in plant extracts. Journal <strong>of</strong> Medicinal<br />

Food 10: 1-10<br />

TAPINGKAE, T. <strong>and</strong> TAJI, A. 2000. Light quality <strong>and</strong> quantity: Their effects on in<br />

vitro growth <strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong> two Australian plant species. Acta<br />

Horticulturae 541: 281-288<br />

TAYLOR, J.L.S. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J. 2001. In vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> Eucomis<br />

L‟Herit species-plants with <strong>medicinal</strong> <strong>and</strong> horticultural potential. Plant Growth<br />

Regulation 34: 317-329.<br />

THOMAS, T.D. <strong>and</strong> PHILIP, B. 2005. Thidiazuron-induced high-frequency shoot<br />

organogenesis from leaf-derived callus <strong>of</strong> a <strong>medicinal</strong> climber, Tylophora<br />

indica (Burm. F.) Merrill. In Vitro Cellular <strong>and</strong> Developmental Biology – Plant<br />

41: 124–128<br />

THOMAS, T.D. <strong>and</strong> SHANKAR, S. 2009. Multiple shoot induction <strong>and</strong> callus<br />

regeneration in Sarcostemma brevistigma Wight & Arnott, a rare <strong>medicinal</strong><br />

plant. Plant Biotechnology Reports 3: 67–74<br />

TIAN, F., LI, B., JI, B., YANG, J., ZHANG, G., CHEN, Y. <strong>and</strong> LUO, Y. 2009a.<br />

Antioxidant <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial activities <strong>of</strong> consecutive extracts from Galla<br />

chinensis: The polarity affects the bioactivities. Food Chemistry 113: 173–<br />

179<br />

TIAN, F., LI, B., JI, B., ZHANG, G. <strong>and</strong> LUO, Y. 2009b. Identification <strong>and</strong><br />

structure–activity relationship <strong>of</strong> gallotannins separated from Galla chinensis.<br />

LWT - Food Science <strong>and</strong> Technology 42: 1289–1295<br />

TORRES, K.C. 1989. Tissue Culture Techniques for Horticultural Crops. Van<br />

Nostr<strong>and</strong> Reinhold, USA. 285pp<br />

TUNALIER, Z., KOŞAR, M., KÜPELI, E., ÇALIŞ, I. <strong>and</strong> BAŞER, K.H.C. 2007.<br />

Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-nociceptive activities <strong>and</strong> composition <strong>of</strong><br />

Lythrum salicaria L. extracts. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 110: 539-547<br />

167


TURNER, S. 2001. Witwatersr<strong>and</strong> National Botanical Garden. Accessed at<br />

http://www.plantzafrica.com/plantab/barlergreen.htm. Accessed on 20<br />

February 2007<br />

VAN STADEN, J. 2008. Ethnobotany in South Africa. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Ethnopharmacology 119: 329-330<br />

VAN STADEN, J. <strong>and</strong> CROUCH, N.R. 1996. Benzyladenine <strong>and</strong> derivatives -<br />

their significance <strong>and</strong> interconversion in plants. Plant Growth Regulation 19:<br />

153-175<br />

VAN STADEN, J. <strong>and</strong> DREWES, F.E. 1992. The stability <strong>and</strong> metabolism <strong>of</strong><br />

benzyladenine glucosides in soybean callus. Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Physiology 140:<br />

92-95<br />

VAN VUUREN, S.F. 2008. Antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> South African <strong>medicinal</strong> plants.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 119: 462-472<br />

VANE, J. 1994. Towards a better aspirin. Nature 367: 215-216<br />

VENKATESWARA, R., SANKARA RAO, K. <strong>and</strong> VAIDYANATHAN, C.S. 1987.<br />

Cryptosin- a new cardenolide in tissue culture <strong>and</strong> intact plants <strong>of</strong> Cryptolepis<br />

buchanani Roem. & Schult. Plant Cell Reports 6: 291-293<br />

VERMA, P.K., SHARMA, A., JOSHI, S.C., GUPTA, R.S. <strong>and</strong> DIXIT, V.P. 2005.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> isolated fractions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barleria</strong> prionitis root methanolic extract on<br />

reproductive function <strong>of</strong> male rats: preliminary study. Fitoterapia 76: 428-<br />

432<br />

VESELOVA, S.V., FARHUTDINOV, R.G., VESELOV, S.Y., KUDOYAROVA,<br />

G.R., VESELOV, D.S. <strong>and</strong> HARTUNG, W. 2005. The effect <strong>of</strong> root cooling<br />

on hormone content, leaf conductance <strong>and</strong> root hydraulic conductivity <strong>of</strong><br />

durum wheat seedlings (Triticum durum L.). Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Physiology 162:<br />

21-26<br />

168


VIJI, V. <strong>and</strong> HELEN, A. 2008. Inhibition <strong>of</strong> lipoxygenases <strong>and</strong> cyclooxygenase-2<br />

enzymes by extracts isolated from Bacopa monniera (L.) Wettst. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Ethnopharmacology 118: 305-311<br />

VINUTHA, B., PRASHANTH, D., SALMA, K., SREEJA, S.L., PRATITI, D.,<br />

PADMAJA, R., RADHIKA, S., AMIT, A., VENKATESHWARLU, K. <strong>and</strong><br />

DEEPAK, M. 2007. Screening <strong>of</strong> selected Indian <strong>medicinal</strong> plants for<br />

acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 109:<br />

359-363<br />

WANIKIAT, P., PANTHONG, A., SUJAYANON, P., YOSOOK, C., ROSSI, A.G.<br />

<strong>and</strong> REUTRAKUL, V. 2008. The anti-inflammatory effects <strong>and</strong> the inhibition<br />

<strong>of</strong> neutrophil responsiveness by <strong>Barleria</strong> lupulina <strong>and</strong> Clinacanthus nutans<br />

extracts. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 116: 234-244<br />

WARNER, T.D. <strong>and</strong> MITCHELL, J.A. 2008. COX-2 selectivity alone does not<br />

define the cardiovascular risks associated with non-steroidal anti-<br />

inflammatory drugs. Lancet 371: 270-273<br />

WATSON, L. <strong>and</strong> DALLWITZ, M.J. 1992. The families <strong>of</strong> flowering plants:<br />

descriptions, illustrations, identification, <strong>and</strong> information retrieval. Version:<br />

10 th April 2008. Accessed at http://delta-intkey.com. Accessed on 15 Aug<br />

2008<br />

WERBROUCK, S.P.O., STRNAD, M., VAN ONCKELEN, H.A. <strong>and</strong> DEBERGH,<br />

P.C. 1996. Meta-topolin, an alternative to benzyladenine in tissue culture.<br />

Physiologia Plantarum 98: 291-297<br />

WERBROUCK, S.P.O., VAN DER JEUGT, B., DEWITTE, W., PRINSEN, E., VAN<br />

ONCKELEN, H.A. <strong>and</strong> DEBERGH, P.C. 1995. The metabolism <strong>of</strong><br />

benzyladenine in Spathiphyllum floribundum 'Schott Petite' in relation to<br />

acclimatisation problems. Plant Cell Reports 14: 662-665<br />

WHITE, P.R. 1963. The Cultivation <strong>of</strong> Animal <strong>and</strong> Plant Cells. (2 nd ed.) Ronald<br />

Press, New York. 239pp<br />

169


WILLIAMSON, E., OKPAKO, D.T. <strong>and</strong> EVANS, F.J. 1996. Selection, Preparation<br />

<strong>and</strong> Pharmacological Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Plant Material. Wiley, Chichester<br />

WOCHOK, Z.S. 1981. The role <strong>of</strong> tissue culture in preserving threatened <strong>and</strong><br />

endangered plant species. Biological Conservation 20: 83-89<br />

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO), 2004. Accessed at<br />

http://www.afro.who.int/country_<strong>of</strong>fices_press/2004/pr20040330.html.<br />

Accessed on 02 March 2007<br />

XIA, J., ZHAO, H., LIU, W., LI, L. <strong>and</strong> HE, Y. 2009. Role <strong>of</strong> cytokinin <strong>and</strong> salicylic<br />

acid in plant growth at low temperatures. Plant Growth Regulation 57: 211-<br />

221<br />

XIAO, J., JIANG, X. <strong>and</strong> CHEN, X. 2005. Antibacterial, anti-inflammatory <strong>and</strong><br />

diuretic effect <strong>of</strong> flavonoids from Marchantia convoluta. African Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Traditional, Complementary <strong>and</strong> Alternative Medicines 2: 244-252<br />

ZAŽĺMALOVÁ, E., BŘEZINOVÁ, A., HOLĺK, J. <strong>and</strong> OPATRNÝ, Z. 1996. Partial<br />

auxin deprivation affects endogenous cytokinins in an auxin-dependent,<br />

cytokinin-independent tobacco cell strain. Plant Cell Reports 16: 76-79<br />

ZSCHOCKE, S., DREWES, S.E., PAULUS, K., BAUER, R. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN,<br />

J. 2000a. Analytical <strong>and</strong> pharmacological investigation <strong>of</strong> Ocotea bullata<br />

(black stinkwood) bark <strong>and</strong> leaves. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 71: 219-<br />

230<br />

ZSCHOCKE, S., RABE, T., TAYLOR, J.L.S., JÄGER, A.K. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN,<br />

J. 2000b. Plant part substitution – a way to conserve endangered <strong>medicinal</strong><br />

plants? Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 71: 281-292<br />

ZSCHOCKE, S. <strong>and</strong> VAN STADEN, J., 2000. Cryptocarya species – substitute<br />

plants for Ocotea bullata? A pharmacological investigation in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

cyclooxygenase-1 <strong>and</strong> -2 inhibition. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology 71: 473-<br />

478<br />

170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!