Next Article in Journal
A Full Population Auditing Method Based on Machine Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Review of Regional Renewable Energy Investment Projects: The Example of EU Cohesion Funds Dispersal
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Revegetation on Tropical Steep Slopes after Mining and Infrastructure Projects: Challenges and Solutions

by
Markus Gastauer
1,2,*,
Jhonny Capichoni Massante
1,
Silvio Junio Ramos
1,
Rayara do Socorro Souza da Silva
1,
Daniela Boanares
1,
Rafael Silva Guedes
1,†,
Cecílio Frois Caldeira
1,
Priscila Sanjuan Medeiros-Sarmento
1,
Arianne Flexa de Castro
1,2,
Isabelle Gonçalves de Oliveira Prado
1,
André Luiz de Rezende Cardoso
3,
Clóvis Maurity
1 and
Paula Godinho Ribeiro
1
1
Instituto Tecnológico Vale, Rua Boaventura da Silva, 955, Bairro Nazaré, Belém 66055-200, PA, Brazil
2
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, R. Augusto Corrêa, 01, Bairro Guamá, Belém 66075-110, PA, Brazil
3
Bioma Meio Ambiente, Alameda do Ingá, 840, Vale do Sereno, Nova Lima 34006-042, MG, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Laboratório de Ciência do Solo, Instituto de Estudos do Trópico Úmido, Universidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará, Rua Alberto Santos Dumont, s/n, Residencial Jardim Universitário, Xinguara 68557-335, PA, Brazil.
Sustainability 2022, 14(24), 17003; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142417003
Submission received: 24 October 2022 / Revised: 7 November 2022 / Accepted: 21 November 2022 / Published: 19 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Resources and Sustainable Utilization)

Abstract

:

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • Five frequently interacting abiotic constraints challenge steep slope revegetation
  • Spontaneous vegetation establishment in natural steep slope habitats is a long-term process
  • Specific plant functional groups show adaptations for establishing in steep slope environments
What is the implication of the main finding?
  • Different planting strategies, e.g., hydroseeding and geotextiles, enhance vegetation cover
  • Combining soil conditioning, planting strategies, and carefully selected species enhances steep slope rehabilitation.

Abstract

The revegetation of steep slopes after mining and infrastructure projects is not an easy task. To enhance the effectiveness of revegetation projects, the present study aimed to review (i) specific challenges of steep slope revegetation, (ii) ecological succession patterns in similar environments, (iii) soil conditioning and revegetation strategies to enhance vegetation cover, (iv) the importance of microorganisms to enhance steep slope revegetation, and (v) the functional plant traits necessary to establish on steep slopes. In general, steep slopes are characterized by high bulk densities, potentially toxic elements, and low water and nutrient availability. Additionally, high temperature and elevated radiation constrain the soil conditioning and vegetation cover establishment. Lessons from ecological succession in natural steep slope habitats show that steep slope revegetation is a long-term process. Planting strategies, including hydroseeding and geotextiles, may enhance the implementation of vegetation cover. Different plant functional groups show adaptations necessary for establishment in steep slope environments, and mixtures of species containing different functional groups can promote diverse and resilient plant communities. Promising species may be retrieved from local rupestrian ecosystems, as these floras are adapted to shallow, oligotrophic soils. Further research on combining methods of soil conditioning with individual planting and/or seeding strategies of carefully selected species is necessary to enhance steep slope revegetation and rehabilitation, contributing to slope stability, erosion reduction, and carbon fixation in the long term.

1. Introduction

Economic development, even when sustainable, such as the transition to support a low-carbon future, depends on infrastructure construction [1,2] and mineral extraction [3,4,5]. These activities are frequently accompanied by excavations that result in the formation of exposed slopes, spatial impacts, and the amount of overburden that needs to be replaced [6]. The majority of these slopes are steep or extremely steep, with inclinations greater than 45°, creating extensive and unsightly scars in the landscape [7]. In addition, slope failure in mine pits or along transport infrastructure causes loss of property and lives or injuries, as well as disruptions in economic activities [7,8]. Therefore, the stability of steep slopes is a major concern, and revegetation by means of soil bioengineering techniques is considered the most viable alternative to increase the overall safety of slopes [9,10,11].
Vegetation cover reduces the soil erodibility of steep slopes and downstream sediment loads [12] by increasing infiltration capacity and soil water storage [13] and decreasing soil desiccation [14]. Furthermore, the greening of steep slopes can trigger environmental rehabilitation through ecological succession, reducing the impacts of mining or infrastructure projects on biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services in the long term, especially when native species are used [15]. However, the steep slope hampers the revegetation process due to environmental conditions differing largely from areas planted for agricultural purposes, parks, or gardens [16,17]. Major challenges include the improvement of soil conditions (due to the presence of potentially toxic elements, compaction, low nutritional status, and reduced biological activity), the selection of fast-growing native plant species adapted to environmental constraints similar to those found on steep slopes, and the fixation of seeds on inclined surfaces. Thus, understanding the relationships between physical, chemical, and biological soil properties and spontaneous vegetation on steep slopes is crucial to overcoming these challenges and enhancing vegetation cover [18].
Here we review the challenges of steep slope revegetation, considering the breadth of the available natural and engineering solutions. To integrate ecology and engineering science, we discern the constraints challenging steep slope revegetation. Then, we look closely at ecological succession patterns in natural environments showing similar characteristics as artificial steep slopes and try to functionally characterize species found spontaneously establishing on steep slopes. With these lessons in mind, we revised technical and nature-based solutions to enhance steep slope revegetation, highlighting the physiological and ecological characteristics of plant species that enable the successful establishment and greening of these environments. We expect that our findings can guide the search in regional floras for promising candidate species that promote steep slope revegetation and their rehabilitation in the long term.

2. Challenges of Steep Slope Revegetation

A set of inherent environmental characteristics of steep slopes make their revegetation challenging. A detailed understanding of these characteristics is necessary to enhance revegetation practices. First, the inclination of mineland benches per se reduces the chances of fixing seeds and additional revegetation inputs such as fertilizers or organic composts [19,20]. Seeds and fertilizers tend to accumulate in the lower portions of the slope [21] and generate spatially heterogeneous vegetation patterns, leading to an inability to retain superficial water runoff [22,23]. This increases the risk of soil erosion [24] and highlights the importance of soil protection measures [21].
Second, difficulties in fixing fertilizers on steep slopes aggravate nutrient availability, as substrates outcropping on steep slopes are generally unweathered bedrocks without fertile topsoil layers and with low contents of organic matter [25,26]. Low nutrient availability is magnified by the low abundance and diversity of microorganisms, including plant mutualists, such as nitrogen-fixing bacteria or mycorrhizae, which can facilitate plant establishment [27,28]. This makes steep slope ecosystems unable to sustain vegetation cover [29]. The fastest way to increase nutrient availability in these soils is by chemical fertilization [30]. However, inclination and low vegetation cover at the beginning of revegetation activities challenge nutrient incorporation in biomass [31]. An alternative to managing steep slope soil fertility is organic fertilization, which is positively correlated with microbial activity and diversity, but it requires effective incorporation into the slope substrate to prevent its rapid displacement [32,33,34].
Third, the lack of vegetation cover increases the radiation intensity on steep slope surfaces, increasing the soil temperature and water evaporation, especially in tropical regions. High temperature and water deficiency can impair germination and prevent seedling emergence [35], as seed germination, specifically that of native species, requires a specific range of soil temperatures and osmotic potentials [36,37]. Thus, the colonization of steep slopes is often restricted to undesired alien invasive species with germination at elevated temperatures [38]. In many revegetation projects worldwide, fast-growing, nonnative, commercial grass-legume mixtures are frequently applied for steep slope revegetation, and these mixtures are able to cover degraded slopes rapidly [39]. Nitrogen-fixing legumes are expected to function as green fertilizers, improving soil nitrogen content [40], while C4 grasses increase soil organic matter through their high photosynthetic activity combined with high water-use efficiency [41]. The advantages of these seed mixtures are their availability at local markets and low costs [42] and their good coverage of steep slopes after seeding. Nevertheless, if seeded in high densities, these mixtures may reduce the establishment and survival of native species desired for long-term slope rehabilitation [43].
Fourth, depending on the mined ore and the geological context, benches and steep slopes from mine pits may contain potentially toxic heavy metals [44,45,46]. This requires selecting metal-tolerant plant species [47] or hyperaccumulators [48,49] for revegetation. Removing plants enriched in heavy metals may contribute to phytoremediation and phytomining [50,51,52], but the viability of such activities on steep slopes is usually limited.
Fifth, unweathered bedrocks suddenly outcropping on the surface generally show high bulk density and penetration resistance, which reduces root growth, soil moisture content and overall vegetation establishment [53,54]. As the soil density and mechanical resistance to penetration increase, the abundance of water-storing pores decreases [30,55], favoring superficial water runoff [56]. Additionally, steep slopes reduce the possibilities for mechanical aeration, such as subsoiling or deep plowing, commonly applied to overcome compaction in agricultural soils. Therefore, where other solutions are unavailable, root growth, e.g., by compaction-tolerant plants, is expected to increase porosity, hydraulic conductivity and, consequently, water storage capacity on steep slopes [57,58].
Abiotic constraints (inclination, low nutrient and water statuses, high radiation, high bulk density and the eventual presence of potentially toxic elements) make steep slopes the most challenging environments for revegetation. Revegetation of these habitats requires selecting species with specific physiological mechanisms and growth strategies that allow their germination and establishment [7]. Therefore, approaches focusing on species’ functional characteristics represent promising tools for doing so [59]. Furthermore, implementation techniques that enable the fixation of seeds and further revegetation inputs on steep slopes should be developed while minimizing operational risks.

3. Ecological Succession in Natural Steep Slope Ecosystems

Ecological succession describes the temporal sequence of distinct communities colonizing naturally or anthropogenically disturbed habitats. A habitat can be disturbed either naturally or artificially, and disturbance is the removal of biomass through, for example, natural tree falls, logging, as well as all kinds of earthworks. After such a disturbance, chance [60], differences in species life histories [61,62], environmental filtering or changing interaction patterns result in recurrent or nonrecurrent changes in plant communities over time [63]. Generally, natural succession starts with the colonization of a few pioneer species, and the diversity and complexity of the stands increase with time [64,65]. In contrast to restoration models, e.g., by natural regeneration [66], human rehabilitation activities after disturbances manipulate succession paths to recover original species composition, soil fertility, and site stability [67]. Thus, natural succession is considered a guide for ecosystem rehabilitation [68,69,70], despite underutilized lessons in practice [71].
Depending on soil type, climate, and other factors, landslides after heavy rainfall or earthquakes may show inclinations, soil compaction, and fertility similar to those of artificial steep slope ecosystems because landslides lead to sudden outcrops of bedrock parent material on the surface, delaying or even hampering plant colonization and ecological succession [72]. There are a few well-studied cases of delayed succession worldwide. For example, after a landslide in Lombardy, northern Italy, ecological succession achieved ecological maturity only 15 years after slope stabilization [73]. On a landslide chronosequence in New Zealand, vegetation establishment was even slower: mosses, grasses, herbs, ferns, and small shrubs were observed to colonize within short periods, but vegetation cover greater than 50% was achieved only after more than 50 years [74]. In another example, in Puerto Rico, the upper parts of landslide slopes showed less plant density and diversity than the lower parts [72], most likely due to differences in organic matter accumulation. These findings show that unassisted vegetation establishment and ecological succession after landslides is a slow process that depends on soil characteristics, especially on the steeper, upper parts of the slope. Delays in vegetation development furthermore create opportunities for the invasion of undesired alien species [75].
Therefore, revegetation and rehabilitation activities should analyze the functional traits that enable the spontaneous establishment of some species in these environments (Box 1) [76] to accelerate ecological succession on artificial steep slopes. Prospecting native species with similar ecological traits increase functional redundancy, resilience, and the success rate of revegetation [77].
Box 1. Small seeds enable spontaneous colonization of ruderal or invasive species on steep mining slopes in Carajás.
The Carajás National Forest in southeastern Amazon, Pará State, Brazil, is home to the Carajás Synclinorium, which features 18 billion tons of high-grade iron ore, with Fe contents well above the international trading standards [78]. The iron deposits are exploited in open pit mines characterized by steep cut slopes reaching heights up to 15 m and inclinations up to 85°.
Species detected during field inspections of mining cut slopes at this site are small-seeded, wind-dispersed, ruderal species, including some sedge species, lilac tasselflower (Emilia sonchifolia (L.) DC., Asteraceae) and exotic molasses grass (Melinis minutiflora P. Beauv., Poaceae) (Figure 1). These species produce large amounts of small seeds, and their invasive potential has been described for disturbed areas [79]. Additionally, the silver fern (Pityrogramma calomelanos (L.) Link, Pteridaceae), bird-dispersed, small-seeded alien Singapore cherry (Muntingia calabura L., Muntingiaceae) and pokeweed (Phytolacca thyrsiflora Fenzl. ex J.A. Schmidt, Phytolaccaceae) were also found frequently.
Similar patterns were found in other tropical steep slopes [80], highlighting the colonization abilities of invasive or ruderal weeds and ferns [81] on steep slopes. Thus, large amounts of small seeds, which are dispersed by wind, seem crucial for successful steep slope colonization. Therefore, native flora should be prospected for species with these or similar traits to find promising candidates for steep slope revegetation, as slope colonization by natives may impede or reduce the spreading of alien invasive species such as molasses grass or Singapore cherry.
Figure 1. Plant species that have spontaneously colonized iron mining cut slopes in the Carajás National Forest [81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102].
Figure 1. Plant species that have spontaneously colonized iron mining cut slopes in the Carajás National Forest [81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102].
Sustainability 14 17003 g001

4. Soil Conditioning and Implementation Strategies

As natural steep slope revegetation is a slow process [103], partly because these areas are colonized spontaneously by only a few species (see Box 1), active revegetation is needed to accelerate this process and launch steep slope rehabilitation [104]. However, active revegetation by sowing or seedling planting is challenged by difficulties in fixing plant propagules on surfaces with extreme inclinations, reduced nutrient and water availability, and soil compaction. This section presents techniques to enhance soil quality and support plant propagules in steep slope environments (Figure 2).
Reducing slope angles: The inclination of steep slopes prevents mechanical soil management and aeration using agricultural machinery [105]. Furthermore, loosened soil material becomes prone to soil erosion, eventually causing environmental disasters [106]. Reducing the slope angle may thus be an alternative to overcoming revegetation challenges [107,108] by facilitating seeding, planting and soil aeration, increasing water infiltration, and reducing operational risks. However, the reduction in slope angles increases land consumption, the amount of overburden that needs to be deposited in other sites and project costs. For mining activities, the reduction in slope angles may be achieved by filling mine pits with waste or tailings after complete exploitation of the ore deposit. However, mountainous relief may impede straightforward logistics that enable the backfilling of caves as mining activities advance [109].
Soil aeration: In natural environments, soil aeration is achieved by bioturbation, i.e., the reworking of soils and sediments by animals or plants, including burrowing, ingestion, and subsequent defecation of soil particles. Bioturbating animals such as certain tunneling dung beetles [110] or anecic earthworms [111] have positive long-term impacts on the structure of compacted soils when soil conditions such as acidity, nutrient and food availability and moisture content are favorable. The colonization of steep slopes by these invertebrates may occur with advances in rehabilitation, but further research may outline the potential of steep slope inoculation with these organisms and their eventual effects on soil porosity.
Cover soils: The natural development of soil through bedrock weathering is a slow process, and soil that evolves on steep slopes is likely to be eroded before plants can establish. Natural or synthetic cover soils may be sprayed as an adhesive slurry on steep slopes, forming a thin continuous layer on the bare slope surface and facilitating root development and water infiltration [112]. Such soil spraying mixed with seeds and fertilizers represents a modified hydroseeding technique. A special form of cover soil is so-called topsoil, i.e., the upper soil layers containing microorganisms, nutrients, organic matter, and seeds. Topsoils originating from logging areas positively influenced soil fertility, microbial activity, and vegetation cover in postmining landscapes [113,114]. Nevertheless, its use is limited, as topsoil depends on local availability, quality, and treatment (during removal, transport, storage, and application), highlighting the demand for suitable alternatives [115] and in situ soil reconstruction [103,116].
Soil amendments: These are intended to improve the chemical and physical soil conditions and enhance early seedling performance [117]. While chemical fertilizers and biosolids increase the availability of micro- and macronutrients, lime and organic components are applied mostly to improve soil structure, moisture and cation exchange capacity [42]. Additionally, organic and inorganic amendments can reduce bulk density and the bioavailability of potentially toxic elements [118,119]. Water superabsorbent polymers (SAPs), also referred to as hydrogels or superabsorbers, are synthetic compounds that can absorb up to 400 times their weight in water [120,121] and retain moisture and nutrients [122], especially where drought events are intense and frequent [123]. When isolated or combined with fertilizers, SAPs enhance early survival and growth in a wide range of plant species [124,125,126], with positive effects on germination rates and plant establishment [127,128]. Thus, SAPs may be applied for mineland revegetation activities [107], e.g., by incorporation into seed coatings [129] or in planting containers.
Irrigation: Artificial irrigation, particularly drip irrigation, has a large potential to overcome temporal water scarcity, reduce drought stress and enhance vegetation development in systems limited by soil volume, such as steep slopes [130]. Experiments demonstrate that cost-effective revegetation can be achieved when low-irrigation systems are combined with the hydroseeding of native species [131]. However, irrigation may reduce slope stability significantly [132] and increase the risks of liquefaction-induced landslides [133,134,135], especially in combination with extreme rainfall events. Thus, irrigation projects require intense monitoring activities to facilitate safeguards and reduce the risk of landslide hazards [134,136].
Planting containers: A crucial step for successful revegetation (provided that a suitable substrate is available or can be developed for plant growth) is the introduction of plant propagules that can be established on a slope. This can be achieved by planting nursery-raised seedlings or plants rescued from logging areas. Seedlings can be specifically conditioned to the expected environmental conditions of revegetation sites, providing a quicker recovery of the desired vegetation structure and ecological succession than seeding strategies [137]. In addition, larger planting containers improve seedling survival and growth [138,139] because larger pits reduce damage resulting from water scarcity and solar radiation [140] and prevent topsoil/substrate desiccation and degradation [53]. However, the creation of large planting pits and seedling plantations is labor intensive and increases the risk exposure of operators and thus is not always feasible.
Hydroseeding: Seeding is less expensive than planting but can be difficult to achieve on steep slopes, as seeds, especially larger ones, are easily washed away. Thus, hydroseeding, i.e., the spraying of a slurry containing seeds, mulch, fertilizers and other inputs on the slope’s surface, may represent an attractive strategy for the revegetation of bare slopes due to a high degree of mechanization, high efficiency and reduction in operational risks [141], especially when native species are used [112]. The hydroseeding slurry varies across projects and contains soil amendments and other materials that increase water retention and organic matter accumulation and trigger soil development. The composition of the hydroseeding slurries determines the success of vegetation recovery and its effects on the slope’s physical and chemical soil properties [142]. However, the success of hydroseeding depends mostly on microsite suitability [143,144], and established vegetation cannot always persist in subsequent years [145].
Air-borne seeding methods: The use of remotely piloted aircrafts for monitoring and inspections is becoming prominent in industry [146,147]. With the availability of this technique, drones, small airplanes or helicopters are frequently used for seeding activities [148], presenting a viable alternative to hydroseeding.
Geotextiles: i.e., mats made from dry organic fibers, have been widely used to fix revegetation inputs, protect the soil surface, control erosion and homogenize vegetation development on steep slopes [149,150]. They can be made from either organic synthetic fibers (e.g., polypropylene, polyester, polyethylene) or natural fibers (e.g., jute, coir, sisal), with different designs according to functional needs [151]. By retaining soil moisture for a longer period, geotextiles are expected to provide more suitable conditions for seed germination, seedling growth, and overall vegetation development [152,153], although context-specific failures have been reported [154]. Temporary materials, such as geosynthetic biodegradable biopolymers are currently tested; the results are promising, but more effort should be addressed [155,156,157].

5. The Importance of Microorganisms to Enhance Steep Slope Revegetation

Although many microorganisms have beneficial effects on soil quality and vegetation development, two groups able to favor plant development in inhospitable environments, such as steep slopes, are noteworthy. First, symbiotic rhizobacteria fix atmospheric nitrogen and provide nitrogen compounds to their hosts in exchange for photoassimilates [158]. In addition to nitrogen capture, this association promotes an increase in aboveground biomass and species diversity, which are key for the coexistence of different legume and nonlegume species [159]. Although rhizobia are abundant in the soil of many ecosystems [160], rhizobia capable of efficiently nodulating a given legume host are not always present in the soil, so the selection and inoculation of efficient strains may become necessary [161].
Second, the mycelia of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) increase the root’s absorption surface for water and nutrients, delivering soil nutrients to their plant hosts in return for carbon [27]. Some species increase the soil moisture content in the root zone [162], enhancing plant survival in periods of water shortage [163]. Furthermore, some AMF species are of interest due to their high tolerance to contaminated environments, such as species of the Glomeraceae family [164] that show high resistance to elevated availability of Zn, Cu, Cd, and Pb [165,166].
The promotion of this tripartite symbiosis among plants, rhizobia, and AMF can favor the establishment and development of plants in oligotrophic or nutrient-depleted environments such as steep slopes [167]. Furthermore, topsoil spraying or the use of inoculated seedlings can provide benefits for revegetation [168,169]. Most research on microbial inoculants is related to crops of commercial interest [170], and the development of inoculants for native plant species, e.g., using trap cultures [169], should be investigated for the improvement of steep slope revegetation/rehabilitation activities.

6. Promising Plants for Steep Slope Revegetation

A first step in selecting species is to consider that environmental legislation from many countries requires the prioritization of native species in rehabilitation projects, especially within conservation units [15]. Native species reintroduced to steep slopes during revegetation activities should provide erosion control and support vegetation development toward full ecological rehabilitation [171]. As denser vegetation and root systems provide greater physical soil protection, easily propagated and fast-growing species are desired [81,172]. So-called nurse plants, able to facilitate the arrival and establishment of additional plant species [173], may be required to trigger ecological succession, establish trophic networks and achieve dynamic, process-based rehabilitation goals in the long term [15].
Additionally, reintroduced plant species must be adapted to the environmental constraints presented by steep slopes (Figure 3) [174]. Plant establishment on uncovered steep slopes is limited by high radiation and elevated temperatures in tropical or subtropical regions, which reduces water availability, especially when precipitation is not distributed homogeneously throughout the year. Therefore, species should be drought-tolerant [175] and able to develop with little or no soil, e.g., species from shallow-soil ecosystems [15,176] or that grow between or on rocks, such as some orchids, ferns, liverwort or lichens (so-called lithophytes) [177]. Foliar water uptake from fog or erratic rain pulses can support successful plant establishment on steep slopes and provide higher photosynthetic rates and better thermotolerance than that observed in species without this adaptation [178,179]. Alternatively, soil compaction-tolerant species, such as nonforest [180], early successional [181] and/or finely or fibrously rooted species [182], can be prospected for this purpose. Furthermore, the ideal species is adapted to acidic, oligotrophic soils with high concentrations of potentially toxic elements.
Thus, promising species should couple high photosynthetic activity with high water-use efficiency and desiccation tolerance, similar to C4 or CAM plants [183]. Furthermore, small plants with sclerophyllous leaves and photosynthetic tissues covered by trichomes are more promising for target environments than species without these adaptations [184]. Plants adapted to oligotrophic ecosystems should be preferred over nitrophilic species, and species able to increase nutrient and/or water uptake by acidic root exudates [185] or interactions with spontaneously establishing or inoculated microorganisms such as rhizobia or mycorrhiza are highly welcome [186]. Finally, small-seeded species or species with seeds featuring adhesive structures, attributes generally related to better dispersal [187], should facilitate fixation on steep slopes, especially of self-seeding generations that should attach to the slope surface without the application of fixing components such as those applied during hydroseeding procedures (Figure 3).
Plant functional groups, i.e., groups of plant species defined by physical, phylogenetic or phenological characteristics, differ in their potential to overcome revegetation challenges and link to long-term rehabilitation targets (Figure 4). Light-demanding, fast-growing native pioneer forest species, commonly observed during initial successional stages and frequently applied in restoration projects [188], are adapted to high temperatures and radiation and generally produce elevated numbers of small, wind-dispersed seeds that are more easily fixed on steep slopes [189,190]. Furthermore, some pioneer species are able to deal with and recover degraded and compacted soils [191,192] and initiate ecological succession toward self-perpetuating mature ecosystems. However, drop interception for erosion control is more effective near the soil surface, so herbs and shrubs have greater potential than pioneer tree species to reduce the impacts of drops [14,81].
Plant species from ecosystems characterized by water shortages and/or nutrient limitations are expected to perform better on steep slopes than species from less severe habitats [193,194]. Nonforest ecosystems, including rupestrian vegetation, are generally better adapted to high radiation, elevated temperatures and high iron concentrations and are furthermore able to develop with minimal amounts of soil [195,196]. Ephemeral herbs from such ecosystems are characterized by short life cycles during favorable seasons and produce large amounts of small, wind-dispersed seeds, some of which have elevated germination even in mining substrates [197]. High biomass accumulation during short life cycles increases soil organic matter and initiates nutrient cycling. Perennial, desiccation-tolerant life forms from these environments can guarantee year-around vegetation cover, thus reducing superficial soil desiccation, increasing soil water storage by vertical root distribution and triggering successional advances of steep slopes [14]. Species with lightweight fruits, e.g., pappus from the Asteraceae family, can fix more easily on small fissures on steep slopes. Additionally, desiccation-tolerant Fabaceae species able to nodulate and fix atmospheric N from severe environments are expected to positively influence the soil quality of steep slopes [198].
Grasses develop a dense, multilayered cover that can effectively intercept rain, and an elevated number of stems represents a mechanical barrier to runoff and sediment losses [199,200] due to high carbon fixation capacity and high water-use efficiency [41]. Additionally, strong fibrous, superficial root systems (Figure 5) prevent erosion by holding loose soil on the slope surface. These root systems can also adapt to poor soil conditions and form mulches after drying [201].
Fern species represent a promising alternative plant group that is able to form dense vegetation cover on natural or artificial slopes in tropical or subtropical climates [202]. Characteristics generally attributed to pioneer species such as small propagules (microscopic spores), colonization of disturbed habitats due to extensive rhizome growth [203] and adaptations to low contents of soil nutrients and moisture observed in some fern species [204] enable spontaneous colonization on steep slopes. Preliminary tests highlighted that elevated fern cover is able to reduce runoff volume and sediment loss [81], although large differences between single species were observed [205]. Different fern species can be found in all ecosystems [206], and their prospect and inclusion in steep slope revegetation projects can benefit the establishment of plant communities [207] and moderate the physical environmental constraints (e.g., temperature) of the slopes to facilitate invertebrate colonization [208].
Although herb and shrub species are the primary targets for steep slope revegetation activities, other life forms can also be considered [209]. Lianas, vines and other life forms with scandic habits emit branches with growth ability both upward and downward. In many species, branches can adhere to vertical faces by tendrils or air roots, developing a heat- and drought-resistant curtain [210]. Many vines and lianas are pioneer species that develop under full sunlight conditions [211]. Thus, planting or seeding of lianas at the top or at the bottom of steep slopes prevents the development of roots on water- and nutrient-depleted, compacted, rocky, shotcrete, unstable rubble-stone or even overhanging slopes [212]. Such vertical greening technologies require only small amounts of soil [213] and have been successfully applied in an abandoned quarry in eastern Zhejiang Province, China [211].
Finally, the Cactaceae family, which includes approximately 130 genera and 2000 species [214], is characterized by adaptation to arid and semiarid climates in tropical and subtropical regions [215]. Cactus Pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) was used to revegetate degraded soils in northern Ethiopia and successfully improved fertility and physical soil properties compared to those in adjacent open areas [216]. Cacti also play a major role in erosion control on steep slopes, particularly when established in hedges, by reducing surface crusting and superficial runoff [217].

7. Conclusions

In order to enhance steep slope revegetation, we mapped five interacting abiotic challenges for steep slope revegetation, i.e., inclination, low nutrient and water statuses, high radiation, high bulk density, and the eventual presence of potentially toxic elements. These environmental constraints, also found in natural steep slope habitats, delay vegetation establishment and ecological succession. Thus, artificial steep slope revegetation should thus aim for compliance with long-term goals related to rehabilitation and ecosystem restoration, instead of solely focusing on short-term greening.
Neither a single plant species nor a single plant functional group has been identified as a jack of all trades for steep slope revegetation. However, small, wind-dispersed seeds, ideally with adhesive structures, and species with rapid growth ability and desiccation tolerance were recognized as being suitable for steep slope revegetation. Promising candidate species with these adaptations may be retrieved from regional nonforest ecosystems with shallow soil and nutrient and water limitations, and seed collection strategies, propagation protocols, and implementation techniques should be developed.
A set of promising approaches to overcome environmental constraints and enhance revegetation of steep slopes is available, but thus far, no single solution has shown overall success. Thus, further research on combining methods of soil conditioning with individual planting strategies of carefully selected species is required to overcome the challenges of steep slope revegetation and rehabilitation, contributing to slope stability, resilient vegetation cover, and carbon fixation in the long term.

Author Contributions

M.G. designed the study with contributions from C.F.C., R.S.G. and S.J.R. The initial draft was written by M.G., S.J.R., R.S.G., C.F.C., A.F.d.C. and C.M.; detailed revisions of specific topics and/or the entire document were carried out by J.C.M., R.d.S.S.d.S., I.G.d.O.P., P.S.M.-S., D.B., A.L.d.R.C. and P.G.R. All authors contributed to the final version of the document. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research and APC were funded by project RAD I of Instituto Tecnológico Vale, including scholarships to A.F.d.C., D.B., I.G.O.P., J.C.M., P.G.R., P.S.M.-S., R.S.G. and R.d.S.S.d.S. Additional support was received from CNPq by S.J.R., grant number 305831/2016-0.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Thacker, S.; Adshead, D.; Fay, M.; Hallegatte, S. Infrastructure for Sustainable Development. Nature 2019, 2, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Adshead, D.; Thacker, S.; Fuldauer, L.I.; Hall, J.W. Delivering on the Sustainable Development Goals through long-term infrastructure planning. Glob. Environ. 2019, 59, 101975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sovacool, B.K.; Ali, S.H.; Bazilian, M.; Radley, B. Sustainable Minerals and Metals for a Low-Carbon Future. Science 2020, 367, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vidal, O.; Goffé, B.; Arndt, N. Metals for a Low-Carbon Society. Nat. Geosci. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sonter, L.J.; Dade, M.C.; Watson, J.E.M.; Valenta, R.K. Renewable Energy Production Will Exacerbate Mining Threats to Biodiversity. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Vyazmensky, A.; Stead, D.; Elmo, D.; Moss, A. Numerical Analysis of Block Caving-Induced Instability in Large Open Pit Slopes: A Finite Element/Discrete Element Approach. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2010, 43, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Z.-Q.; Wu, L.-H.; Liu, T.-T. Revegetation of Steep Rocky Slopes: Planting Climbing Vegetation Species in Artificially Drilled Holes. Ecol. Eng. 2009, 35, 1079–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Umrao, R.K.; Singh, R.; Ahmad, M.; Singh, T.N. Stability Analysis of Cut Slopes Using Continuous Slope Mass Rating and Kinematic Analysis in Rudraprayag District, Uttarakhand. GM 2011, 1, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Suhatril, M.; Osman, N.; Sari, P.A.; Shariati, M. Significance of Surface Eco-Protection Techniques for Cohesive Soils Slope in Selangor, Malaysia. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2019, 37, 2007–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nilsson, T.U. How to Reduce Landslides by Preventive Actions. In Geotechnics for Sustainable Infrastructure Development; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 871–878. [Google Scholar]
  11. Polster, D.F. Soil Bioengineering for Slope Stabilization and Site Restoration. In Proceedings of the Sudbury Mining and the Environment III, Sudbury, ON, Canada, 25–28 May 2003. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, B.-J.; Zhang, G.-H.; Yang, H.-Y.; Wang, H.; Li, N.-N. Soil Erodibility Affected by Vegetation Restoration on Steep Gully Slopes on the Loess Plateau of China. Soil Res. 2018, 56, 712–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, G.; Hu, F.; Zheng, F.; Zhang, Q. Effects and Mechanisms of Erosion Control Techniques on Stairstep Cut-Slopes. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 656, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Duan, L.; Huang, M.; Zhang, L. Differences in Hydrological Responses for Different Vegetation Types on a Steep Slope on the Loess Plateau, China. J. Hydrol. 2016, 537, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gastauer, M.; Silva, J.R.; Caldeira Junior, C.F.; Ramos, S.J.; Souza Filho, P.W.M.; Furtini Neto, A.E.; Siqueira, J.O. Mine Land Rehabilitation: Modern Ecological Approaches for More Sustainable Mining. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 1409–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Urriago-Ospina, L.M.; Jardim, C.M.; Rivera-Fernández, G.; Kozovits, A.R.; Leite, M.G.P.; Messias, M.C.T.B. Traditional Ecological Knowledge in a Ferruginous Ecosystem Management: Lessons for Diversifying Land Use. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2020, 23, 2092–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Woodbury, D.J.; Yassir, I.; Arbainsyah; Doroski, D.A.; Queenborough, S.A.; Ashton, M.S. Filling a Void: Analysis of Early Tropical Soil and Vegetative Recovery under Leguminous, Post-coal Mine Reforestation Plantations in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Land Degrad. Dev. 2020, 31, 473–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Feng, C.; Ai, Y.; Chen, Z.; Liu, H.; Wang, K.; Xiao, J.; Chen, J.; Huang, Z. Spatial Variation of Soil Properties and Plant Colonisation on Cut Slopes: A Case Study in the Semi-Tropical Hilly Areas of China. Plant Ecol. Divers. 2016, 9, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kimball, S.; Lulow, M.; Sorenson, Q.; Balazs, K.; Fang, Y.-C.; Davis, S.J.; O’Connell, M.; Huxman, T.E. Cost-Effective Ecological Restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2015, 23, 800–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Tamura, N.; Lulow, M.E.; Halsch, C.A.; Major, M.R.; Balazs, K.R.; Austin, P.; Huxman, T.E.; Kimball, S. Effectiveness of Seed Sowing Techniques for Sloped Restoration Sites. Restor. Ecol. 2017, 25, 942–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, B.; Liu, D.; Yang, J.; Zhu, Z.; Darboux, F.; Jiao, J.; An, S. Effects of Forest Floor Characteristics on Soil Labile Carbon as Varied by Topography and Vegetation Type in the Chinese Loess Plateau. Catena 2021, 196, 104825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Remaury, A.; Guittonny, M.; Rickson, J. The Effect of Tree Planting Density on the Relative Development of Weeds and Hybrid Poplars on Revegetated Mine Slopes Vulnerable to Erosion. New For. 2019, 50, 555–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, J.; Ouyang, J.; Zhang, M. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil and Vegetation in a Reclaimed Area in an Opencast Coalmine. Catena 2020, 195, 104773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Quan, X.; He, J.; Cai, Q.; Sun, L.; Li, X.; Wang, S. Soil Erosion and Deposition Characteristics of Slope Surfaces for Two Loess Soils Using Indoor Simulated Rainfall Experiment. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 204, 104714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gomes, M.; Ferreira, R.L.; de Ruchkys, Ú.A. Landscape Evolution in Ferruginous Geosystems of the Iron Quadrangle, Brazil: A Speleological Approach in a Biodiversity Hotspot. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Silveira, F.A.O.; Negreiros, D.; Barbosa, N.P.U.; Buisson, E. Ecology and Evolution of Plant Diversity in the Endangered Campo Rupestre: A Neglected Conservation Priority. Plant Soil 2016, 403, 129–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lenoir, I.; Fontaine, J.; Lounès-Hadj Sahraoui, A. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Responses to Abiotic Stresses: A Review. Phytochemistry 2016, 123, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jacott, C.N.; Murray, J.D.; Ridout, C.J. Trade-Offs in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis: Disease Resistance, Growth Responses and Perspectives for Crop Breeding. Agronomy 2017, 7, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. de Quadros, P.D.; Zhalnina, K.; Davis-Richardson, A.G.; Drew, J.C.; Menezes, F.B.; de O. Camargo, F.A.; Triplett, E.W. Coal Mining Practices Reduce the Microbial Biomass, Richness and Diversity of Soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2016, 98, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Stagnari, F.; Galieni, A.; D’Egidio, S.; Pagnani, G.; Pisante, M. Sustainable Soil Management. In Innovations in Sustainable Agriculture; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 105–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kavamura, V.N.; Hayat, R.; Clark, I.M.; Rossmann, M.; Mendes, R.; Hirsch, P.R.; Mauchline, T.H. Inorganic Nitrogen Application Affects Both Taxonomical and Predicted Functional Structure of Wheat Rhizosphere Bacterial Communities. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Francioli, D.; Schulz, E.; Lentendu, G.; Wubet, T.; Buscot, F.; Reitz, T. Mineral vs. Organic Amendments: Microbial Community Structure, Activity and Abundance of Agriculturally Relevant Microbes Are Driven by Long-Term Fertilization Strategies. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, Y.; Shen, H.; He, X.; Thomas, B.W.; Lupwayi, N.Z.; Hao, X.; Thomas, M.C.; Shi, X. Fertilization Shapes Bacterial Community Structure by Alteration of Soil pH. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Zhou, J.; Guan, D.; Zhou, B.; Zhao, B.; Ma, M.; Qin, J.; Jiang, X.; Chen, S.; Cao, F.; Shen, D.; et al. Influence of 34-Years of Fertilization on Bacterial Communities in an Intensively Cultivated Black Soil in Northeast China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 90, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Raphael, J.P.A.; Gazola, B.; Nunes, J.G.S.; Macedo, G.C.; Rosolem, C.A. Cotton Germination and Emergence under High Diurnal Temperatures. Crop Sci. 2017, 57, 2761–2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Aragón-Gastélum, J.L.; Flores, J.; Jurado, E.; Ramírez-Tobías, H.M.; Robles-Díaz, E.; Rodas-Ortiz, J.P.; Yáñez-Espinosa, L. Potential Impact of Global Warming on Seed Bank, Dormancy and Germination of Three Succulent Species from the Chihuahuan Desert. Seed Sci. Res. 2018, 28, 312–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dantas, B.F.; Moura, M.S.B.; Pelacani, C.R.; Angelotti, F.; Taura, T.A.; Oliveira, G.M.; Bispo, J.S.; Matias, J.R.; Silva, F.F.S.; Pritchard, H.W.; et al. Rainfall, Not Soil Temperature, Will Limit the Seed Germination of Dry Forest Species with Climate Change. Oecologia 2020, 192, 529–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yuan, X.; Wen, B. Seed Germination Response to High Temperature and Water Stress in Three Invasive Asteraceae Weeds from Xishuangbanna, SW China. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Araújo, I.C.S.; Costa, M.C.G. Biomass and Nutrient Accumulation Pattern of Leguminous Tree Seedlings Grown on Mine Tailings Amended with Organic Waste. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 60, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Spehn, E.M.; Scherer-Lorenzen, M.; Schmid, B.; Hector, A.; Caldeira, M.C.; Dimitrakopoulos, P.G.; Finn, J.A.; Jumpponen, A.; O’Donnovan, G.; Pereira, J.S.; et al. The Role of Legumes as a Component of Biodiversity in a Cross-European Study of Grassland Biomass Nitrogen. Oikos 2002, 98, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Chen, Z.-H.; Chen, G.; Dai, F.; Wang, Y.; Hills, A.; Ruan, Y.-L.; Zhang, G.; Franks, P.J.; Nevo, E.; Blatt, M.R. Molecular Evolution of Grass Stomata. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 124–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Grant, C.D.; Campbell, C.J.; Charnock, N.R. Selection of Species Suitable for Derelict Mine Site Rehabilitation in New South Wales, Australia. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2002, 139, 215–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Oliveira, G.; Clemente, A.; Nunes, A.; Correia, O. Limitations to Recruitment of Native Species in Hydroseeding Mixtures. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 57, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Candeias, C.; Melo, R.; Ávila, P.F.; Ferreira da Silva, E.; Salgueiro, A.R.; Teixeira, J.P. Heavy Metal Pollution in Mine–soil–plant System in S. Francisco de Assis – Panasqueira Mine (Portugal). Appl. Geochem. 2014, 44, 12–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Ettler, V.; Konečný, L.; Kovářová, L.; Mihaljevič, M.; Šebek, O.; Kříbek, B.; Majer, V.; Veselovský, F.; Penížek, V.; Vaněk, A.; et al. Surprisingly Contrasting Metal Distribution and Fractionation Patterns in Copper Smelter-Affected Tropical Soils in Forested and Grassland Areas (Mufulira, Zambian Copperbelt). Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 473-474, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pourret, O.; Hursthouse, A. It’s Time to Replace the Term “Heavy Metals” with “Potentially Toxic Elements” When Reporting Environmental Research. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Gautam, M.; Agrawal, M. Identification of Metal Tolerant Plant Species for Sustainable Phytomanagement of Abandoned Red Mud Dumps. Appl. Geochem. 2019, 104, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rascio, N.; Navari-Izzo, F. Heavy Metal Hyperaccumulating Plants: How and Why Do They Do It? And What Makes Them so Interesting? Plant Sci. 2011, 180, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Krzciuk, K.; Gałuszka, A. Prospecting for Hyperaccumulators of Trace Elements: A Review. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2015, 35, 522–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, L.; Hou, D.; Shen, Z.; Zhu, J.; Jia, X.; Ok, Y.S.; Tack, F.M.G.; Rinklebe, J. Field Trials of Phytomining and Phytoremediation: A Critical Review of Influencing Factors and Effects of Additives. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 50, 2724–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ashraf, S.; Ali, Q.; Zahir, Z.A.; Ashraf, S.; Asghar, H.N. Phytoremediation: Environmentally Sustainable Way for Reclamation of Heavy Metal Polluted Soils. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 174, 714–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Saxena, G.; Purchase, D.; Mulla, S.I.; Saratale, G.D.; Bharagava, R.N. Phytoremediation of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Sites: Eco-Environmental Concerns, Field Studies, Sustainability Issues, and Future Prospects. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 249; de Voogt, P., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 71–131. ISBN 9783030201944. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhao, X.; Li, Z.; Zhu, D.; Zhu, Q.; Robeson, M.D.; Hu, J. Revegetation Using the Deep Planting of Container Seedlings to Overcome the Limitations Associated with Topsoil Desiccation on Exposed Steep Earthy Road Slopes in the Semiarid Loess Region of China. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 2797–2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chirino, E.; Vilagrosa, A.; Hernández, E.I.; Matos, A.; Vallejo, V.R. Effects of a Deep Container on Morpho-Functional Characteristics and Root Colonization in Quercus suber L. Seedlings for Reforestation in Mediterranean Climate. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 256, 779–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nyenda, T.; Gwenzi, W.; Gwata, C.; Jacobs, S.M. Leguminous Tree Species Create Islands of Fertility and Influence the Understory Vegetation on Nickel-Mine Tailings of Different Ages. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 155, 105902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Banerjee, R.; Goswami, P.; Mukherjee, A. Chapter 22—Stabilization of Iron Ore Mine Spoil Dump Sites With Vetiver System. In Bio-Geotechnologies for Mine Site Rehabilitation; Prasad, M.N.V., de Campos Favas, P.J., Maiti, S.K., Eds.; Elsevier: Amserdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 393–413. ISBN 9780128129869. [Google Scholar]
  57. Landl, M.; Schnepf, A.; Uteau, D.; Peth, S.; Athmann, M.; Kautz, T.; Perkons, U.; Vereecken, H.; Vanderborght, J. Modeling the Impact of Biopores on Root Growth and Root Water Uptake. Vadose Zone J. 2019, 18, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. dos Santos, K.F.; Barbosa, F.T.; Bertol, I.; De Souza Werner, R.; Wolschick, N.H.; Mota, J.M. Study of Soil Physical Properties and Water Infiltration Rates in Different Types of Land Use. Semina Ciências Agrárias 2018, 39, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Gastauer, M.; Sarmento, P.S.M.; Santos, V.C.A.; Caldeira, C.F.; Ramos, S.J.; Teodoro, G.S.; Siqueira, J.O. Vegetative Functional Traits Guide Plant Species Selection for Initial Mineland Rehabilitation. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 148, 1057–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hubbell, S.P.; Foster, R.B.; O’Brien, S.T.; Harms, K.E.; Condit, R.; Wechsler, B.; Wright, S.J.; de Lao, S.L. Light-Gap Disturbances, Recruitment Limitation, and Tree Diversity in a Neotropical Forest. Science 1999, 283, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Laroche, F.; Jarne, P.; Perrot, T.; Massol, F. The Evolution of the Competition–dispersal Trade-off Affects α- and β-Diversity in a Heterogeneous Metacommunity. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2016, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Shoemaker, L.G.; Melbourne, B.A. Linking Metacommunity Paradigms to Spatial Coexistence Mechanisms. Ecology 2016, 97, 2436–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Boukili, V.K.; Chazdon, R.L. Environmental Filtering, Local Site Factors and Landscape Context Drive Changes in Functional Trait Composition during Tropical Forest Succession. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2017, 24, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Schrama, M.; Jouta, J.; Berg, M.P.; Olff, H. Food Web Assembly at the Landscape Scale: Using Stable Isotopes to Reveal Changes in Trophic Structure During Succession. Ecosystems 2013, 16, 627–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jangid, K.; Whitman, W.B.; Condron, L.M.; Turner, B.L.; Williams, M.A. Soil Bacterial Community Succession during Long-Term Ecosystem Development. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22, 3415–3424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Prach, K.; Hobbs, R.J. Spontaneous Succession versus Technical Reclamation in the Restoration of Disturbed Sites. Restor. Ecol. 2008, 16, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Walker, L.R.; Velázquez, E.; Shiels, A.B. Applying Lessons from Ecological Succession to the Restoration of Landslides. Plant Soil 2009, 324, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Walker, L.R.; Walker, J.; Hobbs, R.J. Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2007; pp. 1–190. ISBN 9780387353029. [Google Scholar]
  69. Wali, M.K. Ecological Succession and the Rehabilitation of Disturbed Terrestrial Ecosystems. Plant Soil 1999, 213, 195–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chang, C.C.; Turner, B.L. Ecological Succession in a Changing World. J. Ecol. 2019, 107, 503–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Prach, K.; Walker, L.R. Four Opportunities for Studies of Ecological Succession. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Walker, L.R.; Shiels, A.B.; Bellingham, P.J.; Sparrow, A.D.; Fetcher, N.; Landau, F.H.; Lodge, D.J. Changes in Abiotic Influences on Seed Plants and Ferns during 18 Years of Primary Succession on Puerto Rican Landslides. J. Ecol. 2013, 101, 650–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Giupponi, L.; Bischetti, G.B.; Giorgi, A. A Proposal for Assessing the Success of Soil Bioengineering Work by Analysing Vegetation: Results of Two Case Studies in the Italian Alps. Landsc. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 13, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Smale, M.C.; McLeod, M.; Smale, P.N. Vegetation and Soil Recovery on Shallow Landslide Scars in Tertiary Hill Country, East Cape Region, New Zealand. N. Z. J. Ecol. 1997, 21, 31–41. [Google Scholar]
  75. Hess, M.C.M.; Mesléard, F.; Buisson, E. Priority Effects: Emerging Principles for Invasive Plant Species Management. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 127, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Nakileza, B.R.; Tushabe, H. Determinants of Revegetation on Landslide Scars in an Agro-Based Socio-Ecological System in Bududa, Uganda. Int. J. Biodivers. Conserv. 2018, 10, 444–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Loreau, M. Does Functional Redundancy Exist? Oikos 2004, 104, 606–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Rosière, C.A.; Chemale, F., Jr. Brazilian Iron Formations and Their Geological Setting. Rev. Bras. Geociências 2000, 30, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Weidlich, E.W.A.; Flórido, F.G.; Sorrini, T.B.; Brancalion, P.H.S. Controlling Invasive Plant Species in Ecological Restoration: A Global Review. J. Appl. Ecol. 2020, 57, 1806–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chau, N.L.; Chu, L.M. Revegetation of Subtropical Soil Slopes: Groundcover Performance and the Implications of Urban Development and Slope Features on Plant Community. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2018, 21, 658–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chau, N.L.; Chu, L.M. Fern Cover and the Importance of Plant Traits in Reducing Erosion on Steep Soil Slopes. Catena 2017, 151, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Peng, K.; Luo, C.; You, W.; Lian, C.; Li, X.; Shen, Z. Manganese Uptake and Interactions with Cadmium in the Hyperaccumulator—Phytolacca Americana L. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 154, 674–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yang, Q.-W.; Ke, H.-M.; Liu, S.-J.; Zeng, Q. Phytoremediation of Mn-Contaminated Paddy Soil by Two Hyperaccumulators (Phytolacca Americana and Polygonum Hydropiper) Aided with Citric Acid. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 25933–25941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Liu, W.-S.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Huot, H.; Liu, C.; Guo, M.-N.; Qiu, R.-L.; Morel, J.L.; Tang, Y.-T. Phytoextraction of Rare Earth Elements from Ion-Adsorption Mine Tailings by Phytolacca Americana: Effects of Organic Material and Biochar Amendment. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 275, 122959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fu, X.; Dou, C.; Chen, Y.; Chen, X.; Shi, J.; Yu, M.; Xu, J. Subcellular Distribution and Chemical Forms of Cadmium in Phytolacca Americana L. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. He, J.-S.; Flynn, D.F.B.; Wolfe-Bellin, K.; Fang, J.; Bazzaz, F.A. CO2 and Nitrogen, but Not Population Density, Alter the Size and C/N Ratio of Phytolacca Americana Seeds. Funct. Ecol. 2005, 19, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Diaz-Toribio, M.H.; Putz, F.E. Clear-Cuts Are Not Clean Slates: Residual Vegetation Impediments to Savanna Restoration. Castanea 2017, 82, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Pepe, M.; Gratani, L.; Fabrini, G.; Varone, L. Seed Germination Traits of Ailanthus Altissima, Phytolacca Americana and Robinia Pseudoacacia in Response to Different Thermal and Light Requirements. Plant Species Biol. 2020, 37, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pyšek, P.; Pergl, J.; van Kleunen, M.; Dawson, W.; Essl, F.; Kreft, H.; Weigelt, P.; Wilson, J.R.; Winter, M.; Richardson, D.M. South Africa as a Donor of Naturalised and Invasive Plants to Other Parts of the World. In Biological Invasions in South Africa; van Wilgen, B.W., Measey, J., Richardson, D.M., Wilson, J.R., Zengeya, T.A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 759–785. ISBN 9783030323943. [Google Scholar]
  90. Kurtz, B.C.; Souza, V.C.; Magalhães, A.M.; de Paula-Souza, J.; Duarte, A.R.; Joaquim-Jr, G.O. The Vascular Flora and Vegetation of Queimada Grande Island, São Paulo State, Southeastern Brazil. Biota Neotrop. 2017, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Rocha-Nicoleite, E.; Campos, M.L.; Colombo, G.T.; Overbeck, G.E.; Müller, S.C. Forest Restoration after Severe Degradation by Coal Mining: Lessons from the First Years of Monitoring. Rev. Bras. Bot. 2018, 41, 653–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zenni, R.D.; Sampaio, A.B.; Lima, Y.P.; Pessoa-Filho, M.; Lins, T.C.L.; Pivello, V.R.; Daehler, C. Invasive Melinis Minutiflora Outperforms Native Species, but the Magnitude of the Effect Is Context-Dependent. Biol. Invasions 2019, 21, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Damasceno, G.; Souza, L.; Pivello, V.R.; Gorgone-Barbosa, E.; Giroldo, P.Z.; Fidelis, A. Impact of Invasive Grasses on Cerrado under Natural Regeneration. Biol. Invasions 2018, 20, 3621–3629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. de Souza, C.M.P.; Francelino, M.R.; da Costa, L.M.; Fernandes Filho, E.I. Pastures Degradation and the Relation with Pedo-Geomorphological Attributes in Watershed. Floresta Ambient. 2019, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Nascimento, M.C.; Riva, R.D.D.; da S. Chagas, C.; de Oliveira, H.; Dias, L.E.; Fernandes Filho, E.I.; Soares, V.P. Uso de imagens do sensor ASTER na identificação de níveis de degradação em pastagens. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Ambient./Braz. J. Agric. Environ. Eng. 2006, 10, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Osawa, R. Road-Kills of the Swamp Wallaby, Wallabia-Bicolor, on North-Stradbroke-Island, Southeast Queensland. Wildl. Res. 1989, 16, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Citadini-Zanette, V.; Negrelle, R.R.B.; Leal-Filho, L.S.; Remor, R.; Elias, G.A.; Santos, R. Mimosa Scabrella Benth. (Fabaceae) enhances the restoration in coal mining areas in the atlantic rainforest. CERNE 2017, 23, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sharpe, J.; Mehltreter, K.; Walker, L. Ecological Importance Offerns. Fern Ecol. 2010, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  99. Campos, N.V.; Arcanjo-Silva, S.; Viana, I.B.; Batista, B.L.; Barbosa, F.; Loureiro, M.E.; Ribeiro, C.; Azevedo, A.A. Arsenic-Induced Responses in Pityrogramma calomelanos (L.) Link: Arsenic Speciation, Mineral Nutrition and Antioxidant Defenses. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 97, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Mah, C.H.; Wang, Y.; Lee, S.H.; Chen, Z.; Yong, J.W.H.; Tan, S.N. Pityrogramma calomelanos (L.) Link: Silver Fern as a Copper Excluder Plant. Trop. Plant Res. 2019, 6, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Fleming, T.H.; Williams, C.F.; Bonaccorso, F.J.; Herbst, L.H. Phenology, seed dispersal, and colonization in muntingia calabura, a neotropical pioneer tree. Am. J. Bot. 1985, 72, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. de Figueiredo, R.A.; de Oliveira, A.A.; Zacharias, M.A.; Barbosa, S.M.; Pereira, F.F.; Cazela, G.N.; Viana, J.P.; de Camargo, R.A. Reproductive Ecology of the Exotic Tree Muntingia calabura L. (Muntingiaceae) in Southeastern Brazil. Rev. Árvore 2008, 32, 993–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cao, Y.; Wang, J.; Bai, Z.; Zhou, W.; Zhao, Z.; Ding, X.; Li, Y. Differentiation and Mechanisms on Physical Properties of Reconstructed Soils on Open-Cast Mine Dump of Loess Area. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 74, 6367–6380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Van Etten, E.J.B. The role and value of riparian vegetation for mine pit lakes. In Mine Pit Lakes: Closure and Management; McCullough, C.D., Ed.; Australian Centre for Geomechanics: Nedlands, Australia, 2011; pp. 91–106. [Google Scholar]
  105. Fields-Johnson, C.W.; Zipper, C.E.; Burger, J.A.; Evans, D.M. Forest Restoration on Steep Slopes after Coal Surface Mining in Appalachian USA: Soil Grading and Seeding Effects. For. Ecol. Manag. 2012, 270, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Latocha, A.; Szymanowski, M.; Jeziorska, J.; Stec, M.; Roszczewska, M. Effects of Land Abandonment and Climate Change on Soil erosion—An Example from Depopulated Agricultural Lands in the Sudetes Mts., SW Poland. Catena 2016, 145, 128–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Clemente, A.S.; Werner, C.; Maguas, C.; Cabral, M.S.; Martins-Loucao, M.A.; Correia, O. Restoration of a Limestone Quarry: Effect of Soil Amendments on the Establishment of Native Mediterranean Sclerophyllous Shrubs. Restor. Ecol. 2004, 12, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hosogi, D.; Yoshinaga, C.; Nakamura, K.; Kameyama, A. Revegetation of an Artificial Cut-Slope by Seeds Dispersed from the Surrounding Vegetation. Landsc. Ecol. Eng. 2006, 2, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Feng, Y.; Wang, J.; Bai, Z.; Reading, L. Effects of Surface Coal Mining and Land Reclamation on Soil Properties: A Review. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2019, 191, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Dabrowski, J.; Venter, G.; Truter, W.F.; Scholtz, C.H. Dung Beetles Can Tunnel into Highly Compacted Soils from Reclaimed Mined Sites in eMalahleni, South Africa. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2019, 134, 116–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ampoorter, E.; De Schrijver, A.; De Frenne, P.; Hermy, M.; Verheyen, K. Experimental Assessment of Ecological Restoration Options for Compacted Forest Soils. Ecol. Eng. 2011, 37, 1734–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Tormo, J.; Bochet, E.; García-Fayos, P. Roadfill Revegetation in Semiarid Mediterranean Environments. Part II: Topsoiling, Species Selection, and Hydroseeding. Restor. Ecol. 2007, 15, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Gastauer, M.; Caldeira, C.F.; Ramos, S.J.; Silva, D.F.; Siqueira, J. Active Rehabilitation of Amazonian Sand Mines Converges Soils, Plant Communities and Environmental Status to Their Predisturbance Levels. Land Degrad. Dev. 2019, 31, 607–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ribeiro, R.A.; Giannini, T.C.; Gastauer, M.; Awade, M.; Siqueira, J.O. Topsoil Application during the Rehabilitation of a Manganese Tailing Dam Increases Plant Taxonomic, Phylogenetic and Functional Diversity. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 227, 386–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Hu, Z.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, X.; Li, Y. Preparation of Topsoil Alternatives for Open-Pit Coal Mines in the Hulunbuir Grassland Area, China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020, 147, 103431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Dikinya, O. Heavy Metals and Radionuclide Status and Characterisation of Pre-Mined Soils in Serule, North East Botswana. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 73, 5405–5413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Coello, J.; Pique, M. Soil Conditioners and Groundcovers for Sustainable and Cost-Efficient Tree Planting in Europe and the The Mediterranean-Technical Guide; Centre Tecnològic Forestal de Catalunya: Lérida, Spain, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  118. Ribeiro, P.G.; da S. Aragão, O.O.; Martins, G.C.; Rodrigues, M.; Souza, J.M.P.; de S. Moreira, F.M.; Li, Y.C.; Guilherme, L.R.G. Hydrothermally-Altered Feldspar Reduces Metal Toxicity and Promotes Plant Growth in Highly Metal-Contaminated Soils. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Blanco-Canqui, H. Does Biochar Application Alleviate Soil Compaction? Review and Data Synthesis. Geoderma 2021, 404, 115317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Rowe, E.C.; Williamson, J.C.; Jones, D.L.; Holliman, P.; Healey, J.R. Initial Tree Establishment on Blocky Quarry Waste Ameliorated with Hydrogel or Slate Processing Fines. J. Environ. Qual. 2005, 34, 994–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Montesano, F.F.; Parente, A.; Santamaria, P.; Sannino, A.; Serio, F. Biodegradable Superabsorbent Hydrogel IncreasesWater Retention Properties of Growing Media and Plant Growth. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia 2015, 4, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Kebede, B.; Tsunekawa, A.; Haregeweyn, N.; Mamedov, A.I.; Tsubo, M.; Fenta, A.A.; Meshesha, D.T.; Masunaga, T.; Adgo, E.; Abebe, G.; et al. Effectiveness of Polyacrylamide in Reducing Runoff and Soil Loss under Consecutive Rainfall Storms. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 2020, 12, 1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Apostol, K.G.; Jacobs, D.F.; Kasten Dumroese, R. Root Desiccation and Drought Stress Responses of Bareroot Quercus Rubra Seedlings Treated with a Hydrophilic Polymer Root Dip. Plant Soil. 2009, 315, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Hüttermann, A.; Orikiriza, L.J.B.; Agaba, H. Application of Superabsorbent Polymers for Improving the Ecological Chemistry of Degraded or Polluted Lands. Clean Soil Air Water 2009, 37, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Mudhanganyi, A.; Ndagurwa, H.G.T.; Maravanyika, C.; Mwase, R. The Influence of Hydrogel Soil Amendment on the Survival and Growth of Newly Transplanted Pinus Patula Seedlings. Res. J. For. 2018, 29, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Orikiriza, L.J.B.; Agaba, H.; Tweheyo, M.; Eilu, G.; Kabasa, J.D.; Hüttermann, A. Amending Soils with Hydrogels Increases the Biomass of Nine Tree Species under Non-Water Stress Conditions. Clean Soil Air Water 2009, 37, 615–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Naeth, M.A.; Cohen Fernández, A.C.; Mollard, F.P.O.; Yao, L.; Wilkinson, S.R.; Jiao, Z. Enriched Topographic Microsites for Improved Native Grass and Forb Establishment in Reclamation. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 71, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Miller, V.S.; Naeth, M.A. Amendments to Improve Plant Response under Simulated Water-Limited Conditions in Diamond Mine Anthroposols. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2020, 101, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Obert, J.C.; Kohn, F.C.; Neumann, D.L.; Asrar, J. Treatment of Seeds with Coatings Containing Hydrogel. U.S. Patent US6557298B2, 6 May 2003. [Google Scholar]
  130. Medl, A.; Florineth, F.; Kikuta, S.B.; Mayr, S. Irrigation of “Green Walls” Is Necessary to Avoid Drought Stress of Grass Vegetation (Phleum pratense L.). Ecol. Eng. 2018, 113, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Monteiro, J.; Brilhante, M.; Domingues, I.; Amaro, R.; Gonçalves, D.; Cavaco, T.; Fonseca, G.; Serrano, H.C.; Branquinho, C. A Tale of Two Green Walls: A Functional Trait Approach to Assess Vegetation Establishment on Restored Steep Slopes. Restor. Ecol. 2020, 28, 687–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Guo, Y.; He, J. Influence of Irrigation Canal Construction on the Stability of A Natural High and Steep Slope. In Proceedings of the 2020 7th International Conference on Advanced Composite Materials and Manufacturing Engineering (ACMME 2020), Yunnan, China, 20–21 June 2020; Volume 914, p. 012036. [Google Scholar]
  133. Cummins, P.R. Irrigation and the Palu Landslides. Nat. Geosci. 2019, 12, 881–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Pei, P.; Zhao, Y.; Ni, P.; Mei, G. A Protective Measure for Expansive Soil Slopes Based on Moisture Content Control. Eng. Geol. 2020, 269, 105527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Lacroix, P.; Dehecq, A.; Taipe, E. Irrigation-Triggered Landslides in a Peruvian Desert Caused by Modern Intensive Farming. Nat. Geosci. 2019, 13, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Lian, B.; Peng, J.; Zhan, H.; Huang, Q.; Wang, X.; Hu, S. Formation Mechanism Analysis of Irrigation-Induced Retrogressive Loess Landslides. Catena 2020, 195, 104441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ferez, A.P.C.; Campoe, O.C.; Mendes, J.C.T.; Stape, J.L. Silvicultural Opportunities for Increasing Carbon Stock in Restoration of Atlantic Forests in Brazil. For. Ecol. Manag. 2015, 350, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Oliet, J.A.; Artero, F.; Cuadros, S.; Puértolas, J.; Luna, L.; Grau, J.M. Deep Planting with Shelters Improves Performance of Different Stocktype Sizes under Arid Mediterranean Conditions. New For. 2012, 43, 925–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. de Oliveira, V.P.; Martins, W.B.R.; de M. Rodrigues, J.I.; Silva, A.R.; do C.A. Lopes, J.; de Lima Neto, J.F.; Schwartz, G. Are Liming and Pit Size Determining for Tree Species Establishment in Degraded Areas by Kaolin Mining? Ecol. Eng. 2022, 178, 106599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Jiménez, M.N.; Pinto, J.R.; Ripoll, M.A.; Sánchez-Miranda, A.; Navarro, F.B. Impact of Straw and Rock-Fragment Mulches on Soil Moisture and Early Growth of Holm Oaks in a Semiarid Area. Catena 2017, 152, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Albaladejo Montoro, J.; Alvarez Rogel, J.; Querejeta, J.; Díaz, E.; Castillo, V. Three Hydro-Seeding Revegetation Techniques for Soil Erosion Control on Anthropic Steep Slopes. Land Degrad. Dev. 2000, 11, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Beggy, H.M.; Fehmi, J.S. Effect of Surface Roughness and Mulch on Semi-Arid Revegetation Success, Soil Chemistry and Soil Movement. Catena 2016, 143, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Matesanz, S.; Valladares, F.; Tena, D.; Costa-Tenorio, M.; Bote, D. Early Dynamics of Plant Communities on Revegetated Motorway Slopes from Southern Spain: Is Hydroseeding Always Needed? Restor. Ecol. 2006, 14, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Mola, I.; Jiménez, M.D.; López-Jiménez, N.; Casado, M.A.; Balaguer, L. Roadside Reclamation Outside the Revegetation Season: Management Options under Schedule Pressure. Restor. Ecol. 2011, 19, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ballesteros, M.; Cañadas, E.M.; Marrs, R.H.; Foronda, A.; Martín-Peinado, F.J.; Lorite, J. Restoration of Gypsicolous Vegetation on Quarry Slopes: Guidance for Hydroseeding under Contrasting Inclination and Aspect: Restoration of Gypsicolous Vegetation on Quarry Slopes. Land Degrad. Dev. 2017, 28, 2146–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Said, K.O.; Onifade, M.; Githiria, J.M.; Abdulsalam, J.; Bodunrin, M.O.; Genc, B.; Johnson, O.; Akande, J.M. On the Application of Drones: A Progress Report in Mining Operations. Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 2021, 35, 235–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Shahmoradi, J.; Talebi, E.; Roghanchi, P.; Hassanalian, M. A Comprehensive Review of Applications of Drone Technology in the Mining Industry. Drones 2020, 4, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Buters, T.; Belton, D.; Cross, A. Seed and Seedling Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Automated Image Classification in the Monitoring of Ecological Recovery. Drones 2019, 3, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Mitchell, D.J.; Barton, A.P.; Fullen, M.A.; Hocking, T.J.; Zhi, W.B.; Yi, Z. Field Studies of the Effects of Jute Geotextiles on Runoff and Erosion in Shropshire, UK. Soil Use Manag. 2006, 19, 182–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. de J. Alves, L.; Nunes, F.C.; Prasad, M.N.V.; Mangabeira, P.A.O.; Gross, E.; Loureiro, D.M.; Medrado, H.H.S.; Bomfim, P.S.F. Chapter 17—Uranium Mine Waste Phytostabilization With Native Plants—A Case Study From Brazil. In Bio-Geotechnologies for Mine Site Rehabilitation; Prasad, M.N.V., de Favas, P.J.C., Maiti, S.K., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 299–322. [Google Scholar]
  151. Rickson, R.J. Controlling Sediment at Source: An Evaluation of Erosion Control Geotextiles. Earth Surf. Processes Landf. 2006, 31, 550–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Holanda, F.S.R.; da Rocha, I.P.; Oliveira, V.S. Riverbank Stabilization with Soil Bioengineering Techniques at the Lower São Francisco River. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Ambient./Braz. J. Agric. Environ. Eng. 2008, 12, 570–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Methacanon, P.; Weerawatsophon, U.; Sumransin, N.; Prahsarn, C.; Bergado, D.T. Properties and Potential Application of the Selected Natural Fibers as Limited Life Geotextiles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82, 1090–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Ranjan, V.; Sen, P.; Kumar, D.; Sarsawat, A. A Review on Dump Slope Stabilization by Revegetation with Reference to Indigenous Plant. Ecol. Processes 2015, 4, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Bhat, T.A.; Kumar, R.; Adil Dar, M.; Raju, J. Effect of Sugarcane Molasses on Properties of Geopolymer Concrete. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Sustainable Waste Management through Design, Ludhiana, India, 2–3 November 2018; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 210–216. [Google Scholar]
  156. Cislaghi, A.; Sala, P.; Borgonovo, G.; Gandolfi, C.; Bischetti, G.B. Towards More Sustainable Materials for Geo-Environmental Engineering: The Case of Geogrids. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 2021, 13, 2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Jeon, H.-Y. 18—Geotextile Composites Having Multiple Functions. In Geotextiles; Koerner, R.M., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2016; pp. 413–425. ISBN 9780081002216. [Google Scholar]
  158. Dall’Agnol, R.F.; Bournaud, C.; de Faria, S.M.; Béna, G.; Moulin, L.; Hungria, M. Genetic Diversity of Symbiotic Paraburkholderia Species Isolated from Nodules of Mimosa pudica (L.) and Phaseolus vulgaris (L.) Grown in Soils of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest (Mata Atlântica). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2017, 93, fix027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  159. van der Heijden, M.G.A.; Bardgett, R.D.; van Straalen, N.M. The Unseen Majority: Soil Microbes as Drivers of Plant Diversity and Productivity in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11, 296–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Moreira, F.M.; Haukka, K.; Young, J.P. Biodiversity of Rhizobia Isolated from a Wide Range of Forest Legumes in Brazil. Mol. Ecol. 1998, 7, 889–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Lopez, B.D.O.; dos Santos Teixeira, A.F.; Michel, D.C.; Guimarães, A.A.; da Costa, A.M.; Costa, J.S.; de Souza Pereira, M.; Duarte, B.L.M.; de Souza Moreira, F.M. Genetic and Symbiotic Characterization of Rhizobia Nodulating Legumes in a Mining Area in Southeast Brazil. Sci. Agric. 2021, 79, e20200238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Bi, Y.; Wu, C.; Wang, S.; Gao, X.; Xue, C.; Yang, W.; Li, M.; Xiao, L.; Christie, P. Combined Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inoculation and Loess Amendment Improve Rooting and Revegetation Post-Mining. Rhizosphere 2022, 23, 100560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Fernández-Lizarazo, J.C.; Moreno-Fonseca, L.P. Mechanisms for Tolerance to Water-Deficit Stress in Plants Inoculated with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. A Review. Agron. Colomb. 2016, 34, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Chagnon, P.-L.; Bradley, R.L.; Maherali, H.; Klironomos, J.N. A Trait-Based Framework to Understand Life History of Mycorrhizal Fungi. Trends Plant Sci. 2013, 18, 484–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Lopes Leal, P.; Varón-López, M.; Gonçalves de Oliveira Prado, I.; Valentim Dos Santos, J.; Fonsêca Sousa Soares, C.R.; Siqueira, J.O.; de Souza Moreira, F.M. Enrichment of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in a Contaminated Soil after Rehabilitation. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47, 853–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Yamaji, K.; Watanabe, Y.; Masuya, H.; Shigeto, A.; Yui, H.; Haruma, T. Root Fungal Endophytes Enhance Heavy-Metal Stress Tolerance of Clethra Barbinervis Growing Naturally at Mining Sites via Growth Enhancement, Promotion of Nutrient Uptake and Decrease of Heavy-Metal Concentration. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0169089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  167. Borges, W.L.; Prin, Y.; Ducousso, M.; Roux, C.L.; De Faria, S.M. Rhizobial Characterization in Revegetated Areas after Bauxite Mining. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  168. Becerra, A.G.; Diván, A.; Renison, D. Bare Soil Cover and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Community in the First Montane Forest Restoration in Central Argentina. Restor. Ecol. 2019, 35, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. dos Santos Teixeira, A.F.; Kemmelmeier, K.; Marascalchi, M.N.; Stürmer, S.L.; Carneiro, M.A.C.; de Souza Moreira, F.M. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Communities in an Iron Mining Area and Its Surroundings: Inoculum Potential, Density, and Diversity of Spores Related to Soil Properties. Ciência E Agrotecnologia 2017, 41, 511–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Santos, M.S.; Nogueira, M.A.; Hungria, M. Microbial Inoculants: Reviewing the Past, Discussing the Present and Previewing an Outstanding Future for the Use of Beneficial Bacteria in Agriculture. AMB Express 2019, 9, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Skousen, J.; Zipper, C.E. Revegetation Species and Practices; Virginia Cooperative Extension Publication: Virginia Blacksburg, VA, USA, 2010; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  172. Bochet, E.; Poesen, J.; Rubio, J.L. Runoff and Soil Loss under Individual Plants of a Semi-Arid Mediterranean Shrubland: Influence of Plant Morphology and Rainfall Intensity. Earth Surf. Processes Landf. 2006, 31, 536–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Carrión, J.F.; Gastauer, M.; Mota, N.M.; Meira-Neto, J.A.A. Facilitation as a Driver of Plant Assemblages in Caatinga. J. Arid Environ. 2017, 142, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Ginocchio, R.; León-Lobos, P.; Arellano, E.C.; Anic, V.; Ovalle, J.F.; Baker, A.J.M. Soil Physicochemical Factors as Environmental Filters for Spontaneous Plant Colonization of Abandoned Tailing Dumps. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017, 24, 13484–13496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Beikircher, B.; Florineth, F.; Mayr, S. Restoration of Rocky Slopes Based on Planted Gabions and Use of Drought-Preconditioned Woody Species. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Le Stradic, D.; Fernandes, G.W. The role of native woody species in the restoration of Campos Rupestres in quarries. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2014, 17, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Couto, D.R.; Francisco, T.M.; Garbin, M.L.; Dias, H.M.; Pereira, M.C.A.; Neto, L.M.; Pezzopane, J.E.M. Surface Roots as a New Ecological Zone for Occurrence of Vascular Epiphytes: A Case Study on Pseudobombax Trees on Inselbergs. Plant Ecol. 2019, 220, 1071–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Boanares, D.; Kozovits, A.R.; Lemos-Filho, J.P.; Isaias, R.M.S.; Solar, R.R.R.; Duarte, A.A.; Vilas-Boas, T.; França, M.G.C. Foliar Water-Uptake Strategies Are Related to Leaf Water Status and Gas Exchange in Plants from a Ferruginous Rupestrian Field. Am. J. Bot. 2019, 106, 935–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Boanares, D.; Jovelina da-Silva, C.; Mary Dos Santos Isaias, R.; Costa França, M.G. Oxidative Metabolism in Plants from Brazilian Rupestrian Fields and Its Relation with Foliar Water Uptake in Dry and Rainy Seasons. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 146, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Godefroid, S.; Koedam, N. Interspecific Variation in Soil Compaction Sensitivity among Forest Floor Species. Biol. Conserv. 2004, 119, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Kinugasa, T.; Shirakawa, S. Interspecific Variation in Root Penetration Abilities of 15 Wild Plants in the Mongolian Steppe. J. Arid Environ. 2019, 173, 104010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Bassett, I.E.; Simcock, R.C.; Mitchell, N.D. Consequences of Soil Compaction for Seedling Establishment: Implications for Natural Regeneration and Restoration. Austral Ecol. 2005, 30, 827–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Simpson, K.J.; Bennett, C.; Atkinson, R.R.L.; Mockford, E.J.; McKenzie, S.; Freckleton, R.P.; Thompson, K.; Rees, M.; Osborne, C.P. C4 Photosynthesis and the Economic Spectra of Leaf and Root Traits Independently Influence Growth Rates in Grasses. J. Ecol. 2020, 108, 1899–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Nardini, A. Hard and Tough: The Coordination between Leaf Mechanical Resistance and Drought Tolerance. Flora 2022, 288, 152023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Dong, J.; Hunt, J.; Delhaize, E.; Zheng, S.J.; Jin, C.W.; Tang, C. Impacts of Elevated CO2 on Plant Resistance to Nutrient Deficiency and Toxic Ions via Root Exudates: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 142434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Riaz, M.; Kamran, M.; Fang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Cao, H.; Yang, G.; Deng, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Anastopoulos, I.; et al. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi-Induced Mitigation of Heavy Metal Phytotoxicity in Metal Contaminated Soils: A Critical Review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 402, 123919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Saatkamp, A.; Cochrane, A.; Commander, L.; Guja, L.K.; Jimenez-Alfaro, B.; Larson, J.; Nicotra, A.; Poschlod, P.; Silveira, F.A.O.; Cross, A.T.; et al. A Research Agenda for Seed-Trait Functional Ecology. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 1764–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  188. Piotto, D.; Flesher, K.; Nunes, A.C.P.; Rolim, S.; Ashton, M.; Montagnini, F. Restoration Plantings of Non-Pioneer Tree Species in Open Fields, Young Secondary Forests, and Rubber Plantations in Bahia, Brazil. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 474, 118389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. de J. Rocha, K.C.; Goldenberg, R.; Meirelles, J.; Viana, P.L. Flora das cangas da Serra dos Carajás, Pará, Brasil: Melastomataceae. Rodriguésia 2017, 68, 997–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Cruz, A.P.O.; Viana, P.L.; Santos, J.U. Flora das cangas da Serra dos Carajás, Pará, Brasil: Asteraceae. Rodriguésia 2016, 67, 1211–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Jourgholami, M.; Ghassemi, T.; Labelle, E.R. Soil Physio-Chemical and Biological Indicators to Evaluate the Restoration of Compacted Soil Following Reforestation. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 101, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Kim, S.; Zang, H.; Mortimer, P.; Shi, L.; Li, Y.; Xu, J.; Ostermann, A. Tree Species and Recovery Time Drives Soil Restoration after Mining: A Chronosequence Study. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 1738–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Fu, S.; Wei, C.; Xiao, Y.; Li, L.; Wu, D. Heavy Metals Uptake and Transport by Native Wild Plants: Implications for Phytoremediation and Restoration. Environ. Earth Sci. 2019, 78, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Araujo, T.O.d.; Isaure, M.-P.; Alchoubassi, G.; Bierla, K.; Szpunar, J.; Trcera, N.; Chay, S.; Alcon, C.; Campos da Silva, L.; Curie, C.; et al. Paspalum Urvillei and Setaria Parviflora, Two Grasses Naturally Adapted to Extreme Iron-Rich Environments. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 151, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. De Oliveira Mota, N.F.; Watanabe, M.T.C.; Zappi, D.C.; Hiura, A.L.; Pallos, J.; Viveros, R.S.; Giulietti, A.M.; Viana, P.L. Amazon Canga: The Unique Vegetation of Carajás Revealed by the List of Seed Plants. Rodriguesia 2018, 69, 1435–1488. [Google Scholar]
  196. Schettini, A.T.; Leite, M.G.P.; Messias, M.C.T.B.; Gauthier, A.; Li, H.; Kozovits, A.R. Exploring Al, Mn and Fe Phytoextraction in 27 Ferruginous Rocky Outcrops Plant Species. Flora 2018, 238, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Carvalho, C.S.; Lanes, É.C.M.; Silva, A.R.; Caldeira, C.F.; Carvalho-Filho, N.; Gastauer, M.; Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.L.; Nascimento Júnior, W.; Oliveira, G.; Siqueira, J.O.; et al. Habitat Loss Does Not Always Entail Negative Genetic Consequences. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Agbenin, J.O.; Adeniyi, T. The Microbial Biomass Properties of a Savanna Soil under Improved Grass and Legume Pastures in Northern Nigeria. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 109, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Cao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, H.; Yuan, J.; Zhu, Y.; Liang, Y. Grass Hedge Effects on Controlling Soil Loss from Concentrated Flow: A Case Study in the Red Soil Region of China. Soil Tillage Res. 2015, 148, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Liu, Y.-J.; Hu, J.-M.; Wang, T.-W.; Cai, C.-F.; Li, Z.-X.; Zhang, Y. Effects of Vegetation Cover and Road-Concentrated Flow on Hillslope Erosion in Rainfall and Scouring Simulation Tests in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China. Catena 2016, 136, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Maiti, S.K. Ecorestoration of the Coalmine Degraded Lands; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2013; ISBN 9788132208501. [Google Scholar]
  202. Yang, L.; Huang, Y.; Lima, L.V.; Sun, Z.; Liu, M.; Wang, J.; Liu, N.; Ren, H. Rethinking the Ecosystem Functions of Dicranopteris, a Widespread Genus of Ferns. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 581513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Hayasaka, D.; Akasaka, M.; Miyauchi, D.; Box, E.O.; Uchida, T. Qualitative Variation in Roadside Weed Vegetation along an Urban–rural Road Gradient. Flora-Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 2012, 207, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Lan, H.X.; Hu, R.L.; Yue, Z.Q.; Lee, C.F.; Wang, S.J. Engineering and Geological Characteristics of Granite Weathering Profiles in South China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2003, 21, 353–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Kimoto, A.; Uchida, T.; Mizuyama, T.; Changhua, L. Influences of Human Activities on Sediment Discharge from Devastated Weathered Granite Hills of Southern China: Effects of 4-Year Elimination of Human Activities. Catena 2002, 48, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Kessler, M.; Kluge, J.; Hemp, A.; Ohlemüller, R. A Global Comparative Analysis of Elevational Species Richness Patterns of Ferns: Global Analysis of Fern Transects. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2011, 20, 868–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Tinsley, M.J.; Simmons, M.T.; Windhager, S. The Establishment Success of Native versus Non-Native Herbaceous Seed Mixes on a Revegetated Roadside in Central Texas. Ecol. Eng. 2006, 26, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Negishi, J.N.; Sidle, R.C.; Noguchi, S.; Nik, A.R.; Stanforth, R. Ecological Roles of Roadside Fern (Dicranopteris Curranii) on Logging Road Recovery in Peninsular Malaysia: Preliminary Results. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 224, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Matesanz, S.; Valladares, F. Improving Revegetation of Gypsum Slopes Is Not a Simple Matter of Adding Native Species: Insights from a Multispecies Experiment. Ecol. Eng. 2007, 30, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Putz, F.E.; Mooney, H.A. The Biology of Vines; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1991; ISBN 9780521392501. [Google Scholar]
  211. Wang, Z.-Q.; Wu, L.-H.; Animesh, S.; Zhu, Y.-H. Phytoremediation of Rocky Slope Surfaces: Selection and Growth of Pioneer Climbing Plants. Pedosphere 2009, 19, 541–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Schnitzer, S.A.; Bongers, F. The Ecology of Lianas and Their Role in Forests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 5, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  213. Zhu, H.; Ruan, D.H.; Qin, S.Y. Vertical Ecological Restoration Technique for the High-Steep Rock Slopes of Highway in Mountainous Area. In Proceedings of the Geosynthetics in Civil and Environmental Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 843–846. [Google Scholar]
  214. Shedbalkar, U.U.; Adki, V.S.; Jadhav, J.P.; Bapat, V.A. Opuntia and Other Cacti: Applications and Biotechnological Insights. Trop. Plant Biol. 2010, 3, 136–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Griffith, M.P. The Origins of an Important Cactus Crop, Opuntia Ficus-Indica (Cactaceae): New Molecular Evidence. Am. J. Bot. 2004, 91, 1915–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  216. Bariagabre, S.A.; Asante, I.K.; Gordon, C.; Ananng, T.Y. Cactus Pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) a Valuable Crop for Restoration of Degraded Soils in Northern Ethiopia. J. Biol. Agric. Healthc. 2016, 6, 11–18. [Google Scholar]
  217. Le Houérou, H.N. Cacti (Opuntia spp.) as a fodder crop for marginal lands in th Mediterranean Basin. Acta Hortic. 2002, 581, 21–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. Overview of engineering solutions to overcome the challenges of steep slope revegetation. (*)Biocementation may be used for structuring the soil and stabilize mine residues in specific environments, such as those rich in iron.
Figure 2. Overview of engineering solutions to overcome the challenges of steep slope revegetation. (*)Biocementation may be used for structuring the soil and stabilize mine residues in specific environments, such as those rich in iron.
Sustainability 14 17003 g002
Figure 3. Functional characteristics of short- and long-lived plant species that overcome environmental constraints imposed by steep slope ecosystems.
Figure 3. Functional characteristics of short- and long-lived plant species that overcome environmental constraints imposed by steep slope ecosystems.
Sustainability 14 17003 g003
Figure 4. Adaptations to revegetation challenges and compliance with revegetation targets of different plant functional groups.
Figure 4. Adaptations to revegetation challenges and compliance with revegetation targets of different plant functional groups.
Sustainability 14 17003 g004
Figure 5. A dense fibrous root system developed within five months of Paspalum cinerascens (Döll) A.G. Burm. and C.N. Bastos (Poaceae) tiller cultivation in shallow mining substrates (under greenhouse conditions). P. cinerascens is a native species from the Carajás cangas, eastern Amazon, and its successful establishment on steep slopes is expected to reduce soil erosion by the formation of a dense root carpet.
Figure 5. A dense fibrous root system developed within five months of Paspalum cinerascens (Döll) A.G. Burm. and C.N. Bastos (Poaceae) tiller cultivation in shallow mining substrates (under greenhouse conditions). P. cinerascens is a native species from the Carajás cangas, eastern Amazon, and its successful establishment on steep slopes is expected to reduce soil erosion by the formation of a dense root carpet.
Sustainability 14 17003 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gastauer, M.; Massante, J.C.; Ramos, S.J.; da Silva, R.d.S.S.; Boanares, D.; Guedes, R.S.; Caldeira, C.F.; Medeiros-Sarmento, P.S.; de Castro, A.F.; Prado, I.G.d.O.; et al. Revegetation on Tropical Steep Slopes after Mining and Infrastructure Projects: Challenges and Solutions. Sustainability 2022, 14, 17003. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142417003

AMA Style

Gastauer M, Massante JC, Ramos SJ, da Silva RdSS, Boanares D, Guedes RS, Caldeira CF, Medeiros-Sarmento PS, de Castro AF, Prado IGdO, et al. Revegetation on Tropical Steep Slopes after Mining and Infrastructure Projects: Challenges and Solutions. Sustainability. 2022; 14(24):17003. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142417003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gastauer, Markus, Jhonny Capichoni Massante, Silvio Junio Ramos, Rayara do Socorro Souza da Silva, Daniela Boanares, Rafael Silva Guedes, Cecílio Frois Caldeira, Priscila Sanjuan Medeiros-Sarmento, Arianne Flexa de Castro, Isabelle Gonçalves de Oliveira Prado, and et al. 2022. "Revegetation on Tropical Steep Slopes after Mining and Infrastructure Projects: Challenges and Solutions" Sustainability 14, no. 24: 17003. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142417003

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop