Next Article in Journal
Practical Synthesis of Phosphinic Dipeptides by Tandem Esterification of Aminophosphinic and Acrylic Acids under Silylating Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Nickel-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks as Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Deeper Insight into the Volatile Profile of Rosa willmottiae with Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction and GC–MS Analysis

1
Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment of the Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
2
CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(4), 1240; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041240
Submission received: 8 December 2021 / Revised: 2 February 2022 / Accepted: 4 February 2022 / Published: 12 February 2022

Abstract

:
As the distribution center of Rosa in the world, China has abundant wild germplasm resources, which can contribute to the breeding of modern roses. To explore the potential value of wild roses distributed in the Sichuan–Tibet region, solid phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) were used to determine the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in Rosa willmottiae flowers at three flowering stages (bud stage, initial flowering stage, full flowering stage). Meanwhile, we compared the VOCs of R. willmottiae with different phenotypes (double flowers and single flowers). A total of 74 volatile compounds were identified. The results show that the essential substances belong to alcohols and terpenoids. The main volatile organic compounds are 2-phenyl ethanol (20.49%), benzyl alcohol (10.69%), β-maaliene (8.66%), geranyl acetate (8.47%), and (+)-α-long pinene (6.127%). Different flowering stages had great influence on the volatile profile, from the bud stage to full flowering stage; the content of terpenoids released decreased by 6.17%, whereas alcohols and esters increased by 8.58% and 11.56%, respectively. The chemical diversity and the content of the main components with a different phenotype were not significantly different. Our result will provide a theoretical basis for the development and utilization of Rosa willmottiae in Sichuan and Tibet.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Fossil finds prove that the Rosa species existed on earth at least 40 million years ago [1]. Rose is a common name given to the thorny shrubs and climbing vines of the genus Rosa in the Rosaceae family, which include about 200 known species of wild roses, mainly distributed in the temperate and subtropical regions of the Northern Hemisphere [2]. Rosa has been known since ancient times for its beautiful flowers and pleasant scent. Today, it is not only famous for its ornamental and aesthetic value in gardens, but also for its applications as an essential oil resource in the perfume, chemical, and cosmetic industries [3,4,5]. Nowadays, there are thousands of cultivated Rosa species through cultivation and propagation techniques [6]. China is the distribution center of Rosa in the world [7], rich in Rosa varieties (approximately 90) which have unique characteristics, and plays an important role in the modern rose cultivation history. Ten of the 15 important parents of modern roses come from China [8,9], which provided favorable conditions for cultivating garden roses [10,11] containing recurrent flowering, high central flower shape, and tea aroma characteristics and other excellent varieties. The first hybrid tea rose in the world, named ‘La France’, has a typical tea flavor which comes from one of the important parents, a Chinese R. odorata (‘Parks’ Yellow Tea-scented China’) [7,12].
Rosa willmottiae belongs to the subgenus Flora of the Rosaceae family, mainly distributed in Sichuan, Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, and Tibet [2] and grows in shrubs at an altitude of 1300–3800 m. The type specimens of R. willmottiae were collected from Songpan County, Sichuan Province. According to records, R. willmottiae is a medicinal plant which can be used to treat feverish vomiting blood, hot polydipsia, epigastric distension, thirst, diarrhea, malaria, bleeding from knife wounds, and irregular menstruation [13]. Similar to other scented roses, R. willmottiae has a pleasant scent. However, its floral composition is rarely reported, only its petal aroma volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is [14], but how the volatile profile of the whole flower changes with the flowering stage is unknown. In addition, double flower mutants of R. willmottiae occur in the wild, but how the floral phenotype under natural mutation affects floral aroma components is also unknown.
Aroma volatile organic compounds are often difficult to measure, collect, and analyze, so they must rely on relevant technologies [7,15]. There are three methods for extracting floral components from plants: traditional water distillation, solvent extraction, and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [16,17]. High temperature in traditional water distillation methods may result in the loss of some components, while solvent extraction methods often affect the determination of the plant VOCs due to residual organic solvents [18,19]. However, SPME can maximally maintain the integrity and authenticity of the flora VOCs [20]. This method is simple, rapid, and effective, with a low detection threshold [21].Therefore, SPME is the best method to extract volatile organic compounds and has been widely used [9,22]. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is currently the most commonly used method for the determination of volatile substances [23].
In order to understand the flora volatile profile of Rosa willmottiae, this study used SPME + GC–MS to determine the main components: (1) to explore the changes of volatile organic compounds at different flowering stages [24]; (2) to analyze the effect of petal number variation on the fragrance composition of R. willmottiae; and (3) to excavate the floral components with economic value, to provide a scientific basis for developing new raw materials of plant essential oil, to cultivate new varieties, and to lay a theoretical foundation for the development and utilization of R. willmottiae in the Sichuan–Tibet region.

2. Results

2.1. Volatile Organic Compounds of Single-Petal Phenotype Rosebuds at Different Stages

A total of 74 volatile compounds were detected by using the SPME + GCMS (Table S1). These compounds belong to 10 categories, including alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, esters, ethers, phenols, terpenes, aliphatic hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, and furans. Richness by category and total content at different flowering stages are shown in Table S2; RW1 to RW3 is composed of 8–10 categories (Figure 1) and the total richness of VOCs is (47 ± 2) species. Terpenes were the most abundant group in all stages (34.94% in RW1, 27.32% in RW2, and 28.77% in RW3), followed by alcohols (26.70% in RW1, 30.20% in RW2, and 35.28% in RW3) (Figure 2). Terpenoids were highest in RW1 and alcohols increased with flower blooming. The contents of aldehydes and aliphatic hydrocarbons decreased gradually with flower blooming. On the contrary, ester content gradually increased with flower blooming (3.3%, 11.15%, and 14.86%, respectively). The contents of others were present at low levels—less than 5% in total.
The contents of the main chemical components of Rosa willmottiae at different flower stages are shown in Figure 3, and changes vary. Geranyl acetate (0%, 6.01%, 8.47%) gradually accumulates with flowers blooming; Although 2-phenylethanol has a similar trend, there is no significant difference between the initial stage and flowering stage (p > 0.05). On the contrary, the contents of β-maaliene (11.43%, 8.32%, 8.66%), (+)-α-longipinene (9.49%, 6.19%, 6.13%), (E)-β-farnesene (6.36%, 5.01%, 4.95%), and benzaldehyde (7.50%, 6.08%, 5.62%) decreased, also with no significant difference between the initial stage and flowering stage. Additionally, pentadecane (6.96%, 5.49%, 1.99%) decreased to an extreme extent with flower blooming. Benzyl alcohol (10.02%, 6.85%, 10.69%) content was the lowest in the initial stage.
There were 30 common components in the third stage of Rosa willmottiae (Figure 4A), including four alcohols (mainly 2-phenyl ethanol and benzyl alcohol), three kinds of aldehydes (mainly benzaldehyde and trans-2-hexenal), two aliphatic hydrocarbons (pentadecane and n-heptadecane), o-methyl benzene as the only common aromatic hydrocarbon, three esters (phenethyl acetate, benzyl acetate, and hexyl formate), one ether (anisole), and one ketone (2-methyl-4-undecanone). There were 15 common terpenes (mainly pinene and β-elemene). The unique components in bud stage were the most prevalent, up to 13 (β-bisabolene; α-muurolene; 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene; methyl isoeugenol; tetradecane; trans-2,4-decadienal; 2-methyl-1-indanone; 1,3-cyclohexadiene, 5-butyl-; nonanal; (E)-2-octenal; (1S)- (1)-beta-pinene; 2-ethylfuran), and methyl isoeugenol (2.45%) had the highest content. The composition of alpha-gurjunene and isocaryophyllene is unique in the initial flowering stage, while 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 alpha-hexahydro-1-isopropyl-4, 7-dimethylnaphthalene, and β-humulene are unique to the full flowering stage. The initial and full flowering stages have common components, up to 85%.

2.2. Variation in Flowering Stage of R. willmottiae with Different Phenotypes

The single and double flower phenotypes of Rosa willmottiae contained roughly the same variety of volatile substances (Table S2). Terpenoids and alcohols were the most abundant. It can be seen from Figure 5 that, compared with RW3, the total contents of terpenoids and aldehydes in RWD increased by 6.31% and 7.32%, respectively, while the contents of alcohols and esters decreased by 3.23% and 6.31%, respectively. The contents of ketones, ethers, aliphatic, and aromatic hydrocarbons were all less than 5%. The alpha diversity analysis in Table 1 shows that the chemical components of the two phenotypic samples did not differ significantly. The Shannon index was 2.856 and 2.896, the Simpson index was 0.905 and 0.912, and the Pielou evenness index was 0.737 and 0.740, respectively.
There were 39 common components of the two phenotypic samples, accounting for more than 90% of the total components (Figure 4B; Table S1). Furthermore, phenethyl alcohol and benzyl alcohol were the main components, and there was little difference in the content. However, geranyl acetate was significantly higher in RW3 than RWD.

2.3. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

PCA analysis (Figure 6) of nine kinds volatiles at different stages and phenotypes in Rosa willmottiae could explain 88.81% of the total variation, with the ranking characteristics of the PC1 and PC2 first two restricted axes accounting for 69.3% and 19.5%. There was no overlap in principal component score plots for different stages and phenotypes, indicating difference in their volatile organic compounds and relative content compounds. Esters, alcohols, ethers, phenols, furans, and ketones had higher scores in PC1, which may help to distinguish the different blooming stage. The initial and blooming stage was positively correlated with alcohols and esters, and the bud stage was positively correlated with furans, phenols, ketones, ethers, and aliphatic hydrocarbons. The content of aromatic hydrocarbons, terpenes, fatty acids, and aldehydes was highest in PC2, which distinguished the different phenotypes. Among them, the double phenotype was positively correlated with terpenes and aldehydes.

3. Discussion

3.1. The Main Volatile Organic Compounds of Rosa willmottiae and Their Variation in Flowering Stages

The flora’s volatile profile varies in different plants and in different stages [25]; the difference not only depends on the plant’s physiological level, but is also concerned with their growth and reproduction strategies [26]. Most plants release volatiles gradually and generate aroma from the bud stage in order to obtain utmost pollination opportunities and reach the peak when the flowers fully open [25,27,28]. R. willmottiae has strong aroma in full bloom stage, with the accumulation of typical aroma components (benzyl alcohol, phenyl ethanol, ethyl acetate, etc.) in flowers, which is consistent with the pollination biological characteristics of the plant. The same phenomenon also existed in other plants [21,29,30,31,32]. Regulated by flower development, changes in plant growth hormone secretion, gene expression, and enzyme synthesis with time and environment at different flowering stages lead to variation in different metabolic pathways of composition, ultimately affecting the anabolism and release of volatile composition [33,34]. Ethylene can inhibit or promote the flower opening of rose species [35,36].The volatile organic compounds of R. willmottiae in bud stage were significantly different from those in initial and full flowering stages, which may be related to ethylene regulation. The specificity of enzymes showed that NADP/NAD involved in the mutual transformation of volatile alcohols’ and aldehydes’ [6] expression of OMT affects the production of 1, 3, and 5-trihydroxybenzene (a typical tea-scent aroma in Chinese tea rose) [17]. Therefore, we believe that the changes in the main components’ content of R. willmottiae are related to the level of some enzymes and genes, which can be further explored in the future.
Plant floral fragrances are characterized by high diversity; even if the flower type and color are similar, the flower fragrance is not exactly the same [37,38]. Some scent substances contribute to the unique fragrance of a plant; for example, 3,5-dimethoxybenzene and 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (phenolic, spicy, earthy, and animalic notes) endow the tea-scent perfume to the Chinese rose [9]. At present, more than 2000 fragrance substances have been identified [39], among which terpenoids are the largest class of substances [40]. In this study, apart from terpenes, R. willmottiae also has a high content of alcohols, with a total content of 58.15–66.16% (Figure 2; Table S2). Among them, the content of phenylethanol (sweet and rosy fragrance) is the highest in all stages and reaches its peak in full flowering stage. Additionally, benzyl alcohol (aromatic, floral, fruity), geraniol (rosy), β-maaliene (woody), (+)-α-long pinene (floral, rosy, fruity, raspberry), and acetic acid ethyl (fruity, rosy) constitute the main components of Rosa willmottiae and make the aroma strongest.

3.2. Heterogeneity of Volatile Organic Compounds in Different Phenotypes’ Flowers of Rosa willmottiae

In nature, the origin of double flowers mainly includes the accumulation, bracts, androgynies, stage, repeated, and inflorescence origins [41]. The study of hybrid rose petals confirmed that the double petals originated from stamen penalization [42]. The research on its formation mechanism mainly focuses on the ABCE model and proposes that the formation of the double flowers is caused by abnormal regulation of the ABCE gene during flower development [20,42,43], but the developmental model is incomplete. Factors such as leaf [44], temperature [45,46], and hormone [47] can directly/indirectly activate/inhibit the expression of genes related to floral organ formation, and thus regulate the formation and development of floral organs [41]. The ecological adaptations of plants and animals are usually observed in phenotypic traits and can be expressed by producing different biochemical substances [48]. There are few reports on double flowers from the chemical perspective. We assume that the polyphyll of wild rose flower influenced the VOCs. However, the heterogeneity analysis of volatile organic compounds showed that there was no significant difference in the total amount and main components of volatile organic compounds between the single petal phenotype and double petal phenotype; moreover, the chemical components’ diversity was basically the same. Therefore, the double flowers did not increase the content of volatile substances significantly, which was consistent with the study of Rosa chinensis [9]. They believed that double petals had a slower opening and release process than single petals, thus leading to the similarity. On the contrary, double-flower Narcissus tazetta released twice as many volatiles as single-flower Narcissus tazetta [49]. In summary, the relations between the petal duplication and flower volatiles should be taken into consideration. Although the double penalization of petals had no significant effect on the main volatile organic compounds content in R. willmottiae, further research can study this in depth through combination with biogeography, genetics, morphology, cytology, and other molecular mechanisms.

3.3. Potential Development Value of Floral Flavor Components in Rosa willmottiae

Rosa is an excellent horticultural plant in respect to its flower traits or fragrance and also its use as cut flowers. However, garden varieties lose fragrance due to breeders’ excessive focus on the flower shape rather than fragrance [6,50]. Fragrance is a sensory pleasure, one which can directly affect the part of the cerebrum that is in charge of memory and emotions, help people adjust psychologically, relieve tension, and benefit their immune regulation [51]. Therefore, R. willmottiae shows potential value for its bright, colorful petal and typical rose flavor. Apart from horticultural applications, it is well known that the Rosa oil possesses important economic value [52,53]. Essential oils are applied widely in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and food industries on account of their antibacterial, anticancer, neuroprotective, psychophysiological, and anti-aging activities [54], and Rosa oil is the most attractive, although it has low oil yield [7]. On account of the pleasant scent of R. willmottiae, we can attempt to explore its essential oil value as a raw material.
The results showed that 2-phenylethanol was the main component of R. willmottiae. Existing widely in the floral components of plants [55], 2-phenylethanol (2-PE) is an aromatic alcohol with a classical rose aroma [56,57]. It has been widely used as an aromatic alcohol in the food, pharmaceutical, and daily chemicals industries [58]. For example, in the food industry, it is used as an edible additive for blending the flavor of strawberry, caramel, honey, cream, etc. Its dosage has a clear national standard (GB 2760–2014) in China. In addition to traditional uses, its low volatility, high energy density, and non-hygroscopic properties have attracted interest in developing it as a potential biofuel molecule or a fuel additive [59]. Besides, 2-PE has good antibacterial properties [60], and researchers have confirmed through mouse experiments that phenylethanol has sedative effects [61]. Therefore, R. willmottiae can be used as a potential species resource to obtain natural phenylethanol.
With the exception of flower scent characteristics, R. willmottiae can grow well in southwest mountainous areas of China [2,62]. Therefore, R. willmottiae has the potential to provide a good hybrid source for cash crops of mountainous areas, and is of great significance to promote the economic development of southwest China.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

The R. willmottiae samples were collected from Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture, Songpan County, Sichuan Province in June 2020. The specimens were identified by Xinfen Gao, a senior researcher of the Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and preserved in the Herbarium of Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. In this study, flowers were divided into three stages [9,24] according to the degree of blooming: bud stage (RW1), the initial flowering stage (RW2), and full flowering stage, including the single flower phenotype (RW3) and double flower phenotype (RWD). The collected fresh flowers were wrapped in aluminum foil and immediately placed in liquid nitrogen. They were transported back to the laboratory and stored in −80 °C refrigerator as soon as possible.

4.2. Extraction and Analysis

In this study, SPME was used to extract VOCs from the samples we referred to [9], with minor modifications. Before extraction, the samples were ground into a fine powder with liquid nitrogen. Then, a 1.5–2 g sample powder was transferred to a 20 mL headspace and kept in a constant temperature water bath for balance at 50 °C for 20 min, then the extraction head (50/30 μm DVB/CAR/PDMS) was inserted and extraction conducted for 40 min. The solid-phase micro-extraction head was then inserted into the gas chromatographic inlet, and analysis was conducted at 270 °C for 2 min. Each stage had three replicates.
A GCMS-QP2010 system (Shimadzu, Japan) was used for compound identification. The GC–MS analysis conditions were as follows: The chromatographic column was a DB-5 quartz capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm), the detector was a hydrogen flame ionization detector, high purity helium gas (99.999%) was used as a carrier gas with the gas velocity of 1.0 mL/min, and the split ratio was 3. The column temperature was held at 40 °C for 5 min, increased by 5 °C min−1 to 150 °C, increased by 10 °C min−1 to 280 °C, and held for 2 min. The MS was operated using an EI source with electron energy of 70 eV. Mass spectrometry used full scan mode with m/z ranging from 35 to 600. Linear retention indices (LRI) of the compounds were calculated using a linear alkane mixture (C7–C40) under the same conditions. After obtaining the ion flow diagram of volatile organic compounds, the qualitative analysis of the compounds was determined by matching MS with the NIST library, the retention time and retention index were compared with plant databases Pherobase (27 May 2021, www.pherobase.com), Flavornet (27 May 2021, www.flavornet.org/flavornet.html), NISTChemistry WebBook (27 May 2021, webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/), and literature reports [9,63,64].

4.3. Data Processing and Analysis

The relative content of VOCs was calculated by the peak area normalization method, which was expressed as the ratio of peak area to the total. Excel and R were used for all statistical analyses. Excel was used only for data sorting and statistics. Volatile values were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The R version was 4.1.2. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s test was used to assess volatile difference analysis. Different letters (a–c) in Tables S1 and S2 represent significant differences between samples (p ≤ 0.05). A Venn diagram was generated to visualize the shared and unique numbers of common and unique substances at different stages using R package “VennDiagram”. The alpha diversity index was calculated using R package “vegan”. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed using the R packages “FactoMineR” and “factoextra”. All the visualization figures were implemented by R package “ggplot2”.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the VOCs profile of R. willmottiae in the wild was analyzed by SPME + GCMS. All the compounds can be divided into 10 categories, among which alcohols and terpenoids are most important. The flowering stages can be distinguished by the total content of substances. The contents of alcohols and esters are higher in the early and full flowering stages, whereas the contents of terpenoids are highest in the bud stages. Although the chemical diversity of double-flowers was not significantly different from that of single-flower, the cause of polyphyll type could be further explored in combination with other factors such as climate factors. Our result will provide a theoretical basis for the development and utilization of Rosa willmottiae. At the same time, it will open up new ideas for the economic development of Sichuan and Tibet.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1: Rosa willmottiae in the wild.; Table S1: The composition of VOCs (volatile organic compounds) in Rosa willmottiae at different stages and different flower phenotypes; Table S2: The richness and total content of VOCs classified by different categories in Rosa willmottiae.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.J.; Funding acquisition, X.G.; Investigation, R.J.; Methodology, R.J.; Project administration, X.G.; Resources, X.G.; Supervision, R.J., X.G. and P.G.; Writing—original draft, R.J.; Writing—review and editing, R.J. and P.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research program (Grant No. 2019QZKK05020107) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31670192).

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to the Analysis and Testing Center of Sichuan University, Sichuan, China, for providing the GC–MS used for experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baser, K.H.C.; Altintaş, A.; Kurkcuoglu, M. Turkish rose. A review of the history, ethnobotany, and modern uses of rose petals, rose oil, rose water, and other rose products. Herbalgram 2013, 96, 40–53. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ku, T.C. Spongberg SA Malus Miller. In Flora of China, Vol. 9: 339–381; Wu, Z.Y., Raven, P.H., Hong, D.Y., Eds.; Science Press/Missouri Botanical Garden Press: Beijing, China; St. Louis, MO, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  3. Younis, A.; Khan, M.A.; Ali, A.; Pervaiz, M.A. Performance of Four Rosa Species Under Faisalabad Agroclimatic Conditions. Caderno de Pesquisa série Biologia 2006, 18, 17–27. [Google Scholar]
  4. Thallaj, N.; Labban, L. The medicinal and pharmacological properties of damascene rose (Rosa damascena): A review. Int. J. Herb. Med. 2020, 8, 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gudin, S. Rose: Genetics and Breeding. Plant Breed. Rev. 2010, 17, 159–189. [Google Scholar]
  6. Magnard, J.L.; Roccia, A.; Caissard, J.C.; Vergne, P.; Sun, P.; Hecquet, R.; Dubois, A.; Hibrand-Saint Oyant, L.; Jullien, F.; Nicole, F.; et al. Biosynthesis of monoterpene scent compounds in roses. Science 2015, 349, 81–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Zhou, L.; Yu, C.; Cheng, B.; Wan, H.; Luo, L.; Pan, H.; Zhang, Q. Volatile compound analysis and aroma evaluation of tea-scented roses in China. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 155, 112735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tze-Ming, L. Rose of China and roses of Europe. Acta Hortic. Sin. 1964, 3, 387–394. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhou, L.; Yu, C.; Cheng, B.; Han, Y.; Luo, L.; Pan, H.; Zhang, Q. Studies on the volatile compounds in flower extracts of Rosa odorata and R. chinensis. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 146, 112143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ueda, Y.; Wang, N.; Sasaki, H.; Watanabe, N.; Yomogida, K. Volatile Components in Chinese Roses. Acta Hortic. 2007, 751, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ye, L. Study on the main aroma components of ancient Chinese rose type. Modern Hortic. 2017, 2, 1. [Google Scholar]
  12. Guoliang, W. Old Roses in China. Am. Rose 2016, 43, 58–62. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ye, H. Medicinal Plants in China; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, Z. Analysis of Volatile Components and Expression of Floral Scent Synthase Gene RhNUDX1 in Rosa L.; Yunnan University: Kunming, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  15. Adler, L.S.I.; Rebecca, E. What you smell is more important than what you see? Natural selection on floral scent. New Phytol. 2012, 195, 510–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Venskutonis, P.R. Effect of drying on the volatile constituents of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L) and sage (Salvia officinalis L). Food Chem. 1997, 59, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Scalliet, G.; Piola, F.; Douady, C.J.; Rety, S.; Raymond, O.; Baudino, S.; Bordji, K.; Bendahmane, M.; Dumas, C.; Cock, J.M.; et al. Scent evolution in Chinese roses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 5927–5932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Kong, Y.; Sun, M.; Pan, H.T.; Zhang, Q.X. Comparison of Different Headspace Gas Sampling Methods for the Analysis of Floral Scent from Lilium ‘Siberia’. Asian J. Chem. 2012, 24, 5175–5178. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kong, Y.; Sun, M.; Pan, H.-t.; Zhang, Q.-x. Composition and Emission Rhythm of Floral Scent Volatiles from Eight Lily Cut Flowers. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2012, 137, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kim, N.S.; Lee, D.S. Comparison of different extraction methods for the analysis of fragrances from Lavandula species by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 982, 31–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, L.-m.; Li, M.-t.; Jin, W.-w.; Li, S.; Zhang, S.-q.; Yu, L.-j. Variations in the components of Osmanthus fragrans Lour. essential oil at different stages of flowering. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 233–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lubes, G.; Goodarzi, M. Analysis of Volatile Compounds by Advanced Analytical Techniques and Multivariate Chemometrics. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 6399–6422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ozel, M.Z.; Gogus, F.; Lewis, A.C. Comparison of direct thermal desorption with water distillation and superheated water extraction for the analysis of volatile components of Rosa damascena Mill. using GCxGC-TOF/MS. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 566, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yu, C. Construction of a Genetic Linkage Map and QTLs Analysis for Phenotypic Traits in Tetraploid Roses. Ph.D. Thesis, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fan, Z.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Yin, H. Composition analysis of floral scent within genus Camellia uncovers substantial interspecific variations. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 250, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pichersky, E.; Noel, J.P.; Dudareva, N. Biosynthesis of Plant Volatiles: Nature’s Diversity and Ingenuity. Science 2006, 311, 808–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. McTavish, H.S.; Davies, N.W.; Menary, R.C. Emission of Volatiles from Brown Boronia Flowers: Some Comparative Observations. Ann. Bot. 2000, 86, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Dudareva, N.; Pichersky, E. Biochemical and molecular genetic aspects of floral scents. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 627–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Al-Kateb, H.; Mottram, D.S. The relationship between growth stages and aroma composition of lemon basil Ocimum citriodorum Vis. Food Chem. 2014, 152, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Li, Y.; Ma, H.; Wan, Y.; Li, T.; Liu, X.; Sun, Z.; Li, Z. Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Luculia pinceana Flower and Its Changes at Different Stages of Flower Development. Molecules 2016, 21, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Burdon, R.C.; Raguso, R.A.; Kessler, A.; Parachnowitsch, A.L. Spatiotemporal Floral Scent Variation of Penstemon digitalis. J. Chem. Ecol. 2015, 41, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fan, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, D.; Wang, G.; Cao, F. Flowering Stage and Daytime Affect Scent Emission of Malus ioensis “Prairie Rose”. Molecules 2019, 24, 2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Dudareva, N.; Pichersky, E.; Gershenzon, J. Biochemistry of plant volatiles. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 1893–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Van Doorn, W.G.; Kamdee, C. Flower opening and closure: An update. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 5749–5757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Reid, M.S.; Dodge, L.L.; Mor, Y.; Evans, R.Y. Effects of Ethylene on Rose opening. Acta Hortic. 1989, 261, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Macnish, A.J.; Simons, D.H.; Joyce, D.C.; Faragher, J.D.; Hofman, P.J. Responses of Native Australian Cut Flowers to Treatment with 1-Methylcyclopropene and Ethylene. HortScience 2000, 35, 254–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Pichersky, E.; Raguso, R.A.; Lewinsohn, E.; Croteau, R. Floral Scent Production in CIarkia (Onagraceae). Plant Physiol. 1994, 106, 1533–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Deng, B.; Cao, Y.; Fang, S.; Shang, X.; Yang, W.; Qian, C. Variation and stability of growth and leaf flavonoid content in Cyclocarya paliurus across environments. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 76, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Knudsen, J.T.; Eriksson, R.; Gershenzon, J.; Stahl, B. Diversity and distribution of floral scent. Bot. Rev. 2006, 72, 1–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hu, Z.; Tang, B.; Wu, Q.; Zheng, J.; Leng, P.; Zhang, K. Transcriptome Sequencing Analysis Reveals a Difference in Monoterpene Biosynthesis between Scented Lilium ‘Siberia’ and Unscented Lilium ‘Novano’. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhao, Y.Q.L.; Liu, Q. Research Advances in the Formation Mechanism and Genetic Characters of Double Flowers. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2009, 29, 832–841. [Google Scholar]
  42. Dubois, A.; Raymond, O.; Maene, M.; Baudino, S.; Langlade, N.B.; Boltz, V.; Vergne, P.; Bendahmane, M. Tinkering with the C-function: A molecular frame for the selection of double flowers in cultivated roses. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Theien, G. Development of floral organ identity: Stories from the MADS house. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tooke, F.; Battey, N.H. A leaf-derived signal is a quantitative determinant of floral form in Impatiens. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1837–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Baër, K.Y.O. An investigation into the cause of sterility in double-flowered freesia varieties and the possibility of restoring fertility. Euphytica 1971, 20, 493–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fan, T.; Zhang, G.; Tian, Y.; Li, Y. Morphological observation of excessive petal Rosa hybrida induced by low temperature. J. Northeast For. Univ. 2014, 9, 116–121. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wen-liang, L.U.; Shu-Nong, B.A.I.; Xian-Sheng, Z. Induction of Continuous Tepal Differentiation from in Vitro Regenerated Flower Buds of Hyacinthus orientalis. Acta Bot. Sin. 1999, 41, 921–926. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hirata, H.; Ohnishi, T.; Tomida, K.; Ishida, H.; Kanda, M.; Sakai, M.; Yoshimura, J.; Suzuki, H.; Ishikawa, T.; Dohra, H.; et al. Seasonal induction of alternative principal pathway for rose flower scent. Sci Rep. 2016, 6, 20234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Ruíz-Ramón, F.; Águila, D.J.; Egea-Cortines, M.; Weiss, J. Optimization of fragrance extraction: Daytime and flower age affect scent emission in simple and double narcissi. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 52, 671–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vainstein, A.; Lewinsohn, E.; Pichersky, E.; Weiss, D. Floral Fragrance. New Inroads into an Old Commodity. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127, 1383–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Harman, L. The human relationship with fragrance. In The Chemistry of Fragrances: From Perfumer to Consumer (2); Sell, C.S., Ed.; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2006; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  52. Baydar, H.; Göktürk, N. The effects of harvest date, fermentation duration and Tween 20 treatment on essential oil content and composition of industrial oil rose (Rosa damascena Mill.). Ind. Crops Prod. 2005, 21, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kováts, E.S. Composition of essential oils. Part 7. Bulgarian oil of rose (Rosa Damascena mill.). J. Chromatogr. A 1987, 406, 185–222. [Google Scholar]
  54. Won, M.-M.; Cha, E.-J.; Yoon, O.-K.; Kim, N.-S.; Kim, K.; Lee, D.-S. Use of headspace mulberry paper bag micro solid phase extraction for characterization of volatile aromas of essential oils from Bulgarian rose and Provence lavender. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 631, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tieman, D.; Taylor, M.; Schauer, N.; Fernie, A.R.; Hanson, A.D.; Klee, H.J. Tomato aromatic amino acid decarboxylases participate in synthesis of the flavor volatiles 2-phenylethanol and 2-phenylacetaldehyde. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 8287–8292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Chen, X.M.; Kobayashi, H.; Sakai, M.; Hirata, H.; Asai, T.; Ohnishi, T.; Baldermann, S.; Watanabe, N. Functional characterization of rose phenylacetaldehyde reductase (PAR), an enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of the scent compound 2-phenylethanol. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Hua, D.; Xu, P. Recent advances in biotechnological production of 2-phenylethanol. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 654–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Machas, M.S.; McKenna, R.; Nielsen, D.R. Expanding Upon Styrene Biosynthesis to Engineer a Novel Route to 2-Phenylethanol. Biotechnol. J. 2017, 12, 1700310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Atsumi, S.; Hanai, T.; Liao, J.C. Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels. Nature 2008, 451, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fraud, S.; Rees, E.L.; Mahenthiralingam, E.; Russell, A.D.; Maillard, J.Y. Aromatic alcohols and their effect on Gram-negative bacteria, cocci and mycobacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 51, 1435–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Medeiros, K.; Dos Santos, J.R.; Melo, T.C.S.; de Souza, M.F.; Santos, L.G.; de Gois, A.M.; Cintra, R.R.; Lins, L.; Ribeiro, A.M.; Marchioro, M. Depressant effect of geraniol on the central nervous system of rats: Behavior and ECoG power spectra. Biomed. J. 2018, 41, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. ZhengYi, W. Flora of Tibet; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  63. Sparkman, O.D. Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/quadrupole mass spectroscopy Robert P. Adams. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 16, 1902–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Moetamedipoor, S.A.; Saharkhiz, M.J.; Khosravi, A.R.; Jowkar, A. Essential oil chemical diversity of Iranian mints. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 172, 114039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The substances’ richness of different kinds in Rosa willmottiae (RW1: bud stage, RW2: initial flowering stage, RW3: full flowering stage of single-flower phenotype).
Figure 1. The substances’ richness of different kinds in Rosa willmottiae (RW1: bud stage, RW2: initial flowering stage, RW3: full flowering stage of single-flower phenotype).
Molecules 27 01240 g001
Figure 2. Ten kinds of VOCs’ accumulation in Rosa willmottiae at different stages.
Figure 2. Ten kinds of VOCs’ accumulation in Rosa willmottiae at different stages.
Molecules 27 01240 g002
Figure 3. The relative content of main VOCs (>5%) in Rosa willmottiae at different stages.
Figure 3. The relative content of main VOCs (>5%) in Rosa willmottiae at different stages.
Molecules 27 01240 g003
Figure 4. The number of substances in Rosa willmottiae. Venn diagrams (A) showing the numbers of common and unique substances at different stages. Venn diagrams (B) showing the numbers of common and unique substances at different flower phenotype.
Figure 4. The number of substances in Rosa willmottiae. Venn diagrams (A) showing the numbers of common and unique substances at different stages. Venn diagrams (B) showing the numbers of common and unique substances at different flower phenotype.
Molecules 27 01240 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of different chemical classes’ content in single-flower phenotype and double-flower phenotype at full opening stage (AroH: aromatic hydrocarbons; AH: aliphatic hydrocarbons).
Figure 5. Comparison of different chemical classes’ content in single-flower phenotype and double-flower phenotype at full opening stage (AroH: aromatic hydrocarbons; AH: aliphatic hydrocarbons).
Molecules 27 01240 g005
Figure 6. Principal component analysis (PCA) of Rosa willmottiae according to groups’ volatile compounds. (A): Score plot of Rosa willmottiae. (B): Biplot based on first and second components. (C,D): Percentages in brackets correspond to the explained variances of corresponding components or axes.
Figure 6. Principal component analysis (PCA) of Rosa willmottiae according to groups’ volatile compounds. (A): Score plot of Rosa willmottiae. (B): Biplot based on first and second components. (C,D): Percentages in brackets correspond to the explained variances of corresponding components or axes.
Molecules 27 01240 g006
Table 1. α-diversity of VOCs (volatile organic compounds) of Rosa willmottiae at different flower phenotype.
Table 1. α-diversity of VOCs (volatile organic compounds) of Rosa willmottiae at different flower phenotype.
PhenotypeAlpha Diversity Index
Shannon-WienerSimpsonPielou
RW3 (single)2.8560.9050.738
RWD (double)2.8960.9120.740
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiao, R.; Gao, P.; Gao, X. Deeper Insight into the Volatile Profile of Rosa willmottiae with Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction and GC–MS Analysis. Molecules 2022, 27, 1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041240

AMA Style

Jiao R, Gao P, Gao X. Deeper Insight into the Volatile Profile of Rosa willmottiae with Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction and GC–MS Analysis. Molecules. 2022; 27(4):1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041240

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiao, Ruifang, Ping Gao, and Xinfen Gao. 2022. "Deeper Insight into the Volatile Profile of Rosa willmottiae with Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction and GC–MS Analysis" Molecules 27, no. 4: 1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041240

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop