Skip the header
Open access
Datasheet
Enhanced
11 November 2016

Elaeagnus umbellata (autumn olive)

Datasheet Types: Crop, Tree, Invasive species, Host plant

Abstract

This datasheet on Elaeagnus umbellata covers Identity, Overview, Distribution, Dispersal, Hosts/Species Affected, Diagnosis, Biology & Ecology, Environmental Requirements, Natural Enemies, Impacts, Uses, Prevention/Control, Management, Further Information.

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name
Elaeagnus umbellata Thunb.
Preferred Common Name
autumn olive
Other Scientific Names
Elaeagnus crispa Thunb.
Elaeagnus crispa var. praematura Koidz.
Elaeagnus longipes var. crispa (Thunb.) K.
Elaeagnus padifolia K.Koch
Elaeagnus parvifolia Wall. ex Royle
Elaeagnus umbellata var. nakaiana Araki
Elaeagnus umbellata var. parvifolia (Wall. ex Royle) C. K. Schneid.
International Common Names
English
autumn berry
autumn elaeagnus
oleaster
spreading oleaster
Spanish
fresa de otoño
fresa japonesa
fresa plateada
French
oléastre réfléchi
Chinese
niu naizi
qiu hu tui zi
Local Common Names
Dominican Republic
fresa japonesa
fresa plateada
Germany
Ölweide, Doldige
Japan
aki-gumi
USA
autumnberry
EPPO code
ELGUM (Elaeagnus umbellata)

Pictures

Natural habit of E. umbellata growing on coastal sand dunes, around 1.5 m tall. Tottori, Japan.
Habit
Natural habit of E. umbellata growing on coastal sand dunes, around 1.5 m tall. Tottori, Japan.
Norikazu Yamanaka
Fruit and foliage of E. umbellata. Tottori, Japan.
Fruit and foliage
Fruit and foliage of E. umbellata. Tottori, Japan.
Norikazu Yamanaka

Overview

Importance

E. umbellata is an important deciduous shrub which reaches up to 5 m high and 10 cm in d.b.h. It is found in thickets and sparse woods of Japan, Korea and China. E. umbellata is a shade intolerant pioneer tree and is also commonly found along riversides and seashores in Japan. This species is growing in humid areas with 1000-4000 mm of annual rainfall in Japan. In China it is reported to grow even in semi-arid areas of Nei Menggu, Gansu and Shaanxi province, where annual rainfall is around 400 mm (Niu, 1990). E. umbellata can fix nitrogen and it is tolerant to salt winds, this species is therefore used for fixation of coastal sand dunes in Japan, and is frequently planted mixed with Pinus thunbergii as a soil improving tree. E. umbellata is also planted in eroded areas of mountainous zones to re-establish and develop vegetation. In China, E. umbellata is occasionally cultivated in gardens (Zhang, 1997).The wood is not valuable. The fruits are edible and used locally as medicinal products to treat asthma. The seeds are sometimes used to treat diarrhoea (Uehara, 1977).

Summary of Invasiveness

E. umbellata is a deciduous shrub which has been introduced from its native Asia to Europe and North America for revegetation, wildlife cover and environmental benefits, but in many areas it has escaped and become naturalised and invasive especially in disturbed sites and areas near cultivation. Due to its high seed production and high germination rates, this species has the potential to rapidly colonize new areas. Additionally, it is a hardy, nitrogen-fixing species that resprouts quickly after burning or cutting. This species has become particularly invasive in central and northeastern states of the USA and it is beginning to spread across Europe. Currently, E. umbellata is considered one of the most troublesome invasive plants in central and eastern USA (USDA-NRCS, 2016). It is related to other invasive species Elaeagnus angustifolia and Elaeagnus pungens, the former being a serious weed in western North America.

Taxonomic Tree

This content is currently unavailable.

Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature

Elaeagnaceae is a small family of flowering plants including just 3 genera (Elaeagnus,Hippophae and Shepherdia) and about 45 species of thorny and mostly deciduous shrubs and trees native to temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere, Malesia and Australia (Zheng et al., 2006; Stevens, 2012). All genera are associated with nitrogen-fixing actinomycetes of the genus Frankia in their roots (Stevens, 2012).

Plant Type

Perennial
Broadleaved
Seed propagated
Tree
Shrub
Woody

Description

E. umbellata is a deciduous shrub 2-4 (-5) m tall and 10 cm in diameter with slender, spreading branches, more or less spiny with thorns about 2.5 cm long. The bark is removable in longitudinal strips exposing the white hardwood underneath. An important distinguishing characteristic is that shoots and young branches are clothed with very attractive white silvery scales (lepidote), but which disappear with the rains. Leaves in clusters, elliptic to ovate-oblong, 4-8 cm long and 1-2 (-2.5) cm wide, upper surface sparsely white and covered with small scaly leaves (lepidote), lower surface densely white lepidote, apex acute to sometimes obtuse, petioles 0.5-1 cm long, densely white lepidote. Fragrant flowers appear in bunches of 1-7 in axillary umbels, white to light yellow, 8-9 mm long and 7 mm in diameter, perianth densely scaled, four-lobed; androecium comprising 4 stamens, very small, attached to the mouth of the corolla tube; gynoecium, simple, with one pistil, its average length being 7 mm, pedicels 3-6 (-8) mm long, elongating up to 12 mm long in fruit; hypanthium slender, gradually narrowed at base, 5-7 mm long; calyx lobes narrowly ovate, ca 3-5 mm long. Fruits, ovoid to globose, 3-9 mm long and 5 mm broad; epicarp, thin, covering the whole fruit; mesocarp, pulpy and juicy; pedicel, 5-6 mm long; freshly picked fruits, coral pink, seeds, 7-8 mm long and 2-3 mm in diameter, saffron yellow and approximately 26 mg in weight. Adapted from PIER (2008) and Parmar and Kaushal (1982).

Distribution

E. umbellata is native to tropical and temperate Asia, from Afghanistan to Japan, traversing northern India and northern China. It is sympatric with other Elaeagnus species such as E. angustifolia, but tends to occupy different habitats. It has been introduced in North America, Europe, and Australia (USDA-ARS, 2016). 

Distribution Map

This content is currently unavailable.

Distribution Table

This content is currently unavailable.

History of Introduction and Spread

E. umbellata was introduced intentionally to temperate regions in Europe and North America. It was first introduced to the UK in 1829 (Bean, 1973). It was introduced into the USA in 1830 from China and Japan (Sather and Eckardt, 2001). It has been actively promoted by state and federal agencies for shelter belts, erosion control, strip mine reclamation, wildlife habitat, and was widely marketed as an ornamental. The shrub has now become a noxious weed and invasive species in many states from the east coast to the central prairies. This species is also spreading across Europe.  Currently it is listed as invasive in France, Italy, Belgium and the Azores (Christenhusz and Uffelen, 2001). It does not appear to be invasive in the UK, where it was not recorded in the wild until nearly 150 years after introduction, and did not naturally regenerate in trials where it was used as a nurse plant for walnut (Clark et al., 2008). In Costa Rica it can be found naturalized and spreading in disturbed sites, thickets, and along roadsides (Christenhusz, 2009). 

Risk of Introduction

The risk of new introductions of E. umbellata is very high. This species is listed as invasive in the USA (USDA-NRCS, 2008) and Europe (DAISIE, 2016) and it also received a high score in a weed risk assessment for the Pacific (PIER, 2008). It could become an invasive weed in other temperate areas where it is not yet present, such as parts of Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and South America. Further introductions in Europe should also be monitored, as well as habitats at risk where already present.

Means of Movement and Dispersal

Vector Transmission (Biotic)

Seeds are spread widely by birds (PIER, 2008), and to a lesser extent by small mammals (Munger, 2003). Munger (2003) also list species known to eat E. umbellata in the USA, including many birds (grey catbirds, hermit thrushes, wood thrushes, house finches, American robins, cardinals, cedar waxwings, common grackles, evening grosbeaks, fox sparrows, house sparrows, song sparrows, white-throated sparrows, mockingbirds, myrtle warblers, purple finches, rufus-sided towhees, starlings, tree swallows, veerys, northern bobwhite, ruffed grouse, mourning doves, ring-necked pheasants, wild turkeys and mallards), raccoons, skunks, opossums, and black bears, and it is also browsed by white-tailed deer.

Intentional Introduction

Long distance dispersal of E. umbellata has been due entirely to its intentional introduction for perceived environmental benefits.

Pathway Causes

Pathway Vectors

Hosts/Species Affected

E. umbellata is known to invade pine plantations in the USA.

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

HostFamilyHost statusReferences
Pinus (pines)PinaceaeUnknown 

Similarities to Other Species/Conditions

E. umbellata is closely related to another Asiatic native, E. angustifolia, which is also invasive in the USA. E. angustifolia leaves remain silvery until the leaves are shed in autumn, while in E. umbellata the silvery scales which cover young leaves in spring wear off during the summer so that the leaves turn greener.

Habitat

In its native range, E. umbellata can be found in thickets, sparse woods, forest edges, hillside wastelands, riversides and seashores in subtropical and temperate regions of Japan, Korea and China at elevations of 20 to 3000 m. It is common in humid temperate areas with 1000-4000 mm annual rainfall in Japan, but it can grow even in semi-arid areas of Nei Menggu, Gansu and Shaanxi, China, where annual rainfall is around 400 mm.
Outside its native range, it can be found naturalized in disturbed sites, thickets, along roads and also planted in gardens and parks (Christenhusz, 2009; USDA-NRCS, 2016). In North America, typical habitats include disturbed areas, roadsides, pastures and fields and it invades grasslands and sparse woodlands, pine plantations, ravines, grazed upland oak forest, and the edge of hill prairies in Illinois and central USA (Ebinger and Lehnen, 1981; Owens and Cole, 2003). In New England, USA, it is found on abandoned fields, abandoned gravel pits, early-successional forest, pasture, planted forest, railways, roadsides, paths, urban areas, and is probably most prolific on disturbed or ruderal sites (Munger, 2003). In southern Ontario, Canada, it is found in dry to mesic sandy, forested and open to sparsely shaded habitats, though is most invasive in areas of dry sandy soils and is generally not invasive on fine-textured, periodically wet soils (Catling et al., 1997). Its shade tolerance is disputed, being reported various as shade intolerant or tolerant, though it appears that it has at least some ability to establish under a forest canopy but is not well-adapted to low light conditions as it is generally absent from dense forest and restricted to open-canopy areas (Munger, 2003). PIER (2008) noted it as dominating in almost any landscape type, from fencerows to meadows to open woods, even sand dunes and mine spoils. Munger (2003) noted special risks for natural communities of sandy, infertile habitats throughout the Great Lakes region.

Habitat List

CategorySub categoryHabitatPresenceStatus
Terrestrial    
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedCultivated / agricultural landPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedManaged forests, plantations and orchardsPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedManaged grasslands (grazing systems)Present, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedDisturbed areasPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedDisturbed areasPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedRail / roadsidesPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedUrban / peri-urban areasPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial – ManagedUrban / peri-urban areasPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalNatural forestsPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalNatural forestsPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalNatural grasslandsPresent, no further detailsHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalNatural grasslandsPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalRiverbanksPrincipal habitatHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalRiverbanksPrincipal habitatNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalWetlandsPrincipal habitatHarmful (pest or invasive)
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalWetlandsPrincipal habitatNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalScrub / shrublandsPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalDesertsPresent, no further detailsNatural
TerrestrialTerrestrial ‑ Natural / Semi-naturalArid regionsPresent, no further detailsNatural
Littoral Coastal areasPresent, no further detailsNatural
Littoral Coastal dunesPresent, no further detailsNatural

Biology and Ecology

Genetics

The chromosome number reported for E. umbellata is 2n = 28 (Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2016). A study by Sabir and Riaz (2005) on E. umbellata populations in northern Pakistan found significant variations in morphological, biochemical and elemental characters, suggesting that variations will be greater still across the entire native range.

Reproductive Biology

E. umbellata flowers are bisexual, fragrant, and open-pollinated often by insects. Mature trees producing about 14 kg of fruit per annum, equivalent to 1.4 kg or 66,000 seeds (Munger, 2003) though PIER (2008) notes production up to 200,000 seeds per year and other reports from the USA suggest rates even higher. Fruiting begins at 3-5 years old under favourable conditions such as full sunlight and adequate moisture. Germination in the USA is much reduced with less than two months of cold temperatures, and is optimum with 4-5 months of cold (Munger, 2003).

Physiology and Phenology

E. umbellata is a relatively shade intolerant pioneer tree, and in its native range in northern India, flowering occurs in April and fruiting in July-August though this varies with the altitude (Parmar and Kaushal, 1982). In China, it produces flowers from April to May and fruits from July to August (Flora of China, 2016). In the United States (central and southern Appalachian regions), fruit ripens in August and September. Fruit generally remains on the plant until late winter. This species generally produces leaves in early spring, prior to most native plants, for example it is one of the first shrubs to break dormancy in Illinois, putting out foliage from mid-March (Munger, 2003).

Associations

It is a nitrogen-fixing species, in association with Actinomycete fungi, Frankia spp. (Dommergues et al., 1999), that also nodulate Hippophae and Shepherdia, but not by strains that colonize other actinorhizal plants such as Casuarina and Alnus. Inocula is available for Elaeagnus species, although inoculation may not be necessary since most plants spontaneously nodulate in the nursery or upon planting in the field, and unlike Rhizobium, Frankia survive in the soil for long period without the presence of host plants (Baker, 1992).

Environmental Requirements

E. umbellata is a tree of humid temperate climates, tolerant of a broad rainfall range from 400 to 4000 mm per annum though it can only tolerate a short dry season. Native to central Asia, it can tolerate very high summer temperature and low winter temperatures.
It grows well on a variety of soils including sandy, loamy, and somewhat clayey soils that are moderate acid or alkaline (pH 4.8-6.5), though prefers deep, relatively coarse-textured soils that are moderately to well-drained. It exhibits some drought tolerance, though does not grow well on very wet or dry sites, nor shallow or poorly drained soils. It does do very well on infertile soils because of its nitrogen-fixing ability. Its shade tolerance is disputed, being reported various as shade intolerant or tolerant, though it appears that it has at least some ability to establish under a forest canopy but is not well-adapted to low light conditions as it is generally absent from dense forest and restricted to open-canopy areas. It does not do well on wet sites or in densely forested areas (Munger, 2003). 

Climate

Climate typeDescriptionPreferred or toleratedRemarks
As - Tropical savanna climate with dry summer< 60mm precipitation driest month (in summer) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25])Tolerated 
B - Dry (arid and semi-arid)< 860mm precipitation annuallyTolerated 
BS - Steppe climate> 430mm and < 860mm annual precipitationPreferred 
BW - Desert climate< 430mm annual precipitationTolerated 
C - Temperate/Mesothermal climateAverage temp. of coldest month > 0°C and < 18°C, mean warmest month > 10°CPreferred 
Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all yearWarm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all yearPreferred 
Cs - Warm temperate climate with dry summerWarm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summersTolerated 
Cw - Warm temperate climate with dry winterWarm temperate climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry winters)Tolerated 

Latitude/Altitude Ranges

Latitude North (°N)Latitude South (°S)Altitude lower (m)Altitude upper (m)
46-2503100

Air Temperature

ParameterLower limit (°C)Upper limit (°C)
Mean annual temperature1428
Mean maximum temperature of hottest month2738
Mean minimum temperature of coldest month-920

Rainfall

ParameterLower limitUpper limitDescription
Dry season duration03number of consecutive months with <40 mm rainfall
Mean annual rainfall4004000mm; lower/upper limits

Rainfall Regime

Summer
Winter
Bimodal
Uniform

Soil Tolerances

Soil texture > light
Soil texture > medium
Soil texture > heavy
Soil reaction > acid
Soil reaction > neutral
Soil reaction > alkaline
Soil drainage > free
Special soil tolerances > shallow
Special soil tolerances > infertile

List of Pests

This content is currently unavailable.

Notes on Natural Enemies

The species-specific rust Aecidium elaeagni-umbellatae was found attacking E. umbellata in China (Huang et al., 2004). This and further pests and pathogens from the native range could be tested as biocontrol agents. Zheng et al. (2006) report that 10 fungi have been found on members of the genus Elaeagnus, including Aecidium elaeagni which may be host-specific to Elaeagnus spp. and Septobasidium albidum which has a host range that includes E. umbellata as well as species in other genera. Also, 22 arthropods belonging to 10 families of five orders are reported, and the moth, Teia prisca may be specific to E. angustifolia. All natural enemies are listed along with whether they are known to attack the three main invasive Elaeagnus spp., E. angustifolia, E. pungens and E. umbellata.

Natural enemies

Natural enemyTypeLife stagesSpecificityReferencesBiological control inBiological control on
Anoplophora chinensis (black and white citrus longhorn)      
Archips fuscocupreanus      
Drosophila suzukii (spotted wing drosophila)      
Halyomorpha halys (brown marmorated stink bug)      

Impact Summary

CategoryImpact
Economic/livelihoodNegative
Environment (generally)Positive and negative

Impact: Economic

In Ontario, Canada, use of E. umbellata as a nurse tree for walnut had mixed effects, as analysis found “generally better walnut growth when interplanted with other woody species, but autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellata), the species that stimulated the best walnut growth, grew invasively throughout the study area, thus ruling it out as a nurse species” (Pedlar et al., 2006). Costs for control are not known.

Impact: Environmental

E. umbellata grows vigorously and is competitive against native species, growing rapidly into impenetrable, thorny thickets, suppressing and/or displacing native and/or more valuable species and supplanting native habitat. Due to nitrogen-fixation, it can affect nitrogen cycling and availability in soils (Baer et al., 2006), and this may adversely effect native communities that may depend on infertile soils. There are also probable allelopathic effects from leaf litter on emergence of seedling of native tree seedlings in central USA (Orr et al., 2005).
Many studies have been undertaken in Illinois, USA. Woody plant invasions including E. umbellata, Rosa multiflora and Ulmus pumila exceeded 6500 stems/ha in successional old fields, and greater than 16,500 stems/ha in sown tallgrass prairie (Zimmerman et al., 1993), with Munger (2003) presenting data showing E. umbellata densities of 5225 stems/ha in pine plantations, increasing to almost 34,000 33,975 stems/ha in a hardwood ravine and almost 68,000 stems/ha in an oak (Quercus spp.) forest. Densities of 125,000 stem/ha were recorded in the understorey of a yellow-poplar-sweetgum plantation from nearby plantings in the early 1970s (Munger, 2003). Yates et al. (2004) found densities of three invasive plants, E. umbellata, Lonicera japonica and Rosa multiflora were up to 180,000 stems/ha, but only E. umbellata was established in both interior and edges of study sites and as such, E. umbellata posed the most ecological damage because it is well established throughout and should be given a high priority when implementing management and control efforts.

Impact: Social

The only social impacts are positive, such as from the aesthetic value as an ornamental species.

Risk and Impact Factors

Invasiveness

Proved invasive outside its native range
Has a broad native range
Abundant in its native range
Highly adaptable to different environments
Is a habitat generalist
Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc
Pioneering in disturbed areas
Highly mobile locally
Long lived
Fast growing
Has high reproductive potential
Has propagules that can remain viable for more than one year
Has high genetic variability

Impact outcomes

Damaged ecosystem services
Ecosystem change/ habitat alteration
Increases vulnerability to invasions
Modification of fire regime
Modification of hydrology
Modification of nutrient regime
Modification of successional patterns
Monoculture formation
Negatively impacts forestry
Negatively impacts tourism
Reduced amenity values
Reduced native biodiversity
Threat to/ loss of native species
Transportation disruption

Impact mechanisms

Allelopathic
Competition - monopolizing resources
Competition - shading
Interaction with other invasive species
Rapid growth

Likelihood of entry/control

Highly likely to be transported internationally deliberately
Difficult/costly to control

Uses

E. umbellata can fix nitrogen and it is tolerant to salt winds, this species is therefore used for fixation of coastal sand dunes in Japan, and is frequently planted mixed with Pinus thunbergii as a soil improving tree. E. umbellata is also planted in eroded areas of mountainous zones to re-establish and develop vegetation. In China it is occasionally cultivated in gardens (Zhang, 1997). The wood is not valuable. The fruits are sweet to acidic and are good to eat along with its seeds, having a good keeping quality and can be stored up to 15 days at room temperature, rich in protein and their use should be encouraged. The fruit are eaten in India, with a single bush yielding about 650 g of fruits in 2-3 pickings (Parmar and Kaushal, 1982). Medicinal products are used in China to treat asthma, diarrhoea (Uehara, 1977), and other plant parts having various additional uses such as pulmonary infections and in cardiac ailments.
E. umbellata was being promoted in North America until recently for the purpose of attracting wildlife, and due to its drought and disease resistance and tolerance of poor soil, it has also been widely planted on poor sites and roadsides to prevent soil erosion. It is also being promoted as a possible source of pharmaceutical compounds, as the edible fruit is exceptionally high in the antioxidant carotenoid lycopene and several other carotenoids, and lycopene has been associated with prevention of certain chronic diseases including prostate cancer (Fordham et al., 2003). Naturalised populations were assessed for their potential to supply fruit for nutraceutical use and could be a commercially viable crop, especially on low-fertility and sandy soils that may be unsuitable for other agricultural uses (Black et al., 2005). The plant is very ornamental because of its silvery foliage and flowers. It is a very hardy plant and grows successfully under dry conditions. It can therefore, be planted as a protective hedge around fields as a well as around houses and gardens.
E. umbellata has been promoted as a beneficial wildlife species and was widely planted in wildlife management areas in the USA as an important wildlife food during periods of seasonal food scarcity, fruits consumed by a variety of wildlife, including very many different birds, raccoons, skunks, opossums and black bears and white-tailed deer browse the foliage (Munger, 2003).

Uses List

General > Ornamental
Environmental > Agroforestry
Environmental > Amenity
Environmental > Boundary, barrier or support
Environmental > Erosion control or dune stabilization
Environmental > Land reclamation
Environmental > Revegetation
Environmental > Shade and shelter
Environmental > Soil conservation
Environmental > Soil improvement
Environmental > Wildlife habitat
Environmental > Windbreak
Environmental > Ornamental
Medicinal, pharmaceutical > Source of medicine/pharmaceutical
Medicinal, pharmaceutical > Traditional/folklore
Fuels > Fuelwood
Human food and beverage > Fruits
Human food and beverage > Honey/honey flora
Human food and beverage > Seeds
Animal feed, fodder, forage > Forage

Prevention and Control

Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.

Control

Controlling invasive E. umbellata may require frequent monitoring and repeated treatments to achieve success, and because seeds can be dispersed long distances by birds, it should also be eradicated in surrounding areas. If the infested area is large or if eradication of surrounding populations is not feasible, land managers should focus control efforts in the most ecologically significant and/or least invaded areas first. In closed-canopy forests, control can likely be achieved through routine monitoring and eradication of new individuals by hand pulling or spot applications of herbicide, and where appropriate, maintaining dense, frequently mowed grass or other dense native vegetation can help prevent establishment of seedlings (Munger, 2003).

Cultural control and sanitary measures

A 25-year study in Illinois, USA found prairies invaded by Cornus drummundii and Prunus serotina with Cornus florida and exotic E. umbellata dominating on the edges, and cutting combined with controlled burning was recommended to increase the size of the hill prairie (Owens and Cole, 2003). The use of fire in areas where E. umbellata is present may be appropriate depending on management objectives and habitats invaded (see Munger, 2003).

Physical/mechanical control

Hand pulling young seedlings can be effective especially in moist soil, and seedlings are easiest to identify in early spring in the USA as they produce leaves earlier than most native shrubs. Mowed or cut plants resprout vigorously so physical methods alone will probably not be effective, and even repeated cutting is apparently ineffective without treating stumps and/or resprouts with herbicide (Munger, 2003).

Biological control

A species-specific rust was found attacking E. umbellata in China, Aecidium elaeagni-umbellatae (Huang et al., 2004), and this and further pests and pathogens from the native range could be tested as biocontrol agents.

Chemical control

Several herbicides have been used alone or in combination to provide effective control (see Sather and Eckardt, 2001; Munger, 2003). Dicamba, glyphosate or 2,4-D (but not metsulfuron methyl) have been used as effective foliar-applied herbicides especially on shorter plants, and on larger plants, glyphosate, triclopyr and/or 2,4-D used effectively on resprouts, or basal-bark applications of triclopyr. In invaded tree plantation in Illinois, USA, triclopyr reduced E. umbellata from 12.5 to 3.9 stems/m2, but recommended that intensive control efforts focusing on relatively small areas in large well-established populations are only moderately effective and control efforts must be repeated every 5 years to achieve eradication (Edgin and Ebinger, 2001).

Silviculture Characteristics

Tolerates > drought
Tolerates > wind
Tolerates > frost
Tolerates > salt wind
Ability to > sucker
Ability to > fix nitrogen

Silviculture Practice

Seed storage > intermediate
Vegetative propagation by > cuttings
Vegetative propagation by > air layering
Vegetative propagation by > sets
Vegetative propagation by > tissue culture
Stand establishment using > direct sowing
Stand establishment using > planting stock

References

Baer SG, Church JM, Williard KWJ, Groninger JW, 2006. Changes in intrasystem N cycling from N2-fixing shrub encroachment in grassland: multiple positive feedbacks. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 115(1/4):174-182.
Baker D, 1992. Elaeagnus: a widely distributed temperate nitrogen fixer. NFT Highlights, No. 92-07. Waimanalo, USA: Nitrogen Fixing Tree Association (NFTA), 2 pp.
Bean WJ, 1973. Trees and shrubs hardy in the British Isles, Vol. II, D-M. 1973, Ed. 8, xvi + 784 pp.; 96 fig., 106 pl., 150 X 225 mm.
Black BL, Fordham IM, Perkins-Veazie P, 2005. Autumnberry (Elaeagnus umbellata): a potential cash crop. Journal of the American Pomological Society, 59(3):125-134.
CABI, 2005. Forestry Compendium. Wallingford, UK: CABI.
Catling PM, Oldham MJ, Sutherland DA, Brownell VR, Larson BMH, 1997. The recent spread of autumn-olive, Elaeagnus umbellata, into southern Ontario and its current status. Canadian Field Naturalist, 111(3):376-380.
Christenhusz MJM, 2009. Elaeagnus umbellata Thunb. Flora Mesoamericana [ed. by Davidse, G. \Sousa Sánchez, M. \Knapp, S. \Chiang Cabrera, F.]. St Louis, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden.
Christenhusz MJM, Uffelen GAvan, 2001. Naturalized Japanese plants in the Netherlands, introduced by Von Siebold. Gorteria, 27(5):97-108.
Clark JR, Hemery GE, Savill PS, 2008. Early growth and form of common walnut (<i>Juglans regia</i> L.) in mixture with tree and shrub nurse species in southern England. Forestry (Oxford), 81(5):631-644. http://forestry.oxfordjournals.org/
DAISIE, 2016. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. European Invasive Alien Species Gateway. www.europe-aliens.org/default.do
Dommergues Y, Duhoux E, Diem HG, 1999. Les Arbres Fixateurs d'Azote: Caractéristiques Fondamentales et Rôle dans L'aménagement des Écosystèmes Méditerranéens et Tropicaux ([English title not available]). Montpellier, France: CIRAD.
Drénou Ch, Paulus J, 2004. Effect of companion species on tree form. (Effets de l'accompagnement sur la forme des arbres.) Forêt-Entreprise, No.159:52-55.
Ebinger J, Lehnen L, 1981. Naturalized autumn olive in Illinois. Transactions, Illinois State Academy of Science, 74(3/4):83-85.
Edgin B, Ebinger JE, 2001. Control of autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellata Thunb.) at Beall Woods Nature Preserve, Illinois, USA. Natural Areas Journal, 21(4):386-388.
Flora of China Editorial Committee, 2016. Flora of China. St. Louis, Missouri and Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Missouri Botanical Garden and Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2
Fordham IM, Zimmerman RH, Black BL, Clevidence BM, Wiley ER, 2003. Autumn olive: a potential alternative crop. Acta Horticulturae [Berry crop breeding, production and utilization for a new century. Proceedings of the XXVI International Horticultural Congress, Toronto, Canada, 11-17 August 2002.], No.626:429-431.
Horikawa Yoshiwo, 1972. Atlas of the Japanese Flora II. An introduction to plant sociology of East Asia. Tokyo, Japan: Gakken Co. Ltd.
Huang Yun, Ye HuaZhi, Dong BaoCheng, Liu ZiYing, Qin Yun, 2004. Rust of Elaeagnus umbellata and rust fungus hyperparasite. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 31(2):134-138.
ISSG, 2016. Global Invasive Species Database (GISD). Invasive Species Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission. http://www.issg.org/database/welcome/
Iwakawa M, 1985. Elaeagnus umbellata (in Japanese). In: Sakaguchi K. ed. Knowledge of Useful Hardwood. Tokyo, Japan: Rigyo Kagaku Gijyutu Sinkousyo, 405-406.
Kurata S, 1973. Illustrated Important Forest Trees of Japan. Vol.4. Tokyo, Japan: Chikyu Syuppan Co. Ltd.
Mir C, 2012. Estrategia Nacional de Especies Exóticas Invasoras Realizado en el marco del Proyecto "Mitigando las amenazas de las especies exóticas invasoras en el Caribe Insular" ([English title not available])., Dominican Republic: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales Santo Domingo.
Munger GT, 2003. Elaeagnus umbellata. Fire Effects Information System [Online]. USA: USDA-FS. http://www.us/database/feis/plants/shrub/elaumb/all
Niu Chunshan, 1990. Trees of Shaanxi. Beijing, China: Chinese Forestry Publishing House.
Ohba H, 1999. Elaeagnaceae. In: Iwatsuki K, Boufford D, Ohba H, eds. Flora of Japan Volume IIc. Tokyo, Japan: Kodansha Ltd., 152-158.
Orr SP, Rudgers JA, Clay K, 2005. Invasive plants can inhibit native tree seedlings: testing potential allelopathic mechanisms. Plant Ecology, 181(2):153-165. http://springerlink.metapress.com/link.asp?id=100328
Owens NL, Cole GN, 2003. 25 Years of vegetational changes in a Glacial Drift Hill Prairie community in East-Central Illinois. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science, 96(4):265-269.
Parmar C, Kaushal MK, 1982. Wild Fruits. New Delhi, India: Kalyani Publishers, 23-25.
Pedlar JH, McKenney DW, Fraleigh S, 2006. Planting black walnut in southern Ontario: midrotation assessment of growth, yield, and silvicultural treatments. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36(2):495-504.
PIER, 2008. Pacific Islands Ecosystems at Risk. USA: Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry. http://www.hear.org/pier/index.html
Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney, 2008. Australia's Virtual Herbarium. Sydney, Australia: Royal Botanic Gardens. http://avhtas.tmag
Sabir SM, Riaz K, 2005. Morphological, biochemical and elemental analysis of Elaeagnus umbellata, a multipurpose wild shrub from Pakistan. Journal of Applied Horticulture (Lucknow), 7(2):113-116.
Sather N, Eckardt N, 2001. Elaeagnus umbellata, Autumn Olive. Element Stewardship Abstract. Arlington, Virginia, USA: The Nature Conservancy. http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/esadocs/documnts/elaeumb.pdf
Stevens PF, 2012. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/
Uehara K, 1977. Encyclopaedia of Trees with Illustrations (in Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: Ariake Publishing Co. Ltd.
USDA-ARS, 2008. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
USDA-ARS, 2016. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). National Plant Germplasm System. Online Database. Beltsville, Maryland, USA: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch.aspx
USDA-NRCS, 2008. The PLANTS Database. Baton Rouge, USA: National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov/
USDA-NRCS, 2016. The PLANTS Database. Baton Rouge, USA: National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov/
Vidya Thakur, Chauhan JC, Sanjay Tomar, 1996. Regeneration potential of Elaeagnus umbellata Thunb. through seeds under natural conditions in mid hills of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Forestry, 19(4):322-325; 17 ref.
Yates ED, Levia DF Jr, Williams CL, 2004. Recruitment of three non-native invasive plants into a fragmented forest in southern Illinois. Forest Ecology and Management, 190(2/3):119-130.
Zhang ZR, 1997. Elaeagnaceae (in Chinese). In: Zheng WJ, ed. Silva Sinica 3. Beijing, China: China Forestry Publishing House, 3749-3785.
Zheng H, Wu Y, Ding J, Binion D, Fu W, Reardon R, 2006. Invasive plants of Asian origin established in the US and their natural enemies. Volume 1. Chinese Academy of Sciences and USDA Forest Service. http:\\www.us/foresthealth/technology/pdfs/IPAOv1ed2.pdf
Zimmerman UD, Ebinger JE, Diekroeger KC, 1993. Alien and native woody species invasion of abandoned crop land and reestablished tallgrass prairie in East-Central Illinois. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science, 86(3-4):111-118.
Zitzer SF, Dawson JO, Gertner GZ, Rink G (ed. ), Budelsky CA, 1989. Seasonal changes in nitrogen fixation activity of European black alder and Russian olive. Seventh Central Hardwood Forest Conference. Proceedings of a meeting held at Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, March 5-8, 1989. General-Technical-Report -North-Central-Forest-Experiment-Station,-USDA-Forest-Service, No. NC-132, 134-140; 14 ref.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 11 November 2016

Language

English

Authors

Affiliations

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation