Author: Daryl Gunning
August 2016
Cultivating Salicornia europaea (Marsh Samphire)
Contents
1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1. Halophytes ............................................................................................................................ 1
1.2. Marsh Samphire – Salicornia europaea .................................................................... 1
1.2.1. Classification and description .............................................................................. 2
1.2.2. Geographical range and habitat ........................................................................... 5
1.3. Historical, current, and potential uses of Salicornia europaea ..................... 9
1.3.1. Glass and soap ............................................................................................................. 9
1.3.2. Nutrition and culinary ............................................................................................. 9
1.3.3. Oil seed ........................................................................................................................ 10
1.3.4. Forage/feed crop..................................................................................................... 11
1.3.5. Medicinal .................................................................................................................... 11
1.4. Historical Aquaculture – wastewater management ........................................ 12
2. Commercial cultivation .......................................................................................................... 15
2.1. The Middle East ............................................................................................................... 15
2.2. Mexico.................................................................................................................................. 20
2.3. Europe ................................................................................................................................. 23
2.4. UK. ......................................................................................................................................... 24
2.5. Ireland ................................................................................................................................. 26
2.6. Selective breeding and bacterial assisted growth of Salicornia ................. 27
3. Growing Salicornia europaea ............................................................................................... 28
3.1. Pre-germination treatment – Cold stratification .............................................. 28
3.2. Early germination ........................................................................................................... 29
3.3. Seedling development .................................................................................................. 32
3.4. On-growing stage............................................................................................................ 35
3.4.1. Aeroponics ................................................................................................................. 35
3.4.2. Aeroponic propagators......................................................................................... 36
3.4.3. On-growing with aeroponics ............................................................................. 42
3.5. Samphire flowering ....................................................................................................... 43
4. Seed sourcing .............................................................................................................................. 46
4.1. Wild source........................................................................................................................ 46
4.2. UK/European nursery sources ................................................................................. 47
4.3. Seed saving & storage ................................................................................................... 47
5. Irish oyster hatchery wastewater – samphire growth trial .................................. 48
5.1. Aim ........................................................................................................................................ 48
5.2. Methods .............................................................................................................................. 49
5.2.1. Cold stratification.................................................................................................... 49
5.2.2. Early germination ................................................................................................... 50
5.2.3. Seedling development ........................................................................................... 52
5.2.4. On-growing ................................................................................................................ 54
5.3. Results ................................................................................................................................. 57
5.4. Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 65
6. Other halophytes with commercial potential ............................................................... 68
6.1. Sea kale (Crambe maritima)....................................................................................... 68
6.2. Sea aster (Tripolium pannonicum) .......................................................................... 72
6.3. Results Sea purslane (Atriplex portulacoides) .................................................... 76
7. Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 79
8. References .................................................................................................................................... 81
9. Appendices .................................................................................................................................. 88
9.1. List of Israel exporters of Salicornia....................................................................... 88
9.2. Technique for measuring growth ............................................................................ 88
9.3. How to use Excel to randomise a data set............................................................ 90
9.4. Ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, and phosphate levels in oyster hatchery
wastewater before and after treatment with samphire ................................ 91
9.5. List of halophyte plant and seed suppliers .......................................................... 92
Written by: Daryl Gunning (Daithi O’ Murchu Marine Research Station &
University College Cork).
Edited by: Lucy Watson, BIM.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Laura Barrett, IT Tralee, for her help in conducting the Irish
Samphire grow out trials and all members of staff at the hatchery for allowing
me to use their facilities. To Lucy Watson and Professor Gavin Burnell, for their
guidance and edits to the manual as it was being compiled.
1. Introduction
1.1 Halophytes
Our planet is currently experiencing a crisis of dwindling fresh water supplies and
salinization of soil and groundwater (Singh, et al. 2014 and Ventura and Sagi,
2012). This water shortage is expected to increase in the future due to a growing
world population and rise in prosperity (De Vos et al. 2010). Already, almost onethird of the area farmed (380 million Ha) is affected by salinity (Ramani et al.
2006). With this in mind, it is essential that we develop new crops that have a
greater salt tolerance than conventional agricultural crops (Ventura et al. 2011a).
One option is to increase the salt-resistance of our salt sensitive conventional
agricultural crops through conventional breeding programs or by developing
genetically adapted plants. However, results from initial work on such techniques
have been disappointing. Another option is to domesticate halophytes for
commercial crop production (Ventura and Sagi, 2013). A halophyte is “a naturally
evolved salt-tolerant plant that has adapted to grow in saline environments”. In
some cases halophytes require this exposure to salinity to survive (Singh et al.
2014 and Ramani, et al. 2006). Halophytes also have numerous commercial
applications and potential, such as: raw material for vegetable or fodder, a source
of oilseed with a high nutritional value, use as a biofuel precursor, and they can be
used
as
secondary metabolites
in
pharmaceuticals,
food
additives, and
nutraceuticals (Buhmann et al. 2015; Fan et al. 2013; and Liu et al. 2005).
Note: “Saltwort” is also a common name given to various genera of flowering plants that
thrive in salty environments. Saltworts include plants from the following genera: Salsola,
Salicornia, Tecticornia, Sarcocornia, Suaeda, and Halogeton
1.2 Marsh Samphire – Salicornia europaea
One such halophyte that has enormous potential in Ireland is Marsh Samphire
(Salicornia europaea L.). Marsh samphire is common on the coastline of Ireland
and the UK and has a long history of utilisation by humans. Over the past 5 years
or so, it has gained huge popularity, especially in culinary circles, being a very
1
popular addition to the menus of restaurants the length and breadth of the
country.
1.2.1 Classification and description
S. europaea (Table 1) is a succulent annual (a plant that completes its life-cycle,
from germination to production of seed, within one year, and then dies) halophyte
with extremely reduced leaves (scale-like formations) and a spike-like terminal
inflorescence (Singh et al. 2014). It stands erect, up to 35cm, and is fairly richly
branched. It is dark green in colour, becoming yellowish green and ultimately
flushed pink or red towards the end of its life-cycle (Figure 1) (Davy et al. 2001).
Table 1: Scientific Classification of Salicornia europaea
Kingdom
Plantae (Angiosperm)
Class
Eudicots
Order
Caryophyllales
Family
Amaranthaceae
Genus
Salicornia
Species
Salicornia europaea L.
Samphire plants produce minute flowers and under natural conditions usually
produce them in August and September (Devlin, 2015d). There are usually 1-3
flowers per cyme (an arrangement of flowers in a plant inflorescence), with
the lateral flowers one to two-thirds as large as the central flower. These
flowers occur on the spikes (Figure 2) (Singh et al. 2014).
Although Salicornia spp. can grow successfully in highly saline environments, their
germination is inhibited by high salinity and, generally, seed germination in
European coastal halophytes occurs in early spring, when salinity is reduced by
high freshwater soil moisture content and relatively low temperatures (Singh et al.
2014 and Khan and Weber, 1989).
2
Terminal spike
Spike
Branch
Main stem
Node
Root
Figure 1: Morphology of marsh samphire (source: Biolib.de)
3
Figure 2: Flowers on the spikes of marsh samphire
4
1.2.2 Geographical range and habitat
The genus Salicornia is widely dispersed in Eurasia, North America, and South
Africa (Singh et al. 2014). From a European context, Salicornia can be found on
much of its coastline, from the Arctic to the Mediterranean and on the shores of
the Black and Caspian Sea (Figure 3). It can also be found sporadically where
inland saline waters occur across Europe (Davy et al. 2001). Salicornia europaea
is the most widely distributed species in the Salicornia genus across the UK and
Ireland (Figure 4).
5
Figure 3: The distribution of Salicornia europaea aggregate in Europe. Each dot represents at least one
record in a 50km square. (+) extinct; ( x ) probably extinct (Source: Davy et al. 2001)
6
Figure 4: Distribution of Salicornia europaea across the UK and Ireland; cream squares represent
recorded sightings from pre 1930; light orange/orange squares represent recorded sightings from
1930-2009; red squares represent recorded sightings from 2010 onwards (Source: BSBI 2015)
7
Marsh samphire can be found at all levels (low to high) of sandy and/or muddy
saltmarshes, in the transitional area of saltmarsh to sand dunes, dune-slacks
inundated with the tide, in channels and pans, mudflats, sandflats, and, on
occasion, in open saline areas (e.g. behind sea-walls) (National Parks and Wildlife
Service, 2014 & 2013, Davy et al. 2001 and Jefferies et al. 1981). Marsh samphire
in intertidal habitats grows on a range of marine sediments; from silts to fine
clays and in gravels and shelly-sand. On occasions, where marsh samphire is
found in inland saline environments, the substrates can vary from fine clays to
coarse sands. These substrates tend to be saline, brackish, or alkaline (Davy et al.
2001) (Figure 5).
Figure 5: Marsh samphire (outlined in red) in a saltmarsh; Fota Island, Co. Cork
8
1.3 Historical, current, and potential uses of Salicornia europaea
1.3.1 Glass and soap
In the 16th century, the word “glasswort” was coined to describe plants (wild or
cultivated) growing in England that could be used for making soda-based glass
(Oxford Dictionary, 1989). Marsh samphire is high in soda (sodium carbonate)
and the burning of this plant releases sodium more easily than common salt. In
medieval and early post-medieval centuries, marsh samphire was gathered and
burned in heaps and the ash fused with sand to make glass. When a better quality
glass was required, the ash was leached with limewater to make a solution of
caustic soda, which was evaporated and added to the silica. Marsh samphire ash
was also mixed with animal fats for its use in soap production. However, it is
important to note that the term “Soapwort” does not refer to Salicornia spp,
instead referring to the genus, Saponaria (Vernon, 2013). The appearance of
“glasswort” as an English word in the 16th century coincided with the resurgence
of English glassmaking, having experienced a decline after the Roman Empire era.
Glassmakers who emigrated to England from Lorraine and Venice led this
resurgence. These glassmakers, especially those from Venice whom were
proficient in the technology of cristallo (producing immaculately clear glass by
using soda ash as a flux), would have recognised marsh samphire as a source of
soda ash (Kurinsky, 1991 and Haden, 1978). In 1790, the French chemist and
surgeon, Nicolas Leblanc, developed an effective process for obtaining soda from
sodium chloride (common salt). The Leblanc process dominated world
production of soda ash for the remainder of the 19th century, bringing the era of
extracting soda ash from saltwort plants to an end (Encyclopaedia of Britannica,
2015 and Clow and Clow, 1952).
1.3.2 Nutrition and culinary
Historically, many cultures across the globe have consumed marsh samphire for
nutritional and culinary purposes; reflective in the multitude of common names it
has
been
attributed:
marsh
samphire
(English),
glasört
(Swedish),
toongtoongmadi (Koren), zeekraal (Dutch), almyrides (Greek), and yan jiao cao
and hamcho (Chinese) (Price, 2007). Marsh samphire has served as a functional
9
food in colder coastal regions of Northern Europe, providing a high level of
vitamin C in spring, following a winter in which few nutrient-rich vegetables
would have been available (Price, 2007).
nutritional
components
(carotenes,
In 1997, Guil et al. examined the
ascorbic
acid
{Vitamin
C},
and
dehydroascorbic acid {oxidised Vitamin C}) of various wild, edible plants,
including marsh samphire. It was found that marsh samphire has very high levels
of ascorbic and dehydroascorbic acid (over 100mg/100g) (Guil et al. 1997). The
European Union’s recommended daily allowance (RDA) of Vitamin C (80mg/day)
could therefore be easily achieved by consuming approximately 80g of this
vegetable (European Union, 2008). Marsh samphire is also a good source of
carotenoids (c. 5mg/100g), which act as an antioxidant with strong cancer
fighting properties (Guil et al. 1997).
The culinary interest in marsh samphire in the UK and Ireland has increased
considerably over the past number of years. This tasty vegetable is commonly
available at markets (e.g. the English Market in Cork City) and at various
restaurants across the country, usually as an accompaniment to fish dishes. A
testament to the popularity of this vegetable is the fact that famous Irish
Executive Head Chef, Tom Walsh, named a restaurant after samphire, one of his
favourite sea vegetables. Samphire at the Waterside, located in Donabate Co.
Dublin, commonly has samphire on the menu. Marsh samphire has made its way
onto the menu of many famous restaurants across Ireland, including but not
limited to; Greenes and Elbow Lane in Cork City and Chapter One and Fade Street
Social in Dublin.
1.3.3 Oil seed
When the fatty acid composition of marsh samphire seed oil was analysed by Liu
et al. (2005), it was found that the oil was nutritive and the health value was high.
There were five main components discovered: linoleic acid (75.62%), oleic acid
(13.04%), palmitic acid (7.02%), linolenic acid (2.63%), and stearic acid (2.37%)
(Liu et al. 2005). Austenfeld, (1986) also found that a high percentage of these
fatty acids consisted of the unsaturated linoleic (77%) and oleic (13%) acid
(Austenfeld, 1986). A study conducted by Glenn et al. (1991) on another species of
Salicornia, Salicornia bigelovii, found that the yield of seed and biomass equalled
10
or exceeded freshwater oilseed crops such as soybean and sunflower. The seeds
were very low in fibre and ash (5-7%) and contained 26-33% oil and 31%
protein. The oil was particularly high in polyunsaturated fatty acids, particularly
linoleic acid, at 73-75% of the oil. Another benefit to using Salicornia seed as a
source of oil seed is that the oil and meal can be extracted with standard milling
equipment (Glenn, et al. 1991).
1.3.4 Forage/feed crop
Marsh samphire has the potential to be used as a livestock feed. Glenn et al.
(1998) conducted a study in Arizona, USA and found that sheep and goats fed
diets containing S. bigelovii gained as much weight as those fed a diet containing
hay and the quality of their meat was unaffected by eating a diet rich in S.
bigelovii. However, the feed conversion ratio (the amount of meat they produced
per kilogramme of feed) was 10% lower than that of animals eating a traditional
diet. They also found that S. bigelovii seed meal was a suitable alternative to
conventional seed meals as a protein supplement in livestock diets (Glenn et al.
1998). Although this work was not conducted on S. europaea (marsh samphire), S.
bigelovii is a very similar plant, within the same family as marsh samphire.
Research conducted on Salicornia cultivation in Kuwait revealed that lambs had
the best growth rate when fed a traditional alfalfa diet incorporated with 12.5%
Salicornia (Abdal, 2009) (section 2.1).
1.3.5 Medicinal
Halophytes have developed several adaptive responses to living in extreme saline
conditions; including the synthesis of several bioactive molecules (primary and
secondary metabolites). A number of studies conducted on halophytes have
indicated that many of these species have a high content of polyunsaturated fatty
acids, carotenoids, vitamins, sterols, essential oils (terpenes), polysaccharides,
glycosides, and phenolic compounds. These compounds have a number of
medicinal properties, including: antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory,
and anti-tumour activities, with application in the treatment of various diseases
(e.g. cancer, chronic inflammation, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disorder)
and ageing processes (Ksouri et al. 2011). There is growing interest amongst the
11
medical-science community in the natural antioxidants that halophytes
contain as they
exhibit
sometimes exceed
a
strong
biological
or
These antioxidants
the performance of many natural antioxidants from
medicinal glycophytes (any plant that will
zero
activity.
low content
grow
healthily
in
soils
with
of salt) or synthetic antioxidants, which have to be
restricted due to their potential carcinogenicity (Suhaj, 2006). Halophytes have
considerable potential in the areas of nutracueticals (the integration of
nutrition and pharmaceutics - consumed as capsules, pills, and tablets) and
functional foods (always consumed as ordinary food {when a phytochemical
is included in food formulation, it is also considered a functional food}) (Ksouri,
et al. 2011).
A study conducted by Rhee et al. (2009) showed that Salicornia herbacea
(a synonym of Salicornia europaea {Asia}) contained the following compounds:
tungtungmadic acid, quercetin 3-0-glucoside, and isorhamnetin 3-0-glucoside.
These
compounds
show
various
pharmacological
properties
including:
antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory activities (Rhee et
al. 2009). In another study, Lee et al. (2006) isolated polysaccharides from S.
herbacea
and
demonstrated
their
ability
to
activate
macrophages.
Macrophages are a type of white blood cell that engulf and digest cellular debris,
foreign substances, microbes, and cancer cells, and play a significant role in the
host’s defence mechanism (Ksouri et al. 2011 and Lee et al. 2006). With
these compounds, S. herbacea has a potential application in the treatment of
constipation, obesity, diabetes, and cancer (Ksouri, et al. 2011).
1.4 Aquaculture - wastewater management
Although Ireland may not be experiencing a salinization crisis, the cultivation of
halophytes as a commercial crop should be given serious consideration. Marine
aquaculture farms can discharge large volumes of wastewater containing
excreta, food waste, and
dissolved
metabolites such as organic matter,
inorganic nitrogen, and phosphorous into surrounding waters (Webb et
2012).
In 2014, the aquaculture industry accounted
al.
for 47% (51 million
tonnes) of global human fish consumption. It has been predicted that this output
12
will increase by 60-100% over the next 20-30 years as the world population
grows and per capita fish consumption increases (Turcios and Papenbrock,
2014). Left untreated, aquaculture effluent has the potential to impact
upon wildlife, tourism, and fisheries (Brown et al. 1999). High amounts of
suspended organic solids can damage the gills of cultured and wild organisms. Also,
when these organic solids become mineralised, ammonia is produced. Ammonia
can be quite toxic to aquatic life and the level that animals can tolerate is species
dependent (Buhmann and Papenbrock, 2013).
Although natural fish stocks and eligible coastal areas for aquaculture
are decreasing, global seafood demand is increasing. In order to provide for
this demand,
while
reducing
subsequent
environmental
impacts,
it
is
necessary to develop intensive inland fish cultures with efficient systems
for wastewater treatment (Turcios and Papenbrock, 2014 and Buhmann and
Papenbrock, 2013). In conventional inland aquaculture farms effluent is treated
through mechanical methods. Although these methods are effective, they tend
to be costly in terms
of
capital investment, energy
consumption,
and
maintenance requirements (Webb et al. 2012).
Operating halophytes as a plant biofilter (use of living material to capture
and biologically degrade pollutants) of marine aquaculture effluent is a low
cost opportunity to mitigate potential negative impacts on the environment
(Buhmann et al. 2015).
A recent study by Diaz et al. (2013) found that a number of halophytic
species (Salicornia bigelovii, Atriplex lentiformis, Distichlis spicata, Spartina gracilis,
Allenrolfea occidentalis, and Bassia hyssopifolia) grown under irrigation with
saline drainage water over a 4-6 year period in the San Joaquin Valley of
California grew very successfully and can effectively reduce saline drainage
effluent.
Studies have also been conducted on the suitability of Salicornia spp. as a
wastewater biofilter. Shpigel et al. (2013) demonstrated that a constructed
wetland (CW) planted with Salicornia persica was effective in the removal of
N, P, and total suspended solids (TSS) from a 1,000m3 commercial, intensive,
semi-recirculated aquaculture system growing
100
tonnes of
gilt-head
seabream (1-500g in size). It was estimated that about 10,000m2 of
wetland planted with with S.persica would be required to remove nitrogen and
13
TSS in wastewater during one year. This study also found that an average yield
of 10,000m2 of S. persica would be expected to produce about 28.8 tonnes
(2.88 kg m-2 y-1). The upper (edible) part constitutes approximately 80% of
the yield, therefore, the marketable yield would be about 23 tonnes of fresh
produce (Shipigel et al. 2013). Although using CWs for effluent treatment
requires a relatively extensive area, a cost-effective analysis conducted by
Cardoch et al. (2000) found that treatment by wetland costs approximately 75%
less to the farmer than conventional onsite treatment (Cardoch et al. 2000).
The use of a CW to treat aquaculture wastewater can be even more costeffective if the wetland is planted with a crop that has market demand or
potential market demand (Shipigel et al. 2013). The commercial application cost of
CWs is estimated to be €0.20 per kg of fish produced. Therefore, the cost
of the construction and operation of a CW for, for example, 500 tonnes of fish
would be €100,000. With a conservative price of €6 kg-1 (fresh weight) the
income from 23 tonnes of S. persica is expected to be €138,000 based
on gross calculations. Another
method
for
offsetting
the
cost of CW
operations is to exploit it as a natural park or tourist attraction (eco-tourism)
(Shipigel et al. 2013 and Sindilariu et al. 2008).
Marsh samphire (S. europaea) has also been shown to have significant
potential in the treatment of aquaculture effluent. Webb et al. (2012) constructed
a wetland filter bed planted with marsh samphire to evaluate its ability to
treat the wastewater from a commercially operated marine fish and shrimp
farm. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of a marsh samphire wetland in
removing N and P from the wastewater, with 91-99% of influent dissolved
inorganic nitrogen and 41-88% of influent dissolved inorganic phosphorus
removed (Webb et al. 2012).
A marsh samphire growth trial was conducted from May to September 2015
using the wastewater from an Irish oyster hatchery to irrigate the plants (Section
5).
14
2. Commercial cultivation
The agricultural development of halophyte crops is still in its infancy, and due to
its novelty, businesses involved in their culture are understandably wary about
revealing too much information on their growth methods. Despite this, a number
of examples of Salicornia spp. commercial production and/or trials are detailed in
this section.
2.1 The Middle East
In Israel, Salicornia is produced on a commercial scale for local and international
markets (Ventura and Sagi, 2013), with a number of companies (e.g. Flora Export
S.E Israel Ltd, Farmers Direct Ltd, Agrexco, and Bacto Sil Ltd) responsible
for exporting Israeli-produced Salicornia around the globe (see Section 9.1 for
information on these export companies). The cultivation of Salicornia is typically
practised under simple nets or in greenhouses that occupy an area of
approximately 0.5-1ha. In order to maintain the Salicornia at a high enough
standard for market, the young shoots must be harvested manually, a labour
intensive element that is critical to halophyte crop production. The most common
and straightforward method for growing Salicornia in Israel is to cultivate it in
native sand dunes watered with drip irrigation. This has been achieved successfully
by some farmers in the Dead Sea and Ramat Hanegev regions (Figure 6a). When
growing plants for vegetable production, only the fresh and tender parts of
the plant are acceptable (Ventura and Sagi, 2013). Ventura et al. (2011b)
developed a repeated harvesting regime (every 2, 3, or 4 weeks depending on the
level of growth), by which the plants were cut (approximately 5cm above ground
level – a “cutting table” height) for the first time when the shoots were
approximately 10-15cm in height. After shoot re-growth, the plants undergo a
number of repeated harvests, being cut back to the “cutting table” height (Figure
6b) (Ventura et al. 2011b).
15
Figure 6: a) Salicornia growing on native sand dunes watered via drip
irrigation; b) sand dune culture after harvesting to ‘cutting table’ height
(Source: Ventura and Sagi, 2013)
In areas of Israel where cultivation of Salicornia with native sand dune soil is not
possible, growing systems detached from the native soil have been developed.
Although these soilless systems which use inert (not chemically reactive)
mediums (e.g. perlite or dune sand) are more labour intensive and costly, their
irrigation regimes are more flexible in relation to the concentrations of salt that
can be applied. Examples of soilless culture systems that have been utilised
successfully in Israel for the culturing of Salicornia are: plastic sheet troughs
containing an inert media (drip irrigation); raised beds containing an inert media
(drip irrigation); floating units containing perlite; surface-flow constructed
wetlands; and coconut-fibre-filled sleeves within a subsurface flow-through
system (Figure 7) (Ventura and Sagi, 2013). Detailed information on these growth
methods being utilised in Israel is not currently available.
16
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Figure 7: Salicornia growing in: a) drip-irrigated troughs built with plastic sheets (inert media); b)
drip-irrigated raised beds (inert media); c) perlite filled floating units; d) a surface-flow constructed
wetland; and e) a subsurface flow-through system (medium – coconut fibre sleeves) (Source:
Ventura and Sagi, 2013).
17
The largest producer of Salicornia in Israel, “Ein Mor Crops Ltd” of Kadesh Barnea,
has more than 15 years of experience culturing Salicornia in a greenhouse
environment. They export over 150 tonnes of Salicornia every year to Europe
through
various
export
companies
(http://www.tradekey.com/product-
free/Salicornia-5032009.html).
The soil in Kuwait is sandy in texture and has a low nutrient content and water
holding capacity. The availability of irrigation water for conventional crop
production (glycophytes) is limited to desalinated seawater (very expensive to
produce) and brackish water (too saline for conventional crop production). For
agriculture to expand in Kuwait’s difficult environment of salty waters, sandy
soils, and harsh climates, the Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research believe
plants that can tolerate the salinity and heat need to be researched for their
potential as commercial crops. In cooperation with the University of Arizona, field
trials on Salicornia spp. were conducted in Medairah, approximately 1km from
the shore of Kuwait Bay. Fifty 20m X 8m plots were constructed for agronomic
research trials. The salinity of the irrigation water for these trials was 25-33 g/L
(close to the concentration of seawater). The biomass potential of Salicornia
based upon different seeding dates and the potential for Salicornia as animal
fodder was assessed. The total biomass (air-dried) achieved from all the plots was
approximately 27 tonnes/ha (approximately 8 months after first seeding). These
trials indicated that early October is the best seeding time for maximum biomass
production, with plants seeded in October 1st or 15th having approximately 50%
higher biomass than plants seeded on September 14th or November 1st. Plants
seeded as late as January 1st had less than half the biomass of plants seeded in
October (Note: The timing of Salicornia seeding for field production is dependent
on local conditions and species of Salicornia). A 60-day feeding trial was also
conducted on Australian lambs to assess how successful a diet incorporating
Salicornia would be. They were fed 6 different treatments; ranging from 0-100%
Salicornia “hay” incorporated into an alfalfa and/or feed concentrate diet. It was
found that Salicornia can be successfully incorporated into the diet of lambs at a
rate of up to 25%, however, the highest growth rate of lambs was achieved with
12.5% Salicornia. The lambs that were fed a 100% Salicornia diet had a net weight
18
loss, indicating that it is not suitable as a lamb fodder unless it is mixed with other
feed
(e.g.
alfalfa)
(Table
2)
(Abdal,
2009).
Information
on
current
Salicornia production and/or commercial trials in Kuwait was not available at
the time of writing.
Table 2: Feed trial on Australian lambs (Abdal, 2009)
Treatment Salicornia
in diet (%)
Crude protein
Body weight
Feed
in diet (%)
gain
consumption
(g/lamb/day)
(g/feed/day)
1
0
10.6
93.7
1046
2
0
12.2
142.7
1040
3
12.5
11.7
154.7
1228
4
25
11.3
114.7
1076
5
50
10.4
45.4
895
6
100
7
-78.5
633
Early attempts at commercial cultivation of S. bigelovii was attempted by the
Arabian Saline Water Technology Company (ASWTC) in 1993, when they
established a c.300ha project at Ras al-Zawr, on Saudi Arabia’s northeastern coast.
The ASWTC were particularly interested in the high oilseed content of S. bigelovii
(approximately 30% of the seed content). The Salicornia crop was irrigated by
giant pivot-irrigation arms that sprayed seawater pumped from the Arabian Gulf.
Although initial average output from the farm was not as high as expected, parts
of the farm surpassed the goal of 10 tonnes of forage and one tonne of seed per
hectare. Production at this site continued for several years, exporting Salicornia
nationally and to Europe, however, it soon closed due to a lack of demand at the
time (McGrath, 2010 and Clark 1994). As the need for governments and industries
to seek low-carbon energy sources that do not compete with food crops for land
and/or water resources continues to increase, the interest in halophytes as a
source of agrofuel feedstock is at an all time high (McGrath, 2010). In 2012, the
Abu Dhabi-based Masdar Institute of Science and Technology (MIST) established
the Sustainable Bioenergy Research Consortium (SBRC), comprising of Boeing,
Etihad, UOP Honeywell, General Electric, and Safran, to research sustainable
19
aviation biofuels. Their flagship project, the Integrated Seawater and Agriculture
system, couples the aquaculture of marine animals with the cultivation of
Salicornia. Currently, a 2ha pilot facility (six aquaculture ponds, eight halophyte
fields, and four mangrove swamps) is being constructed in the United Arab
Emirates. For the next phase (commercial feasibility proof of concept) they plan
to construct a 200ha demonstration facility in Abu Dhabi’s western region. This
site would have 140ha of Salicornia, 30ha of aquaculture, and 20ha of mangroves.
It is hoped that this project will show that Salicornia could be a viable source of
biofuel for aviation, with Lufthansa, KLM, and Etihad already trialling the biofuel
(Hashem, 2015 and McGrath, 2010).
2.2 Mexico
Baja California Sur, Sonora, and Baja California are the most arid states of Mexico
and are located in the northwest of the country. Baja California Sur, for example,
has an annual precipitation of 80mm and some large areas can receive no rain for
several years. Therefore, it is of considerable importance to introduce halophyte
plants as an alternative crop into the local agriculture to ensure economic and
social development and to conserve fresh water. The aridity of these regions in
combination with the availability of saline water on the states’ coastline creates
an environment ideal for halophyte crop cultivation (Troyo-Diéguez et al. 1994).
S. bigelovii occurs naturally in Mexico; the seeds of which have a potential as an
alternative source of oil and flour, with a high oil and polyunsaturated fatty acid
content (Troyo-Diéguez et al. 1994 and Glenn et al. 1991). Studies conducted by
Troyo-Diéguez et al. (1994) in a natural salt marsh at the mouth of a seasonal
stream in Baja California Sur found that S. bigelovii growth was positively
correlated to soil organic content and negatively correlated with the percentage of
sand as a component of texture and with the balance of sodium in the soil. The
negative impact of high soil sodium levels on S. bigelovii was also shown in
research conducted by Zerai et al. (2010) which found that biomass yields are
reduced by about 40% when irrigated with seawater (35ppt) in comparison to
10ppt NaCl.
OceanDesertFood, the first commercial entity of the Organisation for Agriculture
in Saline Environments (OASE) foundation (http://www.oasefoundation.eu/), has
20
been importing Mexican Salicornia (S. bigelovii) into Europe since 1999. Careful
breeding and selection has resulted in a plant that is large, sturdy, and has many
branches. It is somewhat saltier than other varieties and contains less saponins
and very little woody fibres, resulting in a better taste. OceanDesertFood cultivate
this crop outdoors on a Salicornia plantation in Baja California without chemical
pesticides and with minimum fertilisers. The crop is harvested by cutting off the
tips, enabling 3-5 harvests of the same plant. The tips have an average length of 812cm. Importantly the Mexican climate allows for production when harvesting
cannot take place in Europe (Figure 8)
(http://www.oasefoundation.eu/project_sub/163;
http://www.oasefoundation.eu/project/101).
21
Figure 8: Commercial Salicornia production in Baja California, Mexico
(Source: http://www.oasefoundation.eu/)
22
2.3 Europe
In Europe Salicornia is either wild foraged, grown outdoors, or in greenhouses for
supply, mainly, to local markets, greengrocers, restaurants etc. Therefore,
information and data on the level of production achieved and methods of
production employed are either scarce or non-existent. A brief overview of
Salicornia production in Europe is given below:
There are 7-8 Salicornia growers in the Netherlands, mainly located in the
Southwest. The “De Schorreblomme” company (the only producers in the
Schouwen-Duiveland region) have been growing Salicornia outdoors for 5 years.
Before De Schorreblomme occupied the property 6 years ago, Salicornia had been
grown at the same site for 20 years. Salicornia grows wild in the Zeeland and
Wadden Sea regions of the Netherlands. Samphire was historically foraged as a
food source in the Netherlands, however, it is now a protected plant and the
Dutch need a permit to cut Salicornia in the wild. De Schorreblomme sells to
individuals, restaurants, and local supermarkets on the island region of
Schouwen-Duiveland, with a (undisclosed) proportion designated for commercial
trade. In August 2015, De Schorreblomme built a 2000 square foot greenhouse to
expand
their
Salicornia
production
and
growing
season
(http://www.schouwsezeekraal.nl/ and Fresh Plaza, 2015).
In France, 90% of Salicornia production occurs in the Bay of Somme, where
professional “fishermen-by-foot” (a traditional method for gathering, for example,
marine plants and shellfish on foot) have been collecting Salicornia from the
region for generations. It is estimated that 400-500 tonnes is gathered per annum,
being distributed nationwide and across Europe. Fishermen-by-foot require
permits to collect Salicornia and the profession is framed by a system of comanagement of professionals and the government to prevent over exploitation of
the
resource
(Vlaams
Institute,
2014
and
http://www.ot-
cayeuxsurmer.fr/en/discover/gastronomy/salicornia). The remaining 10% of
production occurs in greenhouses, mainly on the western, Atlantic coast of France
(Lucas Heitz, Alsagarden Nursery, personal communication, 2015). Data on
France’s Salicornia production levels was unavailable at the time of writing.
23
2.4 UK
Presently, the Salicornia market in the UK is primarily based on amateur
gathering of branches from wild plants. As most natural wetlands are protected
areas where harvesting is restricted or forbidden, the market supply is limited.
The quality and quantity of wild collected Salicornia is also inconsistent and the
product is neither clean nor uniform (Envirophyte, 2006). In England, marsh
samphire (S. europaea) has been commercially harvested around the coasts of
Essex, Norfolk, and Lincolnshire for generations. According to Sanderson and
Prendergast (2002) only 5% of samphire supplied to the UK market is British, the
rest being imported from France and the Middle East. Sanderson and Prendergast
were not able to gauge the total annual harvest of samphire in England and
Scotland, however, they estimated that there are over 100 pickers in Norfolk
alone (Sanderson and Prendergast, 2002). In London approximately 50
fishmongers and specialist vegetable retailers sell samphire, though supplies tend
to be quite erratic. Jefferson’s seafoods, operating out of New Covent Garden
Market, supplies many of these London shops, sourcing their wild foraged
samphire mainly from Looe in Cornwall. They also source a lot of samphire from
France, and, out of season, from Israel (Dimond, 2007).
In 2006, an EU funded project, Envirophyte, was initiated to assess
“improvements to the cost effectiveness of marine land based aquaculture
facilities through the use of constructed wetlands with Salicornia as an
environmentally friendly biofilter and valuable by-product”. As part of this
project, Llyn aquaculture (based on the Llyn peninsula, North Wales) in
collaboration with the University of Bangor (Wales), designed simple and
effective constructed wetland biofilters to treat the discharge water from an onland pilot turbot and shrimp aquaculture system. Through the use of horticultural
polytunnels and specially designed culture beds, the project has developed
techniques for propagation and production of high performing varieties of S.
europaea over a summer season (April-October) (Figure 9). These constructed
wetlands consist of layers of gravel and sand that allow for an effective circulation
of water through the roots. During periods of low nitrogen flux, within each 24hr
flood period, the wetlands removed almost 100% of the dissolved inorganic
nitrogen in the wastewater used to irrigate the beds. Plants were trimmed every 3
24
weeks, generating a maximum of 4kg m-2 fresh weight yield per harvest
(Envirophyte, 2011, and Llyn aquaculture, 2008). According to Llyn aquaculture,
during the period of this project (2006-2009), they were the only UK producer of
samphire (non wild foraged) (Llyn aquaculture, 2008). It is not clear if this is still
the case or if they are still producing samphire on a commercial scale.
b)
a)
Figure 9: Llyn aquaculture’s constructed wetland planted with Salicornia: a) at the
beginning of the trial; and b) prior to harvest (Source: Llyn aquaculture 2008 and
Envirophyte 2006)
25
2.5 Ireland
Although information on the commercial production and sale of samphire in
Ireland is practically non-existent, personal communications (2015) with various
Irish fishmongers and restaurants would indicate that a small proportion is
sourced from wild foraging, with the majority imported from France, Holland,
Mexico, and Israel. One Cork based restaurant sources approximately 20% of its
annual biomass of samphire from wild foraging, while another used to source
their samphire from wild collection until they switched to a fruit and vegetable
wholesaler (Keelings - http://www.keelings.com/) a couple of years ago. Of all the
fishmongers contacted, none reported sourcing samphire through wild foraging in
Ireland, however, it is possible that other Irish fishmongers source samphire in
this manner. Another potential source of samphire for the Irish consumer is
small-scale locally foraged produce for sale by roadsides and at local markets
during the summer season. The level at which this occurs was not measurable.
Table 3 gives an overview of the commercial sale of samphire in Irish
fishmongers. It must be noted that these figures are subject to change, with many
retailers contacted indicating that “the prices vary greatly” and that the selling
price to the consumer was “dependent on the cost price achieved at the time”. One
restaurant that was contacted stated that they are generally charge €23/kg for
their imported samphire, however, this was the only business that quoted a cost
price this high and they did not reveal their supplier (Personal communication
with various Irish fishmongers and restaurants, 2015*).
The appearance of samphire in Irish retail outlets and restaurants seems to be
restricted to summer months, despite the availability of imported Salicornia in the
off season form the Middle East and Mexico. This would suggest that most
retailers are sourcing their Salicornia from Europe, which is seasonal in nature, or
from wild foraging in Ireland. There is no information available on whether or not
commercial production (outdoors or in greenhouses) of samphire is occurring in
Ireland, however, there is an indication that a grower may have begun
commercial production in Co. Dublin. This has not been confirmed.
*Note: For business confidentiality reasons, the business names cannot be revealed in this report.
26
Table 3: Commercial sale of samphire in Irish Fishmongers**
Cost to Business (€/kg)
5–7
Biomass purchased per annum (kg) 60 - 80
Cost to Consumer (€/kg)
8.99 – 11.95
Time period sold
summer months
Source of samphire
Imported from: Holland, France,
Mexico, Israel
Wholesaler links
http://cheflinkseafood.com/
http://www.rungismarket.com/
**Note: The information in this table is ONLY representative of those businesses contacted. Data,
source of samphire, wholesalers, etc. may vary.
2.6 Selective breeding and bacterial assisted growth of Salicornia
The main impediment to large-scale cultivation of halophytes has been the
prevalence of undesirable crop characteristics (e.g. non-uniform flowering and
ripening) in wild germplasm. In order to develop high-salinity agriculture,
including Salicornia, there is a need to improve upon these undesirable traits
through selective breeding. The wild accessions of S. bigelovii differ significantly
in plant size, biomass, seed yield, days to flowering, and days to harvesting. Hence
the wild germplasm exhibits sufficient genotypic diversity and a favourable
flowering system to support a breeding program (Zerai et al. 2010). Zerai et al.
(2010) compared S. bigelovii lines produced in two breeding programs with wild
germplasm in greenhouse trials irrigated with brackish water (10ppt NaCl). Lines
produced from wild germplasm by mass selection and hybridization in Tucson,
Arizona had a higher biomass yield than starting (wild) germplasm.
Improvements to lines have resulted in 33-44% higher seed and biomass yields
since breeding programmes on S. bigelovii began (Zerai, et al. 2010).
Inoculation of crop plants with plant-growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) is a
contemporary agricultural practise used to improve crop yields. A study by
Bashan et al. (2000) found that S. bigelovii inoculated with Azospirillum
halopraeferens, a mixture of two A. brasilense strains, a mixture of Vibrio
aestuarianus and V. proteolyticus, or a mixture of Bacillus licheniformis and
Phyllobacterium sp. significantly increased plant height and dry weight (Bashan et
al. 2000).
Selective breeding and PGPB work has not yet been conducted on S. europaea,
however, this work could greatly improve its commercial development.
27
3. Growing Salicornia europaea
3.1 Pre-germination treatment - Cold stratification
[Begin in late March/early April]*
*Based on natural conditions (Jefferies et al. 1981); no controlled light and temperature. With
controlled light and temperature there is the potential to grow Salicornia year round.
In many cases, seeds may be undergoing a period of dormancy. To ensure
successful germination, first expose the seeds to a period of cold stratification.
Stratification is the process of treating stored or collected seeds prior to sowing to
simulate natural winter conditions that a seed must endure before germination.
The method used to break the dormancy of S. europaea seeds is known as cold
stratification.
The cold stratification period should be carried out for 30 days in a dark
refrigerator (no light) at approximately 5°C. Place 25 seeds on damp 90mm (or
70mm) filter paper in a 90mm petri dish. At this stage, the filter paper should be
made damp with freshwater. Place the lid over the petri dish and seal with tape
(Figure 10). Check on the seeds daily to ensure the filter paper is damp. The filter
paper should never be saturated or dry. If fungal growth has appeared on the
seeds, a light paintbrush can be used to remove it. If a large amount of fungal
growth appears, remove with a light paintbrush and replace the old filter paper
with fresh filter paper. After 30 days, remove the petri dish(es) from the
refrigerator. On some occasions, you may already see seedling emergence at this
stage.
28
Figure 10: Marsh samphire seeds undergoing cold stratification
3.2 Early germination
[Begin in late April/early May]
Note: If you have the ability to control light and temperature, the recommended temperature and
light cycle at this stage varies from 15°-25°C days and 5°-20°C nights and 12-16h days and 8-12h
nights (Lv et al. 2012 and Keiffer et al. 1994). If you cannot control temperature, it would be
recommended that the temperature in your chosen “early germination” area does not drop below
5°C or exceed 30°C.
Following removal from the refrigerator, the next step is to introduce the seeds to
sunlight and salinity. Move the petri dishes to a location that has a full day of
exposure to sunlight (e.g. glasshouse or windowsill). Remove any fungal growth
29
with a light paintbrush and replace the filter paper if necessary. Like the previous
step, the filter paper should be kept damp, however, this time the water should be
a
mix
of
between
30:70%
to
50:50%
seawater:freshwater
solution
(approximately 0.5ml is required to keep filter paper damp). This range of
salinities was chosen as trials conducted for this manual and published literature
(Lv et al. 2012 and Aghaleh et al. 2009) have indicated that yield and survival is
negatively impacted at salinities (>400mM) approaching the strength of full
seawater (seawater has a salinity of approximately 599mM). This step takes
approximately 10-14 days and by the end most seeds should have evidence of
seedling emergence (Figure 11).
30
Figure 11: Seedling emergence after 10 days exposed to sunlight and salinity
31
3.3 Seedling development
Note (for seedling development and on-growing stages): If you have the ability to control light and
temperature, the recommended temperature and light cycle at this stage is c.25°C days and
15°-20°C nights and 15-16h days and 8-9h nights (Lv et al. 2012 and Keiffer et al. 1994).
However trials conducted on S. europaea have shown that seedlings and adult plants can grow
successfully in temperatures that peak above 40°C (aeroponic medium trial {Section 3.4.2} and
oyster hatchery trial {Section 5}).
[Begin early/mid May]
The next step involves preparing the seedlings for on-growing to adult size. To
increase the chances of successful development to adult plants, the seedlings must
first develop a robust root and shoot system. To achieve this, the seedlings need
to be transplanted to a 50:50 sand:soil mixture.
Mix commercial potting soil and horticultural sand together (50:50%) in a seed
tray (a typical seed tray would be approximately 36.5x22.8x5.3cm) (Figure 12a).
Carefully transfer the seedlings from the petri dishes into the sand:soil medium.
This should be done with a small paintbrush. Lift the seedling by gently brushing
against it with the bristles of the brush and transfer to the medium. As gently as
possible, cover the roots of the seedling with the medium, being careful to not
handle the seedlings excessively. Each seedling should be spaced approximately
2-3cm apart to limit competition for water and nutrients. Place the seed tray(s) on
a standard garden tray (a typical garden tray would be approximately
79x41x4.6cm) (Figure 12b).
32
a)
b)
Figure 12: Example of a standard: a) seed tray and b) garden tray
The seedlings are watered with a 30:50%-50:50% seawater:freshwater and
phostrogen plant feed (N:P:K 14:10:27) solution (add approximately 1/5 of a
tablespoon {c. 1ml} of phostrogen per 1L of seawater:freshwater solution). Add
this solution to the garden tray until the water is coming in contact with the
bottom of the seed trays. These garden trays should be refilled when the water
level has not been in contact with the bottom of the seed tray for a period of
approximately 24 hours. This stage lasts between 4-6 weeks and specimens will
range from approximately 3 to 70mm in size at its end (Figure 13).
33
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
Figure 13: Seedlings - a+b) transferred to seed trays sitting in garden tray
containing water treatment; c) 11 days in sand:soil; d) 26 days in sand:soil;
e) 28 days in sand:soil and f) being transferred to the aeroponics units after
36 days in sand: soil
34
3.4 On-growing stage
3.4.1 Aeroponics
To develop S. europaea seedlings/young plants to adult size, we utilised the
aeroponic method.
Aeroponics is a growth method where nutrients are intermittently or
continuously supplied in a water mist directly to the root system, often without
the use of soil or an aggregate medium; however, the addition of an organic
medium can sometimes be beneficial (Christie and Nichols, 2004, Barak et al.
1996, and Nir, 1982). Oxygen and water are quite often a limiting factor in
conventional soil and water media systems, however, as nutrients and water are
applied directly to the roots in an aeroponic system, they are in adequate supply
(Nir, 1982). From a commercial perspective it is very economical as the nutrient
solution can be re-used (the length of time that the solution can be re-used will be
dependent on the quantity of nutrients present in the solution and the biomass of
plants being grown). This re-use of water and nutrients means that aeroponics is
an ideal growth system in regions where the water quality is poor and/or supply
is scarce. This method also results in higher yields and only requires minimal
training for the grower (Nir, 1982). For example, Movahedi et al. (2012)
conducted a study comparing aeroponic and conventional soil systems for potato
minituber production. The plantlets were grown in both aeroponic and
conventional soil systems at a density of 100 plants per m-2. It was found that
growing the minitubers with an aeroponic system led to an increase in stem
length, root length, stem diameter, and yield. The end product was also of better
quality when grown in an aeroponic system (Movahedi et al. 2012). These
systems can also be run on a continuous basis, apart from some downtime for
cleaning or changing the plants (Nir, 1982). Aeroponics can be utilised for both
crop production and plant research. For example, Christie and Nichols, (2004)
from Massey University (New Zealand) have developed aeroponic systems for
growing vegetable crops (e.g. tomatoes, cucumbers, potatoes, and herbs) and
flower crops (e.g. Zantedeschia and Lisianthus) and for researching crop
nutrition, growth analysis, and the gas levels in the root zone (Christie and
Nichols, 2004).
35
A brief description of aeroponic propagators is provided below before detailing
the on-growing stage using these units.
3.4.2 Aeroponic propagators
Aeroponic propagators consist of a top tray, containing a varying number of
plastic net pots in which the seedlings/young plants are placed. Commonly
available aeroponic propagators contain 40-120 net baskets (slots) in the top
tray, however smaller practise units are available. The top tray sits on top of a
reservoir, which contains the water and nutrients. The volume of the reservoir
will depend on the size of the aeroponic propagator. For example, a 20-slot
propagator would have a capacity of approximately 20L and a 120-slot
propagator a capacity of approximately 70L. The reservoir contains 1-2 spray
assemblies (H-spray bar and pump) depending on the model size, which sprays
the roots of the growing plants (Figure 14 and 15). This provides the root system
with a constant supply of water, nutrients, and aeration, resulting in rapid and
strong growth. Aeroponic propagators are readily available at many aquaponic
stores across Ireland and online.
36
Coconut coir
Plastic
aeroponic
mesh pot
Roots
protruding
through
mesh pot
Mist Nozzle
Plant roots
Reservoir
Figure 14: Schematic of an aeroponic propagator
37
a)
c)
b)
d)
Figure 15: Example of a) 40 slot aeroponics propagator (dimensions: 60x50x40cm); b) 120
slot aeroponic propagator (dimensions: 115x64.5x46cm) c) 40 slot top tray; and d) the spraybar in the reservoir below
38
There are a number of growing medium options for use with aeroponic
propagators, ranging from inert neoprene discs which hold the seedlings in place
(Figure 16c), exposing the roots to the water without the need for an
organic medium, to coconut coir (Figure 16a); a natural fibre extracted from the
husk of coconuts.
A trial conducted from 25th July – 5th September 2014 at the School of Biological,
Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork tested the suitability
of four different media within an aeroponic propagator: 1) Coconut coir; 2) 50:50
sand:soil mixture; 3) 100% soil; and 4) Hydrocorn (clay pebble substitute for
soil). For each measurement of growth (number of nodes and branches, and
height), the coconut coir showed the best growth (see Section 9.2 for detail
on Salicornia growth measurement techniques) (Figure 17). Although the
neoprene discs were not assessed during this trial, experiments conducted in
Ireland (Section 5) showed that this medium is only suitable when the seedling
has very well developed roots. The water in the reservoir was replaced once a
week and was a solution of 30:70% seawater:freshwater and Phostrogen plant feed.
39
a)
b)
c)
Figure 16: a) Dehydrated coconut coir discs; b) hydrocorn; and c) neoprene disc
40
a)
30
Mean Height (cm)
25
20
coconut coir
15
50:50 sand:soil
hydrocorn
10
soil
5
0
Start of Trial
b)
End of Trial
12
Mean No. of Nodes
11.5
11
10.5
10
coconut coir
9.5
50:50 sand:soil
9
hydrocorn
8.5
8
soil
7.5
Date
Mean No. of Branches
c)
35
30
25
20
coconut coir
15
50:50 sand:soil
10
hydrocorn
5
soil
0
Date
Figure 17: Mean a) height; b) number of nodes; and c) number of branches
of marsh samphire plants grown in 4 different mediums
41
3.4.3 On-growing with aeroponics
[Begin early-mid June]
In light of the aeroponics medium trial conducted in the summer of 2014, coconut
coirs are the recommended medium for transplanting seedlings to the aeroponic
propagators. These coirs are available as dehydrated discs and are available in
most aquaponic stores and online.
Before transplanting begins, the coconut coirs need to be hydrated. Submerge the
coirs in 30:70% - 50:50% seawater:freshwater for approximately 20 minutes and
they will expand to their full size (Figure 18).
Figure 18: Coconut coir discs prior to hydration (right) and fully hydrated
(left)
The coconut coir material is held together by cloth netting, and when hydrated,
the top has an opening to the medium inside. Using a blunt tool (e.g. a pen), push a
hole in the middle of the opening, and push approximately ½-¾ of the way down.
Using a fine paintbrush, gently remove the seedling from the sand:soil mixture,
42
being careful to not damage any of the developed roots. Carefully lower the
seedling, roots first, down into the hole that you created in the top of the coir. If
the bottom of the coir is completely covered with the netting, rip the netting a
little and create a gap. This will allow the developing roots to expand downwards
towards the water reservoir. The final step is to place the coir with transplanted
seedling into the plastic net pot of the aeroponic unit (Figure 19). Based on results
achieved in the oyster hatchery trial (Section 5), we would recommend
transferring seedlings when they have achieved a minimum height of >2mm.
Figure 19: Coconut coirs with recently transplanted seedlings in the aeroponic
plastic net pots
3.5 Samphire flowering
As samphire is an annual (germination to production of seed in one year), unless
you are controlling light and temperature at spring/summer levels, the plants will
43
flower and produce seed in August/September. The plants tend to turn red in the
winter, towards the end of their life-cycle, an indication that flowering will occur
within days/weeks (Devlin 2015d, Deane, 2014a, and Davy et al. 2001). For the
hatchery growth trials conducted from May-September 2015 (Section 5),
flowering took place approximately 1 week after the plants started to turn red.
The red parts of the plant are saltier (Deane, 2014a) and, depending on your
preference, may be more appetising. From a visual aesthetic perspective, the fully
green samphire is often preferred (Figure 20).
However, you should aim to crop your samphire before, or at the latest, as soon as
flowering occurs. The texture and taste is negatively impacted by the flowering
and seed production process, particularly due to the development of woody stems
as the plant ages (Deane, 2014a).
44
a)
b)
Figure 20: a) Fully green samphire and b) showing red colouration
(occurs in August/September – weather dependent)
45
4. Seed sourcing
4.1 Wild source
As detailed in the introduction, Salicornia europaea can be found in most coastline
areas of Ireland and a history of wild collection exists in many areas. However,
many of the habitats where one would find marsh samphire (e.g. saltmarshes) are
often protected by “Special Area of Conservation” (SAC) status. SACs have legal
protection under the EU Habitats Directive, which outlines the need for the
conservation of best examples of natural and semi-natural habitats and species of
flora and fauna throughout the EU. Each member state is required to designate a
number of SACs to protect those habitats and species that are listed in the
annexes of the Directive. SACs in Ireland cover an area of approximately 13,500
sq. km (National Parks and Wildlife Service, 2015a). A large number of SACs
contain Salicornia spp., including Salicornia europaea (National Parks and Wildlife
Service, 2015b). An SAC is selected based on the type of habitat and/or the
presence of species listed in Annex I/II of the EU Habitats Directive. A number of
SACs in Ireland list item 1310 [Salicornia and other annuals colonising mud and
sand] as a reason for designating the area a SAC. Examples of such areas include;
Dundalk bay (Salicornia spp.), Courtmacsherry estuary (Salicornia spp.), lower
river Shannon (S. europaea), Galway bay complex (S. europaea), Blackwater river
{Cork/Waterford} (Salicornia spp.), North Dublin bay (S. europaea & S.
dolichostachya), Dunbeacon shingle (S. europaea), and Tramore dunes and
Backstrand (Salicornia spp.). Many more SACs that have Salicornia spp. present
exist in Ireland and a site synopsis of these sites, as well as all of Ireland’s SACs,
are available on the “protected sites” section of the National Parks and Wildlife’s
website (http://www.npws.ie/protected-sites) (National Parks and Wildlife
Service, 2015b). As wild collection of flora is not permitted at a SAC, we would not
recommend the wild collection of marsh samphire specimens or seed at any
location in Ireland to ensure no law has been broken and to protect the natural
flora of Ireland.
46
4.2 UK/European nursery sources
Salicornia europaea seeds can be found at a number of nurseries across Europe.
Two nurseries that have supplied seed for the trials detailed in this report are
given below.
UK source:
Nursery: Victoriana Nursery, Kent, UK.
Website: https://www.victoriananursery.co.uk/Samphire_Seed/
Retail Price: £2.50 for 50 seeds
Seed viability: >90% seedling emergence
European sources:
Nursery: Alsagarden, France.
Website: http://www.alsagarden.com/en/20-salicornia-europaea-salicornegraines.html#sthash.HtncLXDr.dpbs
Retail Price: €8.25 for 1,000 seeds
Seed viability: >95% seedling emergence
4.3 Seed saving & storage
To collect samphire seed for use the following year, allow for a selection of plants
to grow un-hindered from mid/late August. As autumn approaches the foliage
reddens and the seed is formed. When the plants brown and die back, cut off all of
the top growth before the plants collapse and lay on newspaper to dry. The seed
will then be released.
Next, store all the top growth, and anything that has fallen onto the newspaper, in
dry paper bags, shaking occasionally (e.g. 2-3 times per month). These bags
should be stored in a cool dry place.
The bulk of the seed will have naturally fallen from the plants by the next spring.
The unnecessary material (e.g. dirt, dried stems & shoots, etc.) can be winnowed
off (Victoriana Nursery Gardens, personal communication, 2015).
47
5. Irish oyster hatchery wastewater – samphire growth
trial
5.1 Aim
To assess the suitability of an oyster hatchery’s wastewater (Figure 21) as
a source of nutrients for the growth of Salicornia europaea and its
subsequent ability to remove excess nutrients from the hatchery’s wastewater.
Figure 21: Wastewater pond at an Irish oyster hatchery
48
5.2 Methods
5.2.1 Cold stratification
Approximately 700 Salicornia europaea seeds were purchased from a nursery in
Kent, England. These seeds were distributed equally amongst 28 90mm petri
dishes containing damp 90mm filter paper (i.e. 25 seeds per petri dish). The
90mm filter paper was made damp with freshwater prior to the addition of seeds.
The lids of the petri dishes were taped shut and the petri dishes were then placed
in a 5°C refrigerator on the 13th of May 2015. The seeds were checked on a daily
basis. If mould was present on the seeds, it was gently removed with a fine
paintbrush. If a large amount of mould had formed within the petri dish, the
mould was removed and the filter paper replaced. The filter paper was kept damp
throughout the 4 week cold-stratification period. It is important that the filter
paper is never saturated or dry. The filter paper required dampening
approximately every 3-4 days. The petri dishes were removed from the
refrigerator on the 13th of June 2015.
49
5.2.2 Early germination
The petri dishes were kept indoors under natural light (17h days and 7h nights)
and ambient temperature (mean 17°C) conditions. The filter paper from each
petri dish was replaced and any mould formation removed. For a period of two
weeks (until 26th of June 2015) the petri dishes were checked daily for mould and
the filter papers were kept damp with a 50:50% seawater:freshwater solution
(approximately 0.5ml is required to keep filter paper damp) (Figure 22).
Treatment groups:
On 26th June 2015, 675 seedlings (25 seeds did not successfully germinate) were
evenly distributed amongst 3 different treatment groups (9 petri dishes per
treatment, with 25 seeds per dish):
•
Treatment 1: 33.33%:66.66% saline wastewater:freshwater
•
Treatment 2: 66.66%:33.33% saline wastewater:freshwater
•
Treatment 3: 100% saline wastewater:freshwater
For one week (until 3rd July 2015) each treatment was given their respective
solution (0.5ml) at the beginning of the week and/or when the filter paper
appeared to be dry.
50
a)
b)
Figure 22: a) Petri dishes exposed to natural light conditions, ambient
temperature, and 50:50 sea:freshwater solution & b) seedling emergence
after 14 days exposed to these conditions
51
5.2.3 Seedling development
On 3rd July 2015, the seedlings from each treatment were transferred evenly
amongst 36.5x22.8x5.3cm seed trays (3 seed trays per treatment), with
approximately 2-3cm between each seedling. The three seed trays from each
treatment were placed in their own 79x41x4.6cm garden tray containing the
respective treatment solution. All treatment trays were moved to a temporary
greenhouse for this development stage (Figure 23).
The greenhouse was positioned outside, so received natural sunlight (c. 15-17h
light and 7-9h dark). The mean daytime temperature inside the greenhouse was
21.8°C (mean daily maximum temperature: 36.18°C and mean daily minimum
temperature: 13°C). (Note: the very high mean max temperature may be due to
direct sunlight hitting the thermometer and may not be an accurate account of the
air temperature surrounding the plants. If possible, do not place the thermometer
in direct sunlight. Unfortunately for this trial, this was not possible).
The seedlings were checked on a daily basis, and the respective treatment
solution added to the garden tray if required (when the water looses contact with
the base of the seed tray). Measurements (height, number of nodes and branches)
were monitored on 31st July 2015. This stage was ended after 36 days as there
were enough seedlings of suitable size for the next stage.
52
a)
b)
c)
d)
Figure 23: a+b) Seedling trays in the greenhouse; c) seedlings on day 18 of seedling development
stage; d) Seedlings on day 28 of seedling development stage
53
5.2.4 On-growing
NOTE: Due to a lack of a greenhouse onsite that was large enough to house the
three aeroponic propagators, these units had to be positioned outside. Each
propagator has a lid and therefore the seedlings were protected from the
elements. Also, the wiring was very carefully insulated. However, if possible, it
would be ideal to house these units inside a greenhouse from a safety perspective,
to have easier access to electricity, and to have more control over temperature
and possibly light.
On 8th August 2015, 120 seedlings from 3 different size brackets (small, medium,
large) were measured and transferred to individual 120 slot aeroponic
propagators (one aeroponic propagator per treatment) (Table 4) (Figure
24). Three different size classes were chosen to assess the impact of seedling
size on survivability in the propagators. The criterion for each size class was
unique to each treatment group, dependent on the level of growth achieved in
each group by this stage.
Table 4: Size range of samphire seedlings added to each aeroponic
treatment group
Treatment
Size (height – mm)
Small
Medium
Large
1
3-30
31-50
51-76
2
3-20
21-38
39-60
3
1-9
10-17
18-30
54
a)
b)
Figure 24: a) Location of aeroponics propagators and b) seedlings in aeroponic propagator at the
beginning of the on-growing stage. Note: Grey neoprene discs were replaced with coconut coir
early in the trial due to high mortalities
55
For each treatment group, each size group of seedling was divided evenly
amongst two different medium types; neoprene discs and coconut coir (i.e. each
size bracket had 20 seedlings transplanted to the neoprene discs and 20
transplanted to the coconut coir) . The positioning of each seedling within the
aeroponic propagator was completely randomised through Microsoft Excel (the
positioning of each seedling was randomised to ensure that the results obtained
were not solely influenced by the position within the unit. For example, a corner
position may get less water spray than a centre position. See Section 9.3 for excel-
randomisation methods). After 4 days, it became apparent that the neoprene discs
were not a suitable medium for the seedlings and mortalities were replaced with
seedlings from the same size class and transplanted to coconut coir.
The bottom reservoir of the aeroponic propagators contained 60L of the
following:
•
Treatment 1: 20L saline wastewater:40L freshwater
•
Treatment 2: 40L saline wastewater:20L freshwater
•
Treatment 3: 60L saline wastewater
The treatment solution in each propagator was replaced every 7 days. A sample of
the solution from each propagator was taken from when it was first added to the
units and again after 7 days, before the water was replaced. Four weeks of
samples (start & end of the week for each treatment propagator) were sent to the
water analysis laboratory at the Environmental Research Institute, University
College Cork for ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, and phosphate analysis.
The aeroponic propagators were positioned outside, so received natural sunlight
(c. 12.5-15h light and 9-11.5h dark). The average daytime temperature amongst
the three treatment propagators was 24.32°C (measured inside the lid, amongst
the plants) (mean daily maximum temperature: 42.75°C and mean daily minimum
temperature: 12.57°C. Note: the very high mean max temperature may be due to
direct sunlight hitting the thermometer and may not be an accurate account of the
56
air temperature surrounding the plants. If possible, do not place the thermometer
in direct sunlight. Unfortunately for this trial, this was not possible).
Growth parameters (height {mm}, number of nodes, and number of branches)
were measured for each seedling of each treatment on 27th August, 11th
September, and on the final day of the trial, 18th September 2015. On the 18th of
September, an overall biomass (g) for each treatment was also taken.
The lid remained on the units for the duration of the trial, only being removed
when measuring the seedlings, checking on their condition, and replacing the
water. The butterfly flap was left open during the day to allow for the circulation
of air (closed when raining) and was closed at nighttime to limit the reduction in
temperature. During periods of heavy rain, the gap between the lid and the unit
was sealed with waterproof tape to ensure rainwater did not enter the reservoir.
The trial was ended on the 18th of September 2015 as the plants had begun to
flower (see Section 3.5 for details on samphire flowering).
5.3 Results
For all aspects of growth monitored the plants grown in treatment 1
(33.33%:66.66% saline wastewater:freshwater) were the most successful, having
the largest average height, average number of branches and nodes, and the
highest overall final biomass (Figure 25 and 26) (note: average growth parameters
excluded mortalities). By the end of the trial, treatment 2 had the lowest number
of mortalities, at 11 out of 120 and treatment 3 had the highest, with 41 out of
120. Although treatment 1 had a higher level of mortality (23/120) than
treatment 2, the overall biomass of the surviving plants at the end of the trial was
higher in treatment 1.
57
Av. Height (mm)
a)
120
100
80
60
Treatment 1
40
Treatment 2
20
Treatment 3
0
08/08/15
27/08/15
11/09/15
18/09/15
Date
Av. No. of Branches
b)
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Treatment 1
Treatment 2
Treatment 3
08/08/15
27/08/15
11/09/15
18/09/15
Date
Av. No. of Nodes
c)
7
6
5
Treatment 1
4
Treatment 2
3
Treatment 3
2
08/08/15
27/08/15
11/09/15
18/09/15
Date
Weight (g)
d)
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Treatment 1
Treatment 2
Treatment 3
Figure 25: Average a) height; b) number of branches; and c) number of
nodes for and each treatment. d) Final weights for each treatment
58
a)
b)
c)
Figure 26: Samphire plants after 5 weeks in a) treatment 1; b) treatment 2;
and c) treatment 3 aeroponic propagators
59
In the majority of cases, the level of ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate in each of the
treatment waters was reduced after 1 week in the aeroponic propagators. As the
level of nutrients in the wastewater was very low to begin with, the change is only
minor. On the week beginning the 19/8/15 however, the nutrient levels in the
hatchery wastewater was a lot higher than other weeks, reflecting the variation in
levels found in the wastewater that the hatchery releases. However after one
week in the aeroponic propagators ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate had reduced to
levels that were similar to the ‘end of the week’ levels from other weeks. The level
of phosphate present after one week was more variable, being reduced after one
week in the aeroponic propagators on 50% of occasions for all treatments (Figures
27 – 30) (note: The wastewater added to the propagators on the 03/09/15
remained in the propagators for an extra week; two weeks as apposed to one
week). Refer to Section 9.4 for full data set.
60
Treatment 1
Ammonia (mg/L)
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
Start of week
1.0
End of week
0.5
0.0
12/08/15
19/08/15
27/08/15
03/09/15
Week Beginning
Treatment 2
Ammonia (mg/L)
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
Start of week
1.0
End of week
0.5
0.0
12/08/15
19/08/15
27/08/15
03/09/15
Week Beginning
Treatment 3
3.5
Ammonai (mg/L)
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
Start of week
1.0
End of week
0.5
0.0
12/08/15
19/08/15
27/08/15
03/09/15
Week Beginning
Figure 27: The change in wastewater ammonia levels at the beginning and
end of four monitored weeks
61
Treatment 1
0.06
Nitrite (mg/L)
0.05
0.04
0.03
Start of week
0.02
End of week
0.01
0.00
12/08/15
19/08/15
27/08/15
03/09/15
Week Beginning
Treatment 2
Nitrite (mg/L)
0.05
0.04
0.03
Start of week
0.02
End of week
0.01
0.00
12/08/15
19/08/15
27/08/15
03/09/15
Week Beginning
Treatment 3
0.14
Nitrite (mg/L)
0.12
0.10
0.08
0.06
Start of week
0.04
End of week
0.02
0.00
12/08/15
19/08/15
27/08/15
03/09/15
Week Beginning
Figure 28: The change in wastewater nitrite levels at the beginning and end of
four monitored weeks
62
Treatment 1
3.5
Ntrate (mg/L)
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
Start of week
1.0
End of week
0.5
0.0
12/08/15
19/08/15
27/08/15
03/09/15
Week Beginning
Treatment 2
3.0
Nitrate (mg/L)
2.5
2.0
1.5
Start of week
1.0
End of week
0.5
0.0
12/08/15
19/08/15
27/08/15
03/09/15
Week Beginning
Treatment 3
4.0
Nitrate (mg/L)
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
Start of week
1.5
End of week
1.0
0.5
0.0
12/08/15
19/08/15
27/08/15
03/09/15
Week Beginning
Figure 29: The change in wastewater nitrate levels at the beginning and end
of four monitored weeks
63
Treatment 1
Phosphate (mg/L)
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
Start of week
1.0
End of week
0.5
0.0
12/08/15
19/08/15
27/08/15
03/09/15
Week Beginning
Treatment 2
Phospahte )mg/L)
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
Start of week
1.0
End of week
0.5
0.0
12/08/15
19/08/15
27/08/15
03/09/15
Week Beginning
Treatment 3
Phosphate (mg/L)
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
Start of week
1.0
End of week
0.5
0.0
12/08/15
19/08/15
27/08/15
03/09/15
Week Beginning
Figure 30: The change in wastewater phosphate levels at the beginning and
end of four monitored weeks
64
5.4 Discussion
In light of these results, one must consider the trade-off between the volume of
wastewater that can be treated and the quality and quantity of marsh samphire
that is achievable. For instance, the samphire growing in the treatment 3 solution
(100% saline wastewater) was effective at removing excess nutrients, but
suffered poor growth and high mortalities. Samphire growing in the treatment 2
solution (66.66:33.33% saline wastewater:freshwater) had a lower overall
growth than treatment 1 (33.33:66.66% saline wastewater:freshwater), however,
the difference was not significant (p>0.05). Therefore in treatment 2 a lower
percentage of the wastewater needed to be diluted and resulted in only a very
small reduction in overall biomass. Treatment 2 also had less mortality than
treatment 1, producing a larger number of individual plants. There did not seem
to be a correlation with the size at which seedlings were transferred to the
aeroponic propagators (small, medium, and large – height) and mortality, with
seedlings from each size class for each treatment experiencing mortality. It is
likely that some of the mortalities may be due to “dry zones” that were identified
within the propagators. These “dry zones” are areas that did not get a sufficient
level of spray from the spray bar, and usually occurred at the corner areas of the
trays. The potential for “dry-zones” should be considered when purchasing
aeroponic propagators or when designing a bespoke propagator. The spray bar
should be altered or designed in such a manner that all seedlings will receive a
sufficient level of spray. Some of the seedling mortalities may have been due to
natural causes.
From the point of view of wastewater treatment and samphire growth, the ratio
of saline wastewater:freshwater of treatment 2 would be the best option for this
specific hatchery.
It is important to note that the saline wastewater is the main source of nutrients
for the samphire, the additional freshwater adding very little. As the level of
mortality seen in treatment 1 increased over the duration of the trial, this may be
an indication that as the plants grew larger and required more nutrients, the level
of nutrients in the treatment 1 solution may not have been sufficient to facilitate
the growth of all specimens. The nutrients present in the treatment 2 solution
were higher, however, the salinity is also higher, and the growth of samphire is
65
inhibited at salinities approaching full seawater levels. This may explain why the
growth was slightly lower in treatment 2 than treatment 1, yet experienced lower
mortalities. There were more nutrients present, however, the higher salinity may
have restricted growth (Lv et al. 2012 and Aghaleh et al. 2009). This theory would
also explain the growth and mortality levels seen in treatment 3. Treatment 3 had
the highest level of nutrients, however, at full salinity, there was a high level of
mortalities and poor growth in those that survived.
Each hatchery must be considered on a case-by-case basis. For example, a
different hatchery may have a much higher nutrient load in its wastewater,
subsequently impacting the levels of growth achieved at varying degrees of
dilution. However, we would recommend using hatchery/aquaculture wastewater
at a ratio of 30:60-60:30% saline wastewater:freshwater.
Unfortunately due to a delay in getting this trial started, the first step (coldstratification) took place a month later than suggested in Section 3.1 of the
manual. For the aeroponic medium trial (Section 3.4.2) conducted in the summer
of 2014 at UCC, the trial started approximately 1 month earlier than the hatchery
trial, and the average height, number of branches and nodes (of the samphire
grown in coconut coir) at the end of the trial was 26.1cm, 27cm and 11cm
respectively (Figure 31) in comparison to the best averages (treatment 1) from the
2015 hatchery trial, at 11.02cm, 12cm, and 7cm respectively. Although the 2014
trial was not conducted with wastewater and took place in a well-sheltered
greenhouse, it indicates that a greater biomass may have been achieved in the
hatchery trial with an extra month of growth or with artificial light and heat that
could extend the growth period.
As this trial was experimental, we did not have a harvesting regime in place.
However, for commercial production of samphire, we would recommend a
harvesting regime similar to the ones detailed in Section 2.1 and 2.2.
Note: The 2014 trial was preliminary and the seedlings were kept at the seedling development
stage for 10 weeks to assess the ideal length of time for this stage. It was found that after 4-6
weeks, growth of seedlings greatly slows down at this stage and should be transferred to the
aeroponics stage after this time period. If the seedlings were transferred to the aeroponic stage
after 4-6 weeks in the 2014 trial, the final growth level achieved could have been even higher.
66
Figure 31: Samphire plants at the end of the 2014 aeroponic propagator medium trial
67
6. Other halophytes with commercial potential
Note: See Section 9.5 for list of halophyte plant and seed suppliers
There are many other species of halophytes that grow in saline waters across
Ireland, and these species may have potential for commercial growth and/or the
treatment of marine aquaculture wastewaters. The following section details a few
of these species.
6.1 Sea kale (Crambe maritima)
Sea kale, of the family Brassicaceae, is a large, fleshy, perennial halophyte that is
quite rare in Ireland (Devlin, 2015a and De Vos, et al. 2010), mainly being
confined to the south coast, with
only a few locations on the east
and
west
coast
documented
(Figure 34) (Devlin 2015a and
BSBI 2015). It is mainly found at
coastal
drained
habitats
soils
with
in
well-
northwest
Europe, however, it has been
recorded
Figure 32: Sea Kale (Crambe maritima)
(Source: Devlin, 2015a)
on
geographical
cliffs
and
its
distribution
extends from the North Atlantic
to the Black Sea. It mainly grows above the high tide line on shingle and sandy
beaches (Devlin, 2015a, De Vos, 2010, and Scott and Randall, 1976). It is a wide
plant, only reaching approximately 70cm in height, which resembles a big
cabbage, with broad, succulent, waxy, wavy leaves that are green-grey in colour.
From May to July, sea kale bears a cluster of while flowers, which produce a
fragrant aroma that attract insects for pollination. It is completely hairless and on
occasion it contains a tinge of purple (Figure 32) (Devlin, 2015a). Sea kale is
very tolerant of sea spray, however, it is sensitive to excessive salinities (above
100mM NaCl) at the roots (De Vos, 2010). At the end of the growing season
(October –
68
November) the leaves and inflorescence die off, leaving only the underground
root system and tap-root during the winter (De Vos, 2010 and Scott and Randall,
1976).
The sprouts (young shoots)
that grow from the tap-root
are widely regarded as a
tasty
vegetable
consumed
in
an
when
etiolated
(whitened or pale through
lack of light) form and have
been consumed by humans in
this fashion for at least 300
years (Figure 33) (De Vos,
2010
and
Péron,
1990).
These shoots are commonly
served in a similar fashion to
asparagus,
steamed
or
blanched, with a flavour
somewhat like hazelnuts,
but with a slight bitterness.
Figure 33: Etiolated sprouts of seakale
(source: www.scrops.com)
Less commonly, the young
leaves are eaten raw or cooked (Sanyal et al. 2015).
Sea kale is rich in vitamin C (ascorbic acid), starch, sugars, mineral salts, sulphur
and iodine. It also contains sulphur heteroside, which is recognised as having anticancer properties. As well as its culinary use, it has been used to prevent viral
infection (due to its high vitamin C content), as a purifier, diuretic, antiseptic, and
antifungal. The leaves have been used for healing wounds, and the raw juice of the
seeds used to fight gastritis and gastric ulcers (Table 5) (Sanyal and Decocq, 2015,
Péron et al. 1991, and Péron 1990).
69
Table 5: Nutritional composition of raw etiolated sprouts of seakale (Péron
et al. 1991 and Péron 1990)
Components
Quantity per 100g of fresh, raw,
etiolated sprouts
Protein (g)
2.10
Caloric value (kcal)
16.9
Carbohydrates (g)
1.6
Lipids (g)
0.2
Fibre (g)
3.1
Sucrose (g)
0.1
Reducing sugars (g)
2.4
Sulphur (mg)
28
Potassium (mg)
430
Calcium (mg)
73
Sodium (mg)
3.6
Nitrate (mg)
17
Trace elements (copper, iron,
0.5, 0.6, 0.2, and 0.3
manganese, zinc) (mg)
Ascorbic acid (mg)
27
Pyridoxine (mg)
0.21
Riboflavin (mg)
0.05
Β-carotene (mg)
0.01
Thiamine (mg)
0.27
Folic Acid (mg)
0.10
Valine (mg)
0.072
Histidine (mg)
0.034
Tryptophane (mg)
0.047
Phosphates (mg)
37
Sulphates (mg)
45
Sea kale is easy to propagate in deep, rich, sandy soils, and can be grown from
root cuttings or seed that are available from specialist nurseries in the UK and
Europe (Cramb-admin, 2012)
Sea kale has been wild harvested for thousands of years across Atlantic coasts of
Europe, before being first cultivated in the 1600s. In the 1800s, it became a
popular garden vegetable in Europe and North America. The commercial
production of sea kale in Europe has all but died out, coming to an end around the
time of World War II. However, Sandy and Heather Pattullo of Eassie Farm in
Angus, Scotland, have been producing sea kale on a commercial scale for almost
30 years. Most of their sea kale is harvested from January to March and is sold at
London’s Covent and Borough markets (The List, 2015, Deane, 2014b, Temperate
Climate Permaculture, 2013, and The College for Enlightened Agriculture, 2011).
70
Figure 34: Distribution of Crambe maritima across the UK and Ireland; cream squares represent
recorded sightings from pre 1930; light orange/orange squares represent recorded sightings from
1930-2009; red squares represent recorded sightings from 2010 onwards (Source: BSBI 2015)
71
6.2 Sea aster (Tripolium pannonicum)
Sea aster is a biennial to short-lived perennial halophyte of the Asteraceae family
that grows in the upper salt marshes and coastal areas of temperate regions,
particularly northwestern Europe. In some regions, it can be found on cliff faces in
very little soil or on rocks and in inland saline areas (e.g. the Burren, Co. Clare)
(Devlin, 2015b, Ramani, 2006, and Clapham et al. 1942). It grows in a variety of
soil types, ranging from sands to clays and in peaty silts common in the marshes
of southwest Ireland (Clapham et al. 1942). Sea aster is a native species to Ireland
and can be found frequently around our coasts, however, in some areas the
distribution is localised (Figure 35 & 36) (BSBI 2015, Devlin 2015b, and The Irish
Species Register, 2015).
Sea aster can reach heights of 1m, is fleshy, and has pale, purple-blue insectpollinated
flowers
that
are
similar to daisies in appearance
and which bloom from July to
October (Figure 35). The leaves
are dark green and are linear,
with
a
prominent
midrib
(Devlin 2015b and Clapham et
al. 1942). It is very saltFigure 35: Sea Aster (Tripolium pannonicum)
leaves and flowers (Source: Devlin 2015b)
tolerant, being able to grow at
levels equivalent to two-thirds
the strength of seawater (300mM NaCl) (Ventura et al. 2013).
The leaves of sea aster are edible, having a salty taste, and due to their high
nutritional value (Table 6), they are valuable as a health food (Wagenvoort et al.
1989). Interest in producing sea aster commercially has grown in recent years
and initial studies are promising (Buhmann et al. 2015 and Ventura et al. 2013).
Ventura et al. (2013) conducted growth trials in Israel in a temperature controlled
(20°-33°C), plastic covered greenhouse. Four week old sea aster plants were
transplanted into sand-dune soil plots (96% sand, 0.8% silt, 3.1% clay, <0.1%
organic matter, pH 8, 1 x 2.25m size). There were 12 plots in total, with 4 plots
per treatment (control {0mM NaCl}, 50mM NaCl, 100mM NaCl). The salt
72
treatments and irrigation were supplied via a drip irrigation system, three times
per day. All treatments were supplemented with a commercial NPK fertiliser (5-38 & microelements; Haifa Chemicals Ltd) in the irrigation water.
It was found that the sea aster plants growing at the highest salinity treatment
produced the most biomass, however, there was no significant difference between
the control, 50mM, and 80mM NaCl treatment. The chemical composition of the
leaves exhibited higher levels of electrical conductivity, total soluble solutes, and
the antioxidant compounds ascorbic acid and polyphenols in comparison to
plants grown without any NaCl supplementation (control). The levels of
polyphenols were also significantly greater in the plants grown in 80mM NaCl in
comparison to the control (Table 6) (Ventura et al. 2013).
Table 6: Yield and leaf constituents of sea aster grown under greenhouse
plot conditions (control, 50mM NaCl, 80mM NaCl); values followed by
different letters are significantly different (p<0.05); n.d. = not determined
(Ventura et al. 2013)
Buhmann et al. (2015) conducted hydroponic (method of growing plants using
mineral nutrient solutions, in water, without soil) growth trials on 8-week old sea
aster plants in a greenhouse with temperatures of c. 20°/15°C day/night and
73
artificial lighting (12h light/dark rhythm) from October to May. A number of 35day trials were conducted to assess the impacts of nutrient addition and salinity
on the biofiltering and growth capacity of sea aster. Before these trials took place,
Buhmann et al (2015) conducted an experiment to investigate the influence of
different culture modes (sand culture, expanded clay {clay pebbles}, and
hydroponic) on the growth of sea aster (salinity of solution was 15psu). Some of
the main findings of this research were: 1) plants cultured in expanded clay and
hydroponic culture showed a higher biomass gain and uptake of nitrogen than
those cultured in sand (not significantly different); 2) the hydroponic culture
treatment displayed significantly higher uptake of phosphorus than the other two
treatments; 3) plants grown in hydroponic and expanded clay had a lower
chlorophyll (252 and 525 μg g-1) and carotenoid content (42 and 78 μg g-1) than
those grown in sand (812 and 123 μg g-1); 4) biomass gain was significantly
higher at the lowest (15psu) salt concentration; and 5) uptake of nitrogen and
phosphorus declined with increasing salt concentration (not significant). Varying
quantities of nitrate and phosphate additions to the hydroponic solutions were
assessed to determine appropriate nitrate-N and phosphate-P concentrations in
the solution for effective biofilter performance. It was found that there was little
difference seen among treatments with 10-100mg NO3-N l-1, however, the
treatment with 1mg NO3-N l-1 had significantly less biomass gain, plants took up
less nitrogen, phosphorus, chlorophyll, and carotenoid. For phosphate, gain of
biomass and uptake of nitrogen did not show any difference between treatments.
However, uptake of phosphorus and phosphorus content of plants declined
significantly with decreasing phosphate-P concentration in the solution. There
was also lower chlorophyll and carotenoid content in the treatments with 0.3-3.3
mg l-1 phosphate-P when compared to those with 5.0-16.3 mg l-1 phosphate-P in
the solution (Buhmann et al. 2015).
74
Figure 36: Distribution of Tripolium pannonicum across the UK and Ireland; cream squares
represent recorded sightings from pre 1930; light orange/orange squares represent recorded
sightings from 1930-2009; red squares represent recorded sightings from 2010 onwards (Source:
BSBI 2015)
75
6.3 Sea purslane (Atriplex portulacoides)
Sea purslane is a sprawling, perennial, greyish-green halophytic shrub of the
Chenopodiaceae family. It can be found growing in saltmarshes (usually
colonising the lower and mid marsh) and estuaries along the coasts of Europe,
North Africa, and Southwest Asia in a variety of substratum: shingle, sand, sandy
mud, silt, and clay (Devlin, 2015c, Cott et al. 2013, Neves et al. 2007, and
Chapman, 1950). It is native to Ireland and is found mainly on the east and south
coast (Devlin, 2015c and BSBI, 2015).
This species can be found on the
west coast of Ireland, however,
it
is
notably
absent
from
saltmarshes on peat substrates
(Figure 38). A study conducted
by Cott et al. (2013) found that
sea purslane is intolerant of high
soil moisture, a characteristic
Figure 37: Sea Purslane leaves (Atriplex
portulacoides) (Source: Devlin 2015c)
of peaty soils. It has a granular
appearance and texture with
branches that can spread over 100cm and can range in height from 20-50cm
(Figure 37). The flowers, which bloom from July to October, are wind-pollinated
(Devlin, 2015c, Neves, 2007, and Chapman, 1950). Sea purslane grows optimally
in 200mM NaCl water, however, it can survive salinities of 1,000mM, which is
twice the salinity of seawater (Benzarti et al. 2014). The thick and succulent greygreen ovate young leaves are edible, with a crunchy texture and natural saltiness
that can be pickled, eaten raw in salads, steamed, or boiled (PFAF Plant Database,
2012).
Neves et al. (2007) conducted field-studies of sea purslane growing in the Castro
Marim salt marsh of Southern Portugal from autumn 2001 – autumn 2002 and
found that these plants had a very strong level of growth, with a mean above
ground biomass of 598g m-2 yr-1. The maximum above ground biomass occurred
in spring, reaching 1,077g m-2 yr-1. The most commonly eaten part of sea purslane,
the leaves, provide a healthy level of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium,
and magnesium. The quantity of these nutrients in the leaves varies with the
76
season and the minimum and maximum levels of the nutrients monitored and the
season in which these levels were achieved are listed in Table 7 below (Neves et al.
2007).
Table 7: Min/max nutrient content of the edible leaves of sea purslane
Components
Quantity (mg g-1)
Nitrogen
8.9 (autumn) / 14.6 (summer)
Phosphorus
1.1 (summer) / 1.4 (spring)
Potassium
17 (summer) / 25 (autumn)
Calcium
7 (summer) / 9 (spring)
Magnesium
7 (winter) / 10 (spring)
Other studies on the health benefits of sea purslane are limited, however, a recent
study by Ksouri et al. (2011) found that a species of the same genus of sea
purslane, Atriplex halimus (Mediterranean saltbrush), was a source of flavonol
aglycones and flavonoid sulphates, both of which have antioxidant activity,
helping with glycaemic control in diabetic patients (Ksouri et al. 2011). As sea
purslane is closely realted to A. halimus, it is very likely that it also contains these
antioxidant properties.
There are no records available of commercial-scale production of sea purslane,
nevertheless, as it is a tasty, salty, and novel source of essential nutrients, there is
a potential niche market opportunity for its culture in Ireland for the national and
international market (Ksouri et al. 2011 and Neves et al. 2007).
77
Figure 38: Distribution of Atriplex portulacoides across the UK and Ireland; cream
squares represent recorded sightings from pre 1930; light orange/orange squares represent
recorded sightings from 1930-2009; red squares represent recorded sightings from 2010
onwards (Source: BSBI 2015)
78
7. Conclusion
In the most arid regions of the word the cultivation of halophytes as an
alternative to conventional crops is gaining significant popularity. Globally,
halophytes are being noted for their nutritional, culinary, oilseed, forage/
feed crop, medicinal, and wastewater treatment potential. In an Irish context,
samphire (S. europaea) is becoming increasingly popular on the menus of
restaurants and the counters of fishmongers and health-food stores across
the country. Also, as the need to reduce the potential environmental impact of
industry (e.g. onshore aquaculture) is of the utmost importance for sustainable
and environmentally responsible development, the potential for halophytes to
treat
wastewater is
wastewater
a
very promising prospect. The
trial (Section 5) showed that
oyster
hatchery
samphire exhibits successful
growth when exposed to varying levels of wastewater and
can reduce the
ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, and phosphate levels being released to the sea.
The UK and Irish Salicornia market is primarily dominated by wild
gathering, consequently, the quality and quantity
of the product is
inconsistent and the supply is limited. Also, the areas in which samphire
can be found are often designated SACs, and the picking of any plants
in these areas is forbidden.
With this
samphire is continuing to increase in
potential
for
a commercial samphire
in
mind,
popularity,
industry in
economic and environmental remediation
and
the
there
is
Ireland
fact
that
enormous
from
an
perspective. However, to fully
realise this potential there are a number of aspects of its cultivation that
still need attention.
Firstly, the main impediment to large-scale cultivation of halophytes,
including samphire, is the prevalence of undesirable crop characteristics (e.g.
non-uniform flowering and ripening) in wild germplasm. Further research into
the selective breeding of samphire for traits that are desirable for commercial
cultivation e.g. uniform flowering and ripening) would be hugely beneficial
(Section 2.6). Secondly, it must be noted that the trials conducted for this
manual were relatively small in scale, and further
work is required to
assess the larger scale aeroponic production of samphire. The propagators used
79
in the Irish trials (Section 3.4.2 & 5) (Figure 15) are ideal for small-scale
production (e.g. small shop/hobbyist/road-side sale). For large-scale production
the general design principle would be the same (Figure 14; Section 3.4.2),
however, modifications required to scale up would need to be made on a
site-specific basis. Such modifications would be dependent on a number of
factors such as scale of production planned, funding, available space and
resources, etc. Other forms of production mentioned in this manual, but
which have not yet been trialled in Ireland (e.g. constructed wetlands and
subsurface flow-through systems), should also be assessed to find the most
suitable system for Ireland. The most suitable system will be dependent on the
type of production site being implemented (this can range from a heat and
light
controlled
greenhouse
to
fully
outdoors
with
no control over
environmental conditions).
80
8. References
Abdal, M. S. (2009). Salicornia production in Kuwait. World Applied Sciences
Journal, 6(8), pp. 1033-1038.
Aghaleh, M., Niknam, V., Ebrahimzadeh, H., and Razavi, K. (2009). Salt stress
effects on growth, pigments, proteins and lipid peroxidation in Salicornia persica
and S. europaea. Biologia Plantarum, 53(2), pp. 243-248.
Austenfeld, F. (1986). Nutrient reserves of Salicornia europaea seeds. Physiologia
Plantarum, 68, pp. 446-450.
Barak, P., Smith, J.D., Krueger, A. R., and Peterson, L. A. (1996). Measurement of
short-term nutrient uptake rates in cranberry by aeroponics. Plant, Cell, and
Environment, 19(2), pp. 237-242.
Bashan, Y., Moreno, M., and Troyo, E. (2000). Growth promotion of the seawaterirrigated oilseed halophyte Salicornia bigelovii inoculated with mangrove
rhizosphere bacteria and halotolerant Azospirillum spp. Biology and Fertility of
Soils, 32, pp. 265-272.
Boestfleisch, C., Wagenseil, N. B., Buhmann, A. K., Seal, C. E., Wade, E. M., Muscolo,
A., and Papenbrock, J. (2014). Manipulating the antioxidant capacity of halophytes
to increase their cultural and economic value through saline cultivation. AoB
Plants, 6: plu046; doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plu046.
Benzarti, M., Rejeb, K. B., Messedi, D., Mna, A. B., Hessini, K., Ksontini, M., Abdelly,
C., and Debez, A. (2014). Effect of high salinity on Atriplex portulacoides: Growth,
leaf water relations and solute accumulation in relation with osmotic adjustment.
South African Journal of Botany, 95, pp. 70-77.
Botanical Society of Britain and Ireland (2015).
http://www.bsbi.org.uk/maps_and_data.html. Date Vistited: 29/08/2015.
Brown, J. J., Glenn, E. P., Fitzsimmons, K. M., and Smith, S. E. (1999). Halophytes for
the treatment of saline aquaculture effluent. Aquaculture, 175, pp. 255-268.
Buhmann, A. K., Waller, U., Wecker, B., and Papenbrock, J. (2015). Optimization of
culturing conditions and selection of species for the use of halophytes as biofilter
for nutrient-rich saline water. Agricultural Water Management, 149, pp. 102-114.
Buhmann, A., and Papenbrock, J. (2013). Biofiltering of aquaculture effluents by
halophytic plants: basic principles, current uses and future perspectives.
Environmental and Experimental Botany, 92, pp. 122-133.
81
Cardoch, L., Day, J. W., Rybczyk, J. M., and Kemp, G. P. (2000). An economic
analysis of using wetlands for treatment of shrimp processing wastewater – a case
study in Dulac, L.A. Ecological Economics, 33, pp. 93-101.Chapman, V. J. (1950).
Halimione portulaciodes. Journal of Ecology, 38 (1), pp. 214-222.
Christie, C. B., and Nichols, M. A. (2004). Aeroponics – production system and
research tool. Acta Horticulturae, 648, pp. 185-190.
Clapham, A. R., Pearsall, W. H., and Richards, P. W. (1942). Aster tripolium L.
Journal of Ecology, 30 (2), pp. 385-395.
Clark, A. (1994). Samphire – From sea to shining seed. Aramco World, 45(6).
http://archive.aramcoworld.com/issue/199406/samphirefrom.sea.to.shining.seed.htm. Date Visited: 1/12/15.
Clow, A., and Clow, N. L. (1952). The chemical revolution: A contribution to social
technology. Batchworth, London. Reprinted: Gordon and Breach, New York, 1992.
Cott, G. M., Reidy, D. T., Chapman, D. V., and Jansen, M. A. K. (2013). Waterlogging
affects the distribution of the saltmarsh plant Atriplex portulacoides (L.) Aellen.
Flora, 208, pp. 336-342.
Cramb-admin. (2012). Crambe maritima – a halophytic perennial plant.
http://crambemaritima.org/ Date Visited: 01/09/2015.
Davy, A. J., Bishop, G. F., and Costa, C. S. B. (2001). Salicornia L. (Salicornia pusilla J.
Woods, S. ramosissima J. Woods, S. europaea L., S. obscura P.W. Ball & Tutin, S.
nitens P.W. Ball & Tutin, S. fragilis P.W. Ball & Tutin and S. dolichostachya Moss).
Journal of Ecology, 89, pp. 681-707.
Deane, G. (2014a). Glasswort Galore. http://www.eattheweeds.com/salicorniabigelovii-2/. Date Visited: 12/11/15.
Deane, G. (2014b). Sea Kale. http://www.eattheweeds.com/sea-kale/. Date
Visited: 25/11/15.
Devlin, Z. (2015a). Information on Sea Kale. Wildflowers of Ireland.
http://www.wildflowersofireland.net/plant_detail.php?id_flower=520. Date
Visited: 27/08/15.
Devlin, Z. (2015b). Information on Sea Aster. Wildflowers of Ireland.
http://www.wildflowersofireland.net/plant_detail.php?id_flower=15&wildflower
=Aster,%20Sea. Date Visited: 27/08/15.
Devlin, Z. (2015c). Information on Sea-purslane. Wildflowers of Ireland.
http://www.wildflowersofireland.net/plant_detail.php?id_flower=466&wildflowe
r=Sea-purslane. Date Visited: 02/09/15.
82
Devlin, Z. (2015d). Information on Glasswort, agg, Wildflowers of Ireland.
http://www.wildflowersofireland.net/plant_detail.php?id_flower=475&wildflowe
r=Glassworts. Date Visited: 14/11/15.
De Vos, A. C., Broekman, R., Groot, M. P., and Rozema, J. (2010). Ecophysical
response of Crambe maritima to airborne and soil-borne salinity. Annals of Botany,
105, pp. 925-937.
Dimond, (2007). Samphire season. TimeOut London.
http://www.timeout.com/london/restaurants/samphire-season. Date Visited:
21/12/15.
Díaz, F. J., Benes, S. E., and Grattan, S. R. (2013). Field performance of halophytic
species under irrigation with saline drainage water in the San Joaquin Valley of
California. Agricultural Water Management, 118, pp. 59-69.
Encyclopaedia of Britannica. (2015). Leblanc process – chemical process.
http://www.britannica.com/technology/Leblanc-process.
Date
Visited:
12/08/15.
Envirophyte. (2011). Cost-effective biofilter for aquaculture wastewater.
http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/87311_en.html. Date Visited: 19/12/15.
Envirophyte. (2006). Improvement of cost effectiveness of marine land-based
aquaculture through use of constructed wetlands with Salicornia as an
environmentally friendly biofilter and valuable byproduct. Envirophyte project.
cordis.europa.eu/docs/publications/1226/122620131-19_en.doc.
European Union. (2008). Commission Directive 2008/100/EC of 28 October 2008
amending Council Directive 90/496/EEC on nutrition labelling for foodstuffs as
regards recommended daily allowances, energy conversion factors and
http://eurdefinitions.
Official Journal of the European Union.
lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:285:0009:0012:EN:PDF
Date Visited: 12/08/15.
Fan, P., Nie, L., Jiang, P., Feng, J., Lv, S., Chen, X., Bao, H., Guo, J., Tai, F., Wang, J., Jia,
W., and Li, Y. (2013). Transcriptome analysis of Salicornia europaea under saline
conditions revealed adaptive primary metabolic pathways as early events to
facilitate salt adaption. PLoS, 8(11), e80595, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080595
Fresh
Plaza.
(2015).
Salicornia
in
Dutch
greenhouses.
http://www.freshplaza.com/article/145667/Salicornia-in-Dutch-greenhouses.
Date Visited: 09/09/15.
Glenn, E. P., Brown, J., and Blumwald, E. (1998). Irrigating crops with seawater.
Scientific American, 279, pp. 56-61.
83
Glenn, E.P., O’Leary, J. W., Watson, M.C., Thompson, T.L., and Kuehl, R. O. (1991).
Salicornia bigelovii Torr.: An oilseed halophyte for seawater irrigation. Science,
New Series, 251(4997), pp. 1065-1067.
Guil, J. L., Rodriguez-Garcia, I., and Torija, E. (1997). Nutritional and toxic factors
in selected wild edible plants. Plant Foods for human nutirition, 51, pp. 99-107.
Haden, H. J. (1978). Book review of Readings in Glass History: No. 8 (Phoenix Press,
Jerusalem, ASIN). In: Technology and Culture, 19 (3), pp. 548-550.
Hashem, H. (2015). Why research won’t give up on Salicornia. MIT Technology
Review. http://technologyreview.me/en/materials/salicornia-biofuel/. Date
Visited: 15/12/15.
Jefferies, R. L., Davy, A. J., and Rudmik, T. (1981). Population biology of the salt
marsh annual Salicornia europaea agg. Journal of Ecology, 69, pp. 17-31.
Keiffer, C. H., McCarthy, B. C., and Ungar, I. A. (1994). Effect of salinity and
waterlogging on growth and survival of Salicornia europaea L., and inland
halophyte. Ohio Journal of Science, 94(3), pp. 70-73.
Khan, M. A., and Weber, D. J. (1989). Factors influencing seed germination in
Salicornia pacifica var. utahensis. American Journal of Botany, 73, pp. 1163-1167.
Ksouri, R., Ksouri, W. M., Jallali, I., Debez, A., Magné, C., Hiroko, I., and Abdelly, C.
(2011). Medicinal halophytes: potent source of health promoting biomolecules
with medicinal, nutraceuticals and food applications. Critical Reviews in
Biotechnology, DOI: 10.3109/07388551.2011.630647
Kurinsky, S. (1991). The Glassmakers: An Odyssey of the Jews, the First Three
Thousand Years. Hippocrene Books, New York, New York.
Lee, S., Kong, D. H., Yun, S. H., Lee, K. P., Franzblau, S. G., Lee, E. Y., and Chang, C. L.
(2006). Evaluation of a modified antimycobacterial susceptibility test using
Middlebrook 7H10 agar containing 2,3-diphenyl-5-thienyl-(2)-tetrazolium
chloride. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 66, pp. 548-551.
Liu, X. G., Xia, Y. G., Wang, F., Sun, M., Jin, Z. J., and Wang, G. T. (2005). Analysis of
fatty acid composition of Salicornia europaea L. seed oil. Food Science, 2, p. 42.
Llyn Aquaculture. (2008). Salicornia – Marsh Samphire. http://www.llynaquaculture.co.uk/index.php?p=111. Date visited: 21/09/15.
Lv, S., Jiang, P., Chen, X., Fan, P., Wang, X., and Li, Y. (2012). Multiple
compartmentalization of sodium conferred salt tolerance in Salicornia europaea.
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 51, pp. 47-52.
McGrath, C. (2010). Energy: Planting new seeds for the take-off. Inter Press Service
News Agency. http://www.ipsnews.net/2010/02/energy-planting-new-seeds-forthe-take-off/. Date Visited: 23/11/15.
84
Movahedi, Z., Moieni, A., and Soroushzadeh, A. (2012). Comparison of aeroponics
and conventional soil systems for potato minitubers production and evaluation of
their quality characters. Journal of Plant Physiology and Breeding, 2(2), pp. 13-21.
National Parks and Wildlife Service (2015a). Special Areas of Conservation (SAC).
http://www.npws.ie/protected-sites/sac. Date Visited: 04/11/15.
National Parks and Wildlife Service (2015b). Protected Sites in Ireland.
http://www.npws.ie/protected-sites. Date Visited: 04/11/15.
National Parks and Wildlife Service (2014). Site synopsis: Dundalk Bay SAC.
http://www.npws.ie/sites/default/files/protected-sites/synopsis/SY000455.pdf.
Visted on: 04/11/15.
National Parks and Wildlife Service (2013a). Site synopsis: Tramore Dunes and
Backstrand SAC. http://www.npws.ie/sites/default/files/protectedsites/synopsis/SY000671.pdf. Visited on: 04/11/15.
Neves, J. P., Ferreira, L. F., Simões, M. P., and Gazarini, L. C. (2007). Primary
production and nutrient content in two salt marsh species, Atriplex portulacoides
L., in Southern Portugal. Estuaries and Coasts, 30(3), pp. 459-468.
Nir, I. Growing plants in aeroponics growth system. Acta Horticulturae, 126, pp.
435-448.
Oxford Dictionary. (1989). Definition of glasswort. Oxford University Press, 1989.
Péron, J.Y., Gouget, M., and Declercq, B. (1991). Composition nutritionnelle du
crambé maritime (Crambe maritima L.). Sciences des aliments, 11, pp. 683-691.
Péron, J. Y. (1990). Seakale: A new vegetable produced as etiolated sprouts. In
Janick J., and Simon, J. E. (eds). Advances in new crops, Timber Press, Portland, OR,
pp. 419-422.
PFAF Plant Database (2012). Halimione portulacoides - (L.) Aellen.
http://www.pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Halimione+portulacoides. Date
Visited: 02/09/15.
Price, L, L. (2007). From pedestrian fare to gourmet trend: the case of Salicornia
europaea L., a traditional gathered wild sea shore vegetable. In: Moerbeek., H. H.
S., and Niehof., A. (eds.). Changing Families and their lifestyles, Vol 2, Wageningen
Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 201-211.
Ramani, B., Reeck, T., Debez, A., Stelzer, R., Huchzermeyer, B., Schmidt, A., and
Papenbrock, J. (2006). Aster tripolium L. and Sesuvium portulacastrum L.: two
halophytes, two strategies to survive in saline habitats. Plant Physiology and
Biochemistry, 44, pp. 395-408.
85
Rhee, M. H., Park, H-J., and Cho, J. Y. (2009). Salicornia herbacea: botanical,
chemical, and pharmacological review of halophyte marsh plant. Journal of
Medicinal Plants Research, 3(8), pp. 548-555.
Sanderson, H., and Prendergast, H. D. V. (2002). Commercial uses of wild and
traditionally managed plants in England and Scotland. Royal Botanic Gardens,
Kew, London, UK. www.kew.org/science/ecbot/commusesreport.pdf. Date
Visited: 03/10/15.
Sanyal, A., and Decocq, G. (2015). Biological Flora of the Bristish Isles: Crambe
maritima. Journal of Ecology, 103, pp. 769-788.
Scott, G. A., and Randall, R. E. (1976). Crambe maritima L. Journal of Ecology, 64
(3), pp. 1077-1091.
Shpigel, M., Ben-Ezra, D., Shauli, L., Sagi, M., Ventura, Y., Samocha, T., and Lee, J. J.
(2013). Constructed wetland with Salicornia as a biofilter for mariculture
effluents. Aquaculture, 412-413, pp. 52-63.
Sindilariu, P. D., Wolter, C., and Reiter, R. (2008). Constructed wetlands as a
treatment method for effluents from intensive trout farms. Aquaculture, 277, pp.
179-184.
Singh, D., Buhmann, A. K., Flowers, T. J., Seal, C. E., and Papenbrock, J. (2014).
Salicornia as a crop plant in temperate regions: selection of genetically
characterised ecotypes and optimization of their cultivation conditions. AoB
PLANTS, 6: plus071;doi:10.1093/aobpla/plu071.
Suhaj, M. (2006). Spice antioxidants isolation and their antiradical activity: a
review. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 19, pp. 531-537.
Temperate Climate Permaculture. (2013). Permaculture plants: sea kale.
http://tcpermaculture.com/site/2014/03/03/permaculture-plants-sea-kale/.
Date visited: 25/11/15.
The College for Enlightened Agriculture. (2011). The campaign for real farming –
forcing the early shoots of spring.
http://www.campaignforrealfarming.org/2012/01/forcing-the-early-shoots-ofspring-2/. Date visited: 25/11/15.
The Irish Species Register, (2015). Sea Aster (Aster tripolium). Flora of the Burren
and SE Connermara.
http://www.species.ie/burren/species.php?species_group=Burren&menuentry=s
oorten&selected=beschrijving&id=46. Visited on: 01/09/15.
The List. (2015). AH & HA Pattullo. https://food.list.co.uk/place/44585-ah-andha-pattullo/#map. Visted on: 25/11/15.
86
Troyo-Diéguez, E., Ortega-Rubio, A., Maya, Y., and León, J. L. (1994). The effect of
environmental conditions on the growth and development of the oilseed
halophyte Salicornia bigelovii Torr. in arid Baja California Sur, México. Journal of
Arid Environments, 28, pp. 207-213.
Turcios, A. E., and Papenbrock, J. (2014). Sustainable treatment of aquaculture
effluents – what can we learn from the past for the future? Sustainability, 6, pp.
836-856.
Ventura, Y., and Sagi, M. (2013). Halophyte crop cultivation: The case for
Salicornia and Sarcocornia. Environmental and experimental botany, 92, pp. 144153.
Ventura, Y., Myrzabayeva, M., Alikulov, Z., Cohen, S., Shemer, Z., and Sagi, M.
(2013). The importance of iron supply during repetitive harvesting of Aster
tripolium. Functional Plant biology, DOI: 10.1071/FP12352.
Ventura, Y., Wuddineh, W.A., Myrzabayeva, M., Alikulov, Z., Khozin-Goldberg, I.,
Shpigel, M., Samocha, T. M., and Sagi, M. (2011a). Effect of seawater concentration
on the productivity and nutritional value of annual Salicornia and perennial
Sarcocornia halophytes as leafy vegetable crops. Scientia Horticultura, 128, pp.
189-196.
Ventura, Y., Wuddineh, W. A., Shpigel, M., Samocha, T. M., Klim, B. C., Cohen, S.,
Shemer, Z., Santos, R., and Sagi, M. (2011b). Effects of day length on flowering and
yield production of Salicornia and Sarcocornia species. Scientia Horticulturae, 130,
pp. 510-516.
Vernan., B. (2013). Marsh Samphire – Salicornia europaea. Transition Town Louth.
http://transitiontownlouth.org.uk/beedocs/Samphire.pdf.
Date
Visited:
12/08/15.
Vlaams Institute. (2014). Professional fishermen by foot at the Somme Bay and
their
governance
(France).
http://www.vliz.be/wiki/Professional_fishermen_by_foot_at_the_Somme_Bay_an
d_their_governance_(France). Visited on: 14/12/15.
Wagenvoort, W. A., van de Vooren, J. G., and Brandenburg, W. A. (1989). Plant
doemestication and the development of sea starwort (Aster tripolium L.) as a new
vegetable crop. Acta Horticulturae, 242, pp. 115-122.
Webb, J.M., Qunitã, R., Papadimitriou, S., Norman, L., Rigby, M., Thomas, D.N., and
Le Vay, L. (2012). Halophyte filter beds for treatment of saline wastewater from
aquaculture. Water Research, 46, pp. 5102-5114.
Zerai, D. B., Glenn, E. P., Chatervedi, R., Zhongjin, L., Mamood, A. N., Nelson, S. G.,
and Ray, D. T. (2010). Potential for the improvement of Salicornia bigelovii
through selective breeding. Ecological Engineering, 36, pp. 730-739.
87
9. Appendices
9.1 List of Israeli exporters of Salicornia
1) Flora Export S.E. Israel Ltd (http://www.flora-sg.com/)
2) Farmers Direct Ltd (http://www.farmersdirect.co.il/index.html)
3) Agrexco (http://www.agrexco.com/)
4) Bacto Sil Ltd (http://www.bactosil.com/#In_English_)
9.2 Techniques for measuring growth
Height was measured from the base to the tip of the main stem. The number of
nodes refers to the number of nodes on the main stem. The node is the part of the
stem from which a leaf, branch, or aerial root grows. The number of branches
refers to the number of branches that have grown from the main stem. The
branches can be seen growing from the nodes on the main stem (Figure 39).
88
Branch
Height
Main stem
Node
Figure 39: Common features of samphire that are measured to assess
growth (source: Biolib.de)
89
9.3 How to use Excel to randomise a data set
Step 1: Enter =RAND() into the first cell of the column adjacent to the data you
want to randomise. This will create a random number in this cell.
Step 2: Click the corner of this cell and drag down to the cells below (as far as the
end of the adjacent column with the data set that you wish to randomise).
Step 3: Select both columns
Step 4: Select data>sort>custom sort
Step 5: In the “sort by” column, select the column of randomised numbers and
click “ok”
Websites for assistance:
http://www.extendoffice.com/documents/excel/644-excel-randomcell.html
http://www.excel-easy.com/examples/randomize-list.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8fU001P2lI
90
9.4 Ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, and phosphate levels in oyster hatchery
wastewater before and after treatment with samphire
Note: Numbers highlighted in green represent reduction in level
Table 8: Ammonia (mg/L) levels in each treatment at the beginning and end
of a 1 week* treatment period
Start of week
End of week
Date
T1
T2
T3
Date
T1
T2
T3
12/8/15 0.023
0.119
0.165
19/8/15 0.041
0.089
0.134
19/8/15 2.692
2.889
3.254
27/8/15 0.110
0.069
0.556
27/8/15 0.028
0.094
0.203
3/9/15 0.039
0.041
0.077
3/9/15 0.061
0.090
0.131
18/9/15 0.039
0.065
0.192
Table 9: Nitrite (mg/L) levels in each treatment at the beginning and end of
a 1 week* treatment period
Start of week
End of week
Date
T1
T2
T3
Date
T1
T2
T3
12/8/15 0.003
0.012
0.028
19/8/15 0.005
0.007
0.014
19/8/15 0.058
0.047
0.123
27/8/15 0.005
<0.001 0.109
27/8/15 0.002
0.008
0.028
3/9/15 0.001
0.020
0.025
3/9/15 0.004
0.011
0.016
18/9/15 0.001
0.001
0.027
Table 10: Nitrate (mg/L) levels in each treatment at the beginning
of a 1 week* treatment period
Start of week
End of week
Date
T1
T2
T3
Date
T1
T2
12/8/15 0.121
0.204
0.246
19/8/15 0.246
0.275
19/8/15 3.453
2.882
3.713
27/8/15 0.341
0.028
27/8/15 0.080
0.188
0.251
3/9/15 0.041
0.065
3/9/15 0.198
0.271
0.319
18/9/15 0.023
0.024
and end
T3
0.274
0.532
0.081
0.056
Table 11: Phosphate (mg/L) levels in each treatment at the beginning and
end of a 1 week* treatment period
Start of week
End of week
Date
T1
T2
T3
Date
T1
T2
T3
12/8/15 0.020
0.035
0.039
19/8/15 0.024
0.040
0.031
19/8/15 2.635
3.016
2.984
27/8/15 0.403
0.610
0.521
27/8/15 0.028
0.032
0.041
3/9/15 0.042
0.152
0.095
3/9/15 0.024
0.032
0.038
18/9/15 0.021
0.029
0.102
*Note: Wastewater added to the propagators on the 3/9/15 remained in the
propagators for 2 weeks, therefore the “end of week” sample was taken 2 weeks
later
91
9.5 List of halophyte plant and seed suppliers
Crambe maritima (Sea Kale):
1) Nursery: Victoriana Nursery, Kent, UK
Cost: £1.30 per plant/£3.25 for 20 seeds
Link: https://www.victoriananursery.co.uk/Seakale_Plant_Lillywhite/ (plant)
https://www.victoriananursery.co.uk/Sea_Kale_Seed_Lillywhite/ (seed)
2) Nursery: Special Plants Nursery, Wilts, UK
Cost: £2 for 10 seeds
Link: http://www.specialplants.net/shop/search/crambe_maritima/
Other nursery sources for sea kale in the UK can be found at:
https://www.rhs.org.uk/Plants/Nurseries-SearchResult?query=4710&name=%3Ci%3ECrambe%20maritima%3C/i%3E
Tripolium pannonicum (Sea Aster):
Nursery: Scrops – Serra Maris bvba, Ninove, Belgium
Cost: Seeds - contact nursery for quote (email: info@scrops.com phone: +32 54
329093)
Link: http://www.scrops.com/Seeds.htm
Atriplex portulacoides (Sea Purslane):
Nursery: Pennard Plants, East Pennard, Somerset, UK
Cost: £1.75 for approximately 600 seeds
Link: https://www.pennardplants.com/products.php?cat=234
92