Plant Syst Evol (2008) 274:243–253
DOI 10.1007/s00606-008-0032-0
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
A taxonomic and ecological analysis of two forest Chlorophytum
taxa (Anthericaceae) on Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania
Charlotte S. Bjorå Æ Andreas Hemp Æ
Gry Hoell Æ Inger Nordal
Received: 20 June 2007 / Accepted: 13 February 2008 / Published online: 16 July 2008
Ó Springer-Verlag 2008
Abstract On Kilimanjaro, Tanzania two rather different
forms of Chlorophytum comosum were observed. One form
occurred on higher altitudes, the other on lower altitudes.
Morphological, molecular and ecological studies conclude
that the two forms both are entitled to species recognition.
The high altitude form must still be referred to C. comosum
s.l., while the low altitude form is a new species and it is
described as C. rhizopendulum Bjorå & Hemp sp. nov. The
two species inhabit mutually completely exclusive habitats
on Kilimanjaro. Whereas C. comosum has a wide ecological potential, C. rhizopendulum has narrow ecological
demands as a highly adapted specialist. The two species are
easily distinguished morphologically. Molecular studies
show that C. comosum is of polyphyletic origin, and the
species complex needs revision.
Keywords Anthericaceae Chlorophytum comosum
Chlorophytum rhizopendulum Kilimanjaro Morphology
Phylogeny Species delimitation Spider plant
C. S. Bjorå (&) G. Hoell
Natural History Museum, University of Oslo,
P.O. Box 1172, Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway
e-mail: charlotte.bjora@nhm.uio.no
A. Hemp
Ecological Botanic Garden, University of Bayreuth,
Universitätsstr. 30, 95445 Bayreuth, Germany
I. Nordal
Department of Biology, University of Oslo,
P.O. Box 1066, Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway
Introduction
During several years of ecological field work by one of
the authors (AH) on Mount Kilimanjaro, two rather different forms of Chlorophytum were observed, both
keying out as C. comosum (Thunb.) Jacques according to
the flora of tropical East Africa (FTEA, Nordal et al.
1997). One form was observed in areas lower than
1,250 m, the other in areas above 1,450 m. From 2004 to
2006 more material of the two forms was collected and
analysed.
Anthericum comosum was described on material from
the Cape Province of South Africa by Thunberg (1794). It
was transferred to the genus Chlorophytum by Jacques
(1862). In the FTEA C. comosum was regarded as a
widespread, heterogeneous taxon, and several formerly
accepted taxa were reduced to synonymy. It was further
stated that ‘‘some of the mentioned forms deserve separate
taxonomic rank, but until more detailed analyses are
undertaken, it is better to treat them as geographical variants or ecotypes without formal taxonomic recognition.
More studies are greatly needed’’.
Poulsen and Nordal (2005) revised the Guineo-Congolean taxa of Chlorophytum and concluded that
C. comosum occurs in the area, with three forms, which
were given varietal rank: C. comosum var. bipindense
(Engl. & K. Krause) A.D. Poulsen & Nordal and
C. comosum var. sparsiflorum (Baker) A.D. Poulsen &
Nordal belong to the core lowland forested areas, whereas
C. comosum var. comosum occurs in transitional areas,
towards Sudano-Zambesian woodlands. Poulsen & Nordal
were, however, aware that their morphologically based
taxa might reflect parallel evolution rather than homologous evolution and stated: ‘‘If molecular analyses were to
be undertaken, the resulting [...] tree may show that our
123
244
morphologically based taxa may be polyphyletic as the
rain forest taxa may have evolved independently several
times’’.
The aim of this paper is to study representatives of the
Chlorophytum comosum complex occurring on Mount
Kilimanjaro, including morphological, molecular and
ecological analyses, and to discuss species delimitation and
speciation based on these data.
C. S. Bjorå
denaturation (96°C), 5 s annealing (50°C), and 4 min
elongation (60°C) for 25 cycles altogether, in a Perkin Elmer
9700 thermocycler. Cyclic sequencing reaction products of
rps16 intron were purified with ExoSAP-ITÒ (USB Corporation, Cleveland, OH, USA) while ITS1 products and
trnL-F spacer were purified using Princeton Separations
Centri Sep Spin Columns according to their manual. Finally
the samples were applied to a microamp reaction plate with
10 ll HiDi per sample and run on an ABI PRISM 3100
automated sequencer.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
Morphological information was extracted from Nordal
et al. (1997) and Poulsen and Nordal (2005). The sources
of plant material and voucher/accessions used in this study
are listed in Table 1, along with GenBank accession
numbers for the sequences. Nomenclature follows FTEA
(1952) and Beentje (1994).
Cytology
Root tips were pretreated on 0.02 M 8-hydroxyquinoline,
fixed in 100% acetic acid : 100% ethanol = 1:3, hydrolysed in 1 M HCl at 60°C for 12 min, washed in cold water
and stained in Feulgen solution.
DNA extraction, gene amplification, and sequencing
Total genomic DNA was extracted from herbarium specimens or silica dried leaf tissue samples using the Qiagen’s
DNeasy kit for DNA extraction following the manufacturer’s instructions. The trnL-F spacer and rps16 intron
were amplified using the primers of Taberlet et al. (1991)
and Oxelman et al. (1997), respectively. Amplification of
the ITS1 region was accomplished using modified primers
after White et al. (1990) (‘‘ITS5mod’’: GGAAGTAAAAG
TCGTAACAAGG and ‘‘ITS2mod’’: GCTACGTTCTTC
ATCGATGC). For all regions the following PCR profile
was run in a Perkin Elmer 9700 thermocycler: 94°C for
2.5 min, then 32 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 53°C for 30 s,
72°C for 50 s, followed by a final extension at 72°C for
4 min. PCR products of rps16 were not purified before
cyclic sequencing while the ITS1 products and trnL-F
spacer were purified using QIAquick PCR purification
columns (Qiagen, Valencia, California), following the
manufacturer’s protocol.
Cycle sequencing of the amplified product was conducted
with the BigDye Terminator Sequencing Kit (PE Applied
Biosystems) using 2.5 ng of primer in a 5 ll reaction
volume. Sequencing conditions were the following: 10 s
123
Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analyses
The electropherograms were inspected visually and the
sequences edited in Sequencher TM(Version 4.0.5 Ó Gene
Codes Corporation), and aligned manually using BioEdit
Sequence Alignment Editor (Version 4.0.5 Hall 1999). All
molecular characters were assessed as independent, unordered and equally weighted (Fitch parsimony, Fitch 1971).
The maximum parsimony analyses were performed using
Nona (Version 2.0 Ó P. A. Goloboff 1999/http://www.
cladistics.com) via Winclada (Nixon 1999) using the heuristic search algorithm with branch swapping and 1,000
random replications. To estimate support for internal
branches, parsimony jackknifing was performed; the
number of replications was set to 1,000, and the number of
search replications to 20 and 5,000 max trees. Species
selected for molecular analyses are mainly species that
belongs in the monophyletic x = 7 clade of Chlorophytum
(Nordal et al. 1990; Bjorå et al. unpubl. data.). Based on
earlier studies (Hoell 2005) Anthericum corymbosum Baker
was chosen as an outgroup. The aligned sequences are
available from the corresponding author.
Ecology
Ecological data were collected since 1996 along 30 transects disposed across wide changes in elevation (Hemp
2006a, b). The altitudinal range of the transects extended
from 760 m (Rau forest near Moshi) to 5,895 m (Kibo
peak). In all important vegetation types over 1,500 sampling plots (relevés) were established using the method of
Braun-Blanquet (1964). Plot size was chosen with respect
to the minimum areas of the different vegetation types.
The relevés were clustered according to floristic similarity
and the resulting plant communities are presented in percentage degree tables showing the relative frequency
(constancy) of the species (Hemp 2001). pH was measured
in the main root horizon of selected plots using a WTW
pH-meter (pH 330). Two parallel samples were taken and
measured in distilled water and a 0.01 M CaCl2 solution,
respectively.
Species
Voucher/accession no.
Locality
GPS-coordinates and altitude
GenBank accession number
rps16
trnL-F
ITS 1
Anthericum corymbosum Baker
Nordal 4601 (ETH)
Kenya, K6: Mua Hills, SW of
Nairobi
S01°270 E 37°120
EU128959
EU128939
EU128949
Chlorophytum africanum Engl.
A. Bjørnstad 2054 (O)
Tanzania, T7: Mbeya D.,
Magangwe
S07°450 E 34°120
–
EU000020
EF999986
C. andongense Baker
Nordal & Bjorå 5013 (O)
Tanzania, T3: Pare D., SW of N
Pare, near Lembeni
S03°470 2200 E37°150 0700 , 1,120 m
EU128960
EU128940
EU128950
C. blepharophyllum Schweinf.
ex Baker
Hoell & Nordal 24 (O)
Zambia, B: Lukulu road
S14°380 0800 E24°260 0900 , 1,140 m
EU128961
EU000023
EF999989
C. comosum (Thunb.) Jacques
Nordal 3803 (O)
South Africa: Cape,
Grootvatersbosch
EU128962
EU000026
EF999992
C. comosum (Thunb.) Jacques
Poulsen BI98-271 (AAU)
Uganda, U2: Budongo Forest
Reserve
N01°430 E31° 310
EU128963
EU128941
EU128951
C. comosum (Thunb.) Jacques
Nordal 3162 (O)
Zimbabwe, Cult. in Harare
EU000027
EF999993
C. comosum (Thunb.) Jacques
high alt. form
Hemp 3690 (O)
Tanzania, T2: Kilimanjaro, forest
above Old Moshi
S03°150 0700 E37°260 3000 , 2,200 m
EU128964
EU128942
EU128952
C. comosum (Thunb.) Jacques,
low alt. form
Nordal, Bjorå & Hemp 5006
(O-holo, B, EAH, NTH -iso)
Tanzania, T2: Rombo D., Holili
Area, rd. Himo to Lake Chala
S03°210 1000 E37°370 3800
EU128965
EU128943
EU128953
C. comosum (Thunb.) Jacques,
low alt. form
Bjorå & Hemp 847 (O)
Tanzania, T2: Rombo D
S03°200 4700 E37°360 3900 ,820 m
EU128966
EU280157
EU128954
C. comosum (Thunb.) Jacques,
low alt. form
Bjorå & Hemp 848 (O)
Tanzania, T2: Rombo D
S03°190 6000 E 37°380 1800 ,1,071 m
EU128967
EU280158
EU128955
C. filipendulum Baker
Poulsen 956 (O)
Uganda, U2: Masindi D. Nkuutu &
H. Dumba. Budongo Forest
Reserve.
N01°560 E 31°440 , 950 m
EU128968
EU000028
EF999994
C. filipendulum Baker
Nordal 3219 (O)
Zimbabwe, E: Chipinge D., Kiledo
lodge
S20°120 E 32°380
EU128969
EU128944
EU128956
C. floribundum Baker
Hoell & Nordal 14 (O)
Zambia, B: Sesheke
S17° 210 5300 E 24° 090 0400 , 980 m
EU128970
EU000029
EF999995
0
00
0
00
C. gallabatense Schweinf.
ex Baker
Hoell & Nordal 25 (O)
Zambia, B: Lukulu road
S14°38 08 E 24°26 09 , 1,140 m
EU128971
EU000030
EF999996
C. geophilum Peter ex Poelln.
Hoell & Nordal 26 (O)
Zambia, B: Lukulu road
S14° 310 0700 E 24°150 4300 , 1,090 m
EU128972
EU000032
EU000098
C. lancifolium Welw. ex Baker
Nordal 4576 (O)
Zambia, N: Kundabwika Falls
S09°130 0400 E29°180 1600 , 1,040 m
EU128973
EU128945
EU128957
Nordal 1033 (O)
Ethiopia: 51 km E of Nekemte
EU128974
EU000035
EU000002
Nordal & Bjorå 5011 (O)
Tanzania, T2: Moshi-Arusha Rd.,
Kwa Sadala
S03°180 1000 E 37° 12’ 3000
EU128975
EU128946
EU128958
C. macrorrhizum Poelln.
Nordal & Bjorå 4521 (O)
Malawi, N: Nyika, near Zambian
border
S10°230 0200 E33°470 2000
EU128976
EU000036
EU000003
245
123
C. macrophyllum Asch.
C. macrophyllum Asch.
A taxonomical and ecological analysis of Chlorophytum on Mount Kilimanjaro
Table 1 Species included in morphological and molecular analyses of Chlorophytum, with voucher information and GenBank sequence accession numbers indicated. Geographical divisions
following the regional African Floras are indicated after country
EU000008
EU000012
EU000041
S03°030 3700 E 37°020 3100
Tanzania, T2: Moshi-Arusha Rd.
EU000045
EU128980
EU128981
S00°310 3100 E 36°200 1900
Kenya, K3: Near Gilgil
EU280155
EU000007
EU128948
S09° 050 3400 E29°110 0000 , 1,000 m
Zambia, N: E of Mununga Bridge
EU000040
EU128978
EU128979
S14°020 0100 E 23°390 2700 , 1,060 m
Zambia, B: N of Lukulu
EU280154
EU128947
EU128977
N01°470 E 31°350
Uganda, U2: Bunyoro D, Budongo
Forest Reserve
ITS 1
Voucher/accession no.
Poulsen 975 (AAU)
Hoell & Nordal 31 (O)
Nordal & Bjorå 4567 (O)
Nordal & Bjorå 4621 (O)
Nordal & Bjorå 5012 (O)
C. occultum A.D. Poulsen &
Nordal
C. pauper Poelln.
C. pusillum Schweinf. ex Baker
C. silvaticum Dammer
C. viridescens Engl.
rps16
GPS-coordinates and altitude
The somatic chromosome number of the low altitude form
of C. comosum is 2n = 14 (Fig. 1).
Locality
Results
Species
Table 1 continued
trnL-F
C. S. Bjorå
GenBank accession number
246
123
Cytology
Morphological analyses
The rhizome of the low altitude Chlorophytum comosum is
much more prominent than that of the high altitude
C. comosum (Fig. 2c). It can be up to 1 m long and is
covered with old leaf bases. The low altitude form also has
aerial roots with chlorenchyma, which is never found in the
high altitude form. The roots of the high altitude form are
provided with distal tubers, lacking in the low altitude
form. The high altitude form often has more than one
peduncle per plant in contrast to the low altitude form. The
low altitude form typically has two flowers per node, while
the high altitude form has 3–6 flowers per node. The low
altitude form has greenish, urceolate flowers; the high
altitude form has whitish, stellate flowers (Fig. 2e). The
outer tepals are five-veined in the high altitude form and
three-veined in the low altitude form. Pseudovivipary,
otherwise common in C. comosum, is not observed in any
of the Mount Kilimanjaro plants.
Molecular analyses
The maximum parsimony analysis based on the rps16 data
set resulted in more than 25,000 most-parsimonious trees
(MPTs) of 89 steps each, with consistency index (CI) of
0.84 and retention index (RI) of 0.81. Twenty-four out of
747 characters were parsimony informative. Similar, the
analysis of the trnL-F data set resulted in 1,211 MPTs of 45
Fig. 1 Mitotic metaphase of a root tip cell in low altitude C.
comosum (Nordal, Bjorå & Hemp 5006 Holotype)
A taxonomical and ecological analysis of Chlorophytum on Mount Kilimanjaro
247
Fig. 2 Low altitude
Chlorophytum comosum. A,
habitat, C, habit, E, left flower.
High altitude C. comosum B,
habitat, D, habit, E right flower
steps each (CI = 0.97, RI = 0.96). Out of 296 characters,
eight were parsimony informative. Lastly, the analyses of
the ITS1 data set resulted in 21 MPTs of 233 steps each
(CI = 0.67, RI = 0.58). Of 296 characters, 45 were parsimony informative. The combination of the three data sets
resulted in a data matrix of 1,338 characters of which 78
were parsimony informative. The parsimony analysis
resulted in 8 MPTs of 384 steps each (CI = 0.72,
RI = 0.62).
The separate analyses of the three molecular data sets
resulted in less-resolved trees than the combined analysis.
There were no hard incongruencies in the separate analyses
compared to the combined analysis, except that in the
rps16 tree Chlorophytum macrophyllum Asch. and
C. pusillum Schweinf. ex Baker formed a clade (JK = 50),
and in the ITS1 tree C. pauper Poelln. and C. pusillum
formed a clade (JK = 77).
In the strict consensus tree of the combined analysis
(Fig. 3), C. andongense Baker and C. viridescens Engl.,
both from Tanzania, form a well-supported clade (A,
Jackknife support, JK = 100), sister to the rest of the
ingroup taxa (clade B, JK = 72). Clade B is further divided
in two subclades Ba and Bb. Subclade Ba is well-supported
(JK = 99) and contains C. africanum Engl. and C. silvaticum Dammer collected in Tanzania and Kenya,
respectively, and C. macrorrhizum Poelln. from Malawi.
The species of interest in this study are included in the next
clade Bb (JK = 82). Chlorophytum geophilum Peter ex
Poelln. (Bb i), Chlorophytum occultum A.D. Poulsen &
Nordal (Bb ii) and the high altitude C. comosum (Bb iii)
form separate branches of a larger polytomy. Otherwise
C. gallabatense Schweinf. ex Baker and C. floribundum
Baker cluster together (Bb iv, JK = 75). Likewise,
C. lancifolium Baker and C. blepharophyllum Schweinf.
123
248
Fig. 3 Strict consensus of eight
MPTs found by phylogenetic
analysis of combined plastid
trnL-F spacer, rps16 intron and
nrDNA ITS. CI = 0.72,
RI = 0.62, L = 384. Jackknife
values are shown above the
branches
C. S. Bjorå
A. corymbosum Kenya
C. adongense Tanzania
100
C. viridescens Tanzania
A
99
100
Ba
98
i
ii
iii
75
vi
72
B
82
Bb
C. macrorrhizum Malawi
C. silvaticum Kenya
C. africanum Tanzania
C. geophilum Zambia
C. occultum Uganda
high alt. C. comosum Kilimanjaro
C. gallabatense Zambia
C. floribundum Zambia
C. lancifolium Zambia
C. blepharophyllum Zambia
C. comosum Zimbabwe
C. comosum South Africa
69
v
96
vi
72
vii
54
69
97
X=7
C. filipendulum Uganda
C. macrophyllum Tanzania
C. pauper Zambia
C. macrophyllum Ethiopia
C. pusillum Zambia
C. comosum Uganda
C. filipendulum Zimbabwe
low alt. C. comosum 5006 Kilimanjaro
low alt. C. comosum 847 Kilimanjaro
98
low alt. C. comosum 848 Kilimanjaro
ex. Baker show a sister group relationship (Bb v, JK = 69).
The two C. comosum specimens collected in Zimbabwe
and South-Africa, form a clade with jacknife support of 98
(Bb vi). Within the same polytomy a larger subclade (Bb
vii, JK = 72), where C. filipendulum Baker from Uganda,
C. macrophyllum from Tanzania and C. pauper from
Zambia constitute separate branches. Chlorophytum macrophyllum from Ethiopia and C. pusillum from Zambia
form a poorly supported clade (JK = 54). Chlorophytum
comosum from Uganda clusters with C. filipendulum
from Zimbabwe (JK = 69), and finally, the low altitude
C. comosum specimens from Kilimanjaro form a wellsupported clade (JK = 97).
Ecological comparison of the low altitude
form and the high altitude form
Both Chlorophytum forms were found inside the forest. To
determine the ecological references and phytosociological
affiliation, Table 2 gives an overview (in a condensed form
showing the relative frequency of the species) of forest
types inhabited by both Chlorophytum forms on Mount
Kilimanjaro (for the determination of the altitudinal zones
see Hemp 2006a, for the description of these forest types
see Hemp 2006b). The habitats of the low altitude form are
123
situated inside riverine forests (community 1 and 2,
Table 2), where it hangs from rocks partly covering boulder flanks (Fig. 2a). These rocky habitats are situated in
(steep and narrow) gorges within the savanna on the
southern and eastern foothills of Mount Kilimanjaro
(Fig. 4) in semi-shaded conditions. This intermediate light
condition is displayed by, on the one hand, the occurrence
of more shade tolerating species such as the co-occurring
ferns Asplenium strangeanum Pic. Serm and Adiantum
incisum Forssk. and on the other hand by light demanding
ferns such as the typical savanna fern Actiniopteris radiata
Link, which has a similar distribution on Mount Kilimanjaro as the low altitude form (Hemp 2001). The low
altitude form grows vigorously in large colonies in community 1 (Table 2), which represents gallery forests with
episodically running water. These forests are lighter than
the riverine forests along larger streams with permanent
water (community 2), which have a higher and denser tree
layer.
In contrast to the low altitude form, which occurs in
only two vegetation types, the high altitude form was
found in seven (out of a total of 21 (Hemp 2006b)) forest
communities and in one of open area. These seven forest
types cover a large altitudinal and ecological range from
wet to drier forests. The plant community of open land is
A taxonomical and ecological analysis of Chlorophytum on Mount Kilimanjaro
249
Table 2 Phytosociological affiliation of the two Chlorophytum forms
at Kilimanjaro 1–9: forest communities
Table 2 continued
of secondary character representing vegetation of trampled ground on forest paths (Fig. 2b). A detailed
description of this habitat is given by Hemp (2008). Such
semi-shaded conditions on forest edges represent the main
habitat of this species, where it grows more vigorously
and in higher numbers than inside the forest. However,
123
250
C. S. Bjorå
Fig. 4 Distribution of low altitude Chlorophytum comosum (filled circle) and high altitude C. comosum (filled square), on Mount Kilimanjaro,
Tanzania
Table 3 Important habitat parameters of the two forest forms of Chlorophytum
Mean habitat parameters
Low altitude form
High altitude form
Mean
SD
n
Min
Max
Mean
SD
n
Min
Max
Altitude (m asl)
1,028
123
8
900
1,240
2,016
212
32
1,460
2,490
Annual temperature
20.7
0.6
8
21.3
19.4
15.1
1.2
32
12.4
18
Annual minimum temperature
13.2
0.7
8
13.9
11.7
6.7
1.4
32
3.6
10
Annual preciptation
981
103
8
850
1,100
1,850
405
32
1,100
2,500
pH CaCl2
7.2
0.4
4
6.5
7.6
4.6
0.9
10
3.4
6.6
pH H2O
7.5
0.4
4
6.9
7.8
5.2
0.9
10
3.9
6.8
Slope (°)
Cover tree layer (%)
80
60
5.5
8.2
6
6
70
50
85
70
21
72.4
14
7.1
32
25
0
60
50
80
Cover shrub layer (%)
53.3
11.1
6
40
70
47.7
18.8
25
20
80
Cover herb layer (%)
38
20
6
10
60
(77.1) 38
(13.1) 26.8
(7) 25
(50) 2
(95) 100
In brackets: only open habitats, in italics: only forest habitats; climatic parameters from Hemp (2006a, b)
compared to the low altitude form, which is able to
produce large, dominant colonies, the high altitude form
was never found with high individual numbers and vegetation cover (Fig. 2b, d).
123
Important ecological habitat parameters of the two
Chlorophytum forms not only differ widely in (mean)
values but also in their ranges (Table 3). The high altitude
form covered an altitudinal range of nearly 1,000 m,
A taxonomical and ecological analysis of Chlorophytum on Mount Kilimanjaro
extending from about 1,500–2,500 m (lower montane to
middle montane). In contrast, the low altitude form was
only found between 900 and 1,240 m (colline to submontane). Consequently, parameters related to altitude (e.g.
precipitation and temperature) showed respective differences. The low altitude form grows on neutral to alkaline
soils (pH 7.2 and 7.5, in H2O and CaCl2, respectively)
whereas the high altitude form is mainly found on acidic
soils (mean pH 4.6 and 5.2). However, the light regimes of
the habitats are similar, although the high altitude form is
only found under a denser tree canopy (Table 3). Therefore, both species can be regarded as forest plants,
notwithstanding the fact that the low altitude form thrives
on rocks (within forests) and the high altitude form partly
on semi-shaded forest tracks or forest edges.
Discussion
Morphological analyses
The two forms of C. comosum occurring on Mount Kilimanjaro fall into two distinct morphological types which
are easy to distinguish. The high altitude form falls within
the C. comosum complex according to FTEA (Nordal et al.
1997), while the low altitude form has some distinct
characters that does not fit in the present understanding of
C. comosum and needs taxonomic recognition.
251
both morphological and molecular are needed to untwine
this complex.
The basic chromosome number, x = 7, represents a
synapomorphy for clade Bb, where the two Mount Kilimanjaro forms occur. In contrast, x = 8 represents the
plesiomorphic character state of the genus (Nordal et al.
1990). Ba, the sister clade of Bb, includes the species formerly referred to the genus Dasystachys Baker, until Marais
and Reilly (1978) transferred them to Chlorophytum. The
two species C. adongense and C. viridescence Engl. form a
sister clade to clade B, are both characterised by uniquely
having branched inflorescences and thick, spongy roots.
Ecological analyses
The two forms of Chlorophytum comosum occurring at
Mount Kilimanjaro inhabit completely exclusive habitats
(Fig. 4). Whereas the high altitude form has a wide ecological potential, the low altitude form has narrow
ecological demands as a highly adapted specialist. The low
altitude form is rare on Mount Kilimanjaro, although it is
locally abundant. Only eight localities are known up to
now in this area (Fig. 4). This is due to its very specific
habitat demands and the natural and anthropogenic rarity of
the preferred habitat type. In contrast the high altitude form
is widespread, inhabiting nearly the whole forest belt
between 1,500 and 2,500 m.
Taxonomical implications
Molecular analyses
The two forms of C. comosum do not form a monophyletic
group in the strict consensus tree of the combined analysis
(Fig. 3). Representatives of the three subpopulations of the
low altitude form found on Mount Kilimanjaro form a well
supported clade (subclade Bb vii), while the high altitude
form is unresolved within subclade Bb.
The molecular analysis indicates that C. macrophyllum,
C. filipendulum and C. comosum have a polyphyletic origin
and need to be investigated further. This is in accordance
with Nordal et al. (1997) who stated that ‘‘The C. comosum
complex is furthermore not very well delimited from
C. filipendulum.’’ They reduced 23 species to synonymy
under C. comosum, but indicating that some of them might
deserve separate taxonomic rank. The low altitude form
can easily be distinguished from C. comosum s.l. based on
morphology, this form can therefore be given taxonomic
recognition. The high altitude C. comosum from Mount
Kilimanjaro and C. comosum from Uganda are not clustering with C. comosum from South Africa, but as the type
of C. comosum is South African, the name ‘comosum’ will
probably belong in clade Bb vi. These taxa are, however,
not easy to delimitate morphologically and more studies,
Based on these findings, we have no doubt that the low
altitude form deserves recognition at the species level. The
high altitude form must, with the morphological knowledge
we have today, still be referred to C. comosum s.l.
However, as the molecular analysis show, the species
delimitation of C. comosum is problematic.
Nordal et al. (1997) in FTEA might have included the
rock-inhabiting low altitude form of Mount Kilimanjaro in
their concept of C. comosum in a wide sense. Therefore, it
is necessary to check their synonyms relating to plants
from Mount Kilimanjaro and the Eastern Arc Mountains to
find out whether this taxon might already have an appropriate name at species level. Such taxa/names are discussed
below, in order of priority.
Chlorophytum glaucidulum Engl. ex Poelln. was
described by Poellnitz (1946) based on material from W
Usambara (Engler 1220, B). The plant has roots with
swollen tubers and fits with C. comosum, as defined here.
Chlorophytum inopinum Poelln. (Poellnitz 1946) was
described on material from Eastern Usambara (Peter
23673, B). It was reduced to C. comosum in FTEA (Nordal
et al. 1997), with a note that the form tends to approach
C. gallabatense Schweinf. ex Baker. It has an erect
123
252
C. S. Bjorå
Fig. 5 Chlorophytum
rhizopendulum Bjorå & Hemp.
a Habit, b Detail of flower, c
Capsule. Drawing by A. Hemp.
Drawing based on Nordal, Bjorå
& Hemp 5006 (Holotype)
inflorescence and is totally different from the rock-inhabiting form described here.
Chlorophytum rugosum Poelln. (Poellnitz 1946) was
described on material from N Pare at 1,700 m (Peter
14334, B). This form has thin roots, probably with tubers
and a short erect inflorescence, and appears to be a
depauperate form of C. comosum.
Chlorophytum usambarense Engl. ex Poelln. was
described by Poellnitz (1946) on material from E Usambara (Scheffler 237, B). It has a short rhizome and
corresponds to C. comosum as defined here.
Accordingly, as there are no older names available for
the low altitude rock-inhabiting plants, a new species name
and description is required.
Chlorophytum rhizopendulum Bjorå & Hemp nov.sp.
Simile C. comoso (Thunb.) Jacques sed rhizomate supra
solum crescente robustiore et longiore usque ad 1 m; radicibus crassis sine tuberibus; pedicellis brevioribus usque
ad 4 mm; floribus viridibus; tepalis exterioribus cum
quinque nervis (non cum tribus nervis). Nascitur in faucibus, rhizomatibus de rupe dependentibus, multis locis
societates amplas producens.
Tanzania T2, Rombo Distr., near road from Himo to
Lake Chala, alt. 1,000 m, UTM Zone 37: 3/47/500 E, 96/
29/300 S, on bare rock in narrow ravine. 23.6.04. Nordal,
Bjorå and Hemp 5006 (=Hemp 3296) (O, holotype; B,
EAH, NHT, isotypes).
Prominent rhizomes up to 1 m long and about 1.5 cm in
diameter, covered with old leaf bases, whitish when cut,
turning red-brown when oxidised; thick whitish, tomentose
aerial roots with chlorenchyma (Fig. 5). Leaves rosulate,
sheathing, lacking petiole, whitish in lower parts, glossy
green above, duller, more greyish below with distinct
midrib, 30–42 cm long and 3.4–4.2 cm wide. Inflorescence
123
lax, with sterile bracts in lower part, up to 100 cm long,
nodes widely scattered with mostly two flowers per node;
bracts supporting flowers about 4 mm long and 2 mm
wide. Pedicels 4 mm long, with a joint in the upper half.
Flowers green, urceolate, petals about 8 mm long, outer
3 mm wide with five nerves, inner 2 mm wide with three
nerves. Filaments scabrid, slightly fusiform, 5 mm long.
Anthers 1.5 mm long. Style straight, slightly longer than
the stamens. Capsules trigonous, 7–8 mm long, about
5 mm wide, with truncate base and emarginate apex. Seeds
irregularly folded. Pseudovivipary not observed.
IUCN red list category
Chlorophytum rhizopendulum is known from eight localities in the Mount Kilimanjaro area. The type locality hosts
approximately 1,000 mature individuals. The second largest population consists of approximately 500 individuals,
four subpopulations contain less than 100 mature individuals each and in the two last subpopulations there are fewer
than ten mature individuals. The area of occupancy (IUCN
2001) is estimated to be far less than 500 km2, severely
fragmented and we have been observing a continuing
decline in the subpopulations due to habitat destruction.
C. rhizopendulum has very specific habitat demands, and is
dependent on shade and rocky surfaces. The areas where
the species is found have no governmental protection and
with heavy logging, the quality of the habitat will be
reduced considerably. Based on criteria B2a, b(iii) + E
(IUCN 2001), C. rhizopendulum must be regarded as an
Endangered Species (EN).
Acknowledgments We gratefully acknowledge the financial support granted by the Norwegian Research Council (CSB, Project
151050) NUFU (IN, PRO39/02) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (AH). Thanks to Anne K. Brysting for comments on earlier
drafts of the MS.
A taxonomical and ecological analysis of Chlorophytum on Mount Kilimanjaro
References
Beentje HJ (1994) Kenya trees, shrubs and lianas. National Museums
of Kenya, Nairobi
Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie. Springer, Wien
Fitch WM (1971) Towards defining the course of evolution: minimum
change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 20:406–416
FTEA (1952) Flora of tropical East Africa. Royal Botanic Garden,
Kew
Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT.
Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98
Hemp A (2001) Ecology of the pteridophytes on the southern slopes
of Mt. Kilimanjaro. Part II: habitat selection. Pl Biol 3:493–523
Hemp A (2006a) Continuum or zonation? Altitudinal gradients in the
forest vegetation of Mt. Kilimanjaro. Pl Ecol 184:27–42
Hemp A (2006b) Vegetation of Kilimanjaro: hidden endemics and
missing bamboo. Afr J Ecol. 44:305–328
Hemp A (2008) Introduced plants on Kilimanjaro: tourism and its
impact. Pl Ecol (in press)
Hoell G (2005) The genera Anthericum and Chlorophytum (Anthericaceae), evolution and delimitation. Cand. Scient. Thesis,
University of Oslo
IUCN (2001) Version 3.1 http://www.redlist.org/info/categories_
criteria2001
Jacques HA (1862) Notes sur des plantes nouvelles, rares ou peu
connues. J Soc Imp Centr Hort 8:345
253
Marais W, Reilly J (1978) Chlorophytum and its related genera
(Liliaceae). Kew Bull 32:653–663
Nixon KC (1999) Winclada (BETA) Published by the author, New
York
Nordal I, Eriksen TE, Fosby M (1990) Studies on the generic
delimitation of Anthericaceae. Mitt Inst Allg Bot Hamburg
23b:535–559
Nordal I, Kativu S, Poulsen AD (1997) Anthericaceae. Flora of
tropical East Africa. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam
Oxelman B, Lidén M, Berglund D (1997) Chloroplast rps16 intron
phylogeny of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae). Pl Syst Evol
206:393–410
Poellnitz K (1946) Die Chlorophytum-Arten Tanganyikas. Port Acta
Biol B 1:255–383
Poulsen AD, Nordal I (2005) A phenetic analysis and revision of
Guineo–Congolean rain forest taxa of Chlorophytum (Anthericaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 148:1–20
Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J (1991) Universal primers for
amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA.
Pl Molec Biol 17:1105–1109
Thunberg (1794) Prodromus plantarum capensium. Uppsala
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct
sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics.
In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR
protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press,
San Diego, pp 315–322
123