Skip to content
Login
WIKTROP - Weed Identification and Knowledge in the Tropical and Mediterranean areas
WIKTROP - Weed Identification and Knowledge in the Tropical and Mediterranean areas
SpeciesMapsDocumentsIDAO

Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.King & H.Rob.

Accepted
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
/82bbbe99-b6bf-4d26-bb64-4437e6d0ce1c/780.jpg
/7e810e22-5fcc-4091-8f5e-1835fcb79a32/701.JPG
/5ce6666a-d6ec-4447-b4d3-6ee0618f888c/588.jpg
/5ce6666a-d6ec-4447-b4d3-6ee0618f888c/43.jpg
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.
🗒 Synonyms
synonymAlfredia squarrosa Kostel.
synonymChromolaena barranquillensis (Hieron.) R.King & H.Rob.
synonymChromolaena odorata f. odorata
synonymChromolaena odorata f. squarrosa S.Garg
synonymChrysocoma maculata Vell.
synonymChrysocoma maculata Vell. Conc.
synonymChrysocoma volubilis Vell. Conc.
synonymEupatorium affine Hook. & Arn.
synonymEupatorium affine Hook. & Arn. [Illegitimate]
synonymEupatorium atriplicifolium Vahl
synonymEupatorium atriplicifolium Vahl [Illegitimate]
synonymEupatorium brachiatum Sw. ex Wikstr.
synonymEupatorium clematitis DC.
synonymEupatorium conyzoides f. angustiflorum Cuatrec.
synonymEupatorium conyzoides f. glabratum Hassl.
synonymEupatorium conyzoides Mill.
synonymEupatorium conyzoides Vahl
synonymEupatorium conyzoides Vahl [Illegitimate]
synonymEupatorium conyzoides var. angustiflorum Cuatrec.
synonymEupatorium conyzoides var. floribunda (Kunth) Hieron.
synonymEupatorium conyzoides var. heterolepis Griseb.
synonymEupatorium conyzoides var. incanum Baker
synonymEupatorium conyzoides var. paucidentatum Baker
synonymEupatorium conyzoides var. pauciflorum Baker
synonymEupatorium conyzoides var. scaberulum Hassl.
synonymEupatorium conyzoides var. tambillense Hieron.
synonymEupatorium dichotomum Sch.Bip.
synonymEupatorium divergens Less.
synonymEupatorium floribundum Kunth
synonymEupatorium graciliflorum DC.
synonymEupatorium incisum Rich.
synonymEupatorium klattii Millsp.
synonymEupatorium margaritense var. glabrescens Steetz
synonymEupatorium margaritense var. heterolepis Griseb.
synonymEupatorium margaritense var. phyllocephalum Sch.Bip. ex Baker
synonymEupatorium odoratum f. scandens Kuntze
synonymEupatorium odoratum f. squarrosum J. Kost.
synonymEupatorium odoratum L.
synonymEupatorium odoratum var. brachiatum (Sw. ex Wikstr.) DC.
synonymEupatorium odoratum var. cubense DC.
synonymEupatorium odoratum var. mallotophyllum B.L.Rob.
synonymEupatorium odoratum var. pauciflorum (Baker) Hieron.
synonymEupatorium sabeanum Buckley
synonymEupatorium stigmatosum Meyen & Walp.
synonymOsmia atriplicifolia (Vahl) Sch.Bip.
synonymOsmia clematitis (DC.) Sch.Bip.
synonymOsmia conyzoides (Vahl) Small
synonymOsmia conyzoides (Vahl) Small [Illegitimate]
synonymOsmia divergens (Less.) Sch.Bip.
synonymOsmia floribunda (Kunth) Sch.Bip.
synonymOsmia graciliflora (DC.) Sch.Bip.
synonymOsmia graciliflorum (DC.) Sch.Bip.
synonymOsmia odorata (L.) Sch.Bip.
🗒 Common Names
Chinese
  • 飞机草, Fei ji cao, fēi jī cǎo
Creoles and pidgins; French-based
  • Fleurit-Noël, Langue à chat, Guérit tout, Guérit-trop-vite (Guyane)
  • Fléri Nwèl, Lang (a) chat, Géri tout, Guéri two vit (Antilles)
English
  • Siam weed, Archangel, Awolowo weed
  • Armstrong’s weed, Bitter bush, Christmas bush, Christmas rose, Chromolaena, Eupatorium, Jack in the bush, Paraffinbush, Siam weed,Triffid weed,Turpentine weed, Paraffin weed
French
  • Herbe du Laos, Eupatoire odorante
  • Bokassa (Centrafrique)
  • Sekou Touré (Afrique de l'Ouest)
Maori
  • Kesengesil, Masigsig (Mariannes islands, Guam)
Other
  • Paraffienbos (Afrikaans, South Africa)
  • Usandanezwe (isiZulu, South Africa)
Philippine languages
  • Hagonoy, Agonoi, Huluhagonoi
Spanish; Castilian
  • Paleca (Panama)
  • Cuarina de monte, Eupatorio oloroso
  • Niquibey (Dominique)
  • Crucito, Rey del todo (Honduras)
  • Chismuyo (Mexico)
📚 Overview
Overview
Brief
Code

EUPOD

Growth form

shrub
 
Biological cycle

perennial

Habitat

terrestrial

Wiktrop
AttributionsWiktrop
Contributors
Lovena Nowbut
StatusUNDER_CREATION
LicensesCC_BY
References
    Diagnostic Keys
    Description

    Global description
     
    Chromolaena  odorata is a bushy plant with woody stem, spread and highly branched, which constitute dense mass. It can reach up to 7 m high. It is entirely covered with a short pubescence. The simple, opposite leaves are characterised by their sub-rhombic shape and their venation, 3 veins emerging from the base or almost. As indicated by the name of this species, its leaves give off a strong odor when crushed. The terminal diffuse inflorescence consists of small and narrow cylindrical capitulum with white to pale blue florets. It is a perennial plant that reproduces by seeds. In cultures, it behaves as an annual.
     
    General habit
     
    Herbaceous or bushy plant, erect, which can be climbing, 2 to 7 m high, forming dense mass. It measures 0.30 to 1.50 m when it behaves as annual in cultures.
     
    Underground system
     
    The root is a deep and solid taproot, highly branched.
     
    Stem
     
    The stem is cylindrical, yellowish in color; it is finely serrated and covered with a short pubescence, especially the young parts. It has opposite decussate horizontal branches that spread in all directions. It is of grass type when young and becomes sub-lignified when mature.
     
    Leaf
     
    The leaves are simple, opposite, decussate, carried by a petiole of 1 to 3 cm. They give off a strong odor when crushed. The leaf blade is oval-triangular to rhombic, wider near the base, 3 to 12 cm long, 2 to 7 cm wide. The base is abruptly narrowed, with an acuminate apex, serrated margin, sometimes entire. Venation trinervate at the prominent base, with lateral ribs going above of the base, is characteristic. The leaves have on the two sides a short hispid pubescence, more provided on the underside. Yellow glandular points are preset on the underside.
     
    Inflorescence
     
    The inflorescence consists of capitilum grouped by 20 to 35 in axillary and terminal stalked corymb, which together form a horizontally spread inflorescence. The capitulum are narrowly cylindrical, 1 cm long and 3 mm in diameter. The involucre consists of oblanceolate, obtuse bracts, pubescent at the apex, yellow-greenish, arranged in row of 5 to 6.
     
    Flower
     
    The florets, all tubular and hermaphrodites, are pale purple, pale blue or whitish. They exceed the involucre. The corolla is a tube of 10 mm long which ends with five lobes. This tube exceed two divergent stigmas. 5 stamens with anthers fused together are included in the tube.
     
    Fruit
     
    The fruit is a narrow and elongated achene, 5 mm long, with 4 to 5 longitudinal angles with a line of white, short and rigid hairs. It is brown or black. It is surmounted by a pappus consisting of a single row of free whitish bristles, weakly barbed, 5 mm long.

    Wiktrop
    AttributionsWiktrop
    Contributors
    StatusUNDER_CREATION
    LicensesCC_BY_SA
    References
      No Data
      📚 Natural History
      Life Cycle

      Life cycle

      Perenial
      Perenial

      China: Chromolaena odorata flowers and fruits from April to December.
      Madagascar
      : C. odorata flowers and fruits from June to September.
      West Indies: Chromolaena odorata flowers and fruits from December to February.

       

      Wiktrop
      AttributionsWiktrop
      Contributors
      StatusUNDER_CREATION
      LicensesCC_BY
      References
        Cyclicity

        Chromolaena odorata is a perennial plant. In cultures where the soil is tilled, it behaves as an annual plant. Reproduction is by seed, disseminated by wind and animals and vegetatively from cut basal shoots.

         

        Wiktrop
        AttributionsWiktrop
        Contributors
        StatusUNDER_CREATION
        LicensesCC_BY
        References
          Reproduction

          The seed production of Chromolaena odorata is very important and high densities can be reached (more than 2000 seeds per m2). An important intra-specific competition takes place during the first months of development (Yadav & Tripathi, 1982).
          The seeds mature in February-March for the areas composing its range. The duration of production is about two months and corresponds to the period of maturation of all the seeds of the plant. The seed does not have albumen, its longevity is consequently reduced. It is estimated at approximately 26 months (Mouloungou & Sigrist, 1993).
          In general, the seeds are adapted to germination in a secondary environment, but a great variability is observed according to the populations studied (Edwards, 1974). Dormancy and shade are necessary for germination. Conditions to promote germination are temperatures above 20°C and humidity. Light quality also plays a role in germination. Green and far infrared light reduce the germination rate, while red or white light has a positive effect (Erasmus & Van Staden, 1986).
          Vegetative reproduction may occur in C. odorata during the development period. It is possible that fallen branches develop adventitious roots (CAB-CPC, 2004).
          C. odorata has a high regenerative capacity. Numerous stump sprouts can be observed after disturbance of the plant either by fire or by cutting. In particular, fire induces a strong response of the plant in terms of renewal by stump sprouts (Mouloungou & Sigrist, 1993).

          Molard G., Le Bourgeois T., Camou R., Ehret P.
          AttributionsMolard G., Le Bourgeois T., Camou R., Ehret P.
          Contributors
          StatusUNDER_CREATION
          LicensesCC_BY
          References
            Dispersal

            The dispersion of the fruits of Chromolaena odorata is mainly anemochore. But it can also be exozoochorous or anthropochorous as the fruits can easily stick to furs, feathers or clothes and vehicles and agricultural equipment. These two types of dispersal ensure an efficient propagation of the seeds of C. odorata over short and long distances (Mouloungou & Sigrist, 1993).
            The spread of the plant is relatively rapid. For example, in one field in Ghana, two years were sufficient for the plant to colonize the entire crop from small foci of a few individuals (Mouloungou & Sigrist, 1993).
            The movement of agricultural machinery or vehicles in colonized areas where seeds are present on the ground may favour the dissemination of the plant.
            In the case of the presence of C. odorata seeds in seed lots intended for planting, sowing will directly promote the spread of the plant.

            Molard G., Le Bourgeois T., Camou R., Ehret P.
            AttributionsMolard G., Le Bourgeois T., Camou R., Ehret P.
            Contributors
            StatusUNDER_CREATION
            LicensesCC_BY
            References
              Growth

              Chromolaena odorata cannot grow in areas where fires are annual, such as the African savannahs. However, if the fires are irregular, the plant can be favored and form a dense thicket that will limit the sincendies in wet areas (plant not very flammable, contrary to grasses, it keeps a high water content if the dry season is not too long). In a markedly dry season, this bush may burn, but the underground organs will ensure rapid regrowth of the vegetative organs. Fire favors the development of stump sprouts (Mouloungou & Sigrist, 1993).
              The large quantity of seeds produced and the variability of dormancy contribute to survival during difficult periods (fire, effective weeding, canopy closure) although the viability of seeds in the soil is not very long.

              Molard G., Le Bourgeois T., Camou R., Ehret P.
              AttributionsMolard G., Le Bourgeois T., Camou R., Ehret P.
              Contributors
              StatusUNDER_CREATION
              LicensesCC_BY
              References
                Morphology

                Type of prefoliation

                Leaf ratio medium
                Leaf ratio medium

                Equality of opposite leaves

                Opposite leaves equal
                Opposite leaves equal

                Latex

                Without latex
                Without latex

                Root type

                Taproot
                Taproot

                Stipule type

                No stipule
                No stipule

                Achene type

                Achene with plumose pappus
                Achene with plumose pappus

                Lamina margin

                largely dentate
                largely dentate

                Lamina apex

                attenuate
                attenuate
                acuminate
                acuminate

                Lamina Veination

                Palmate
                Palmate
                3 opposite at the basis
                3 opposite at the basis

                Flower color

                Pinkish
                Pinkish
                White
                White

                Inflorescence type

                Capitule with tubular flowers
                Capitule with tubular flowers

                Stem pilosity

                Dense hairy
                Dense hairy

                Life form

                Broadleaf plant
                Broadleaf plant
                Shrub
                Shrub
                Look Alikes
                Chromolaena odorata can be confused with other bushy shrubs with flower heads of whitish flower heads such as Microglossa pyrifolia (Lam.) Kuntze and Ageratina adenophora (Spreng.) King & H.Rob.
                The distinction of these three species can be made by the following characters:

                Stem hairyness Phylotaxy Leaf blade Hairyness of the lower face Involucral bracts Bracts Florets Achen Pappus
                Microglossa pyrifolia tuberculate hairs alternate oval, green tuberculate hairs 4-5 rows persistant numerous ligulate and tubulate 1 mm bristles white or reddish on 2 - 3 rows
                Chromolaena odorata short hairs opposit triangular avec 1 -2 big teeth at the base, yellowish green scabrous 5-6 rows caducous 20 florets all tubulate 4-5 mm bristles white on 1 row
                Ageratina adenophora white or ferruginous hairs glandulous opposit elliptical to triangular, green with red petiol glabrous 2 rows at least basal persistant 40-50 florets all tubulate 1-2 mm bristles white on 1 row
                Thomas Le Bourgeois
                Attributions
                Contributors
                StatusUNDER_CREATION
                LicensesCC_BY
                References
                  Ecology

                  Chromolaena odorata is found on roadsides, abandoned fields and fallow, in plantations and tree crops.

                  C. odorata has a wide range of soil tolerance. It can grow on soils ranging from sand dunes to heavy clay soils (Liggit, 1983), however, it seems to prefer well-drained environments. The annual rainfall requirements of C. odorata are between 1000 and 2500 mm. On the other hand, it can grow with a rainfall of less than 1000 mm per year if the dry period is not too long. It has been found that the plant tolerates a marked dry period of 4 to 5 months (Mouloungou & Sigrist, 1993).
                  The development of C. odorata is strongly dependent on the availability of light, as its competitive strategy is based on a rapid phenotypic plasticity that can only be achieved efficiently with a high energy supply (Internet - (CAB-CPC, 2004)).
                  The distribution of the plant in altitude is limited to areas below 2000 m, the plant is sensitive to frost (Liggit, 1983).
                  C. odorata develops in many types of environments such as savannahs or degraded forests. It colonizes cleared or deforested areas, fallows, clearings and forest edges. The anthropized areas such as the edges of roads, tracks, the surroundings of villages are a potential place of development. C. odorata is a heliophilic plant and can develop in any sunny place (Mouloungou & Sigrist, 1993).
                  C. odorata has a competition strategy based on plasticity. It is therefore able to adapt to the constraints of the environment or to the constraints imposed in a culture. It is also very polymorphic according to the conditions encountered, thus in the West Indies, its height is between 0.30 and 1.50 m whereas in
                  Indochina, it takes the form of a liana and can rise up to 10 to 15 m (Poilane, 1952). In West Africa, the plant forms dense bushes of 2 to 2.50 m in full sunlight, otherwise it can elongate to find light up to 15 m (Tchoumé, 1980).
                  It can be considered a major weed in all perennial crops in the humid tropics (fields or forestry).

                  Central Africa: Chromolaena odorata grows along roadsides, in fallow land, in ruderal environments, on the edge of villages and in degraded savannahs.
                  French Guiana
                  : C. odorata is a species native to South America, so it is naturally present in French Guiana. It is found preferentially on the pioneer fronts and on the forest edge.
                  Madagascar: C. odorata is a good indicator of relatively rich soil. It grows on alluvial and rich humus ferrallitic soils, on sunny or lightly shaded ground. It is found along the roads and cultures, around the dwellings, on fallow land and disturbed areas after forest clearing. It is a weed of crops in wet areas, in upland cultures of rice, corn and fruit, more or less extensive of the East Coast up to 500 m altitude.
                  Mauritius: The species is abundant on roadsides, invading wasteland and forest clearings in the driest area of Mauritius.
                  Reunion: Absent.
                  South Africa: Chromolaena odorata forms thickets in wooded wasteland or at forest edges, in scrubland and along roadsides. 
                  West Indies
                  : Chromolaena odorata is a ruderal species that grows between 0 and 500 m altitude.

                  Wiktrop
                  AttributionsWiktrop
                  Contributors
                  StatusUNDER_CREATION
                  LicensesCC_BY_SA
                  References
                    Diseases

                    Host of diseases and pests of crops

                    Chromolaena odorata is a major host of Zonocerus elegans, and Zonocerus variegatus (stink locust).

                    It is also a minor host of Brachycaudus helichrys, Homona coffearia (coffee tortrix, tea tortrix, Camelia tortrix), Aphis spiraecola (thistle aphid, artichoke aphid), Anoplocnemis curvipes, Apion brunneonigrum, Acalitus adoratus, Melanagromyza eupatoriella, Mycovellosiella perfoliata, Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata, Septoria ekmaniana, Tetranychus urticae (two-spotted spider mite), Hypolixus truncatulus. It is also a host of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. elaeidis (vascular fusariosis of oil palm), and Alternaria zinniae.

                    Molard G., Le Bourgeois T., Camou R., Ehret P.
                    AttributionsMolard G., Le Bourgeois T., Camou R., Ehret P.
                    Contributors
                    StatusUNDER_CREATION
                    LicensesCC_BY
                    References
                      No Data
                      📚 Habitat and Distribution
                      Description

                      Geographical distibution

                      Reunion Island
                      Reunion Island
                      Seychelles
                      Seychelles

                      Origin

                      The area of origin of Chromolaena odorata corresponds to the whole of the tropical and sub-tropical zones of Americas, from the south of Florida to the north of Argentina.

                      Worldwide distribution

                      Its current world distribution extends along the intertropical belt located between the 30th parallel south and the 30th parallel north.
                      It was introduced in Asia in the XIX century and established itself in Bengal and in the low zone of Burma. These first colonizations favored its dispersion at the world level. It then gradually invaded Africa. It was reported in Nigeria around 1940, probably imported with Gmelina arborea seeds from Ceylon or introduced as a cover plant. Within 20 years, it became the main weed in Nigeria and started to expand its range in Africa. It is thus reported in Ivory Coast, Ghana, Central African Republic, Cameroon between 1960 and 1975. It is also reported in South Africa near Durban around 1940 (Mouloungou & Sigrist, 1993).
                      The distribution of C. odorata is very extensive. It has colonized most of the intertropical areas. The plant is present in a geographical area very close to Reunion and Mayotte, in particular in Mauritius, Comoros, South Africa and Southeast Asia with which exchanges are numerous.
                      The distribution area of C. odorata is not yet maximal, many areas can still be invaded according to CAB International.

                      It is still absent from different countries or regions:
                      Africa: Sierra Leone, Guinea-Bissau, Gambia, Senegal (southern part of the country), Mali (southern part of the country), Burkina Faso (southern part of the country), Sudan (southern part of the country), Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Angola, Zambia, Malawi, Mozambique, North East Botswana;
                      South East Asia: Taiwan;
                      Atlantic Ocean: Fernando Po, Sao Tome, Annobon;
                      Arabia: Eastern part of Asir, Masquat Region;
                      Indian Ocean: Comoros, Reunion, Mayotte, Seychelles;
                      Oceania: Indonesian Islands still free of the disease;
                      Pacific Ocean: Hawaii, Galapagos, New Caledonia.

                      Wiktrop
                      AttributionsWiktrop
                      Contributors
                      StatusUNDER_CREATION
                      LicensesCC_BY_SA
                      References
                        No Data
                        📚 Occurrence
                        No Data
                        📚 Demography and Conservation
                        Risk Statement

                        Risk analysis for Reunion island

                        Chromolaena odorata having evolved in areas where the competition pressures are strong, has important competitive advantages towards the species of Reunion. It develops more quickly than the native species in the first phenological stages. It thus has a certain competitive advantage and could take the ascendancy on the local species and colonize the open or degraded natural environments. These environments represent important surfaces of the island.
                        C. odorata could develop without constraints in all vegetation types where it can access the light resource, provided that the rainfall and the temperature are sufficient. In Reunion Island, this corresponds to the agricultural areas and to the sparse or degraded forest formations of low and medium altitude located preferentially on the east coast of the island. This represents a surface of about 30% of the island.

                        Molard G., Le Bourgeois T., Camou R., Ehret P.
                        AttributionsMolard G., Le Bourgeois T., Camou R., Ehret P.
                        Contributors
                        StatusUNDER_CREATION
                        LicensesCC_BY
                        References

                          Global harmfulness

                          Chromolaena odorata is a common and dominant species in the upland fields and fallow vegetation of the forest zone and reported by many as a troublesome weed (Johnson, 1997; Becker and Johnson, 2001; Kent et al., 2001; Anthofer and Kroschel, 2007). C. odorata gradually replaces indigenous species in fallow vegetation (Weise, 1995) and this in turn has consequences for the weed community in subsequent crops as it causes a predominance of broad-leaved species such as Ageratum conyzoides, Tridax procumbens and Phyllanthus amarus (Ikuenobe and Anoliefo, 2003). It is considered one of the most important weeds in the world (Holm & al, 1977).

                          Local harmfulness

                          Africa: Introduced in the 1940s as a cover crop in cocoa plantations, Chromolaena odorata has rapidly become invasive in most countries of tropical Africa, in Ghana (J.A. Timbilla & H. Braimah, 2000), Nigeria, Cameroon, Central Africa, Côte d'Ivoire, but also in South Africa (Mouloungou & Sigrist, 1993). Considered a particularly damaging weed to the "plantation economy" of some countries, its harmfulness in this context is currently under discussion, as it contributes to the restructuring of degraded soils and is less difficult to eliminate than species such as Imperata cylindrica when rehabilitating fallow land (Ird, 1996).
                          AustraliaChromolaena  odorata is an invasive, toxic plant, considered as a quarantine pest and control actions are carried out against it. The direct control program in 1994 cost $460000 and a 4-year biological control program cost $493 684
                          Benin: C. odorata is rare and not abundant.
                          Comoros: It grows as a ruderal in secondarized environments.
                          Ghana: Rare and scarce.
                          French GuianaChromolaena odorata does not pose any particular problem in pastures or in vegetable crops. It occurs occasionally in orchards with spontaneous plant cover but is not considered a constraint.
                          Hawaii: The plant has been evaluated and is considered a quarantine pest.
                          Madagascar Chromolaena odorata is a species recently introduced in Madagascar; it is still rare but locally abundant. This is particularly the case of primary infestation in East Coast, up to 500 m altitude in cropping systems of rainfed rice or corn on slash-and-burn land or poorly maintained fruit crops. It recolonizes fallows and is often considered an invasive plant.
                          Mali : Rare and scarce.
                          Mauritius : Due to the very low - frequency abundance in crops, this plant is not considered harmful. It grows as a ruderal in secondarized environments. But it demonstrates very high invasive capacity because of its large production of seeds that are easily dispersed by wind .
                          Nigeria : Rare and scarce.
                          Reunion: Absent .
                          South Africa: Chromolaena odorata smothers and completely suppresses native vegetation and has been known to replace up to 100% of native vegetation in some areas. It is also highly flammable, which encourages fires. Common in the lowlands of KwaZulu-Natal and in the provinces of Swaziland, Mpumalanga and Limpopo.

                          Wiktrop
                          AttributionsWiktrop
                          Contributors
                          StatusUNDER_CREATION
                          LicensesCC_BY
                          References
                            No Data
                            📚 Uses and Management
                            Uses
                            Agriculture: Chromolaena odorata is a plant that is sometimes encouraged for use in shifting slash-and-burn agriculture to compete with Imperata cylindrica (alang alang or cogon grass), which is harder to control. It was introduced to Ivory Coast in 1952  as a biocontrol agent to control Imperata spp. following a recommendation by a famous botanist, Auguste Chevalier. In Madagascar, fallows of C. odorata are good precedents, easily used as hedges under DMC. To recultivate after fallow land of C. odorata, the most effective is to mow it and apply 2,4-D after regrowth (about three weeks). There is thus directly a cover for direct sowing in good conditions.

                            Feeding: C. odorata can be used as fodder resource for animals

                            Natural insecticide: In South Sudan, against Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda), farmers are employing plant-based pesticide with a mixture of extracts of leaves of Chromolaena odorata, a common shrub weed, locally known as babachico (Siam weed, devil weed…) and chili pepper. (source : ETOP bulletin vii – 2018 USAID/OFDA issued August 6, 2018

                            Medicinal: Chromolaena odorata is used in the West Indies for various conditions (see description on the COATIS-RITA website). In French Guiana, Saramaca are using it against fever as a decoction or foliage mattress.
                            dummy
                            Attributionsdummy
                            Contributors
                            StatusUNDER_CREATION
                            LicensesCC_BY_SA
                            References
                              Management

                              Global control

                              Preventative measures: A Risk assessment of Chromolaena odorata for the Pacific region was prepared by Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk (PIER) using the Australian risk assessment system (Pheloung, 1995). The result is a score of 34 and a recommendation of: reject the plant for import (Australia) or species likely to be of high risk (Pacific). Using a revised climate model (Kriticos et al. 2005) of the estimated potential distribution of C. odorata it was predicted that Mediterranean, semi-arid and temperate climates are unsuitable for its establishment. Much of tropical Africa, the north-eastern coast of Australia and most Pacific islands are at risk of invasion. The distribution of C. odorata in South Africa extends further south than predicted by the model based on Asian and American distribution records, supporting the claim that the South African variety of C. odorata has different climatic requirements to the varieties elsewhere (EPPO 2005).

                              Physical: Manual slashing and use of bush-cutter or tractor-drawn implements are commonly used methods of control. Slashing causes regeneration unless followed by other control methods. Manual weeding is labour intensive. The use of tractor drawn equipment is limited to areas that are accessible (Ecoport).

                              Chemical: Chemical control using herbicides applied at the seedling stage or on regrowth has given encouraging results. Triclopyr has proven to be the most effective. However, problems in herbicide use include the high cost of the chemicals and their application, ecological concerns and, non-compatibility in many cropping and other environmental situations (Ecoport). Removing seed and flower heads and spraying with 2,4-D Amine plus Picloram (Tordon in Australia) kills top growth and (picloram kills the root system is recommended (Rod Randall, pers. comm. 2000).

                              Biological: The biological control agent Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata has been introduced into Guam, where it effectively defoliates pure stands. It is less successful in scattered plants and patches. It has also been introduced into Palau, Kosrae, Pohnpei, Yap and Saipan Island (Mariner Islands) where it has been effective in reducing C. odorata. It has also been released on Sumatra, Indonesia, where it is effective in reducing densities of the weed. Releases into other parts of Indonesia appear to have failed. Another species, the stem gall fly Cecidochares connexa (originally collected from C. odorata in Mexico, Brazil and Bolivia Cruttwell 1974) is a suitable biological control agent for C. odorata (Cruttwell McFadyen Chenon and Sipayung 2003). Most gall-forming species of the tephritid generaCecidochares Bezzi are highly host specific, sometimes attacking only a single plant species (Foote et al. 1993, in Cruttwell McFadyen Chenon and Sipayung 2003). Based on the results of host testing of C. connexa was granted Indonesian Government allowance for field release in 1995 and is now established on most of the larger Indonesian islands (Tijitrosemito 2002, Wilson and Widayanto 2002, in Cruttwell McFadyen Chenon and Sipayung 2003). Since then it has been released in Palau, Papau New Guinea and the Philippines (Esguerra 2002, Orapa et al. 2002, in Cruttwell McFadyen Chenon and Sipayung 2003; Dr. Muniappan, pers. comm.). Die-back and death of plants have been recorded at many sites within 3 to 5 years of release, especially in low altitude sites (less than 300m) with a short dry season (Cruttwell McFadyen Chenon and Sipayung 2003). At higher altitude sites (over 600m) or where cloudy conditions, cold temperatures or long dry seasons limit the number and activity of flies control is slower and less adequate (Cruttwell McFadyen Chenon and Sipayung 2003).

                              List of biological regulators of C. odorata (CAB-CPC 2004):
                              Pathogens (Anhelia niger in Brazil; Cionothrix praelonga in Colombia, Dominica, Mexico, Trinidad, Venezuela; Mycovellosiella perfoliata in Brazil; Septoria ekmania in Brazil).
                              Pests (Acalithus adoratus in Bolivia, Brazil, Trinidad, Indonesia (introduced), Malaysia (introduced), Philippines (introduced), Thailand (introduced); Apion brunneonigrum in Argentina, Trinidad, Venezuela; Cecidochares connexa, Actinote anteas in Indonesia; Melanagromyza eupatoriella in Bolivia, Brazil, Trinidad; Mescina parvula in Argentina, Mexico, Trinidad; Pareuchaetes aurata in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay; Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata in USA, Bahamas, Mexico, Ecuador, Guyana, Venezuela, Tobago, Trinidad, introduced in India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Guam, Ghana).

                              Management options for perennial weeds in irrigated rice: http://portal.wikwio.org/document/show/26


                              Local control

                              Madagascar: Manual control of C. odorata is painful. Chemically it is controlled by pre-emergence herbicide diuron, and post-emergence by 2,4 -D and glyphosate.
                              Maurice: This plant can be removed manually or treated with fluroxypyr.
                              Reunion: Absent .

                               

                              dummy
                              Attributionsdummy
                              Contributors
                              StatusUNDER_CREATION
                              LicensesCC_BY_SA
                              References
                                No Data
                                📚 Information Listing
                                References
                                1. Johnson, D.E. 1997. Les adventices en riziculture en Afrique de l'Ouest. ADRAO/WARDA, Bouaké, Côte-d'Ivoire.
                                1. Marnotte, P. and A. Carrara. (2007). "Plantes des rizières de Guyane." from http://plantes-rizieres-guyane.cirad.fr/.
                                2. Le Bourgeois, T., Camou, R. & Ehret, P. 2006. Analyse de risque phytosanitaire - Appui à la rédaction de la réglementation spécifique aux départements d'outre-mer. Cas des plantes envahissantes. Montpellier, France, Poseidom, Cirad, Dgal-Sdqpv. CDrom
                                3. Holm, L.G., Plucknett, D., L., Pancho, J.V., Herberger, J.P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii.
                                4. Berton, A. (2020). Flore spontanée des cultures maraichères et fruitières de Guyane. Guide de reconnaissance des 140 adventices les plus communes des parcelles cultivées. Cayenne, Guyane, FREDON Guyane: 186.https://portal.wiktrop.org/document/show/173
                                5. Invasives South Africa https://invasives.org.za/fact-sheet/triffid-weed/
                                6. Plants of the World Online https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:57443-2
                                7. The Wolrd Flora Online https://www.worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-0000067484
                                8. Flora of China http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242312602
                                9. CABI https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.23248
                                10. Fournet J., 2002. Flore illustrée des phanérogames de Guadeloupe et de Martinique. Montpellier, France, Cirad, Gondwana éditions.
                                1. Hutchinson, J., Dalziel, J.M., Keay, R.W.J., Hepper, F.N. 1963. Flora of west tropical africa. The Whitefriars Press, London & Tonbridge, Great Britain.
                                1. Hind, D. J. N., Jeffrey, C. & Scott, A. J., 1993. Flore des Mascareignes, Vol. 109 Composées. in Antoine, R., Bosser J., Fergusson, I.K. Soopramanien C. ed. Flore des Mascareignes, La Réunion, Maurice, Rodrigues. MSIRI, Maurice, IRD, France, RBG, UK.
                                1. Grard, P., Homsombath, K., Kessler, P., Khuon, E., Le Bourgeois, T., Prospéri, J., Risdale, C. 2006. Oswald V.1.0: A multimedia identification system of the major weeds of rice paddy fields of Cambodia and Lao P.D.R. In Cirad [ed.]. Cirad, Montpellier, France. Cdrom. ISBN 978-2-87614-653-2.
                                1. Le Bourgeois, T., P. Grard, L. C. Foxcroft, D. Thompson, A. Carrara, A. Guézou, R. W. Taylor and T. Marshall (2013). Pl@ntInvasive-Kruger V.1.0 : Alien plants of the Kruger National Park. Cdrom. Montpellier, France, Skukuza, South Africa, Cirad-SANparks-SAEON eds.
                                1. Pancho, J.V., Obien, S.R. 1995. Manual of Ricefield Weeds in the Philippines. Philippine Rice Research Institute, Munoz, Nueva Ecija, Philippines.
                                1. Radanachaless, T., Maxwell, J.F. 1994. Weeds of soybean fields in Thailand. Multiple Cropping Center ed., Chiang Mai Univ., Chiang Mai, Thailand.
                                1. Soerjani, M., Kostermans, A.J.G.H., Tjitrosemito, G. 1987. Weeds of rice in Indonesia. Balai Puskata, Jakarta, Indonesia.
                                1. Grard, P., T. Le Bourgeois, J. Rodenburg, P. Marnotte, A. Carrara, R. Irakiza, D. Makokha, G. kyalo, K. Aloys, K. Iswaria, N. Nguyen and G. Tzelepoglou (2012). AFROweeds V.1.0: African weeds of rice. Cédérom. Montpellier, France & Cotonou, Bénin, Cirad-AfricaRice eds.
                                1. Fournet, J. 2002. Flore illustrée des phanérogames de Guadeloupe et de Martinique. Cirad, Gondwana éditions, Montpellier, France.
                                1. Becker, M., Johnson, D.E., 2001. Cropping intensity effects on upland rice yield and sustainability in West Africa. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 59, 107-117.
                                2. Anthofer, J., Kroschel, J., 2007. Effect of Mucuna fallow on weed dry matter and composition in succeeding maize. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 24, 397-414.
                                3. Akobundu I.O. and Agyakwa C.W (1998): a Handbook of West African Weeds. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria. 170p.
                                4. Kent, R.J., Johnson, D.E., Becker, M., 2001. The influences of cropping system on weed communities of rice in Côte d'Ivoire, West Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 87, 299-307.
                                5. TT Struhsaker, PJ Struhsaker, KS Siex (May 2005). Conserving Africa's rain forests: problems in protected areas and possible solutions. Biological Conservation 123 (1): 45-54.
                                6. Ikuenobe, C.E., Anoliefo, G.O., 2003. Influence of Chromolaena odorata and Mucuna pruriens fallow duration on weed infestation. Weed Res. 43, 199-207.
                                1. ZACHARIADES C., DAY M., MUNIAPPAN R., and REDDY G. V. P. 2009 -Chromolaena odorata (L.) King and Robinson (Asteraceae) Biological Control of Tropical Weeds using Arthropods, éd. R. Muniappan, G. V. P. Reddy, and A. Raman. Cambridge University Press. 2009 p. 130-162.
                                1. Timbilla J.A. & Braimah H. (2000) Establishment, spread and Impact of Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata (Lepidoptera : Arctiidae) an exotic predator of the siam weed, Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae : Eupatoriae) in Ghana, Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds 4-14 july 1999, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA. Neal R. Spencer [ed.]. pp 105-111.
                                2. Tchoumé (1980) in Audru, l’herbe du Laos, CIRAD-IEMVT, 1988, 186 p.
                                3. Seibert T.F. (1989) Biological control of the weed, C. odorata (Asteraceae) by Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata (Lep.: Arctiidae) on Guam and the northern Mariana Island, Entomophaga, 34(4), pp 531-539.
                                4. Pancho J. & Pucknett D. (1971) Chromolaena odorata a new record of a noxious weed in the Philippines, journal of animal science, 8(2), pp 143-149.
                                5. Nakumura N. & Nemoto N. (1993) Allelopathic potential of Eupatorium odoratum in abadonned shifting cultivation fields in the tropics. Weed Research, Tokyo, pp 103-108.
                                6. Muniappan R. Marutani M. Denton G.R.W. (1988) Introduction and establishment of Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata Rego Barros (Arctiidae) against C. odorata in the Western Caroline Islands. Journal of biological control, 2(2), pp 141-142.
                                7. Muniappan R. & Marutani M. (1991) Mechanical, cultural and chemical control of Chromolaena odorata. In : Muniappan R. Ferrar P.eds. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Chromolaena odorata. Biotrop special publication, 44, pp 79-82.
                                8. Mouloungou J. & Sigrist J.C. (1993) Chromolaena odorata, rapport de stage, CNEARC, France, 30 p.
                                9. McFayden R.E. (1996) Biocontrol of Chromolaena odorata : divided we fail, Proceedings of the IX International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, South Africa, pp 455-459.
                                10. Liggit B. (1983) The invasive alien plant Chromolaena odorata, with regard to its status and control in natal. Monograph 2, Pietermaritzburg: Institute of natural ressources.
                                11. Ivens G. W. (1974) The problem of Eupatorium odoratum in Nigeria. PANS 20, pp 76-82.
                                12. Hardwick G. & Waterhouse B.M. (1996) Siam weed outbreak in far northern Queensland: Progress report on eradication effort. Proceedings of the Eleventh Australian Weeds Conference, October 1996, Melbourne, Australia.
                                13. Holm L.G. Pluknett D.L. Pancho J.V. Herberger J.P. (1977) World’s Worst Weeds, University press of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp 212-215.
                                14. Audru J., Bereketou M., Deat M., De Wispelaerew F., Dufour F., Kintz D., Le Masson A., Menozzi P., (1988), l’herbe du Laos, Etudes et synthèse de l’IEMVT, n°28, Paris, France.
                                Information Listing > References
                                1. Johnson, D.E. 1997. Les adventices en riziculture en Afrique de l'Ouest. ADRAO/WARDA, Bouaké, Côte-d'Ivoire.
                                2. Marnotte, P. and A. Carrara. (2007). "Plantes des rizières de Guyane." from http://plantes-rizieres-guyane.cirad.fr/.
                                3. Le Bourgeois, T., Camou, R. & Ehret, P. 2006. Analyse de risque phytosanitaire - Appui à la rédaction de la réglementation spécifique aux départements d'outre-mer. Cas des plantes envahissantes. Montpellier, France, Poseidom, Cirad, Dgal-Sdqpv. CDrom
                                4. Holm, L.G., Plucknett, D., L., Pancho, J.V., Herberger, J.P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii.
                                5. Berton, A. (2020). Flore spontanée des cultures maraichères et fruitières de Guyane. Guide de reconnaissance des 140 adventices les plus communes des parcelles cultivées. Cayenne, Guyane, FREDON Guyane: 186.https://portal.wiktrop.org/document/show/173
                                6. Invasives South Africa https://invasives.org.za/fact-sheet/triffid-weed/
                                7. Plants of the World Online https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:57443-2
                                8. The Wolrd Flora Online https://www.worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-0000067484
                                9. Flora of China http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242312602
                                10. CABI https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.23248
                                11. Fournet J., 2002. Flore illustrée des phanérogames de Guadeloupe et de Martinique. Montpellier, France, Cirad, Gondwana éditions.
                                12. Hutchinson, J., Dalziel, J.M., Keay, R.W.J., Hepper, F.N. 1963. Flora of west tropical africa. The Whitefriars Press, London & Tonbridge, Great Britain.
                                13. Hind, D. J. N., Jeffrey, C. & Scott, A. J., 1993. Flore des Mascareignes, Vol. 109 Composées. in Antoine, R., Bosser J., Fergusson, I.K. Soopramanien C. ed. Flore des Mascareignes, La Réunion, Maurice, Rodrigues. MSIRI, Maurice, IRD, France, RBG, UK.
                                14. Grard, P., Homsombath, K., Kessler, P., Khuon, E., Le Bourgeois, T., Prospéri, J., Risdale, C. 2006. Oswald V.1.0: A multimedia identification system of the major weeds of rice paddy fields of Cambodia and Lao P.D.R. In Cirad [ed.]. Cirad, Montpellier, France. Cdrom. ISBN 978-2-87614-653-2.
                                15. Le Bourgeois, T., P. Grard, L. C. Foxcroft, D. Thompson, A. Carrara, A. Guézou, R. W. Taylor and T. Marshall (2013). Pl@ntInvasive-Kruger V.1.0 : Alien plants of the Kruger National Park. Cdrom. Montpellier, France, Skukuza, South Africa, Cirad-SANparks-SAEON eds.
                                16. Pancho, J.V., Obien, S.R. 1995. Manual of Ricefield Weeds in the Philippines. Philippine Rice Research Institute, Munoz, Nueva Ecija, Philippines.
                                17. Radanachaless, T., Maxwell, J.F. 1994. Weeds of soybean fields in Thailand. Multiple Cropping Center ed., Chiang Mai Univ., Chiang Mai, Thailand.
                                18. Soerjani, M., Kostermans, A.J.G.H., Tjitrosemito, G. 1987. Weeds of rice in Indonesia. Balai Puskata, Jakarta, Indonesia.
                                19. Grard, P., T. Le Bourgeois, J. Rodenburg, P. Marnotte, A. Carrara, R. Irakiza, D. Makokha, G. kyalo, K. Aloys, K. Iswaria, N. Nguyen and G. Tzelepoglou (2012). AFROweeds V.1.0: African weeds of rice. Cédérom. Montpellier, France & Cotonou, Bénin, Cirad-AfricaRice eds.
                                20. Fournet, J. 2002. Flore illustrée des phanérogames de Guadeloupe et de Martinique. Cirad, Gondwana éditions, Montpellier, France.
                                21. Becker, M., Johnson, D.E., 2001. Cropping intensity effects on upland rice yield and sustainability in West Africa. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 59, 107-117.
                                22. Anthofer, J., Kroschel, J., 2007. Effect of Mucuna fallow on weed dry matter and composition in succeeding maize. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 24, 397-414.
                                23. Akobundu I.O. and Agyakwa C.W (1998): a Handbook of West African Weeds. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria. 170p.
                                24. Kent, R.J., Johnson, D.E., Becker, M., 2001. The influences of cropping system on weed communities of rice in Côte d'Ivoire, West Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 87, 299-307.
                                25. TT Struhsaker, PJ Struhsaker, KS Siex (May 2005). Conserving Africa's rain forests: problems in protected areas and possible solutions. Biological Conservation 123 (1): 45-54.
                                26. Ikuenobe, C.E., Anoliefo, G.O., 2003. Influence of Chromolaena odorata and Mucuna pruriens fallow duration on weed infestation. Weed Res. 43, 199-207.
                                27. ZACHARIADES C., DAY M., MUNIAPPAN R., and REDDY G. V. P. 2009 -Chromolaena odorata (L.) King and Robinson (Asteraceae) Biological Control of Tropical Weeds using Arthropods, éd. R. Muniappan, G. V. P. Reddy, and A. Raman. Cambridge University Press. 2009 p. 130-162.
                                28. Timbilla J.A. & Braimah H. (2000) Establishment, spread and Impact of Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata (Lepidoptera : Arctiidae) an exotic predator of the siam weed, Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae : Eupatoriae) in Ghana, Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds 4-14 july 1999, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA. Neal R. Spencer [ed.]. pp 105-111.
                                29. Tchoumé (1980) in Audru, l’herbe du Laos, CIRAD-IEMVT, 1988, 186 p.
                                30. Seibert T.F. (1989) Biological control of the weed, C. odorata (Asteraceae) by Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata (Lep.: Arctiidae) on Guam and the northern Mariana Island, Entomophaga, 34(4), pp 531-539.
                                31. Pancho J. & Pucknett D. (1971) Chromolaena odorata a new record of a noxious weed in the Philippines, journal of animal science, 8(2), pp 143-149.
                                32. Nakumura N. & Nemoto N. (1993) Allelopathic potential of Eupatorium odoratum in abadonned shifting cultivation fields in the tropics. Weed Research, Tokyo, pp 103-108.
                                33. Muniappan R. Marutani M. Denton G.R.W. (1988) Introduction and establishment of Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata Rego Barros (Arctiidae) against C. odorata in the Western Caroline Islands. Journal of biological control, 2(2), pp 141-142.
                                34. Muniappan R. & Marutani M. (1991) Mechanical, cultural and chemical control of Chromolaena odorata. In : Muniappan R. Ferrar P.eds. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Chromolaena odorata. Biotrop special publication, 44, pp 79-82.
                                35. Mouloungou J. & Sigrist J.C. (1993) Chromolaena odorata, rapport de stage, CNEARC, France, 30 p.
                                36. McFayden R.E. (1996) Biocontrol of Chromolaena odorata : divided we fail, Proceedings of the IX International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, South Africa, pp 455-459.
                                37. Liggit B. (1983) The invasive alien plant Chromolaena odorata, with regard to its status and control in natal. Monograph 2, Pietermaritzburg: Institute of natural ressources.
                                38. Ivens G. W. (1974) The problem of Eupatorium odoratum in Nigeria. PANS 20, pp 76-82.
                                39. Hardwick G. & Waterhouse B.M. (1996) Siam weed outbreak in far northern Queensland: Progress report on eradication effort. Proceedings of the Eleventh Australian Weeds Conference, October 1996, Melbourne, Australia.
                                40. Holm L.G. Pluknett D.L. Pancho J.V. Herberger J.P. (1977) World’s Worst Weeds, University press of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp 212-215.
                                41. Audru J., Bereketou M., Deat M., De Wispelaerew F., Dufour F., Kintz D., Le Masson A., Menozzi P., (1988), l’herbe du Laos, Etudes et synthèse de l’IEMVT, n°28, Paris, France.

                                Etude floristique et phytoécologique des adventices des complexes sucriers de Ferké 1 et 2, de Borotou-Koro et de Zuenoula, en Côte d'Ivoire

                                Thomas Le Bourgeois
                                Images
                                Thomas Le Bourgeois
                                Attributions
                                Contributors
                                StatusUNDER_CREATION
                                LicensesCC_BY
                                References
                                  No Data
                                  🐾 Taxonomy
                                  📊 Temporal Distribution
                                  📷 Related Observations
                                  👥 Groups
                                  WIKTROP - Weed Identification and Knowledge in the Tropical and Mediterranean areasWIKTROP - Weed Identification and Knowledge in the Tropical and Mediterranean areas
                                  Powered byBiodiversity Informatics Platform - v4.2.1
                                  Technology PartnerStrand Life Sciences