Delairea odorata (Cape ivy)
Identity
- Preferred Scientific Name
- Delairea odorata Lemaire
- Preferred Common Name
- Cape ivy
- Other Scientific Names
- Senecio mikanioides Harvey
- Senecio mikanioides Harvey ex Otto
- Senecio mikanioides Otto ex Walp.
- Local Common Names
- Australiaivy groundsel
- GermanyGreiskraut, Efeu-
- New ZealandGerman ivy
- USAGerman ivyparlor ivy
- USA/HawaiiItalian ivy
- EPPO code
- SENMI (Senecio mikanioides)
Pictures
Distribution
Prevention and Control
Cultural Control
Control of D. odorata with fire or grazing animals has not been reported, although using goats might be feasible. However, D. odorata contains pyrrolizidine alkaloids, which are known to be potent mammalian hepato-toxins.
Mechanical Control
Although very labour intensive, hand-pulling of D. odorata is usually the preferred control method. To prevent new infestations in other areas, the plant material that has been removed must be disposed of carefully.
Chemical Control
Clopyralid has been used successfully in Australia (Fagg, 1989). In California, glyphosate alone provided only very temporary control (Bossard and Benefield, 1995), but when a mixture of glyphosate + triclopyr + silicone surfactant in water was used, it provided successful control after two applications (Bossard, 2000). Damage to non-target vegetation is likely, and care should be taken to minimize this.
Biological Control
There are no approved biological control agents available to manage D. odorata. However, in the United States, a project to develop such agents was launched by USDA-ARS in 1998 (Balciunas and Archbald, 1999). Surveys were conducted in South Africa for natural enemies of this vine and during two years research, several hundred insects attacking D. odorata were identified (Grobbelaar et al., 2003). Two of these insect species, the Cape ivy gall fly (Parafreutreta regalis Munro) and the Cape ivy stem moth (Digitivalva delaireae Gaedike & Kruger) are currently being evaluated at the USDA-ARS quarantine facility in Albany, California and at a facility in Pretoria, South Africa to determine if they are safe enough to release in North America (Balciunas, 2001a).
Integrated Control
Whatever control method is used, careful monitoring and removal of any resprouts and seedlings is essential, or within a matter of months the treated area will become indistinguishable from adjacent untreated areas.
Impact
Probably the greatest costs are borne by agencies and individuals trying to get rid of this invasive alien species. For example, Golden Gate National Recreation Area near San Francisco, California, USA has spent over US$600,000 over three years trying to eradicate this vine. Keeping culverts, drains, and roadsides clear of this pest also is problematical since use of herbicides might be highly restricted or even prohibited, and manual removal by hand exorbitantly expensive. It has also been implicated in having caused cattle poisoning in New Zealand (Verdcourt and Trump, 1969).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © CABI. CABI is a registered EU trademark. This article is published under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
History
Published online: 24 November 2019
Language
English
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
SCITE_
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
EXPORT CITATIONSExport Citation
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login Options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.