Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Genetic assessment of eight Corchorus spp. (Tiliaceae) using RAPD and ISSR markers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Nucleus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparison of the efficiency of RAPD and ISSR primers using different genetic parameters like polymorphism percentage, effective alleles per locus (Aep), genetic diversity per locus (Hep), Shannon diversity index (I), polymorphic information content (PIC) and marker index (MI) has been performed in 8 Indian grown Corchorus spp. (2n = 14) of the family Tiliaceae (C. capsularis L., C. olitorius L., C. aestuans L., C. fascicularis Lamk., C. pseudocapsularis L., C. pseudoolitorius I. and Z., C. tridens L. and C. trilocularis L.). The objective of the work is to develop a simple, efficient and cost effective primer based system for quick genetic evaluation of Corchorus germplasms. Result indicated that OPA 03, OPA 05, OPA 06, OPB 03, OPB 06, OPC 05 and OPC 10 among the employed RAPD markers and (GA)12, (CA)8GC and (GATA)4 among ISSR primers are efficient and effective. Further, relatedness between the species has also been noted using principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis by Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) with an objective for efficient breeding and crop improvement. Unrooted phylogenetic tree constructed from molecular data of the studied species revealed possible divaricated mode of origin of Corchorus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson JA, Churchill GA, Autrique JE, Tanksley SD, Sorrells ME. Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome. 1993;36:181–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Basu A, Ghosh M, Mayer R, Powel W, Basak SL, Sen SK. Analysis of genetic diversity in cultivated jute determined by means of SSR markers and AFLP profiling. Crop Sci. 2004;44:678–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Datta RM, Panda BS, Roy K, Bose MM, De TK. Cytotaxonomic studies of different Corchorus (jute) species. Bot Mag (Tokyo). 1966;79:467–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Datta RM, Mukhopadhaya D, Panda BS, Sasmal PK. Cytotaxonomic studies of different Corchorus (jute) species II. Cytologia. 1975;40:685–92.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dillon WR, Goldstein M. Multivariate analysis methods and application. New York: Wiley; 1984.

  6. Garcia-Vallve S, Palau J, Romeu A. Horizontal gene transfer in glycosyl hydrolases inferred from codon usage in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;9:1125–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Godwin ID, Aitken E, Smith LW. Application of inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers to plant genetics. Electrophoresis. 1997;18:1524–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta MY, Chyi SJ, Romero-Severson J, Owen JL. Amplification of DNA markers from evolutionarily diverse genomes using single primers of simple sequence repeat. Theor Appl Genet. 1994;89:998–1006.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hossain MD, Haque S, Khan H. DNA fingerprinting of jute germplasm by RAPD. J Biochem Mol Biol. 2002;35:414–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hossain MB, Awal A, Rahman MA, Haque S, Khan H. Distinction between cold-sensitive and -tolerant jute by DNA polymorphisms. J Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;36:427–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huq S, Islam MS, Sajib AA, Ashraf N, Haque S, Khan H. Genetic diversity and relationships in jute (corchorus spp.) revealed by SSR markers. Bangladesh J Bot. 2009;38:153–61.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Islam AS, Rashid A. First successful hybridization between the two jute yielding species, Corchorus olitorius (Tossa) X C. capsularis (White). Nature. 1960;185:258–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jain JP. Statistical techniques in quantitative genetics. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Ltd.; 1982.

  14. Karmakar PG, Hazra SK, Ramasubramanian T, Mandal RK, Sinha MK, Sen HS, editors. Jute and allied fibre updates: production and technology. Brrackpore: CRIJAF; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kesari V, Sathyanarayana VM, Parida A, Rangan L. Molecular marker-based characterization in candidate plus trees of Pongamia pinnata, a potential biodiesel legume. AoB Plants Vol. 2010, plq017, doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plq017

  16. Khatun A. Recent agricultural developments in jute, kenaf and mesta through traditional and biotechnological approaches. A seminar on jute and kenaf held in Myanmar organized by the Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation, Myanmar Jute Industries and the International Jute Study Group (IJSG). Myanmar; 2007. p. 1–13.

  17. Kundu BC. Origin of jute. Indian J Genet. 1951;11:95–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lacerda DR, Acedo MDP, Lemos Filho JP, Lovato MB. Genetic diversity and structure of natural populations of Plathymenia reticulata (Mimosoideae), a tropical tree from the Brazilian Cerrado. Mol Ecol. 2001;10:1143–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mahapatra AK, Saha A, Basak SL. Origin, taxonomy and distribution of Corchorus species in India. Green J. 1998;1:64–82.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mahapatra AK, Saha A. Genetic resources of jute and allied fibre crops. In: Karmakar PG, Hazra SK, Ramasubramanian T, Sinha MK, Sen HS, editors. Jute and allied fibres updates: production and technology. Brrackpore: CRIJAF; 2008. p. 18–37.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maity S, Datta AK. Cytomorphological studies in F1 hybrids (Corchorus capsularis L. × Corchorus trilocularis L.) of jute (Tiliaceae). Comp Cytogenet. 2008;2:143–9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maity S, Datta AK. Karyomorphology in nine species of jute (Corchorus L., Tiliaceae). Cytologia. 2009;74:273–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maity S, Datta AK. Cytomorphological studies in F2, F3 and induced amphidiploid of jute (Corchorus trilocularis L. X Corchorus capsularis L.). Nucleus. 2010;53:85–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mandal A, Datta AK. Secondary chromosome associations and cytomixis in Corchorus spp. Cytologia. 2011;76:337–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mandal A, Datta AK. Inter- and intra-plant variations in cytomictic behavior of chromosomes in Corchorus fascicularis Lamk. (Tiliaceae). Cytologia. 2012;77:269–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Martynov SP, Dobrotvorskaya TV, Dotlacil L, Stehno Z, Faberova I, Bares I. Genealogical approach to the formation of the winter wheat core collection. Russian J Genet. 2003;39:917–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mir RR, Rustagi S, Sharma S, Singh R, Goyal A, Kumar J, et al. A preliminary genetic analysis of fibre traits and the use of new genomic SSRs for genetic diversity in jute. Euphytica. 2008;161:413–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Muthusamy S, Kanagarajan S, Ponnusamy S. Efficiency of RAPD and ISSR markers system in accessing genetic variation of rice bean (Vigna umbellata) landraces. Electron J Biotechn. 2008;11. doi: 10.2225/vol11-issue3-fulltext-8

  29. Noormohammadi Z, Fasihee A, Homaee-Rashidpoor S, Sheidai M, Baraki SG, Mazooji A, et al. Genetic variation among Iranian pomegranates (Punica granatum L.) using RAPD, ISSR and SSR markers. Australian J Crop Sci. 2012;6:268–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ogunkanmi LA, Okunowo WO, Oyelakin OO, Oboh BO, Adesina OO, Adekoya KO, et al. Assessment of genetic relationships between two species of jute plants using phenotypic and RAPD markers. Int J Bot. 2010;6:107–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Palve SM, Sinha MK, Chattopadhyay S. Genetic variability for fibre strength and fineness in wild relative of genus Corchorus. In: Hazra SK, Karmakar PG, editors. Proceedings of National Seminar on Diversified Uses of Jute and Allied Fibre Crops. CRIJAF, NIRJAFT and IFS(ER), Barrackpore, India; 2004. p. 99–103.

  32. Parsons JB, Newbury HT, Jackson MT, Ford-Lloyd BV. Contrasting genetic diversity relationships are revealed in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using different marker types. Mol Breed. 1997;3:115–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Patamsytė J, Čėsnienė T, Naugžemys D, Kleizaitė V, Vaitkūnienė, Rančelis V, et al. Genetic diversity of warty cabbage (Bunias orientalis L.) revealed by RAPD and ISSR markers. Žemdirbystė Agric. 2011;98:293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Patel GI, Datta RM. Pollen grain studies in various types of Corchorus olitorius L, C capsularis and some other species of Corchorus. Grana. 1958;1:18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Patzak J. Comparison of RAPD, STS, ISSR and AFLP molecular methods used for assessment of genetic diversity in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Euphytica. 2001;121:9–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Purseglove JW. Tropical crops: dicotyledons 2. Longmans: Green; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Qi J, Zhou D, Wu W, Lin L, Wu J, Fang P. Application of ISSR technology in genetic diversity detection of jute. Chin J Appl Ecol. 2003;14:1473–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Qian W, Ge S, Hong DY. Genetic variation within and among populations of wild rice Oryza granulata from China detected by rRAPD and ISSR markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2001;102:440–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Roy A, Bandyopadhyay A, Mahapatra AK, Ghosh SK, Singh NK, Bansal KC, et al. Evaluation of genetic diversity in jute (Corchorus) species using STMS, ISSR and RAPD markers. Plant Breed. 2006;125:292–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Saini M, Singh S, Hussain Z, Sikka VK. RAPD analysis in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek.] II: a comparison of efficiency parameters of RAPD primer. Indian J Biotech. 2010;9:137–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tao AF, Qi JM, Li ML, Fang PP, Lin LH, Xu JT. Origin and evolution of jute analyzed by SRAP and ISSR methods. Chin J Agric Sci. 2012;45:16–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Weir BS. Genetic data analysis II: methods for discrete population genetic data. Sunderland: Sinauer Publishers; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yu LX, Nguyen NT. Genetic variation detected with RAPD markers among upland and lowland rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet. 1994;87:668–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhou Y, Zhou C, Yao H, Liu Y, Tu R. Application of ISSR markers in detection of genetic variation among Chinese yam (Dioscorea opposita Thunb) cultivars. Life Sci J. 2008;5:6–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The aided research grant by University Grant Commission (UGC), New Delhi is thankfully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany, Cytogenetics, Genetics and Plant Breeding Section, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, 741235, West Bengal, India

    Aninda Mandal & Animesh K. Datta

  2. Department of Biotechnology, Haldia Institute of Technology, Haldia, 721657, West Bengal, India

    Siraj Datta

  3. Department of Botany, Pteridology-Palaeobotany Section, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, 741235, West Bengal, India

    Sudha Gupta

Authors
  1. Aninda Mandal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Animesh K. Datta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Siraj Datta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sudha Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Animesh K. Datta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mandal, A., Datta, A.K., Datta, S. et al. Genetic assessment of eight Corchorus spp. (Tiliaceae) using RAPD and ISSR markers. Nucleus 56, 23–30 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-013-0076-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-013-0076-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation