Abstract
The Mentha germplasm collection housed at the USDA National Clonal Germplasm Repository is a valuable source of diversity for genetic studies and mint breeding. We surveyed phenotypes and genotypes of accessions belonging to two species ancestral to commercial peppermint: M. aquatica and M. suaveolens. Morphology, ploidy, essential oil composition, and relative Verticillium wilt resistance were assessed. Genotyping with simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers was performed in order to establish a set of informative markers for distinguishing accessions from each other. M. suaveolens accessions were triploid or tetraploid, while M. aquatica accessions were octoploid or nonaploid. Holoploid genome sizes differed significantly among accessions within both species. Half of the M. aquatica accessions had (+)-menthofuran as the primary oil constituent, while other accessions showed atypical oil profiles. Most M. suaveolens accessions had high levels of either piperitenone oxide, (−)-carvone, or trans-piperitenone oxide. M. aquatica accessions showed a range of Verticillium wilt resistance to susceptibility, while most M. suaveolens accessions were highly wilt-resistant. Results from genotyping the accessions with nine SSR markers distinguished three groups: one mainly M. suaveolens, one mostly M. aquatica, and one with a mixture of the species. This study enables updates of accession descriptions in the Germplasm Resources Information Network database, and increases the utility of the Mentha collection to the research community.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhattarai G, Mehlenbacher SA (2017) In silico development and characterization of tri-nucleotide simple sequence repeat markers in hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.). PLOS ONE 12(5):e0178061. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178061
Bruvo R, Michiels NK, D’Souza TG, Schulenburg H (2004) A simple method for the calculation of microsatellite genotype distances irrespective of ploidy level. Mol Ecol 13(7):2101–2106
Chambers HL, Hummer KE (1994) Chromosome counts in the Mentha collection at the USDA: ARS National Clonal Germplasm Repository. Taxon 43(3):423. https://doi.org/10.2307/1222717
Chen H, Chung M-C, Tsai Y-C, Wei F-J, Hsieh J-S et al (2015) Distribution of new satellites and simple sequence repeats in annual and perennial Glycine species. Bot Stud 56(1):22
Dung JK, Schroeder BK, Johnson DA (2010) Evaluation of Verticillium wilt resistance in Mentha arvensis and M. longifolia genotypes. Plant Dis 94(10):1255–1260
FAOSTAT (2018). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. Accessed 31 July 2018
Fradin EF, Zhang Z, Juarez Ayala JC, Castroverde CDM, Nazar RN et al (2009) Genetic dissection of Verticillium wilt resistance mediated by tomato Ve1. Plant Physiol 150(1):320–332. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.136762
Gao X, Wheeler T, Li Z, Kenerley CM, He P et al (2011) Silencing GhNDR1 and GhMKK2 compromised cotton resistance to Verticillium wilt. Plant J 66(2):293–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04491.x
Gilmore BS, Bassil NV, Hummer KE (2011) DNA extraction protocols from dormant buds of twelve woody plant genera. J Am Pomol Soc 65(4):201–206
Graham RA (1958) Mint notes, VII: Mentha × maximileanea F. Schultz in Britain
Greilhuber J, Temsch EM, Loureiro JCM (2007) Nuclear DNA content measurement. Flow cytometry with plant cells. Wiley, London, pp 67–101
Harley RM, Brighton CA (1977) Chromosome numbers in the genus Mentha L. Bot J Linn Soc 74(1):71–96
Iorizzo M, Senalik DA, Grzebelus D, Bowman M, Cavagnaro PF et al (2011) De novo assembly and characterization of the carrot transcriptome reveals novel genes, new markers, and genetic diversity. BMC Genomics 12:389. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-389
Jedrzejczyk I, Rewers M (2018) Genome size and ISSR markers for Mentha L. (Lamiaceae) genetic diversity assessment and species identification. Ind Crops Prod 120:171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.04.062
Kamvar ZN, Tabima JF, Grünwald NJ (2014) Poppr: an R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ 2:e281
Kamvar ZN, Brooks JC, Grünwald NJ (2015) Novel R tools for analysis of genome-wide population genetic data with emphasis on clonality. Front Genet 6:208
Kawchuk LM, Hachey J, Lynch DR, Kulcsar F, van Rooijen G et al (2001) Tomato Ve disease resistance genes encode cell surface-like receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(11):6511–6515. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.091114198
Kumar B, Kumar U, Yadav HK (2015) Identification of EST–SSRs and molecular diversity analysis in Mentha piperita. Crop J 3(4):335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2015.02.002
Lattier JD, Chen H, Contreras RN (2017) Improved method of enzyme digestion for root tip cytology. HortScience 52(7):1029–1032
Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20(2):289–290
Ringer KL, McConkey ME, Davis EM, Rushing GW, Croteau R (2003) Monoterpene double-bond reductases of the (−)-menthol biosynthetic pathway: isolation and characterization of cDNAs encoding (−)-isopiperitenone reductase and (+)-pulegone reductase of peppermint. Arch Biochem Biophys 418(1):80–92
Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotech 18:233–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/72708
Shaban M, Miao Y, Ullah A, Khan AQ, Menghwar H et al (2018) Physiological and molecular mechanism of defense in cotton against Verticillium dahliae. Plant Physiol Biochem 125:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.02.011
Tucker IAO (2012) Genetics and breeding of the genus Mentha: a model for other polyploid species with secondary constituents. J Med Active Plants 1(1):7
Tucker AO, Naczi RF (2007) Mentha: an overview of its classification and relationships. In: Lawrence BM (ed) Mint: the genus Mentha. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–39
Vining K, Davis T (2009) Isolation of a Ve homolog, mVe1, and its relationship to Verticillium wilt resistance in Mentha longifolia (L.) Huds. Mol Genet Genomics 282(2):173–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-009-0454-6
Vining KJ, Zhang Q, Tucker AO, Smith C, Davis TM (2005) Mentha longifolia (L.) L.: a model species for mint genetic research. HortScience 40(5):1225–1229
Vining KJ, Johnson SR, Ahkami A, Lange I, Parrish AN et al (2017) Draft genome sequence of Mentha longifolia and development of resources for mint cultivar improvement. Mol Plant 10(2):323–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2016.10.018
You FM, Huo N, Gu YQ, Luo M, Ma Y et al (2008) BatchPrimer3: a high throughput web application for PCR and sequencing primer design. BMC Bioinform 9(1):253
Zurn JD, Carter KA, Yin MH, Worthington M, Clark JR et al (2018) Validating blackberry seedling pedigrees and developing an improved multiplexed microsatellite fingerprinting set. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 143(5):381–390
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Figure S1
Herbarium specimens showing leaf and flower morphology for M. aquatica accessions (PDF 11860 kb)
Figure S2
Herbarium specimens showing leaf and flower morphology for M. suaveolens accessions (PDF 8524 kb)
Figure S3
Correlation analysis of oil constituents versus Verticillium susceptibility scores (JPEG 78 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vining, K.J., Pandelova, I., Hummer, K. et al. Genetic diversity survey of Mentha aquatica L. and Mentha suaveolens Ehrh., mint crop ancestors. Genet Resour Crop Evol 66, 825–845 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-019-00750-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-019-00750-4