Figures
Abstract
Hybrid lethality is expressed at 28°C in the cross Nicotiana nudicaulis×N. tabacum. The S subgenome of N. tabacum has been identified as controlling this hybrid lethality. To clarify the responsible genomic factor(s) of N. nudicaulis, we crossed N. trigonophylla (paternal progenitor of N. nudicaulis) with N. tabacum, because hybrids between N. sylvestris (maternal progenitor of N. nudicaulis) and N. tabacum are viable when grown in a greenhouse. In the cross N. trigonophylla×N. tabacum, approximately 50% of hybrids were vitrified, 20% were viable, and 20% were nonviable at 28°C. To reveal which subgenome of N. tabacum was responsible for these phenotypes, we crossed N. trigonophylla with two progenitors of N. tabacum, N. sylvestris (SS) and N. tomentosiformis (TT). In the cross N. sylvestris×N. trigonophylla, we confirmed that over half of hybrids of N. sylvestris×N. trigonophylla were vitrified, and none of the hybrids of N. trigonophylla×N. tomentosiformis were. The results imply that the S subgenome, encoding a gene or genes inducing hybrid lethality in the cross between N. nudicaulis and N. tabacum, has one or more genomic factors that induce vitrification. Furthermore, in vitrified hybrids of N. trigonophylla×N. tabacum and N. sylvestris×N. trigonophylla, we found that nuclear fragmentation, which progresses during expression of hybrid lethality, was accompanied by vitrification. This observation suggests that vitrification has a relationship to hybrid lethality. Based on these results, we speculate that when N. nudicaulis was formed approximately 5 million years ago, several causative genomic factors determining phenotypes of hybrid seedlings were inherited from N. trigonophylla. Subsequently, genome downsizing and various recombination-based processes took place. Some of the causative genomic factors were lost and some became genomic factor(s) controlling hybrid lethality in extant N. nudicaulis.
Citation: Liu H, Marubashi W (2014) Species Origin of Genomic Factors in Nicotiana nudicaulis Watson Controlling Hybrid Lethality in Interspecific Hybrids between N. nudicaulis Watson and N. tabacum L. PLoS ONE 9(5): e97004. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097004
Editor: Randall P. Niedz, United States Department of Agriculture, United States of America
Received: December 19, 2013; Accepted: April 15, 2014; Published: May 7, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Liu, Marubashi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.
Competing interests: The authors have the following interests. Although the seeds of N. trigonophylla Dunal (2n = 24), N. tabacum (2n = 48, SSTT) ‘Red Russian,’ N. sylvestris Speg. & Comes (2n = 24, SS) and N. tomentosiformis Goodsp. (2n = 24, TT) used in this experiment were kindly provided free of charge, no types of funding, salaries, payments, honoraria, etc. were received from Japan Tobacco Inc (Oyama, Japan). This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.
Introduction
Hybrid lethality is a postzygotic barrier of reproductive isolation, which can occur in intergeneric, interspecific, and intraspecific crosses and causes death of some hybrids in Nicotiana species, Arabidopsis thaliana, tomato (Solanum pimpinellifolium×S. lycopersicum) and lettuce (Lactuca saligna×L. sativa) [1]–[5]. Bomblies and Weigel [6] concluded that hybrid lethality is a barrier to gene flow in Arabidopsis thaliana and tomato (Solanum pimpinellifolium×S. lycopersicum) and acts as an autoimmune-like response. Hybrid lethality is a mechanism playing a crucial role in the evolution of plants and is an important obstacle in plant breeding programs. In Nicotiana, hybrid lethality shows five specific phenotypes depending on the cross combination [7], [8].
The genus Nicotiana (Solanaceae) includes 76 species that are classified into 12 sections distributed mainly in the Americas and one section found outside the Americas; this section is Suaveolentes, which is restricted to Australia, islands of the South Pacific, and Africa [9]. The section Suaveolentes includes 26 species, 20 of which produce nonviable hybrids in crosses with well-studied cultivated tobacco lines belonging to section Genuinae, namely Nicotiana tabacum (2n = 48, SSTT), which originated by interspecific hybridization of N. sylvestris (2n = 24, SS) with N. tomentosiformis (2n = 24, TT) followed by chromosome doubling [10]–[17].
In crosses between 11 of the 20 Suaveolentes species and N. tabacum, the S subgenome of N. tabacum is involved in hybrid lethality at 28°C [18]–[23]. Furthermore, causative gene(s) of hybrid lethality in N. tabacum are encoded on the Q chromosome belonging to the S subgenome [24]–[28]. Based on these results, Tezuka [2] speculated that many species of section Suaveolentes share the same gene(s) triggering hybrid lethality by interaction with gene(s) on the Q chromosome. Recently, the first linkage map for N. tabacum was constructed by Bindler et al. [29] with SSR markers. Tezuka et al. [30] used this map to determine that the gene(s) responsible for hybrid lethality map to the region between SSR markers PT30342 and PT30365 of linkage group 11, corresponding to the Q chromosome.
Although investigations into the causative gene(s) in N. tabacum for hybrid lethality have been extensive, investigations on genomic factor(s) in wild species of section Suaveolentes have not. Although a single dominant gene, designated HYBRID LETHALITY A1 (HLA1), controls hybrid lethality in N. debneyi (a wild species of section Suaveolentes) by interaction with gene(s) on the Q chromosome of N. tabacum, the gene location is unknown [31].
Section Repandae exists in North America and consists of four allopolyploid species: N. nudicaulis, N. repanda, N. stocktonii and N. nesophila. Section Repandae is considered to have originated approximately 5 million years ago from hybridization between ancestors of extant species of Nicotiana section Sylvestres (N. sylvestris) and Trigonophyllae (N. obtusifolia, formerly known as N. trigonophylla), the maternal and paternal progenitors, respectively, and their evolutionary relationships are well known [17], [32], [33]. N. nudicaulis is sister to, and morphologically distinct from, the three remaining species, diverging from them 2–3 million years ago, whereas N. stocktonii and N. nesophila diverged from N. repanda one million years ago; section Repandae is genetically distant from N. tabacum, even though they share the same maternal progenitor, N. sylvestris [34], [35].
In a previous study [36], hybrid lethality was observed in crosses of N. repanda×N. tabacum. Furthermore, Kobori and Marubashi [37] concluded that the T subgenome of N. tabacum encodes the causative gene(s) for hybrid lethality in the cross N. repanda×N. tabacum. On the other hand, the S subgenome of N. tabacum is related to hybrid lethality at 28°C in hybrids between N. nudicaulis and N. tabacum [38], [39]. In contrast to research on the subgenome controlling hybrid lethality in N. tabacum, no studies of the subgenome of wild species involved in hybrid lethality have been reported to our knowledge. In previous studies [40], [41], N. sylvestris (maternal progenitor of N. nudicaulis) was crossed with N. tabacum, and viable hybrids were produced. Here, we added the cross between N. trigonophylla (paternal progenitor of N. nudicaulis) and N. tabacum to infer the likely origins of genomic factor(s) in this wild species.
Apoptosis is a distinct type of cell death, and it is characterized in animals by condensation of chromatin, fragmentation of nuclei, cytoplasmic reduction, and fragmentation of DNA [42]–[44]. In hybrid seedlings of N. nudicaulis×N. tabacum expressing hybrid lethality, features of apoptosis such as chromatin condensation, nuclear fragmentation, and fragmentation of DNA were evident [38].
In the present study, we examined several phenotypes of hybrid seedlings in the cross N. trigonophylla×N. tabacum, and half of the hybrid seedlings showed vitrification. Vitrification frequently occurs and is a serious problem in plant micropropagation. Vitrified plants have translucent stems, brittle, water-soaked, elongated and curled leaves [45]. This report is the first to confirm that vitrified hybrid seedlings appear in interspecific crosses and that nuclear fragmentation is typically associated with vitrification. Because nuclear fragmentation also progresses during expression of hybrid lethality in the cross between N. nudicaulis and N. tabacum [38], we concluded that there is a relationship between vitrification and hybrid lethality. Furthermore, we found that the causative gene(s) in N. tabacum of vitrification are encoded on the S subgenome involved in hybrid lethality. These results also suggest that vitrification has a relationship to hybrid lethality. On the other hand, when N. sylvestris was crossed with N. tabacum, hybrid lethality was not observed [41], [42]. Based on these results, we inferred that the genomic factor(s) in N. nudicaulis leading to hybrid lethality in the cross between N. nudicaulis and N. tabacum is likely derived from N. trigonophylla.
Materials and Methods
Plant Materials
The seeds of N. trigonophylla Dunal (2n = 24, TrTr), N. tabacum (2n = 48, SSTT) ‘Red Russian,’ N. sylvestris Speg. & Comes (2n = 24, SS) and N. tomentosiformis Goodsp. (2n = 24, TT) were used in these experiments and were supplied by Japan Tobacco Inc. (Oyama, Japan). Plants were grown and pollinated in a greenhouse of the School of Agriculture, Meiji University.
Ovule Culture
Because in conventional crossing between N. trigonophylla and N. tabacum, it is difficult to obtain hybrid seedlings, ovule culture was carried out 5 days after pollination and seedlings obtained as described by Chung et al. [46]. Flowers of N. trigonophylla used as the maternal parent were emasculated before flowering and pollinated with fresh N. tabacum pollen. Five days after pollination, flowers of N. trigonophylla were collected and the sepals, petals, and styles were removed. The ovaries were surface-sterilized with 70% ethanol for 30 s with 5% sodium hypochlorite for 10 min, then rinsed three times with sterilized water. The ovary walls were peeled to expose the placenta with intact ovules. All of the ovules were excised and cultured on Petri dishes containing 8 ml 1/2x MS medium [47] supplemented with 8% sucrose and 0.25% Gelrite, pH 5.8, at 28°C under continuous illumination (30 µmol photons s−1 m−2).
Test Tube Pollination and Ovule Culture
Because no fertile seeds were obtained in situ from the cross N. trigonophylla×N. sylvestris or N. sylvestris×N. trigonophylla, and ovaries of N. trigonophylla are too small for test tube pollination and ovule culture, we carried out test tube pollination and ovule culture in the cross N. sylvestris×N. trigonophylla as described [48], and hybrid seedlings were obtained.
Cultivation of Hybrid Seedlings
Immediately after germination, all hybrid seedlings of N. trigonophylla×N. tabacum or N. sylvestris×N. trigonophylla were separately transferred onto the surface of 1/2x MS medium with 1% sucrose at 28°C under continuous illumination (123 µmol s−1 m−2 or 147 µmol s−1 m−2). Some hybrid seedlings were transferred to flat-bottomed test tubes (25 mm diameter, 100 mm length) that contained 10 ml 1/2x MS medium supplemented with 1% sucrose and 0.25% Gelrite, pH 5.8, 20 days after germination (DAG).
Interspecific Crosses of N. trigonophylla×N. tomentosiformis
Conventional crossing was carried out as follows: flowers of N. trigonophylla used as the maternal parent were emasculated before flowering and then pollinated with fresh N. tomentosiformis pollen. F1 seeds (N. trigonophylla×N. tomentosiformis) were soaked in 0.05% gibberellic acid (GA3) solution for 30 min, sterilized with 5% sodium hypochlorite for 15 min and then rinsed three times with sterilized water. Sterilized F1 seeds were sown on Petri dishes containing 8 ml 1/2x MS medium [47] supplemented with 1% sucrose and 0.25% Gelrite, pH 5.8; the plates were maintained for seed germination at 28°C under continuous illumination (30 µmol s−1 m−2). Hybrid seedlings cultured at 28°C were all viable. These seedlings were potted at 20 DAG and cultivated in a greenhouse under natural lighting conditions.
Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Analysis
Total DNA was extracted from the leaves of the hybrid seedlings using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide [49]. RAPD analysis was carried out as described [39] using 20 random 10-mer oligonucleotide primers (Kit OPE, OPF; Operon Technologies, Inc., Alameda, CA, USA). PCR amplification was performed using an Applied Biosystems 2720 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) programmed for 3 min at 94°C for initial denaturation, followed by 60 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 1 min at 28°C for seedlings of N. trigonophylla×N. tomentosiformis, 32°C for seedlings of N. trigonophylla×N. tomentosiformis, or 25°C for seedlings of N. sylvestris×N. trigonophylla, then 2 min at 72°C, and a final extension of 5 min at 72°C. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels in TAE buffer and stained with ethidium bromide to visualize DNA bands.
Chromosome Analysis
Root tips of viable seedlings were pretreated with distilled water for 24 h at 4°C and with 2 mM 8-hydroxyquinoline for 4 h at 4°C, then fixed in a 3∶1 mixture of ethanol and acetic acid overnight to determine chromosome numbers. The root tips were hydrolyzed in 1 N HCl for 9 min at 60°C, stained with Schiff’s reagent and squashed in 45% acetic acid. The number of chromosomes in at least five root tip cells for each plant was counted under a BX51 light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and photographed using a DP70 automatic photomicrography system (Olympus).
Flow Cytometry
For cytometric analysis, nuclei were isolated from 100 mg leaves (except for midrib) of N. trigonophylla×N. tabacum or N. sylvestris×N. trigonophylla hybrid seedlings at 28°C; the leaves were chopped off and macerated in ice-cold buffer [50]. Four plants were analyzed for each type of sample. The macerated tissue was filtered through a 25 µm nylon mesh. Nuclei were collected from the filtrate by centrifugation (5 min at 3000 rpm and 4°C) and suspended in ice-cold buffer supplemented with 5 µl/ml DAPI for 1 min at 4°C. The DNA content of the isolated nuclei was analyzed by flow cytometry on a Cell Lab Quanta SC system (Beckman Coulter Inc., La Brea, CA, USA). Between 16,000 and 22,000 nuclei were counted.
Results
Types of Abnormal Hybrid Seedlings of N. trigonophylla×N. tabacum Observed
When the cross N. trigonophylla×N. tabacum was carried out via conventional cross-pollination, no hybrid seedlings were obtained. Ovule culture was needed, as described previously [46]. Therefore, flowers of N. trigonophylla were pollinated with fresh N. tabacum pollen. From 31 flowers, 8284 ovules were obtained 5 days after pollination and 92 began to germinate 1 month after pollination. To confirm the expression of hybrid lethality, all of these seedlings were left at 28°C (Table 1).
Of the seedlings obtained, 43 were vitrified, 24 were nonviable, 21 were viable, 2 were tumorous hybrids, and 2 showed malformation (Figure 1).
(A) A vitrified hybrid plant. (B) A vitrified hybrid plant that changed from a browning tumorous plant. (C) A vitrified hybrid plant coexisting with tumors. (D) Vitrification that occurred on a tumorous hybrid plant. (E) A vitrified hybrid plant that changed from a tumorous plant, which had developed at the crown of a malformed plant. (F) A tumorous hybrid plant that died 10 DAG. (G) A malformed hybrid plant that died 14 DAG. (H) A viable hybrid plant coexisting with tumors. (I) A tumorous hybrid plant that developed at the crown of a yellowing plant. (J) A tumorous hybrid plant that developed at the crown of a browning vitrified plant. (K) A malformed hybrid plant. Scale bars are 1 mm.
Of the vitrified 43 hybrid seedlings, 25 hybrid plants were vitrified after germination (Figure 1A). Eight hybrid plants were tumorous after germination, and became vitrified after browning (Figure 1B). Seven vitrified hybrid plants coexisted with tumors after germination (Figure 1C). Two hybrid plants were tumorous after germination, and then became vitrified (Figure 1D). One hybrid plant was malformed after germination. It developed a tumor at the crown, and then became vitrified (Figure 1E).
Of the 24 nonviable hybrid seedlings, 20 were tumorous after germination and died 15 DAG (Figure 1F). The others were malformed after germination, and died 7 DAG (Figure 1G). On the other hand, of the 21 viable hybrid seedlings, six coexisted with tumors after germination (Figure 1H).
Of the two tumorous hybrid seedlings, one had a tumor that developed at the crown of the hybrid seedling, which was yellowing (Figure 1I). The other tumor developed at the crown of the seedling, which was browning and vitrified (Figure 1J).
To determine whether the viable and vitrified seedlings were true hybrids, we carried out morphological observation, RAPD analysis and chromosomal analyses on the viable seedlings, and flow cytometry on the vitrified seedlings. Four randomly selected seedlings were cultivated in a greenhouse for 60 DAG. All of the selected seedlings grew to maturity and came into flower (Figure 2A). The mature hybrid plants displayed uniform morphological characteristics, with leaf and flower shapes that were intermediate in appearance between those of the parents (Figure 2B-D). Chromosomal analyses of the hybrid plants revealed that each possessed 36 chromosomes, which is the sum of the number of haploid chromosomes of the parents (Figure 2E).
(A) Shape of a hybrid plant that grew to maturity and flowered. (B) Leaves of N. trigonophylla, a hybrid and N. tabacum (left to right). (C and D) Flowers of N. trigonophylla, a hybrid and N. tabacum (left to right). (E) Image of root tip cell of a hybrid plant, showing the number of chromosomes. (F) Confirmation of hybrid formation by RAPD analysis using primer OPE-14. The bands characteristic of both parents are indicated by arrows. M, size marker OneSTEP Ladder 1kb (1–10 kbp). Scale bars are 10 cm (A), 3 cm (B), 1 cm (C and D) and 100 µm (E).
RAPD analysis using the primer OPE-14 was carried out on four viable seedlings. In these plants, several bands characteristic of both parents coexisted (Figure 2F, arrows); these patterns indicated that they are true hybrids. Similar results, shown in Figure 2F, were also obtained using several other random primers. All of the viable hybrid seedlings from the cross N. trigonophylla×N. tabacum were male sterile.
Flow cytometric analysis showed that the vitrified plants were true hybrids (Figure 3). The DAPI fluorescence values of the peaks corresponding to the G1 phase of the cell cycle differed, with values increasing in the order N. trigonophylla, viable hybrids and N. tabacum, using the G1 peak of N. trigonophylla as the internal standard in this experiment. The G1 peak of a viable hybrid was intermediate between the values of each parent (Figure 3B). The G1 peak values of vitrified seedlings were also intermediate between that of the parents. However, fluorescence values of these G1 peaks were closer to that of N. trigonophylla and were different from that of viable hybrid seedlings. Furthermore, subG1 peaks, with lower fluorescence values than that of G1 peaks, indicating nuclear fragmentation, appeared and the values for G1 peaks differed among vitrified hybrid plants (Figure 3C-E, black arrows).
The DNA content of 16,000–22,000 nuclei was determined by flow cytometry. (A) A sample of leaf cells from N. trigonophylla as the internal standard. The two peaks are characteristic of G1 nuclei and G2/M nuclei. (B) The G1 peak of a viable hybrid plant was intermediate between the two parents. The abbreviations N. tri and N. tab are for N. trigonophylla and N. tabacum, respectively. (C, D and E) The G1 peaks of vitrified hybrid seedlings were also intermediate between parents. However, the DAPI fluorescence values of these G1 peaks were closer to that of N. trigonophylla and the fluorescence values of G1 peaks differed among vitrified hybrid plants. Furthermore, subG1 peaks (black arrows), indicating nuclear fragmentation, with lower fluorescence values than that of G1 peaks appeared.
Types of Abnormal Hybrid Seedlings of N. sylvestris×N. trigonophylla Observed
Reciprocal crosses between N. trigonophylla and N. sylvestris were carried out using conventional cross-pollination, but no hybrid seedlings were obtained (Table 2). Therefore, test tube pollination and ovule culture were performed to overcome the crossing barrier.
Pollination of 129 placentas of N. sylvestris in vitro resulted in 634 enlarged ovules that were cultured at 28°C, and 147 hybrid seedlings germinated from these ovules. Vitrified, viable and nonviable hybrid seedlings were observed; there were 89 vitrified seedlings, 57 viable seedlings and one nonviable seedling (Table 2). Of the 89 vitrified seedlings, 32 coexisted with tumors (Figure 4A and B). The growth of one nonviable hybrid seedling stopped at an early stage, and it died 60 DAG (Figure 4C).
(A) A vitrified hybrid plant. (B) A vitrified hybrid plant coexisting with tumors. (C) A malformed hybrid plant that died 3 weeks after germination. Scale bar is 1 mm.
To confirm that these seedlings were true hybrids, morphological observation, RAPD analysis and chromosome analysis were carried out for the four viable seedlings, and flow cytometry was carried out for the vitrified seedlings. All of the viable hybrid seedlings grew to maturity and flowered (Figure 5A). The leaf shape, flower shape and flower color of the viable hybrid seedlings were intermediate in appearance between that of the parents (Figure 5B-D). Four hybrid plants, selected randomly, had 24 chromosomes (Figure 5E), which is the sum of the number of haploid chromosomes of their parents, N. sylvestris (2n = 24) and N. trigonophylla (2n = 24). These hybrid plants were male sterile. N. sylvestris, N. trigonophylla, and hybrid plants were also analyzed using RAPD. Hybrid plants had several bands in common between the RAPD patterns of parents using several primers (data not shown). RAPD patterns obtained with the primer OPF-03 are shown in Figure 5F as an example.
(A) Shape of a hybrid plant that grew to maturity and flowered. (B) Leaves of N. trigonophylla, a hybrid and N. tabacum (left to right). (C and D) Flowers of N. trigonophylla, a hybrid and N. tabacum (left to right). (E) Image of root tip cell of a hybrid plant, showing the number of chromosomes. (F) Confirmation of hybrid formation by RAPD analysis using primer OPF-03. The bands characteristic of both parents are indicated by arrows. M, size marker OneSTEP Ladder 1kb (1–10 kbp). Scale bars are 10 cm (A), 3 cm (B), 1 cm (C and D) and 100 µm (E).
We used flow cytometry to clarify the extent of hybridity of the vitrified seedlings. The G1 peak of a viable seedling was intermediate between that of its parents, with a fluorescence value of 220 (Figure 6A-C), and the G1 peak of a vitrified seedling appeared at the same fluorescence values as that of a viable seedling (Figure 6C and D). Based on these results, we proved that the vitrified seedlings were true hybrids. However, the number of nuclei included in the G2/M peak of vitrified hybrids was greater than that of viable hybrids (Figure 6D, red arrow). In addition, another G2/M peak was expressed at a fluorescence value of 870 (Figure 6D). These results signify that in the G2/M peak of the vitrified hybrid plants (Figure 6D, red arrow), a G1 peak corresponding to an allotetraploid was included.
The DNA content of 16,000–22,000 nuclei was determined by flow cytometry. (A) A sample of leaf cells from N. trigonophylla as the internal standard. The two peaks are characteristic of G1 nuclei and G2/M nuclei. (B) The DAPI fluorescence values of the G1 peak for N. sylvestris were different from that of N. trigonophylla. (C) The G1 peak of a viable hybrid plant was intermediate between the two parents. (D) The G1 peak of a vitrified hybrid seedling was intermediate between parents. SubG1 peaks (black arrows) indicating nuclear fragmentation, with lower fluorescence values than that of the G1 peak appeared and the number of nuclei included in the G2/M peak of vitrified hybrids (red arrow) was higher than that of viable hybrid plants. In addition, another G2/M peak was apparent at a fluorescence value of 870.
The subG1 peak (corresponding to fragmented nuclei) with lower fluorescence values than that of the G1 peaks also appeared for the cross N. trigonophylla×N. tabacum (Figure 6D, black arrow). This characteristic suggests that nuclear fragmentation progressed with vitrification.
Viable Hybrid Seedlings of N. trigonophylla×N. tomentosiformis
Results of conventional cross-pollination between N. trigonophylla and N. tomentosiformis are shown in Figure 7. Hybrid seedlings were obtained approximately 3 weeks after pollination. Hybrid seeds from N. trigonophylla×N. tomentosiformis crosses were sown in 1/2x MS medium and germinated at 28°C. The hybrid seedlings germinated well, and all of the hybrid seedlings were viable at 20 DAG. These seedlings grew to maturity and flowered (Figure 7A). The morphological characteristics of hybrid plants were uniform and intermediate in appearance between those of the parents, including the leaf shape and flower shape (Figure 7B-D). The chromosome number of the hybrid plants was 24, the sum of the number of haploid chromosomes of the parents (Figure 7E). RAPD patterns for hybrid plants showed several clear bands characteristic of the parents using several primers, indicating that they are true hybrids (data not shown). RAPD patterns obtained with the primer OPE-14 are shown in Figure 7F.
(A) Shape of a hybrid plant that grew to maturity and flowered. (B) Leaves of N. trigonophylla, a hybrid and N. tomentosiformis (left to right). (C and D) Flowers of N. trigonophylla, a hybrid and N. tomentosiformis (left to right). (E) Image of root tip cell of a hybrid plant, showing the number of chromosomes. (F) Confirmation of hybrid formation by RAPD analysis using primer OPE-14. The bands characteristic of both parents are indicated by arrows. M, size marker OneSTEP Ladder 1kb (1–10 kbp). Scale bars are 10 cm (A), 3 cm (B), 1 cm (C and D) and 100 µm (E).
Discussion
Vitrification is a morphological and physiological disorder affecting in vitro regenerated plants, and is promoted by several environmental factors including low gelling agent concentrations, liquid media, high relative humidity, high water potential in the medium, excess auxin or cytokinin, low agar concentration, high ammonium levels and high airtightness of the vessel [51]–[56]. However, vitrification occurring in interspecific crosses does not appear to have been reported previously. Though the focus of the paper was on hybrid lethality, a connection to vitrification was one of our findings. We observed vitrified hybrid seedlings from N. trigonophylla×N. tabacum when they were cultured in MS medium (in the absence of added plant growth regulators), and the number of vitrified hybrids was approximately 50% of the total (Table 1). In Nicotiana, hybrid lethality is classified into five types based on the external phenotype: Type I, browning of shoot apex and root tips; Type II, browning of hypocotyls and roots; Type III, yellowing of true leaves; Type IV, formation of multiple shoots; and Type V, fading of shoot color [7], [8]. To our knowledge, of 26 species in section Suaveolentes, 22 have been crossed with N. tabacum and viability of hybrid seedlings has been reported. Among these crosses, hybrid lethality (Type II or V) is observed in the hybrid seedlings of 20 wild species and N. tabacum. In two other crosses, hybrid seedlings are viable [2]. However, we found that the morphology of hybrid plants of N. trigonophylla×N. tabacum is nonuniform (Figure 8A). In several previous reports, it was reported that the phenotype of hybrid seedlings in reciprocal crosses was the same [8]. Since in crosses between section Suaveolentes species and N. tabacum, all hybrid seedlings either express hybrid lethality or do not, we speculate that N. trigonophylla has causative genomic factors affecting the phenotype of hybrid seedlings.
Similar observations of vitrification occurred in a cross between N. trigonophylla and N. sylvestris, but not in a cross of N. trigonophylla×N. tomentosiformis. These results indicate that the vitrification in the interspecific cross N. trigonophylla×N. tabacum is genetically controlled, and that the S subgenome of N. tabacum controls it (Figure 8A).
Section Repandae formed from a single hybridization event between relatives of extant N. sylvestris and N. trigonophylla, the respective maternal and paternal progenitors, producing four allopolyploids: N. nudicaulis, N. repanda, N. stocktonii and N. nesophila [17], [32], [33]. When N. sylvestris was crossed with N. tabacum, viable hybrids were obtained (Figure 8B). On the other hand, in the cross N. nudicaulis×N. tabacum, hybrid lethality was expressed and controlled by the S subgenome of N. tabacum (Figure 8C); the genomic factor related to vitrification is also in the S subgenome (Figure 8A). Based on these results, we inferred that the genomic factor in N. nudicaulis controlling hybrid lethality in the cross N. nudicaulis×N. tabacum is not related to the maternal progenitor, N. sylvestris, but is inherited from the paternal progenitor, N. trigonophylla. Although in the cross N. trigonophylla×N. tabacum, approximately 50% of hybrid seedlings showed vitrification, and hybrid lethality is expressed in the cross N. nudicaulis×N. tabacum, both N. nudicaulis and N. trigonophylla interact with the same subgenome of N. tabacum (the S subgenome) to control hybrid lethality or vitrification. Moreover, when we confirmed the hybridity of the vitrified seedlings of both N. trigonophylla×N. tabacum and N. sylvestris×N. trigonophylla using flow cytometry, we detected characteristic patterns of subG1 peaks with lower fluorescence values than observed for G1 peaks, indicating nuclear fragmentation (Figures 3C-E and 6C, black arrows); the fluorescence of these subG1 peaks increased in the seedlings of N. nudicaulis×N. tabacum as they progressed through the stages of apoptotic cell death [38]. Thus, these results indicate that vitrification and hybrid lethality share the same hallmark of apoptosis, namely nuclear fragmentation. Furthermore, based on these results, we infer that vitrification is related to hybrid lethality.
Recent advances have highlighted the ubiquity of whole-genome duplication (polyploidy) in angiosperms; although global analyses of genome size reveal a trend towards DNA loss subsequent to polyploidy (genome downsizing), increases in genome size also occur [34], [57]. In section Repandae, there is considerable departure from additivity in seven transposable element families, typically through deletion, especially for transposable elements derived from the N. obtusifolia parent [35]. Moreover, Renny-Byfield et al. [58] presented evidence that loss of high-copy-number repeats in the genome of N. nudicaulis, some of which are Ty3/Gypsy retroelements, contributed to a reduction of approximately 14% in genome size, similar to the 19% estimated using Markov chain Monte Carlo approaches. From these reports, we speculate that when N. nudicaulis was formed from the hybridization of N. sylvestris and N. trigonophylla approximately 5 million years ago, several genomic factors determining phenotypes of hybrid seedlings were inherited from N. trigonophylla. Subsequently, genome downsizing and various recombination-based processes took place. Some of the causative genomic factors were lost and some of them became genomic factor(s) controlling hybrid lethality in extant N. nudicaulis.
Currently, we are attempting to perform crosses of monosomic lines of N. tabacum and N. trigonophylla or N. nudicaulis to determine the chromosome(s) of N. tabacum responsible for vitrification of N. trigonophylla×N. tabacum and hybrid lethality of N. nudicaulis×N. tabacum. In the present study, we found that fragmentation of nuclei was accompanied by vitrification during progression of lethal symptoms in hybrids; therefore, we plan to use additional cytobiological approaches to determine whether apoptotic cell death accompanies vitrification.
Such an approach may provide important information revealing the relationship between vitrification and hybrid lethality. Furthermore, we expect these planned experiments will contribute to clarifying the origins of genomic factor(s) in N. nudicaulis controlling hybrid lethality in interspecific hybrids between N. nudicaulis and N. tabacum. This knowledge will likely provide a better understanding of hybrid lethality as a reproductive barrier, which would have broad applications in agriculture.
Acknowledgments
We thank Japan Tobacco, Inc. (Oyama, Japan) for providing seeds from cultivated and wild species of the genus Nicotiana and Dr. N. Kadotani, former Professor of Tamagawa University, for helpful discussions.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: WM. Performed the experiments: HL. Analyzed the data: HL WM. Wrote the paper: HL WM.
References
- 1.
Stebbins GL (1966) Reproductive isolation and the origin of species. In: Processes of organic evolution. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. 85–112.
- 2.
Tezuka T (2012) Hybrid lethality in the genus Nicotiana. In: Mworia JK, editor. Botany. Rijeka: InTech. 191–210.
- 3. Bomblies K, Lempe J, Epple P, Warthmann N, Lanz C, et al. (2007) Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky-Muller-type incompatibility syndrome in plants. PLoS Biol 5: e236.
- 4. Krüger J, Thomas CM, Golstein C, Dixon MS, Smoker M, et al. (2002) A tomato cysteine protease required for Cf-2-dependent disease resistance and suppression of autonecrosis. Science 296: 744–747.
- 5. Jeuken MJW, Zhang NW, McHale LK, Pelgrom K, den Boer E, et al. (2009) Rin4 causes hybrid necrosis and race-specific resistance in an interspecific lettuce hybrid. Plant Cell 21: 3368–3378.
- 6. Bomblies K, Weigel D (2007) Hybrid necrosis: autoimmunity as a potential gene-flow barrier in plant species. Nat Rev Genet 8: 382–393.
- 7. Yamada T, Marubashi W, Niwa M (1999) Detection of four lethality types in interspecific crosses among Nicotiana species through the use of three rescue methods for lethality. Breed Sci 49: 203–210.
- 8. Tezuka T, Marubashi W (2012) Genes in S and T subgenomes are responsible for hybrid lethality in interspecific hybrids between Nicotiana tabacum and Nicotiana occidentalis.. PLoS One 7: e36204.
- 9. Knapp S, Chase MW, Clarkson JJ (2004) Nomenclatural changes and a new sectional classification in Nicotiana (Solanaceae). Taxon 53: 73–82.
- 10. Gray JC, Kung SD, Wildman SG, Sheen SJ (1974) Origin of Nicotiana tabacum L. detected by polypeptide composition of Fraction I protein. Nature (London) 252: 226–227.
- 11. Sheen SJ (1972) Isozymic evidence bearing on the origin of Nicotiana tabacum L. Evolution. 26: 143–154.
- 12. Kenton A, Parokonny AS, Gleba YY, Bennett MD (1993) Characterization of the Nicotiana tabacum L. genome by molecular cytogenetics. Mol Gen Genet 240: 159–169.
- 13. Lim KY, Matyásek R, Lichtenstein CP, Leitch AR (2000) Molecular cytogenetic analyses and phylogenetic studies in the Nicotiana section Tomentosae. Chromosoma 109: 245–258.
- 14. Murad L, Lim KY, Christopodulou V, Matyasek R, Lichtenstein CP, et al. (2002) The origin of tobacco’s T genome is traced to a particular lineage within Nicotiana tomentosiformis (Solanaceae). Am J Bot 89: 921–928.
- 15. Murad L, Bielawski JP, Matyasek R, Kovarík A, Nichols RA, et al. (2004) The origin and evolution of geminivirus-related DNA sequences in Nicotiana.. Heredity (Edinb) 92: 352–358.
- 16. Chase MW, Knapp S, Cox AV, Clarkson JJ, Butsko Y, et al. (2003) Molecular systematics, GISH and the origin of hybrid taxa in Nicotiana (Solanaceae). Ann Bot (Lond) 92: 107–127.
- 17. Clarkson JJ, Kelly LJ, Leitch AR, Knapp S, Chase MW (2010) Nuclear glutamine synthetase evolution in Nicotiana: Phylogenetics and the origins of allotetraploid and homoploid (diploid) hybrids. Mol Phylogenet Evol 55: 99–112.
- 18. DeVerna JW, Myers JR, Collins GB (1987) Bypassing prefertilization barriers to hybridization in Nicotiana using in vitro pollination and fertilization. Theor Appl Genet 73: 665–671.
- 19. Inoue E, Marubashi W, Niwa M (1994) Simple method for overcoming the lethality observed in the hybrid between Nicotiana suaveolens and N. tabacum. Breed Sci 44: 333–336.
- 20. Inoue E, Marubashi W, Niwa M (1996) Genomic factors controlling the lethality exhibited in the hybrid between Nicotiana suaveolens Lehm. and N. tabacum L. Theor Appl Genet 93: 341–347.
- 21. Marubashi W, Kobayashi M (2002) Temperature-dependent apoptosis detected in hybrids between Nicotiana debneiyi and N. tabacum expressing lethality. Plant Biotechnol 19: 267–270.
- 22. Tezuka T, Kuboyama T, Matsuda T, Marubashi W (2010) Seven of eight species in Nicotiana section Suaveolentes have common factors leading to hybrid lethality in crosses with Nicotiana tabacum. Ann Bot 106: 267–276.
- 23. Laskowska D, Berbeć A (2012) Production and characterization of amphihaploid hybrids between Nicotiana wuttkei Clarkson et Symon and N. tabacum L. Euphytica. 183: 75–82.
- 24. Marubashi W, Onosato K (2002) Q chromosome controls the lethality of interspecific hybrids between Nicotiana tabacum and N. suaveolens. Breed Sci 52: 137–142.
- 25. Tezuka T, Marubashi W (2006) Genomic factors lead to programmed cell death during hybrid lethality in interspecific hybrids between Nicotiana tabacum and N. debneyi. SABRAO J Breed Genet 38: 69–81.
- 26. Tezuka T, Marubashi W (2006) Hybrid lethality in interspecific hybrids between Nicotiana tabacum and N. suaveolens: Evidence that the Q chromosome causes hybrid lethality based on Q-chromosome-specific DNA markers. Theor Appl Genet 112: 1172–1178.
- 27. Tezuka T, Kuboyama T, Matsuda T, Marubashi W (2007) Possible involvement of genes on the Q chromosome of Nicotiana tabacum in expression of hybrid lethality and programmed cell death during interspecific hybridization to Nicotiana debneyi. Planta 226: 753–764.
- 28. Matsuo C, Iizuka T, Marubashi W, Oda M, Tezuka T (2011) Identification of the chromosome responsible for hybrid lethality in interspecific hybrids (Nicotiana tabacum×N. ingulba) by Q-chromosome-specific SSR markers. Breed Res 13 (Suppl. 1)90 (in Japanese)..
- 29. Bindler G, Plieske J, Bakaher N, Gunduz I, Ivanov N (2011) A high-density genetic map of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) obtained from large scale microsatellite marker development. Theor Appl Genet 123: 219–230.
- 30. Tezuka T, Matsuo C, Iizuka T, Oda M, Marubashi W (2012) Identification of Nicotiana tabacum linkage group corresponding to the Q chromosome gene(s) involved in hybrid lethality. PLoS One 7: e37822.
- 31. Iizuka T, Kuboyama T, Marubashi W, Oda M, Tezuka T (2012) Nicotiana debneyi has a single dominant gene causing hybrid lethality in crosses with N. tabacum. Euphytica 186: 321–328.
- 32. Clarkson JJ, Knapp S, Garcia VF, Olmstead RG, Leitch AR, et al. (2004) Phylogenetic relationships in Nicotiana (Solanaceae) inferred from multiple plastid DNA regions. Mol Phylogenet Evol 33: 75–90.
- 33. Clarkson JJ, Lim KY, Kovarik A, Chase MW, Knapp S, et al. (2005) Long-term genome diploidization in allopolyploid Nicotiana section Repandae (Solanaceae). New Phytol 168: 241–252.
- 34. Leitch IJ, Hanson L, Lim KY, Kovarik A, Chase MW, et al. (2008) The ups and downs of genome size evolution in polyploid species of Nicotiana (Solanaceae). Ann Bot (Lond) 101: 805–814.
- 35. Parisod C, Mhiri C, Lim KY, Clarkson J, Chase MW, et al. (2012) Differential dynamics of transposable elements during long-term diploidization of Nicotiana section Repandae (Solanaceae) allopolyploid genomes. PLoS One 7: e50352.
- 36. Reed SM, Collins GB (1978) Interspecific hybrids in Nicotiana through in vitro culture of fertilized ovules. J Hered 69: 311–315.
- 37. Kobori S, Marubashi W (2004) Programmed cell death detected in interspecific hybrids of Nicotiana repanda×N. tomentosiformis expressing hybrid lethality. Breed Sci 54: 347–350.
- 38. Liu H, Hoshio M, Masaki Y, Mori Y, Marubashi W (2013) Hybrid lethality with programmed cell death results from reciprocal interspecific crosses between Nicotiana nudicaulis Watson and N. tabacum L. Plant Biotechnol. 30: 179–184.
- 39. Liu H, Mabubashi W (2013) Identification of genomic factors responsible for hybrid lethality in hybrids between Nicotiana nudicaulis Watson and N. tabacum L. Plant Biotechnol. 30: 347–355.
- 40. Olmo HP (1935) Genetical studies of monosomic types of Nicotiana tabacum. Genetics 20: 286–300.
- 41. Clausen RE, Cameron DR (1944) Inheritance in Nicotiana tabacum. XVIII. Monosomic analysis. Genetics 29: 447–477.
- 42. Kerr JFR, Wyllie AH, Currie AR (1972) Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. Br J Cancer 26: 239–257.
- 43. Wylie AH, Morris RG, Smith AL, Dunlop D (1984) Chromatin cleavage in apoptosis: Association with condensed chromatin morphology and dependence on macromolecular synthesis. J Pathol 142: 67–77.
- 44. Cohen JJ (1993) Overview: Mechanisms of apoptosis. Immunol Today 14: 126–130.
- 45. Ziv M (1991) Quality of micropropagated plants–vitrification. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 27: 64–69.
- 46. Chung SC, Nakajima T, Takeda D (1988) Interspecific hybridization between Nicotiana trigonophylla Dun. and N. tabacum L. through ovule culture. Jpn J Breed 38: 319–326.
- 47. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497.
- 48. Marubashi W, Nakajima T (1985) Overcoming cross-incompatibility between Nicotiana tabacum L. and N. rustica L. by test tube pollination and ovule culture. Jpn J Breed 35: 429–437.
- 49. Murray MG, Thompson WF (1980) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8: 4321–4325.
- 50. Michaelson MJ, Price HJ, Ellison JR, Johnston JS (1991) Comparison of plant DNA contents determined by Feulgen microspectrophotometry and laser flow cytometry. Am J Bot 78: 183–188.
- 51. Debergh PC, Harbaoui Y, Lemeur R (1981) Mass propagation of globe artichoke: evaluation of different hypotheses to overcome vitrification with special reference to water potential. Physiol Plant 53: 181–187.
- 52. Debergh PC (1983) Effects of agar brand and concentration on the tissue culture medium. Physiol Plant 59: 270–276.
- 53. Hakkaart FA, Versluijs JMA (1983) Some factors affecting glassiness in carnation meristem tip culture. Neth J Plant Pathol 89: 47–53.
- 54. Pasqualetto PL, Zimmerman RH, Fordham I (1986) Gelling agent and growth regulator effects on shoot vitrification of Gala apple in vitro. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 111: 976–980.
- 55. Ziv M, Meir G, Halevy AH (1983) The development of glaucous hardened carnation plants in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 2: 55–65.
- 56. Zimmerman TW, Cobb BG (1989) Vitrification and soluble carbohydrate levels in petunia leaves as influenced by media Gelrite and sucrose concentrations. Plant Cell Rep 8: 358–360.
- 57. Leitch IJ, Bennett MD (2004) Genome downsizing in polyploid plants. Biol J Linn Soc 82: 651–663.
- 58. Renny-Byfield S, Kovarik A, Kelly LK, Macas J, Novak P, et al. (2013) Diploidization and genome size change in allopolyploids is associated with differential dynamics of low- and high-copy sequences. Plant J 74: 829–839.